ALM's inspection grade is 92 / 100, an A- — 10 points above the Utah average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
ALM's inspection grade is 92 / 100, an A- — 10 points above the Utah average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Tucked in the tranquil neighborhood of North Logan, UT, Maple Springs of North Logan is dedicated to improving seniors’ well-being with assisted living, memory care, skilled nursing, and rehabilitation services. Seniors and families can keep their peace of mind with a team of responsive and highly trained professionals caring for their needs and aspirations 24/7. Moreover, the community promotes a bright and welcoming environment for seniors to flourish and live their lives to the fullest.
Residents do not run out of things to do with a lot of enriching activities and engaging programs that aim to keep them happy and socially connected. Here, delectable and healthy meals are served to satisfy nutritional needs and tastes. Amenities include a movie theater, onsite salon services, a library, and an ice cream parlor.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
This nursing home is ranked 2nd out of 68 nursing homes we track in Utah for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 46mStandout metric: Physical therapist is +110% above Utah average
0 of 6 metrics below Utah average
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 17 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
17 staff · 9.1-hour shifts
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 14 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
14 staff · 7.8-hour shifts
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 57 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
57 staff · 6.2-hour shifts
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
111
111 employees · 0 contractors · 40 on an average day
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
6.6 h
↓ 16% · UT 7.9 hThis facility: 6.6 h, 16% below the Utah average of 7.9 h (among Utah facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
24,146 staff hours this quarter
See full Utah ranking →100% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Utah average: 94.4% · No agency contractors this quarter
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
80
Rank #44 / 72Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 44th out of 72 nursing homes we track in Utah for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Utah facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
An established community with some operational experience and growing routines. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #60 / 63Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 60th out of 63 nursing homes we track in Utah for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Utah facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #62 / 81Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 62nd out of 81 nursing homes we track in Utah for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Utah facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Aug 2026)
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
10 points above the Utah average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100)
Category breakdown
62 severity-weighted points (22 deficiencies) · 17% lower than the typical CMS-certified UT facility (median: 75)
1 enforcement action · about the same as the typical CMS-certified UT facility (median: 1) · $8,278 in fines
33 days to fix issues · faster than the typical CMS-certified UT facility (median: 40)
100% corrected
22 of 22 citations corrected Latest inspection: Feb 25, 2026 · 5 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Infection Control, 4 of 22 citations · 9 categories in total
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
19 of 22 citations resulted from standard inspections; 1 of 22 resulted from complaint investigations; and 2 of 22 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection ReportsFederal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database (Data as of Aug 2026)
81% lower than Utah averageUtah average: $44K
38% fewer fines than Utah averageUtah average: 1.6
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
100% fewer payment denials than Utah averageUtah average: 0.3
Penalties imposed by CMS in the past 3 years.
1 penalty in the past 3 years
Dec 8, 2025 · $8K
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
Dec 8, 2025Last updated: Aug 2026
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Utah average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 25% · UT 4.0This facility: 5.0, 25% above the UT average of 4.0 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
2
/ 5
Below average
↓ 38% · UT 3.3This facility: 2.0, 38% below the UT average of 3.3 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
3.8
Score · lower is better
↓ 47% · UT 7.1This facility: 3.8, 47% below the UT average of 7.1 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
19.6
Score · lower is better
↑ 22% · UT 16.0This facility: 19.6, 22% above the UT average of 16.0 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.10 long-stay measures: 5 better, 3 worse, 2 near UT average
8 short-stay measures: 1 better, 2 worse, 2 near UT average, 3 compared with US only
People who live at the home · 10 measures
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.4%
↓ 52% · UT 11.3This facility: 5.4, 52% below the UT average of 11.3 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
33.8%
↑ 57% · UT 21.5This facility: 33.8, 57% above the UT average of 21.5 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.6%
↓ 10% · UT 1.8This facility: 1.6, 10% below the UT average of 1.8 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
↓ 100% · UT 2.5This facility: 0.0, 100% below the UT average of 2.5 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.0%
↓ 23% · UT 3.9This facility: 3.0, 23% below the UT average of 3.9 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.8%
↑ 103% · UT 3.4This facility: 6.8, 103% above the UT average of 3.4 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.7%
↓ 66% · UT 16.5This facility: 5.7, 66% below the UT average of 16.5 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
33.3%
↑ 135% · UT 14.2This facility: 33.3, 135% above the UT average of 14.2 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 3% · UT 97.4This facility: 100.0, 3% above the UT average of 97.4 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 2% · UT 98.0This facility: 100.0, 2% above the UT average of 98.0 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
31.4%
↓ 41% · US 53.7This facility: 31.4, 41% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
65.5%
↑ 30% · US 50.6This facility: 65.5, 30% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
2.2%
↑ 187% · US 0.8This facility: 2.2, 187% above the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.6%
↑ 191% · UT 0.9This facility: 2.6, 191% above the UT average of 0.9 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
95.6%
↑ 2% · UT 93.8This facility: 95.6, 2% above the UT average of 93.8 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
90.3%
↓ 1% · UT 91.0This facility: 90.3, 1% below the UT average of 91.0 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
24.3%
↑ 40% · UT 17.4This facility: 24.3, 40% above the UT average of 17.4 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
11.1%
↓ 6% · UT 11.8This facility: 11.1, 6% below the UT average of 11.8 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
54% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
46% of new residents, often for short stays.
Historical financial and operational data for Maple Springs of North Logan from 2018–2024, based on CMS SNF Cost Reports. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Key figures below are for fiscal year ending in 12/2024.
Based on CMS SNF Cost Report for fiscal year ending in 12/2024.
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Money the home earns outside of resident care — such as investments, grants, rentals and other non-operating sources (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It is tracked separately from net patient revenue: it is not part of that figure, and it is not included in net patient income.
Staff salaries plus wage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement — from the home's own accounting records (CMS cost report, Worksheet A). Contract or agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs.
Rank #29 / 70Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 29th out of 70 nursing homes we track in Utah. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Utah average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll as a share of revenue: staff salaries and wage-related benefits divided by net patient revenue. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay.
Rank #15 / 68Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 15th out of 68 nursing homes we track in Utah. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Utah average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Everything it costs to run the home apart from payroll — food, utilities, supplies, maintenance, contract labor and administration. Calculated as total operating expense minus payroll (staff salaries and wage-related benefits).
The home's total operating expense for the year — all the costs of running it, salaries included (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3).
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Most new residents arrive under Medicare (54% of admissions), and a typical Medicare stay runs around 1 months.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
1.2 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from North Logan's city center to Maple Springs of North Logan's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Add your location
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the UT Dept. of Health & Human Services (DHHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
HC (Home Care):
Professional care delivered in the person's own home, from companionship to skilled nursing.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Utah average is: 49.5% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pointe Meadows Health and Rehabilitation | NH MC SNF | Lehi | 99
Facility
99
UT AVG
94
Rank
#33 / 72 | A- |
85.4%
Facility
85.4%
UT AVG
71.4%
Rank
#20 / 58 | +20% | 3.64
Facility
3.64
UT AVG
3.86
Rank
#23 / 68 | -6% | -6% | $0
Facility
$0
UT AVG
$43.9k
Rank
#1 / 74 | 22
Facility
22
UT AVG
27.3
Rank
#32 / 73 | 7.3
Facility
7.3
UT AVG
7.8
Rank
#40 / 73 | - | 85 | - |
70
Facility
70
UT AVG
52
Rank
#22 / 81 | Pointe Meadow Healthcare Inc | $13.2MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$13.2MFiscal year ending 06/2025
UT AVG
$9.3M
Rank
#14 / 70 | $7.5MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$7.5MFiscal year ending 06/2025
UT AVG
$4.5M
Rank
#6 / 70 | 56.7%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
56.7%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
UT AVG
49.5%
Rank
#21 / 68 | 465188 | ||||
| Pinnacle Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | NH MC SNF | North Price | 100
Facility
100
UT AVG
94
Rank
#29 / 72 | A- |
56.0%
Facility
56.0%
UT AVG
71.4%
Rank
#46 / 58 | -22% | 3.38
Facility
3.38
UT AVG
3.86
Rank
#37 / 68 | -10% | -13% | $0
Facility
$0
UT AVG
