Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
102
31 employees · 71 contractors · 36 on an average day Leakesville Rehabilitation & Nursing Center
Nursing Home, Palliative Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Leakesville, MS
ALM Inspection Grade
A-
ALM's inspection grade is 91 / 100, an A- — 8 points above the Mississippi average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 91 / 100, an A- — 8 points above the Mississippi average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Leakesville Rehabilitation & Nursing Center
Nursing Home, Palliative Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Leakesville, MS
ALM Inspection Grade
A-
ALM's inspection grade is 91 / 100, an A- — 8 points above the Mississippi average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 91 / 100, an A- — 8 points above the Mississippi average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Leakesville Rehabilitation & Nursing Center accepts Medicaid, Medicare, and private pay.
Overview of Leakesville Rehabilitation & Nursing Center
Leakesville Rehabilitation & Nursing Center in Leakesville, Mississippi, offers skilled nursing, palliative services, and respite care within a 60-bed capacity. Short-term rehabilitation programs support individuals recovering from surgery or a stroke, while ongoing clinical capabilities include IV therapy, hydration, diabetes oversight, pain management, ostomy care, tube feeding, and respiratory therapy. Transportation to local dialysis appointments is also provided.
Daily nurse staffing averages 4 hours and 42 minutes per resident across the facility. Administrator E. Baughman leads operations alongside operator April. Accepted payment options encompass Medicare for eligible short-term skilled care, Medicaid for long-term residential coverage, and private funding.
Older adults and their representatives are encouraged to contact Leakesville Rehabilitation & Nursing Center directly to learn more about specific admission guidelines, check unit availability, or review payment plans.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 39th out of 113 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 42m
This nursing home is ranked 39th out of 113 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 42mStandout metric: LPN / LVN is +28% above Mississippi average
3 of 6 metrics below Mississippi average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 12 total: 7 of the facility's own employees and 5 agency contractors.
12 staff · 9.1-hour shifts
36m
↓ 5% · MS 38mThis facility: 36m per resident per day, 5% below the Mississippi average of 38m (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 12 total: 7 of the facility's own employees and 5 agency contractors.
12 staff · 9.1-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 18 total: 3 of the facility's own employees and 15 agency contractors.
18 staff · 8.5-hour shifts
1h 24m
↑ 28% · MS 1h 6mThis facility: 1h 24m per resident per day, 28% above the Mississippi average of 1h 6m (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 18 total: 3 of the facility's own employees and 15 agency contractors.
18 staff · 8.5-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 38 total: 4 of the facility's own employees and 34 agency contractors.
38 staff · 7.4-hour shifts
2h 42m
↑ 9% · MS 2h 29mThis facility: 2h 42m per resident per day, 9% above the Mississippi average of 2h 29m (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 38 total: 4 of the facility's own employees and 34 agency contractors.
38 staff · 7.4-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 20m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 20m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
1m
↓ 71% · MS 2mThis facility: 1m per resident per day, 71% below the Mississippi average of 2m (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
3h 53m
↑ 10% · MS 3h 31mThis facility: 3h 53m per resident per day, 10% above the Mississippi average of 3h 31m (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
17m
↓ 21% · MS 22mThis facility: 17m per resident per day, 21% below the Mississippi average of 22m (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 28m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 28m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
102
31 employees · 71 contractors · 36 on an average day
102 total staff / 46 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
2.22 : 1
↑ 34% · MS 1.66This facility: 2.22 staff per resident, 34% above the Mississippi average of 1.66 (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
102 staff ÷ 46 residents
See full Mississippi ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.8 h
↓ 3% · MS 8 hThis facility: 7.8 h, 3% below the Mississippi average of 8 h (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
25,417 staff hours this quarter
See full Mississippi ranking →30.7% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Mississippi average: 89.4% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (34), Licensed Practical Nurse (15), Registered Nurse (5), Speech Language Pathologist (3), Qualified Social Worker (3), Qualified Activities Professional (3), Physical Therapy Assistant (2), Respiratory Therapy Technician (2), Physical Therapy Aide (1), RN Director of Nursing (1), Occupational Therapy Aide (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
60
Rank #67 / 124Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 67th out of 124 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Mississippi facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
60
Rank #67 / 124Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 67th out of 124 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Mississippi facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Walk Score
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #58 / 122Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 58th out of 122 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Mississippi facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #58 / 122Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 58th out of 122 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Mississippi facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
43
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #104 / 116Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 104th out of 116 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Mississippi average, with its Statewide rank out of 116. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #104 / 116Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 104th out of 116 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Mississippi average, with its Statewide rank out of 116. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
76.7%
This home usually has availability
Based on 46 residents and 60 beds. Source: state inspection report (Aug 2026)
Lower than the Mississippi average: 86.8%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
188
days
About This Community
Facility TypeNursing Home
CountyGreene
CMS Certification Number255179
Leakesville Rehabilitation & Nursing Center is legally operated by April, and administered by E. Baughman.
