Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
67
66 employees · 1 contractor · 27 on an average day Continuing Care At Lantern Hill
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Independent Living & Memory Care · New Providence, NJ
ALM Inspection Grade
C-
ALM's inspection grade is 70 / 100, a C- — 13 points below the New Jersey average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 70 / 100, a C- — 13 points below the New Jersey average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Continuing Care At Lantern Hill
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Independent Living & Memory Care · New Providence, NJ
ALM Inspection Grade
C-
ALM's inspection grade is 70 / 100, a C- — 13 points below the New Jersey average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 70 / 100, a C- — 13 points below the New Jersey average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Continuing Care At Lantern Hill accepts Medicare and private pay.
Continuing Care at Lantern Hill offers independent living, assisted living, memory care and nursing home care in New Providence, NJ. Independent living gives residents private living with community services and no daily care, while assisted living includes help with daily tasks such as dressing, bathing and medication. Memory care provides a secured setting with supervision for someone at risk of wandering. Nursing home care provides licensed nursing care on site around the clock.
The range of care levels can support a resident whose needs grow over time without requiring a move to another community. The community has 40 beds. Total nurse staffing is 6 hours and 3 minutes per resident per day, meaning that amount of nursing time is assigned to each resident each day. Rehabilitation services are available, so residents can receive therapy on site without arranging transportation elsewhere.
Residents have several ways to stay active. A fitness center, aquatics facilities and outdoor walking routes provide places to exercise on site. Dining venues are available, with select meals included in the Monthly Service Package, and pets are allowed. The area has a Walk Score of 63 and is somewhat walkable, so some errands can be completed on foot and a resident who no longer drives may be able to get out independently for certain trips.
Medicare and private pay are accepted. Arvid Agosto serves as administrator, and Lantern Hill operates the community.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 6th out of 277 nursing homes we track in New Jersey for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
6h 3m
This nursing home is ranked 6th out of 277 nursing homes we track in New Jersey for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
6h 3mStandout metric: Registered nurse (RN) is +114% above New Jersey average
1 of 6 metrics below New Jersey average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 10 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
10 staff · 7.4-hour shifts
1h 28m
↑ 114% · NJ 41mThis facility: 1h 28m per resident per day, 114% above the New Jersey average of 41m (among New Jersey facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 10 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
10 staff · 7.4-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 11 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
11 staff · 8-hour shifts
1h 10m
↑ 25% · NJ 56mThis facility: 1h 10m per resident per day, 25% above the New Jersey average of 56m (among New Jersey facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 11 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
11 staff · 8-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 28 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
28 staff · 7.6-hour shifts
3h 25m
↑ 53% · NJ 2h 14mThis facility: 3h 25m per resident per day, 53% above the New Jersey average of 2h 14m (among New Jersey facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 28 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
28 staff · 7.6-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 20m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 20m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
2m
↓ 62% · NJ 6mThis facility: 2m per resident per day, 62% below the New Jersey average of 6m (among New Jersey facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
5h 31m
↑ 60% · NJ 3h 27mThis facility: 5h 31m per resident per day, 60% above the New Jersey average of 3h 27m (among New Jersey facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
53m
↑ 81% · NJ 29mThis facility: 53m per resident per day, 81% above the New Jersey average of 29m (among New Jersey facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 28m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 28m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
67
66 employees · 1 contractor · 27 on an average day
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.6 h
↓ 5% · NJ 8 hThis facility: 7.6 h, 5% below the New Jersey average of 8 h (among New Jersey facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
18,978 staff hours this quarter
See full New Jersey ranking →99.9% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
New Jersey average: 87% · Contractors this quarter: Occupational Therapy Assistant (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
40
Rank #319 / 330Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 319th out of 330 nursing homes we track in New Jersey for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other New Jersey facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New Jersey that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
40
Rank #319 / 330Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 319th out of 330 nursing homes we track in New Jersey for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other New Jersey facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New Jersey that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Walk Score
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #143 / 349Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 143rd out of 349 nursing homes we track in New Jersey for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across New Jersey facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New Jersey that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #143 / 349Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 143rd out of 349 nursing homes we track in New Jersey for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across New Jersey facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New Jersey that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
63
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy higher than 95% suggests steady demand, but availability may be limited.
Rank #39 / 291Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 39th out of 291 nursing homes we track in New Jersey for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the New Jersey average, with its Statewide rank out of 291. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New Jersey that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy higher than 95% suggests steady demand, but availability may be limited.
Rank #39 / 291Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 39th out of 291 nursing homes we track in New Jersey for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the New Jersey average, with its Statewide rank out of 291. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New Jersey that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
95%
This home is often near full
Based on 38 residents and 40 beds. Source: state inspection report (Sep 2024)
Higher than the New Jersey average: 82.2%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
171
days
About This Community
Facility TypeLong Term Care Facility
StatusActive
ExpirationJune 30, 2027
License Number20016
CMS Certification Number315523
Continuing Care At Lantern Hill is legally operated by Lantern Hill, Inc., and administered by Arvid Agosto.
Owner NameLantern Hill, Inc.
OfficersPeople and entities with formal legal or financial responsibility for the organization that owns this community, as listed in New Jersey's licensing records.Arnold Speert; Mr. Bruce Beardsley; Mr. David Marr
Profit StatusNonprofit
Long Term Care
40 units
Total beds
40 units
Pets Allowed
Minimum Age62
Fitness Center
Aquatic Center
Walking Paths
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
70 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
13 points below the New Jersey average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Typical
53 severity-weighted points (6 deficiencies) · 18% lower than the typical CMS-certified NJ facility (median: 64)
Enforcement
Typical
1 enforcement action · above the typical CMS-certified NJ facility (median: 0) · $21,645 in fines
Persistence
Typical
29 days to fix issues · faster than the typical CMS-certified NJ facility (median: 33)
Total health inspections
3
↓ 27% · NJ 4.1This facility: 3, 27% below the NJ average of 4.1 (among NJ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
6
Rank #9 / 282Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 9th out of 282 nursing homes we track in New Jersey for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the New Jersey State average, with a ranking across all 282 NJ facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New Jersey that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 74% · NJ 22.7This facility: 6, 74% below the NJ average of 22.7 (among NJ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
2
Rank #6 / 282Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 6th out of 282 nursing homes we track in New Jersey for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the New Jersey mean across 282 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New Jersey that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 64% · NJ 5.59This facility: 2, 64% below the NJ average of 5.59 (among NJ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
6 of 6 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
1
↑ 43% · NJ 0.7This facility: 1, 43% above the NJ average of 0.7 (among NJ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · NJ 0.4This facility: 0, 100% below the NJ average of 0.4 (among NJ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
5
↓ 77% · NJ 21.3This facility: 5, 77% below the NJ average of 21.3 (among NJ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · NJ 0.4This facility: 0, 100% below the NJ average of 0.4 (among NJ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Jan 15, 2026 · 2 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Resident Assessment & Care Planning, 3 of 6 citations · 4 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Jan 15, 2026
2 citations
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Dec 23, 2025
1 citation
Pharmacy critical citation
Corrected
Corrected
Sep 12, 2024
3 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 6 citations
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
3 deficiencies (50%)
Quality of Life & Care
1 deficiency (17%)
Nutrition & Dietary
1 deficiency (17%)
Pharmacy Services
1 deficiency (17%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
5 of 6 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 1 of 6 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
1 penalty in the past 3 years
Latest: Dec 23, 2025 · $21,645 civil money penalty
Dec 23, 2025 · $21,645 civil money penalty
Total fines
$21,645
