2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Two Palms Care Center is a skilled nursing and rehabilitation facility located in Pasadena, CA, offering skilled nursing and rehabilitative services as well as social services. They provide residents with state-of-the -art facilities and amenities aimed to enhance their well being and provide a fulfilling and comfortable stay. This includes 24/7 skilled nursing care and supervision, assistance with daily living activities, medication management and administration, a variety of therapy services, dementia care, and hospice program.
They also provide residents with strength and mobility training, if needed, memory care through mental stimulation, and regular health assessments. The residents also enjoy meal provisions prepared with consideration to their dietary needs and restrictions, grooming services, and live entertainment, as well as activities that promote their overall health and well being.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Two Palms Care Center is legally operated by Park Marino Health Center, Inc., and administered by Maria Teresita Quizon.
In California, the Department of Social Services (for assisted living facilities) and the Department of Public Health (for nursing homes) conduct inspections to ensure resident safety and regulatory compliance.
A composite 0–100 score combining this facility's inspections, citations, complaints, and enforcement actions relative to the California state average. The score below shows how many points this facility sits above or below the typical California nursing home score (the benchmark); higher is better.This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine score.
17 points below the California average for nursing homes (81/100)
Rank #1246 / 1399 in California Inspection Score — State benchmarked This home is ranked 1246th out of 1399 homes in California for Inspection Score. Shows this facility's inspection score compared to the California average among 1399 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Facilities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings are based only on facilities in California that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine score. Inspection score: 64 out of 100. Letter grade D. 17 points below the California average for nursing homes (81/100)
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the California state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Citations
| This Facility | CA Average | vs. CA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total citations
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 23 | 10 | This facility has 130% more total citations than a typical California nursing home (23 vs. CA avg 10).↑ 130% worse |
|
Serious citations (Type A)
Citations that pose an immediate risk to resident health or safety. Type A citations are the most serious and typically require prompt corrective action.
| 18 | 3 | This facility has 500% more serious citations (type a) than a typical California nursing home (18 vs. CA avg 3).↑ 500% worse |
|
Moderate citations (Type B)
Citations that do not pose an immediate risk but still represent a departure from required care or operational standards.
| 5 | 4 | This facility has 25% more moderate citations (type b) than a typical California nursing home (5 vs. CA avg 4).↑ 25% worse |
|
Citations per year
Average citations per year since 2021.
| 4.6 | 2 | This facility has 130% more citations per year than a typical California nursing home (4.6 vs. CA avg 2).↑ 130% worse |
|
Citations per inspection
Average citations per inspection.
| 0.7 | 3.3 | This facility has 79% fewer citations per inspection than a typical California nursing home (0.7 vs. CA avg 3.3).↓ 79% better |
Inspections & Visits
| This Facility | CA Average | vs. CA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total visits
Combined count of complaint visits, other regulatory visits, and official scheduled inspections.
| 31 | 16 | This facility has 94% more total visits than a typical California nursing home (31 vs. CA avg 16).↑ 94% worse |
|
Complaint visits
On-site visits triggered by formal complaints filed by residents, families, or staff.
| 15 | 13 | This facility has 15% more complaint visits than a typical California nursing home (15 vs. CA avg 13).↑ 15% worse |
|
Other visits
Regulatory visits that are neither routine inspections nor complaint investigations — administrative check-ins, follow-up reviews, licensing-related visits.
| 11 | 7 | This facility has 57% more other visits than a typical California nursing home (11 vs. CA avg 7).↑ 57% worse |
|
Official inspections
Routine, scheduled inspections conducted by state regulators to evaluate whether the facility meets federal and state standards.
| 5 | 4 | This facility has 25% more official inspections than a typical California nursing home (5 vs. CA avg 4).↑ 25% worse |
|
Complaint investigations
On-site investigations triggered by complaints filed with California regulators.
| 12 | 10 | This facility has 20% more complaint investigations than a typical California nursing home (12 vs. CA avg 10).↑ 20% worse |
California average 12.5
Last Health inspection on May 2024
California average 50.2
California average 4.65
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
33 of 38 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 5 of 38 resulted from complaint investigations.
100% better than California averageCalifornia average: 0.4
100% better than California averageCalifornia average: 1
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials were reported in the last 3 years.
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
A composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and activities of daily living decline.
9.9
49% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 6.6
A composite score based on activities of daily living decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence.
13.5
19% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 11.3
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
15.0%
36% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 11.1%
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
16.0%
33% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 12.0%
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
9.4%
16% better than California averageCalifornia average: 11.3%
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.7%
184% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 1.7%
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.0%
In line with California averageCalifornia average: 5.0%
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
100% better than California averageCalifornia average: 1.2%
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.9%
111% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 4.2%
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
11.8%
77% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 6.7%
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
30.0%
198% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 10.1%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.1%
In line with California averageCalifornia average: 98.5%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.8%
In line with California averageCalifornia average: 98.2%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
96.6%
In line with California averageCalifornia average: 94.0%
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
11.3%
681% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 1.5%
Quality measures are calculated from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. For most measures, lower percentages indicate better care quality.
74% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
25% of new residents, often for short stays.
1% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jan 2026)
Total residents
50Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Historical financial and operational data for Two Palms Care Center from 2011–2023, based on CMS SNF Cost Reports.
Key figures below are for fiscal year ending in 12/2023.
Based on CMS SNF Cost Report for fiscal year ending in 12/2023.
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Money the home earns outside of resident care — such as investments, grants, rentals and other non-operating sources (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It is tracked separately from net patient revenue: it is not part of that figure, and it is not included in net patient income.
Staff salaries plus wage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement — from the home's own accounting records (CMS cost report, Worksheet A). Contract or agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs.
Rank #302 / 327Payroll — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 302nd out of 327 homes in California for Payroll. Shows total annual staff payroll benchmarked to the California average. Higher payroll investment relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on cheaper contract labor.Facilities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings are based only on facilities in California that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Payroll as a share of revenue: staff salaries and wage-related benefits divided by net patient revenue. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay.
Rank #19 / 327Payroll % — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 19th out of 327 homes in California for Payroll %. Shows payroll as a percentage of revenue versus the California average. Well-run California facilities typically land around 56–67% — the top third Statewide. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings.Facilities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings are based only on facilities in California that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Everything it costs to run the home apart from payroll — food, utilities, supplies, maintenance, contract labor and administration. Calculated as total operating expense minus payroll (staff salaries and wage-related benefits).
The home's total operating expense for the year — all the costs of running it, salaries included (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3).
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Most new residents arrive under Medicare (74% of admissions), and a typical Medicare stay runs around 1 - 2 months.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
3.2 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Pasadena's city center to Two Palms Care Center's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 3.95 miles to nearest hospital (USC Arcadia Hospital)
Add your location
The information below is reported by the California Department of Social Services and Department of Public Health.
| Villa Gardens Retirement Community | NH SNF | Pasadena (East Villa Street) | 340
Facility
340
CA AVG
104
Rank
#39 / 1648 | - | - | 3.57
Facility
3.57
CA AVG
4.22
Rank
#253 / 327 | -23% | -15% | $70.3k
Facility
$70.3k
CA AVG
$56.5k
Rank
#300 / 334 | 76
Facility
76
CA AVG
81
Rank
#945 / 1399 | 65
Facility
65
CA AVG
50.2
Rank
#263 / 327 | 5.0
Facility
5.0
CA AVG
4.6
Rank
#222 / 327 | 4 | 19 | - |
79
Facility
79
CA AVG
57
Rank
#450 / 2087 | Providence Group Of California LLC | $11.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$11.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
$17.0M
Rank
#228 / 327 | $6.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$6.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
$7.0M
Rank
#240 / 327 | 53.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
53.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
45.2%
Rank
#182 / 327 | 55551 | ||||
| Villa Gardens | NH SNF | Pasadena | 340
Facility
340
CA AVG
104
Rank
#39 / 1648 | - | - | 5.18
Facility
5.18
CA AVG
4.22
Rank
#29 / 327 | -12% | +23% | $0
Facility
$0
CA AVG
$56.5k
Rank
#1 / 334 | 84
Facility
84
CA AVG
81
Rank
#730 / 1399 | 38
Facility
38
CA AVG
50.2
Rank
#146 / 327 | 7.6
Facility
7.6
CA AVG
4.6
Rank
#310 / 327 | - | 19 | - |
92
Facility
92
CA AVG
57
Rank
#137 / 2087 | Shaun Rushforth | $10.0MFiscal year ending 03/2024
Facility
$10.0MFiscal year ending 03/2024
CA AVG
$17.0M
Rank
#45 / 327 | $12.0MFiscal year ending 03/2024
Facility
$12.0MFiscal year ending 03/2024
CA AVG
$7.0M
Rank
#66 / 327 | 120%Fiscal year ending 03/2024
Facility
120%Fiscal year ending 03/2024
CA AVG
45.2%
Rank
#265 / 327 | 555429 | ||||
| Foothill Heights Care Center | NH ADC AL RC SNF | Pasadena (North Central) | 49
Facility
49
CA AVG
104
Rank
#1131 / 1648 |
85.9%
Facility
85.9%
CA AVG
73.8
Rank
#436 / 1496 | +16% | 3.97
Facility
3.97
CA AVG
4.22
Rank
#175 / 327 | -53% | -6% | $9.4k
Facility
$9.4k
CA AVG
$56.5k
Rank
#223 / 334 | - | 49
Facility
49
CA AVG
50.2
Rank
#204 / 327 | 3.1
Facility
3.1
CA AVG
4.6
Rank
#70 / 327 | - | 42 | A+ |
69
Facility
69
CA AVG
57
Rank
#767 / 2087 | Foothill Heights Care Center LLC | $7.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$7.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
$17.0M
Rank
#267 / 327 | $3.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$3.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
$7.0M
Rank
#311 / 327 | 50.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
50.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
45.2%
Rank
#282 / 327 | 555894 | ||||
| St. Vincent Health Care | NH SNF | Pasadena (North Central) | 78
Facility
78
CA AVG
104
Rank
#935 / 1648 |
90.6%
Facility
90.6%
CA AVG
73.8
Rank
#329 / 1496 | +23% | 4.10
Facility
4.10
CA AVG
4.22
Rank
#152 / 327 | -45% | -3% | $0
Facility
$0
CA AVG
$56.5k
Rank
#1 / 334 | - | 52
Facility
52
CA AVG
50.2
Rank
#215 / 327 | 17.3
Facility
17.3
CA AVG
4.6
Rank
#327 / 327 | - | 71 | - |
62
Facility
62
CA AVG
57
Rank
#980 / 2087 | Robert Barrett | $10.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$10.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
$17.0M
Rank
#248 / 327 | $4.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$4.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
$7.0M
Rank
#243 / 327 | 45.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
45.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
45.2%
Rank
#127 / 327 | 555119 | ||||
| Two Palms Care Center | NH | Pasadena (Pasadena Council District 4) | 112
Facility
112
CA AVG
104
Rank
#631 / 1648 | - | - | - | - | - | $0
Facility
$0
CA AVG
$56.5k
Rank
#1 / 334 | 64
Facility
64
CA AVG
81
Rank
#1246 / 1399 | 38
Facility
38
CA AVG
50.2
Rank
#146 / 327 | 5.4
Facility
5.4
CA AVG
4.6
Rank
#249 / 327 | - | 0 | A+ |
49
Facility
49
CA AVG
57
Rank
#1368 / 2087 | Estrella Choy | $7.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$7.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
$17.0M
Rank
#316 / 327 | $3.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$3.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
$7.0M
Rank
#302 / 327 | 46.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
46.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
45.2%
Rank
#19 / 327 | 55464 |
Two Palms Care Center is located in Pasadena, California.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in California.
Two Palms Care Center is in the Pasadena Council District 4 neighborhood of Pasadena.
Two Palms Care Center is legally operated by Park Marino Health Center, Inc., and administered by Maria Teresita Quizon.
Two Palms Care Center has a walk score of 49. Somewhat walkable. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Two Palms Care Center's occupancy is 0.0%.
No, Two Palms Care Center has a no-pet policy.
Two Palms Care Center is registered as a for-profit in CA.
Maria Teresita Quizon is the administrator of Two Palms Care Center.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
