5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Community photos aren’t available yet.
To request photos, use the contact form below.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Park Ridge Nursing Home is a nursing home in Rochester, NY, providing nursing care and help with daily needs. The home has 120 beds, indicating space for 120 people receiving nursing home care.
Total nurse staffing is 4 hours 48 minutes per resident per day. That represents the daily nurse staffing time allocated to each resident. Park Ridge Nursing Home may be a good fit for someone who needs nursing home care and support with daily needs.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing hours
Daily nursing hours per resident by staff type, reported to CMS. Higher is generally better — compare this facility to state and national averages to see where staffing stands.
Hours per resident per day vs New York averages
Total nursing care
Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 48m
34% above state avg
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes.
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care.
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life.
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
1 of 6 metrics below state avg
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
120Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Based on 98 residents and 120 beds. Source: state licensing agency resident count
Lower than the New York average: 91.6%Park Ridge Nursing Home is legally operated by Park Ridge Nursing Home Inc (Not for Profit).
This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ. Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file — covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification surveys.
In New York, the Department of Health, Office of Aging and Long Term Care performs unannounced onsite inspections to monitor compliance with state and federal healthcare regulations.
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the New York state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Citations
| This Facility | NY Average | vs. NY Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total citations
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 18 | 22.0 | This facility has 18% fewer total citations than a typical New York nursing home (18 vs. NY avg 22).↓ 18% better |
|
Health citations
Citations related to resident care, clinical practices, and day-to-day operations.
| 15 | 20.0 | This facility has 25% fewer health citations than a typical New York nursing home (15 vs. NY avg 20).↓ 25% better |
|
Life safety citations
Citations related to building safety — fire prevention, emergency egress, and similar.
| 3 | 4.0 | This facility has 25% fewer life safety citations than a typical New York nursing home (3 vs. NY avg 4).↓ 25% better |
|
Citations per inspection
Average citations per inspection.
| 1.8 | 2.6 | This facility has 31% fewer citations per inspection than a typical New York nursing home (1.8 vs. NY avg 2.6).↓ 31% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | NY Average | vs. NY Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 10 | 9.0 | This facility has had 11% more total inspections than the New York average (10 vs. NY avg 9). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 11% more |
|
Inspections with citations
Inspections that resulted in at least one regulatory citation.
| 4 | 4.0 | This facility has inspections with citations in line with the New York average (4 vs. NY avg 4).— At avg |
|
Inspection citation rate
Percentage of inspections that resulted in at least one citation.
| 40% | 55% | This facility has 15 percentage points lower inspection citation rate than a typical New York nursing home (40% vs. NY avg 55%).↓ 15% better |
Complaints & Investigations
| This Facility | NY Average | vs. NY Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total complaints
Formal expressions of concern made by residents, families, or staff.
| 51 | 79.0 | This facility has 35% fewer total complaints than a typical New York nursing home (51 vs. NY avg 79).↓ 35% better |
|
Complaints per bed
Size-adjusted complaint rate based on occupied beds.
| 0.43 | 0.50 | This facility has 14% fewer complaints per bed than a typical New York nursing home (0.43 vs. NY avg 0.5).↓ 14% better |
|
Complaint investigations
On-site investigations triggered by complaints filed with New York regulators.
| 26 | 15.0 | This facility has had 73% more complaint investigations than the New York average (26 vs. NY avg 15). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 73% more |
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
New York average 4.2
Last Health inspection on May 2026
New York average 20.3
New York average 4.78
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
10 of 17 citations resulted from standard inspections; 1 of 17 resulted from complaint investigations; and 6 of 17 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
100% better than New York averageNew York average: 0.3
100% better than New York averageNew York average: 0.4
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
How this facility protects residents through staff vaccination policies and immunization practices.
Percentage of facility employees vaccinated against influenza.
Reporting period: October 1 – December 31, 2025 (Q4 2025). Source: CMS Payroll-Based Journal report.
242 total staff / 113 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).
63% more staff per resident than New York average
8% worse than New York average
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Manages medical care and health needs.
All 20 RN Staff are full-time employees. No contractors work on this role.
20
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
8.3 hoursAssists with medical care and medications.
All 44 LPN Staff are full-time employees. No contractors work on this role.
44
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
7.6 hoursHelps with daily care and mobility.
All 107 CNA Staff are full-time employees. No contractors work on this role.
107
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
7.1 hours
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
| Certified Nursing Assistant | 107 | 0 | 107 | 31,640 | 92 | 100% | 7.1 |
| Licensed Practical Nurse | 44 | 0 | 44 | 11,559 | 92 | 100% | 7.6 |
| Registered Nurse | 20 | 0 | 20 | 4,669 | 92 | 100% | 8.3 |
| Respiratory Therapy Technician | 12 | 0 | 12 | 2,516 | 80 | 87% | 7.1 |
| Physical Therapy Assistant | 16 | 0 | 16 | 2,356 | 77 | 84% | 6.9 |
| Clinical Nurse Specialist | 6 | 0 | 6 | 2,061 | 71 | 77% | 7.7 |
| Mental Health Service Worker | 4 | 0 | 4 | 1,156 | 64 | 70% | 8 |
| Speech Language Pathologist | 6 | 0 | 6 | 1,084 | 71 | 77% | 7.4 |
| Feeding Assistant | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1,056 | 92 | 100% | 6.7 |
| Other Social Services Staff | 3 | 0 | 3 | 937 | 63 | 68% | 7.7 |
| RN Director of Nursing | 2 | 0 | 2 | 858 | 63 | 68% | 7.7 |
| Nurse Practitioner | 1 | 0 | 1 | 579 | 68 | 74% | 8.5 |
| Administrator | 1 | 0 | 1 | 512 | 64 | 70% | 8 |
| Qualified Social Worker | 3 | 0 | 3 | 473 | 63 | 68% | 7.1 |
| Physician Assistant | 2 | 0 | 2 | 460 | 92 | 100% | 2.9 |
| Physical Therapy Aide | 4 | 0 | 4 | 382 | 44 | 48% | 5.9 |
| Occupational Therapy Aide | 2 | 0 | 2 | 300 | 47 | 51% | 5.3 |
| Other Physician | 1 | 0 | 1 | 158 | 66 | 72% | 2.4 |
| Medical Director | 2 | 0 | 2 | 148 | 66 | 72% | 1.1 |
| Diagnostic X-ray Services Staff | 1 | 0 | 1 | 78 | 39 | 42% | 2 |
| Nurse Aide in Training | 1 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 2 | 2% | 7.6 |
| Therapeutic Recreation Specialist | 2 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 2 | 2% | 6.5 |
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials were reported in the last 3 years.
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
A composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and activities of daily living decline.
9.6
14% worse than New York averageNew York average: 8.4
A composite score based on activities of daily living decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence.
11.4
26% better than New York averageNew York average: 15.4
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
10.7%
24% better than New York averageNew York average: 14.1%
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
13.4%
7% worse than New York averageNew York average: 12.5%
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
10.2%
48% better than New York averageNew York average: 19.5%
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
9.8%
219% worse than New York averageNew York average: 3.1%
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.3%
12% worse than New York averageNew York average: 6.5%
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
100% better than New York averageNew York average: 1.3%
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.6%
14% worse than New York averageNew York average: 5.8%
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.2%
89% better than New York averageNew York average: 19.5%
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.1%
12% better than New York averageNew York average: 13.7%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
89.0%
In line with New York averageNew York average: 91.5%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.7%
In line with New York averageNew York average: 95.3%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
72.8%
6% worse than New York averageNew York average: 77.4%
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.2%
86% better than New York averageNew York average: 1.2%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
89.9%
14% better than New York averageNew York average: 78.8%
Quality measures are calculated from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. For most measures, lower percentages indicate better care quality.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jun 2026)
Total residents
113Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Family members meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Organized group of family members that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, resident care, and activities.