↓ 74% · NJ $84KThis facility: $21,645, 74% below the New Jersey average of $84,496. Average among the 144 New Jersey facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #198 / 282Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 198th out of 282 nursing homes we track in New Jersey for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the New Jersey average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 282 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New Jersey that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
1
↓ 47% · NJ 1.88This facility: 1, 47% below the New Jersey average of 1.88. Average among the 144 New Jersey facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
NJ avg 0.06New Jersey average: 0.06. Average among the 144 New Jersey facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Dec 23, 2025
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$21,645
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$21,645Fine amount comparison
This facility
$21,645
New Jersey average
$84,496
US average
$67,417
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. New Jersey and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the New Jersey average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 12% · NJ 4.5This facility: 5.0, 12% above the NJ average of 4.5 (among NJ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 31% · NJ 3.8This facility: 5.0, 31% above the NJ average of 3.8 (among NJ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
7.4
Score · lower is better
↑ 27% · NJ 5.8This facility: 7.4, 27% above the NJ average of 5.8 (among NJ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
12.5
Score · lower is better
↑ 14% · NJ 10.9This facility: 12.5, 14% above the NJ average of 10.9 (among NJ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 3 better, 6 worse, 2 near NJ average
8 short-stay measures: 3 better, 2 worse, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
10.1%
↑ 16% · NJ 8.7This facility: 10.1, 16% above the NJ average of 8.7 (among NJ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
10.1%
↑ 16% · NJ 8.7This facility: 10.1, 16% above the NJ average of 8.7 (among NJ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
9.9%
↑ 20% · NJ 8.2This facility: 9.9, 20% above the NJ average of 8.2 (among NJ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
9.9%
↑ 20% · NJ 8.2This facility: 9.9, 20% above the NJ average of 8.2 (among NJ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
17.5%
↑ 12% · NJ 15.6This facility: 17.5, 12% above the NJ average of 15.6 (among NJ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
17.5%
↑ 12% · NJ 15.6This facility: 17.5, 12% above the NJ average of 15.6 (among NJ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
↓ 100% · NJ 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the NJ average of 0.8 (among NJ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
↓ 100% · NJ 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the NJ average of 0.8 (among NJ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.9%
↑ 28% · NJ 2.3This facility: 2.9, 28% above the NJ average of 2.3 (among NJ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.9%
↑ 28% · NJ 2.3This facility: 2.9, 28% above the NJ average of 2.3 (among NJ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
9.8%
↑ 80% · NJ 5.4This facility: 9.8, 80% above the NJ average of 5.4 (among NJ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
9.8%
↑ 80% · NJ 5.4This facility: 9.8, 80% above the NJ average of 5.4 (among NJ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.2%
↓ 8% · NJ 4.6This facility: 4.2, 8% below the NJ average of 4.6 (among NJ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.2%
↓ 8% · NJ 4.6This facility: 4.2, 8% below the NJ average of 4.6 (among NJ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.8%
↓ 94% · NJ 12.1This facility: 0.8, 94% below the NJ average of 12.1 (among NJ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.8%
↓ 94% · NJ 12.1This facility: 0.8, 94% below the NJ average of 12.1 (among NJ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
15.6%
↑ 23% · NJ 12.7This facility: 15.6, 23% above the NJ average of 12.7 (among NJ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
15.6%
↑ 23% · NJ 12.7This facility: 15.6, 23% above the NJ average of 12.7 (among NJ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
94.2%
↑ 1% · NJ 93.0This facility: 94.2, 1% above the NJ average of 93.0 (among NJ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
94.2%
↑ 1% · NJ 93.0This facility: 94.2, 1% above the NJ average of 93.0 (among NJ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 3% · NJ 97.2This facility: 100.0, 3% above the NJ average of 97.2 (among NJ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 3% · NJ 97.2This facility: 100.0, 3% above the NJ average of 97.2 (among NJ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
