
New Westside Terrace (Nwst)
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Independent Living & Skilled Nursing · Longview, WA
New Westside Terrace (Nwst)
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Independent Living & Skilled Nursing · Longview, WA
New Westside Terrace is an assisted living and retirement community in Longview, Washington, in Cowlitz County. This 56-bed community offers independent and assisted living services tailored to a flexible service model. Multiple floor plans are also offered, and families pay only for the specific services they require, providing security of available support without a one-size-fits-all care package.
The community has received four state inspections, which is below the Washington state average of nine, with the most recent inspection, conducted on October 21, 2025, concluding in one deficiency related to a failure to submit an annual fire door inspection report. Earlier history also reveals a recurring theme of fire safety documentation gaps, including missing reports for fire dampers, sprinkler systems, and smoke detectors, which led to a disapproved status in May 2023. However, a medication assistance plan deficiency identified in July 2023 was corrected during that same visit, and a June 2025 follow-up confirmed ongoing medication compliance with no new findings. Notably, there were no complaint-initiated investigations. While fire safety documentation remains an area to monitor, the community’s record shows clear improvement in medication management.
Focusing on veteran benefits, the community provides financial guidance for those eligible. The programs include retirement home amenities with optional assisted living services, allowing older adults to remain in place as their care needs evolve.
New Westside Terrace is an ideal choice for independent or semi-independent older adults, including veterans, in the Longview area who value flexibility and affordability. The à la carte service model also gives families a degree of cost control that more inclusive pricing structures.
56-bed community Rank #260 / 356Bed count — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 260th out of 356 homes we track in Washington for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Washington facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
A moderately sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
Walk Score: 93 / 100 Rank #24 / 619Walk Score — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 24th out of 619 homes we track in Washington for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Washington facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Walker's paradise. Daily errands do not require a car, with many shops and services nearby.
About this community
Facility TypeBoarding Home
CountyCowlitz
License Number1590
Pets not allowed
Inspection History
In Washington, the Department of Social and Health Services, Residential Care Services conducts unannounced inspections and issues reports on the quality of care in all licensed settings.
Since 2023 · 3 years of data
These figures come from state-published and/or federal inspection records. The period covered can vary depending on document availability.
5 deficiencies
4 inspections
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Washington state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Since 2023 vs. Washington state average
Overall vs. WA average
0 Worse
No metrics in this bucket.
2 Better
Metrics better than Washington average:
• Total deficiencies (84% below)
• Deficiencies per inspection (71% below)
• Total deficiencies (84% below)
• Deficiencies per inspection (71% below)
Deficiencies
| This Facility | WA Average | vs. WA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
| 5 | 31 | This facility has 84% fewer total deficiencies than a typical Washington nursing home (5 vs. WA avg 31).↓ 84% better |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
| 1.3 | 4.51 | This facility has 71% fewer deficiencies per inspection than a typical Washington nursing home (1.3 vs. WA avg 4.51).↓ 71% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | WA Average | vs. WA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
| 4 | 9 | This facility has had 56% fewer total inspections than the Washington average (4 vs. WA avg 9). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 56% fewer |
Places of interest near New Westside Terrace (Nwst)
0.0 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Longview's city center to New Westside Terrace (Nwst)'s address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to New Westside Terrace (Nwst)
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around the area
