Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
195
128 employees · 67 contractors · 65 on an average day Marquis Springfield
Nursing Home · Springfield, OR
ALM Inspection Grade
B+
ALM's inspection grade is 87 / 100, a B+ — 3 points above the Oregon average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 87 / 100, a B+ — 3 points above the Oregon average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Marquis Springfield
Nursing Home · Springfield, OR
ALM Inspection Grade
B+
ALM's inspection grade is 87 / 100, a B+ — 3 points above the Oregon average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 87 / 100, a B+ — 3 points above the Oregon average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Marquis Springfield accepts Medicaid, Medicare, and private pay.
Marquis Springfield is a nursing home in Springfield, Oregon, where residents receive nursing care and daily support within the community. The setting may suit a resident who needs ongoing nursing care and assistance with daily needs.
Marquis Springfield accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay. Medicare may help cover short-term skilled care after a hospital stay, while Medicaid may assist when personal savings do not cover a long stay. Private pay uses personal funds.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 28th out of 77 nursing homes we track in Oregon for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 24m
This nursing home is ranked 28th out of 77 nursing homes we track in Oregon for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 24mStandout metric: LPN / LVN is +18% above Oregon average
4 of 6 metrics below Oregon average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 22 total: 6 of the facility's own employees and 16 agency contractors.
22 staff · 8.2-hour shifts
45m
↓ 8% · OR 49mThis facility: 45m per resident per day, 8% below the Oregon average of 49m (among Oregon facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 22 total: 6 of the facility's own employees and 16 agency contractors.
22 staff · 8.2-hour shiftsUS average: 42m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 42m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 33 total: 22 of the facility's own employees and 11 agency contractors.
33 staff · 7.7-hour shifts
1h 7m
↑ 18% · OR 57mThis facility: 1h 7m per resident per day, 18% above the Oregon average of 57m (among Oregon facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 33 total: 22 of the facility's own employees and 11 agency contractors.
33 staff · 7.7-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 95 total: 71 of the facility's own employees and 24 agency contractors.
95 staff · 7.2-hour shifts
3h 32m
↓ 5% · OR 3h 43mThis facility: 3h 32m per resident per day, 5% below the Oregon average of 3h 43m (among Oregon facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 95 total: 71 of the facility's own employees and 24 agency contractors.
95 staff · 7.2-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 26m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
6m
↑ 9% · OR 6mThis facility: 6m per resident per day, 9% above the Oregon average of 6m (among Oregon facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
4h 48m
↓ 2% · OR 4h 53mThis facility: 4h 48m per resident per day, 2% below the Oregon average of 4h 53m (among Oregon facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 32m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 32m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
24m
↓ 22% · OR 31mThis facility: 24m per resident per day, 22% below the Oregon average of 31m (among Oregon facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
195
128 employees · 67 contractors · 65 on an average day
195 total staff / 74 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
2.64 : 1
↑ 3% · OR 2.57This facility: 2.64 staff per resident, 3% above the Oregon average of 2.57 (among Oregon facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
195 staff ÷ 74 residents
See full Oregon ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.4 h
↓ 5% · OR 7.8 hThis facility: 7.4 h, 5% below the Oregon average of 7.8 h (among Oregon facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
43,785 staff hours this quarter
See full Oregon ranking →87.8% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Oregon average: 90.3% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (24), Registered Nurse (16), Licensed Practical Nurse (11), Physical Therapy Assistant (4), Respiratory Therapy Technician (3), Speech Language Pathologist (3), Medical Director (2), Physical Therapy Aide (2), Qualified Social Worker (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
136
Rank #5 / 91Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 5th out of 91 nursing homes we track in Oregon for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Oregon facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
136
Rank #5 / 91Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 5th out of 91 nursing homes we track in Oregon for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Oregon facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
Walk Score
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #62 / 95Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 62nd out of 95 nursing homes we track in Oregon for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Oregon facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #62 / 95Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 62nd out of 95 nursing homes we track in Oregon for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Oregon facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
56
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #59 / 70Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 59th out of 70 nursing homes we track in Oregon for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Oregon average, with its Statewide rank out of 70. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #59 / 70Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 59th out of 70 nursing homes we track in Oregon for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Oregon average, with its Statewide rank out of 70. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
56.5%
This home usually has availability
Based on residents per day and 136 beds.
