Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
84
60 employees · 24 contractors · 32 on an average day Ingleside at Rock Creek, a CCRC
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Continuing Care Retirement Community, Home Care, Independent Living, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Washington, DC
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Ingleside at Rock Creek, a CCRC
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Continuing Care Retirement Community, Home Care, Independent Living, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Washington, DC
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Ingleside at Rock Creek, a CCRC accepts Medicare and private pay.
Ingleside at Rock Creek’s range in Washington, DC, takes in independent living, assisted living, memory care, home care, and skilled nursing as a continuing care retirement community. Independent living means a private residence with community services, while assisted living brings staff help to bathing, dressing, and medication.
Memory care gives those at risk of wandering a secured place under supervision, and skilled nursing puts licensed nurses at the center of care. Home care takes support to a resident’s own living space, and respite care is a brief stay that covers a family caregiver’s recovery period. Short-Term Rehab gives a resident a set window for rehabilitation. Care can change around a resident here without a change of community.
Thirty-four beds make for a small setting, and staff and residents get acquainted. Every day, each resident receives an average of 6 hours and 13 minutes in nursing care. Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay each have a place. Medicare is geared to skilled care after someone leaves the hospital, Medicaid can back a long stay, and families may also pay privately.
Residences have one, two, or three bedrooms, with a one-bedroom meant for one person. For exercise there is a swimming pool, a fitness center, and yoga, and walking paths are available. There is also a salon, and the Social Day Program gives structure to the day. Most errands mean arranging transportation, since the Walk Score is 42 and car-dependent.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
84
60 employees · 24 contractors · 32 on an average day
84 total staff / 27 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
3.11 : 1
↑ 118% · DC 1.43This facility: 3.11 staff per resident, 118% above the District of Columbia average of 1.43 (among District of Columbia facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
84 staff ÷ 27 residents
See full District Of Columbia ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.1 h
↓ 14% · DC 8.3 hThis facility: 7.1 h, 14% below the District of Columbia average of 8.3 h (among District of Columbia facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
20,585 staff hours this quarter
See full District Of Columbia ranking →77.6% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
District of Columbia average: 90.4% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (8), Respiratory Therapy Technician (3), Registered Nurse (3), Speech Language Pathologist (2), Physical Therapy Assistant (2), Qualified Social Worker (2), Occupational Therapy Aide (1), Medical Director (1), Diagnostic X-ray Services Staff (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
34
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
34Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Walk Score
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
42
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #4 / 10Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 4th out of 10 nursing homes we track in District of Columbia for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the District of Columbia average, with its Statewide rank out of 10. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in District of Columbia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #4 / 10Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 4th out of 10 nursing homes we track in District of Columbia for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the District of Columbia average, with its Statewide rank out of 10. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in District of Columbia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
89.1%
This home usually has limited availability
Based on residents per day and 34 beds.
Higher than the District of Columbia average: 78.4%
Residents per day (avg)
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
30
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
88
days
About This Community
Pricing & Financial Information
The below pricing was updated on
$4,128/Month
AccreditationsCARF Accredited, SAGECare Platinum certification, Great Place to Work, High Performer in LGBTQ+ Long-Term Care Equality, Fortune’s Best Workplaces in Aging Services
Profit StatusNonprofit
Resident Council
Family Council
Short-Term Rehab
Respite CareRespite care provides families and unpaid caregivers with short-term relief from caregiving duties. Care can range from a few hours to a few weeks.
HousekeepingListed as: Scheduled window cleaning and heavy housekeeping
MaintenanceListed as: Interior maintenance, repairs and improvements · Exterior maintenance including landscaping and snow removal
Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC)
Fitness Center
Meditation Room
Beauty Salon
Movie Theater
Library
Parking
Wi-Fi
Swimming Pool
14-Acre Wooded Campus
Activities
Continued Learning Programs
Guest Speakers and Performers
Receptions, Parties, and Dances
Movie Screenings
Art Exhibitions
Scheduled Trips To Events
Yoga Classes
Arts & Crafts
Dining & Nutrition
Sourced directly from the team at Ingleside at Rock Creek, a CCRC.
Dining & Nutrition
Sourced directly from the team at Ingleside at Rock Creek, a CCRC.- Bistro / café on site.
- Multiple dining venues.
1 Bedroom Floor plans as listed by the community: Willow (994 sq ft) · Hickory (1,016 sq ft) · Spruce (1,046 sq ft) · Beech (1,267 sq ft)
Floor plans: Willow, Hickory, Spruce, Beech
795–1,267 sq ft
2 Bedroom Floor plans as listed by the community: Cedar (1,295 sq ft) · Chestnut (1,300 sq ft) · Ash (1,405 sq ft) · Woodland (1,414 sq ft) · Sycamore (1,450 sq ft) · Dogwood (1,755 sq ft)
Floor plans: Cedar, Chestnut, Ash, Woodland, Sycamore +1 more
1,285–1,755 sq ft
3+ Bedroom
In-Room Features
Full-Sized Kitchens In Units
CMS Health Inspection History
Total health inspections
3
↓ 46% · DC 5.6This facility: 3, 46% below the DC average of 5.6 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
42
Rank #4 / 10Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 4th out of 10 nursing homes we track in District of Columbia for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the District of Columbia State average, with a ranking across all 10 DC facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in District of Columbia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 34% · DC 64.1This facility: 42, 34% below the DC average of 64.1 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
14
Rank #9 / 10Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 9th out of 10 nursing homes we track in District of Columbia for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the District of Columbia mean across 10 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in District of Columbia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 29% · DC 10.86This facility: 14, 29% above the DC average of 10.86 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
42 of 42 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
1
↓ 23% · DC 1.3This facility: 1, 23% below the DC average of 1.3 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · DC 1.9This facility: 0, 100% below the DC average of 1.9 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
41
↓ 32% · DC 60.3This facility: 41, 32% below the DC average of 60.3 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · DC 0.6This facility: 0, 100% below the DC average of 0.6 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Mar 26, 2025 · 15 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Resident Assessment & Care Planning, 10 of 42 citations · 10 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Mar 26, 2025
15 citations
Quality of Care critical citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Dec 08, 2023
16 citations
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Aug 25, 2022
11 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 42 citations
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
10 deficiencies (24%)
Resident Rights
8 deficiencies (19%)
Pharmacy Services
6 deficiencies (14%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
4 deficiencies (10%)
Quality of Life & Care
3 deficiencies (7%)
Nutrition & Dietary
3 deficiencies (7%)
Environmental
3 deficiencies (7%)
Administration
2 deficiencies (5%)
Nursing & Physician Services
2 deficiencies (5%)
Infection Control
1 deficiency (2%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
11 of 42 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 31 of 42 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
2 penalties in the past 3 years
Latest: Mar 26, 2025 · $14,082 civil money penalty
Mar 26, 2025 · $14,082 civil money penalty
Dec 8, 2023 · $25,337 civil money penalty
Total fines
$39,419
↓ 64% · DC $108KThis facility: $39,419, 64% below the District of Columbia average of $108,365. Average among the 11 District of Columbia facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #6 / 10Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 6th out of 10 nursing homes we track in District of Columbia for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the District of Columbia average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 10 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in District of Columbia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
2
↑ 5% · DC 1.91This facility: 2, 5% above the District of Columbia average of 1.91. Average among the 11 District of Columbia facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
DC avg 0.18District of Columbia average: 0.18. Average among the 11 District of Columbia facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Mar 26, 2025
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$14,082
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$14,082
Dec 8, 2023
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$25,337
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$25,337Fine amount comparison
This facility
$39,419
District of Columbia average
$108,365