Ownership TypeProprietary
Resident Council
Short-Term Rehab
Respiratory Therapy
Stroke RehabilitationTherapy after a stroke to improve movement, speech, thinking, or daily living skills and support recovery and independence.
Post-Surgery Recovery Care
IV Therapy/Hydration
Diabetes Management
Pain Management
Ostomy CareCare for a stoma and the attached pouch after surgery, such as for a colostomy or ileostomy. Proper care helps prevent skin problems and infection.
Tube Feedings
Noninvasive Vent Care
Disease Management (COPD
Therapeutic Diets
Palliative CareCare focused on relieving pain, symptoms, and stress while supporting quality of life. It can be provided alongside treatment for a serious illness.
Respite CareRespite care provides families and unpaid caregivers with short-term relief from caregiving duties. Care can range from a few hours to a few weeks.
TransportationListed as: Transportation to Dialysis
Pets not allowed
Activities
Arts & Crafts
Bingo
Games
Movie Nights
Prayer Services
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
91 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
8 points above the Mississippi average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Typical
29 severity-weighted points (13 deficiencies) · 41% lower than the typical CMS-certified MS facility (median: 49)
Enforcement
Strong
No fines on record · 0 enforcement actions
Persistence
Concern
38 days to fix issues · slower than the typical CMS-certified MS facility (median: 33)
Total health inspections
4
↓ 15% · MS 4.7This facility: 4, 15% below the MS average of 4.7 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
13
Rank #39 / 114Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 39th out of 114 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Mississippi State average, with a ranking across all 114 MS facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 29% · MS 18.4This facility: 13, 29% below the MS average of 18.4 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
3.25
Rank #41 / 114Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 41st out of 114 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Mississippi mean across 114 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 18% · MS 3.95This facility: 3.25, 18% below the MS average of 3.95 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
13 of 13 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · MS 0.8This facility: 0, 100% below the MS average of 0.8 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · MS 1.2This facility: 0, 100% below the MS average of 1.2 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
13
↓ 20% · MS 16.2This facility: 13, 20% below the MS average of 16.2 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · MS 0.3This facility: 0, 100% below the MS average of 0.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Nov 18, 2025 · 5 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 4 of 13 citations · 5 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Nov 18, 2025
5 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jul 02, 2024
1 citation
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
May 09, 2024
6 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 09, 2022
1 citation
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 13 citations
Quality of Life & Care
4 deficiencies (31%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
3 deficiencies (23%)
Nutrition & Dietary
3 deficiencies (23%)
Resident Rights
2 deficiencies (15%)
Infection Control
1 deficiency (8%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
11 of 13 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 2 of 13 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Oct 2023.
Total fines
$0
MS avg $30KMississippi average: $29,592. Average among the 109 Mississippi facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
MS avg 2.11Mississippi average: 2.11. Average among the 109 Mississippi facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
MS avg 0.18Mississippi average: 0.18. Average among the 109 Mississippi facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Mississippi average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
1
/ 5
Significantly below average
↓ 50% · MS 2.0This facility: 1.0, 50% below the MS average of 2.0 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
1
/ 5
Significantly below average
↓ 48% · MS 1.9This facility: 1.0, 48% below the MS average of 1.9 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
11.2
Score · lower is better
↑ 4% · MS 10.8This facility: 11.2, 4% above the MS average of 10.8 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
20.0
Score · lower is better
↑ 3% · MS 19.4This facility: 20.0, 3% above the MS average of 19.4 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 5 better, 7 worse, 1 near MS average
7 short-stay measures: 3 better, 2 worse, 2 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
17.5%
↓ 14% · MS 20.3This facility: 17.5, 14% below the MS average of 20.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
17.5%
↓ 14% · MS 20.3This facility: 17.5, 14% below the MS average of 20.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
