Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
79
75 employees · 4 contractors · 37 on an average day Lisner-Louise-Dickson-Hurt-Home
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Residential Care & Skilled Nursing · Washington, DC
ALM Inspection Grade
A-
ALM's inspection grade is 91 / 100, an A- — 22 points above the District of Columbia average for CMS-certified facilities (69/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 91 / 100, an A- — 22 points above the District of Columbia average for CMS-certified facilities (69/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Lisner-Louise-Dickson-Hurt-Home
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Residential Care & Skilled Nursing · Washington, DC
ALM Inspection Grade
A-
ALM's inspection grade is 91 / 100, an A- — 22 points above the District of Columbia average for CMS-certified facilities (69/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 91 / 100, an A- — 22 points above the District of Columbia average for CMS-certified facilities (69/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Lisner-Louise-Dickson-Hurt-Home accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Overview of Lisner-Louise-Dickson-Hurt-Home
Lisner-Louise-Dickson-Hurt-Home offers nursing home, assisted living, residential care, and skilled nursing in Washington, DC. Assisted living and residential care include help with daily needs, while skilled nursing provides licensed nursing care on site around the clock. The range of services can suit a resident whose needs change over time without requiring a move to another community.
The home has 60 beds. Total nurse staffing is 4 hours and 39 minutes per resident per day, representing the daily hands-on nursing time allocated to each resident. Short-term rehabilitation is also available through the rehabilitation program, giving someone recovering from an illness, injury, or hospital stay a temporary setting for care and therapy.
Lisner-Louise-Dickson-Hurt-Home accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay, giving families several ways to cover care based on the resident’s payment situation. Located in Northwest Washington, the home has a Walk Score of 91, meaning daily errands do not require a car and a resident who no longer drives can still reach nearby destinations independently.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 39m
Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 39mStandout metric: LPN / LVN is +31% above District of Columbia average
4 of 6 metrics below District of Columbia average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 15 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
15 staff · 8.6-hour shifts
1h 14m
↓ 30% · DC 1h 45mThis facility: 1h 14m per resident per day, 30% below the District of Columbia average of 1h 45m (among District of Columbia facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 15 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
15 staff · 8.6-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 12 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
12 staff · 9.1-hour shifts
44m
↑ 31% · DC 34mThis facility: 44m per resident per day, 31% above the District of Columbia average of 34m (among District of Columbia facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 12 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
12 staff · 9.1-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 28 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
28 staff · 9.7-hour shifts
2h 42m
↑ 6% · DC 2h 33mThis facility: 2h 42m per resident per day, 6% above the District of Columbia average of 2h 33m (among District of Columbia facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 28 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
28 staff · 9.7-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 20m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 20m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
6m
↓ 3% · DC 6mThis facility: 6m per resident per day, 3% below the District of Columbia average of 6m (among District of Columbia facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
4h 12m
↓ 4% · DC 4h 21mThis facility: 4h 12m per resident per day, 4% below the District of Columbia average of 4h 21m (among District of Columbia facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
1h 2m
↓ 26% · DC 1h 23mThis facility: 1h 2m per resident per day, 26% below the District of Columbia average of 1h 23m (among District of Columbia facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 28m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 28m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
79
75 employees · 4 contractors · 37 on an average day
79 total staff / 58 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.36 : 1
↓ 3% · DC 1.41This facility: 1.36 staff per resident, 3% below the District of Columbia average of 1.41 (among District of Columbia facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
79 staff ÷ 58 residents
See full District Of Columbia ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8.9 h
↑ 7% · DC 8.3 hThis facility: 8.9 h, 7% above the District of Columbia average of 8.3 h (among District of Columbia facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
30,231 staff hours this quarter
See full District Of Columbia ranking →98.8% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
District of Columbia average: 90.3% · Contractors this quarter: Occupational Therapy Aide (1), Occupational Therapist (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1), Medical Director (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
60
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
60Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Walk Score
Walker's paradise. Daily errands do not require a car, with many shops and services nearby.
Walker's paradise. Daily errands do not require a car, with many shops and services nearby.
91
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #3 / 10Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 3rd out of 10 nursing homes we track in District of Columbia for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the District of Columbia average, with its Statewide rank out of 10. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in District of Columbia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #3 / 10Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 3rd out of 10 nursing homes we track in District of Columbia for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the District of Columbia average, with its Statewide rank out of 10. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in District of Columbia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
92.7%
This home usually has limited availability
Based on residents per day and 60 beds.
Higher than the District of Columbia average: 79.6%
Residents per day (avg)
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
56
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
455
days
About This Community
Resident Council
Family Council
Short-Term Rehab
Volunteer Program
Pets not allowed
Volunteer Program
Touring HoursDaily: 8:30 AM - 8:30 PM
Building Type3-story
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
91 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
22 points above the District of Columbia average for CMS-certified facilities (69/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Typical
27 severity-weighted points (19 citations) · 2× lower than the typical CMS-certified DC facility (median: 50)
Enforcement
Strong
No fines on record · 0 enforcement actions
Persistence
Typical
38 days to fix issues · slower than the typical CMS-certified DC facility (median: 31)
Total health inspections
4
↓ 30% · DC 5.7This facility: 4, 30% below the DC average of 5.7 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
19
Rank #1 / 10Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 1st out of 10 nursing homes we track in District of Columbia for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the District of Columbia State average, with a ranking across all 10 DC facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in District of Columbia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 70% · DC 63.5This facility: 19, 70% below the DC average of 63.5 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
4.75
Rank #1 / 10Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 1st out of 10 nursing homes we track in District of Columbia for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the District of Columbia mean across 10 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in District of Columbia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 55% · DC 10.5This facility: 4.75, 55% below the DC average of 10.5 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
19 of 19 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · DC 1.4This facility: 0, 100% below the DC average of 1.4 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · DC 1.8This facility: 0, 100% below the DC average of 1.8 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
19
↓ 68% · DC 59.6This facility: 19, 68% below the DC average of 59.6 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · DC 0.6This facility: 0, 100% below the DC average of 0.6 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Nov 13, 2025 · 2 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Resident Assessment & Care Planning, 4 of 19 citations · 8 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Nov 13, 2025
2 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jun 25, 2025
2 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 12, 2023
9 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 12, 2021
6 citations
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 19 citations
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
4 deficiencies (21%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
4 deficiencies (21%)
Nutrition & Dietary
3 deficiencies (16%)
Pharmacy Services
3 deficiencies (16%)
Environmental
2 deficiencies (11%)
Infection Control
1 deficiency (5%)
Quality of Life & Care
1 deficiency (5%)
Nursing & Physician Services
1 deficiency (5%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
15 of 19 citations resulted from standard inspections; 2 of 19 resulted from complaint investigations; and 2 of 19 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Aug 2023.
Total fines
$0
DC avg $132KDistrict of Columbia average: $132,272. Average among the 11 District of Columbia facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
DC avg 2.18District of Columbia average: 2.18. Average among the 11 District of Columbia facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
DC avg 0.36District of Columbia average: 0.36. Average among the 11 District of Columbia facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the District of Columbia average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
5.7
Score · lower is better
↓ 42% · DC 9.7This facility: 5.7, 42% below the DC average of 9.7 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
12.4
Score · lower is better
↓ 35% · DC 19.2This facility: 12.4, 35% below the DC average of 19.2 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 9 better, 2 worse, 2 near DC average
8 short-stay measures: 5 better, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
11.5%
↓ 43% · DC 20.2This facility: 11.5, 43% below the DC average of 20.2 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
11.5%
↓ 43% · DC 20.2This facility: 11.5, 43% below the DC average of 20.2 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
7.7%
↓ 54% · DC 16.8This facility: 7.7, 54% below the DC average of 16.8 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
7.7%
↓ 54% · DC 16.8This facility: 7.7, 54% below the DC average of 16.8 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
18.0%
↓ 16% · DC 21.4This facility: 18.0, 16% below the DC average of 21.4 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
18.0%
↓ 16% · DC 21.4This facility: 18.0, 16% below the DC average of 21.4 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.2%
↑ 265% · DC 1.4This facility: 5.2, 265% above the DC average of 1.4 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.2%
↑ 265% · DC 1.4This facility: 5.2, 265% above the DC average of 1.4 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.9%
↑ 64% · DC 1.1This facility: 1.9, 64% above the DC average of 1.1 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.9%
↑ 64% · DC 1.1This facility: 1.9, 64% above the DC average of 1.1 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.0%
↓ 47% · DC 7.6This facility: 4.0, 47% below the DC average of 7.6 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.0%
↓ 47% · DC 7.6This facility: 4.0, 47% below the DC average of 7.6 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.2%
↓ 39% · DC 5.3This facility: 3.2, 39% below the DC average of 5.3 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.2%
↓ 39% · DC 5.3This facility: 3.2, 39% below the DC average of 5.3 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · DC 6.4This facility: 0.0, 100% below the DC average of 6.4 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · DC 6.4This facility: 0.0, 100% below the DC average of 6.4 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
7.9%
↓ 2% · DC 8.0This facility: 7.9, 2% below the DC average of 8.0 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
7.9%
↓ 2% · DC 8.0This facility: 7.9, 2% below the DC average of 8.0 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 9% · DC 91.7This facility: 100.0, 9% above the DC average of 91.7 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 9% · DC 91.7This facility: 100.0, 9% above the DC average of 91.7 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 3% · DC 97.0This facility: 100.0, 3% above the DC average of 97.0 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 3% · DC 97.0This facility: 100.0, 3% above the DC average of 97.0 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.52
↓ 51% · DC 1.07This facility: 0.52, 51% below the DC average of 1.07 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.52
↓ 51% · DC 1.07This facility: 0.52, 51% below the DC average of 1.07 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.17
↓ 74% · DC 0.66This facility: 0.17, 74% below the DC average of 0.66 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.17
↓ 74% · DC 0.66This facility: 0.17, 74% below the DC average of 0.66 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
42.6%
↓ 21% · US 53.7This facility: 42.6, 21% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
42.6%
↓ 21% · US 53.7This facility: 42.6, 21% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
48.0%
↓ 5% · US 50.6This facility: 48.0, 5% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
48.0%
↓ 5% · US 50.6This facility: 48.0, 5% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · DC 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the DC average of 0.8 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · DC 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the DC average of 0.8 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 50% · DC 66.5This facility: 100.0, 50% above the DC average of 66.5 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 50% · DC 66.5This facility: 100.0, 50% above the DC average of 66.5 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
90.6%
↑ 24% · DC 73.2This facility: 90.6, 24% above the DC average of 73.2 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
90.6%
↑ 24% · DC 73.2This facility: 90.6, 24% above the DC average of 73.2 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
13.8%
↓ 24% · DC 18.1This facility: 13.8, 24% below the DC average of 18.1 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
