Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
175
65 employees · 110 contractors · 43 on an average day Coryell County Memorial Hospital Authority
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Independent Living, Memory Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Gatesville, TX
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Coryell County Memorial Hospital Authority
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Independent Living, Memory Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Gatesville, TX
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Overview of Coryell County Memorial Hospital Authority
Coryell County Memorial Hospital Authority offers nursing home, assisted living, independent living, memory care, respite care, and skilled nursing in Gatesville, Texas. Nursing home and skilled nursing residents have residential support with licensed nursing care on site around the clock. Assisted living helps with dressing, bathing, medication, and other daily tasks while the resident keeps an apartment.
Independent living provides private living with community services and no daily care. Memory care offers a secured setting with supervision for someone at risk of wandering. Respite care is a short stay for a family whose usual caregiver needs to travel or recover. The range of care levels can suit a resident whose needs grow over time without requiring a move to a different community.
The community has 70 beds and is operated by Coryell Memorial Hospital Authority. Total nurse staffing is 4 hours and 45 minutes per resident each day, representing the total daily hands on nurse time available per resident. A Walk Score of 59 out of 100 places the area in the somewhat walkable band, so some errands can be done on foot and a resident who no longer drives may still complete some errands independently. Rehabilitation services and short term rehabilitation are available for a temporary stay focused on recovery rather than ongoing residence.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 23rd out of 234 nursing homes we track in Texas for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 45m
This nursing home is ranked 23rd out of 234 nursing homes we track in Texas for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 45mStandout metric: Certified nursing assistant is +50% above Texas average
1 of 6 metrics below Texas average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 6 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
6 staff · 10.3-hour shifts
24m
↓ 9% · TX 27mThis facility: 24m per resident per day, 9% below the Texas average of 27m (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 6 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
6 staff · 10.3-hour shiftsUS average: 42m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 42m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 51 total: 8 of the facility's own employees and 43 agency contractors.
51 staff · 9.1-hour shifts
1h 14m
↑ 28% · TX 58mThis facility: 1h 14m per resident per day, 28% above the Texas average of 58m (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 51 total: 8 of the facility's own employees and 43 agency contractors.
51 staff · 9.1-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 92 total: 26 of the facility's own employees and 66 agency contractors.
92 staff · 9.4-hour shifts
3h 7m
↑ 50% · TX 2h 4mThis facility: 3h 7m per resident per day, 50% above the Texas average of 2h 4m (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 92 total: 26 of the facility's own employees and 66 agency contractors.
92 staff · 9.4-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 24m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 24m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
6m
↑ 40% · TX 4mThis facility: 6m per resident per day, 40% above the Texas average of 4m (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
4h 28m
↑ 46% · TX 3h 4mThis facility: 4h 28m per resident per day, 46% above the Texas average of 3h 4m (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 31m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 31m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
23m
↑ 10% · TX 21mThis facility: 23m per resident per day, 10% above the Texas average of 21m (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
175
65 employees · 110 contractors · 43 on an average day
175 total staff / 98 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.79 : 1
↑ 24% · TX 1.44This facility: 1.79 staff per resident, 24% above the Texas average of 1.44 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
175 staff ÷ 98 residents
See full Texas ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8.9 h
↑ 10% · TX 8.1 hThis facility: 8.9 h, 10% above the Texas average of 8.1 h (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
35,106 staff hours this quarter
See full Texas ranking →73.4% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Texas average: 94.4% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (66), Licensed Practical Nurse (43), Medical Director (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
70
Rank #197 / 258Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 197th out of 258 nursing homes we track in Texas for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Texas facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
70
Rank #197 / 258Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 197th out of 258 nursing homes we track in Texas for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Texas facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Walk Score
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #66 / 278Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 66th out of 278 nursing homes we track in Texas for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Texas facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #66 / 278Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 66th out of 278 nursing homes we track in Texas for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Texas facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
59
/ 100
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
432
days
About This Community
Facility TypeType B
CountyCoryell
CMS Certification Number675886
Coryell County Memorial Hospital Authority is legally operated by Coryell County Memorial Hospital Authority.