21.4%
↑ 17% · MS 18.3This facility: 21.4, 17% above the MS average of 18.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
21.4%
↑ 17% · MS 18.3This facility: 21.4, 17% above the MS average of 18.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
21.0%
↑ 6% · MS 19.9This facility: 21.0, 6% above the MS average of 19.9 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
21.0%
↑ 6% · MS 19.9This facility: 21.0, 6% above the MS average of 19.9 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.4%
↑ 74% · MS 2.5This facility: 4.4, 74% above the MS average of 2.5 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.4%
↑ 74% · MS 2.5This facility: 4.4, 74% above the MS average of 2.5 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.1%
↓ 33% · MS 3.1This facility: 2.1, 33% below the MS average of 3.1 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.1%
↓ 33% · MS 3.1This facility: 2.1, 33% below the MS average of 3.1 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
11.9%
↑ 93% · MS 6.2This facility: 11.9, 93% above the MS average of 6.2 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
11.9%
↑ 93% · MS 6.2This facility: 11.9, 93% above the MS average of 6.2 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.3%
↓ 48% · MS 6.3This facility: 3.3, 48% below the MS average of 6.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.3%
↓ 48% · MS 6.3This facility: 3.3, 48% below the MS average of 6.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · MS 1.6This facility: 0.0, 100% below the MS average of 1.6 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · MS 1.6This facility: 0.0, 100% below the MS average of 1.6 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
24.8%
↑ 14% · MS 21.8This facility: 24.8, 14% above the MS average of 21.8 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
24.8%
↑ 14% · MS 21.8This facility: 24.8, 14% above the MS average of 21.8 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 5% · MS 95.3This facility: 100.0, 5% above the MS average of 95.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 5% · MS 95.3This facility: 100.0, 5% above the MS average of 95.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.2%
↑ 1% · MS 97.3This facility: 98.2, 1% above the MS average of 97.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.2%
↑ 1% · MS 97.3This facility: 98.2, 1% above the MS average of 97.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
3.42
↑ 40% · MS 2.44This facility: 3.42, 40% above the MS average of 2.44 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
3.42
↑ 40% · MS 2.44This facility: 3.42, 40% above the MS average of 2.44 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
5.72
↑ 99% · MS 2.88This facility: 5.72, 99% above the MS average of 2.88 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
5.72
↑ 99% · MS 2.88This facility: 5.72, 99% above the MS average of 2.88 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 7 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
44.0%
↓ 18% · US 53.7This facility: 44.0, 18% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
44.0%
↓ 18% · US 53.7This facility: 44.0, 18% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · MS 2.4This facility: 0.0, 100% below the MS average of 2.4 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · MS 2.4This facility: 0.0, 100% below the MS average of 2.4 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 12% · MS 89.0This facility: 100.0, 12% above the MS average of 89.0 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 12% · MS 89.0This facility: 100.0, 12% above the MS average of 89.0 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 18% · MS 85.0This facility: 100.0, 18% above the MS average of 85.0 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 18% · MS 85.0This facility: 100.0, 18% above the MS average of 85.0 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
35.4%
↑ 27% · MS 27.9This facility: 35.4, 27% above the MS average of 27.9 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
35.4%
↑ 27% · MS 27.9This facility: 35.4, 27% above the MS average of 27.9 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
24.8%
↑ 62% · MS 15.3This facility: 24.8, 62% above the MS average of 15.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
24.8%
↑ 62% · MS 15.3This facility: 24.8, 62% above the MS average of 15.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Leakesville Rehabilitation & Nursing Center’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 108 Mississippi nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Breaking even on care
1.0% operating margin
−1.6 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 4 of the last 8 reported years. Net income $0.1M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Mississippi homes
24.2% payroll share of revenue
MS average 49.5%Rank #108 / 108Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 108th out of 108 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Mississippi average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.2M while revenue rose $1.1M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Mississippi homes.