Lower than the Oregon average: 72.7%
Residents per day (avg)
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
77
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
51
days
About This Community
Facility TypeNursing Facility
StatusActive
CountyLane
Marquis Springfield is administered by Kasandra Mills.
Owner NameMarquis Companies I, Inc.
Total
136 units
Total beds
136 units
Resident Council
Fax(541) 736-2800
Pets not allowed
Smoking not allowed
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
87 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
3 points above the Oregon average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Typical
66 severity-weighted points (33 deficiencies) · 8% lower than the typical CMS-certified OR facility (median: 72)
Enforcement
Strong
No fines on record · 0 enforcement actions
Persistence
Concern
58 days to fix issues · slower than the typical CMS-certified OR facility (median: 37)
Total health inspections
4
↓ 23% · OR 5.2This facility: 4, 23% below the Oregon average of 5.2 (among Oregon facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
33
Rank #40 / 78Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 40th out of 78 nursing homes we track in Oregon for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Oregon State average, with a ranking across all 78 OR facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 2% · OR 33.7This facility: 33, 2% below the Oregon average of 33.7 (among Oregon facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
8.25
Rank #56 / 78Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 56th out of 78 nursing homes we track in Oregon for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Oregon mean across 78 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 27% · OR 6.49This facility: 8.25, 27% above the Oregon average of 6.49 (among Oregon facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
33 of 33 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · OR 0.4This facility: 0, 100% below the Oregon average of 0.4 (among Oregon facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · OR 1This facility: 0, 100% below the Oregon average of 1 (among Oregon facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
33
↑ 3% · OR 32.1This facility: 33, 3% above the Oregon average of 32.1 (among Oregon facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · OR 0.3This facility: 0, 100% below the Oregon average of 0.3 (among Oregon facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Jan 05, 2026 · 13 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 13 of 33 citations · 8 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Jan 05, 2026
13 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Dec 05, 2024
2 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Aug 02, 2024
10 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 07, 2023
8 citations
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 33 citations
Quality of Life & Care
13 deficiencies (39%)
Resident Rights
7 deficiencies (21%)
Pharmacy Services
5 deficiencies (15%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
3 deficiencies (9%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
2 deficiencies (6%)
Infection Control
1 deficiency (3%)
Administration
1 deficiency (3%)
Environmental
1 deficiency (3%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
21 of 33 citations resulted from standard inspections; 2 of 33 resulted from complaint investigations; and 10 of 33 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Oct 2023.
Total fines
$0
OR avg $51KOregon average: $51,286. Average among the 64 Oregon facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
OR avg 1.53Oregon average: 1.53. Average among the 64 Oregon facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
OR avg 0.09Oregon average: 0.09. Average among the 64 Oregon facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Oregon average.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
12.5
Score · lower is better
↑ 44% · OR 8.7This facility: 12.5, 44% above the OR average of 8.7 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
23.3
Score · lower is better
↑ 30% · OR 17.9This facility: 23.3, 30% above the OR average of 17.9 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 5 better, 5 worse, 1 near OR average
3 short-stay measures: 3 better
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
16.9%
↑ 19% · OR 14.2This facility: 16.9, 19% above the OR average of 14.2 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
16.9%
↑ 19% · OR 14.2This facility: 16.9, 19% above the OR average of 14.2 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
25.2%
↑ 37% · OR 18.5This facility: 25.2, 37% above the OR average of 18.5 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
25.2%
↑ 37% · OR 18.5This facility: 25.2, 37% above the OR average of 18.5 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
27.8%
↑ 33% · OR 20.9This facility: 27.8, 33% above the OR average of 20.9 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
27.8%
