River of Life Residential Living
River of Life Residential Living is a compassionate community in Saint Paul, MN, that offers personal care, skilled nursing, and long-term stay. Committed to residents’ welfare, the community provides individualized care for their healthcare needs. The community also employs a faith-based approach to care, ensuring residents feel at ease during their stay.
Prioritizing residents’ holistic wellness, pastoral services, physical, and occupational therapy are provided. Hospice care is also available to ease residents’ pain and discomfort in their end-of-life journey. With Bluestone Physician Services, residents do not have to worry about their medical needs. Here, residents are guaranteed to have the finest retirement experience, accompanied by the community’s comprehensive services and nurturing environment.
Capacity and availability
How BBB ratings work
About this community
Occupancy
Staffing
Key information about the people who lead and staff this community.
Inspection History
In Minnesota, the Department of Health, Health Regulation Division is the primary authority for conducting onsite inspections and reporting on the quality of care in residential facilities.
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Minnesota state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Since 2024 vs. Minnesota state average• Total deficiencies (at MN avg)
• Deficiencies per inspection (at MN avg) 0 Better No metrics in this bucket.
Deficiencies
| This Facility | MN Average | vs. MN Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
| 11 | 11 | This facility has total deficiencies in line with the Minnesota average (11 vs. MN avg 11).— At avg |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
| 11.0 | 11 | This facility has deficiencies per inspection in line with the Minnesota average (11 vs. MN avg 11).— At avg |
Inspections
| This Facility | MN Average | vs. MN Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
| 1 | 1 | This facility has total inspections in line with the Minnesota average (1 vs. MN avg 1).— At avg |
What does this home offer?
No pets allowed
Housing Options: Private / Shared Rooms
Building Type: Single-story
Housekeeping Services
Social and Recreational Activities
Places of interest near River of Life Residential Living
4.1 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from St Paul's city center to River of Life Residential Living's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to River of Life Residential Living
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around St Paul
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the MN Dept. of Health, senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest to lowest based on our ranking methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Minnesota average is: 70.4% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shirley Chapman Sholom Home East | NH SNF | St Paul | 118
Facility
118
MN AVG
61
Rank
#79 / 529 |
77.7%
Facility
77.7%
MN AVG
75.7%
Rank
#143 / 270 | +3% | 5.65
Facility
5.65
MN AVG
4.77
Rank
#9 / 66 | +11% | +19% | $0
Facility
$0
MN AVG
$47.9k
Rank
#1 / 66 | 26
Facility
26
MN AVG
23.2
Rank
#31 / 66 | 6.5
Facility
6.5
MN AVG
3.8
Rank
#61 / 66 | 1 | 92 | - |
73
Facility
73
MN AVG
45
Rank
#91 / 614 | Lisa Edstrom | $15.1MFiscal year ending 09/2023
Facility
$15.1MFiscal year ending 09/2023
MN AVG
$11.0M
Rank
#15 / 62 | $11.5MFiscal year ending 09/2023
Facility
$11.5MFiscal year ending 09/2023
MN AVG
$7.2M
Rank
#10 / 62 | 76%Fiscal year ending 09/2023
Facility
76%Fiscal year ending 09/2023
MN AVG
70.4%
Rank
#13 / 62 | 245411 | ||||
| Walker Methodist – Westwood Ridge | NH AL IL MC RC SNF | West St Paul (West Saint Paul) | 140
Facility
140
MN AVG
61
Rank
#44 / 529 |
82.9%
Facility
82.9%
MN AVG
75.7%
Rank
#106 / 270 | +10% | 6.20
Facility
6.20
MN AVG
4.77
Rank
#5 / 66 | -3% | +30% | $15.6k
Facility
$15.6k
MN AVG
$47.9k
Rank
#41 / 66 | 30
Facility
30
MN AVG
23.2
Rank
#38 / 66 | 5.0
Facility
5.0
MN AVG
3.8
Rank
#45 / 66 | 1 | 116 | - |
63
Facility
63
MN AVG
45
Rank
#146 / 614 | Walker Methodist | $9.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$9.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
MN AVG
$11.0M
Rank
#33 / 62 | $6.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$6.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
MN AVG
$7.2M
Rank
#29 / 62 | 72%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
72%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
MN AVG
70.4%
Rank
#16 / 62 | 245618 | ||||
| Southview Acres | NH HOS MC RC SNF | West St Paul | 210
Facility
210
MN AVG
61
Rank
#10 / 529 |
82.5%
Facility
82.5%
MN AVG
75.7%
Rank
#107 / 270 | +9% | 5.06
Facility
5.06
MN AVG
4.77
Rank
#24 / 66 | -24% | +6% | $41.6k
Facility
$41.6k
MN AVG
$47.9k
Rank
#48 / 66 | 46
Facility
46
MN AVG
23.2
Rank
#56 / 66 | 3.5
Facility
3.5
MN AVG
3.8
Rank
#22 / 66 | 2 | 173 | - |
40
Facility
40
MN AVG
45
Rank
#341 / 614 | Bogey Holdings, LLC | $21.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$21.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
MN AVG
$11.0M
Rank
#6 / 62 | $11.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$11.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
MN AVG
$7.2M
Rank
#11 / 62 | 53.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
53.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
MN AVG
70.4%
Rank
#43 / 62 | 245189 | ||||
| St Anthony Park Home | NH HOS PC RC SNF | St Paul (Saint Anthony Park) | 84
Facility
84
MN AVG
61
Rank
#166 / 529 |
89.2%
Facility
89.2%
MN AVG
75.7%
Rank
#74 / 270 | +18% | 5.28
Facility
5.28
MN AVG
4.77
Rank
#16 / 66 | -12% | +11% | $8.8k
Facility
$8.8k
MN AVG
$47.9k
Rank
#37 / 66 | 41
Facility
41
MN AVG
23.2
Rank
#53 / 66 | 10.3
Facility
10.3
MN AVG
3.8
Rank
#65 / 66 | 1 | 75 | - |
80
Facility
80
MN AVG
45
Rank
#48 / 614 | Alan Markowitz | $10.0MFiscal year ending 09/2023
Facility
$10.0MFiscal year ending 09/2023
MN AVG
$11.0M
Rank
#29 / 62 | $5.0MFiscal year ending 09/2023
Facility
$5.0MFiscal year ending 09/2023
MN AVG
$7.2M
Rank
#37 / 62 | 50.3%Fiscal year ending 09/2023
Facility
50.3%Fiscal year ending 09/2023
MN AVG
70.4%
Rank
#52 / 62 | 245063 |
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Minnesota
River of Life Residential Living is located in St Paul, Minnesota.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Minnesota.
Frequently Asked Questions about River of Life Residential Living
Is River of Life Residential Living in a walkable area?
River of Life Residential Living has a walk score of 27. Somewhat walkable. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
What is the occupancy rate at River of Life Residential Living?
River of Life Residential Living's occupancy is 80%.
How long has River of Life Residential Living been in business?
River of Life Residential Living has been operating for approximately 8 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
Are pets allowed at River of Life Residential Living?
No, River of Life Residential Living has a no-pet policy.
How many beds does River of Life Residential Living have?
River of Life Residential Living has 5 beds.
Has River of Life Residential Living had any deficiencies?
River of Life Residential Living has had 11 reported deficiencies since 2024 according to records from Minnesota Dept. of Human Services (DHS).
Are there photos of River of Life Residential Living?
Yes — there are 18 photos of River of Life Residential Living in the photo gallery on this page.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance





