Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
153
141 employees · 12 contractors · 61 on an average day The Reserve Healthcare and Rehabilitation
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · Hanahan, SC
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
The Reserve Healthcare and Rehabilitation
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · Hanahan, SC
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
The Reserve Healthcare and Rehabilitation accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Overview of The Reserve Healthcare and Rehabilitation
The Reserve Healthcare and Rehabilitation operates a 135-bed nursing home and skilled nursing center in Hanahan, South Carolina. Clinical care teams deliver ongoing medical support alongside on-site therapy services, allowing residents to complete rehabilitation programs directly inside the building.
Management falls under administrator Gregory, Jr. Hicks and operator Railroad Crossing Healthcare. Daily nurse staffing across the facility averages 3 hours and 22 minutes per resident. Financial coverage accommodates multiple payment pathways, including Medicare for post-hospital rehabilitative stays, Medicaid for longer stays, and private funds.
Families and their loved ones can reach out to The Reserve Healthcare and Rehabilitation to discuss admission requirements, review funding options, or book a guided tour of the facility.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 92nd out of 118 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 22m
This nursing home is ranked 92nd out of 118 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 22mStandout metric: RN, weekends is +11% above South Carolina average
4 of 6 metrics below South Carolina average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 19 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
19 staff · 9.4-hour shifts
35m
↓ 8% · SC 38mThis facility: 35m per resident per day, 8% below the South Carolina average of 38m (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 19 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
19 staff · 9.4-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 29 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
29 staff · 9.1-hour shifts
1h 6m
↑ 9% · SC 1h 1mThis facility: 1h 6m per resident per day, 9% above the South Carolina average of 1h 1m (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 29 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
29 staff · 9.1-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 69 total: 58 of the facility's own employees and 11 agency contractors.
69 staff · 9-hour shifts
1h 41m
↓ 24% · SC 2h 13mThis facility: 1h 41m per resident per day, 24% below the South Carolina average of 2h 13m (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 69 total: 58 of the facility's own employees and 11 agency contractors.
69 staff · 9-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 20m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 20m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
4m
↓ 10% · SC 5mThis facility: 4m per resident per day, 10% below the South Carolina average of 5m (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
2h 48m
↓ 16% · SC 3h 21mThis facility: 2h 48m per resident per day, 16% below the South Carolina average of 3h 21m (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
27m
↑ 11% · SC 24mThis facility: 27m per resident per day, 11% above the South Carolina average of 24m (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 28m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 28m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
153
141 employees · 12 contractors · 61 on an average day
153 total staff / 119 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.29 : 1
↓ 27% · SC 1.77This facility: 1.29 staff per resident, 27% below the South Carolina average of 1.77 (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
153 staff ÷ 119 residents
See full South Carolina ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8.5 h
↑ 8% · SC 7.9 hThis facility: 8.5 h, 8% above the South Carolina average of 7.9 h (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
47,425 staff hours this quarter
See full South Carolina ranking →99.7% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
South Carolina average: 89% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (11), Medical Director (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
135
Rank #27 / 133Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 27th out of 133 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other South Carolina facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
135
Rank #27 / 133Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 27th out of 133 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other South Carolina facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
Occupancy rate
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #40 / 87Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 40th out of 87 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the South Carolina average, with its Statewide rank out of 87. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #40 / 87Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 40th out of 87 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the South Carolina average, with its Statewide rank out of 87. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
92.6%
This home usually has limited availability
Based on 125 residents and 135 beds. Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Similar to the South Carolina average: 89.7%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
105
days
About This Community
Facility TypeHL- Nursing Home
StatusActive
CountyBerkeley
License NumberNCF-1097
Business TypeCorporation
CMS Certification Number425289
The Reserve Healthcare and Rehabilitation is legally operated by Railroad Crossing Healthcare Inc, and administered by Gregory Hicks, Jr.
Owner NameRailroad Crossing Healthcare Inc
Institutional Nursing Home
135 units
Total beds
135 units
Resident Council
Family Council
Pets not allowed
Inspection History
In South Carolina, the Department of Public Health, Bureau of Healthcare Quality conducts unannounced inspections to ensure care providers meet all health and safety codes.
ALM Inspection Grade Unavailable
Not publishedWe don't have enough verified data to publish an inspection grade for this facility — a missing grade reflects what we've been able to verify, not the facility's quality.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Oct 2023.