50.0%
↓ 7% · US 53.7This facility: 50.0, 7% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
50.0%
↓ 7% · US 53.7This facility: 50.0, 7% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
58.8%
↑ 16% · US 50.6This facility: 58.8, 16% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
58.8%
↑ 16% · US 50.6This facility: 58.8, 16% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
2.1%
↑ 177% · US 0.8This facility: 2.1, 177% above the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
2.1%
↑ 177% · US 0.8This facility: 2.1, 177% above the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.5%
↑ 106% · NJ 1.2This facility: 2.5, 106% above the NJ average of 1.2 (among NJ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.5%
↑ 106% · NJ 1.2This facility: 2.5, 106% above the NJ average of 1.2 (among NJ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
87.7%
↑ 11% · NJ 79.0This facility: 87.7, 11% above the NJ average of 79.0 (among NJ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
87.7%
↑ 11% · NJ 79.0This facility: 87.7, 11% above the NJ average of 79.0 (among NJ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.0%
↑ 19% · NJ 80.1This facility: 95.0, 19% above the NJ average of 80.1 (among NJ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.0%
↑ 19% · NJ 80.1This facility: 95.0, 19% above the NJ average of 80.1 (among NJ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
34.8%
↑ 37% · NJ 25.4This facility: 34.8, 37% above the NJ average of 25.4 (among NJ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
34.8%
↑ 37% · NJ 25.4This facility: 34.8, 37% above the NJ average of 25.4 (among NJ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
6.6%
↓ 20% · NJ 8.2This facility: 6.6, 20% below the NJ average of 8.2 (among NJ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
6.6%
↓ 20% · NJ 8.2This facility: 6.6, 20% below the NJ average of 8.2 (among NJ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Continuing Care At Lantern Hill’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 271 New Jersey nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−586.2% operating margin
+114.1 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 7 of the last 7 reported years. Other income ($41.4M) trims the net loss to −$6.7M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends more on payroll than most New Jersey homes
219.9% payroll share of revenue
NJ average 52.8%Rank #3 / 271Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 3rd out of 271 nursing homes we track in New Jersey for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the New Jersey average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New Jersey that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $1.4M while revenue rose $0.8M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with New Jersey homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2018 → 2024Trend | NJ median | Compared with NJ homesRank in NJ | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $8.2M | +$0.8M | Trend 20182024 | NJ median $17.7M | Rank in NJ Rank #257 / 271Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 257th out of 271 nursing homes we track in New Jersey for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the New Jersey average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New Jersey that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 5% of homes | Below NJ median Higher net patient revenue than 5% of NJ homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $56.3M | −$3.0M | Trend 20182024 | NJ median — | Rank in NJ Not ranked | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$48.1M | +$3.8M | Trend 20182024 | NJ median — | Rank in NJ Not ranked | Loss, narrowing Resident care lost money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −586.2% | +114.1 pts | Trend 20182024 | NJ median — | Rank in NJ Not ranked | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $41.4M | — | Trend — | NJ median — | Rank in NJ Not ranked | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$6.7M | −$6.7M | Trend — | NJ median — | Rank in NJ Not ranked | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends more of revenue on staff than most New Jersey homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2018 → 2024Trend | NJ median | Compared with NJ homesRank in NJ | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $18.1M | +$1.4M | Trend 20182024 | NJ median $8.3M | Rank in NJ Rank #15 / 271Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 15th out of 271 nursing homes we track in New Jersey for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the