5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
VI at Grayhawk in Scottsdale, AZ, offers nursing home, assisted living, continuing care retirement community, independent living, memory care, and skilled nursing. Assisted living provides help with daily tasks while a resident keeps an apartment. Memory care provides a secured setting with supervision for someone at risk of wandering, while skilled nursing provides licensed nursing care on site around the clock.
Independent living provides private living with community services and no daily care. Having several care levels in one community can allow a resident’s needs to change over time without requiring a move elsewhere. With 36 beds, VI at Grayhawk is a smaller community where staff and residents can get to know each other.
The range of care settings may suit a resident whose support needs could grow over time, and the community may also fit someone living with dementia who needs a secured, supervised setting. Pets are allowed, so a resident may bring a pet when moving in. Payment options are Medicare and private pay.
Medicare covers shorter term skilled care after a hospital stay rather than long term residence, while private pay means a family pays directly. Total nurse staffing is 5 hours 11 minutes per resident per day, representing the daily nurse staffing time allocated per resident.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
This nursing home is ranked 10th out of 59 nursing homes we track in Arizona for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 11mStandout metric: Registered nurse (RN) is +95% above Arizona average
1 of 6 metrics below Arizona average
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 11 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
11 staff · 10.4-hour shifts
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 18 total: 10 of the facility's own employees and 8 agency contractors.
18 staff · 9.2-hour shifts
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 63 total: 39 of the facility's own employees and 24 agency contractors.
63 staff · 8.2-hour shifts
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
117
68 employees · 49 contractors · 28 on an average day
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.8 h
↓ 8% · AZ 8.5 hThis facility: 7.8 h, 8% below the Arizona average of 8.5 h (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
20,194 staff hours this quarter
See full Arizona ranking →84% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Arizona average: 94.4% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (24), Licensed Practical Nurse (8), Speech Language Pathologist (5), Respiratory Therapy Technician (3), Qualified Social Worker (3), Physical Therapy Aide (2), Physical Therapy Assistant (2), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1), Medical Director (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
84
Rank #44 / 80Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 44th out of 80 nursing homes we track in Arizona for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Arizona facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #14 / 53Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 14th out of 53 nursing homes we track in Arizona for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Arizona facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #77 / 82Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 77th out of 82 nursing homes we track in Arizona for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Arizona facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #53 / 56Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 53rd out of 56 nursing homes we track in Arizona for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Arizona average, with its Statewide rank out of 56. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Based on 33 residents and 84 beds. Source: state inspection report (Nov 2021)
Lower than the Arizona average: 73.3%
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
Vi at Grayhawk is administered by Melanie Bartola.
Sourced directly from the team at Vi at Grayhawk.This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ. Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file — covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification surveys.
In Arizona, the Department of Health Services, Bureau of Long Term Care Licensing performs regular onsite inspections and investigates complaints for all licensed residential and nursing facilities.
The figures below cover inspections recorded since January 17, 2025.
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Arizona state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Deficiencies
| This Facility | AZ Average | vs. AZ Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 7 | 10.0 | This facility has 30% fewer total deficiencies than a typical Arizona nursing home (7 vs. AZ avg 10).↓ 30% better |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
Average deficiencies per inspection.
| 1.2 | 2.3 | This facility has 48% fewer deficiencies per inspection than a typical Arizona nursing home (1.2 vs. AZ avg 2.3).↓ 48% better |
|
Enforcement actions
Formal penalties or interventions imposed by Arizona regulators — directed plans of correction, civil monetary penalties, denial of payment, or appointment of temporary management.
| 0 | 0.9 | This facility has 100% fewer enforcement actions than a typical Arizona nursing home (0 vs. AZ avg 0.9).↓ 100% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | AZ Average | vs. AZ Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 6 | 5.0 | This facility has had 20% more total inspections than the Arizona average (6 vs. AZ avg 5). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 20% more |
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Arizona avg 21.7 (91% better than Arizona average)Arizona avg 3.49 (71% better than Arizona average)
100% corrected
2 of 2 citations corrected Arizona avg 0.1 (100% better than Arizona average)Arizona avg 0.5 (100% better than Arizona average)Arizona avg 21 (90% better than Arizona average)Arizona avg 0.1 (100% better than Arizona average)
Corrected
Corrected
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
1 of 2 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 1 of 2 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials were reported in the last 3 years.
