Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
168
148 employees · 20 contractors · 54 on an average day Meadowbrook Rehabilitation Hospital
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · Gardner, KS
CMS overall rating
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Meadowbrook Rehabilitation Hospital
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · Gardner, KS
CMS overall rating
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Meadowbrook Rehabilitation Hospital accepts Medicaid.
Overview of Meadowbrook Rehabilitation Hospital
Meadowbrook Rehabilitation Hospital in Gardner, Kansas, delivers round-the-clock skilled nursing care alongside specialized inpatient rehabilitation. Inpatient acute programs and dedicated brain injury therapy offer structured clinical support for individuals recovering from severe medical events, trauma, or complex illnesses.
Recover-Care Meadowbrook Rehabilitation runs the 124-bed facility, with administrator Musu Jawara directing clinical operations. Recorded care metrics reflect 3 hours and 17 minutes of direct nursing time assigned per resident each day. Financial coverage options include Medicaid for qualified applicants seeking financial assistance for ongoing care.
Prospective residents considering intensive rehab services or long-term nursing oversight can reach out to Meadowbrook Rehabilitation Hospital directly to check current admission policies, verify insurance coverage, or arrange a facility walkthrough.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 127th out of 136 nursing homes we track in Kansas for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 17m
This nursing home is ranked 127th out of 136 nursing homes we track in Kansas for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 17mStandout metric: RN, weekends is +39% above Kansas average
4 of 6 metrics below Kansas average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 27 total: 26 of the facility's own employees and 1 agency contractor.
27 staff · 8.8-hour shifts
51m
↑ 19% · KS 43mThis facility: 51m per resident per day, 19% above the Kansas average of 43m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 27 total: 26 of the facility's own employees and 1 agency contractor.
27 staff · 8.8-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 16 total: 15 of the facility's own employees and 1 agency contractor.
16 staff · 10-hour shifts
26m
↓ 35% · KS 40mThis facility: 26m per resident per day, 35% below the Kansas average of 40m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 16 total: 15 of the facility's own employees and 1 agency contractor.
16 staff · 10-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 72 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
72 staff · 9.5-hour shifts
2h 0m
↓ 25% · KS 2h 41mThis facility: 2h 0m per resident per day, 25% below the Kansas average of 2h 41m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 72 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
72 staff · 9.5-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 20m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 20m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
2m
↓ 13% · KS 2mThis facility: 2m per resident per day, 13% below the Kansas average of 2m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
2h 56m
↓ 18% · KS 3h 35mThis facility: 2h 56m per resident per day, 18% below the Kansas average of 3h 35m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
42m
↑ 39% · KS 30mThis facility: 42m per resident per day, 39% above the Kansas average of 30m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 28m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 28m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
168
148 employees · 20 contractors · 54 on an average day
168 total staff / 91 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.85 : 1
↓ 17% · KS 2.22This facility: 1.85 staff per resident, 17% below the Kansas average of 2.22 (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
168 staff ÷ 91 residents
See full Kansas ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8.7 h
↑ 13% · KS 7.7 hThis facility: 8.7 h, 13% above the Kansas average of 7.7 h (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
43,456 staff hours this quarter
See full Kansas ranking →93.1% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Kansas average: 91.7% · Contractors this quarter: Speech Language Pathologist (4), Physical Therapy Assistant (4), Respiratory Therapy Technician (4), Qualified Social Worker (3), Physical Therapy Aide (3), Registered Nurse (1), Licensed Practical Nurse (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
124
Rank #17 / 151Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 17th out of 151 nursing homes we track in Kansas for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Kansas facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
124
Rank #17 / 151Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 17th out of 151 nursing homes we track in Kansas for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Kansas facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
Residents per day (avg)
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
105
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents
About This Community
Facility TypeNursing Facility
StatusActive
CountyJohnson
License Number175130
AccreditationsCARF accredited
Meadowbrook Rehabilitation Hospital is administered by Musu Jawara.
Owner NameRecover-Care Meadowbrook Rehabilitation LLC
Resident Council
Accept Medicaid
Inpatient Acute Rehab
Brain Injury Rehabilitation
Pets not allowed
This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ. Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file — covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification surveys.
Inspection History
In Kansas, the Department for Aging and Disability Services, Survey and Certification Commission performs the unannounced inspections required for facility licensing and federal certification.
Since 2012 · 14 years of data
These figures come from state-published data and the state inspection reports we hold on file. The period covered can vary depending on document availability.