↑ 33% · OR 20.9This facility: 27.8, 33% above the OR average of 20.9 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.0%
↓ 51% · OR 2.0This facility: 1.0, 51% below the OR average of 2.0 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.0%
↓ 51% · OR 2.0This facility: 1.0, 51% below the OR average of 2.0 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.5%
↓ 38% · OR 2.4This facility: 1.5, 38% below the OR average of 2.4 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.5%
↓ 38% · OR 2.4This facility: 1.5, 38% below the OR average of 2.4 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
12.1%
↑ 114% · OR 5.6This facility: 12.1, 114% above the OR average of 5.6 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
12.1%
↑ 114% · OR 5.6This facility: 12.1, 114% above the OR average of 5.6 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.9%
↑ 52% · OR 4.6This facility: 6.9, 52% above the OR average of 4.6 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.9%
↑ 52% · OR 4.6This facility: 6.9, 52% above the OR average of 4.6 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.5%
↓ 69% · OR 4.9This facility: 1.5, 69% below the OR average of 4.9 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.5%
↓ 69% · OR 4.9This facility: 1.5, 69% below the OR average of 4.9 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.3%
↓ 14% · OR 14.4This facility: 12.3, 14% below the OR average of 14.4 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.3%
↓ 14% · OR 14.4This facility: 12.3, 14% below the OR average of 14.4 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 5% · OR 95.3This facility: 100.0, 5% above the OR average of 95.3 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 5% · OR 95.3This facility: 100.0, 5% above the OR average of 95.3 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.7%
↑ 1% · OR 94.0This facility: 94.7, 1% above the OR average of 94.0 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.7%
↑ 1% · OR 94.0This facility: 94.7, 1% above the OR average of 94.0 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 3 measures
Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.0%
↓ 28% · OR 1.4This facility: 1.0, 28% below the OR average of 1.4 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.0%
↓ 28% · OR 1.4This facility: 1.0, 28% below the OR average of 1.4 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
90.7%
↑ 6% · OR 85.7This facility: 90.7, 6% above the OR average of 85.7 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
90.7%
↑ 6% · OR 85.7This facility: 90.7, 6% above the OR average of 85.7 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
85.6%
↑ 6% · OR 80.9This facility: 85.6, 6% above the OR average of 80.9 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
85.6%
↑ 6% · OR 80.9This facility: 85.6, 6% above the OR average of 80.9 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Marquis Springfield’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 73 Oregon nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Breaking even on care
2.0% operating margin
+2.1 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 4 of the last 8 reported years. Net income $0.6M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends more on payroll than most Oregon homes
57.1% payroll share of revenue
OR average 53.4%Rank #7 / 73Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 7th out of 73 nursing homes we track in Oregon for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Oregon average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $1.1M while revenue rose $0.6M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Oregon homes.
Revenue & profit
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | OR median | Compared with OR homesRank in OR | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $16.7M | +$0.6M | Trend 20172024 | OR median $11.9M | Rank in OR Rank #11 / 73Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 11th out of 73 nursing homes we track in Oregon for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Oregon average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 86% of homes | Above OR median Higher net patient revenue than 86% of OR homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $16.4M | +$0.2M | Trend 20172024 | OR median $11.9M | Rank in OR Rank #13 / 73Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 13th out of 73 nursing homes we track in Oregon for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Oregon homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 83% of homes | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $0.3M | +$0.4M | Trend 20172024 | OR median $0.7M | Rank in OR Rank #48 / 73Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 48th out of 73 nursing homes we track in Oregon for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Oregon homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 35% of homes | Profit, growing Resident care made money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 2.0% | +2.1 pts | Trend 20172024 | OR median 7.0% | Rank in OR Rank #53 / 73Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 53rd out of 73 nursing homes we track in Oregon for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Oregon homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 28% of homes | Thin margin A margin from 0% to 5% of revenue leaves little room for unexpected costs. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.2M | — | Trend — | OR median $0.1M | Rank in OR Rank #27 / 56Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 27th out of 56 nursing homes we track in Oregon for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Oregon homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 53% of homes | Adds to profit Income from outside resident care, on top of the profit from care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $0.6M | +$0.3M | Trend — | OR median $1.0M | Rank in OR Rank #53 / 73Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 53rd out of 73 nursing homes we track in Oregon for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Oregon homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 28% of homes | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends more of revenue on staff than most Oregon homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | OR median | Compared with OR homesRank in OR | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $9.5M | +$1.1M | Trend 20172024 | OR median $6.2M | Rank in OR Rank #9 / 73Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 9th out of 73 nursing homes we track in Oregon for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Oregon average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 89% of homes | Above OR median Higher payroll than 89% of OR homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 57.1% | +4.6 pts | Trend 20172024 | OR median 49.1% | Rank in OR Rank #7 / 73Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 7th out of 73 nursing homes we track in Oregon for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Oregon average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 92% of homes | 3.7 pts over OR average The OR average is 53.4% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · OR benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Oregon payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin OR payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $13.7M | $14.1M | $13.6M | $12.1M | $13.4M | $14.8M | $16.1M | $16.7M |
| Operating expenses | $13.1M | $13.7M | $13.2M | $12.6M | $13.8M | $15.4M | $16.1M | $16.4M |
| Net patient income | $0.6M | $0.4M | $0.4M | −$0.5M | −$0.4M | −$0.5M | −$0.0M | $0.3M |
| Operating margin | 4.5% | 3.1% | 2.7% | −3.8% | −3.3% | −3.6% | −0.1% | 2.0% |
| Net income | $0.8M | $0.6M | $0.5M | $0.9M | $0.6M | $0.2M | $0.3M | $0.6M |
| Payroll costs | $6.3M | $6.7M | $6.7M | $6.5M | $7.1M | $7.3M | $8.5M | $9.5M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 45.9% | 47.7% | 49.1% | 54.1% | 52.9% | 49.0% | 52.5% | 57.1% |
| Beds | 136 | 136 | 136 | 136 | 136 | 136 | 136 | 136 |
| Gross revenue | $28.2M | $29.3M | $26.4M | $19.4M | $21.8M | $22.4M | $24.3M | $23.8M |
| Salaries | $5.4M | $5.6M | $5.6M | $5.5M | $6.0M | $6.2M | $7.2M | $8.1M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.9M | $1.1M | $1.0M | $1.0M | $1.0M | $1.0M | $1.3M | $1.5M |
| Contract labor | $1.6M | $0.4M | $0.0M | $0.3M | $0.4M | $1.5M | $1.2M | $0.6M |
| Other operating costs | $6.8M | $6.9M | $6.5M | $6.0M | $6.7M | $8.1M | $7.7M | $6.8M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $401 | $416 | $426 | $419 | $460 | $516 | $562 | $545 |
| Cost per day | $383 | $404 | $414 | $435 | $475 | $535 | $563 | $534 |
| Average length of stay | 41.2 days | 38.8 days | 36.2 days | 49.7 days | 52.5 days | 49.7 days | 45.3 days | 51.2 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
620 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
162 · 26%
Medicaid
187 · 30%
Private pay & other
271 · 44%
Resident snapshot
74 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
13 · 18%
Medicaid
51 · 69%
Private pay & other
10 · 14%
Leaving
598 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
130 · 22%
Medicaid
191 · 32%
Private pay & other
277 · 46%
Mix of rehab and long-term care
This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.
Places of interest near Marquis Springfield
0.8 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Springfield's city center to Marquis Springfield's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Marquis Springfield
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Eugene
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the OR Dept. of Human Services (ODHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Oregon average is: 53.4% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creekside Health and Rehab of Cascadia | NH SNF | Eugene | 87
Facility
87
OR AVG
80
Rank
#37 / 91 | A |
65.2%
Facility
65.2%
OR AVG
72.7%
Rank
#49 / 70 | -10% | 5.11
Facility
5.11
OR AVG
5.48
Rank
#47 / 77 | +4% | -7% | $0
Facility
$0
OR AVG
$52.9k
Rank
#1 / 80 | 9
Facility
9
OR AVG
33.7
Rank
#5 / 78 | 2.3
