Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
75
35 employees · 40 contractors · 17 on an average day Sabetha Manor
Nursing Home, Home Care, Hospice Care & Skilled Nursing · Sabetha, KS
ALM Inspection Grade
A-
ALM's inspection grade is 90 / 100, an A- — 8 points above the Kansas average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 90 / 100, an A- — 8 points above the Kansas average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Sabetha Manor
Nursing Home, Home Care, Hospice Care & Skilled Nursing · Sabetha, KS
ALM Inspection Grade
A-
ALM's inspection grade is 90 / 100, an A- — 8 points above the Kansas average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 90 / 100, an A- — 8 points above the Kansas average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Sabetha Manor accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Embraced by the serene lands of Oregon Street, Sabetha, KS, Sabetha Manor Skilled Nursing by Amerocare is a renowned senior living community providing skilled nursing, hospice, adult day club, home health care, and rehabilitation. Relax and enjoy a safe retirement with beautifully designed and spacious accommodations in several studio floor plans. Helping seniors flourish and achieve their aspirations is at the core of Sabetha Manor’s commitment to seniors’ well-being.
A jam-packed calendar of engaging activities and enjoyable programs accompanies residents as they go about their day. With delicious and healthy meals, residents enjoy a delightful dining experience. Sabetha Manor is ideal for seniors who want to spend their golden years doing what they love in a place where they can receive top-tier care and support.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 58th out of 136 nursing homes we track in Kansas for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 12m
This nursing home is ranked 58th out of 136 nursing homes we track in Kansas for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 12mStandout metric: LPN / LVN is +58% above Kansas average
1 of 6 metrics below Kansas average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 5 total: 1 of the facility's own employee and 4 agency contractors.
5 staff · 8.6-hour shifts
45m
↑ 4% · KS 43mThis facility: 45m per resident per day, 4% above the Kansas average of 43m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 5 total: 1 of the facility's own employee and 4 agency contractors.
5 staff · 8.6-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 7 total: 6 of the facility's own employees and 1 agency contractor.
7 staff · 8.9-hour shifts
1h 3m
↑ 58% · KS 40mThis facility: 1h 3m per resident per day, 58% above the Kansas average of 40m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 7 total: 6 of the facility's own employees and 1 agency contractor.
7 staff · 8.9-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 38 total: 17 of the facility's own employees and 21 agency contractors.
38 staff · 7.1-hour shifts
3h 24m
↑ 26% · KS 2h 42mThis facility: 3h 24m per resident per day, 26% above the Kansas average of 2h 42m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 38 total: 17 of the facility's own employees and 21 agency contractors.
38 staff · 7.1-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 21m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
0m
↓ 91% · KS 2mThis facility: 0m per resident per day, 91% below the Kansas average of 2m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
4h 55m
↑ 37% · KS 3h 35mThis facility: 4h 55m per resident per day, 37% above the Kansas average of 3h 35m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
29m
↑ 1% · KS 29mThis facility: 29m per resident per day, 1% above the Kansas average of 29m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
75
35 employees · 40 contractors · 17 on an average day
75 total staff / 24 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
3.13 : 1
↑ 41% · KS 2.22This facility: 3.13 staff per resident, 41% above the Kansas average of 2.22 (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
75 staff ÷ 24 residents
See full Kansas ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.3 h
↓ 5% · KS 7.7 hThis facility: 7.3 h, 5% below the Kansas average of 7.7 h (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
11,433 staff hours this quarter
See full Kansas ranking →86.4% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Kansas average: 91.7% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (21), Physical Therapy Assistant (4), Registered Nurse (4), Physical Therapy Aide (2), Speech Language Pathologist (2), Licensed Practical Nurse (1), Respiratory Therapy Technician (1), Occupational Therapy Aide (1), Therapeutic Recreation Specialist (1), Qualified Social Worker (1), Medical Director (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
40
Rank #137 / 151Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 137th out of 151 nursing homes we track in Kansas for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Kansas facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
40
Rank #137 / 151Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 137th out of 151 nursing homes we track in Kansas for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Kansas facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Walk Score
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #160 / 162Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 160th out of 162 nursing homes we track in Kansas for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Kansas facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #160 / 162Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 160th out of 162 nursing homes we track in Kansas for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Kansas facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
8
/ 100
Residents per day (avg)
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
23
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
689
days
About This Community
Facility TypeNursing Facility
StatusActive
CountyNemaha
License Number175241
Americare Therapy Solutions / Rehab-to-Home program — AmericareA branded program developed by this community's operator or its partners - a named approach to programming or care, rather than an independent external certification.
Sabetha Manor is legally operated by Sabetha Manor Rehabilitation & Skilled Nursing, and administered by Dina Budke.
OwnerSabetha Nursing LLC
NF (Nursing Facility)
40 units
SNF/NF (Combined)
40 units
Total beds
40 units
Resident Council
Short-Term Rehabilitation
Physical Therapy
Occupational Therapy
Speech Therapy
Home Health Coordination
Transportation
Pets Allowed
Building TypeSingle-story
Studio
Floor plans: Type
215 sq ft
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
90 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
8 points above the Kansas average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Typical
69 severity-weighted points (16 deficiencies) · 15% lower than the typical CMS-certified KS facility (median: 82)
Enforcement
Strong
No fines on record · 0 enforcement actions
Persistence
Typical
27 days to fix issues · faster than the typical CMS-certified KS facility (median: 32)
Total health inspections
5
↑ 16% · KS 4.3This facility: 5, 16% above the KS average of 4.3 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
16
Rank #22 / 138Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 22nd out of 138 nursing homes we track in Kansas for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Kansas State average, with a ranking across all 138 KS facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 42% · KS 27.5This facility: 16, 42% below the KS average of 27.5 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
3.2
Rank #8 / 138Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 8th out of 138 nursing homes we track in Kansas for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Kansas mean across 138 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 50% · KS 6.37This facility: 3.2, 50% below the KS average of 6.37 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
16 of 16 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · KS 0.8This facility: 0, 100% below the KS average of 0.8 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · KS 0.8This facility: 0, 100% below the KS average of 0.8 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
16
↓ 37% · KS 25.2This facility: 16, 37% below the KS average of 25.2 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · KS 0.7This facility: 0, 100% below the KS average of 0.7 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Jan 22, 2026 · 3 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Nutrition & Dietary, 7 of 16 citations · 7 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Jan 22, 2026
3 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jul 17, 2025
1 citation
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jul 02, 2024
1 citation
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 20, 2024
9 citations
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 15, 2022
2 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 16 citations
Nutrition & Dietary
7 deficiencies (44%)
Resident Rights
2 deficiencies (13%)
Administration
2 deficiencies (13%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
2 deficiencies (13%)
Infection Control
1 deficiency (6%)
Nursing & Physician Services
1 deficiency (6%)
Pharmacy Services
1 deficiency (6%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
5 of 16 citations resulted from standard inspections; 2 of 16 resulted from complaint investigations; and 9 of 16 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Aug 2023.
Total fines
$0
KS avg $40KKansas average: $40,388. Average among the 151 Kansas facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
KS avg 2.16Kansas average: 2.16. Average among the 151 Kansas facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
KS avg 0.25Kansas average: 0.25. Average among the 151 Kansas facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Kansas average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
1
/ 5
Significantly below average
↓ 66% · KS 3.0This facility: 1.0, 66% below the KS average of 3.0 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
11.0
Score · lower is better
↑ 16% · KS 9.5This facility: 11.0, 16% above the KS average of 9.5 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
18.4
Score · lower is better
↓ 3% · KS 18.9This facility: 18.4, 3% below the KS average of 18.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 6 better, 7 worse
2 short-stay measures: 1 better, 1 without a benchmark
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
23.7%
↑ 32% · KS 17.9This facility: 23.7, 32% above the KS average of 17.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
23.7%
↑ 32% · KS 17.9This facility: 23.7, 32% above the KS average of 17.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
11.1%
↓ 31% · KS 16.2This facility: 11.1, 31% below the KS average of 16.2 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
11.1%