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 56 deficiencies 9 inspections
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 56 deficiencies 9 inspections
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Kansas state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Since 2012 vs. Kansas state average
Overall vs. KS average
1 Worse
Metrics worse than Kansas average:
• Deficiencies per inspection (77% above) 1 Better Metrics better than Kansas average:
• Total deficiencies (45% below)
• Deficiencies per inspection (77% above) 1 Better Metrics better than Kansas average:
• Total deficiencies (45% below)
Deficiencies
| This Facility | KS Average | vs. KS Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 56 | 101.0 | This facility has 45% fewer total deficiencies than a typical Kansas nursing home (56 vs. KS avg 101).↓ 45% better |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
Average deficiencies per inspection.
| 6.2 | 3.5 | This facility has 77% more deficiencies per inspection than a typical Kansas nursing home (6.2 vs. KS avg 3.5).↑ 77% worse |
Inspections
| This Facility | KS Average | vs. KS Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 9 | 24.0 | This facility has had 63% fewer total inspections than the Kansas average (9 vs. KS avg 24). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 63% fewer |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Total health inspections
4
↓ 7% · KS 4.3This facility: 4, 7% below the KS average of 4.3 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
47
Rank #121 / 138Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 121st out of 138 nursing homes we track in Kansas for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Kansas State average, with a ranking across all 138 KS facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 71% · KS 27.5This facility: 47, 71% above the KS average of 27.5 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
11.75
Rank #132 / 138Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 132nd out of 138 nursing homes we track in Kansas for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Kansas mean across 138 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 84% · KS 6.37This facility: 11.75, 84% above the KS average of 6.37 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
47 of 47 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
1
↑ 25% · KS 0.8This facility: 1, 25% above the KS average of 0.8 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
1
↑ 25% · KS 0.8This facility: 1, 25% above the KS average of 0.8 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
43
↑ 71% · KS 25.2This facility: 43, 71% above the KS average of 25.2 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
2
↑ 186% · KS 0.7This facility: 2, 186% above the KS average of 0.7 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Sep 16, 2025 · 14 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 10 of 47 citations · 10 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Sep 16, 2025
14 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care critical citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 12, 2024
2 citations
Abuse/Neglect serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 25, 2024
22 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 16, 2022
9 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 47 citations
Quality of Life & Care
10 deficiencies (21%)
Pharmacy Services
9 deficiencies (19%)
Resident Rights
7 deficiencies (15%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
5 deficiencies (11%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
5 deficiencies (11%)
Nursing & Physician Services
4 deficiencies (9%)
Nutrition & Dietary
3 deficiencies (6%)
Infection Control
2 deficiencies (4%)
Administration
1 deficiency (2%)
Environmental
1 deficiency (2%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
23 of 47 citations resulted from standard inspections; 2 of 47 resulted from complaint investigations; and 22 of 47 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
3 penalties in the past 3 years
Latest: Sep 16, 2025 · $22,325 civil money penalty
Sep 16, 2025 · $22,325 civil money penalty
Apr 7, 2025 · $54,152 civil money penalty
Nov 12, 2024 · $10,477 civil money penalty
Total fines
$86,954
↑ 115% · KS $40KThis facility: $86,954, 115% above the Kansas average of $40,388. Average among the 151 Kansas facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #132 / 139Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 132nd out of 139 nursing homes we track in Kansas for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Kansas average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 139 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
3
↑ 39% · KS 2.16This facility: 3, 39% above the Kansas average of 2.16. Average among the 151 Kansas facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
KS avg 0.25Kansas average: 0.25. Average among the 151 Kansas facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Sep 16, 2025
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$22,325
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$22,325
Apr 7, 2025
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$54,152
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$54,152
Nov 12, 2024
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$10,477
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$10,477Fine amount comparison
This facility
$86,954
Kansas average
$40,388
US average
$67,417
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Kansas and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Kansas average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
