Simmons Loving Care
Simmons Loving Care
Simmons Loving Care is a nursing home in Gary, IN, offering rehabilitation and skilled nursing. With a supportive, welcoming environment, the community ensures that older adults are well cared for throughout their stay. Residents also experience a worry-free lifestyle with 24/7 care, nutritious meals, and recreational activities. The community also strives to meet residents’ unique needs and preferences through personalized care plans.
Music, light exercises, and fun gatherings encourage residents to learn and make friends. Residents can also rest and move around comfortably with cozy living areas and spacious communal spaces. Set in the quiet residential area of Gary, near a market, the community guarantees a laid-back lifestyle. This nursing home is dedicated to helping older adults thrive in retirement, making it an ideal choice for senior living in Indiana.
46-bed community Rank #407 / 431Bed count — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 407th out of 431 homes we track in Indiana for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Indiana facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Indiana that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
A moderately sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
Walk Score: 52 / 100 Rank #199 / 551Walk Score — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 199th out of 551 homes we track in Indiana for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Indiana facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Indiana that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Moderately walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
What does this home offer?
Building Type: Single-story
On-site Medical Care and Health Services
Rehabilitative Support
Places of interest near Simmons Loving Care
2.0 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Gary's city center to Simmons Loving Care's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Simmons Loving Care
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Gary
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the IN Dept. of Health (IDOH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest to lowest based on our ranking methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Indiana average is: 51.1% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aperion Care Tolleston Park | NH HOS MC PC SNF | Gary | 178
Facility
178
IN AVG
116
Rank
#47 / 431 |
70.8%
Facility
70.8%
IN AVG
66.9%
Rank
#181 / 410 | +6% | 2.50
Facility
2.50
IN AVG
3.44
Rank
#262 / 275 | -73% | -27% | $0
Facility
$0
IN AVG
$31.4k
Rank
#1 / 278 | 60
Facility
60
IN AVG
25.0
Rank
#269 / 278 | 6.0
Facility
6.0
IN AVG
4.1
Rank
#224 / 278 | - | 126 | - |
6
Facility
6
IN AVG
40
Rank
#508 / 551 | Jillian Kutemeier | $17.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$17.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
IN AVG
$10.5M
Rank
#25 / 268 | $7.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$7.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
IN AVG
$5.2M
Rank
#46 / 268 | 43%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
43%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
IN AVG
51.1%
Rank
#209 / 268 | 155580 | ||||
| South Shore Health & Rehabilitation | NH HOS PC SNF | Gary | 100
Facility
100
IN AVG
116
Rank
#234 / 431 |
75.5%
Facility
75.5%
IN AVG
66.9%
Rank
#139 / 410 | +13% | 3.79
Facility
3.79
IN AVG
3.44
Rank
#68 / 275 | -27% | +10% | $0
Facility
$0
IN AVG
$31.4k
Rank
#1 / 278 | 63
Facility
63
IN AVG
25.0
Rank
#270 / 278 | 7.0
Facility
7.0
IN AVG
4.1
Rank
#255 / 278 | 1 | 76 | - |
56
Facility
56
IN AVG
40
Rank
#172 / 551 | Maybach Partners, LLC | $9.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$9.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
IN AVG
$10.5M
Rank
#138 / 268 | $5.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$5.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
IN AVG
$5.2M
Rank
#88 / 268 | 59.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
59.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
IN AVG
51.1%
Rank
#44 / 268 | 155530 |
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Indiana
Simmons Loving Care is located in Gary, Indiana.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Indiana.
Frequently Asked Questions about Simmons Loving Care
Is Simmons Loving Care in a walkable area?
Simmons Loving Care has a walk score of 52. Moderately walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Are pets allowed at Simmons Loving Care?
No, Simmons Loving Care has a no-pet policy.
Are there photos of Simmons Loving Care?
Yes — there is 1 photo of Simmons Loving Care in the photo gallery on this page.
What is the address of Simmons Loving Care?
Simmons Loving Care is located at 700 E 21St Ave, Gary, IN 46407.
What is the phone number of Simmons Loving Care?
(219) 882-2563 will put you in contact with the team at Simmons Loving Care.
Is Simmons Loving Care Medicare or Medicaid certified?
Simmons Loving Care is not currently listed as a CMS-certified provider of Medicare or Medicaid.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Updated on