US average
$66,281
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. District of Columbia and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the District of Columbia average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
9.5
Score · lower is better
≈ 0% · DC 9.5This facility: 9.5, level with the DC average of 9.5 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
29.1
Score · lower is better
↑ 60% · DC 18.2This facility: 29.1, 60% above the DC average of 18.2 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.10 long-stay measures: 4 better, 5 worse, 1 near DC average
3 short-stay measures: 1 better, 2 worse
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 10 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
25.0%
↑ 28% · DC 19.5This facility: 25.0, 28% above the DC average of 19.5 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
25.0%
↑ 28% · DC 19.5This facility: 25.0, 28% above the DC average of 19.5 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
33.3%
↑ 65% · DC 20.2This facility: 33.3, 65% above the DC average of 20.2 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
33.3%
↑ 65% · DC 20.2This facility: 33.3, 65% above the DC average of 20.2 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
↓ 100% · DC 1.5This facility: 0.0, 100% below the DC average of 1.5 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
↓ 100% · DC 1.5This facility: 0.0, 100% below the DC average of 1.5 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
↓ 100% · DC 1.4This facility: 0.0, 100% below the DC average of 1.4 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
↓ 100% · DC 1.4This facility: 0.0, 100% below the DC average of 1.4 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.1%
↓ 22% · DC 7.8This facility: 6.1, 22% below the DC average of 7.8 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.1%
↓ 22% · DC 7.8This facility: 6.1, 22% below the DC average of 7.8 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.0%
↑ 30% · DC 5.4This facility: 7.0, 30% above the DC average of 5.4 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.0%
↑ 30% · DC 5.4This facility: 7.0, 30% above the DC average of 5.4 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.6%
↓ 16% · DC 6.6This facility: 5.6, 16% below the DC average of 6.6 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.6%
↓ 16% · DC 6.6This facility: 5.6, 16% below the DC average of 6.6 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
10.4%
↑ 22% · DC 8.6This facility: 10.4, 22% above the DC average of 8.6 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
10.4%
↑ 22% · DC 8.6This facility: 10.4, 22% above the DC average of 8.6 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
85.2%
↓ 8% · DC 92.4This facility: 85.2, 8% below the DC average of 92.4 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
85.2%
↓ 8% · DC 92.4This facility: 85.2, 8% below the DC average of 92.4 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
90.9%
↓ 4% · DC 94.6This facility: 90.9, 4% below the DC average of 94.6 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
90.9%
↓ 4% · DC 94.6This facility: 90.9, 4% below the DC average of 94.6 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 3 measures
Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.8%
↓ 32% · DC 1.2This facility: 0.8, 32% below the DC average of 1.2 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.8%
↓ 32% · DC 1.2This facility: 0.8, 32% below the DC average of 1.2 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
59.0%
↓ 12% · DC 67.0This facility: 59.0, 12% below the DC average of 67.0 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
59.0%
↓ 12% · DC 67.0This facility: 59.0, 12% below the DC average of 67.0 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
50.6%
↓ 30% · DC 72.0This facility: 50.6, 30% below the DC average of 72.0 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
50.6%
↓ 30% · DC 72.0This facility: 50.6, 30% below the DC average of 72.0 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Ingleside at Rock Creek, a CCRC’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, and more than last year
−24.7% operating margin
−2.2 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 8 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($5.5M) trims the net loss to −$3.4M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most District of Columbia homes
36.6% payroll share of revenue
DC average 55.8%