Owner NameCoryell Memorial Hospital Authority
Short-Term Rehab
Cardiac RehabilitationA supervised program that helps people regain strength and endurance after heart problems or procedures, often including exercise and risk-factor education.
Pulmonary Rehabilitation
Cardiology
Dermatology Services
Dialysis
Neurology
Oncology
Pain Management
Podiatry Services
Telehealth Services
Urology
Wound Center
Advanced Wound Center
Medication ManagementSupport with organizing, administering, and monitoring medicines can help prevent missed or incorrect doses.
Pets not allowed
This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ. Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file — covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification surveys.
Inspection History
In Texas, the Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) is the primary regulatory body that conducts unannounced inspections and publishes quality reports for all long-term care homes.
Since 2025 · 1 year of data
These figures come from state-published data and the state inspection reports we hold on file. The period covered can vary depending on document availability.
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 0 citations 1 inspection
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 0 citations 1 inspection
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Texas state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Since 2025 vs. Texas state average
Overall vs. TX average
0 Worse
No metrics in this bucket.
1 At Avg
Metrics at Texas average:
• Inspections with citations (at TX avg) 1 Better Metrics better than Texas average:
• Total citations (100% below)
• Inspections with citations (at TX avg) 1 Better Metrics better than Texas average:
• Total citations (100% below)
Citations
| This Facility | TX Average | vs. TX Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total citations
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 0 | 8.0 | This facility has 100% fewer total citations than a typical Texas nursing home (0 vs. TX avg 8).↓ 100% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | TX Average | vs. TX Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Inspections with citations
Inspections that resulted in at least one regulatory citation.
| 1 | 1.0 | This facility has inspections with citations in line with the Texas average (1 vs. TX avg 1).— At avg |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Total health inspections
7
↓ 11% · TX 7.9This facility: 7, 11% below the TX average of 7.9 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
17
Rank #61 / 235Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 61st out of 235 nursing homes we track in Texas for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Texas State average, with a ranking across all 235 TX facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 39% · TX 27.7This facility: 17, 39% below the TX average of 27.7 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
2.43
Rank #42 / 235Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 42nd out of 235 nursing homes we track in Texas for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Texas mean across 235 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 33% · TX 3.65This facility: 2.43, 33% below the TX average of 3.65 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
17 of 17 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · TX 1.9This facility: 0, 100% below the TX average of 1.9 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · TX 0.4This facility: 0, 100% below the TX average of 0.4 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
17
↓ 32% · TX 24.9This facility: 17, 32% below the TX average of 24.9 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · TX 0.4This facility: 0, 100% below the TX average of 0.4 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Feb 12, 2026 · 3 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Pharmacy Services, 6 of 17 citations · 6 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Feb 12, 2026
3 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Feb 04, 2026
1 citation
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Sep 09, 2025
3 citations
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 27, 2024
3 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
May 08, 2024
1 citation
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Sep 28, 2023
5 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Sep 08, 2023
1 citation
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 17 citations
Pharmacy Services
6 deficiencies (35%)
Quality of Life & Care
3 deficiencies (18%)
Nutrition & Dietary
3 deficiencies (18%)
Resident Rights
2 deficiencies (12%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
2 deficiencies (12%)
Infection Control
1 deficiency (6%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
11 of 17 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 6 of 17 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials were reported in the last 3 years.