New Jersey average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New Jersey that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 95% of homes | Top 5% in NJ by size Higher payroll than 95% of NJ homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 219.9% | −4.8 pts | Trend 20182024 | NJ median 48.8% | Rank in NJ Rank #3 / 271Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 3rd out of 271 nursing homes we track in New Jersey for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the New Jersey average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New Jersey that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 99% of homes | 167.1 pts over NJ average The NJ average is 52.8% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2018–2024 2 charts · NJ benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the New Jersey payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin NJ payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2018–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $4.7M | $5.7M | $5.0M | $5.9M | $6.7M | $7.4M | $8.2M |
| Operating expenses | $36.9M | $43.3M | $43.9M | $53.3M | $60.1M | $59.4M | $56.3M |
| Net patient income | −$32.2M | −$37.6M | −$38.9M | −$47.4M | −$53.5M | −$52.0M | −$48.1M |
| Operating margin | −682.3% | −659.7% | −781.3% | −799.0% | −803.3% | −700.3% | −586.2% |
| Net income | −$5.4M | −$4.7M | $1.6M | −$4.4M | −$6.6M | $0.0M | −$6.7M |
| Payroll costs | $10.4M | $12.1M | $13.0M | $13.1M | $15.0M | $16.7M | $18.1M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 220.0% | 212.4% | 262.1% | 221.2% | 224.8% | 224.7% | 219.9% |
| Beds | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 |
| Gross revenue | $5.7M | $6.3M | $5.3M | $6.2M | $6.9M | $7.9M | $8.5M |
| Salaries | $9.4M | $10.8M | $11.6M | $11.5M | $13.6M | $15.0M | $16.2M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.9M | $1.3M | $1.5M | $1.7M | $1.3M | $1.7M | $1.8M |
| Contract labor | — | — | — | — | $0.1M | $0.2M | $0.3M |
| Other operating costs | $26.5M | $31.2M | $30.8M | $40.2M | $45.2M | $42.7M | $38.3M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $539 | $467 | $464 | $478 | $493 | $532 | $579 |
| Cost per day | $4,219 | $3,546 | $4,087 | $4,300 | $4,452 | $4,254 | $3,972 |
| Average length of stay | 33.7 days | 62.1 days | 80.7 days | 73.3 days | 77.2 days | 101.9 days | 170.9 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 4 earlier years
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Arriving
83 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
43 · 52%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
40 · 48%
Leaving
83 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
30 · 36%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
53 · 64%
Mostly short-term rehab stays
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Places of interest near Continuing Care At Lantern Hill
0.1 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from New Providence's city center to Continuing Care At Lantern Hill's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Continuing Care At Lantern Hill
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around the area
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the NJ Dept. of Health (NJDOH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HC (Home Care):
Professional care delivered in the person's own home, from companionship to skilled nursing.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
ADC (Adult Day Care):
Daytime supervision, health monitoring, and social activities for seniors who live at home.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The New Jersey average is: 52.8% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parker At Somerset, Inc | NH ADC MC RC SNF | Somerset | 120
Facility
120
NJ AVG
142
Rank
#179 / 330 | A+ |
94.2%
Facility
94.2%
NJ AVG
82.2%
Rank
#44 / 291 | +15% | 6.15
Facility
6.15
NJ AVG
3.96
Rank
#7 / 277 | +40% | +55% | $0
Facility
$0
NJ AVG
$85.7k
Rank
#1 / 282 | 5
Facility
5
NJ AVG
22.7
Rank
#7 / 282 | 1.7
Facility
1.7
NJ AVG
5.6
Rank
#5 / 282 | - | 113 | A |
23
Facility
23
NJ AVG
52
Rank
#284 / 349 | Parker At Somerset, Inc | $15.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$15.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NJ AVG
$18.9M
Rank
#177 / 271 | $20.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$20.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NJ AVG
$9.2M
Rank
#10 / 271 | 130.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
130.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
NJ AVG
52.8%
Rank
#6 / 271 | 315253 | ||||
| Job Haines Home | NH AL HC RC SNF | Bloomfield | 40
Facility
40
NJ AVG
142
Rank
#319 / 330 | A+ |
97.5%
Facility
97.5%
NJ AVG
82.2%
Rank