Payroll rose $0.0M while revenue rose $1.5M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with District of Columbia homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | DC median | Compared with DC homesRank in DC | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $35.8M | +$1.5M | Trend 20172024 | DC median $28.6M | Rank in DC Not ranked | Not ranked No state rank for this year: homes are ranked only when their latest cost report is recent enough to compare. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $44.6M | +$2.6M | Trend 20172024 | DC median $26.0M | Rank in DC Not ranked | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$8.8M | −$1.1M | Trend 20172024 | DC median −$4.4M | Rank in DC Not ranked | Loss, widening Resident care lost money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −24.7% | −2.2 pts | Trend 20172024 | DC median −24.7% | Rank in DC Not ranked | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $5.5M | — | Trend — | DC median $0.7M | Rank in DC Not ranked | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$3.4M | −$1.5M | Trend — | DC median −$1.3M | Rank in DC Not ranked | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most District of Columbia homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | DC median | Compared with DC homesRank in DC | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $13.1M | +$0.0M | Trend 20172024 | DC median $13.1M | Rank in DC Not ranked | Not ranked No state rank for this year: homes are ranked only when their latest cost report is recent enough to compare. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 36.6% | −1.6 pts | Trend 20172024 | DC median 51.6% | Rank in DC Not ranked | 19.2 pts under DC average The DC average is 55.8% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · DC benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the District of Columbia payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin DC payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $19.0M | $13.9M | $14.1M | $21.9M | $28.3M | $32.6M | $34.3M | $35.8M |
| Operating expenses | $23.5M | $19.0M | $26.7M | $40.1M | $38.2M | $40.3M | $42.0M | $44.6M |
| Net patient income | −$4.6M | −$5.1M | −$12.6M | −$18.2M | −$9.9M | −$7.6M | −$7.7M | −$8.8M |
| Operating margin | −24.1% | −36.5% | −88.9% | −83.1% | −34.8% | −23.4% | −22.5% | −24.7% |
| Net income | −$3.7M | −$4.6M | −$10.6M | −$14.7M | −$6.7M | −$12.1M | −$1.9M | −$3.4M |
| Payroll costs | $8.8M | $7.0M | $8.2M | $10.6M | $10.6M | $12.7M | $13.1M | $13.1M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 46.2% | 50.2% | 57.8% | 48.3% | 37.6% | 38.8% | 38.2% | 36.6% |
| Beds | 228 | 228 | 242 | 319 | 319 | 319 | 320 | 320 |
| Gross revenue | $20.5M | $15.0M | $15.2M | $22.6M | $29.3M | $33.9M | $35.5M | $37.1M |
| Salaries | $7.2M | $5.8M | $6.6M | $8.6M | $9.1M | $10.4M | $11.3M | $11.2M |
| Wage-related costs | $1.6M | $1.1M | $1.6M | $2.0M | $1.6M | $2.3M | $1.8M | $1.9M |
| Contract labor | $0.9M | $0.4M | $0.4M | $0.5M | $0.6M | $0.3M | $0.7M | $0.7M |
| Other operating costs | $14.8M | $12.0M | $18.5M | $29.5M | $27.5M | $27.6M | $28.9M | $31.5M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $246 | $202 | $218 | $222 | $271 | $295 | $309 | $319 |
| Cost per day | $305 | $276 | $411 | $407 | $366 | $365 | $379 | $397 |
| Average length of stay | 74.0 days | 143.0 days | 297.0 days | 92.9 days | 70.0 days | 91.8 days | 80.3 days | 87.7 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
119 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
102 · 86%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
17 · 14%
Resident snapshot
27 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
4 · 15%
Medicaid
7 · 26%
Private pay & other
16 · 59%
Leaving
121 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
90 · 74%
Medicaid
1 · 1%
Private pay & other
30 · 25%
Mostly short-term rehab stays
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Over 15 years of experience
Jason Basile serves as Executive Director of Ingleside at Rock Creek, overseeing daily operations and strategic vision. With over 15 years in senior living not-for-profits, he has led major community enhancements including a full refurbishment and the launch of an adult day program. Jason holds a Masters in Health Care Administration and is a licensed nursing home administrator in South Carolina and Washington, D.C.
Living Spaces & Floor Plans for Ingleside at Rock Creek, a CCRC
Places of interest near Ingleside at Rock Creek, a CCRC
4.0 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Washington's city center to Ingleside at Rock Creek, a CCRC's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 3.07 miles to nearest hospital (Sibley Memorial Hospital)
Calculate Travel Distance to Ingleside at Rock Creek, a CCRC
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Washington, DC
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the DC Dept. of Health, senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
RESC (Residential Care):
Personal care and daily-living support in a smaller, more intimate residential setting.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HC (Home Care):
Professional care delivered in the person's own home, from companionship to skilled nursing.
