River City Nursing and Rehabilitation
River City Nursing and Rehabilitation Center is an elegant community that focuses on personalized care that allows for efficient senior living care. Considerably one of the most trusted nursing homes in the city, management, and staff ensure that everything is designed and catered to the needs of all individuals. River City is a warm and welcoming home-like environment that boasts a close and tight-knit relationship where there is a mutual level of respect and trust.
Comfort and convenience are the heart of their service– ensuring that residents are able to have a speedy recovery so they can be with their families as soon as possible. Comprehensive services include rehabilitative therapy and long-term or short-term nursing care.
Capacity and availability
About this community
Occupancy
River City Nursing and Rehabilitation is administered by Christen Sobrilsky.
Inspection History
In Nebraska, the Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Public Health conducts regular inspections to ensure nursing and assisted living facilities meet state and federal standards.
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Nebraska state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Since 2010 vs. Nebraska state average• Total deficiencies (250% above)
• Deficiencies per inspection (54% above) 0 Better No metrics in this bucket.
Deficiencies
| This Facility | NE Average | vs. NE Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
| 182 | 52 | This facility has 250% more total deficiencies than a typical Nebraska nursing home (182 vs. NE avg 52).↑ 250% worse |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
| 4.1 | 2.66 | This facility has 54% more deficiencies per inspection than a typical Nebraska nursing home (4.1 vs. NE avg 2.66).↑ 54% worse |
Inspections
| This Facility | NE Average | vs. NE Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
| 44 | 13 | This facility has had 238% more total inspections than the Nebraska average (44 vs. NE avg 13). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 238% more |
Quality of care over time
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
Long-stay resident measures
Short-stay resident measures
Places of interest near River City Nursing and Rehabilitation
5.0 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Omaha's city center to River City Nursing and Rehabilitation's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to River City Nursing and Rehabilitation
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Omaha
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the NE Dept. of Health & Human Services (DHHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest to lowest based on our ranking methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Nebraska average is: 61.4% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ambassador Health of Omaha | NH AL IL SNF | Omaha | 146
Facility
146
NE AVG
81
Rank
#23 / 225 |
58.2%
Facility
58.2%
NE AVG
73.3%
Rank
#139 / 177 | -21% | 3.09
Facility
3.09
NE AVG
4.45
Rank
#115 / 119 | +122% | -31% | $0
Facility
$0
NE AVG
$38.1k
Rank
#1 / 124 | 5
Facility
5
NE AVG
18.2
Rank
#6 / 122 | 2.5
Facility
2.5
NE AVG
4.2
Rank
#18 / 122 | - | 85 | - |
51
Facility
51
NE AVG
47
Rank
#133 / 285 | Jake Bleach | $25.0MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
$25.0MFiscal year ending 06/2024
NE AVG
$7.6M
Rank
#2 / 113 | $14.7MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
$14.7MFiscal year ending 06/2024
NE AVG
$4.5M
Rank
#2 / 113 | 58.8%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
58.8%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
NE AVG
61.4%
Rank
#73 / 113 | 285127 | ||||
| Brookestone Village | NH SNF | Omaha (Millard) | 140
Facility
140
NE AVG
81
Rank
#26 / 225 |
94.3%
Facility
94.3%
NE AVG
73.3%
Rank
#13 / 177 | +29% | 4.88
Facility
4.88
NE AVG
4.45
Rank
#24 / 119 | +5% | +9% | $0
Facility
$0
NE AVG
$38.1k
Rank
#1 / 124 | 5
Facility
5
NE AVG
18.2
Rank
#6 / 122 | 1.7
Facility
1.7
NE AVG
4.2
Rank
#4 / 122 | - | 132 | - |
58
Facility
58
NE AVG
47
Rank
#89 / 285 | Abigail Meredith | $20.5MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
$20.5MFiscal year ending 06/2024
NE AVG
$7.6M
Rank
#5 / 113 | $13.1MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
$13.1MFiscal year ending 06/2024
NE AVG
$4.5M
Rank
#3 / 113 | 63.9%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
63.9%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
NE AVG
61.4%
Rank
#53 / 113 | 285242 | ||||
| Good Samaritan Society – Millard | NH SNF | Omaha (Millard) | 106
Facility
106
NE AVG
81
Rank
#56 / 225 |
69.8%
Facility
69.8%
NE AVG
73.3%
Rank
#109 / 177 | -5% | 4.85
Facility
4.85
NE AVG
4.45
Rank
#30 / 119 | +35% | +9% | $0
Facility
$0
NE AVG
$38.1k
Rank
#1 / 124 | 16
Facility
16
NE AVG
18.2
Rank
#60 / 122 | 3.2
Facility
3.2
NE AVG
4.2
Rank
#34 / 122 | - | 74 | A+ |
58
Facility
58
NE AVG
47
Rank
#89 / 285 | Naureen Bashir Rafiq | $6.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$6.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NE AVG
$7.6M
Rank
#52 / 113 | $3.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$3.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NE AVG
$4.5M
Rank
#72 / 113 | 49.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
49.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
NE AVG
61.4%
Rank
#96 / 113 | 285098 | ||||
| The Lighthouse | NH HOS SNF | Omaha (West Omaha) | 54
Facility
54
NE AVG
81
Rank
#147 / 225 |
59.3%
Facility
59.3%
NE AVG
73.3%
Rank
#137 / 177 | -19% | 5.49
Facility
5.49
NE AVG
4.45
Rank
#9 / 119 | +64% | +23% | $0
Facility
$0
NE AVG
$38.1k
Rank
#1 / 124 | 11
Facility
11
NE AVG
18.2
Rank
#37 / 122 | 3.7
Facility
3.7
NE AVG
4.2
Rank
#44 / 122 | - | 32 | A+ |
42
Facility
42
NE AVG
47
Rank
#177 / 285 | Bianca Carmel-Cooper | $5.5MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
$5.5MFiscal year ending 06/2024
NE AVG
$7.6M
Rank
#61 / 113 | $3.7MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
$3.7MFiscal year ending 06/2024
NE AVG
$4.5M
Rank
#51 / 113 | 67.6%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
67.6%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
NE AVG
61.4%
Rank
#36 / 113 | 285280 |
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Nebraska
River City Nursing and Rehabilitation is located in Omaha, Nebraska.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Nebraska.
Frequently Asked Questions about River City Nursing and Rehabilitation
What neighborhood is River City Nursing and Rehabilitation in?
River City Nursing and Rehabilitation is in the South Central Omaha neighborhood of Omaha.
Is River City Nursing and Rehabilitation in a walkable area?
River City Nursing and Rehabilitation has a walk score of 44. Somewhat walkable. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
What is the occupancy rate at River City Nursing and Rehabilitation?
River City Nursing and Rehabilitation's occupancy is 50%.
Are pets allowed at River City Nursing and Rehabilitation?
No, River City Nursing and Rehabilitation has a no-pet policy.
Who is the administrator of River City Nursing and Rehabilitation?
Christen Sobrilsky is the administrator of River City Nursing and Rehabilitation.
How many beds does River City Nursing and Rehabilitation have?
River City Nursing and Rehabilitation has 174 beds.
Has River City Nursing and Rehabilitation had any deficiencies?
River City Nursing and Rehabilitation has had 182 reported deficiencies since 2010 according to records from Nebraska Dept. of Health and Human Services (DHHS).
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance





