1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Established in 1964, Mission Nursing Home has been a trusted skilled care facility in Minnesota exclusively for men. Providing specialized nursing home care, the facility accommodates up to 65 seniors and addresses various health issues. It offers a serene environment where residents receive comprehensive services such as wound care, respiratory care, post-acute management of trauma, IV treatments, and more.
Beyond medical care, the facility prioritizes mental health with on-site psychiatry services, featuring weekly visits from doctors and medical professionals. Additionally, Mission Nursing Home recognizes the importance of camaraderie, fostering a close-knit brotherhood within its community. With unique amenities like an indoor smoking area for cigarettes only, the community creates a supportive and enjoyable environment that brings happiness to the lives of the men it serves. It stands out among nursing home facilities as a place where residents receive personalized care in a welcoming and engaging community.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
This nursing home is ranked 64th out of 64 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
1h 17m6 of 6 metrics below Minnesota average
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 21 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
21 staff · 7.9-hour shifts
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 4 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
4 staff · 7.7-hour shifts
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 39 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
39 staff · 7.6-hour shifts
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
97
85 employees · 12 contractors · 43 on an average day
97 total staff / 62 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.56 : 1
↓ 28% · MN 2.18This facility: 1.56 staff per resident, 28% below the Minnesota average of 2.18 (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
97 staff ÷ 62 residents
See full Minnesota ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.6 h
↑ 1% · MN 7.5 hThis facility: 7.6 h, 1% above the Minnesota average of 7.5 h (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
30,019 staff hours this quarter
See full Minnesota ranking →93.3% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Minnesota average: 90.3% · Contractors this quarter: Speech Language Pathologist (2), Respiratory Therapy Technician (2), Physical Therapy Assistant (2), Qualified Social Worker (2), Physical Therapy Aide (2), Medical Director (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
70
Rank #49 / 94Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 49th out of 94 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Minnesota facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #3 / 14Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 3rd out of 14 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Minnesota facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #100 / 104Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 100th out of 104 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Minnesota facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #23 / 61Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 23rd out of 61 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Minnesota average, with its Statewide rank out of 61. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Based on residents per day and 70 beds.
Higher than the Minnesota average: 79%
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Aug 2026)
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
7 points above the Minnesota average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100)
Category breakdown
79 severity-weighted points (33 deficiencies) · about the same as the typical CMS-certified MN facility
1 enforcement action · about the same as the typical CMS-certified MN facility (median: 1) · $14,015 in fines
37 days to fix issues · about the same as the typical CMS-certified MN facility (median: 37)
State avg 23.4 (41% worse than State average)State avg 3.92 (23% better than State average)
100% corrected
33 of 33 citations corrected State avg 0.7 (100% better than State average)State avg 0.6 (233% worse than State average)State avg 21.3 (46% worse than State average)State avg 0.7 (100% better than State average)
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
20 of 33 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 13 of 33 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection ReportsFederal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database (Data as of Aug 2026)
72% lower than Minnesota averageMinnesota average: $50K
46% fewer fines than Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 1.8
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
100% fewer payment denials than Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 0.4
Penalties imposed by CMS in the past 3 years.
1 penalty in the past 3 years
Feb 11, 2026 · $14K
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
Feb 11, 2026Last updated: Aug 2026
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
A composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and activities of daily living decline.
5.8
44% better than Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 10.3
A composite score based on activities of daily living decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence.
13.8
34% better than Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 21.0
CMS star rating based on long-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = significantly above average, 1 star = significantly below average.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
9.8%
46% better than Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 18.2%
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
10.3%
50% better than Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 20.5%
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
21.3%
13% better than Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 24.5%
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.5%
88% better than Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 4.0%
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.0%
15% worse than Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 5.2%
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.9%
89% worse than Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 2.6%
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.5%
39% better than Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 4.1%
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
9.8%
137% worse than Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 4.1%
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.4%
22% better than Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 17.1%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
In line with Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 97.4%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
In line with Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 96.1%
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
3.23
93% worse than Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 1.67
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.83
8% better than Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 1.99
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
81.5%
7% worse than Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 88.1%
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.6%
41% worse than Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 1.9%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
86.7%
5% better than Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 82.7%
Quality measures are calculated from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. For most measures, lower percentages indicate better care quality.
9% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
45% of new residents, often for short stays.
46% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jun 2026)
Total residents
62Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Historical financial and operational data for Mission Nursing Home from 2011–2024, based on CMS SNF Cost Reports. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Key figures below are for fiscal year ending in 12/2024.
Based on CMS SNF Cost Report for fiscal year ending in 12/2024.
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Money the home earns outside of resident care — such as investments, grants, rentals and other non-operating sources (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It is tracked separately from net patient revenue: it is not part of that figure, and it is not included in net patient income.
Staff salaries plus wage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement — from the home's own accounting records (CMS cost report, Worksheet A). Contract or agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs.
Rank #39 / 62Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 39th out of 62 nursing homes we track in Minnesota. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Minnesota average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll as a share of revenue: staff salaries and wage-related benefits divided by net patient revenue. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay.
Rank #28 / 62Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 28th out of 62 nursing homes we track in Minnesota. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Minnesota average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Everything it costs to run the home apart from payroll — food, utilities, supplies, maintenance, contract labor and administration. Calculated as total operating expense minus payroll (staff salaries and wage-related benefits).
The home's total operating expense for the year — all the costs of running it, salaries included (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3).
Most residents stay for extended periods and receive ongoing daily care.
New residents most often arrive under Medicaid (46% of admissions), and a typical Medicaid stay runs around 1 - 2 years.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
1.6 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Plymouth's city center to Mission Nursing Home's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 4.98 miles to nearest hospital (North Memorial Health - Robbinsdale Hospital)
Add your location
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the MN Dept. of Health, senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Minnesota average is: 70.4% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redeemer Health Care Center | NH HOS PC RC SNF | Minneapolis (Powderhorn) | 119
Facility
119
MN AVG
87
Rank
#22 / 94 | B+ |
92.6%
Facility
92.6%
MN AVG
79%
Rank
#14 / 61 | +17% | 5.19
Facility
5.19
MN AVG
4.76
Rank
#20 / 64 | -28% | +9% | $0
Facility
$0
MN AVG
$55.1k
Rank
#1 / 66 | 25
Facility
25
MN AVG
23.4
Rank
#29 / 66 | 5.0
Facility
5.0
MN AVG
3.9
Rank
#43 / 66 | - | 110 | - |
95
Facility
95
MN AVG
49
Rank
#2 / 104 | Danny Colgan | $17.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$17.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MN AVG
$11.0M
Rank
#13 / 62 | $11.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$11.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MN AVG
$7.2M
Rank
#13 / 62 | 63.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
63.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MN AVG
70.4%
Rank
#27 / 62 | 245520 | ||||
| Pelican Valley Senior Living | NH AL HOS MC RC SNF | Pelican Rapids | 28
Facility
28
MN AVG
87
Rank
#85 / 94 | A+ |
89.6%
Facility
89.6%
MN AVG
79%
Rank
#20 / 61 | +13% | 6.27
Facility
6.27
MN AVG
4.76
Rank
#4 / 64 | -10% | +32% | $0
Facility
$0
MN AVG
$55.1k
Rank
#1 / 66 | 7
Facility
7
MN AVG
23.4
Rank
#8 / 66 | 2.3
Facility
2.3
MN AVG
3.9
Rank
#10 / 66 | - | 25 | - |
58
Facility
58
MN AVG
49
Rank
#44 / 104 | Pelican Valley Health Center | $4.5MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$4.5MFiscal year ending 09/2024
MN AVG
$11.0M
Rank
#54 / 62 | $5.3MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$5.3MFiscal year ending 09/2024
MN AVG
$7.2M
Rank
#42 / 62 | 117.9%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
117.9%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
MN AVG
70.4%
Rank
#5 / 62 | 245373 | ||||
| Grand Village | NH SNF | Grand Rapids | 82
Facility
82
MN AVG
87
Rank
#44 / 94 | A+ |
75.7%
Facility
75.7%
MN AVG
79%
Rank
#40 / 61 | -4% | 4.96
Facility
4.96
MN AVG
4.76
Rank
#26 / 64 | -62% | +4% | $0
Facility
$0
MN AVG
$55.1k
Rank
#1 / 66 | 18
Facility
18
MN AVG
23.4
Rank
#21 / 66 | 3.0
Facility
3.0
MN AVG
3.9
Rank
#13 / 66 | - | 62 | - |
5
Facility
5
MN AVG
49
Rank
#101 / 104 | County Of Itasca | $11.4MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$11.4MFiscal year ending 09/2024
MN AVG
$11.0M
Rank
#25 / 62 | $7.4MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$7.4MFiscal year ending 09/2024
MN AVG
$7.2M
Rank
#23 / 62 | 65.2%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
65.2%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
MN AVG
70.4%
Rank
#17 / 62 | 245368 | ||||
| Boundary Waters Care Center | NH HOS RC SNF | Ely | 38
Facility
38
MN AVG
87
Rank
#80 / 94 | A+ |
75.0%
Facility
75.0%
MN AVG
79%
Rank
#42 / 61 | -5% | 4.97
Facility
4.97
MN AVG
4.76
Rank
#26 / 64 | +4% | +4% | $0
Facility
$0
MN AVG
$55.1k
Rank
#1 / 66 | 11
Facility
11
MN AVG
23.4
Rank
#14 / 66 | 5.5
Facility
5.5
MN AVG
3.9
Rank
#48 / 66 | - | 29 | - |
61
Facility
61
MN AVG
49
Rank
#35 / 104 | Michael Forsman | $5.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MN AVG
$11.0M
Rank
#52 / 62 | $3.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$3.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MN AVG
$7.2M
Rank
#51 / 62 | 64.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
64.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MN AVG
70.4%
Rank
#14 / 62 | 245138 | ||||
| Mission Nursing Home | NH SNF | Plymouth (Mission Farms) | 70
Facility
70
MN AVG
87
Rank
#49 / 94 | B+ |
88.3%
Facility
88.3%
MN AVG
79%
Rank
#23 / 61 | +12% | 1.29
Facility
1.29
MN AVG
4.76
Rank
#64 / 64 | +52% | -73% | $14.0k
Facility
$14.0k
MN AVG
$55.1k
Rank
#37 / 66 | 33
Facility
33
MN AVG
23.4
Rank
#43 / 66 | 3.0
Facility
3.0
MN AVG
3.9
Rank
#13 / 66 | 2 | 62 | - |
6
Facility
6
MN AVG
49
Rank
#100 / 104 | Missions, Inc Programs | $8.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MN AVG
$11.0M
Rank
#38 / 62 | $5.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MN AVG
$7.2M
Rank
#39 / 62 | 73.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
73.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MN AVG
70.4%
Rank
#28 / 62 | 245546 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other MN nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Mission Nursing Home is in the Mission Farms neighborhood of Plymouth.
Mission Nursing Home has a walk score of 6. Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Mission Nursing Home's occupancy is 88.3%.
Mission Nursing Home has been operating for approximately 39 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
No, Mission Nursing Home has a no-pet policy.
The team at Mission Nursing Home can be reached at lobrien@missionnursinghome.org.
Mission Nursing Home is registered as a non-profit in MN.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
