4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Ginger Cove in Annapolis, Maryland, offers a environment for residents of all needs. This Life-Care community caters to individuals 60 and over, providing independent living, assisted living, memory care, and nursing care options. Ginger Cove prioritizes resident well-being with a heartfelt, resident-centered approach. Their dedicated staff crafts personalized care plans to ensure your loved one receives the exact level of support needed. Residents thrive in a cozy, relaxing, and fun-filled atmosphere, enjoying delicious and nutritious meals served daily, along with a vibrant calendar of social gatherings, educational activities, and specialized programs.
A life free from everyday chores. Ginger Cove takes care of housekeeping, laundry, and even transportation to appointments. With newfound free time, residents can explore their interests in a variety of ways. Continuing education programs encourage lifelong learning, while an on-site wellness center and resort-inspired amenities like an indoor pool and walking trails promote physical and mental well-being. Prefer for a quiet afternoon in the meditation garden, a friendly game of croquet with neighbors, or a kayaking expedition on Gingerville Creek, there’s something for everyone. For those seeking adventure beyond campus, Ginger Cove provides safe and secure living while you explore historic Annapolis, venture to Washington D.C., or international Travels.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
This nursing home is ranked 9th out of 120 nursing homes we track in Maryland for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 39mStandout metric: Registered nurse (RN) is +122% above Maryland average
1 of 6 metrics below Maryland average
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 16 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
16 staff · 8.4-hour shifts
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 13 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
13 staff · 9.6-hour shifts
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 36 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
36 staff · 7.3-hour shifts
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
93
74 employees · 19 contractors · 31 on an average day
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.2 h
↓ 10% · MD 8 hThis facility: 7.2 h, 10% below the Maryland average of 8 h (among Maryland facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
20,498 staff hours this quarter
See full Maryland ranking →89% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Maryland average: 87.8% · Contractors this quarter: Respiratory Therapy Technician (7), Speech Language Pathologist (5), Physical Therapy Aide (2), Qualified Social Worker (1), Physical Therapy Assistant (1), Diagnostic X-ray Services Staff (1), Medical Director (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
96
Rank #86 / 141Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 86th out of 141 nursing homes we track in Maryland for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Maryland facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Maryland that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #2 / 41Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 2nd out of 41 nursing homes we track in Maryland for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Maryland facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Maryland that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #69 / 160Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 69th out of 160 nursing homes we track in Maryland for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Maryland facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Maryland that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Aug 2026)
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
The below pricing was updated on
Sourced directly from the team at Ginger Cove.This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ. Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file — covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification surveys.
In Maryland, the Department of Health, Office of Health Care Quality is the state agency that conducts unannounced inspections and issues reports for all assisted living and nursing facilities.
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Maryland state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Citations
| This Facility | MD Average | vs. MD Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total citations
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 23 | 48.0 | This facility has 52% fewer total citations than a typical Maryland nursing home (23 vs. MD avg 48).↓ 52% better |
|
Citations per inspection
Average citations per inspection.
| 5.8 | 11.0 | This facility has 47% fewer citations per inspection than a typical Maryland nursing home (5.8 vs. MD avg 11).↓ 47% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | MD Average | vs. MD Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 4 | 5.0 | This facility has had 20% fewer total inspections than the Maryland average (4 vs. MD avg 5). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 20% fewer |
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
100% corrected
12 of 12 citations corrected Latest inspection: Nov 24, 2025 · 1 citation (Abuse/Neglect, moderate), corrected
Most cited category: Resident Assessment & Care Planning, 5 of 12 citations · 6 categories in total
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
8 of 12 citations resulted from standard inspections; 1 of 12 resulted from complaint investigations; and 3 of 12 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Resident demographic information for this facility.
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials were reported in the last 3 years.