↓ 31% · KS 16.2This facility: 11.1, 31% below the KS average of 16.2 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
20.4%
↓ 10% · KS 22.6This facility: 20.4, 10% below the KS average of 22.6 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
20.4%
↓ 10% · KS 22.6This facility: 20.4, 10% below the KS average of 22.6 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.1%
↓ 63% · KS 2.9This facility: 1.1, 63% below the KS average of 2.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.1%
↓ 63% · KS 2.9This facility: 1.1, 63% below the KS average of 2.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
11.1%
↑ 160% · KS 4.3This facility: 11.1, 160% above the KS average of 4.3 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
11.1%
↑ 160% · KS 4.3This facility: 11.1, 160% above the KS average of 4.3 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.7%
↑ 30% · KS 4.4This facility: 5.7, 30% above the KS average of 4.4 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.7%
↑ 30% · KS 4.4This facility: 5.7, 30% above the KS average of 4.4 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.5%
↓ 30% · KS 4.9This facility: 3.5, 30% below the KS average of 4.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.5%
↓ 30% · KS 4.9This facility: 3.5, 30% below the KS average of 4.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
11.8%
↑ 83% · KS 6.5This facility: 11.8, 83% above the KS average of 6.5 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
11.8%
↑ 83% · KS 6.5This facility: 11.8, 83% above the KS average of 6.5 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
31.7%
↑ 75% · KS 18.1This facility: 31.7, 75% above the KS average of 18.1 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
31.7%
↑ 75% · KS 18.1This facility: 31.7, 75% above the KS average of 18.1 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 9% · KS 92.1This facility: 100.0, 9% above the KS average of 92.1 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 9% · KS 92.1This facility: 100.0, 9% above the KS average of 92.1 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 5% · KS 95.5This facility: 100.0, 5% above the KS average of 95.5 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 5% · KS 95.5This facility: 100.0, 5% above the KS average of 95.5 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.14
↑ 16% · KS 1.84This facility: 2.14, 16% above the KS average of 1.84 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.14
↑ 16% · KS 1.84This facility: 2.14, 16% above the KS average of 1.84 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
3.07
↑ 42% · KS 2.16This facility: 3.07, 42% above the KS average of 2.16 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
3.07
↑ 42% · KS 2.16This facility: 3.07, 42% above the KS average of 2.16 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 2 measures
Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
4.4%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
4.4%
Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 31% · KS 76.1This facility: 100.0, 31% above the KS average of 76.1 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 31% · KS 76.1This facility: 100.0, 31% above the KS average of 76.1 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Sabetha Manor’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 139 Kansas nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Profitable on care
17.5% operating margin
+15.5 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 6 of the last 8 reported years. Net income $0.5M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Kansas homes
44.5% payroll share of revenue
KS average 57.3%Rank #120 / 139Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 120th out of 139 nursing homes we track in Kansas for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Kansas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.2M while revenue rose $0.8M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Kansas homes.
Revenue & profit
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | KS median | Compared with KS homesRank in KS | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $3.0M | +$0.8M | Trend 20172024 | KS median $6.7M | Rank in KS Rank #135 / 139Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 135th out of 139 nursing homes we track in Kansas for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Kansas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 3% of homes | Below KS median Higher net patient revenue than 3% of KS homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $2.5M | +$0.4M | Trend 20172024 | KS median — | Rank in KS Not ranked | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $0.5M | +$0.5M | Trend 20172024 | KS median — | Rank in KS Not ranked | Profit, growing Resident care made money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 17.5% | +15.5 pts | Trend 20172024 | KS median — | Rank in KS Not ranked | Healthy margin More than 5% of revenue is left after operating expenses. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.0M | — | Trend — | KS median — | Rank in KS Not ranked | Adds to profit Income from outside resident care, on top of the profit from care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $0.5M | +$0.5M | Trend — | KS median — | Rank in KS Not ranked | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Kansas homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | KS median | Compared with KS homesRank in KS | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $1.3M | +$0.2M | Trend 20172024 | KS median $3.6M | Rank in KS Rank #138 / 139Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 138th out of 139 nursing homes we track in Kansas for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Kansas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 1% of homes | Below KS median Higher payroll than 1% of KS homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 44.5% | −10.0 pts | Trend 20172024 | KS median 54.4% | Rank in KS Rank #120 / 139Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 120th out of 139 nursing homes we track in Kansas for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Kansas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 14% of homes | 12.8 pts under KS average The KS average is 57.3% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · KS benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Kansas payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin KS payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $2.5M | $2.5M | $2.6M | $2.6M | $1.9M | $2.3M | $2.2M | $3.0M |
| Operating expenses | $2.2M | $2.3M | $2.5M | $2.5M | $2.0M | $2.4M | $2.1M | $2.5M |
| Net patient income | $0.3M | $0.1M | $0.1M | $0.1M | −$0.1M | −$0.1M | $0.0M | $0.5M |
| Operating margin | 11.3% | 4.8% | 2.5% | 4.1% | −2.9% | −4.5% | 2.0% | 17.5% |
| Net income | $0.3M | $0.1M | $0.1M | $0.2M | $0.4M | −$0.0M | $0.1M | $0.5M |
| Payroll costs | $1.3M | $1.5M | $1.5M | $1.5M | $1.2M | $1.4M | $1.2M | $1.3M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 53.6% | 60.2% | 58.6% | 56.4% | 63.2% | 61.2% | 54.5% | 44.5% |
| Beds | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 |
| Gross revenue | $2.5M | $2.5M | $2.6M | $2.6M | $1.9M | $2.3M | $2.2M | $3.0M |
| Salaries | $1.2M | $1.3M | $1.3M | $1.3M | $1.1M | $1.2M | $1.0M | $1.2M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.2M | $0.2M | $0.2M | $0.2M | $0.2M | $0.2M | $0.1M | $0.2M |
| Contract labor | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other operating costs | $0.9M | $0.9M | $1.0M | $1.0M | $0.8M | $1.0M | $0.9M | $1.1M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $201 | $200 | $211 | $226 | $239 | $250 | $275 | $290 |
| Cost per day | $178 | $191 | $205 | $217 | $246 | $261 | $269 | $239 |
| Average length of stay | 251.3 days | 245.5 days | 296.5 days | 408.7 days | 365.1 days | 454.6 days | 313.9 days | 688.7 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Jun 2026
Arriving
20 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
6 · 30%
Medicaid
7 · 35%
Private pay & other
7 · 35%
Resident snapshot
24 residents · Jun 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
1 · 4%
Medicaid
21 · 88%
Private pay & other
2 · 8%
Leaving
15 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
5 · 33%
Medicaid
6 · 40%
Private pay & other
4 · 27%
Mostly long-term care residents
Most residents stay for extended periods and receive ongoing daily care.
Places of interest near Sabetha Manor
0.5 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Sabetha's city center to Sabetha Manor's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Sabetha Manor
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around the area
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the KS Dept. for Aging & Disability Services (KDADS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HC (Home Care):
Professional care delivered in the person's own home, from companionship to skilled nursing.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
ADC (Adult Day Care):
Daytime supervision, health monitoring, and social activities for seniors who live at home.
CCRC (Continuing Care Retirement Community):
A campus with multiple care levels so residents can age in place without moving.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Kansas average is: 57.3% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brookdale Rosehill | NH AL CCRC SNF | Shawnee | 92
Facility
92
KS AVG
74
Rank
#37 / 151 | ? |
83.6%
Facility
83.6%
KS AVG
80.7%
Rank
#85 / 143 | +4% | 4.23
Facility
4.23
KS AVG
4.87
Rank
#87 / 136 | +42% | -13% | $0
Facility
$0
KS AVG
$42.8k
Rank
#1 / 139 | 36
Facility
36
KS AVG
27.5
Rank
#103 / 138 | 9.0
Facility
9.0
KS AVG
6.4
Rank
#117 / 138 | - | 77 | A+ |
54
Facility
54
KS AVG
49
Rank
#71 / 162 | Mary Patchett | $16.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$16.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#15 / 139 | $8.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$5.1M
Rank
#16 / 139 | 53.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
53.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
57.3%
Rank
#76 / 139 | 175478 | ||||
| Claridge Court | NH IL SNF | Prairie Village (Prairie Hills) | 45
Facility
45
KS AVG
74
Rank
#108 / 151 | A- |
84.4%
Facility
84.4%
KS AVG
80.7%
Rank
#72 / 143 | +5% | 4.95
Facility
4.95
KS AVG
4.87
Rank
#44 / 136 | +15% | +2% | $18.0k
Facility
$18.0k
KS AVG
$42.8k
Rank
#89 / 139 | 17
Facility
17
KS AVG
27.5
Rank
#27 / 138 | 5.7
Facility
5.7
KS AVG
6.4
Rank
#55 / 138 | 1 | 38 | - |
64
Facility
64
KS AVG
49
Rank
#43 / 162 | Lifespace Communities Inc | $15.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$15.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#16 / 139 | $7.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$5.1M
Rank
#25 / 139 | 47.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
47.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
57.3%
Rank
#110 / 139 | 175343 | ||||
| Sabetha Manor | NH HC HOS SNF | Sabetha | 40
Facility
40
KS AVG
74
Rank
#137 / 151 | A- | - | - | 5.20
Facility
5.20
KS AVG
4.87
Rank
#58 / 136 | -34% | +7% | $0
Facility
$0
KS AVG
$42.8k
Rank
#1 / 139 | 16
Facility
16
KS AVG
27.5
Rank
#22 / 138 | 3.2
Facility
3.2
KS AVG
6.4
Rank
#8 / 138 | - | 23 | - |
8
Facility
8
KS AVG
49
Rank
#160 / 162 | Sabetha Nursing LLC | $3.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$3.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#135 / 139 | $1.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$1.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$5.1M
Rank
#138 / 139 | 44.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
44.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
57.3%
Rank
#120 / 139 | 175241 | ||||
| Pleasant View Home | NH ADC AL HC IL MC SNF | Inman | 122
Facility
122
KS AVG
74
Rank
#19 / 151 | ? |
91.0%
Facility
91.0%
KS AVG
80.7%
Rank
#30 / 143 | +13% | 6.34
Facility
6.34
KS AVG
4.87
Rank
#5 / 136 | -28% | +30% | $0
Facility
$0
KS AVG
$42.8k
Rank
#1 / 139 | 22
Facility
22
KS AVG
27.5
Rank
#53 / 138 | 5.5
Facility
5.5
KS AVG
6.4
Rank
#50 / 138 | 1 | 111 | - |
31
Facility
31
KS AVG
49
Rank
#119 / 162 | Reno County | $11.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$11.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#29 / 139 | $6.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$6.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$5.1M
Rank
#37 / 139 | 53.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
53.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
57.3%
Rank
#77 / 139 | 175406 | ||||
| Diversicare of Haysville | NH HOS MC SNF | Haysville | 100
Facility
100
KS AVG
74
Rank
#29 / 151 | D- |
100.0%
Facility
100.0%
KS AVG
80.7%
Rank
#75 / 143 | +24% | 2.96
Facility
2.96
KS AVG
4.87
Rank
#132 / 136 | +20% | -39% | $38.3k
Facility
$38.3k
KS AVG
$42.8k
Rank
#114 / 139 | 43
Facility
43
KS AVG
27.5
Rank
#112 / 138 | 7.2
Facility
7.2
KS AVG
6.4
Rank
#93 / 138 | 3 | 91 | - |
61
Facility
61
KS AVG
49
Rank
#48 / 162 | Diversicare Haysville Property LLC | $8.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#52 / 139 | $3.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$3.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$5.1M
Rank
#70 / 139 | 42.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
42.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
57.3%
Rank
#127 / 139 | 175133 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other KS nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Sabetha Manor
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Who is the owner of Sabetha Manor?
Sabetha Manor is legally operated by Sabetha Manor Rehabilitation & Skilled Nursing, and administered by Dina Budke.
02 Is Sabetha Manor in a walkable area?
Sabetha Manor has a walk score of 8. Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
03 What is the license number of Sabetha Manor?
According to KS state health department records, Sabetha Manor's license number is 175241.
04 What is the occupancy rate at Sabetha Manor?
Sabetha Manor's occupancy is 47.0%.
05 Are pets allowed at Sabetha Manor?
Yes, Sabetha Manor allows residents to bring their pets.
06 Does Sabetha Manor operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Sabetha Manor is registered as a for-profit in KS.
07 Who is the administrator of Sabetha Manor?
Dina Budke is the administrator of Sabetha Manor.
Updated on
