Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
105
97 employees · 8 contractors · 36 on an average day Life Care Center of Scottsdale
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · Scottsdale, AZ
ALM Inspection Grade
B+
ALM's inspection grade is 88 / 100, a B+ — 3 points above the Arizona average for CMS-certified facilities (85/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 88 / 100, a B+ — 3 points above the Arizona average for CMS-certified facilities (85/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Life Care Center of Scottsdale
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · Scottsdale, AZ
ALM Inspection Grade
B+
ALM's inspection grade is 88 / 100, a B+ — 3 points above the Arizona average for CMS-certified facilities (85/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 88 / 100, a B+ — 3 points above the Arizona average for CMS-certified facilities (85/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Life Care Center of Scottsdale accepts Medicare and private pay.
Life Care Center of Scottsdale provides nursing home and skilled nursing care in Scottsdale, AZ. Skilled nursing provides licensed nursing care on site around the clock, making the community a possible fit for a resident who needs ongoing clinical oversight. The home is in the Central Scottsdale neighborhood and has 132 beds.
Payment options are Medicare and private pay. Medicare can cover short-term skilled care after a hospital stay, while private pay means the resident or family pays directly. Total nurse staffing is 3h 40m per resident per day, representing the daily nurse staffing time counted for each resident. Liviu Iliescu serves as the administrator.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 32nd out of 60 nursing homes we track in Arizona for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 40m
This nursing home is ranked 32nd out of 60 nursing homes we track in Arizona for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 40mStandout metric: Physical therapist is +190% above Arizona average
4 of 6 metrics below Arizona average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 6 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
6 staff · 9.2-hour shifts
37m
↓ 13% · AZ 43mThis facility: 37m per resident per day, 13% below the Arizona average of 43m (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 6 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
6 staff · 9.2-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 19 total: 18 of the facility's own employees and 1 agency contractor.
19 staff · 9.8-hour shifts
1h 9m
↑ 10% · AZ 1h 3mThis facility: 1h 9m per resident per day, 10% above the Arizona average of 1h 3m (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 19 total: 18 of the facility's own employees and 1 agency contractor.
19 staff · 9.8-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 34 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
34 staff · 9.3-hour shifts
1h 53m
↓ 20% · AZ 2h 22mThis facility: 1h 53m per resident per day, 20% below the Arizona average of 2h 22m (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 34 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
34 staff · 9.3-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 21m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
17m
↑ 190% · AZ 6mThis facility: 17m per resident per day, 190% above the Arizona average of 6m (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
3h 14m
↓ 11% · AZ 3h 38mThis facility: 3h 14m per resident per day, 11% below the Arizona average of 3h 38m (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
23m
↓ 27% · AZ 31mThis facility: 23m per resident per day, 27% below the Arizona average of 31m (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
105
97 employees · 8 contractors · 36 on an average day
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8.5 h
≈ 0% · AZ 8.5 hThis facility: 8.5 h, level with the Arizona average of 8.5 h (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
27,874 staff hours this quarter
See full Arizona ranking →99% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Arizona average: 94.4% · Contractors this quarter: Occupational Therapy Assistant (4), Occupational Therapy Aide (2), Licensed Practical Nurse (1), Medical Director (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
132
Rank #18 / 80Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 18th out of 80 nursing homes we track in Arizona for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Arizona facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
132
Rank #18 / 80Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 18th out of 80 nursing homes we track in Arizona for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Arizona facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
Walk Score
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #44 / 82Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 44th out of 82 nursing homes we track in Arizona for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Arizona facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #44 / 82Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 44th out of 82 nursing homes we track in Arizona for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Arizona facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
38
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #52 / 55Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 52nd out of 55 nursing homes we track in Arizona for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Arizona average, with its Statewide rank out of 55. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #52 / 55Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 52nd out of 55 nursing homes we track in Arizona for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Arizona average, with its Statewide rank out of 55. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
44.9%
This home usually has availability
Based on 59.3 residents and 132 beds. Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Lower than the Arizona average: 75.4%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
19
days
About This Community
Facility TypeNursing Care Institution
StatusActive
IssuanceJanuary 1, 1900
ExpirationNovember 30, 2026 Expires in 20 days
License NumberNCI-395
CMS Certification Number035143
QualificationHealth Care
U.S. News & World Report Best Senior Living (2026)An annual U.S. News & World Report recognition based on surveys and other information about senior-living communities, including resident experience, care, activities, dining, and management.
Life Care Center of Scottsdale is legally operated by Life Care Center Of Scottsdale, and administered by Liviu Iliescu.
OwnerCove Associates, LLC
Physical Therapy
Occupational Therapy
Speech Therapy
Post-Surgical Care
Fall PreventionPrograms and practices designed to reduce falls, such as balance support, safer surroundings and medication or mobility reviews. Fall prevention can help protect independence and prevent injuries.
Infection ManagementProcesses to prevent, recognize, and treat infections, including monitoring symptoms and using appropriate precautions and medical care.
IV Therapy
Wound CareCare for wounds such as pressure sores, surgical wounds, or ulcers, including assessment, dressing changes, and monitoring for infection.
Dietitian
Discharge Planning
Pre-Admission Program
Social Work & Case Management
Pets not allowed
Beauty Salon
Emergency Call System
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
88 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
3 points above the Arizona average for CMS-certified facilities (85/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Typical
25 severity-weighted points (15 deficiencies) · 34% lower than the typical CMS-certified AZ facility (median: 38)
Enforcement
Concern
1 enforcement action · above the typical CMS-certified AZ facility (median: 0) · $6,414 in fines
Persistence
Typical
35 days to fix issues · faster than the typical CMS-certified AZ facility (median: 41)
Total health inspections
5
↓ 25% · AZ 6.7This facility: 5, 25% below the Arizona average of 6.7 (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
15
Rank #24 / 61Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 24th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Arizona for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Arizona State average, with a ranking across all 61 AZ facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 29% · AZ 21.2This facility: 15, 29% below the Arizona average of 21.2 (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
3
Rank #26 / 61Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 26th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Arizona for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Arizona mean across 61 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 10% · AZ 3.34This facility: 3, 10% below the Arizona average of 3.34 (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
15 of 15 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · AZ 0.1This facility: 0, 100% below the Arizona average of 0.1 (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
1
↑ 100% · AZ 0.5This facility: 1, 100% above the Arizona average of 0.5 (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
14
↓ 32% · AZ 20.6This facility: 14, 32% below the Arizona average of 20.6 (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · AZ 0.1This facility: 0, 100% below the Arizona average of 0.1 (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Feb 12, 2026 · 1 citation (Care Planning, moderate), corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 8 of 15 citations · 5 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Feb 12, 2026
1 citation
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
May 14, 2025
1 citation
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Sep 12, 2024
4 citations
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jun 04, 2024
2 citations
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 19, 2023
7 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 15 citations
Quality of Life & Care
8 deficiencies (53%)
Resident Rights
3 deficiencies (20%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
2 deficiencies (13%)
Infection Control
1 deficiency (7%)
Nutrition & Dietary
1 deficiency (7%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
8 of 15 citations resulted from standard inspections; 4 of 15 resulted from complaint investigations; and 3 of 15 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
1 penalty in the past 3 years
Latest: Sep 12, 2024 · $6,414 civil money penalty
Sep 12, 2024 · $6,414 civil money penalty
Total fines
$6,414
↓ 80% · AZ $32KThis facility: $6,414, 80% below the Arizona average of $31,656. Average among the 40 Arizona facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #51 / 61Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 51st out of 61 nursing homes we track in Arizona for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Arizona average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 61 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
1
↓ 37% · AZ 1.58This facility: 1, 37% below the Arizona average of 1.58. Average among the 40 Arizona facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
AZ avg 0.1Arizona average: 0.1. Average among the 40 Arizona facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Sep 12, 2024
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$6,414
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$6,414Fine amount comparison
This facility
$6,414
Arizona average
$31,656
US average
$66,281
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Arizona and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Arizona average.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
↓ 4% · AZ 4.2This facility: 4.0, 4% below the AZ average of 4.2 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.8 short-stay measures: 2 better, 3 worse, 3 compared with US only
Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
77.3%
↑ 44% · US 53.7This facility: 77.3, 44% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
77.3%
↑ 44% · US 53.7This facility: 77.3, 44% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
63.5%
↑ 25% · US 50.6This facility: 63.5, 25% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
63.5%
↑ 25% · US 50.6This facility: 63.5, 25% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.6%
↓ 51% · AZ 1.1This facility: 0.6, 51% below the AZ average of 1.1 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.6%
↓ 51% · AZ 1.1This facility: 0.6, 51% below the AZ average of 1.1 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
76.0%
↓ 18% · AZ 92.6This facility: 76.0, 18% below the AZ average of 92.6 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
76.0%
↓ 18% · AZ 92.6This facility: 76.0, 18% below the AZ average of 92.6 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
72.4%
↓ 18% · AZ 87.9This facility: 72.4, 18% below the AZ average of 87.9 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
72.4%
↓ 18% · AZ 87.9This facility: 72.4, 18% below the AZ average of 87.9 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
17.5%
↓ 29% · AZ 24.6This facility: 17.5, 29% below the AZ average of 24.6 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
17.5%
↓ 29% · AZ 24.6This facility: 17.5, 29% below the AZ average of 24.6 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
12.2%
↑ 14% · AZ 10.7This facility: 12.2, 14% above the AZ average of 10.7 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
12.2%
↑ 14% · AZ 10.7This facility: 12.2, 14% above the AZ average of 10.7 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Life Care Center of Scottsdale’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 61 Arizona nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−12.7% operating margin
+0.2 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 7 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($0.0M) trims the net loss to −$0.7M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends more on payroll than most Arizona homes
70.2% payroll share of revenue
AZ average 63.3%Rank #12 / 61Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 12th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Arizona for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Arizona average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll fell $0.9M while revenue fell $1.3M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Arizona homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | AZ median | Compared with AZ homesRank in AZ | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $5.6M | −$1.3M | Trend 20172024 | AZ median $13.7M | Rank in AZ Rank #55 / 61Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 55th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Arizona for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Arizona average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 10% of homes | Below AZ median Higher net patient revenue than 10% of AZ homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $6.3M | −$1.5M | Trend 20172024 | AZ median $14.6M | Rank in AZ Rank #58 / 61Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 58th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Arizona for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Arizona homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 5% of homes | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$0.7M | +$0.2M | Trend 20172024 | AZ median −$0.0M | Rank in AZ Rank #38 / 61Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 38th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Arizona for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Arizona homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 38% of homes | Loss, narrowing Resident care lost money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −12.7% | +0.2 pts | Trend 20172024 | AZ median 0.0% | Rank in AZ Rank #44 / 61Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 