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
A composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and activities of daily living decline.
5.2
24% better than Arizona averageArizona average: 6.8
A composite score based on activities of daily living decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence.
10.0
33% better than Arizona averageArizona average: 14.9
CMS star rating based on long-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = significantly above average, 1 star = significantly below average.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
10.0%
6% better than Arizona averageArizona average: 10.7%
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
3.2%
75% better than Arizona averageArizona average: 12.8%
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
16.8%
19% better than Arizona averageArizona average: 20.6%
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.4%
10% worse than Arizona averageArizona average: 2.1%
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.6%
16% better than Arizona averageArizona average: 4.4%
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.7%
205% worse than Arizona averageArizona average: 1.2%
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.9%
30% worse than Arizona averageArizona average: 5.3%
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.7%
5% better than Arizona averageArizona average: 3.9%
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.2%
15% worse than Arizona averageArizona average: 10.6%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
In line with Arizona averageArizona average: 96.9%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.0%
In line with Arizona averageArizona average: 94.6%
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.60
55% worse than Arizona averageArizona average: 1.68
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.54
64% better than Arizona averageArizona average: 1.48
CMS star rating based on short-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = much above average, 1 star = much below average.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.7%
9% better than Arizona averageArizona average: 91.8%
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
100% better than Arizona averageArizona average: 1.2%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
99.0%
13% better than Arizona averageArizona average: 87.3%
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
18.8%
24% better than Arizona averageArizona average: 24.6%
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
12.4%
16% worse than Arizona averageArizona average: 10.7%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.7%
8% better than Arizona averageArizona average: 0.8%
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
67.2%
25% better than Arizona averageArizona average: 53.7%
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
64.5%
28% better than Arizona averageArizona average: 50.6%
Quality measures are calculated from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. For most measures, lower percentages indicate better care quality.
80% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
20% of new residents, often for short stays.
Historical financial and operational data for Vi at Grayhawk from 2011–2024, based on CMS SNF Cost Reports. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Key figures below are for fiscal year ending in 12/2024.
Based on CMS SNF Cost Report for fiscal year ending in 12/2024.
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Money the home earns outside of resident care — such as investments, grants, rentals and other non-operating sources (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It is tracked separately from net patient revenue: it is not part of that figure, and it is not included in net patient income.
Staff salaries plus wage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement — from the home's own accounting records (CMS cost report, Worksheet A). Contract or agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs.
Rank #39 / 58Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 39th out of 58 nursing homes we track in Arizona. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Arizona average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll as a share of revenue: staff salaries and wage-related benefits divided by net patient revenue. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay.
Rank #6 / 58Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 6th out of 58 nursing homes we track in Arizona. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Arizona average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Everything it costs to run the home apart from payroll — food, utilities, supplies, maintenance, contract labor and administration. Calculated as total operating expense minus payroll (staff salaries and wage-related benefits).
The home's total operating expense for the year — all the costs of running it, salaries included (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3).