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Maryland average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
1
/ 5
Significantly below average
↓ 73% · MD 3.7This facility: 1.0, 73% below the MD average of 3.7 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
1
/ 5
Significantly below average
↓ 73% · MD 3.7This facility: 1.0, 73% below the MD average of 3.7 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
14.5
Score · lower is better
↑ 32% · MD 11.0This facility: 14.5, 32% above the MD average of 11.0 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
24.6
Score · lower is better
↑ 10% · MD 22.4This facility: 24.6, 10% above the MD average of 22.4 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 2 better, 9 worse, 2 near MD average
8 short-stay measures: 2 better, 3 worse, 3 compared with US only
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
29.3%
↑ 44% · MD 20.4This facility: 29.3, 44% above the MD average of 20.4 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
16.9%
↓ 24% · MD 22.2This facility: 16.9, 24% below the MD average of 22.2 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
27.7%
↑ 11% · MD 25.0This facility: 27.7, 11% above the MD average of 25.0 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.7%
↑ 149% · MD 1.5This facility: 3.7, 149% above the MD average of 1.5 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
9.4%
↑ 287% · MD 2.4This facility: 9.4, 287% above the MD average of 2.4 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.4%
↑ 25% · MD 5.9This facility: 7.4, 25% above the MD average of 5.9 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.6%
↑ 77% · MD 5.4This facility: 9.6, 77% above the MD average of 5.4 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · MD 22.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the MD average of 22.8 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.8%
↑ 29% · MD 13.8This facility: 17.8, 29% above the MD average of 13.8 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
76.8%
↓ 17% · MD 92.6This facility: 76.8, 17% below the MD average of 92.6 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 3% · MD 96.6This facility: 100.0, 3% above the MD average of 96.6 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.23
↑ 69% · MD 1.32This facility: 2.23, 69% above the MD average of 1.32 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.22
↑ 1% · MD 1.21This facility: 1.22, 1% above the MD average of 1.21 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
36.7%
↓ 32% · US 53.7This facility: 36.7, 32% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
36.5%
↓ 28% · US 50.6This facility: 36.5, 28% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
4.8%
↑ 340% · MD 1.1This facility: 4.8, 340% above the MD average of 1.1 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
56.1%
↓ 29% · MD 79.1This facility: 56.1, 29% below the MD average of 79.1 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.9%
↑ 20% · MD 80.6This facility: 96.9, 20% above the MD average of 80.6 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
28.1%
↑ 33% · MD 21.2This facility: 28.1, 33% above the MD average of 21.2 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
8.3%
↓ 16% · MD 9.9This facility: 8.3, 16% below the MD average of 9.9 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
19% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
81% of new residents, often for short stays.
Historical financial and operational data for Ginger Cove from 2012–2025, based on CMS SNF Cost Reports. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Key figures below are for fiscal year ending in 06/2025.
Based on CMS SNF Cost Report for fiscal year ending in 06/2025.
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Money the home earns outside of resident care — such as investments, grants, rentals and other non-operating sources (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It is tracked separately from net patient revenue: it is not part of that figure, and it is not included in net patient income.
Staff salaries plus wage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement — from the home's own accounting records (CMS cost report, Worksheet A). Contract or agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs.
Rank #16 / 104Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 16th out of 104 nursing homes we track in Maryland. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Maryland average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Maryland that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll as a share of revenue: staff salaries and wage-related benefits divided by net patient revenue. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay.
Rank #3 / 104Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 3rd out of 104 nursing homes we track in Maryland. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Maryland average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Maryland that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Everything it costs to run the home apart from payroll — food, utilities, supplies, maintenance, contract labor and administration. Calculated as total operating expense minus payroll (staff salaries and wage-related benefits).
The home's total operating expense for the year — all the costs of running it, salaries included (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3).
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Most new residents arrive under private pay (81% of admissions), and a typical private pay stay runs around 4 - 5 months.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
Phyllis Johns Boulden is the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator and Chief Operating Officer at Ginger Cove. With over three decades of dedicated service, she brings extensive expertise in senior living operations. Phyllis holds a master’s degree in healthcare administration from the College of Notre Dame, underscoring her commitment to quality care and leadership within the community.