44th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Arizona for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Arizona homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 28% of homes | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.0M | — | Trend — | AZ median $0.0M | Rank in AZ Rank #34 / 58Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 34th out of 58 nursing homes we track in Arizona for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Arizona homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 42% of homes | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$0.7M | +$0.2M | Trend — | AZ median $0.6M | Rank in AZ Rank #44 / 61Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 44th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Arizona for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Arizona homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 28% of homes | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends more of revenue on staff than most Arizona homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | AZ median | Compared with AZ homesRank in AZ | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $3.9M | −$0.9M | Trend 20172024 | AZ median $7.5M | Rank in AZ Rank #56 / 61Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 56th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Arizona for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Arizona average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 8% of homes | Below AZ median Higher payroll than 8% of AZ homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 70.2% | +0.8 pts | Trend 20172024 | AZ median 55.2% | Rank in AZ Rank #12 / 61Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 12th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Arizona for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Arizona average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 82% of homes | 6.9 pts over AZ average The AZ average is 63.3% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · AZ benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Arizona payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin AZ payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $9.2M | $9.6M | $11.1M | $9.3M | $7.9M | $9.0M | $6.9M | $5.6M |
| Operating expenses | $9.9M | $10.3M | $11.5M | $10.2M | $8.6M | $8.9M | $7.8M | $6.3M |
| Net patient income | −$0.7M | −$0.7M | −$0.4M | −$0.9M | −$0.7M | $0.1M | −$0.9M | −$0.7M |
| Operating margin | −8.1% | −6.8% | −3.4% | −10.1% | −9.0% | 0.8% | −12.9% | −12.7% |
| Net income | −$0.7M | −$0.6M | −$0.4M | −$0.0M | −$0.0M | $0.1M | −$0.9M | −$0.7M |
| Payroll costs | $6.5M | $6.7M | $7.5M | $6.3M | $5.2M | $5.4M | $4.8M | $3.9M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 70.6% | 69.2% | 67.1% | 67.8% | 65.8% | 60.5% | 69.4% | 70.2% |
| Beds | 132 | 132 | 132 | 132 | 132 | 132 | 132 | 132 |
| Gross revenue | $9.6M | $9.9M | $11.9M | $11.3M | $12.1M | $14.5M | $11.5M | $10.1M |
| Salaries | $5.6M | $5.7M | $6.4M | $5.3M | $4.4M | $4.7M | $4.1M | $3.4M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.9M | $0.9M | $1.0M | $1.0M | $0.8M | $0.7M | $0.7M | $0.5M |
| Contract labor | $0.2M | $0.2M | $0.2M | $0.2M | $0.2M | $0.2M | $0.2M | $0.2M |
| Other operating costs | $3.4M | $3.6M | $4.0M | $3.9M | $3.4M | $3.5M | $3.0M | $2.4M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $450 | $460 | $460 | $473 | $470 | $483 | $475 | $498 |
| Cost per day | $487 | $491 | $475 | $521 | $512 | $480 | $536 | $561 |
| Average length of stay | 15.0 days | 14.0 days | 14.5 days | 15.1 days | 14.4 days | 15.3 days | 15.0 days | 18.6 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Arriving
633 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
121 · 19%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
512 · 81%
Leaving
608 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
110 · 18%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
498 · 82%
Primarily short stays
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Places of interest near Life Care Center of Scottsdale
6.8 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Scottsdale's city center to Life Care Center of Scottsdale's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 0.64 miles to nearest hospital (HonorHealth Scottsdale Shea Medical Center)
Calculate Travel Distance to Life Care Center of Scottsdale
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Scottsdale
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the AZ Dept. of Health Services (ADHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
CCRC (Continuing Care Retirement Community):