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Most new residents arrive under Medicare (80% of admissions), and a typical Medicare stay runs around 24 days.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
7501 E Thompson Peak Pkwy, Scottsdale, AZ 85255 — 0.28 miles to nearest hospital (HonorHealth Scottsdale Thompson Peak Medical Center)
Add your location
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the AZ Dept. of Health Services (ADHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
CCRC (Continuing Care Retirement Community):
A campus with multiple care levels so residents can age in place without moving.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Arizona average is: 64.5% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plaza Healthcare | NH SNF | Scottsdale (South Scottsdale) | 179
Facility
179
AZ AVG
100
Rank
#13 / 80 |
76.8%
Facility
76.8%
AZ AVG
73.3%
Rank
#29 / 56 | +5% | 3.44
Facility
3.44
AZ AVG
3.97
Rank
#42 / 59 | +109% | -13% | $0
Facility
$0
AZ AVG
$31.1k
Rank
#1 / 61 | 7
Facility
7
AZ AVG
21.7
Rank
#9 / 61 | 2.3
Facility
2.3
AZ AVG
3.5
Rank
#14 / 61 | - | 137 | - |
59
Facility
59
AZ AVG
42
Rank
#18 / 82 | Plaza Hc Holding Company, LLC | $30.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$30.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
$15.3M
Rank
#3 / 58 | $22.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$22.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
$8.6M
Rank
#3 / 58 | 74.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
74.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
64.5%
Rank
#18 / 58 | 35084 | ||||
| Life Care Center of Scottsdale | NH SNF | Scottsdale (Central Scottsdale) | 132
Facility
132
AZ AVG
100
Rank
#18 / 80 |
34.1%
Facility
34.1%
AZ AVG
73.3%
Rank
#56 / 56 | -53% | 3.95
Facility
3.95
AZ AVG
3.97
Rank
#25 / 59 | -39% | 0% | $6.4k
Facility
$6.4k
AZ AVG
$31.1k
Rank
#51 / 61 | 15
Facility
15
AZ AVG
21.7
Rank
#24 / 61 | 3.0
Facility
3.0
AZ AVG
3.5
Rank
#26 / 61 | 1 | 45 | - |
38
Facility
38
AZ AVG
42
Rank
#44 / 82 | Cove Associates, LLC | $5.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
$15.3M
Rank
#52 / 58 | $3.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$3.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
$8.6M
Rank
#50 / 58 | 70.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
70.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
64.5%
Rank
#10 / 58 | 35143 | ||||
| Vi at Grayhawk | NH AL CCRC IL MC SNF | Scottsdale (Grayhawk) | 84
Facility
84
AZ AVG
100
Rank
#44 / 80 |
39.3%
Facility
39.3%
AZ AVG
73.3%
Rank
#53 / 56 | -46% | 5.19
Facility
5.19
AZ AVG
3.97
Rank
#10 / 59 | -6% | +31% | $0
Facility
$0
AZ AVG
$31.1k
Rank
#1 / 61 | 2
Facility
2
AZ AVG
21.7
Rank
#1 / 61 | 1.0
Facility
1.0
AZ AVG
3.5
Rank
#1 / 61 | - | 33 | A+ |
8
Facility
8
AZ AVG
42
Rank
#77 / 82 | Cc/Pdr-Scottsdale, L.l.c | $7.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
$15.3M
Rank
#51 / 58 | $6.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$6.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
$8.6M
Rank
#39 / 58 | 86.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
86.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
64.5%
Rank
#6 / 58 | 35272 | ||||
| Vi at Silverstone | NH AL CCRC IL MC SNF | Scottsdale (North Scottsdale) | 40
Facility
40
AZ AVG
100
Rank
#62 / 80 | - | - | 6.35
Facility
6.35
AZ AVG
3.97
Rank
#4 / 59 | +84% | +60% | $0
Facility
$0
AZ AVG
$31.1k
Rank
#1 / 61 | 17
Facility
17
AZ AVG
21.7
Rank
#27 / 61 | 4.3
Facility
4.3
AZ AVG
3.5
Rank
#47 / 61 | - | 20 | - |
43
Facility
43
AZ AVG
42
Rank
#36 / 82 | Cc/Pdr Silverstone, L.l.c | $5.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
$15.3M
Rank
#54 / 58 | $5.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
$8.6M
Rank
#43 / 58 | 111.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
111.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
64.5%
Rank
#4 / 58 | 35281 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other AZ nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 4 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Vi at Grayhawk is located in Scottsdale, Arizona.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Arizona.
Vi at Grayhawk is in the Grayhawk neighborhood of Scottsdale.
Vi at Grayhawk is legally operated by Cc/Pdr-Scottsdale, L.l.c., and administered by Melanie Bartola.
Vi at Grayhawk has a walk score of 8. Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
According to AZ state health department records, Vi at Grayhawk's license number is AL2627C.
Vi at Grayhawk's occupancy is 39.3%.
Vi at Grayhawk has been operating for approximately 28 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
Yes, Vi at Grayhawk allows residents to bring their pets.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