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Texas average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
1
/ 5
Significantly below average
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
3
/ 5
Average
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
16.9
Score · lower is better
↑ 114% · TX 7.9This facility: 16.9, 114% above the TX average of 7.9 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
30.7
Score · lower is better
↑ 112% · TX 14.5This facility: 30.7, 112% above the TX average of 14.5 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 3 better, 6 worse, 1 near TX average, 1 without a benchmark
3 short-stay measures: 1 better, 2 worse
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
37.2%
↑ 135% · TX 15.8This facility: 37.2, 135% above the TX average of 15.8 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
37.2%
↑ 135% · TX 15.8This facility: 37.2, 135% above the TX average of 15.8 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
35.5%
↑ 154% · TX 14.0This facility: 35.5, 154% above the TX average of 14.0 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
35.5%
↑ 154% · TX 14.0This facility: 35.5, 154% above the TX average of 14.0 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
19.4%
↑ 45% · TX 13.4This facility: 19.4, 45% above the TX average of 13.4 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
19.4%
↑ 45% · TX 13.4This facility: 19.4, 45% above the TX average of 13.4 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.2%
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.2%
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7.3%
↑ 121% · TX 3.3This facility: 7.3, 121% above the TX average of 3.3 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7.3%
↑ 121% · TX 3.3This facility: 7.3, 121% above the TX average of 3.3 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.0%
↓ 48% · TX 3.8This facility: 2.0, 48% below the TX average of 3.8 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.0%
↓ 48% · TX 3.8This facility: 2.0, 48% below the TX average of 3.8 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.8%
↓ 9% · TX 3.0This facility: 2.8, 9% below the TX average of 3.0 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.8%
↓ 9% · TX 3.0This facility: 2.8, 9% below the TX average of 3.0 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.0%
↓ 59% · TX 2.4This facility: 1.0, 59% below the TX average of 2.4 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.0%
↓ 59% · TX 2.4This facility: 1.0, 59% below the TX average of 2.4 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.7%
↑ 43% · TX 9.6This facility: 13.7, 43% above the TX average of 9.6 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.7%
↑ 43% · TX 9.6This facility: 13.7, 43% above the TX average of 9.6 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
91.8%
↓ 5% · TX 96.5This facility: 91.8, 5% below the TX average of 96.5 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
91.8%
↓ 5% · TX 96.5This facility: 91.8, 5% below the TX average of 96.5 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 2% · TX 98.0This facility: 100.0, 2% above the TX average of 98.0 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 2% · TX 98.0This facility: 100.0, 2% above the TX average of 98.0 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 3 measures
Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.9%
↑ 30% · TX 1.5This facility: 1.9, 30% above the TX average of 1.5 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.9%
↑ 30% · TX 1.5This facility: 1.9, 30% above the TX average of 1.5 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
70.5%
↓ 21% · TX 88.9This facility: 70.5, 21% below the TX average of 88.9 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
70.5%
↓ 21% · TX 88.9This facility: 70.5, 21% below the TX average of 88.9 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
93.8%
↑ 7% · TX 88.0This facility: 93.8, 7% above the TX average of 88.0 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
93.8%
↑ 7% · TX 88.0This facility: 93.8, 7% above the TX average of 88.0 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Facility Characteristics
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jun 2026)
Total residents
98
Medicare
20
20.4% of residents
Medicaid
56
57.1% of residents
Private pay or other
22
22.4% of residents
Programs & Services
Residents Group
Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Nurse Aide Training
State-approved Nurse Aide Training and Competency Evaluation Program on-site
Active Resident Council
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Financial Trends
Historical financial and operational data for Coryell County Memorial Hospital Authority from 2012–2025, based on CMS SNF Cost Reports. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Key figures below are for fiscal year ending in 07/2025.
Net Patient Income
-$1.3M
↓ ~$463.6K vs 2024
Payroll Costs
$6.6M
↑ ~$365.8K vs 2024
Operating Margin
-15.7%
↓ 5.7pp vs 2024
Finances and operations
Based on CMS SNF Cost Report for fiscal year ending in 07/2025.
Government
Operated by a hospital district.
Net patient revenue
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
$8.4MFiscal year ending 07/2025
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
-$1.3MFiscal year ending 07/2025
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Government
Operated by a hospital district.
Net patient revenue
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
$8.4MFiscal year ending 07/2025 Rank #112 / 218Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 112th out of 218 nursing homes we track in Texas. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Texas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
-$1.3MFiscal year ending 07/2025
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Payroll costs
Staff salaries plus wage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement — from the home's own accounting records (CMS cost report, Worksheet A). Contract or agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs.