Revenue & profit
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | MS median | Compared with MS homesRank in MS | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $6.3M | +$1.1M | Trend 20172024 | MS median $8.2M | Rank in MS Rank #87 / 108Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 87th out of 108 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Mississippi average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 20% of homes | Below MS median Higher net patient revenue than 20% of MS homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $6.3M | +$1.2M | Trend 20172024 | MS median $8.4M | Rank in MS Rank #89 / 108Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 89th out of 108 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Mississippi homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 18% of homes | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $0.1M | −$0.1M | Trend 20172024 | MS median $0.4M | Rank in MS Rank #80 / 108Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 80th out of 108 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Mississippi homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 26% of homes | Profit, shrinking Resident care made money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 1.0% | −1.6 pts | Trend 20172024 | MS median 5.2% | Rank in MS Rank #79 / 108Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 79th out of 108 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Mississippi homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 27% of homes | Thin margin A margin from 0% to 5% of revenue leaves little room for unexpected costs. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.0M | — | Trend — | MS median $0.1M | Rank in MS Rank #71 / 108Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 71st out of 108 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Mississippi homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 35% of homes | Adds to profit Income from outside resident care, on top of the profit from care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $0.1M | −$0.0M | Trend — | MS median $0.5M | Rank in MS Rank #81 / 108Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 81st out of 108 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Mississippi homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 25% of homes | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Mississippi homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | MS median | Compared with MS homesRank in MS | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $1.5M | +$0.2M | Trend 20172024 | MS median $4.1M | Rank in MS Rank #108 / 108Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 108th out of 108 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Mississippi average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 0% of homes | Below MS median Higher payroll than 0% of MS homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 24.2% | −1.2 pts | Trend 20172024 | MS median 47.0% | Rank in MS Rank #108 / 108Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 108th out of 108 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Mississippi average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 0% of homes | 25.3 pts under MS average The MS average is 49.5% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · MS benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Mississippi payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin MS payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $4.7M | $4.5M | $4.6M | $4.0M | $4.3M | $5.2M | $5.2M | $6.3M |
| Operating expenses | $4.7M | $4.3M | $4.6M | $4.8M | $5.6M | $5.4M | $5.1M | $6.3M |
| Net patient income | $0.0M | $0.2M | −$0.0M | −$0.8M | −$1.3M | −$0.2M | $0.1M | $0.1M |
| Operating margin | 0.4% | 5.4% | −0.2% | −19.1% | −31.0% | −4.5% | 2.7% | 1.0% |
| Net income | $0.0M | $0.2M | −$0.0M | $0.1M | −$0.5M | $0.5M | $0.1M | $0.1M |
| Payroll costs | $2.2M | $2.2M | $2.4M | $2.2M | $2.4M | $2.1M | $1.3M | $1.5M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 47.7% | 49.5% | 51.0% | 55.5% | 55.5% | 41.4% | 25.4% | 24.2% |
| Beds | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 |
| Gross revenue | $5.2M | $4.6M | $4.9M | $4.2M | $4.3M | $5.0M | $5.9M | $7.0M |
| Salaries | $1.9M | $1.9M | $2.0M | $1.9M | $2.0M | $1.8M | $1.1M | $1.3M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.4M | $0.3M | $0.3M | $0.3M | $0.4M | $0.3M | $0.2M | $0.2M |
| Contract labor | $0.3M | $0.2M | $0.3M | $0.4M | $0.7M | $1.0M | $1.5M | $1.8M |
| Other operating costs | $2.4M | $2.0M | $2.3M | $2.6M | $3.2M | $3.3M | $3.8M | $4.7M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $239 | $243 | $239 | $244 | $240 | $291 | $306 | $320 |
| Cost per day | $238 | $230 | $240 | $291 | $315 | $304 | $298 | $316 |
| Average length of stay | 206.9 days | 260.5 days | 243.9 days | 256.8 days | 243.0 days | 371.4 days | 335.0 days | 188.4 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
109 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
32 · 29%
Medicaid
14 · 13%
Private pay & other
63 · 58%
Resident snapshot
46 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
2 · 4%
Medicaid
38 · 83%
Private pay & other
6 · 13%
Leaving
105 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
38 · 36%
Medicaid
22 · 21%
Private pay & other
45 · 43%
Mix of rehab and long-term care
This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.
Places of interest near Leakesville Rehabilitation & Nursing Center
0.0 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Leakesville's city center to Leakesville Rehabilitation & Nursing Center's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Leakesville Rehabilitation & Nursing Center