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the WA Dept. of Social & Health Services (DSHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest to lowest based on our ranking methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Washington average is: 62.6% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Timber Ridge | NH AL IL MC SNF | Issaquah (Talus) | 26
Facility
26
WA AVG
81
Rank
#342 / 356 |
88.5%
Facility
88.5%
WA AVG
75%
Rank
#56 / 276 | +18% | 5.87
Facility
5.87
WA AVG
4.22
Rank
#2 / 61 | -34% | +39% | $0
Facility
$0
WA AVG
$87.7k
Rank
#1 / 61 | 17
Facility
17
WA AVG
48.9
Rank
#2 / 61 | 5.7
Facility
5.7
WA AVG
6.9
Rank
#25 / 61 | - | 23 | A+ |
19
Facility
19
WA AVG
51
Rank
#533 / 619 | Lcs Timber Ridge LLC | $31.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$31.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG
$15.9M
Rank
#5 / 51 | $13.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$13.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG
$9.2M
Rank
#9 / 51 | 43%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
43%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG
62.6%
Rank
#48 / 51 | 505518 | ||||
| Emerald Heights | NH AL IL MC SNF | Ne Redmond | 74
Facility
74
WA AVG
81
Rank
#191 / 356 |
67.6%
Facility
67.6%
WA AVG
75%
Rank
#199 / 276 | -10% | 5.46
Facility
5.46
WA AVG
4.22
Rank
#3 / 61 | +43% | +29% | $39.5k
Facility
$39.5k
WA AVG
$87.7k
Rank
#38 / 61 | 42
Facility
42
WA AVG
48.9
Rank
#27 / 61 | 7.0
Facility
7.0
WA AVG
6.9
Rank
#34 / 61 | 1 | 50 | - |
83
Facility
83
WA AVG
51
Rank
#64 / 619 | Craig Comfort | $36.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$36.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG
$15.9M
Rank
#3 / 51 | $13.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$13.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG
$9.2M
Rank
#10 / 51 | 35.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
35.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG
62.6%
Rank
#50 / 51 | 505478 | ||||
| Prestige Post-Acute and Rehab Center – Centralia | NH AL IL MC | Centralia | 128
Facility
128
WA AVG
81
Rank
#32 / 356 |
78.6%
Facility
78.6%
WA AVG
75%
Rank
#128 / 276 | +5% | 4.27
Facility
4.27
WA AVG
4.22
Rank
#22 / 61 | -27% | +1% | $12.7k
Facility
$12.7k
WA AVG
$87.7k
Rank
#28 / 61 | 47
Facility
47
WA AVG
48.9
Rank
#31 / 61 | 3.6
Facility
3.6
WA AVG
6.9
Rank
#5 / 61 | - | 101 | A+ |
9
Facility
9
WA AVG
51
Rank
#594 / 619 | - | $13.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$13.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG
$15.9M
Rank
#26 / 51 | $7.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$7.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG
$9.2M
Rank
#26 / 51 | 55.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
55.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG
62.6%
Rank
#25 / 51 | 505373 | ||||
| Washington Odd Fellows Home | NH AL SNF | Walla Walla | 71
Facility
71
WA AVG
81
Rank
#196 / 356 |
71.8%
Facility
71.8%
WA AVG
75%
Rank
#175 / 276 | -4% | 3.68
Facility
3.68
WA AVG
4.22
Rank
#45 / 61 | -42% | -13% | $67.6k
Facility
$67.6k
WA AVG
$87.7k
Rank
#48 / 61 | 56
Facility
56
WA AVG
48.9
Rank
#39 / 61 | 6.2
Facility
6.2
WA AVG
6.9
Rank
#29 / 61 | 3 | 51 | - |
67
Facility
67
WA AVG
51
Rank
#176 / 619 | Washington Odd Fellows Home | $12.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$12.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG
$15.9M
Rank
#27 / 51 | $7.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$7.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG
$9.2M
Rank
#22 / 51 | 61.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
61.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG
62.6%
Rank
#18 / 51 | 505421 |
Frequently Asked Questions about New Westside Terrace (Nwst)
Is New Westside Terrace (Nwst) in a walkable area?
New Westside Terrace (Nwst) has a walk score of 93. Walker's paradise. Daily errands do not require a car, with many shops and services nearby.
What is the license number of New Westside Terrace (Nwst)?
According to WA state health department records, New Westside Terrace (Nwst)'s license number is 1590.
Are pets allowed at New Westside Terrace (Nwst)?
No, New Westside Terrace (Nwst) has a no-pet policy.
How many beds does New Westside Terrace (Nwst) have?
New Westside Terrace (Nwst) has 56 beds.
Has New Westside Terrace (Nwst) had any deficiencies?
New Westside Terrace (Nwst) has had 5 reported deficiencies since 2023 according to records from WA Dept. of Social and Health Services (DSHS).
Are there photos of New Westside Terrace (Nwst)?
Yes — there are 4 photos of New Westside Terrace (Nwst) in the photo gallery on this page.
What is the address of New Westside Terrace (Nwst)?
New Westside Terrace (Nwst) is located at 1200 17Th Avenue, Longview, WA 98632.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance




