Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
100
90 employees · 10 contractors · 35 on an average day White Oak Manor Spartanburg
Nursing Home, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Spartanburg, SC
ALM Inspection Grade
A+
ALM's inspection grade is 97 / 100, an A+ — 16 points above the South Carolina average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 97 / 100, an A+ — 16 points above the South Carolina average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
White Oak Manor Spartanburg
Nursing Home, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Spartanburg, SC
ALM Inspection Grade
A+
ALM's inspection grade is 97 / 100, an A+ — 16 points above the South Carolina average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 97 / 100, an A+ — 16 points above the South Carolina average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
White Oak Manor Spartanburg accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
White Oak Manor Spartanburg provides nursing home, memory care and skilled nursing in Spartanburg, SC. Nursing home services include long-term nursing care and short-term rehabilitation, while skilled nursing provides licensed nursing care on site around the clock.
Memory care is provided in a secured setting, with supervision for a resident who may be at risk of wandering. The community has 60 beds.
Total nurse staffing is 4 hours 50 minutes per resident per day, representing the daily hands-on nursing time allocated per resident. Rehabilitation services are available for residents who need short-term support during recovery.
White Oak Manor Spartanburg accepts Medicare, Medicaid and private pay, giving families those payment methods for covered or privately financed care. Nhc Healthcare/Spartanburg operates the community, and O Kent, III. Cecil serves as administrator.
The combination of long-term nursing care, short-term rehabilitation and memory care may suit a resident whose needs include ongoing nursing support, rehabilitation or a secured setting.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 26th out of 118 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 50m
This nursing home is ranked 26th out of 118 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 50mStandout metric: Total nursing, weekends is +33% above South Carolina average
1 of 6 metrics below South Carolina average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 11 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
11 staff · 7.9-hour shifts
47m
↑ 23% · SC 38mThis facility: 47m per resident per day, 23% above the South Carolina average of 38m (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 11 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
11 staff · 7.9-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 24 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
24 staff · 8.3-hour shifts
1h 16m
↑ 24% · SC 1h 1mThis facility: 1h 16m per resident per day, 24% above the South Carolina average of 1h 1m (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 24 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
24 staff · 8.3-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 44 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
44 staff · 8.2-hour shifts
2h 47m
↑ 26% · SC 2h 13mThis facility: 2h 47m per resident per day, 26% above the South Carolina average of 2h 13m (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 44 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
44 staff · 8.2-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 20m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 20m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
1m
↓ 75% · SC 5mThis facility: 1m per resident per day, 75% below the South Carolina average of 5m (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
4h 26m
↑ 33% · SC 3h 21mThis facility: 4h 26m per resident per day, 33% above the South Carolina average of 3h 21m (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
25m
↑ 4% · SC 24mThis facility: 25m per resident per day, 4% above the South Carolina average of 24m (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 28m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 28m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
100
90 employees · 10 contractors · 35 on an average day
100 total staff / 60 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.67 : 1
↓ 6% · SC 1.77This facility: 1.67 staff per resident, 6% below the South Carolina average of 1.77 (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
100 staff ÷ 60 residents
See full South Carolina ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8 h
↑ 1% · SC 7.9 hThis facility: 8 h, 1% above the South Carolina average of 7.9 h (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
25,555 staff hours this quarter
See full South Carolina ranking →95.3% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
South Carolina average: 89% · Contractors this quarter: Respiratory Therapy Technician (3), Speech Language Pathologist (2), Physical Therapy Aide (1), Qualified Social Worker (1), Physical Therapy Assistant (1), Medical Director (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
60
Rank #105 / 133Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 105th out of 133 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other South Carolina facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
60
Rank #105 / 133Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 105th out of 133 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other South Carolina facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Occupancy rate
Occupancy higher than 95% suggests steady demand, but availability may be limited.
Rank #3 / 87Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 3rd out of 87 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the South Carolina average, with its Statewide rank out of 87. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy higher than 95% suggests steady demand, but availability may be limited.
Rank #3 / 87Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 3rd out of 87 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the South Carolina average, with its Statewide rank out of 87. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
97.7%
This home is often near full
Based on 58.6 residents and 60 beds. Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Higher than the South Carolina average: 89.7%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
270
days
About This Community
Facility TypeHL- Nursing Home
StatusActive
CountySpartanburg
License NumberNCF-1110
Business TypeLimited Liability
CMS Certification Number425024
White Oak Manor Spartanburg is legally operated by Nhc Healthcare/Spartanburg LLC, and administered by O Kent Cecil, III.
Owner NameNhc Healthcare/Spartanburg LLC
Institutional Nursing Home
60 units
Total beds
60 units
Resident Council
Administrator Emailtonya.bryant0536@fundltc.com
Short-Term Rehab
Short Term Rehabilitation
Pets not allowed
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
97 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
16 points above the South Carolina average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Strong
13 severity-weighted points (7 deficiencies) · 3× lower than the typical CMS-certified SC facility (median: 42)
Enforcement
Strong
No fines on record · 0 enforcement actions
Persistence
Strong
19 days to fix issues · faster than the typical CMS-certified SC facility (median: 27)
Total health inspections
3
↓ 19% · SC 3.7This facility: 3, 19% below the SC average of 3.7 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
7
Rank #28 / 116Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 28th out of 116 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the South Carolina State average, with a ranking across all 116 SC facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 45% · SC 12.7This facility: 7, 45% below the SC average of 12.7 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
2.33
Rank #31 / 116Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 31st out of 116 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the South Carolina mean across 116 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 31% · SC 3.4This facility: 2.33, 31% below the SC average of 3.4 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
7 of 7 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · SC 0.8This facility: 0, 100% below the SC average of 0.8 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · SC 0.3This facility: 0, 100% below the SC average of 0.3 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
7
↓ 40% · SC 11.6This facility: 7, 40% below the SC average of 11.6 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · SC 0.1This facility: 0, 100% below the SC average of 0.1 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Mar 26, 2026 · 3 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Infection Control, 2 of 7 citations · 5 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Mar 26, 2026
3 citations
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 14, 2025
2 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jun 07, 2023
2 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 7 citations
Infection Control
2 deficiencies (29%)
Pharmacy Services
2 deficiencies (29%)
Resident Rights
1 deficiency (14%)
Quality of Life & Care
1 deficiency (14%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
1 deficiency (14%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
All 7 citations resulted from standard inspections.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Oct 2023.
Total fines
$0
SC avg $28KSouth Carolina average: $28,139. Average among the 98 South Carolina facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
SC avg 2.03South Carolina average: 2.03. Average among the 98 South Carolina facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
SC avg 0.1South Carolina average: 0.1. Average among the 98 South Carolina facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the South Carolina average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
3
/ 5
Average
↓ 24% · SC 3.9This facility: 3.0, 24% below the SC average of 3.9 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
8.8
Score · lower is better
↑ 18% · SC 7.4This facility: 8.8, 18% above the SC average of 7.4 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
20.1
Score · lower is better
↑ 49% · SC 13.5This facility: 20.1, 49% above the SC average of 13.5 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 8 better, 4 worse, 1 near SC average
1 short-stay measure: 1 worse
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
24.3%
↑ 109% · SC 11.6This facility: 24.3, 109% above the SC average of 11.6 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
24.3%
↑ 109% · SC 11.6This facility: 24.3, 109% above the SC average of 11.6 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
12.3%
↑ 4% · SC 11.8This facility: 12.3, 4% above the SC average of 11.8 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
12.3%
↑ 4% · SC 11.8This facility: 12.3, 4% above the SC average of 11.8 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
23.6%
↑ 46% · SC 16.2This facility: 23.6, 46% above the SC average of 16.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
23.6%
↑ 46% · SC 16.2This facility: 23.6, 46% above the SC average of 16.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.1%
↑ 152% · SC 1.2This facility: 3.1, 152% above the SC average of 1.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.1%
↑ 152% · SC 1.2This facility: 3.1, 152% above the SC average of 1.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.5%
↑ 11% · SC 3.2This facility: 3.5, 11% above the SC average of 3.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.5%
↑ 11% · SC 3.2This facility: 3.5, 11% above the SC average of 3.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
↓ 100% · SC 4.9This facility: 0.0, 100% below the SC average of 4.9 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
↓ 100% · SC 4.9This facility: 0.0, 100% below the SC average of 4.9 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.7%
↓ 40% · SC 6.1This facility: 3.7, 40% below the SC average of 6.1 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.7%
↓ 40% · SC 6.1This facility: 3.7, 40% below the SC average of 6.1 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · SC 3.2This facility: 0.0, 100% below the SC average of 3.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · SC 3.2This facility: 0.0, 100% below the SC average of 3.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.6%
↓ 18% · SC 15.4This facility: 12.6, 18% below the SC average of 15.4 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.6%
↓ 18% · SC 15.4This facility: 12.6, 18% below the SC average of 15.4 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.1%
↑ 8% · SC 91.8This facility: 99.1, 8% above the SC average of 91.8 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.1%
↑ 8% · SC 91.8This facility: 99.1, 8% above the SC average of 91.8 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.4%
↑ 6% · SC 92.5This facility: 98.4, 6% above the SC average of 92.5 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.4%
↑ 6% · SC 92.5This facility: 98.4, 6% above the SC average of 92.5 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.82
↓ 10% · SC 2.03This facility: 1.82, 10% below the SC average of 2.03 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.82
↓ 10% · SC 2.03This facility: 1.82, 10% below the SC average of 2.03 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.77
↓ 7% · SC 1.91This facility: 1.77, 7% below the SC average of 1.91 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.77
↓ 7% · SC 1.91This facility: 1.77, 7% below the SC average of 1.91 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 1 measures
Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
64.0%
↓ 22% · SC 81.9This facility: 64.0, 22% below the SC average of 81.9 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
64.0%
↓ 22% · SC 81.9This facility: 64.0, 22% below the SC average of 81.9 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
White Oak Manor Spartanburg’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending 2023. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY 2023
Latest cost report is for the fiscal year ending 2023, older than most South Carolina homes. Rankings are not shown because peers report different years.
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−13.8% operating margin
+10.1 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 8 of the last 8 reported years. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends more on payroll than most South Carolina homes
80.4% payroll share of revenue
SC average 60.8%
