Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
109
80 employees · 29 contractors · 30 on an average day Walker Methodist – Westwood Ridge
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Independent Living, Memory Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · West St Paul, MN
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Walker Methodist – Westwood Ridge
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Independent Living, Memory Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · West St Paul, MN
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Walker Methodist – Westwood Ridge accepts Medicare and private pay.
Located in West St. Paul, MN, Walker Methodist, Westwood Ridge provides nursing home, assisted living, independent living, memory care, respite care, and skilled nursing. Residents receive continuous clinical support with nursing services on-site. Its secure setting can also accommodate those living with Alzheimer’s and other forms of dementia.
The community has 140 beds and offers one-bedroom and two-bedroom housing options. Occupancy is at 83%, with residents receiving a total of 5 hours and 41 minutes of nursing care daily. Moreover, short-term stays are welcome to provide temporary relief for family caregivers. Pets are allowed, so a resident can bring an animal companion.
Meanwhile, a Walk Score of 63 places the area in the somewhat walkable band, so some errands can be done on foot. Transportation services also help residents complete off-site appointments. Payment options are Medicare and private pay.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 5th out of 63 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 41m
This nursing home is ranked 5th out of 63 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 41mStandout metric: Physical therapist is +220% above Minnesota average
1 of 6 metrics below Minnesota average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 15 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
15 staff · 7.7-hour shifts
1h 57m
↑ 83% · MN 1h 4mThis facility: 1h 57m per resident per day, 83% above the Minnesota average of 1h 4m (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 15 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
15 staff · 7.7-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 7 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
7 staff · 8.2-hour shifts
1h 24m
↑ 126% · MN 37mThis facility: 1h 24m per resident per day, 126% above the Minnesota average of 37m (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 7 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
7 staff · 8.2-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 20 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
20 staff · 7.5-hour shifts
2h 20m
↓ 8% · MN 2h 33mThis facility: 2h 20m per resident per day, 8% below the Minnesota average of 2h 33m (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 20 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
20 staff · 7.5-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 20m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 20m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
13m
↑ 220% · MN 4mThis facility: 13m per resident per day, 220% above the Minnesota average of 4m (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
4h 33m
↑ 24% · MN 3h 41mThis facility: 4h 33m per resident per day, 24% above the Minnesota average of 3h 41m (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
53m
↑ 30% · MN 41mThis facility: 53m per resident per day, 30% above the Minnesota average of 41m (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 28m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 28m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
109
80 employees · 29 contractors · 30 on an average day
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
6.5 h
↓ 13% · MN 7.5 hThis facility: 6.5 h, 13% below the Minnesota average of 7.5 h (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
17,990 staff hours this quarter
See full Minnesota ranking →85.2% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Minnesota average: 90.3% · Contractors this quarter: Physical Therapy Assistant (10), Respiratory Therapy Technician (7), Speech Language Pathologist (4), Qualified Social Worker (4), Physical Therapy Aide (3), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
140
Rank #14 / 94Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 14th out of 94 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Minnesota facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
140
Rank #14 / 94Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 14th out of 94 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Minnesota facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
Walk Score
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #28 / 104Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 28th out of 104 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Minnesota facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #28 / 104Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 28th out of 104 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Minnesota facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
63
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #28 / 61Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 28th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Minnesota average, with its Statewide rank out of 61. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #28 / 61Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 28th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Minnesota average, with its Statewide rank out of 61. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
82.9%
This home usually has availability
Based on 116 residents and 140 beds. Source: state inspection report (Aug 2023)
Higher than the Minnesota average: 78.4%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
16
days
About This Community
Pricing & Financial Information
The below pricing was updated on
$2,595/Month
StatusApproved
CountyDakota
CMS Certification Number245618
Short-Term Rehabilitation / Transitional Care
Respite CareRespite care provides families and unpaid caregivers with short-term relief from caregiving duties. Care can range from a few hours to a few weeks.
Housekeeping
Laundry & Linen
Transportation
Pets Allowed
Bistro
Wellness Center
Beauty Salon
Walking Paths
Patio
Garden
Emergency Call System
Activities
Arts & Crafts
Excursions
Wellness Classes
Dining & Nutrition
Sourced directly from the team at Walker Methodist – Westwood Ridge.
Dining & Nutrition
Sourced directly from the team at Walker Methodist – Westwood Ridge.- Bistro / café on site.
Building Type3-story
Room Types
Private Room
This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ. Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file — covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification surveys.
Inspection History
In Minnesota, the Department of Health, Health Regulation Division is the primary authority for conducting onsite inspections and reporting on the quality of care in residential facilities.
Since 2023 · 3 years of data
These figures come from state-published data and the state inspection reports we hold on file. The period covered can vary depending on document availability.
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 5 deficiencies 1 inspection
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 5 deficiencies 1 inspection
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Minnesota state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Since 2023 vs. Minnesota state average
Overall vs. MN average
0 Worse
No metrics in this bucket.
2 Better
Metrics better than Minnesota average:
• Total deficiencies (50% below)
• Deficiencies per inspection (51% below)
• Total deficiencies (50% below)
• Deficiencies per inspection (51% below)
Deficiencies
| This Facility | MN Average | vs. MN Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 5 | 10.0 | This facility has 50% fewer total deficiencies than a typical Minnesota nursing home (5 vs. MN avg 10).↓ 50% better |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
Average deficiencies per inspection.
| 5.0 | 10.3 | This facility has 51% fewer deficiencies per inspection than a typical Minnesota nursing home (5 vs. MN avg 10.3).↓ 51% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | MN Average | vs. MN Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 1 | 1.0 | This facility has total inspections in line with the Minnesota average (1 vs. MN avg 1).— At avg |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Total health inspections
6
↑ 2% · MN 5.9This facility: 6, 2% above the Minnesota average of 5.9 (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
30
Rank #36 / 66Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 36th out of 66 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Minnesota State average, with a ranking across all 66 MN facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 28% · MN 23.4This facility: 30, 28% above the Minnesota average of 23.4 (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
5
Rank #44 / 66Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 44th out of 66 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Minnesota mean across 66 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 28% · MN 3.92This facility: 5, 28% above the Minnesota average of 3.92 (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
30 of 30 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
1
↑ 43% · MN 0.7This facility: 1, 43% above the Minnesota average of 0.7 (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · MN 0.6This facility: 0, 100% below the Minnesota average of 0.6 (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
29
↑ 36% · MN 21.3This facility: 29, 36% above the Minnesota average of 21.3 (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · MN 0.7This facility: 0, 100% below the Minnesota average of 0.7 (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Apr 15, 2026 · 6 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Infection Control, 7 of 30 citations · 6 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Apr 15, 2026
6 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 23, 2025
13 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Dec 11, 2024
1 citation
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Sep 12, 2024
4 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care critical citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Feb 28, 2024
5 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Feb 01, 2024
1 citation
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 30 citations
Infection Control
7 deficiencies (23%)
Resident Rights
6 deficiencies (20%)
Quality of Life & Care
5 deficiencies (17%)
Pharmacy Services
5 deficiencies (17%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
4 deficiencies (13%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