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around the area
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the MS State Dept. of Health (MSDH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Mississippi average is: 49.5% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Community Place | NH SNF | Brandon | 60
Facility
60
MS AVG
88
Rank
#67 / 124 | A |
88.3%
Facility
88.3%
MS AVG
86.8%
Rank
#49 / 116 | +2% | 5.41
Facility
5.41
MS AVG
4.95
Rank
#21 / 113 | -57% | +9% | $0
Facility
$0
MS AVG
$29.3k
Rank
#1 / 115 | 14
Facility
14
MS AVG
18.4
Rank
#40 / 114 | 4.7
Facility
4.7
MS AVG
3.9
Rank
#83 / 114 | - | 53 | - |
16
Facility
16
MS AVG
39
Rank
#103 / 122 | Community Place Charles | $8.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
$9.0M
Rank
#55 / 108 | $4.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$4.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
$4.3M
Rank
#45 / 108 | 55.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
55.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
49.5%
Rank
#22 / 108 | 255285 | ||||
| Trend Health & Rehab of Brookhaven, LLC | NH SNF | Brookhaven | 60
Facility
60
MS AVG
88
Rank
#67 / 124 | A |
88.3%
Facility
88.3%
MS AVG
86.8%
Rank
#49 / 116 | +2% | 4.65
Facility
4.65
MS AVG
4.95
Rank
#49 / 113 | -61% | -6% | $0
Facility
$0
MS AVG
$29.3k
Rank
#1 / 115 | 13
Facility
13
MS AVG
18.4
Rank
#40 / 114 | 4.3
Facility
4.3
MS AVG
3.9
Rank
#51 / 114 | - | 53 | - |
69
Facility
69
MS AVG
39
Rank
#6 / 122 | Randall R | $5.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
$9.0M
Rank
#96 / 108 | $2.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$2.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
$4.3M
Rank
#98 / 108 | 46.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
46.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
49.5%
Rank
#59 / 108 | 255162 | ||||
| Bedford Care Center of Petal | NH MC SNF | Petal | 60
Facility
60
MS AVG
88
Rank
#67 / 124 | B+ |
91.7%
Facility
91.7%
MS AVG
86.8%
Rank
#35 / 116 | +6% | 3.94
Facility
3.94
MS AVG
4.95
Rank
#103 / 113 | -2% | -20% | $22.2k
Facility
$22.2k
MS AVG
$29.3k
Rank
#90 / 115 | 7
Facility
7
MS AVG
18.4
Rank
#7 / 114 | 1.8
Facility
1.8
MS AVG
3.9
Rank
#4 / 114 | - | 55 | - |
27
Facility
27
MS AVG
39
Rank
#86 / 122 | Bedford Care Center-Petal LLC | $6.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$6.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
$9.0M
Rank
#84 / 108 | $3.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$3.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
$4.3M
Rank
#83 / 108 | 48.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
48.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
49.5%
Rank
#43 / 108 | 255149 | ||||
| Sunshine Health Care | NH SNF | North Pontotoc | 60
Facility
60
MS AVG
88
Rank
#67 / 124 | A |
88.3%
Facility
88.3%
MS AVG
86.8%
Rank
#49 / 116 | +2% | 7.84
Facility
7.84
MS AVG
4.95
Rank
#3 / 113 | -22% | +58% | $0
Facility
$0
MS AVG
$29.3k
Rank
#1 / 115 | 5
Facility
5
MS AVG
18.4
Rank
#4 / 114 | 1.7
Facility
1.7
MS AVG
3.9
Rank
#1 / 114 | - | 53 | - |
46
Facility
46
MS AVG
39
Rank
#52 / 122 | Sunshine Health Care, Inc | $7.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
$9.0M
Rank
#61 / 108 | $4.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$4.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
$4.3M
Rank
#44 / 108 | 60.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
60.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
49.5%
Rank
#10 / 108 | 255319 | ||||
| Leakesville Rehabilitation & Nursing Center | NH PC RC SNF | Leakesville | 60
Facility
60
MS AVG
88
Rank
#67 / 124 | A- |
76.7%
Facility
76.7%
MS AVG
86.8%
Rank
#104 / 116 | -12% | 4.71
Facility
4.71
MS AVG
4.95
Rank
#39 / 113 | +20% | -5% | $0
Facility
$0
MS AVG
$29.3k
Rank
#1 / 115 | 13
Facility
13
MS AVG
18.4
Rank
#39 / 114 | 3.3
Facility
3.3
MS AVG
3.9
Rank
#41 / 114 | - | 46 | - |
43
Facility
43
MS AVG
39
Rank
#58 / 122 | April | $6.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$6.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
$9.0M
Rank
#87 / 108 | $1.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$1.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
$4.3M
Rank
#108 / 108 | 24.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
24.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
49.5%
Rank
#108 / 108 | 255179 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other MS nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Leakesville Rehabilitation & Nursing Center
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Who is the owner of Leakesville Rehabilitation & Nursing Center?
Leakesville Rehabilitation & Nursing Center is legally operated by April, and administered by E. Baughman.
02 Is Leakesville Rehabilitation & Nursing Center in a walkable area?
Leakesville Rehabilitation & Nursing Center has a walk score of 43. Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
03 What is the occupancy rate at Leakesville Rehabilitation & Nursing Center?
Leakesville Rehabilitation & Nursing Center's occupancy is 76.7%.
04 Are pets allowed at Leakesville Rehabilitation & Nursing Center?
No, Leakesville Rehabilitation & Nursing Center has a no-pet policy.
05 Does Leakesville Rehabilitation & Nursing Center operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Leakesville Rehabilitation & Nursing Center is registered as a for-profit in MS.
06 Who is the administrator of Leakesville Rehabilitation & Nursing Center?
E. Baughman is the administrator of Leakesville Rehabilitation & Nursing Center.
07 What is the overall rating for Leakesville Rehabilitation & Nursing Center?
Leakesville Rehabilitation & Nursing Center received a 3-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
Updated on