Payroll fell $0.1M while revenue rose $0.5M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2023 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2023 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with South Carolina homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2023 | vs prior year | Trend 2016 → 2023Trend | SC median | Compared with SC homesRank in SC | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $5.6M | +$0.5M | Trend 20162023 | SC median $11.8M | Rank in SC Not ranked | Not ranked No state rank for this year: homes are ranked only when their latest cost report is recent enough to compare. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $6.3M | +$0.1M | Trend 20162023 | SC median $12.9M | Rank in SC Not ranked | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$0.8M | +$0.4M | Trend 20162023 | SC median $0.1M | Rank in SC Not ranked | Loss, narrowing Resident care lost money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −13.8% | +10.1 pts | Trend 20162023 | SC median 1.2% | Rank in SC Not ranked | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$0.8M | +$0.3M | Trend — | SC median $0.3M | Rank in SC Not ranked | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends more of revenue on staff than most South Carolina homes
| Metric | FY 2023 | vs prior year | Trend 2016 → 2023Trend | SC median | Compared with SC homesRank in SC | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $4.5M | −$0.1M | Trend 20162023 | SC median $7.4M | Rank in SC Not ranked | Not ranked No state rank for this year: homes are ranked only when their latest cost report is recent enough to compare. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 80.4% | −10.7 pts | Trend 20162023 | SC median 57.6% | Rank in SC Not ranked | 19.6 pts over SC average The SC average is 60.8% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2016–2023 2 charts · SC benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the South Carolina payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin SC payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2016–2023 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $12.4M | $9.4M | $5.5M | $5.1M | $5.2M | $4.7M | $5.1M | $5.6M |
| Operating expenses | $12.6M | $10.0M | $5.8M | $5.7M | $5.9M | $6.2M | $6.3M | $6.3M |
| Net patient income | −$0.3M | −$0.6M | −$0.3M | −$0.6M | −$0.8M | −$1.5M | −$1.2M | −$0.8M |
| Operating margin | −2.0% | −6.3% | −5.9% | −12.3% | −14.8% | −31.3% | −23.9% | −13.8% |
| Net income | −$0.2M | −$0.4M | −$0.3M | −$0.6M | −$0.8M | −$1.5M | −$1.1M | −$0.8M |
| Payroll costs | $8.2M | $6.5M | $3.7M | $3.6M | $3.8M | $4.1M | $4.6M | $4.5M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 66.0% | 68.4% | 67.0% | 70.6% | 73.4% | 86.6% | 91.1% | 80.4% |
| Beds | 192 | 138 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 |
| Gross revenue | $14.8M | $11.0M | $6.5M | $5.8M | $5.8M | $5.6M | $5.4M | $6.1M |
| Salaries | $6.7M | $5.3M | $2.9M | $2.9M | $3.2M | $3.4M | $3.8M | $3.8M |
| Wage-related costs | $1.5M | $1.2M | $0.7M | $0.6M | $0.6M | $0.6M | $0.8M | $0.7M |
| Contract labor | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other operating costs | $4.5M | $3.6M | $2.1M | $2.1M | $2.1M | $2.1M | $1.7M | $1.9M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $215 | $221 | $276 | $271 | $280 | $311 | $272 | $295 |
| Cost per day | $220 | $235 | $292 | $304 | $322 | $408 | $337 | $335 |
| Average length of stay | 135.9 days | 129.4 days | 158.3 days | 171.3 days | 231.1 days | 176.0 days | 358.0 days | 274.5 days |
Showing 2023–2021 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
33 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
3 · 9%
Medicaid
20 · 61%
Private pay & other
10 · 30%
Resident snapshot
60 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
0 · 0%
Medicaid
43 · 72%
Private pay & other
17 · 28%
Leaving
33 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
0 · 0%
Medicaid
24 · 73%
Private pay & other
9 · 27%
Mostly long-term care residents
Most residents stay for extended periods and receive ongoing daily care.
Places of interest near White Oak Manor Spartanburg
295 E Pearl St, Spartanburg, SC 29303-3666
Calculate Travel Distance to White Oak Manor Spartanburg
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around the area
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the SC Dept. of Public Health (DPH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
CCRC (Continuing Care Retirement Community):
A campus with multiple care levels so residents can age in place without moving.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The South Carolina average is: 60.8% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White Oak Manor Spartanburg | NH MC SNF | Spartanburg | 60
Facility
60
SC AVG
109
Rank
#105 / 133 | A+ |
97.7%
Facility
97.7%
SC AVG
89.7%
Rank
#3 / 87 | +9% | 4.83
Facility
4.83
SC AVG
4.12
Rank
#26 / 118 | +19% | +17% | $0
Facility
$0
SC AVG
$28.4k
Rank
#1 / 119 | 7
Facility
7
SC AVG
12.7
Rank
#28 / 116 | 2.3
Facility
2.3
SC AVG
3.4
Rank
#31 / 116 | - | 59 | - | - | Nhc Healthcare/Spartanburg LLC | $5.6M*Fiscal year ending 12/2023These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | $4.5M*Fiscal year ending 12/2023These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 80.4%*Fiscal year ending 12/2023These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 425024 | ||||
| Resorts at Beaufort | NH HOS MC PC RC SNF | Beaufort | 170
Facility
170
SC AVG
109
Rank
#15 / 133 | B+ |
77.1%
Facility
77.1%
SC AVG
89.7%
Rank
#80 / 87 | -14% | 4.00
Facility
4.00
SC AVG
4.12
Rank
#55 / 118 | -11% | -3% | $10.9k
Facility
$10.9k
SC AVG
$28.4k
Rank
#73 / 119 | 22
Facility
22
SC AVG
12.7
Rank
#103 / 116 | 4.4
Facility
4.4
SC AVG
3.4
Rank
#89 / 116 | 1 | 131 | - |
44
Facility
44
SC AVG
33
Rank
#16 / 46 | Resorts At Beaufort LLC | $11.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$11.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$13.4M
Rank
#52 / 104 | $6.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$6.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$7.9M
Rank
#59 / 104 | 56.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
56.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
60.8%
Rank
#59 / 104 | 425067 | ||||
| Myrtle Beach Manor | NH AL MC RC SNF | Myrtle Beach | 111
Facility
111
SC AVG
109
Rank
#64 / 133 | ? | - | - | 4.09
Facility
4.09
SC AVG
4.12
Rank
#50 / 118 | +48% | -1% | $27.8k
Facility
$27.8k
SC AVG
$28.4k
Rank
#102 / 119 | 11
Facility
11
SC AVG
12.7
Rank
#52 / 116 | 1.8
Facility
1.8
SC AVG
3.4
Rank
#14 / 116 | 3 | 39 | - |
41
Facility
41
SC AVG
33
Rank
#19 / 46 | Snh Sc Tenant LLC | $8.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$13.4M
Rank
#86 / 104 | $4.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$4.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$7.9M
Rank
#90 / 104 | 55.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
55.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
60.8%
Rank
#64 / 104 | 425070 | ||||
| Peachtree Centre | NH HOS RC SNF | Gaffney | 151
Facility
151
SC AVG
109
Rank
#20 / 133 | B |
88.5%
Facility
88.5%
SC AVG
89.7%
Rank
#66 / 87 | -1% | 3.09
Facility
3.09
SC AVG
4.12
Rank
#113 / 118 | -45% | -25% | $0
Facility
$0
SC AVG
$28.4k
Rank
#1 / 119 | 18
Facility
18
SC AVG
12.7
Rank
#93 / 116 | 6.0
Facility
6.0
SC AVG
3.4
Rank
#109 / 116 | - | 134 | - |
26
Facility
26
SC AVG
33
Rank
#28 / 46 | Peachtree Operating Group LLC | $13.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$13.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$13.4M
Rank
#39 / 104 | $5.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$7.9M
Rank
#76 / 104 | 41%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
41%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
60.8%
Rank
#101 / 104 | 425095 | ||||
| Brookdale Anderson | - | NH AL CCRC IL MC SNF | Anderson | 160
Facility
160
SC AVG
109
Rank
#17 / 133 | ? | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
43
Facility
43
SC AVG
33
Rank
#17 / 46 | $5.9M*Fiscal year ending 12/2022These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | $3.3M*Fiscal year ending 12/2022These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 56.1%*Fiscal year ending 12/2022These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 425398 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other SC nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about White Oak Manor Spartanburg
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Who is the owner of White Oak Manor Spartanburg?
White Oak Manor Spartanburg is legally operated by Nhc Healthcare/Spartanburg LLC, and administered by O Kent Cecil, III.
02 What is the license number of White Oak Manor Spartanburg?
According to SC state health department records, White Oak Manor Spartanburg's license number is NCF-1110.
03 What is the occupancy rate at White Oak Manor Spartanburg?
White Oak Manor Spartanburg's occupancy is 97.7%.
04 Are pets allowed at White Oak Manor Spartanburg?
No, White Oak Manor Spartanburg has a no-pet policy.
05 Does White Oak Manor Spartanburg operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
White Oak Manor Spartanburg is registered as a for-profit in SC.
06 Who is the administrator of White Oak Manor Spartanburg?
O Kent Cecil, III is the administrator of White Oak Manor Spartanburg.
07 What is the overall rating for White Oak Manor Spartanburg?
White Oak Manor Spartanburg received a 4-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
Updated on
