3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
An upscale senior living community in Phoenix, The Palazzo provides services for independent living, assisted living, memory care, and skilled nursing residents. The skilled nursing department of the senior living home keeps an open mind in the community, ensuring the highest level of support for the residents. The Palazzo understands the importance of meaningful relationships and the importance of family, which is why it highly practices a resident-centered approach to holistic wellness for seniors; where building new friendships and staying close to family is one of the top priorities of the management.
The upscale nursing homes provide state-of-the-art facilities that cater to short-term or long-term residents; they also are guaranteed to feel comfortable and know that they belong in a home that offers 24-hour nursing care with inpatient and outpatient care in a resort-like community with the utmost level of hospitality. The Palazzo boasts a team of in-house medical experts and rehabilitation specialists ready to assist and accommodate any necessary needs that may arise.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Daily nursing hours per resident by staff type, reported to CMS. Higher is generally better — compare this facility to state and national averages to see where staffing stands.
This home is ranked 47th out of 67 homes in Arizona for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
| Staff type | Hours / Day / Resident | vs state avg |
|---|---|---|
|
Registered Nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes.
| 31m per day | ▼ 27% State avg: 43m per day · National avg: 41m per day |
|
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care.
| 1h 12m per day | ▲ 14% State avg: 1h 3m per day · National avg: 52m per day |
|
Nurse Aide
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life.
| 2h 13m per day | ▼ 6% State avg: 2h 22m per day · National avg: 2h 21m per day |
|
Weekend Total Nursing
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
| 3h 28m per day | ▼ 4% State avg: 3h 38m per day · National avg: 3h 26m per day |
|
Physical Therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
| 9m per day | ▲ 49% State avg: 6m per day · National avg: 4m per day |
|
Weekend RN
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
| 32m per day | ■ Avg State avg: 31m per day · National avg: 29m per day |
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Higher than the Arizona average: 72.7%The Palazzo is administered by Charles B Kerby.
In Arizona, the Department of Health Services, Bureau of Long Term Care Licensing performs regular onsite inspections and investigates complaints for all licensed residential and nursing facilities.
A composite 0–100 score combining this facility's inspections, deficiencies, complaints, and enforcement actions relative to the Arizona state average. The score below shows how many points this facility sits above or below the typical Arizona nursing home score (the benchmark); higher is better.This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine score.
1 point above the Arizona average for nursing homes (82/100)
Rank #7 / 54 in Arizona Inspection Score — State benchmarked This home is ranked 7th out of 54 homes in Arizona for Inspection Score. Shows this facility's inspection score compared to the Arizona average among 54 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Facilities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings are based only on facilities in Arizona that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine score. Inspection score: 83 out of 100. Letter grade B. 1 point above the Arizona average for nursing homes (82/100)
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Arizona state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Deficiencies
| This Facility | AZ Average | vs. AZ Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 60 | 9 | This facility has 567% more total deficiencies than a typical Arizona nursing home (60 vs. AZ avg 9).↑ 567% worse Rank #33 / 38 Total deficiencies — State benchmarked This home is ranked 33rd out of 38 homes in Arizona for Deficiencies. Shows this facility's deficiencies compared to the Arizona average among 38 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Facilities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings are based only on facilities in Arizona that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking. |
|
Deficiencies per year
Average deficiencies per year since 2022.
| 15 | 2.3 | This facility has 552% more deficiencies per year than a typical Arizona nursing home (15 vs. AZ avg 2.3).↑ 552% worse |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
Average deficiencies per inspection.
| 12 | 1.8 | This facility has 567% more deficiencies per inspection than a typical Arizona nursing home (12 vs. AZ avg 1.8).↑ 567% worse Rank #36 / 38 Deficiencies per inspection — State benchmarked This home is ranked 36th out of 38 homes in Arizona for Deficiencies per inspection. Shows this facility's deficiencies per inspection compared to the Arizona average among 38 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Facilities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings are based only on facilities in Arizona that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking. |
|
Enforcement actions
Formal penalties or interventions imposed by Arizona regulators — directed plans of correction, civil monetary penalties, denial of payment, or appointment of temporary management.
| 0 | 0.9 | This facility has 100% fewer enforcement actions than a typical Arizona nursing home (0 vs. AZ avg 0.9).↓ 100% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | AZ Average | vs. AZ Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all routine and focused inspections. Excludes complaint investigations.
| 5 | 5 | This facility has total inspections in line with the Arizona average (5 vs. AZ avg 5).— At avg |
Complaints & Investigations
| This Facility | AZ Average | vs. AZ Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total complaints
Formal expressions of concern made by residents, families, or staff.
| 3 | 6 | This facility has 50% fewer total complaints than a typical Arizona nursing home (3 vs. AZ avg 6).↓ 50% better Rank #310 / 479 Total complaints — State benchmarked This home is ranked 310th out of 479 homes in Arizona for Complaint-related visits. Shows this facility's complaint-related visits compared to the Arizona average among 479 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Facilities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings are based only on facilities in Arizona that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking. |
|
Complaints per year
Average complaints per year since 2022.
| 0.8 | 1.5 | This facility has 47% fewer complaints per year than a typical Arizona nursing home (0.8 vs. AZ avg 1.5).↓ 47% better |
An editor-reviewed summary of the themes and findings across this facility's recent inspection reports.
Arizona average 6.3
Last Health inspection on Jun 2025
Arizona average 23.2
Arizona average 3.82
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
23 of 30 citations resulted from standard inspections; 5 of 30 resulted from complaint investigations; and 2 of 30 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
100% better than Arizona averageArizona average: 0.1
100% better than Arizona averageArizona average: 0.6
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Reporting period: October 1 – December 31, 2025 (Q4 2025). Source: CMS Payroll-Based Journal report.
42% more staff per resident than Arizona average
5% worse than Arizona average
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Manages medical care and health needs.
7 total: 6 full-time employees and 1 contractor.
7
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
9.4 hoursAssists with medical care and medications.
36 total: 18 full-time employees and 18 contractors.
36
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
11 hoursHelps with daily care and mobility.
83 total: 50 full-time employees and 33 contractors.
83
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
8.1 hours
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Total hours from contractors
689 contractor hours this quarter
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
| Certified Nursing Assistant | 50 | 33 | 83 | 11,055 | 92 | 100% | 8.1 |
| Licensed Practical Nurse | 18 | 18 | 36 | 4,990 | 92 | 100% | 11 |
| Registered Nurse | 6 | 1 | 7 | 1,683 | 90 | 98% | 9.4 |
| Dental Services Staff | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1,036 | 74 | 80% | 8 |
| RN Director of Nursing | 2 | 0 | 2 | 992 | 64 | 70% | 8 |
| Other Dietary Services Staff | 4 | 0 | 4 | 759 | 90 | 98% | 5.9 |
| Respiratory Therapy Technician | 3 | 0 | 3 | 742 | 72 | 78% | 6.1 |
| Physical Therapy Assistant | 4 | 0 | 4 | 618 | 75 | 82% | 5.4 |
| Administrator | 1 | 0 | 1 | 504 | 63 | 68% | 8 |
| Dietitian | 1 | 0 | 1 | 496 | 62 | 67% | 8 |
| Clinical Nurse Specialist | 2 | 0 | 2 | 460 | 55 | 60% | 7.8 |
| Nurse Practitioner | 1 | 0 | 1 | 456 | 57 | 62% | 8 |
| Qualified Social Worker | 1 | 0 | 1 | 97 | 50 | 54% | 1.9 |
| Physical Therapy Aide | 1 | 0 | 1 | 51 | 9 | 10% | 5.7 |
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials were reported in the last 3 years.
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
A composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and activities of daily living decline.
4.1
46% better than Arizona averageArizona average: 7.6
A composite score based on activities of daily living decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence.
9.7
40% better than Arizona averageArizona average: 16.1
CMS star rating based on long-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = significantly above average, 1 star = significantly below average.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.9%
47% better than Arizona averageArizona average: 11.2%
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
5.8%
64% better than Arizona averageArizona average: 15.8%
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
17.3%
17% better than Arizona averageArizona average: 20.8%
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.3%
105% worse than Arizona averageArizona average: 2.1%
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.2%
56% better than Arizona averageArizona average: 5.1%
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.2%
137% worse than Arizona averageArizona average: 1.3%
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.2%
60% better than Arizona averageArizona average: 5.4%
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.7%
84% better than Arizona averageArizona average: 4.5%
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
7.4%
28% better than Arizona averageArizona average: 10.3%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
97.5%
In line with Arizona averageArizona average: 97.2%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
88.1%
7% worse than Arizona averageArizona average: 94.6%
CMS star rating based on short-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = much above average, 1 star = much below average.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
89.4%
In line with Arizona averageArizona average: 91.5%
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.5%
50% better than Arizona averageArizona average: 1.0%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
78.6%
10% worse than Arizona averageArizona average: 87.3%
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
22.1%
10% better than Arizona averageArizona average: 24.6%
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
12.9%
21% worse than Arizona averageArizona average: 10.7%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
2.7%
251% worse than Arizona averageArizona average: 0.8%
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
43.8%
19% worse than Arizona averageArizona average: 53.7%
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
64.3%
27% better than Arizona averageArizona average: 50.6%
Quality measures are calculated from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. For most measures, lower percentages indicate better care quality.
18% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
61% of new residents, often for short stays.
22% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jan 2026)
Total residents
58Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Historical financial and operational data for The Palazzo from 2011–2023, based on CMS SNF Cost Reports.
Key figures below are for fiscal year ending in 12/2023.
Based on CMS SNF Cost Report for fiscal year ending in 12/2023.
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Money the home earns outside of resident care — such as investments, grants, rentals and other non-operating sources (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It is tracked separately from net patient revenue: it is not part of that figure, and it is not included in net patient income.
Staff salaries plus wage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement — from the home's own accounting records (CMS cost report, Worksheet A). Contract or agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs.
Rank #70 / 75Payroll — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 70th out of 75 homes in Arizona for Payroll. Shows total annual staff payroll benchmarked to the Arizona average. Higher payroll investment relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on cheaper contract labor.Facilities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings are based only on facilities in Arizona that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Payroll as a share of revenue: staff salaries and wage-related benefits divided by net patient revenue. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay.
Rank #15 / 75Payroll % — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 15th out of 75 homes in Arizona for Payroll %. Shows payroll as a percentage of revenue versus the Arizona average. Well-run Arizona facilities typically land around 59–71% — the top third Statewide. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings.Facilities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings are based only on facilities in Arizona that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Everything it costs to run the home apart from payroll — food, utilities, supplies, maintenance, contract labor and administration. Calculated as total operating expense minus payroll (staff salaries and wage-related benefits).
The home's total operating expense for the year — all the costs of running it, salaries included (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3).
Most residents stay long-term, while a smaller portion are admitted for short-term rehab.
Most new residents arrive under private pay (61% of admissions), and a typical private pay stay runs around 26 days.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
5.8 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Phoenix's city center to The Palazzo's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 3.43 miles to nearest hospital (HonorHealth John C. Lincoln Medical Center)
Add your location
The information below is reported by the Arizona Department of Health Services, Bureau of Long Term Care Licensing.
| Acacia Health Center at Sagewood | NH SNF | Phoenix (Desert Ridge West) | 78
Facility
78
AZ AVG
54
Rank
#168 / 528 |
96.2%
Facility
96.2%
AZ AVG
67.6
Rank
#7 / 63 | +42% | 5.51
Facility
5.51
AZ AVG
4.06
Rank
#6 / 67 | +50% | +36% | $0
Facility
$0
AZ AVG
$31.7k
Rank
#1 / 71 | - | 3
Facility
3
AZ AVG
23.2
Rank
#1 / 71 | 3.0
Facility
3.0
AZ AVG
3.8
Rank
#23 / 71 | - | 75 | A+ |
15
Facility
15
AZ AVG
37
Rank
#618 / 819 | Lcs Desert Ridge LLC | $15.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$15.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
$14.7M
Rank
#2 / 75 | $20.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$20.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
$6.4M
Rank
#3 / 75 | 131.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
131.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
48.1%
Rank
#67 / 75 | 35279 | ||||
| The Terraces of Phoenix | NH AL IL MC SNF | Phoenix (Camelback East Village) | 64
Facility
64
AZ AVG
54
Rank
#191 / 528 |
67.2%
Facility
67.2%
AZ AVG
67.6
Rank
#36 / 63 | -1% | 5.29
Facility
5.29
AZ AVG
4.06
Rank
#8 / 67 | +13% | +30% | $0
Facility
$0
AZ AVG
$31.7k
Rank
#1 / 71 | 69
Facility
69
AZ AVG
82
Rank
#40 / 54 | 13
Facility
13
AZ AVG
23.2
Rank
#22 / 71 | 2.6
Facility
2.6
AZ AVG
3.8
Rank
#18 / 71 | - | 43 | - |
62
Facility
62
AZ AVG
37
Rank
#130 / 819 | Humangood Arizona Inc | $26.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$26.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
$14.7M
Rank
#10 / 75 | $12.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$12.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
$6.4M
Rank
#9 / 75 | 46.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
46.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
48.1%
Rank
#54 / 75 | 35003 | ||||
| Christian Care Nursing Center | NH SNF | Phoenix (North Mountain Village) | 20
Facility
20
AZ AVG
54
Rank
#238 / 528 |
45.0%
Facility
45.0%
AZ AVG
67.6
Rank
#49 / 63 | -33% | - | +55% | - | $0
Facility
$0
AZ AVG
$31.7k
Rank
#1 / 71 | 82
Facility
82
AZ AVG
82
Rank
#9 / 54 | 10
Facility
10
AZ AVG
23.2
Rank
#11 / 71 | 3.3
Facility
3.3
AZ AVG
3.8
Rank
#28 / 71 | - | 9 | A+ |
50
Facility
50
AZ AVG
37
Rank
#255 / 819 | Christian Care Managment Inc | $1.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$1.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
$14.7M
Rank
#75 / 75 | $1.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$1.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
$6.4M
Rank
#75 / 75 | 88%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
88%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
48.1%
Rank
#35 / 75 | 35173 | ||||
| Desert Terrace Healthcare Center | NH MC SNF | Phoenix (Encanto Village) | 108
Facility
108
AZ AVG
54
Rank
#119 / 528 |
75.9%
Facility
75.9%
AZ AVG
67.6
Rank
#29 / 63 | +12% | 3.90
Facility
3.90
AZ AVG
4.06
Rank
#34 / 67 | -22% | -4% | $1.3k
Facility
$1.3k
AZ AVG
$31.7k
Rank
#52 / 71 | 67
Facility
67
AZ AVG
82
Rank
#41 / 54 | 24
Facility
24
AZ AVG
23.2
Rank
#39 / 71 | 3.4
Facility
3.4
AZ AVG
3.8
Rank
#32 / 71 | - | 82 | C+ |
67
Facility
67
AZ AVG
37
Rank
#75 / 819 | Bandera Healthcare LLC | $11.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$11.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
$14.7M
Rank
#54 / 75 | $6.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$6.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
$6.4M
Rank
#44 / 75 | 52.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
52.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
48.1%
Rank
#20 / 75 | 35014 | ||||
| The Palazzo | NH AL MC SNF | Phoenix (Leescroft) | 66
Facility
66
AZ AVG
54
Rank
#187 / 528 | - | - | 3.49
Facility
3.49
AZ AVG
4.06
Rank
#47 / 67 | -53% | -14% | $0
Facility
$0
AZ AVG
$31.7k
Rank
#1 / 71 | 83
Facility
83
AZ AVG
82
Rank
#7 / 54 | 30
Facility
30
AZ AVG
23.2
Rank
#50 / 71 | 10.0
Facility
10.0
AZ AVG
3.8
Rank
#70 / 71 | - | 69 | - |
68
Facility
68
AZ AVG
37
Rank
#66 / 819 | Lifehouse Investors V LLC | $4.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$4.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
$14.7M
Rank
#73 / 75 | $3.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$3.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
$6.4M
Rank
#70 / 75 | 78.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
78.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
48.1%
Rank
#15 / 75 | 35116 |
The Palazzo is located in Phoenix, Arizona.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Arizona.
The Palazzo is in the Leescroft neighborhood of Phoenix.
The Palazzo is legally operated by Aphz, LLC, and administered by Charles B Kerby.
The Palazzo has a walk score of 68. Moderately walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
According to AZ state health department records, The Palazzo's license number is AL13211C.
According to AZ state health department records, The Palazzo's license expires on September 25, 2026.
The Palazzo's occupancy is 100%.
No, The Palazzo has a no-pet policy.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
