Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
229
117 employees · 112 contractors · 45 on an average day Delmar Gardens of Creve Coeur
Nursing Home, Assisted Living & Independent Living · Creve Coeur, MO
CMS overall rating
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Delmar Gardens of Creve Coeur
Nursing Home, Assisted Living & Independent Living · Creve Coeur, MO
CMS overall rating
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Delmar Gardens of Creve Coeur accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Delmar Gardens of Creve Coeur provides independent living, assisted living, memory care, and 24-hour skilled nursing care in Creve Coeur, Missouri. Serving residents since 1965, the Delmar Gardens of Creve Coeur Operating property maintains 148 beds divided between private and semi-private layouts. Independent living offers private accommodations without daily care, assisted living aides step in with personal tasks and medications, and the secured memory neighborhood oversees individuals at risk of wandering. Licensed nurses deliver round-the-clock clinical supervision, recording an average daily nurse staffing ratio of 3 hours and 12 minutes per resident. Families seeking temporary relief can schedule short-term respite stays, and short-term rehabilitation supports patients during post-hospital recovery.
Medical resources include pharmacy services and wound care management. Residents also have access to outdoor garden spaces and organized transportation for local appointments and outings. Payment channels include private pay, Medicare for qualifying short-term clinical rehabilitation, and Medicaid for eligible long-term stays.
Prospective individuals evaluating long-term or post-rehabilitation options can reach out to Delmar Gardens of Creve Coeur to confirm room availability and schedule a walkthrough.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 191st out of 275 nursing homes we track in Missouri for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 12m
This nursing home is ranked 191st out of 275 nursing homes we track in Missouri for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 12m5 of 6 metrics below Missouri average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 4 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
4 staff · 7.2-hour shifts
9m
↓ 69% · MO 30mThis facility: 9m per resident per day, 69% below the Missouri average of 30m (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 4 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
4 staff · 7.2-hour shiftsUS average: 42m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 42m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 60 total: 13 of the facility's own employees and 47 agency contractors.
60 staff · 9-hour shifts
34m
↓ 20% · MO 43mThis facility: 34m per resident per day, 20% below the Missouri average of 43m (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 60 total: 13 of the facility's own employees and 47 agency contractors.
60 staff · 9-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 100 total: 64 of the facility's own employees and 36 agency contractors.
100 staff · 8.8-hour shifts
2h 29m
↑ 2% · MO 2h 26mThis facility: 2h 29m per resident per day, 2% above the Missouri average of 2h 26m (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 100 total: 64 of the facility's own employees and 36 agency contractors.
100 staff · 8.8-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 26m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation. All 3 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
3 staff · 6.9-hour shifts
2m
↓ 33% · MO 3mThis facility: 2m per resident per day, 33% below the Missouri average of 3m (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation. All 3 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
3 staff · 6.9-hour shiftsUS average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
2h 37m
↓ 18% · MO 3h 11mThis facility: 2h 37m per resident per day, 18% below the Missouri average of 3h 11m (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 32m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 32m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
8m
↓ 58% · MO 20mThis facility: 8m per resident per day, 58% below the Missouri average of 20m (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
229
117 employees · 112 contractors · 45 on an average day
229 total staff / 100 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
2.29 : 1
↑ 46% · MO 1.57This facility: 2.29 staff per resident, 46% above the Missouri average of 1.57 (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
229 staff ÷ 100 residents
See full Missouri ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8.4 h
↑ 4% · MO 8.1 hThis facility: 8.4 h, 4% above the Missouri average of 8.1 h (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
34,237 staff hours this quarter
See full Missouri ranking →90.4% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Missouri average: 92.6% · Contractors this quarter: Licensed Practical Nurse (47), Certified Nursing Assistant (36), Medication Aide/Technician (6), Therapeutic Recreation Specialist (5), Qualified Social Worker (4), Respiratory Therapy Technician (4), Physical Therapy Assistant (3), Clinical Nurse Specialist (2), Physical Therapy Aide (2), Occupational Therapy Assistant (2), Administrator (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
148
Rank #53 / 287Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 53rd out of 287 nursing homes we track in Missouri for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Missouri facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
148
Rank #53 / 287Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 53rd out of 287 nursing homes we track in Missouri for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Missouri facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
Walk Score
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #251 / 294Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 251st out of 294 nursing homes we track in Missouri for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Missouri facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #251 / 294Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 251st out of 294 nursing homes we track in Missouri for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Missouri facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
26
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #195 / 265Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 195th out of 265 nursing homes we track in Missouri for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Missouri average, with its Statewide rank out of 265. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #195 / 265Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 195th out of 265 nursing homes we track in Missouri for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Missouri average, with its Statewide rank out of 265. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
60.1%
This home usually has availability
Based on 89 residents and 148 beds. Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Lower than the Missouri average: 69.5%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
112
days
About This Community
CountySaint Louis County
Business TypeLIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
Delmar Gardens of Creve Coeur is legally operated by Delmar Gardens Of Creve Coeur Operating, LLC.
Corporate EntityDELMAR GARDENS OF CREVE COEUR OPERATING, LLC
Resident Council
Secured Perimeter
Grab Bars
CNA Training Program
Short-Term Rehab
Short-Term Rehabilitation
Wound CareCare for wounds such as pressure sores, surgical wounds, or ulcers, including assessment, dressing changes, and monitoring for infection.
Hospice & Palliative Care
Respite CareRespite care provides families and unpaid caregivers with short-term relief from caregiving duties. Care can range from a few hours to a few weeks.
Housekeeping
Transportation
Garden
Building TypeSingle-story
Room Types
Private
Shared Rooms
CMS Health Inspection History
Total health inspections
8
↑ 21% · MO 6.6This facility: 8, 21% above the Missouri average of 6.6 (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
29
Rank #80 / 277Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 80th out of 277 nursing homes we track in Missouri for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Missouri State average, with a ranking across all 277 MO facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 20% · MO 36.1This facility: 29, 20% below the Missouri average of 36.1 (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
3.62
Rank #27 / 277Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 27th out of 277 nursing homes we track in Missouri for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Missouri mean across 277 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 35% · MO 5.61This facility: 3.62, 35% below the Missouri average of 5.61 (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
79% corrected
23 of 29 citations corrected · 6 still open
Critical
J–L
1
↑ 67% · MO 0.6This facility: 1, 67% above the Missouri average of 0.6 (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
0% corrected · 1 open
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
1
↓ 9% · MO 1.1This facility: 1, 9% below the Missouri average of 1.1 (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
100% corrected
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
27
↓ 19% · MO 33.3This facility: 27, 19% below the Missouri average of 33.3 (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
81% corrected · 5 open
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · MO 1.1This facility: 0, 100% below the Missouri average of 1.1 (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Jul 17, 2026 · 1 citation (Care Planning, moderate), corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 11 of 29 citations · 8 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Jul 17, 2026
1 citation
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jun 03, 2026
7 citations
Quality of Care critical citation
Resident Rights moderate citation
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Care Planning moderate citation
Feb 26, 2026
4 citations
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jun 18, 2025
5 citations
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Feb 04, 2025
1 citation
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Oct 04, 2024
2 citations
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Sep 20, 2023
3 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Sep 27, 2019
6 citations
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 29 citations
Quality of Life & Care
11 deficiencies (38%)
Resident Rights
5 deficiencies (17%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
5 deficiencies (17%)
Pharmacy Services
3 deficiencies (10%)
Infection Control
2 deficiencies (7%)
Nutrition & Dietary
1 deficiency (3%)
Administration
1 deficiency (3%)
Environmental
1 deficiency (3%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
13 of 29 citations resulted from standard inspections; 15 of 29 resulted from complaint investigations; and 1 of 29 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Oct 2023.
Total fines
$0
MO avg $84KMissouri average: $83,906. Average among the 213 Missouri facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
MO avg 1.79Missouri average: 1.79. Average among the 213 Missouri facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
MO avg 0.72Missouri average: 0.72. Average among the 213 Missouri facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Missouri average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
3
/ 5
Average
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
1
/ 5
Significantly below average
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
8.4
Score · lower is better
↓ 10% · MO 9.3This facility: 8.4, 10% below the MO average of 9.3 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
18.1
Score · lower is better
↑ 8% · MO 16.8This facility: 18.1, 8% above the MO average of 16.8 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 6 better, 2 worse, 3 near MO average
3 short-stay measures: 1 better, 2 worse
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
14.8%
↓ 15% · MO 17.4This facility: 14.8, 15% below the MO average of 17.4 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
14.8%
↓ 15% · MO 17.4This facility: 14.8, 15% below the MO average of 17.4 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
14.5%
↓ 8% · MO 15.8This facility: 14.5, 8% below the MO average of 15.8 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
14.5%
↓ 8% · MO 15.8This facility: 14.5, 8% below the MO average of 15.8 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
24.9%
↑ 46% · MO 17.0This facility: 24.9, 46% above the MO average of 17.0 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
24.9%
↑ 46% · MO 17.0This facility: 24.9, 46% above the MO average of 17.0 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.3%
↓ 85% · MO 2.2This facility: 0.3, 85% below the MO average of 2.2 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.3%
↓ 85% · MO 2.2This facility: 0.3, 85% below the MO average of 2.2 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.6%
↓ 11% · MO 4.0This facility: 3.6, 11% below the MO average of 4.0 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.6%
↓ 11% · MO 4.0This facility: 3.6, 11% below the MO average of 4.0 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.7%
↑ 6% · MO 4.5This facility: 4.7, 6% above the MO average of 4.5 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.7%
↑ 6% · MO 4.5This facility: 4.7, 6% above the MO average of 4.5 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.3%
↓ 16% · MO 5.1This facility: 4.3, 16% below the MO average of 5.1 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.3%
↓ 16% · MO 5.1This facility: 4.3, 16% below the MO average of 5.1 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.2%
↓ 94% · MO 20.0This facility: 1.2, 94% below the MO average of 20.0 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.2%
↓ 94% · MO 20.0This facility: 1.2, 94% below the MO average of 20.0 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
22.9%
↓ 3% · MO 23.5This facility: 22.9, 3% below the MO average of 23.5 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
22.9%
↓ 3% · MO 23.5This facility: 22.9, 3% below the MO average of 23.5 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
86.7%
↑ 3% · MO 84.0This facility: 86.7, 3% above the MO average of 84.0 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
86.7%
↑ 3% · MO 84.0This facility: 86.7, 3% above the MO average of 84.0 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
92.9%
↑ 2% · MO 90.8This facility: 92.9, 2% above the MO average of 90.8 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
92.9%
↑ 2% · MO 90.8This facility: 92.9, 2% above the MO average of 90.8 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 3 measures
Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.9%
↓ 9% · MO 2.1This facility: 1.9, 9% below the MO average of 2.1 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.9%
↓ 9% · MO 2.1This facility: 1.9, 9% below the MO average of 2.1 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
46.9%
↓ 29% · MO 65.8This facility: 46.9, 29% below the MO average of 65.8 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
46.9%
↓ 29% · MO 65.8This facility: 46.9, 29% below the MO average of 65.8 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
40.7%
↓ 34% · MO 61.5This facility: 40.7, 34% below the MO average of 61.5 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
40.7%
↓ 34% · MO 61.5This facility: 40.7, 34% below the MO average of 61.5 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Delmar Gardens of Creve Coeur’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending March 2025, compared with 270 Missouri nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Mar 2025
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, and more than last year
−10.6% operating margin
−5.5 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 8 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($0.3M) trims the net loss to −$0.8M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Payroll in line with Missouri homes
57.5% payroll share of revenue