3.5 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Annapolis's city center to Ginger Cove's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Add your location
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the MD Dept. of Health (OHCQ), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HC (Home Care):
Professional care delivered in the person's own home, from companionship to skilled nursing.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
CCRC (Continuing Care Retirement Community):
A campus with multiple care levels so residents can age in place without moving.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Maryland average is: 50.3% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complete Care at Annapolis | NH HOS PC RC SNF | Annapolis | 97
Facility
97
MD AVG
108
Rank
#85 / 141 |
80.4%
Facility
80.4%
MD AVG
82.9%
Rank
#66 / 93 | -3% | 3.41
Facility
3.41
MD AVG
3.88
Rank
#64 / 120 | -3% | -12% | $0
Facility
$0
MD AVG
$53.4k
Rank
#1 / 122 | 30
Facility
30
MD AVG
52.0
Rank
#25 / 122 | 10.0
Facility
10.0
MD AVG
11.8
Rank
#53 / 122 | - | 78 | - |
62
Facility
62
MD AVG
45
Rank
#40 / 160 | Pc Md5 Opco Holdco LLC | $14.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024 | $5.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024 | 37.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024 | 215005 | ||||
| Autumn Lake Healthcare at Crofton | NH RC SNF | Crofton (Charing Cross) | 180
Facility
180
MD AVG
108
Rank
#16 / 141 |
86.6%
Facility
86.6%
MD AVG
82.9%
Rank
#55 / 93 | +4% | 3.35
Facility
3.35
MD AVG
3.88
Rank
#64 / 120 | +35% | -14% | $0
Facility
$0
MD AVG
$53.4k
Rank
#1 / 122 | 37
Facility
37
MD AVG
52.0
Rank
#41 / 122 | 12.3
Facility
12.3
MD AVG
11.8
Rank
#74 / 122 | - | 156 | - |
41
Facility
41
MD AVG
45
Rank
#88 / 160 | A&R Stern Family Cc Holdings LLC | $29.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$29.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MD AVG
$18.3M
Rank
#14 / 104 | $3.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$3.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MD AVG
$8.4M
Rank
#72 / 104 | 10.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
10.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MD AVG
50.3%
Rank
#84 / 104 | 215120 | ||||
| Ginger Cove | NH AL CCRC HC IL MC SNF | Annapolis | 96
Facility
96
MD AVG
108
Rank
#86 / 141 | - | - | 5.64
Facility
5.64
MD AVG
3.88
Rank
#9 / 120 | +25% | +46% | $0
Facility
$0
MD AVG
$53.4k
Rank
#1 / 122 | 12
Facility
12
MD AVG
52.0
Rank
#2 / 122 | 4.0
Facility
4.0
MD AVG
11.8
Rank
#3 / 122 | - | 41 | A+ |
51
Facility
51
MD AVG
45
Rank
#69 / 160 | Phyllis Boulden | $5.8MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$5.8MFiscal year ending 06/2025
MD AVG
$18.3M
Rank
#100 / 104 | $15.5MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$15.5MFiscal year ending 06/2025
MD AVG
$8.4M
Rank
#16 / 104 | 269.4%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
269.4%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
MD AVG
50.3%
Rank
#3 / 104 | 215174 | ||||
| Autumn Lake Healthcare at Spa Creek | NH RC SNF | Annapolis | 130
Facility
130
MD AVG
108
Rank
#47 / 141 |
89.2%
Facility
89.2%
MD AVG
82.9%
Rank
#45 / 93 | +8% | 3.18
Facility
3.18
MD AVG
3.88
Rank
#86 / 120 | -41% | -18% | $0
Facility
$0
MD AVG
$53.4k
Rank
#1 / 122 | 73
Facility
73
MD AVG
52.0
Rank
#98 / 122 | 18.3
Facility
18.3
MD AVG
11.8
Rank
#110 / 122 | 1 | 116 | - |
48
Facility
48
MD AVG
45
Rank
#74 / 160 | 35 Milkshake Holdco LLC | $22.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$22.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MD AVG
$18.3M
Rank
#30 / 104 | $1.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$1.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MD AVG
$8.4M
Rank
#87 / 104 | 6.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
6.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MD AVG
50.3%
Rank
#99 / 104 | 215258 | ||||
| Autumn Lake Healthcare at Baltimore Washington | NH SNF | Glen Burnie (South Gate) | 129
Facility
129
MD AVG
108
Rank
#51 / 141 |
80.4%
Facility
80.4%
MD AVG
82.9%
Rank
#66 / 93 | -3% | 3.22
Facility
3.22
MD AVG
3.88
Rank
#86 / 120 | +52% | -17% | $0
Facility
$0
MD AVG
$53.4k
Rank
#1 / 122 | 77
Facility
77
MD AVG
52.0
Rank
#104 / 122 | 15.4
Facility
15.4
MD AVG
11.8
Rank
#95 / 122 | - | 104 | - |
59
Facility
59
MD AVG
45
Rank
#49 / 160 | 313 Hospital Drive Opco LLC | $16.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$16.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MD AVG
$18.3M
Rank
#66 / 104 | $1.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$1.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MD AVG
$8.4M
Rank
#92 / 104 | 8.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
8.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MD AVG
50.3%
Rank
#86 / 104 | 215316 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other MD nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Ginger Cove is located in Annapolis, Maryland.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Maryland.
Ginger Cove has a walk score of 51. Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Ginger Cove's occupancy is 72.4%.
Ginger Cove has been operating for approximately 42 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
Yes — see the floorplan options available at Ginger Cove on this page.
No, Ginger Cove has a no-pet policy.
The team at Ginger Cove can be reached at sales@gingercove.com.
Ginger Cove received a 4-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