Total fines
$0
SC avg $28KSouth Carolina average: $28,139. Average among the 98 South Carolina facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
SC avg 2.03South Carolina average: 2.03. Average among the 98 South Carolina facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
SC avg 0.1South Carolina average: 0.1. Average among the 98 South Carolina facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the South Carolina average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 27% · SC 3.9This facility: 5.0, 27% above the SC average of 3.9 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
↑ 45% · SC 2.8This facility: 4.0, 45% above the SC average of 2.8 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
7.6
Score · lower is better
↑ 2% · SC 7.4This facility: 7.6, 2% above the SC average of 7.4 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
13.8
Score · lower is better
↑ 2% · SC 13.5This facility: 13.8, 2% above the SC average of 13.5 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 8 better, 5 worse
8 short-stay measures: 4 better, 1 near SC average, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
9.4%
↓ 19% · SC 11.6This facility: 9.4, 19% below the SC average of 11.6 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
9.4%
↓ 19% · SC 11.6This facility: 9.4, 19% below the SC average of 11.6 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
6.9%
↓ 42% · SC 11.8This facility: 6.9, 42% below the SC average of 11.8 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
6.9%
↓ 42% · SC 11.8This facility: 6.9, 42% below the SC average of 11.8 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
25.1%
↑ 55% · SC 16.2This facility: 25.1, 55% above the SC average of 16.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
25.1%
↑ 55% · SC 16.2This facility: 25.1, 55% above the SC average of 16.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.5%
↓ 57% · SC 1.2This facility: 0.5, 57% below the SC average of 1.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.5%
↓ 57% · SC 1.2This facility: 0.5, 57% below the SC average of 1.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.5%
↓ 84% · SC 3.2This facility: 0.5, 84% below the SC average of 3.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.5%
↓ 84% · SC 3.2This facility: 0.5, 84% below the SC average of 3.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
11.8%
↑ 139% · SC 4.9This facility: 11.8, 139% above the SC average of 4.9 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
11.8%
↑ 139% · SC 4.9This facility: 11.8, 139% above the SC average of 4.9 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.4%
↑ 54% · SC 6.1This facility: 9.4, 54% above the SC average of 6.1 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.4%
↑ 54% · SC 6.1This facility: 9.4, 54% above the SC average of 6.1 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.6%
↓ 18% · SC 3.2This facility: 2.6, 18% below the SC average of 3.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.6%
↓ 18% · SC 3.2This facility: 2.6, 18% below the SC average of 3.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
7.5%
↓ 51% · SC 15.4This facility: 7.5, 51% below the SC average of 15.4 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
7.5%
↓ 51% · SC 15.4This facility: 7.5, 51% below the SC average of 15.4 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
97.7%
↑ 6% · SC 91.8This facility: 97.7, 6% above the SC average of 91.8 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
97.7%
↑ 6% · SC 91.8This facility: 97.7, 6% above the SC average of 91.8 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
82.7%
↓ 11% · SC 92.5This facility: 82.7, 11% below the SC average of 92.5 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
82.7%
↓ 11% · SC 92.5This facility: 82.7, 11% below the SC average of 92.5 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.57
↑ 27% · SC 2.03This facility: 2.57, 27% above the SC average of 2.03 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.57
↑ 27% · SC 2.03This facility: 2.57, 27% above the SC average of 2.03 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.41
↓ 26% · SC 1.91This facility: 1.41, 26% below the SC average of 1.91 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.41
↓ 26% · SC 1.91This facility: 1.41, 26% below the SC average of 1.91 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
53.8%
≈ 0% · US 53.7This facility: 53.8, level with the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
53.8%
≈ 0% · US 53.7This facility: 53.8, level with the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
60.5%
↑ 20% · US 50.6This facility: 60.5, 20% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
60.5%
↑ 20% · US 50.6This facility: 60.5, 20% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.8%
↓ 1% · US 0.8This facility: 0.8, 1% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.8%
↓ 1% · US 0.8This facility: 0.8, 1% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · SC 1.4This facility: 0.0, 100% below the SC average of 1.4 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · SC 1.4This facility: 0.0, 100% below the SC average of 1.4 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
91.9%
↑ 12% · SC 81.9This facility: 91.9, 12% above the SC average of 81.9 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
91.9%
↑ 12% · SC 81.9This facility: 91.9, 12% above the SC average of 81.9 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
82.7%
↑ 5% · SC 79.0This facility: 82.7, 5% above the SC average of 79.0 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
82.7%
↑ 5% · SC 79.0This facility: 82.7, 5% above the SC average of 79.0 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
23.8%
↓ 4% · SC 24.7This facility: 23.8, 4% below the SC average of 24.7 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
23.8%
↓ 4% · SC 24.7This facility: 23.8, 4% below the SC average of 24.7 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
13.1%
↓ 7% · SC 14.1This facility: 13.1, 7% below the SC average of 14.1 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
13.1%
↓ 7% · SC 14.1This facility: 13.1, 7% below the SC average of 14.1 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
The Reserve Healthcare and Rehabilitation’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 104 South Carolina nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Breaking even on care
4.0% operating margin
+38.5 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 2 of the last 8 reported years. Net income $0.6M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Payroll in line with South Carolina homes
61.7% payroll share of revenue
SC average 60.8%Rank #28 / 104Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 28th out of 104 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the South Carolina average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $2.6M while revenue rose $5.2M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with South Carolina homes.
