(888) 927-9409
Contact Us Call
(888) 927-9409
Mountain Glen Retirement Community
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Independent Living, Memory Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Mount Vernon, WA
Residents enjoying conversation in an outdoor space Chef preparing food in the dining area Staff member posing outdoors in front of a facility

Mountain Glen Retirement Community

Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Independent Living, Memory Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Mount Vernon, WA
1810 E Division St, Mount Vernon, WA 98274-4633 View map
Calculator: See prices in your area
Explore Open Rooms

Overview of Mountain Glen Retirement Community

LinkedIn

Mountain Glen Retirement Community offers nursing home, assisted living, independent living, memory care, respite care, and skilled nursing in Mount Vernon, WA. Assisted living provides help with daily tasks such as dressing, bathing, and medication while a resident keeps an apartment, while independent living provides private living with community services and no daily care. Memory care offers a secured setting with supervision for someone at risk of wandering, and skilled nursing provides licensed nursing care on site around the clock.

Respite care provides short stays, which can suit a family whose usual caregiver needs to travel or recover. With several care levels in one community, Mountain Glen Retirement Community may be a good fit for a resident whose needs grow over time and who may be able to move between care settings without leaving the community. The community has 83 beds.

Restaurant-style dining is available in an array of dining venues, and salon and barber services give residents access to personal grooming within the community. Rehabilitation services are available, while scheduled transportation supports local appointments and trips. Pets are allowed, so a resident can bring a pet when moving into the community.

A Walk Score of 89 places the area in the very walkable band, meaning most errands can be done on foot. Shops, a pharmacy, or cafes may be within a short walk, allowing a resident who no longer drives to get out independently.

Facility Direct Line (360) 424-7900
LinkedIn
By The Numbers

Community insights.

Bed count Info A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions. 83 Rank #43 / 68Bed count — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 43rd out of 68 nursing homes we track in Washington for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Washington facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.

Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.

Walk Score Info Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk. Rank #5 / 80Walk Score — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 5th out of 80 nursing homes we track in Washington for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Washington facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
89 / 100
Occupancy rate Info Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available. Rank #37 / 56Occupancy rate — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 37th out of 56 nursing homes we track in Washington for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Washington average, with its Statewide rank out of 56. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
71.1% This home usually has availability
Lower than the Washington average: 77.1%
Occupied beds
59 / 83

About this community

License Details

CountySkagit
License Number2328

Payment & Insurance

1 service
Does not accept Medicare

Therapy & Rehabilitation

2 services
Rehabilitation Services
Respite Care

Staffing & Medical

1 service
24-Hour Staffing

Additional Policies & Features

HousekeepingYes

Amenities & Lifestyle

Dining
Wellness Center
Activities
Transportation
Salon
Housekeeping
Laundry

Contact Mountain Glen Retirement Community

Inspection History

In Washington, the Department of Social and Health Services, Residential Care Services conducts unannounced inspections and issues reports on the quality of care in all licensed settings.

Since 2022 · 4 years of data These figures come from state-published data and the state inspection reports we hold on file. The period covered can vary depending on document availability.
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 75 deficiencies 12 inspections

Inspection Scorecard Info This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Washington state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.

Since 2022 vs. Washington state average
Overall vs. WA average 2 Worse Metrics worse than Washington average:
• Total deficiencies (168% above)
• Deficiencies per inspection (103% above) 0 Better No metrics in this bucket.

Deficiencies Info Deficiencies are formal regulatory issues recorded during state inspections.

This FacilityWA Averagevs. WA Avg
Total deficiencies Info Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types. 7528.0 This facility has 168% more total deficiencies than a typical Washington nursing home (75 vs. WA avg 28).↑ 168% worse
Deficiencies per inspection Info Average deficiencies per inspection. 6.33.1 This facility has 103% more deficiencies per inspection than a typical Washington nursing home (6.3 vs. WA avg 3.1).↑ 103% worse

Inspections Info State inspections evaluate whether the facility meets health and safety standards.

This FacilityWA Averagevs. WA Avg
Total inspections Info Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility. 129.0 This facility has had 33% more total inspections than the Washington average (12 vs. WA avg 9). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 33% more
Show Inspection Reports

What does this home offer?

Pets allowed icon
Pets allowed icon

Pets Allowed

Places of interest near Mountain Glen Retirement Community

Address 0.0 miles from city center Info Estimated distance in miles from Mount Vernon's city center to Mountain Glen Retirement Community's address, calculated via Google Maps.

Calculate Travel Distance to Mountain Glen Retirement Community

Add your location

Address

Compare Nursing Homes around the area

Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the WA Dept. of Social & Health Services (DSHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.

Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.

The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
Care Types in This Table AL (Assisted Living): Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing. NH (Nursing Home): 24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs. SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility): Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness. MC (Memory Care): Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia. RC (Respite Care): Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break. IL (Independent Living): Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care. HOS (Hospice Care): Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment. PC (Palliative Care): Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Washington average is: 62.6% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
Emerald Heights ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆
NH
AL
IL
MC
SNF
Ne Redmond
74
Facility 74
WA AVG 92
Rank #44 / 68
67.6%
Facility 67.6%
WA AVG 77.1%
Rank #43 / 56
-12%
5.46
Facility 5.46
WA AVG 4.22
Rank #3 / 61
 ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ +43%+29%
$39.5k
Facility $39.5k
WA AVG $87.7k
Rank #40 / 61
45
Facility 45
WA AVG 48.9
Rank #28 / 61
6.4
Facility 6.4
WA AVG 6.9
Rank #38 / 61
250-
83
Facility 83
WA AVG 51
Rank #8 / 80
Craig Comfort
$36.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility $36.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG $15.9M
Rank #3 / 51
$13.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility $13.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG $9.2M
Rank #10 / 51
35.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility 35.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG 62.6%
Rank #50 / 51
505478
Sharon Care Center ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆
NH
AL
MC
SNF
Centralia
72
Facility 72
WA AVG 92
Rank #45 / 68
100.0%
Facility 100.0%
WA AVG 77.1%
Rank #1 / 56
+30%
3.76
Facility 3.76
WA AVG 4.22
Rank #44 / 61
 ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ +25%-11%
$0
Facility $0
WA AVG $87.7k
Rank #1 / 61
36
Facility 36
WA AVG 48.9
Rank #22 / 61
9.0
Facility 9.0
WA AVG 6.9
Rank #51 / 61
-32-
49
Facility 49
WA AVG 51
Rank #40 / 80
Summit Care LLC
$10.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility $10.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG $15.9M
Rank #40 / 51
$6.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility $6.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG $9.2M
Rank #34 / 51
63.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility 63.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG 62.6%
Rank #14 / 51
505429
Washington Odd Fellows Home ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆
NH
AL
SNF
Walla Walla
71
Facility 71
WA AVG 92
Rank #46 / 68
71.8%
Facility 71.8%
WA AVG 77.1%
Rank #36 / 56
-7%
3.68
Facility 3.68
WA AVG 4.22
Rank #45 / 61
 ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ -42%-13%
$67.6k
Facility $67.6k
WA AVG $87.7k
Rank #49 / 61
54
Facility 54
WA AVG 48.9
Rank #38 / 61
6.8
Facility 6.8
WA AVG 6.9
Rank #41 / 61
351-
67
Facility 67
WA AVG 51
Rank #21 / 80
Washington Odd Fellows Home
$12.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility $12.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG $15.9M
Rank #27 / 51
$7.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility $7.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG $9.2M
Rank #22 / 51
61.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility 61.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG 62.6%
Rank #18 / 51
505421
Woodland Assisted Living ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆
NH
AL
HOS
IL
PC
RC
SNF
Woodland
32
Facility 32
WA AVG 92
Rank #66 / 68
--
3.22
Facility 3.22
WA AVG 4.22
Rank #59 / 61
 ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ -63%-24%
$31.8k
Facility $31.8k
WA AVG $87.7k
Rank #37 / 61
21
Facility 21
WA AVG 48.9
Rank #5 / 61
3.5
Facility 3.5
WA AVG 6.9
Rank #5 / 61
246A+
62
Facility 62
WA AVG 51
Rank #26 / 80
Caroline Settlemier
$5.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility $5.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG $15.9M
Rank #49 / 51
$3.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility $3.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG $9.2M
Rank #48 / 51
65.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility 65.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG 62.6%
Rank #10 / 51
505232

Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other WA nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 4 on this page. See how we rank facilities

Nursing Home Explorer

Frequently Asked Questions about Mountain Glen Retirement Community

Is Mountain Glen Retirement Community in a walkable area?

Mountain Glen Retirement Community has a walk score of 89. Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.

What is the license number of Mountain Glen Retirement Community?

According to WA state health department records, Mountain Glen Retirement Community's license number is 2328.

What is the occupancy rate at Mountain Glen Retirement Community?

Mountain Glen Retirement Community's occupancy is 71.1%.

Are pets allowed at Mountain Glen Retirement Community?

Yes, Mountain Glen Retirement Community allows residents to bring their pets.

How many beds does Mountain Glen Retirement Community have?

Mountain Glen Retirement Community has 83 beds.

Has Mountain Glen Retirement Community had any deficiencies?

Mountain Glen Retirement Community has had 75 reported deficiencies according to records from WA Dept. of Social and Health Services (DSHS).

Are there photos of Mountain Glen Retirement Community?

Yes — there are 3 photos of Mountain Glen Retirement Community in the photo gallery on this page.

Guides for Better Senior Living

Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area

Nursing Home Data Explorer

Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now

The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It

Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance

Updated on
Pricing
More
More Actions
Contact Contact Map Book a Tour Let's Chat