MO average 55.0%Rank #96 / 270Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 96th out of 270 nursing homes we track in Missouri for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Missouri average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.1M while revenue fell $0.7M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2025 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2025 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Missouri homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2025 | vs prior year | Trend 2018 → 2025Trend | MO median | Compared with MO homesRank in MO | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $10.3M | −$0.7M | Trend 20182025 | MO median $6.2M | Rank in MO Rank #63 / 270Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 63rd out of 270 nursing homes we track in Missouri for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Missouri average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 77% of homes | Above MO median Higher net patient revenue than 77% of MO homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $11.4M | −$0.2M | Trend 20182025 | MO median $6.5M | Rank in MO Rank #51 / 270Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 51st out of 270 nursing homes we track in Missouri for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Missouri homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 81% of homes | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$1.1M | −$0.5M | Trend 20182025 | MO median −$0.1M | Rank in MO Rank #238 / 270Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 238th out of 270 nursing homes we track in Missouri for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Missouri homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 12% of homes | Loss, widening Resident care lost money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −10.6% | −5.5 pts | Trend 20182025 | MO median −1.4% | Rank in MO Rank #204 / 270Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 204th out of 270 nursing homes we track in Missouri for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Missouri homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 25% of homes | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.3M | — | Trend — | MO median $0.0M | Rank in MO Rank #32 / 264Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 32nd out of 264 nursing homes we track in Missouri for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Missouri homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 88% of homes | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$0.8M | −$0.6M | Trend — | MO median $0.0M | Rank in MO Rank #237 / 270Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 237th out of 270 nursing homes we track in Missouri for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Missouri homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 12% of homes | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Staff spending in line with Missouri homes
| Metric | FY 2025 | vs prior year | Trend 2018 → 2025Trend | MO median | Compared with MO homesRank in MO | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $5.9M | +$0.1M | Trend 20182025 | MO median $3.5M | Rank in MO Rank #44 / 270Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 44th out of 270 nursing homes we track in Missouri for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Missouri average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 84% of homes | Above MO median Higher payroll than 84% of MO homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 57.5% | +4.1 pts | Trend 20182025 | MO median 52.4% | Rank in MO Rank #96 / 270Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 96th out of 270 nursing homes we track in Missouri for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Missouri average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 65% of homes | Near MO average The MO average is 55.0% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2018–2025 2 charts · MO benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Missouri payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin MO payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2018–2025 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $8.7M | $8.9M | $9.3M | $8.9M | $8.6M | $9.3M | $11.0M | $10.3M |
| Operating expenses | $9.1M | $9.1M | $9.5M | $9.7M | $9.2M | $10.7M | $11.5M | $11.4M |
| Net patient income | −$0.4M | −$0.2M | −$0.2M | −$0.8M | −$0.6M | −$1.4M | −$0.6M | −$1.1M |
| Operating margin | −5.0% | −2.4% | −2.7% | −9.3% | −6.6% | −15.0% | −5.1% | −10.6% |
| Net income | −$0.3M | $0.0M | −$0.1M | $0.2M | −$0.0M | −$0.8M | −$0.2M | −$0.8M |
| Payroll costs | $4.9M | $4.9M | $5.0M | $5.0M | $4.6M | $5.3M | $5.9M | $5.9M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 56.3% | 55.4% | 53.4% | 56.4% | 53.7% | 57.5% | 53.4% | 57.5% |
| Beds | 132 | 132 | 148 | 148 | 148 | 148 | 148 | 148 |
| Gross revenue | $12.7M | $13.2M | $13.6M | $12.8M | $12.7M | $13.4M | $14.3M | $12.6M |
| Salaries | $4.1M | $4.1M | $4.3M | $4.0M | $3.9M | $4.6M | $5.0M | $5.1M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.8M | $0.8M | $0.7M | $1.0M | $0.7M | $0.7M | $0.8M | $0.8M |
| Contract labor | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other operating costs | $4.2M | $4.2M | $4.6M | $4.7M | $4.6M | $5.3M | $5.7M | $5.5M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $217 | $217 | $223 | $243 | $239 | $243 | $291 | $295 |
| Cost per day | $228 | $222 | $229 | $265 | $255 | $280 | $306 | $326 |
| Average length of stay | 28.0 days | 32.5 days | 17.3 days | 88.9 days | 94.6 days | 97.5 days | 105.9 days | 111.6 days |
Showing 2025–2023 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2025
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
311 admissions · FY2025
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
21 · 7%
Medicaid
161 · 52%
Private pay & other
129 · 41%
Resident snapshot
100 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
7 · 7%
Medicaid
77 · 77%
Private pay & other
16 · 16%
Leaving
313 discharges · FY2025
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
12 · 4%
Medicaid
175 · 56%
Private pay & other
126 · 40%
Mostly long-term care residents
Most residents stay for extended periods and receive ongoing daily care.