CCRC (Continuing Care Retirement Community):
A campus with multiple care levels so residents can age in place without moving.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The District of Columbia average is: 55.8% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lisner-Louise-Dickson-Hurt-Home | NH AL RESC SNF | Washington (Northwest D.C) | 60 |
92.7%
Facility
92.7%
DC AVG
78.4%
Rank
#3 / 10 | +18% | 4.66 | +6% | -13% | $0
Facility
$0
DC AVG
$108.4k
Rank
#1 / 10 | 19
Facility
19
DC AVG
64.1
Rank
#1 / 10 | 4.8
Facility
4.8
DC AVG
10.9
Rank
#1 / 10 | - | 56 | - | 91 | Jonathan Plater | $10.2MFiscal year ending 06/2025 | $9.6MFiscal year ending 06/2025 | 94.2%Fiscal year ending 06/2025 | 095025 | ||||
| Forest Hills of DC | NH AL MC RC SNF | Washington (Northwest D.C) | 55 |
86.9%
Facility
86.9%
DC AVG
78.4%
Rank
#5 / 10 | +11% | 4.68 | +22% | -12% | $0
Facility
$0
DC AVG
$108.4k
Rank
#1 / 10 | 46
Facility
46
DC AVG
64.1
Rank
#5 / 10 | 9.2
Facility
9.2
DC AVG
10.9
Rank
#4 / 10 | 1 | 48 | - | 79 | Scott Taylor | $14.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024 | $7.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024 | 55.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024 | 095038 | ||||
| Sibley Memorial Hosp Renaissance | NH SNF | Washington (Northwest D.C) | 45 |
53.1%
Facility
53.1%
DC AVG
78.4%
Rank
#10 / 10 | -32% | 7.39 | +42% | +38% | $8.8k
Facility
$8.8k
DC AVG
$108.4k
Rank
#5 / 10 | 34
Facility
34
DC AVG
64.1
Rank
#2 / 10 | 6.8
Facility
6.8
DC AVG
10.9
Rank
#2 / 10 | 2 | 24 | - | 26 | - | - | - | - | 095030 | ||||
| Unique Rehabilitation & Health Center | NH SNF | Washington (Northwest D.C) | 230 |
97.1%
Facility
97.1%
DC AVG
78.4%
Rank
#2 / 10 | +24% | 4.47 | -2% | -17% | $48.9k
Facility
$48.9k
DC AVG
$108.4k
Rank
#7 / 10 | 72
Facility
72
DC AVG
64.1
Rank
#8 / 10 | 12.0
Facility
12.0
DC AVG
10.9
Rank
#8 / 10 | 4 | 223 | - | 92 | Regina Kim | $34.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024 | $17.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024 | 51.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024 | 095036 | ||||
| Ingleside at Rock Creek, a CCRC | NH AL CCRC HC IL MC SNF | Washington (Northwest D.C) | 34 |
89.1%
Facility
89.1%
DC AVG
78.4%
Rank
#4 / 10 | +14% | - | -19% | - | $39.4k
Facility
$39.4k
DC AVG
$108.4k
Rank
#6 / 10 | 42
Facility
42
DC AVG
64.1
Rank
#4 / 10 | 14.0
Facility
14.0
DC AVG
10.9
Rank
#9 / 10 | 1 | 30 | - | 42 | Bruce Bartels | $35.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024 | $13.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024 | 36.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024 | 095028 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other DC nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Ingleside at Rock Creek, a CCRC
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Is Ingleside at Rock Creek, a CCRC in a walkable area?
Ingleside at Rock Creek, a CCRC has a walk score of 42. Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
02 What is the occupancy rate at Ingleside at Rock Creek, a CCRC?
Ingleside at Rock Creek, a CCRC's occupancy is 89.1%.
03 Does Ingleside at Rock Creek, a CCRC have different floorplan options?
Yes — see the floorplan options available at Ingleside at Rock Creek, a CCRC on this page.
04 Are pets allowed at Ingleside at Rock Creek, a CCRC?
No, Ingleside at Rock Creek, a CCRC has a no-pet policy.
05 What is the best email address for Ingleside at Rock Creek, a CCRC?
The team at Ingleside at Rock Creek, a CCRC can be reached at inglesideinfo@inglesideonline.org.
06 Does Ingleside at Rock Creek, a CCRC operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Ingleside at Rock Creek, a CCRC is registered as a non-profit.
07 What is the overall rating for Ingleside at Rock Creek, a CCRC?
Ingleside at Rock Creek, a CCRC received a 3-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
Updated on