$43.9k
Rank
#1 / 74 | 15
Facility
15
UT AVG
27.3
Rank
#13 / 73 | 5.0
Facility
5.0
UT AVG
7.8
Rank
#21 / 73 | - | 56 | - |
71
Facility
71
UT AVG
52
Rank
#18 / 81 | Price Healthcare, Inc | $8.7MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$8.7MFiscal year ending 06/2025
UT AVG
$9.3M
Rank
#34 / 70 | $4.2MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$4.2MFiscal year ending 06/2025
UT AVG
$4.5M
Rank
#36 / 70 | 47.7%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
47.7%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
UT AVG
49.5%
Rank
#41 / 68 | 465098 | ||||
| Cedar Health and Rehabilitation | NH MC SNF | Cedar City | 120
Facility
120
UT AVG
94
Rank
#14 / 72 | B+ |
59.9%
Facility
59.9%
UT AVG
71.4%
Rank
#43 / 58 | -16% | 4.04
Facility
4.04
UT AVG
3.86
Rank
#13 / 68 | -59% | +4% | $0
Facility
$0
UT AVG
$43.9k
Rank
#1 / 74 | 20
Facility
20
UT AVG
27.3
Rank
#23 / 73 | 6.7
Facility
6.7
UT AVG
7.8
Rank
#33 / 73 | 1 | 72 | - |
76
Facility
76
UT AVG
52
Rank
#8 / 81 | Cedar City Healthcare, Inc | $10.1MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$10.1MFiscal year ending 06/2025
UT AVG
$9.3M
Rank
#29 / 70 | $5.5MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$5.5MFiscal year ending 06/2025
UT AVG
$4.5M
Rank
#24 / 70 | 54.4%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
54.4%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
UT AVG
49.5%
Rank
#22 / 68 | 465143 | ||||
| Rocky Mountain Care – Hunter Hollow | NH HC HOS SNF | West Valley City | 124
Facility
124
UT AVG
94
Rank
#10 / 72 | C+ |
88.6%
Facility
88.6%
UT AVG
71.4%
Rank
#13 / 58 | +24% | 3.03
Facility
3.03
UT AVG
3.86
Rank
#59 / 68 | +25% | -21% | $20.3k
Facility
$20.3k
UT AVG
$43.9k
Rank
#50 / 74 | 26
Facility
26
UT AVG
27.3
Rank
#45 / 73 | 3.7
Facility
3.7
UT AVG
7.8
Rank
#8 / 73 | 6 | 110 | - |
67
Facility
67
UT AVG
52
Rank
#28 / 81 | Bcvv, Inc | $14.5MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$14.5MFiscal year ending 06/2025
UT AVG
$9.3M
Rank
#6 / 70 | $7.4MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$7.4MFiscal year ending 06/2025
UT AVG
$4.5M
Rank
#5 / 70 | 51.1%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
51.1%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
UT AVG
49.5%
Rank
#33 / 68 | 465075 | ||||
| Maple Springs of North Logan | NH AL MC RC SNF | North Logan | 80
Facility
80
UT AVG
94
Rank
#44 / 72 | A- | - | - | 5.76
Facility
5.76
UT AVG
3.86
Rank
#2 / 68 | -9% | +49% | $8.3k
Facility
$8.3k
UT AVG
$43.9k
Rank
#38 / 74 | 22
Facility
22
UT AVG
27.3
Rank
#32 / 73 | 5.5
Facility
5.5
UT AVG
7.8
Rank
#26 / 73 | 1 | 37 | - |
33
Facility
33
UT AVG
52
Rank
#62 / 81 | - | $9.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$9.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
UT AVG
$9.3M
Rank
#36 / 70 | $5.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
UT AVG
$4.5M
Rank
#29 / 70 | 53.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
53.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
UT AVG
49.5%
Rank
#15 / 68 | 465186 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other UT nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Maple Springs of North Logan has a walk score of 33. Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Maple Springs of North Logan's occupancy is 58.4%.
Maple Springs of North Logan has been operating for approximately 9 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
No, Maple Springs of North Logan has a no-pet policy.
Maple Springs of North Logan received a 3-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
Maple Springs of North Logan has 80 beds.
Maple Springs of North Logan has no reported deficiencies according to records from Utah Dept. of Health and Human Services (DHHS).
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