#20 / 291 | +19% | 5.87
Facility
5.87
NJ AVG
3.96
Rank
#10 / 277 | -2% | +48% | $0
Facility
$0
NJ AVG
$85.7k
Rank
#1 / 282 | 4
Facility
4
NJ AVG
22.7
Rank
#5 / 282 | 1.3
Facility
1.3
NJ AVG
5.6
Rank
#3 / 282 | - | 39 | - |
85
Facility
85
NJ AVG
52
Rank
#51 / 349 | Job Haines Home For Aged People | $12.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$12.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NJ AVG
$18.9M
Rank
#225 / 271 | $12.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$12.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NJ AVG
$9.2M
Rank
#37 / 271 | 106.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
106.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
NJ AVG
52.8%
Rank
#9 / 271 | 315392 | ||||
| Bartley Healthcare Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | NH HOS MC PC RC SNF | Jackson Township (Bennetts Mills) | 234
Facility
234
NJ AVG
142
Rank
#31 / 330 | A |
84.6%
Facility
84.6%
NJ AVG
82.2%
Rank
#161 / 291 | +3% | 3.57
Facility
3.57
NJ AVG
3.96
Rank
#158 / 277 | -31% | -10% | $0
Facility
$0
NJ AVG
$85.7k
Rank
#1 / 282 | 11
Facility
11
NJ AVG
22.7
Rank
#34 / 282 | 2.8
Facility
2.8
NJ AVG
5.6
Rank
#24 / 282 | - | 198 | A+ |
19
Facility
19
NJ AVG
52
Rank
#296 / 349 | Bartley Operator | $33.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$33.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NJ AVG
$18.9M
Rank
#14 / 271 | $12.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$12.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NJ AVG
$9.2M
Rank
#43 / 271 | 36.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
36.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
NJ AVG
52.8%
Rank
#230 / 271 | 315288 | ||||
| The Jewish Home for Rehabilitation and Nursing | NH HOS MC PC RC SNF | Freehold | 150
Facility
150
NJ AVG
142
Rank
#125 / 330 | A+ |
91.3%
Facility
91.3%
NJ AVG
82.2%
Rank
#83 / 291 | +11% | 4.01
Facility
4.01
NJ AVG
3.96
Rank
#104 / 277 | +45% | +1% | $0
Facility
$0
NJ AVG
$85.7k
Rank
#1 / 282 | 14
Facility
14
NJ AVG
22.7
Rank
#53 / 282 | 3.5
Facility
3.5
NJ AVG
5.6
Rank
#48 / 282 | - | 137 | - |
88
Facility
88
NJ AVG
52
Rank
#34 / 349 | Jewish Healthcare Center, Inc | $23.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$23.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NJ AVG
$18.9M
Rank
#57 / 271 | $10.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$10.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NJ AVG
$9.2M
Rank
#82 / 271 | 44%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
44%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
NJ AVG
52.8%
Rank
#192 / 271 | 315528 | ||||
| Continuing Care At Lantern Hill | NH AL IL MC | New Providence | 40
Facility
40
NJ AVG
142
Rank
#319 / 330 | C- |
95.0%
Facility
95.0%
NJ AVG
82.2%
Rank
#39 / 291 | +16% | 6.04
Facility
6.04
NJ AVG
3.96
Rank
#6 / 277 | +61% | +53% | $21.6k
Facility
$21.6k
NJ AVG
$85.7k
Rank
#198 / 282 | 6
Facility
6
NJ AVG
22.7
Rank
#9 / 282 | 2.0
Facility
2.0
NJ AVG
5.6
Rank
#6 / 282 | 1 | 38 | - |
63
Facility
63
NJ AVG
52
Rank
#143 / 349 | Lantern Hill, Inc | $8.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NJ AVG
$18.9M
Rank
#257 / 271 | $18.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$18.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NJ AVG
$9.2M
Rank
#15 / 271 | 219.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
219.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
NJ AVG
52.8%
Rank
#3 / 271 | 315523 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other NJ nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Frequently Asked Questions about Continuing Care At Lantern Hill
Who is the owner of Continuing Care At Lantern Hill?
Continuing Care At Lantern Hill is legally operated by Lantern Hill, Inc., and administered by Arvid Agosto.
Is Continuing Care At Lantern Hill in a walkable area?
Continuing Care At Lantern Hill has a walk score of 63. Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
What is the license number of Continuing Care At Lantern Hill?
According to NJ state health department records, Continuing Care At Lantern Hill's license number is 20016.
When does Continuing Care At Lantern Hill's license expire?
According to NJ state health department records, Continuing Care At Lantern Hill's license expires on June 30, 2027.
What is the occupancy rate at Continuing Care At Lantern Hill?
Continuing Care At Lantern Hill's occupancy is 95%.
Are pets allowed at Continuing Care At Lantern Hill?
Yes, Continuing Care At Lantern Hill allows residents to bring their pets.
Does Continuing Care At Lantern Hill operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Continuing Care At Lantern Hill is registered as a non-profit in NJ.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Updated on
