Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
265
243 employees · 22 contractors · 128 on an average day Unique Rehabilitation & Health Center
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · Washington, DC
ALM Inspection Grade
D-
ALM's inspection grade is 61 / 100, a D- — 8 points below the District of Columbia average for CMS-certified facilities (69/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 61 / 100, a D- — 8 points below the District of Columbia average for CMS-certified facilities (69/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Unique Rehabilitation & Health Center
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · Washington, DC
ALM Inspection Grade
D-
ALM's inspection grade is 61 / 100, a D- — 8 points below the District of Columbia average for CMS-certified facilities (69/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 61 / 100, a D- — 8 points below the District of Columbia average for CMS-certified facilities (69/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Unique Rehabilitation & Health Center accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Unique Rehabilitation & Health Center, in Washington, DC, pairs skilled nursing with its nursing home. Nursing coverage holds through the night, since skilled nursing brings licensed nurses at all hours. Residents whose medical needs call for licensed nursing on an ongoing basis are the ones it serves.
It has 230 beds, and occupancy stands at 96.9%, so nearly every bed is in use on a given day. Each resident’s nursing averages 4 hours 28 minutes daily.
Medicare is meant for the skilled stretch right after a hospital stay. An eligible resident can get help from Medicaid with a longer stay, and private pay means the resident or family covers the bill.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 28m
Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 28mStandout metric: Certified nursing assistant is +9% above District of Columbia average
5 of 6 metrics below District of Columbia average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 32 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
32 staff · 8.5-hour shifts
1h 7m
↓ 36% · DC 1h 45mThis facility: 1h 7m per resident per day, 36% below the District of Columbia average of 1h 45m (among District of Columbia facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 32 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
32 staff · 8.5-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 18 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
18 staff · 8.2-hour shifts
33m
↓ 3% · DC 34mThis facility: 33m per resident per day, 3% below the District of Columbia average of 34m (among District of Columbia facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 18 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
18 staff · 8.2-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 130 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
130 staff · 8.2-hour shifts
2h 47m
↑ 9% · DC 2h 33mThis facility: 2h 47m per resident per day, 9% above the District of Columbia average of 2h 33m (among District of Columbia facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 130 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
130 staff · 8.2-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 21m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation. All 18 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
18 staff · 7.2-hour shifts
2m
↓ 72% · DC 6mThis facility: 2m per resident per day, 72% below the District of Columbia average of 6m (among District of Columbia facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation. All 18 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
18 staff · 7.2-hour shiftsUS average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
4h 3m
↓ 7% · DC 4h 21mThis facility: 4h 3m per resident per day, 7% below the District of Columbia average of 4h 21m (among District of Columbia facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
42m
↓ 49% · DC 1h 23mThis facility: 42m per resident per day, 49% below the District of Columbia average of 1h 23m (among District of Columbia facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
265
243 employees · 22 contractors · 128 on an average day
265 total staff / 213 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.24 : 1
↓ 12% · DC 1.41This facility: 1.24 staff per resident, 12% below the District of Columbia average of 1.41 (among District of Columbia facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
265 staff ÷ 213 residents
See full District Of Columbia ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8.1 h
↓ 2% · DC 8.3 hThis facility: 8.1 h, 2% below the District of Columbia average of 8.3 h (among District of Columbia facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
94,873 staff hours this quarter
See full District Of Columbia ranking →95.3% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
District of Columbia average: 90.3% · Contractors this quarter: Speech Language Pathologist (6), Physical Therapy Assistant (5), Qualified Social Worker (4), Respiratory Therapy Technician (4), Physical Therapy Aide (2), Qualified Activities Professional (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A large-scale community that may provide a wide range of amenities, services, and structured programs.
230
A large-scale community that may provide a wide range of amenities, services, and structured programs.
230High-capacity home · May provide extensive amenities, services and programs.
Walk Score
Walker's paradise. Daily errands do not require a car, with many shops and services nearby.
Walker's paradise. Daily errands do not require a car, with many shops and services nearby.
92
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy higher than 95% suggests steady demand, but availability may be limited.
Rank #2 / 10Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 2nd out of 10 nursing homes we track in District of Columbia for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the District of Columbia average, with its Statewide rank out of 10. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in District of Columbia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy higher than 95% suggests steady demand, but availability may be limited.
Rank #2 / 10Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 2nd out of 10 nursing homes we track in District of Columbia for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the District of Columbia average, with its Statewide rank out of 10. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in District of Columbia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
97.1%
This home is often near full
Based on residents per day and 230 beds.
Higher than the District of Columbia average: 79.6%
Residents per day (avg)
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
223
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
160
days
About This Community
Resident Council
Short-Term Rehabilitation
Adaptive Equipment Training
Occupational Therapy
Physical Therapy
Speech Therapy
Wound Care ManagementClinical care for preventing, assessing, and treating wounds, including pressure injuries and surgical wounds. It can support healing and reduce complications.
Fall Prevention Education
Pain Management
Infectious Disease Care
Congestive Heart Failure Care
Pulmonary Care and Trach Treatment
Diabetes Management
Specialized Services for Complex Medical Conditions
HousekeepingListed as: Daily housekeeping
Laundry & Linen
Beauty Salon
Wi-Fi
Cable Tv
Homelike Dining Rooms
Activities
Music Programs
Movie Nights
Holiday Celebrations
Clubs and Group Gatherings
Room Types
Private Room
Semi-Private / Shared Room
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
61 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
8 points below the District of Columbia average for CMS-certified facilities (69/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Concern
216 severity-weighted points (72 citations) · 4× higher than the typical CMS-certified DC facility (median: 50)
Enforcement
Concern
$48,887 in fines · 1 enforcement action
Persistence
Concern
66 days to fix issues · much slower than the typical CMS-certified DC facility (median: 31)
Total health inspections
6
↑ 5% · DC 5.7This facility: 6, 5% above the DC average of 5.7 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
72
Rank #8 / 10Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 8th out of 10 nursing homes we track in District of Columbia for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the District of Columbia State average, with a ranking across all 10 DC facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in District of Columbia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 13% · DC 63.5This facility: 72, 13% above the DC average of 63.5 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
12
Rank #8 / 10Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 8th out of 10 nursing homes we track in District of Columbia for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the District of Columbia mean across 10 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in District of Columbia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 14% · DC 10.5This facility: 12, 14% above the DC average of 10.5 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
72 of 72 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
1
↓ 29% · DC 1.4This facility: 1, 29% below the DC average of 1.4 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
3
↑ 67% · DC 1.8This facility: 3, 67% above the DC average of 1.8 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
68
↑ 14% · DC 59.6This facility: 68, 14% above the DC average of 59.6 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · DC 0.6This facility: 0, 100% below the DC average of 0.6 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Nov 24, 2025 · 2 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Resident Assessment & Care Planning, 16 of 72 citations · 10 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Nov 24, 2025
2 citations
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Sep 19, 2025
1 citation
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jun 06, 2025
1 citation
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 27, 2024
21 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care critical citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Sep 26, 2022
25 citations
Abuse/Neglect serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Showing the 50 most recent of 72 citations.
Top deficiency categories
Share of 72 citations
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
16 deficiencies (22%)
Resident Rights
13 deficiencies (18%)
Quality of Life & Care
12 deficiencies (17%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
10 deficiencies (14%)
Pharmacy Services
5 deficiencies (7%)
Environmental
5 deficiencies (7%)
Nutrition & Dietary
4 deficiencies (6%)
Infection Control
3 deficiencies (4%)
Administration
2 deficiencies (3%)
Nursing & Physician Services
2 deficiencies (3%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
60 of 72 citations resulted from standard inspections; 10 of 72 resulted from complaint investigations; and 2 of 72 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
1 penalty in the past 3 years
Latest: Nov 27, 2024 · $48,887 civil money penalty
Nov 27, 2024 · $48,887 civil money penalty
Total fines
$48,887
↓ 63% · DC $132KThis facility: $48,887, 63% below the District of Columbia average of $132,272. Average among the 11 District of Columbia facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #7 / 10Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 7th out of 10 nursing homes we track in District of Columbia for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the District of Columbia average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 10 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in District of Columbia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
1
↓ 54% · DC 2.18This facility: 1, 54% below the District of Columbia average of 2.18. Average among the 11 District of Columbia facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
DC avg 0.36District of Columbia average: 0.36. Average among the 11 District of Columbia facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Nov 27, 2024
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$48,887
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$48,887Fine amount comparison
This facility
$48,887
District of Columbia average
$132,272
US average
$67,417
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. District of Columbia and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the District of Columbia average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
3
/ 5
Average
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
6.0
Score · lower is better
↓ 39% · DC 9.7This facility: 6.0, 39% below the DC average of 9.7 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
13.8
Score · lower is better
↓ 28% · DC 19.2This facility: 13.8, 28% below the DC average of 19.2 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 7 better, 3 worse, 3 near DC average
8 short-stay measures: 2 better, 2 worse, 1 near DC average, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
11.0%
↓ 46% · DC 20.2This facility: 11.0, 46% below the DC average of 20.2 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
11.0%
↓ 46% · DC 20.2This facility: 11.0, 46% below the DC average of 20.2 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
8.0%
↓ 52% · DC 16.8This facility: 8.0, 52% below the DC average of 16.8 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
8.0%
↓ 52% · DC 16.8This facility: 8.0, 52% below the DC average of 16.8 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
22.3%
↑ 4% · DC 21.4This facility: 22.3, 4% above the DC average of 21.4 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
22.3%
↑ 4% · DC 21.4This facility: 22.3, 4% above the DC average of 21.4 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.0%
↓ 29% · DC 1.4This facility: 1.0, 29% below the DC average of 1.4 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.0%
↓ 29% · DC 1.4This facility: 1.0, 29% below the DC average of 1.4 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.2%
↑ 9% · DC 1.1This facility: 1.2, 9% above the DC average of 1.1 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.2%
↑ 9% · DC 1.1This facility: 1.2, 9% above the DC average of 1.1 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.0%
↓ 8% · DC 7.6This facility: 7.0, 8% below the DC average of 7.6 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.0%
↓ 8% · DC 7.6This facility: 7.0, 8% below the DC average of 7.6 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.6%
↓ 52% · DC 5.3This facility: 2.6, 52% below the DC average of 5.3 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.6%
↓ 52% · DC 5.3This facility: 2.6, 52% below the DC average of 5.3 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
22.4%
↑ 251% · DC 6.4This facility: 22.4, 251% above the DC average of 6.4 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
22.4%
↑ 251% · DC 6.4This facility: 22.4, 251% above the DC average of 6.4 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
8.2%
↑ 2% · DC 8.0This facility: 8.2, 2% above the DC average of 8.0 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
8.2%
↑ 2% · DC 8.0This facility: 8.2, 2% above the DC average of 8.0 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.9%
↑ 8% · DC 91.7This facility: 98.9, 8% above the DC average of 91.7 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.9%
↑ 8% · DC 91.7This facility: 98.9, 8% above the DC average of 91.7 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
99.5%
↑ 3% · DC 97.0This facility: 99.5, 3% above the DC average of 97.0 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
99.5%
↑ 3% · DC 97.0This facility: 99.5, 3% above the DC average of 97.0 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.97
↓ 9% · DC 1.07This facility: 0.97, 9% below the DC average of 1.07 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.97
↓ 9% · DC 1.07This facility: 0.97, 9% below the DC average of 1.07 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.69
↑ 5% · DC 0.66This facility: 0.69, 5% above the DC average of 0.66 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.69
↑ 5% · DC 0.66This facility: 0.69, 5% above the DC average of 0.66 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
56.8%
↑ 6% · US 53.7This facility: 56.8, 6% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
56.8%
↑ 6% · US 53.7This facility: 56.8, 6% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
36.2%
↓ 28% · US 50.6This facility: 36.2, 28% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
36.2%
↓ 28% · US 50.6This facility: 36.2, 28% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.5%
↑ 87% · DC 0.8This facility: 1.5, 87% above the DC average of 0.8 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.5%
↑ 87% · DC 0.8This facility: 1.5, 87% above the DC average of 0.8 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
73.6%
↑ 11% · DC 66.5This facility: 73.6, 11% above the DC average of 66.5 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
73.6%
↑ 11% · DC 66.5This facility: 73.6, 11% above the DC average of 66.5 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
88.1%
↑ 20% · DC 73.2This facility: 88.1, 20% above the DC average of 73.2 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
88.1%
↑ 20% · DC 73.2This facility: 88.1, 20% above the DC average of 73.2 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
21.7%
↑ 20% · DC 18.1This facility: 21.7, 20% above the DC average of 18.1 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
21.7%
↑ 20% · DC 18.1This facility: 21.7, 20% above the DC average of 18.1 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
7.1%
↓ 1% · DC 7.2This facility: 7.1, 1% below the DC average of 7.2 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
7.1%
↓ 1% · DC 7.2This facility: 7.1, 1% below the DC average of 7.2 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Unique Rehabilitation & Health Center’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Profitable on care
13.7% operating margin
+3.9 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 6 of the last 8 reported years. Net income $5.5M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most District of Columbia homes
51.5% payroll share of revenue
DC average 55.8%
Payroll rose $0.2M while revenue rose $2.7M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with District of Columbia homes.
Revenue & profit
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2016 → 2024Trend | DC median | Compared with DC homesRank in DC | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $34.7M | +$2.7M | Trend 20162024 | DC median $28.6M | Rank in DC Not ranked | Not ranked No state rank for this year: homes are ranked only when their latest cost report is recent enough to compare. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $30.0M | +$1.1M | Trend 20162024 | DC median — | Rank in DC Not ranked | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $4.8M | +$1.6M | Trend 20162024 | DC median — | Rank in DC Not ranked | Profit, growing Resident care made money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 13.7% | +3.9 pts | Trend 20162024 | DC median — | Rank in DC Not ranked | Healthy margin More than 5% of revenue is left after operating expenses. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.7M | — | Trend — | DC median — | Rank in DC Not ranked | Adds to profit Income from outside resident care, on top of the profit from care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $5.5M | +$2.0M | Trend — | DC median — | Rank in DC Not ranked | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most District of Columbia homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2016 → 2024Trend | DC median | Compared with DC homesRank in DC | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $17.9M | +$0.2M | Trend 20162024 | DC median $13.1M | Rank in DC Not ranked | Not ranked No state rank for this year: homes are ranked only when their latest cost report is recent enough to compare. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 51.5% | −3.8 pts | Trend 20162024 | DC median 51.6% | Rank in DC Not ranked | 4.3 pts under DC average The DC average is 55.8% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2016–2024 2 charts · DC benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income No report
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the District of Columbia payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin DC payroll average No report
Year-by-year data, 2016–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2016 | 2017 | 2018no report | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $25.1M | $23.2M | $27.0M | $25.8M | $33.7M | $35.7M | $32.1M | $34.7M | |
| Operating expenses | $23.9M | $24.0M | $24.1M | $26.7M | $28.1M | $29.6M | $28.9M | $30.0M | |
| Net patient income | $1.2M | −$0.8M | $2.9M | −$0.8M | $5.6M | $6.1M | $3.2M | $4.8M | |
| Operating margin | 4.9% | −3.5% | 10.7% | −3.2% | 16.5% | 17.0% | 9.9% | 13.7% | |
| Net income | $4.5M | −$0.7M | $3.6M | $5.6M | $8.0M | $6.1M | $3.5M | $5.5M | |
| Payroll costs | $12.8M | $12.9M | $13.9M | $15.6M | $14.9M | $16.7M | $17.7M | $17.9M | |
| Payroll share of revenue | 50.9% | 55.6% | 51.4% | 60.4% | 44.4% | 46.7% | 55.3% | 51.5% | |
| Beds | 230 | 230 | 230 | 230 | 230 | 230 | 230 | 230 | |
| Gross revenue | $25.1M | $26.0M | $27.0M | $25.8M | $26.6M | $50.6M | $48.2M | $36.3M | |
| Salaries | $10.8M | $11.0M | $12.1M | $13.6M | $12.9M | $14.5M | $15.5M | $15.7M | |
| Wage-related costs | $1.9M | $1.9M | $1.8M | $2.0M | $2.0M | $2.1M | $2.3M | $2.2M | |
| Contract labor | $0.3M | $0.3M | — | — | $1.1M | $1.1M | $1.2M | $1.3M | |
| Other operating costs | $11.1M | $11.1M | $10.2M | $11.1M | $13.2M | $12.9M | $11.2M | $12.1M | |
| Net patient revenue per day | $312 | $296 | $332 | $338 | $463 | $464 | $425 | $434 | |
| Cost per day | $297 | $306 | $297 | $349 | $386 | $385 | $383 | $374 | |
| Average length of stay | 479.4 days | 449.9 days | 210.0 days | 259.5 days | 246.7 days | 234.2 days | 207.4 days | 160.2 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 6 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Jun 2026
Arriving
494 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
197 · 40%
Medicaid
154 · 31%
Private pay & other
143 · 29%
Resident snapshot
213 residents · Jun 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
24 · 11%
Medicaid
181 · 85%
Private pay & other
8 · 4%
Leaving
500 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
136 · 27%
Medicaid
242 · 48%
Private pay & other
122 · 24%
Mostly short-term rehab stays
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Places of interest near Unique Rehabilitation & Health Center
1.3 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Washington's city center to Unique Rehabilitation & Health Center's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Unique Rehabilitation & Health Center
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Washington, DC
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the DC Dept. of Health, senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
RESC (Residential Care):
Personal care and daily-living support in a smaller, more intimate residential setting.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
CCRC (Continuing Care Retirement Community):
A campus with multiple care levels so residents can age in place without moving.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The District of Columbia average is: 55.8% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lisner-Louise-Dickson-Hurt-Home | NH AL RESC SNF | Washington (Northwest D.C) | 60 | A- |
92.7%
Facility
92.7%
DC AVG
79.6%
Rank
#3 / 10 | +16% | 4.66 | -6% | -21% | $0
Facility
$0
DC AVG
$132.3k
Rank
#1 / 10 | 19
Facility
19
DC AVG
63.5
Rank
#1 / 10 | 4.8
Facility
4.8
DC AVG
10.5
Rank
#1 / 10 | - | 56 | - | 91 | Jonathan Plater | $10.2MFiscal year ending 06/2025 | $9.6MFiscal year ending 06/2025 | 94.2%Fiscal year ending 06/2025 | 095025 | ||||
| Forest Hills of DC | NH AL MC RC SNF | Washington (Northwest D.C) | 55 | C+ |
86.9%
Facility
86.9%
DC AVG
79.6%
Rank
#4 / 10 | +9% | 4.68 | +10% | -21% | $0
Facility
$0
DC AVG
$132.3k
Rank
#1 / 10 | 46
Facility
46
DC AVG
63.5
Rank
#5 / 10 | 9.2
Facility
9.2
DC AVG
10.5
Rank
#4 / 10 | 1 | 48 | - | 79 | Scott Taylor | $14.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024 | $7.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024 | 55.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024 | 095038 | ||||
| Sibley Memorial Hosp Renaissance | NH SNF | Washington (Northwest D.C) | 45 | ? |
53.1%
Facility
53.1%
DC AVG
79.6%
Rank
#7 / 10 | -33% | 7.39 | +70% | +25% | $8.8k
Facility
$8.8k
DC AVG
$132.3k
Rank
#5 / 10 | 34
Facility
34
DC AVG
63.5
Rank
#2 / 10 | 6.8
Facility
6.8
DC AVG
10.5
Rank
#2 / 10 | 2 | 24 | - | 26 | - | - | - | - | 095030 | ||||
| Unique Rehabilitation & Health Center | NH SNF | Washington (Northwest D.C) | 230 | D- |
97.1%
Facility
97.1%
DC AVG
79.6%
Rank
#2 / 10 | +22% | 4.47 | -40% | -24% | $48.9k
Facility
$48.9k
DC AVG
$132.3k
Rank
#7 / 10 | 72
Facility
72
DC AVG
63.5
Rank
#8 / 10 | 12.0
Facility
12.0
DC AVG
10.5
Rank
#8 / 10 | 4 | 223 | - | 92 | Regina Kim | $34.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024 | $17.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024 | 51.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024 | 095036 | ||||
| Knollwood Life Plan Community | NH AL CCRC IL MC SNF | Washington (Northwest D.C) | 69 | ? |
55.2%
Facility
55.2%
DC AVG
79.6%
Rank
#10 / 10 | -31% | 8.63 | -4% | +46% | $0
Facility
$0
DC AVG
$132.3k
Rank
#1 / 10 | 39
Facility
39
DC AVG
63.5
Rank
#3 / 10 | 7.8
Facility
7.8
DC AVG
10.5
Rank
#3 / 10 | 3 | 38 | - | 15 | Sonja Brooks | $19.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024 | $11.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024 | 55.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024 | 095026 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other DC nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Unique Rehabilitation & Health Center
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Is Unique Rehabilitation & Health Center in a walkable area?
Unique Rehabilitation & Health Center has a walk score of 92. Walker's paradise. Daily errands do not require a car, with many shops and services nearby.
02 What is the occupancy rate at Unique Rehabilitation & Health Center?
Unique Rehabilitation & Health Center's occupancy is 97.1%.
03 Are pets allowed at Unique Rehabilitation & Health Center?
No, Unique Rehabilitation & Health Center has a no-pet policy.
04 What is the best email address for Unique Rehabilitation & Health Center?
The team at Unique Rehabilitation & Health Center can be reached at contact@uniquerhc.com.
05 Does Unique Rehabilitation & Health Center operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Unique Rehabilitation & Health Center is registered as a for-profit.
06 What is the overall rating for Unique Rehabilitation & Health Center?
Unique Rehabilitation & Health Center received a 4-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
07 How many beds does Unique Rehabilitation & Health Center have?
Unique Rehabilitation & Health Center has 230 beds.
Updated on