13.8%
↓ 24% · DC 18.1This facility: 13.8, 24% below the DC average of 18.1 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
2.7%
↓ 63% · DC 7.2This facility: 2.7, 63% below the DC average of 7.2 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
2.7%
↓ 63% · DC 7.2This facility: 2.7, 63% below the DC average of 7.2 (among DC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Lisner-Louise-Dickson-Hurt-Home’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending June 2025. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Jun 2025
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−43.1% operating margin
+39.4 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 7 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($9.4M) turns it into a net profit to $5.0M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends more on payroll than most District of Columbia homes
94.2% payroll share of revenue
DC average 55.8%
Payroll rose $0.7M while revenue rose $2.2M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2025 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2025 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with District of Columbia homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2025 | vs prior year | Trend 2018 → 2025Trend | DC median | Compared with DC homesRank in DC | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $10.2M | +$2.2M | Trend 20182025 | DC median $28.6M | Rank in DC Not ranked | Not ranked No state rank for this year: homes are ranked only when their latest cost report is recent enough to compare. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $14.6M | +$0.0M | Trend 20182025 | DC median — | Rank in DC Not ranked | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$4.4M | +$2.2M | Trend 20182025 | DC median — | Rank in DC Not ranked | Loss, narrowing Resident care lost money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −43.1% | +39.4 pts | Trend 20182025 | DC median — | Rank in DC Not ranked | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $9.4M | — | Trend — | DC median — | Rank in DC Not ranked | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $5.0M | −$2.6M | Trend — | DC median — | Rank in DC Not ranked | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends more of revenue on staff than most District of Columbia homes
| Metric | FY 2025 | vs prior year | Trend 2018 → 2025Trend | DC median | Compared with DC homesRank in DC | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $9.6M | +$0.7M | Trend 20182025 | DC median $13.1M | Rank in DC Not ranked | Not ranked No state rank for this year: homes are ranked only when their latest cost report is recent enough to compare. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 94.2% | −16.9 pts | Trend 20182025 | DC median 51.6% | Rank in DC Not ranked | 38.4 pts over DC average The DC average is 55.8% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2018–2025 2 charts · DC benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the District of Columbia payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin DC payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2018–2025 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $9.4M | $7.6M | $10.0M | $9.3M | $8.8M | $10.2M | $8.0M | $10.2M |
| Operating expenses | $13.2M | $12.4M | $13.7M | $11.1M | $14.0M | $6.4M | $14.6M | $14.6M |
| Net patient income | −$3.8M | −$4.8M | −$3.8M | −$1.8M | −$5.3M | $3.7M | −$6.6M | −$4.4M |
| Operating margin | −40.4% | −62.5% | −37.7% | −19.4% | −60.1% | 36.8% | −82.4% | −43.1% |
| Net income | −$0.9M | −$1.1M | −$1.7M | $3.2M | −$2.9M | $5.2M | $7.6M | $5.0M |
| Payroll costs | $7.8M | $6.8M | $8.7M | $9.1M | $9.3M | $2.1M | $8.9M | $9.6M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 82.8% | 89.4% | 87.0% | 97.4% | 106.3% | 20.7% | 111.1% | 94.2% |
| Beds | 116 | 116 | 116 | 116 | 116 | 116 | 116 | 116 |
| Gross revenue | $11.5M | $9.4M | $12.1M | $10.6M | $9.2M | $11.2M | $8.0M | $10.2M |
| Salaries | $6.5M | $5.8M | $7.4M | $7.6M | $7.8M | $1.0M | $7.3M | $8.0M |
| Wage-related costs | $1.3M | $1.0M | $1.2M | $1.5M | $1.5M | $1.1M | $1.6M | $1.7M |
| Contract labor | $0.2M | $0.2M | $0.1M | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other operating costs | $5.4M | $5.6M | $5.1M | $2.1M | $4.7M | $4.3M | $5.7M | $5.0M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $302 | $241 | $327 | $398 | $388 | $467 | $420 | $489 |
| Cost per day | $424 | $391 | $450 | $476 | $621 | $295 | $767 | $699 |
| Average length of stay | 100.5 days | 120.4 days | 91.9 days | 172.6 days | 333.1 days | 322.6 days | 208.9 days | 454.7 days |
Showing 2025–2023 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2025
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Jun 2026
Arriving
59 admissions · FY2025
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
57 · 97%
Medicaid
1 · 2%
Private pay & other
1 · 2%
Resident snapshot
58 residents · Jun 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
4 · 7%
Medicaid
49 · 84%
Private pay & other
5 · 9%
Leaving
46 discharges · FY2025
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
44 · 96%
Medicaid
1 · 2%
Private pay & other
1 · 2%
Mostly short-term rehab stays
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Places of interest near Lisner-Louise-Dickson-Hurt-Home
5.3 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Washington's city center to Lisner-Louise-Dickson-Hurt-Home's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 2.23 miles to nearest hospital (Sibley Memorial Hospital)
Calculate Travel Distance to Lisner-Louise-Dickson-Hurt-Home
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Washington, DC
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the DC Dept. of Health, senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
RESC (Residential Care):
Personal care and daily-living support in a smaller, more intimate residential setting.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
CCRC (Continuing Care Retirement Community):
A campus with multiple care levels so residents can age in place without moving.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The District of Columbia average is: 55.8% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lisner-Louise-Dickson-Hurt-Home | NH AL RESC SNF | Washington (Northwest D.C) | 60 | A- |
92.7%
Facility
92.7%
DC AVG
79.6%
Rank
#3 / 10 | +16% | 4.66 | -6% | -21% | $0
Facility
$0
DC AVG
$132.3k
Rank
#1 / 10 | 19
Facility
19
DC AVG
63.5
Rank
#1 / 10 | 4.8
Facility
4.8
DC AVG
10.5
Rank
#1 / 10 | - | 56 | - | 91 | Jonathan Plater | $10.2MFiscal year ending 06/2025 | $9.6MFiscal year ending 06/2025 | 94.2%Fiscal year ending 06/2025 | 095025 | ||||
| Forest Hills of DC | NH AL MC RC SNF | Washington (Northwest D.C) | 55 | C+ |
86.9%
Facility
86.9%
DC AVG
79.6%
Rank
#4 / 10 | +9% | 4.68 | +10% | -21% | $0
Facility
$0
DC AVG
$132.3k
Rank
#1 / 10 | 46
Facility
46
DC AVG
63.5
Rank
#5 / 10 | 9.2
Facility
9.2
DC AVG
10.5
Rank
#4 / 10 | 1 | 48 | - | 79 | Scott Taylor | $14.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024 | $7.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024 | 55.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024 | 095038 | ||||
| Sibley Memorial Hosp Renaissance | NH SNF | Washington (Northwest D.C) | 45 | ? |
53.1%
Facility
53.1%
DC AVG
79.6%
Rank
#7 / 10 | -33% | 7.39 | +70% | +25% | $8.8k
Facility
$8.8k
DC AVG
$132.3k
Rank
#5 / 10 | 34
Facility
34
DC AVG
63.5
Rank
#2 / 10 | 6.8
Facility
6.8
DC AVG
10.5
Rank
#2 / 10 | 2 | 24 | - | 26 | - | - | - | - | 095030 | ||||
| Unique Rehabilitation & Health Center | NH SNF | Washington (Northwest D.C) | 230 | D- |
97.1%
Facility
97.1%
DC AVG
79.6%
Rank
#2 / 10 | +22% | 4.47 | -40% | -24% | $48.9k
Facility
$48.9k
DC AVG
$132.3k
Rank
#7 / 10 | 72
Facility
72
DC AVG
63.5
Rank
#8 / 10 | 12.0
Facility
12.0
DC AVG
10.5
Rank
#8 / 10 | 4 | 223 | - | 92 | Regina Kim | $34.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024 | $17.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024 | 51.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024 | 095036 | ||||
| Knollwood Life Plan Community | NH AL CCRC IL MC SNF | Washington (Northwest D.C) | 69 | ? |
55.2%
Facility
55.2%
DC AVG
79.6%
Rank
#10 / 10 | -31% | 8.63 | -4% | +46% | $0
Facility
$0
DC AVG
$132.3k
Rank
#1 / 10 | 39
Facility
39
DC AVG
63.5
Rank
#3 / 10 | 7.8
Facility
7.8
DC AVG
10.5
Rank
#3 / 10 | 3 | 38 | - | 15 | Sonja Brooks | $19.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024 | $11.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024 | 55.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024 | 095026 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other DC nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Lisner-Louise-Dickson-Hurt-Home
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Is Lisner-Louise-Dickson-Hurt-Home in a walkable area?
Lisner-Louise-Dickson-Hurt-Home has a walk score of 91. Walker's paradise. Daily errands do not require a car, with many shops and services nearby.
02 What is the occupancy rate at Lisner-Louise-Dickson-Hurt-Home?
Lisner-Louise-Dickson-Hurt-Home's occupancy is 92.7%.
03 Are pets allowed at Lisner-Louise-Dickson-Hurt-Home?
No, Lisner-Louise-Dickson-Hurt-Home has a no-pet policy.
04 Does Lisner-Louise-Dickson-Hurt-Home operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Lisner-Louise-Dickson-Hurt-Home is registered as a non-profit.
05 What is the overall rating for Lisner-Louise-Dickson-Hurt-Home?
Lisner-Louise-Dickson-Hurt-Home received a 5-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
06 How many beds does Lisner-Louise-Dickson-Hurt-Home have?
Lisner-Louise-Dickson-Hurt-Home has 60 beds.
07 Are there photos of Lisner-Louise-Dickson-Hurt-Home?
Yes — there are 12 photos of Lisner-Louise-Dickson-Hurt-Home in the photo gallery on this page.
Updated on