Facility
2.3
OR AVG
6.5
Rank
#4 / 78 | - | 57 | - |
96
Facility
96
OR AVG
61
Rank
#1 / 95 | Cascadia Healthcare, LLC | $13.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$13.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
OR AVG
$12.5M
Rank
#32 / 73 | $7.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
OR AVG
$6.3M
Rank
#28 / 73 | 53.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
53.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
OR AVG
53.4%
Rank
#10 / 73 | 385147 | ||||
| Hillside Heights Rehabilitation Center | NH HOS RC SNF | Eugene | 83
Facility
83
OR AVG
80
Rank
#43 / 91 | B- |
72.2%
Facility
72.2%
OR AVG
72.7%
Rank
#38 / 70 | -1% | - | -46% | - | $0
Facility
$0
OR AVG
$52.9k
Rank
#1 / 80 | 44
Facility
44
OR AVG
33.7
Rank
#52 / 78 | 6.3
Facility
6.3
OR AVG
6.5
Rank
#52 / 78 | - | 60 | - |
96
Facility
96
OR AVG
61
Rank
#1 / 95 | Volare Health, LLC | $11.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$11.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
OR AVG
$12.5M
Rank
#38 / 73 | $5.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
OR AVG
$6.3M
Rank
#40 / 73 | 45.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
45.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
OR AVG
53.4%
Rank
#53 / 73 | 385046 | ||||
| Avamere Riverpark | NH RC SNF | Eugene | 119
Facility
119
OR AVG
80
Rank
#10 / 91 | B+ |
67.2%
Facility
67.2%
OR AVG
72.7%
Rank
#48 / 70 | -8% | 5.60
Facility
5.60
OR AVG
5.48
Rank
#19 / 77 | +32% | +2% | $0
Facility
$0
OR AVG
$52.9k
Rank
#1 / 80 | 47
Facility
47
OR AVG
33.7
Rank
#59 / 78 | 9.4
Facility
9.4
OR AVG
6.5
Rank
#69 / 78 | 2 | 80 | A+ |
27
Facility
27
OR AVG
61
Rank
#85 / 95 | Riverpark Operations, LLC | $20.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$20.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
OR AVG
$12.5M
Rank
#5 / 73 | $9.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$9.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
OR AVG
$6.3M
Rank
#7 / 73 | 48.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
48.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
OR AVG
53.4%
Rank
#39 / 73 | 385185 | ||||
| Valley West Health Care Center | NH SNF | Eugene | 121
Facility
121
OR AVG
80
Rank
#7 / 91 | C |
64.0%
Facility
64.0%
OR AVG
72.7%
Rank
#52 / 70 | -12% | 5.05
Facility
5.05
OR AVG
5.48
Rank
#54 / 77 | -7% | -8% | $0
Facility
$0
OR AVG
$52.9k
Rank
#45 / 80 | 61
Facility
61
OR AVG
33.7
Rank
#68 / 78 | 12.2
Facility
12.2
OR AVG
6.5
Rank
#78 / 78 | 2 | 78 | - |
32
Facility
32
OR AVG
61
Rank
#82 / 95 | Valley West Operations, LLC | $13.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$13.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
OR AVG
$12.5M
Rank
#30 / 73 | $6.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$6.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
OR AVG
$6.3M
Rank
#29 / 73 | 51.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
51.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
OR AVG
53.4%
Rank
#17 / 73 | 385120 | ||||
| Marquis Springfield | NH | Springfield | 136
Facility
136
OR AVG
80
Rank
#5 / 91 | B+ |
56.5%
Facility
56.5%
OR AVG
72.7%
Rank
#59 / 70 | -22% | 5.40
Facility
5.40
OR AVG
5.48
Rank
#28 / 77 | +18% | -1% | $0
Facility
$0
OR AVG
$52.9k
Rank
#1 / 80 | 33
Facility
33
OR AVG
33.7
Rank
#40 / 78 | 8.3
Facility
8.3
OR AVG
6.5
Rank
#56 / 78 | - | 77 | - |
56
Facility
56
OR AVG
61
Rank
#62 / 95 | Marquis Companies I, Inc | $16.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$16.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
OR AVG
$12.5M
Rank
#11 / 73 | $9.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$9.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
OR AVG
$6.3M
Rank
#9 / 73 | 57.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
57.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
OR AVG
53.4%
Rank
#7 / 73 | 385077 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other OR nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Oregon
Marquis Springfield is located in Springfield, Oregon.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Oregon.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Marquis Springfield
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Who is the owner of Marquis Springfield?
Marquis Springfield is legally operated by Marquis Companies I, Inc., and administered by Kasandra Mills.
02 Is Marquis Springfield in a walkable area?
Marquis Springfield has a walk score of 56. Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
03 What is the occupancy rate at Marquis Springfield?
Marquis Springfield's occupancy is 56.5%.
04 Are pets allowed at Marquis Springfield?
No, Marquis Springfield has a no-pet policy.
05 What is the best email address for Marquis Springfield?
The team at Marquis Springfield can be reached at klmills@marquiscompanies.com.
06 Does Marquis Springfield operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Marquis Springfield is registered as a for-profit in OR.
07 Who is the administrator of Marquis Springfield?
Kasandra Mills is the administrator of Marquis Springfield.
Updated on