Rank #56 / 218Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 56th out of 218 nursing homes we track in Texas. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Texas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
$6.6MFiscal year ending 07/2025
78.1% of net patient revenue
Staff salaries plus wage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement — from the home's own accounting records (CMS cost report, Worksheet A). Contract or agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs.
Rank #56 / 218Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 56th out of 218 nursing homes we track in Texas. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Texas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll as a share of revenue: staff salaries and wage-related benefits divided by net patient revenue. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay.
Rank #40 / 199Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 40th out of 199 nursing homes we track in Texas. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Texas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Other operating costs
Everything it costs to run the home apart from payroll — food, utilities, supplies, maintenance, contract labor and administration. Calculated as total operating expense minus payroll (staff salaries and wage-related benefits).
$3.2MFiscal year ending 07/2025
Everything it costs to run the home apart from payroll — food, utilities, supplies, maintenance, contract labor and administration. Calculated as total operating expense minus payroll (staff salaries and wage-related benefits).
Total costs
The home's total operating expense for the year — all the costs of running it, salaries included (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3).
$9.7MFiscal year ending 07/2025
The home's total operating expense for the year — all the costs of running it, salaries included (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3).
Places of interest near Coryell County Memorial Hospital Authority
0.0 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Gatesville's city center to Coryell County Memorial Hospital Authority's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Coryell County Memorial Hospital Authority
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around the area
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the TX Health & Human Services Commission (HHSC), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HC (Home Care):
Professional care delivered in the person's own home, from companionship to skilled nursing.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
ADC (Adult Day Care):
Daytime supervision, health monitoring, and social activities for seniors who live at home.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Texas average is: 71.8% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of Harlingen | NH MC RC SNF | Harlingen | 154
Facility
154
TX AVG
107
Rank
#27 / 258 |
87.3%
Facility
87.3%
TX AVG
71.6%
Rank
#34 / 174 | +22% | 3.02
Facility
3.02
TX AVG
3.49
Rank
#184 / 234 | -14% | -14% | $0
Facility
$0
TX AVG
$66.1k
Rank
#1 / 237 | 17
Facility
17
TX AVG
27.7
Rank
#61 / 235 | 2.4
Facility
2.4
TX AVG
3.6
Rank
#42 / 235 | - | 134 | - |
44
Facility
44
TX AVG
44
Rank
#142 / 278 | Starr County Hospital District | $12.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$12.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
TX AVG
$9.3M
Rank
#58 / 218 | $5.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
TX AVG
$5.4M
Rank
#122 / 218 | 40.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
40.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
TX AVG
71.8%
Rank
#173 / 199 | 455822 | ||||
| Meadow Lake Senior Living – Tyler | NH AL IL MC RC SNF | Tyler | 20
Facility
20
TX AVG
107
Rank
#253 / 258 | - | - | 4.11
Facility
4.11
TX AVG
3.49
Rank
#47 / 234 | +156% | +18% | $0
Facility
$0
TX AVG
$66.1k
Rank
#1 / 237 | 4
Facility
4
TX AVG
27.7
Rank
#3 / 235 | 1.3
Facility
1.3
TX AVG
3.6
Rank
#2 / 235 | - | 28 | A+ |
33
Facility
33
TX AVG
44
Rank
#196 / 278 | Robbin Bell | $10.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$10.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
TX AVG
$9.3M
Rank
#75 / 218 | $5.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
TX AVG
$5.4M
Rank
#99 / 218 | 56%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
56%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
TX AVG
71.8%
Rank
#140 / 199 | 676286 | ||||
| James L. West Center for Dementia Care | NH ADC HC MC RC SNF | Fort Worth | 112
Facility
112
TX AVG
107
Rank
#148 / 258 |
93.8%
Facility
93.8%
TX AVG
71.6%
Rank
#12 / 174 | +31% | 5.44
Facility
5.44
TX AVG
3.49
Rank
#13 / 234 | -37% | +56% | $63.2k
Facility
$63.2k
TX AVG
$66.1k
Rank
#185 / 237 | 17
Facility
17
TX AVG
27.7
Rank
#61 / 235 | 2.8
Facility
2.8
TX AVG
3.6
Rank
#70 / 235 | 8 | 105 | - |
73
Facility
73
TX AVG
44
Rank
#24 / 278 | James L West Presbyterian Special Care Center | $15.1MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$15.1MFiscal year ending 06/2025
TX AVG
$9.3M
Rank
#32 / 218 | $10.6MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$10.6MFiscal year ending 06/2025
TX AVG
$5.4M
Rank
#18 / 218 | 70.2%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
70.2%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
TX AVG
71.8%
Rank
#30 / 199 | 745019 | ||||
| Coryell County Memorial Hospital Authority | NH AL IL MC RC SNF | Gatesville | 70
Facility
70
TX AVG
107
Rank
#197 / 258 | - | - | 4.76
Facility
4.76
TX AVG
3.49
Rank
#23 / 234 | -56% | +36% | $0
Facility
$0
TX AVG
$66.1k
Rank
#1 / 237 | 17
Facility
17
TX AVG
27.7
Rank
#61 / 235 | 2.4
Facility
2.4
TX AVG
3.6
Rank
#42 / 235 | - | 97 | - |
59
Facility
59
TX AVG
44
Rank
#66 / 278 | Coryell Memorial Hospital Authority | $8.4MFiscal year ending 07/2025
Facility
$8.4MFiscal year ending 07/2025
TX AVG
$9.3M
Rank
#112 / 218 | $6.6MFiscal year ending 07/2025
Facility
$6.6MFiscal year ending 07/2025
TX AVG
$5.4M
Rank
#56 / 218 | 78.1%Fiscal year ending 07/2025
Facility
78.1%Fiscal year ending 07/2025
TX AVG
71.8%
Rank
#40 / 199 | 675886 | ||||
| Cityview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | NH HC HOS MC RC SNF | Fort Worth | 210
Facility
210
TX AVG
107
Rank
#6 / 258 |
87.8%
Facility
87.8%
TX AVG
71.6%
Rank
#30 / 174 | +23% | 3.33
Facility
3.33
TX AVG
3.49
Rank
#121 / 234 | +7% | -5% | $234.0k
Facility
$234.0k
TX AVG
$66.1k
Rank
#232 / 237 | 41
Facility
41
TX AVG
27.7
Rank
#198 / 235 | 3.4
Facility
3.4
TX AVG
3.6
Rank
#135 / 235 | 4 | 184 | - |
56
Facility
56
TX AVG
44
Rank
#74 / 278 | Decatur Hospital Authority | $18.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$18.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
TX AVG
$9.3M
Rank
#27 / 218 | $9.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$9.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
TX AVG
$5.4M
Rank
#31 / 218 | 54%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
54%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
TX AVG
71.8%
Rank
#87 / 199 | 675622 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other TX nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Frequently Asked Questions about Coryell County Memorial Hospital Authority
Who is the owner of Coryell County Memorial Hospital Authority?
Coryell County Memorial Hospital Authority is legally operated by Coryell Memorial Hospital Authority.
Is Coryell County Memorial Hospital Authority in a walkable area?
Coryell County Memorial Hospital Authority has a walk score of 59. Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
What is the occupancy rate at Coryell County Memorial Hospital Authority?
Coryell County Memorial Hospital Authority's occupancy is 91.5%.
Are pets allowed at Coryell County Memorial Hospital Authority?
No, Coryell County Memorial Hospital Authority has a no-pet policy.
Is Coryell County Memorial Hospital Authority a government-operated facility?
Coryell County Memorial Hospital Authority is a government-operated nursing facility in TX.
What is the overall rating for Coryell County Memorial Hospital Authority?
Coryell County Memorial Hospital Authority received a 4-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
How many beds does Coryell County Memorial Hospital Authority have?
Coryell County Memorial Hospital Authority has 70 beds.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Updated on