3 deficiencies (10%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
24 of 30 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 6 of 30 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
1 penalty in the past 3 years
Latest: Sep 12, 2024 · $15,914 civil money penalty
Sep 12, 2024 · $15,914 civil money penalty
Total fines
$15,914
↓ 68% · MN $50KThis facility: $15,914, 68% below the Minnesota average of $49,948. Average among the 156 Minnesota facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #37 / 66Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 37th out of 66 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Minnesota average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 66 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
1
↓ 46% · MN 1.84This facility: 1, 46% below the Minnesota average of 1.84. Average among the 156 Minnesota facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
MN avg 0.4Minnesota average: 0.4. Average among the 156 Minnesota facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Sep 12, 2024
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$15,914
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$15,914Fine amount comparison
This facility
$15,914
Minnesota average
$49,948
US average
$67,417
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Minnesota and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Minnesota average.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
2
/ 5
Below average
↓ 35% · MN 3.1This facility: 2.0, 35% below the MN average of 3.1 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.8 short-stay measures: 3 worse, 2 near MN average, 3 compared with US only
Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
47.5%
↓ 11% · US 53.7This facility: 47.5, 11% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
47.5%
↓ 11% · US 53.7This facility: 47.5, 11% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
70.8%
↑ 40% · US 50.6This facility: 70.8, 40% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
70.8%
↑ 40% · US 50.6This facility: 70.8, 40% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.8%
↓ 4% · MN 1.9This facility: 1.8, 4% below the MN average of 1.9 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.8%
↓ 4% · MN 1.9This facility: 1.8, 4% below the MN average of 1.9 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
79.8%
↓ 9% · MN 88.1This facility: 79.8, 9% below the MN average of 88.1 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
79.8%
↓ 9% · MN 88.1This facility: 79.8, 9% below the MN average of 88.1 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
52.5%
↓ 37% · MN 82.7This facility: 52.5, 37% below the MN average of 82.7 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
52.5%
↓ 37% · MN 82.7This facility: 52.5, 37% below the MN average of 82.7 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
24.2%
↑ 5% · MN 23.1This facility: 24.2, 5% above the MN average of 23.1 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
24.2%
↑ 5% · MN 23.1This facility: 24.2, 5% above the MN average of 23.1 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
13.8%
↓ 1% · MN 14.0This facility: 13.8, 1% below the MN average of 14.0 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
13.8%
↓ 1% · MN 14.0This facility: 13.8, 1% below the MN average of 14.0 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Walker Methodist – Westwood Ridge’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 62 Minnesota nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−5.1% operating margin
+19.4 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 8 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($0.2M) trims the net loss to −$0.4M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Minnesota homes
65.4% payroll share of revenue
MN average 72.0%Rank #22 / 62Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 22nd out of 62 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Minnesota average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.7M while revenue rose $1.9M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Minnesota homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | MN median | Compared with MN homesRank in MN | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $10.9M | +$1.9M | Trend 20172024 | MN median $11.1M | Rank in MN Rank #32 / 62Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 32nd out of 62 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Minnesota average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 49% of homes | Below MN median Higher net patient revenue than 49% of MN homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $11.4M | +$0.3M | Trend 20172024 | MN median — | Rank in MN Not ranked | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$0.6M | +$1.6M | Trend 20172024 | MN median — | Rank in MN Not ranked | Loss, narrowing Resident care lost money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −5.1% | +19.4 pts | Trend 20172024 | MN median — | Rank in MN Not ranked | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.2M | — | Trend — | MN median — | Rank in MN Not ranked | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$0.4M | +$0.3M | Trend — | MN median — | Rank in MN Not ranked | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Minnesota homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | MN median | Compared with MN homesRank in MN | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $7.1M | +$0.7M | Trend 20172024 | MN median $7.5M | Rank in MN Rank #34 / 62Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 34th out of 62 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Minnesota average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 46% of homes | Below MN median Higher payroll than 46% of MN homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 65.4% | −6.6 pts | Trend 20172024 | MN median 58.1% | Rank in MN Rank #22 / 62Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 22nd out of 62 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Minnesota average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 66% of homes | 6.6 pts under MN average The MN average is 72.0% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · MN benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Minnesota payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin MN payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $8.2M | $7.8M | $8.0M | $8.3M | $8.2M | $8.8M | $9.0M | $10.9M |
| Operating expenses | $9.5M | $9.3M | $9.6M | $9.7M | $10.6M | $10.6M | $11.2M | $11.4M |
| Net patient income | −$1.4M | −$1.4M | −$1.7M | −$1.4M | −$2.4M | −$1.9M | −$2.2M | −$0.6M |
| Operating margin | −16.9% | −18.4% | −20.8% | −16.9% | −29.0% | −21.4% | −24.4% | −5.1% |
| Net income | −$3.0M | −$0.6M | −$0.7M | −$0.0M | −$0.1M | −$0.9M | −$0.7M | −$0.4M |
| Payroll costs | $5.4M | $5.7M | $5.8M | $5.7M | $6.3M | $6.2M | $6.5M | $7.1M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 66.5% | 72.1% | 73.1% | 68.2% | 76.4% | 70.4% | 72.0% | 65.4% |
| Beds | 37 | 37 | 37 | 37 | 37 | 37 | 37 | 37 |
| Gross revenue | $11.4M | $10.5M | $10.7M | $10.3M | $10.4M | $10.6M | $10.7M | $12.3M |
| Salaries | $4.8M | $5.0M | $5.0M | $5.0M | $5.4M | $5.5M | $5.8M | $6.3M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.6M | $0.7M | $0.8M | $0.7M | $0.9M | $0.7M | $0.7M | $0.8M |
| Contract labor | $0.1M | $0.0M | — | — | $0.1M | $0.4M | $0.6M | $0.3M |
| Other operating costs | $4.1M | $3.6M | $3.8M | $4.0M | $4.3M | $4.5M | $4.7M | $4.3M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $704 | $739 | $736 | $832 | $772 | $817 | $827 | $997 |
| Cost per day | $823 | $875 | $889 | $973 | $996 | $991 | $1,030 | $1,047 |
| Average length of stay | 15.3 days | 15.4 days | 15.6 days | 15.9 days | 15.4 days | 18.4 days | 16.6 days | 16.5 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Arriving
665 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
176 · 26%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
489 · 74%
Leaving
663 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
164 · 25%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
499 · 75%
Primarily short stays
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Places of interest near Walker Methodist – Westwood Ridge
1.3 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from West St Paul's city center to Walker Methodist – Westwood Ridge's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Walker Methodist – Westwood Ridge
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around St Paul
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the MN Dept. of Health, senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Minnesota average is: 72.0% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shirley Chapman Sholom Home East | NH SNF | St Paul | 118
Facility
118
MN AVG
88
Rank
#23 / 94 |
73.7%
Facility
73.7%
MN AVG
78.4%
Rank
#36 / 61 | -6% | 5.79
Facility
5.79
MN AVG
4.84
Rank
#9 / 63 | +11% | +20% | $0
Facility
$0
MN AVG
$55.1k
Rank
#1 / 66 | 26
Facility
26
MN AVG
23.4
Rank
#31 / 66 | 6.5
Facility
6.5
MN AVG
3.9
Rank
#57 / 66 | 1 | 87 | - |
73
Facility
73
MN AVG
49
Rank
#19 / 104 | Lisa Edstrom | $17.2MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$17.2MFiscal year ending 09/2024
MN AVG
$12.9M
Rank
#16 / 62 | $14.2MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$14.2MFiscal year ending 09/2024
MN AVG
$8.4M
Rank
#9 / 62 | 82.4%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