A campus with multiple care levels so residents can age in place without moving.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Arizona average is: 63.3% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plaza Healthcare | NH SNF | Scottsdale (South Scottsdale) | 179
Facility
179
AZ AVG
102
Rank
#14 / 80 | A- |
74.0%
Facility
74.0%
AZ AVG
75.4%
Rank
#32 / 55 | -2% | 3.44
Facility
3.44
AZ AVG
4.08
Rank
#50 / 60 | +95% | -16% | $0
Facility
$0
AZ AVG
$31.7k
Rank
#1 / 61 | 7
Facility
7
AZ AVG
21.2
Rank
#9 / 61 | 2.3
Facility
2.3
AZ AVG
3.3
Rank
#14 / 61 | - | 132 | - |
59
Facility
59
AZ AVG
42
Rank
#18 / 82 | Plaza Hc Holding Company, LLC | $30.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$30.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
$15.9M
Rank
#5 / 61 | $22.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$22.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#3 / 61 | 74.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
74.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
63.3%
Rank
#9 / 61 | 035084 | ||||
| Life Care Center of Scottsdale | NH SNF | Scottsdale (Central Scottsdale) | 132
Facility
132
AZ AVG
102
Rank
#18 / 80 | B+ |
44.9%
Facility
44.9%
AZ AVG
75.4%
Rank
#52 / 55 | -40% | 3.66
Facility
3.66
AZ AVG
4.08
Rank
#32 / 60 | -46% | -10% | $6.4k
Facility
$6.4k
AZ AVG
$31.7k
Rank
#51 / 61 | 15
Facility
15
AZ AVG
21.2
Rank
#24 / 61 | 3.0
Facility
3.0
AZ AVG
3.3
Rank
#26 / 61 | 1 | 59 | - |
38
Facility
38
AZ AVG
42
Rank
#44 / 82 | Cove Associates, LLC | $5.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
$15.9M
Rank
#55 / 61 | $3.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$3.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#56 / 61 | 70.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
70.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
63.3%
Rank
#12 / 61 | 035143 | ||||
| Vi at Grayhawk | NH AL CCRC IL MC SNF | Scottsdale (Grayhawk) | 120
Facility
120
AZ AVG
102
Rank
#26 / 80 | A- | - | - | 4.93
Facility
4.93
AZ AVG
4.08
Rank
#12 / 60 | 0% | +21% | $0
Facility
$0
AZ AVG
$31.7k
Rank
#1 / 61 | 13
Facility
13
AZ AVG
21.2
Rank
#1 / 61 | 4.3
Facility
4.3
AZ AVG
3.3
Rank
#1 / 61 | - | 34 | A+ |
8
Facility
8
AZ AVG
42
Rank
#77 / 82 | Cc/Pdr-Scottsdale, L.l.c | $7.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
$15.9M
Rank
#52 / 61 | $6.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$6.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#38 / 61 | 86.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
86.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
63.3%
Rank
#7 / 61 | 035272 | ||||
| Vi at Silverstone | NH AL CCRC IL MC SNF | Scottsdale (North Scottsdale) | 64
Facility
64
AZ AVG
102
Rank
#58 / 80 | A- | - | - | 6.27
Facility
6.27
AZ AVG
4.08
Rank
#5 / 60 | +45% | +54% | $0
Facility
$0
AZ AVG
$31.7k
Rank
#1 / 61 | 16
Facility
16
AZ AVG
21.2
Rank
#27 / 61 | 5.3
Facility
5.3
AZ AVG
3.3
Rank
#47 / 61 | - | 21 | - |
43
Facility
43
AZ AVG
42
Rank
#36 / 82 | Cc/Pdr Silverstone, L.l.c | $5.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
$15.9M
Rank
#57 / 61 | $5.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#46 / 61 | 111.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
111.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
63.3%
Rank
#5 / 61 | 035281 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other AZ nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 4 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Arizona
Life Care Center of Scottsdale is located in Scottsdale, Arizona.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Arizona.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Life Care Center of Scottsdale
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 What neighborhood is Life Care Center of Scottsdale in?
Life Care Center of Scottsdale is in the Central Scottsdale neighborhood of Scottsdale.
02 Who is the owner of Life Care Center of Scottsdale?
Life Care Center of Scottsdale is legally operated by Cove Associates, LLC, and administered by Liviu Iliescu.
03 Is Life Care Center of Scottsdale in a walkable area?
Life Care Center of Scottsdale has a walk score of 38. Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
04 What is the license number of Life Care Center of Scottsdale?
According to AZ state health department records, Life Care Center of Scottsdale's license number is NCI-395.
05 When does Life Care Center of Scottsdale's license expire?
According to AZ state health department records, Life Care Center of Scottsdale's license expires on November 30, 2026.
06 What is the occupancy rate at Life Care Center of Scottsdale?
Life Care Center of Scottsdale's occupancy is 44.9%.
07 Are pets allowed at Life Care Center of Scottsdale?
No, Life Care Center of Scottsdale has a no-pet policy.
Updated on