1
/ 5
Significantly below average
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
5.7
Score · lower is better
↓ 40% · KS 9.5This facility: 5.7, 40% below the KS average of 9.5 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
12.9
Score · lower is better
↓ 32% · KS 18.9This facility: 12.9, 32% below the KS average of 18.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 10 better, 1 worse, 2 near KS average
8 short-stay measures: 3 better, 1 worse, 1 near KS average, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7.9%
↓ 56% · KS 17.9This facility: 7.9, 56% below the KS average of 17.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7.9%
↓ 56% · KS 17.9This facility: 7.9, 56% below the KS average of 17.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
12.4%
↓ 24% · KS 16.2This facility: 12.4, 24% below the KS average of 16.2 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
12.4%
↓ 24% · KS 16.2This facility: 12.4, 24% below the KS average of 16.2 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
18.4%
↓ 19% · KS 22.6This facility: 18.4, 19% below the KS average of 22.6 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
18.4%
↓ 19% · KS 22.6This facility: 18.4, 19% below the KS average of 22.6 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.5%
↓ 82% · KS 2.9This facility: 0.5, 82% below the KS average of 2.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.5%
↓ 82% · KS 2.9This facility: 0.5, 82% below the KS average of 2.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.0%
↓ 6% · KS 4.3This facility: 4.0, 6% below the KS average of 4.3 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.0%
↓ 6% · KS 4.3This facility: 4.0, 6% below the KS average of 4.3 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.0%
↓ 32% · KS 4.4This facility: 3.0, 32% below the KS average of 4.4 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.0%
↓ 32% · KS 4.4This facility: 3.0, 32% below the KS average of 4.4 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.4%
↓ 71% · KS 4.9This facility: 1.4, 71% below the KS average of 4.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.4%
↓ 71% · KS 4.9This facility: 1.4, 71% below the KS average of 4.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.6%
↓ 91% · KS 6.5This facility: 0.6, 91% below the KS average of 6.5 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.6%
↓ 91% · KS 6.5This facility: 0.6, 91% below the KS average of 6.5 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
11.3%
↓ 38% · KS 18.1This facility: 11.3, 38% below the KS average of 18.1 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
11.3%
↓ 38% · KS 18.1This facility: 11.3, 38% below the KS average of 18.1 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
89.3%
↓ 3% · KS 92.1This facility: 89.3, 3% below the KS average of 92.1 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
89.3%
↓ 3% · KS 92.1This facility: 89.3, 3% below the KS average of 92.1 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.0%
≈ 0% · KS 95.5This facility: 96.0, level with the KS average of 95.5 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.0%
≈ 0% · KS 95.5This facility: 96.0, level with the KS average of 95.5 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.79
↑ 52% · KS 1.84This facility: 2.79, 52% above the KS average of 1.84 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.79
↑ 52% · KS 1.84This facility: 2.79, 52% above the KS average of 1.84 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.37
↓ 37% · KS 2.16This facility: 1.37, 37% below the KS average of 2.16 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.37
↓ 37% · KS 2.16This facility: 1.37, 37% below the KS average of 2.16 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
18.3%
↓ 66% · US 53.7This facility: 18.3, 66% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
18.3%
↓ 66% · US 53.7This facility: 18.3, 66% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
44.5%
↓ 12% · US 50.6This facility: 44.5, 12% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
44.5%
↓ 12% · US 50.6This facility: 44.5, 12% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
1.0%
↑ 31% · US 0.8This facility: 1.0, 31% above the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
1.0%
↑ 31% · US 0.8This facility: 1.0, 31% above the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · KS 1.9This facility: 0.0, 100% below the KS average of 1.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · KS 1.9This facility: 0.0, 100% below the KS average of 1.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
74.9%
↓ 2% · KS 76.1This facility: 74.9, 2% below the KS average of 76.1 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
74.9%
↓ 2% · KS 76.1This facility: 74.9, 2% below the KS average of 76.1 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
83.5%
↑ 13% · KS 73.8This facility: 83.5, 13% above the KS average of 73.8 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
83.5%
↑ 13% · KS 73.8This facility: 83.5, 13% above the KS average of 73.8 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
27.7%
↑ 20% · KS 23.0This facility: 27.7, 20% above the KS average of 23.0 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
27.7%
↑ 20% · KS 23.0This facility: 27.7, 20% above the KS average of 23.0 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
7.1%
↓ 39% · KS 11.7This facility: 7.1, 39% below the KS average of 11.7 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
7.1%
↓ 39% · KS 11.7This facility: 7.1, 39% below the KS average of 11.7 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Jun 2026
Resident snapshot
91 residents · Jun 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
12 · 13%
Medicaid
77 · 85%
Private pay & other
2 · 2%
Places of interest near Meadowbrook Rehabilitation Hospital
1.7 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Gardner's city center to Meadowbrook Rehabilitation Hospital's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Meadowbrook Rehabilitation Hospital
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around the area
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the KS Dept. for Aging & Disability Services (KDADS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Kansas average is: 57.3% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Derby Health & Rehabilitation LLC | NH SNF | Derby | 74
Facility
74
KS AVG
74
Rank
#57 / 151 |
95.9%
Facility
95.9%
KS AVG
80.7%
Rank
#20 / 143 | +19% | 5.42
Facility
5.42
KS AVG
4.87
Rank
#22 / 136 | -11% | +11% | $0
Facility
$0
KS AVG
$42.8k
Rank
#1 / 139 | 14
Facility
14
KS AVG
27.5
Rank
#14 / 138 | 3.5
Facility
3.5
KS AVG
6.4
Rank
#13 / 138 | - | 71 | - |
68
Facility
68
KS AVG
49
Rank
#40 / 162 | Dhrc Property Development, LLC | $10.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$10.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#45 / 139 | $5.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$5.1M
Rank
#50 / 139 | 50%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
50%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
57.3%
Rank
#93 / 139 | 175514 | ||||
| Garden Valley Retirement Village | NH IL RC SNF | Garden City | 62
Facility
62
KS AVG
74
Rank
#74 / 151 |
100.0%
Facility
100.0%
KS AVG
80.7%
Rank
#113 / 143 | +24% | 3.83
Facility
3.83
KS AVG
4.87
Rank
#107 / 136 | +144% | -21% | $0
Facility
$0
KS AVG
$42.8k
Rank
#1 / 139 | 19
Facility
19
KS AVG
27.5
Rank
#37 / 138 | 6.3
Facility
6.3
KS AVG
6.4
Rank
#68 / 138 | - | 55 | - |
70
Facility
70
KS AVG
49
Rank
#36 / 162 | Garden Valley Property LLC | $7.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#66 / 139 | $2.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$2.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$5.1M
Rank
#86 / 139 | 41.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
41.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
57.3%
Rank
#132 / 139 | 175175 | ||||
| Ahc of Overland Park LLC | NH SNF | Overland Park (South Lakes) | 38
Facility
38
KS AVG
74
Rank
#140 / 151 |
100.0%
Facility
100.0%
KS AVG
80.7%
Rank
#1 / 143 | +24% | 4.20
Facility
4.20
KS AVG
4.87
Rank
#87 / 136 | +13% | -14% | $13.4k
Facility
$13.4k
KS AVG
$42.8k
Rank
#74 / 139 | 23
Facility
23
KS AVG
27.5
Rank
#59 / 138 | 4.6
Facility
4.6
KS AVG
6.4
Rank
#29 / 138 | 1 | 38 | - |
92
Facility
92
KS AVG
49
Rank
#1 / 162 | Overland Park Rp Snf LLC | $8.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#58 / 139 | $4.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$4.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$5.1M
Rank
#60 / 139 | 50.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
50.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
57.3%
Rank
#89 / 139 | 175542 | ||||
| Prairie Sunset Home | NH AL IL PC RC SNF | Pretty Prairie | 43
Facility
43
KS AVG
74
Rank
#133 / 151 |
90.5%
Facility
90.5%
KS AVG
80.7%
Rank
#52 / 143 | +12% | 4.27
Facility
4.27
KS AVG
4.87
Rank
#64 / 136 | -33% | -12% | $0
Facility
$0
KS AVG
$42.8k
Rank
#1 / 139 | 18
Facility
18
KS AVG
27.5
Rank
#32 / 138 | 6.0
Facility
6.0
KS AVG
6.4
Rank
#60 / 138 | 1 | 39 | - |
23
Facility
23
KS AVG
49
Rank
#136 / 162 | Prairie Sunset Home Incorporated | $4.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$4.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#109 / 139 | $3.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$3.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$5.1M
Rank
#77 / 139 | 73.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
73.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
57.3%
Rank
#8 / 139 | 175489 | ||||
| Meadowbrook Rehabilitation Hospital | NH SNF | Gardner | 124
Facility
124
KS AVG
74
Rank
#17 / 151 | - | - | 3.29
Facility
3.29
KS AVG
4.87
Rank
#127 / 136 | +58% | -33% | $87.0k
Facility
$87.0k
KS AVG
$42.8k
Rank
#132 / 139 | 47
Facility
47
KS AVG
27.5
Rank
#121 / 138 | 11.8
Facility
11.8
KS AVG
6.4
Rank
#132 / 138 | 2 | 105 | - | - | Recover-Care Meadowbrook Rehabilitation LLC | - | - | - | 175130 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other KS nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Meadowbrook Rehabilitation Hospital
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Who is the owner of Meadowbrook Rehabilitation Hospital?
Meadowbrook Rehabilitation Hospital is legally operated by Recover-Care Meadowbrook Rehabilitation LLC, and administered by Musu Jawara.
02 What is the license number of Meadowbrook Rehabilitation Hospital?
According to KS state health department records, Meadowbrook Rehabilitation Hospital's license number is 175130.
03 Are pets allowed at Meadowbrook Rehabilitation Hospital?
No, Meadowbrook Rehabilitation Hospital has a no-pet policy.
04 What is the best email address for Meadowbrook Rehabilitation Hospital?
The team at Meadowbrook Rehabilitation Hospital can be reached at info@meadowbrookrh.com.
05 Does Meadowbrook Rehabilitation Hospital operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Meadowbrook Rehabilitation Hospital is registered as a for-profit in KS.
06 Who is the administrator of Meadowbrook Rehabilitation Hospital?
Musu Jawara is the administrator of Meadowbrook Rehabilitation Hospital.
07 What is the overall rating for Meadowbrook Rehabilitation Hospital?
Meadowbrook Rehabilitation Hospital received a 1-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
Updated on