82.4%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
MN AVG
72%
Rank
#12 / 62 | 245411 | ||||
| Southview Acres | NH HOS MC RC SNF | West St Paul | 210
Facility
210
MN AVG
88
Rank
#5 / 94 |
82.3%
Facility
82.3%
MN AVG
78.4%
Rank
#29 / 61 | +5% | 5.20
Facility
5.20
MN AVG
4.84
Rank
#25 / 63 | -24% | +7% | $41.6k
Facility
$41.6k
MN AVG
$55.1k
Rank
#46 / 66 | 43
Facility
43
MN AVG
23.4
Rank
#53 / 66 | 4.3
Facility
4.3
MN AVG
3.9
Rank
#38 / 66 | 3 | 173 | - |
40
Facility
40
MN AVG
49
Rank
#66 / 104 | Bogey Holdings, LLC | $23.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$23.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MN AVG
$12.9M
Rank
#7 / 62 | $13.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$13.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MN AVG
$8.4M
Rank
#12 / 62 | 55%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
55%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MN AVG
72%
Rank
#37 / 62 | 245189 | ||||
| St Anthony Park Home | NH HOS PC RC SNF | St Paul (Saint Anthony Park) | 84
Facility
84
MN AVG
88
Rank
#42 / 94 |
88.9%
Facility
88.9%
MN AVG
78.4%
Rank
#21 / 61 | +13% | 4.75
Facility
4.75
MN AVG
4.84
Rank
#16 / 63 | -12% | -2% | $9.0k
Facility
$9.0k
MN AVG
$55.1k
Rank
#32 / 66 | 42
Facility
42
MN AVG
23.4
Rank
#51 / 66 | 8.4
Facility
8.4
MN AVG
3.9
Rank
#64 / 66 | 1 | 75 | - |
80
Facility
80
MN AVG
49
Rank
#12 / 104 | Alan Markowitz | $10.6MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$10.6MFiscal year ending 09/2024
MN AVG
$12.9M
Rank
#33 / 62 | $5.8MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$5.8MFiscal year ending 09/2024
MN AVG
$8.4M
Rank
#41 / 62 | 55%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
55%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
MN AVG
72%
Rank
#37 / 62 | 245063 | ||||
| Little Sisters of the Poor Holy Family Residence | NH AL | St. Paul | 73
Facility
73
MN AVG
88
Rank
#48 / 94 |
54.0%
Facility
54.0%
MN AVG
78.4%
Rank
#56 / 61 | -31% | 5.94
Facility
5.94
MN AVG
4.84
Rank
#3 / 63 | +34% | +23% | $13.3k
Facility
$13.3k
MN AVG
$55.1k
Rank
#35 / 66 | 29
Facility
29
MN AVG
23.4
Rank
#35 / 66 | 4.8
Facility
4.8
MN AVG
3.9
Rank
#43 / 66 | 1 | 39 | - |
77
Facility
77
MN AVG
49
Rank
#14 / 104 | Claire Mccanless | $4.2M*Fiscal year ending 2013These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | $3.6M*Fiscal year ending 2013These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 86.7%*Fiscal year ending 2013These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 245524 | ||||
| Walker Methodist – Westwood Ridge | NH AL IL MC RC SNF | West St Paul (West Saint Paul) | 140
Facility
140
MN AVG
88
Rank
#14 / 94 |
82.9%
Facility
82.9%
MN AVG
78.4%
Rank
#28 / 61 | +6% | 5.69
Facility
5.69
MN AVG
4.84
Rank
#5 / 63 | -3% | +18% | $15.9k
Facility
$15.9k
MN AVG
$55.1k
Rank
#37 / 66 | 30
Facility
30
MN AVG
23.4
Rank
#36 / 66 | 5.0
Facility
5.0
MN AVG
3.9
Rank
#44 / 66 | 1 | 116 | - |
63
Facility
63
MN AVG
49
Rank
#28 / 104 | Walker Methodist | $10.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$10.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MN AVG
$12.9M
Rank
#32 / 62 | $7.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MN AVG
$8.4M
Rank
#34 / 62 | 65.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
65.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MN AVG
72%
Rank
#22 / 62 | 245618 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other MN nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Minnesota
Walker Methodist – Westwood Ridge is located in West St Paul, Minnesota.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Minnesota.
Frequently Asked Questions about Walker Methodist – Westwood Ridge
What neighborhood is Walker Methodist – Westwood Ridge in?
Walker Methodist – Westwood Ridge is in the West Saint Paul neighborhood of West St Paul.
Is Walker Methodist – Westwood Ridge in a walkable area?
Walker Methodist – Westwood Ridge has a walk score of 63. Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
What is the occupancy rate at Walker Methodist – Westwood Ridge?
Walker Methodist – Westwood Ridge's occupancy is 82.9%.
Are pets allowed at Walker Methodist – Westwood Ridge?
Yes, Walker Methodist – Westwood Ridge allows residents to bring their pets.
What is the overall rating for Walker Methodist – Westwood Ridge?
Walker Methodist – Westwood Ridge received a 2-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
How many beds does Walker Methodist – Westwood Ridge have?
Walker Methodist – Westwood Ridge has 140 beds.
How much does Walker Methodist – Westwood Ridge cost per month?
Pricing at Walker Methodist – Westwood Ridge starts at $2,595 per month, with rates varying by floorplan and additional care needs.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Updated on