Places of interest near Delmar Gardens of Creve Coeur
850 Country Manor Ln, Creve Coeur, MO 63141
Calculate Travel Distance to Delmar Gardens of Creve Coeur
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Creve Coeur
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the MO Dept. of Health & Senior Services (DHSS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
ADC (Adult Day Care):
Daytime supervision, health monitoring, and social activities for seniors who live at home.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Missouri average is: 55.0% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Surrey Place St Luke’s Hospital Skilled Nursing | NH SNF | Chesterfield | 130
Facility
130
MO AVG
112
Rank
#66 / 287 |
62.2%
Facility
62.2%
MO AVG
69.5%
Rank
#177 / 265 | -11% | 4.82
Facility
4.82
MO AVG
3.65
Rank
#30 / 275 | +137% | +32% | $0
Facility
$0
MO AVG
$89.7k
Rank
#1 / 278 | 13
Facility
13
MO AVG
36.1
Rank
#36 / 277 | 3.3
Facility
3.3
MO AVG
5.6
Rank
#29 / 277 | - | 81 | - |
39
Facility
39
MO AVG
50
Rank
#198 / 294 | St Luke's Episcopal-Presbyterian Hospital | - | - | - | 265414 | ||||
| Delmar Gardens of O’fallon | NH ADC AL MC SNF | O'fallon | 240
Facility
240
MO AVG
112
Rank
#4 / 287 |
62.5%
Facility
62.5%
MO AVG
69.5%
Rank
#176 / 265 | -10% | 4.98
Facility
4.98
MO AVG
3.65
Rank
#22 / 275 | -37% | +36% | $0
Facility
$0
MO AVG
$89.7k
Rank
#1 / 278 | 40
Facility
40
MO AVG
36.1
Rank
#183 / 277 | 5.0
Facility
5.0
MO AVG
5.6
Rank
#167 / 277 | 1 | 150 | - |
65
Facility
65
MO AVG
50
Rank
#80 / 294 | Delmar Gardens Of O'fallon, LLC | $19.3MFiscal year ending 03/2025
Facility
$19.3MFiscal year ending 03/2025
MO AVG
$8.1M
Rank
#6 / 270 | $10.9MFiscal year ending 03/2025
Facility
$10.9MFiscal year ending 03/2025
MO AVG
$4.2M
Rank
#9 / 270 | 56.2%Fiscal year ending 03/2025
Facility
56.2%Fiscal year ending 03/2025
MO AVG
55%
Rank
#108 / 270 | 265792 | ||||
| Abbey Senior Health | NH AL HOS IL PC RC SNF | O'fallon | 65
Facility
65
MO AVG
112
Rank
#238 / 287 |
75.4%
Facility
75.4%
MO AVG
69.5%
Rank
#104 / 265 | +8% | 5.11
Facility
5.11
MO AVG
3.65
Rank
#18 / 275 | -48% | +40% | $0
Facility
$0
MO AVG
$89.7k
Rank
#1 / 278 | 27
Facility
27
MO AVG
36.1
Rank
#128 / 277 | 5.4
Facility
5.4
MO AVG
5.6
Rank
#115 / 277 | 1 | 49 | - |
65
Facility
65
MO AVG
50
Rank
#80 / 294 | Mount Carmel Communities-O'fallon, LLC | $7.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MO AVG
$8.1M
Rank
#106 / 270 | $5.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MO AVG
$4.2M
Rank
#60 / 270 | 70%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
70%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MO AVG
55%
Rank
#21 / 270 | 265839 | ||||
| Delmar Gardens of Creve Coeur | NH AL IL | Creve Coeur | 148
Facility
148
MO AVG
112
Rank
#53 / 287 |
60.1%
Facility
60.1%
MO AVG
69.5%
Rank
#195 / 265 | -14% | 3.21
Facility
3.21
MO AVG
3.65
Rank
#191 / 275 | -79% | -12% | $0
Facility
$0
MO AVG
$89.7k
Rank
#1 / 278 | 29
Facility
29
MO AVG
36.1
Rank
#80 / 277 | 3.6
Facility
3.6
MO AVG
5.6
Rank
#27 / 277 | 2 | 89 | - |
26
Facility
26
MO AVG
50
Rank
#251 / 294 | Delmar Gardens Of Creve Coeur Operating, LLC | $10.3MFiscal year ending 03/2025
Facility
$10.3MFiscal year ending 03/2025
MO AVG
$8.1M
Rank
#63 / 270 | $5.9MFiscal year ending 03/2025
Facility
$5.9MFiscal year ending 03/2025
MO AVG
$4.2M
Rank
#44 / 270 | 57.5%Fiscal year ending 03/2025
Facility
57.5%Fiscal year ending 03/2025
MO AVG
55%
Rank
#96 / 270 | 265343 | ||||
| Sunterra Springs Dardenne Prairie | NH SNF | Dardenne Prairie | 38
Facility
38
MO AVG
112
Rank
#280 / 287 |
84.7%
Facility
84.7%
MO AVG
69.5%
Rank
#55 / 265 | +22% | 4.10
Facility
4.10
MO AVG
3.65
Rank
#81 / 275 | +98% | +12% | $49.7k
Facility
$49.7k
MO AVG
$89.7k
Rank
#229 / 278 | 31
Facility
31
MO AVG
36.1
Rank
#145 / 277 | 3.1
Facility
3.1
MO AVG
5.6
Rank
#27 / 277 | 3 | 32 | - |
19
Facility
19
MO AVG
50
Rank
#263 / 294 | Sunterra Dardenne Prairie Oc, LLC | $7.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MO AVG
$8.1M
Rank
#113 / 270 | $2.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$2.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MO AVG
$4.2M
Rank
#183 / 270 | 37.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
37.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MO AVG
55%
Rank
#261 / 270 | 265881 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other MO nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Missouri
Delmar Gardens of Creve Coeur is located in Creve Coeur, Missouri.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Missouri.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Delmar Gardens of Creve Coeur
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Who is the owner of Delmar Gardens of Creve Coeur?
Delmar Gardens of Creve Coeur is legally operated by Delmar Gardens Of Creve Coeur Operating, LLC.
02 Is Delmar Gardens of Creve Coeur in a walkable area?
Delmar Gardens of Creve Coeur has a walk score of 26. Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
03 What is the occupancy rate at Delmar Gardens of Creve Coeur?
Delmar Gardens of Creve Coeur's occupancy is 60.1%.
04 Are pets allowed at Delmar Gardens of Creve Coeur?
No, Delmar Gardens of Creve Coeur has a no-pet policy.
05 What is the best email address for Delmar Gardens of Creve Coeur?
The team at Delmar Gardens of Creve Coeur can be reached at info@delmargardens.com.
06 Does Delmar Gardens of Creve Coeur operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Delmar Gardens of Creve Coeur is registered as a for-profit in MO.
07 What is the overall rating for Delmar Gardens of Creve Coeur?
Delmar Gardens of Creve Coeur received a 1-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
Updated on