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
5.5 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Rochester's city center to Park Ridge Nursing Home's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Add your location
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the NY State Dept. of Health (NYSDOH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HC (Home Care):
Professional care delivered in the person's own home, from companionship to skilled nursing.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
ADC (Adult Day Care):
Daytime supervision, health monitoring, and social activities for seniors who live at home.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The New York average is: 55.5% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edna Tina Wilson Living Center | NH HOS MC SNF | Rochester | 120
Facility
120
NY AVG
185
Rank
#262 / 422 |
98.3%
Facility
98.3%
NY AVG
91.6%
Rank
#48 / 378 | +7% | 4.67
Facility
4.67
NY AVG
3.58
Rank
#28 / 395 | -56% | +30% | $0
Facility
$0
NY AVG
$77.8k
Rank
#1 / 397 | 5
Facility
5
NY AVG
20.3
Rank
#9 / 397 | 1.7
Facility
1.7
NY AVG
4.8
Rank
#10 / 397 | - | 118 | - |
2
Facility
2
NY AVG
64
Rank
#446 / 450 | North Park Nursing Home (Not For Profit) | $12.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$12.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$28.8M
Rank
#309 / 382 | $11.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$11.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$15.0M
Rank
#213 / 382 | 85.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
85.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
55.5%
Rank
#15 / 381 | 335769 | ||||
| Friendly Home | NH HOS MC SNF | Rochester (City Of Rochester) | 200
Facility
200
NY AVG
185
Rank
#138 / 422 |
89.0%
Facility
89.0%
NY AVG
91.6%
Rank
#301 / 378 | -3% | 4.52
Facility
4.52
NY AVG
3.58
Rank
#41 / 395 | -89% | +26% | $0
Facility
$0
NY AVG
$77.8k
Rank
#1 / 397 | 18
Facility
18
NY AVG
20.3
Rank
#207 / 397 | 6.0
Facility
6.0
NY AVG
4.8
Rank
#290 / 397 | - | 178 | - |
17
Facility
17
NY AVG
64
Rank
#407 / 450 | Rochester Friendly Home Inc (Not For Profit) | $30.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$30.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$28.8M
Rank
#144 / 382 | $18.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$18.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$15.0M
Rank
#89 / 382 | 59.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
59.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
55.5%
Rank
#114 / 381 | 335476 | ||||
| St. Ann’s Community | NH ADC AL HOS IL MC PC SNF | Rochester (East Irondequoit) | 376
Facility
376
NY AVG
185
Rank
#26 / 422 |
97.9%
Facility
97.9%
NY AVG
91.6%
Rank
#69 / 378 | +7% | 4.63
Facility
4.63
NY AVG
3.58
Rank
#33 / 395 | -33% | +29% | $55.5k
Facility
$55.5k
NY AVG
$77.8k
Rank
#355 / 397 | 13
Facility
13
NY AVG
20.3
Rank
#108 / 397 | 3.3
Facility
3.3
NY AVG
4.8
Rank
#98 / 397 | 1 | 368 | - |
37
Facility
37
NY AVG
64
Rank
#359 / 450 | St Anns Home For The Aged (Not For Profit) | $56.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$56.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$28.8M
Rank
#33 / 382 | $51.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$51.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$15.0M
Rank
#11 / 382 | 90.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
90.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
55.5%
Rank
#11 / 381 | 335081 | ||||
| Jewish Home of Rochester | NH ADC AL HC IL MC PC SNF | Rochester | 328
Facility
328
NY AVG
185
Rank
#37 / 422 |
96.0%
Facility
96.0%
NY AVG
91.6%
Rank
#145 / 378 | +5% | 5.14
Facility
5.14
NY AVG
3.58
Rank
#15 / 395 | -84% | +44% | $0
Facility
$0
NY AVG
$77.8k
Rank
#1 / 397 | 7
Facility
7
NY AVG
20.3
Rank
#23 / 397 | 3.5
Facility
3.5
NY AVG
4.8
Rank
#114 / 397 | - | 315 | - |
8
Facility
8
NY AVG
64
Rank
#427 / 450 | Jewish Home Of Rochester (Not For Profit) | $58.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$58.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$28.8M
Rank
#31 / 382 | $41.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$41.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$15.0M
Rank
#15 / 382 | 71.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
71.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
55.5%
Rank
#43 / 381 | 335105 | ||||
| Park Ridge Nursing Home | NH | Rochester | 120 | 81.7% | -11% | 4.80 | -34% | +34% | $0 | 17 | 4.3 | - | 98 | - | - | Park Ridge Nursing Home Inc (Not For Profit) | - | - | - | 335369 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other NY nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Park Ridge Nursing Home is located in Rochester, New York State.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in New York State.
Park Ridge Nursing Home is legally operated by Park Ridge Nursing Home Inc (Not for Profit).
Park Ridge Nursing Home's occupancy is 81.7%.
No, Park Ridge Nursing Home has a no-pet policy.
Park Ridge Nursing Home is registered as a non-profit in NY.
Park Ridge Nursing Home received a 5-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
Park Ridge Nursing Home has 120 beds.
Park Ridge Nursing Home has had 18 reported citations according to records from New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH).
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