Revenue & profit
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2015 → 2024Trend | SC median | Compared with SC homesRank in SC | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $13.8M | +$5.2M | Trend 20152024 | SC median $11.8M | Rank in SC Rank #38 / 104Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 38th out of 104 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the South Carolina average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 64% of homes | Above SC median Higher net patient revenue than 64% of SC homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $13.2M | +$1.6M | Trend 20152024 | SC median $12.9M | Rank in SC Rank #48 / 104Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 48th out of 104 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other South Carolina homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 54% of homes | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $0.6M | +$3.5M | Trend 20152024 | SC median $0.1M | Rank in SC Rank #31 / 104Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 31st out of 104 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other South Carolina homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 71% of homes | Profit, growing Resident care made money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 4.0% | +38.5 pts | Trend 20152024 | SC median 1.2% | Rank in SC Rank #33 / 104Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 33rd out of 104 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other South Carolina homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 69% of homes | Thin margin A margin from 0% to 5% of revenue leaves little room for unexpected costs. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.0M | — | Trend — | SC median $0.1M | Rank in SC Rank #97 / 100Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 97th out of 100 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other South Carolina homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 3% of homes | Adds to profit Income from outside resident care, on top of the profit from care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $0.6M | +$3.5M | Trend — | SC median $0.3M | Rank in SC Rank #45 / 103Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 45th out of 103 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other South Carolina homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 57% of homes | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Staff spending in line with South Carolina homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2015 → 2024Trend | SC median | Compared with SC homesRank in SC | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $8.5M | +$2.6M | Trend 20152024 | SC median $7.4M | Rank in SC Rank #27 / 104Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 27th out of 104 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the South Carolina average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 75% of homes | Above SC median Higher payroll than 75% of SC homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 61.7% | −7.0 pts | Trend 20152024 | SC median 57.6% | Rank in SC Rank #28 / 104Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 28th out of 104 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the South Carolina average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 74% of homes | Near SC average The SC average is 60.8% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2015–2024 2 charts · SC benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income No report
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the South Carolina payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin SC payroll average No report
Year-by-year data, 2015–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021no report | 2022 | 2023no report | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $10.1M | $9.0M | $9.0M | $7.5M | $10.8M | $8.4M | $8.6M | $13.8M | ||
| Operating expenses | $10.1M | $11.0M | $11.8M | $12.0M | $13.1M | $10.2M | $11.6M | $13.2M | ||
| Net patient income | $0.0M | −$2.0M | −$2.8M | −$4.5M | −$2.2M | −$1.8M | −$3.0M | $0.6M | ||
| Operating margin | 0.0% | −22.0% | −31.3% | −60.4% | −20.4% | −21.4% | −34.5% | 4.0% | ||
| Net income | $0.0M | −$2.0M | −$2.8M | −$4.4M | −$2.1M | −$1.1M | −$3.0M | $0.6M | ||
| Payroll costs | $5.2M | $5.3M | $5.4M | $4.5M | $5.0M | $4.7M | $5.9M | $8.5M | ||
| Payroll share of revenue | 51.3% | 58.5% | 60.0% | 60.2% | 46.3% | 55.3% | 68.7% | 61.7% | ||
| Beds | 125 | 125 | 125 | 125 | 125 | 125 | 135 | 135 | ||
| Gross revenue | $15.3M | $15.3M | $13.7M | $11.4M | $12.9M | $11.2M | $9.0M | $15.7M | ||
| Salaries | $4.4M | $4.4M | $4.6M | $3.8M | $4.3M | $3.9M | $5.2M | $7.4M | ||
| Wage-related costs | $0.8M | $0.9M | $0.8M | $0.7M | $0.8M | $0.7M | $0.7M | $1.1M | ||
| Contract labor | $0.0M | $0.3M | $0.4M | $1.1M | $1.3M | $0.3M | — | $0.3M | ||
| Other operating costs | $4.9M | $5.7M | $6.4M | $7.5M | $8.0M | $5.6M | $5.7M | $4.7M | ||
| Net patient revenue per day | $324 | $284 | $277 | $262 | $356 | $311 | $293 | $354 | ||
| Cost per day | $324 | $346 | $363 | $420 | $429 | $378 | $394 | $339 | ||
| Average length of stay | 43.8 days | 41.9 days | 37.5 days | 41.3 days | 44.2 days | 57.6 days | 74.1 days | 105.3 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 7 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
409 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
130 · 32%
Medicaid
49 · 12%
Private pay & other
230 · 56%
Resident snapshot
119 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
5 · 4%
Medicaid
84 · 71%
Private pay & other
30 · 25%
Leaving
370 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
134 · 36%
Medicaid
32 · 9%
Private pay & other
204 · 55%
Mix of rehab and long-term care
This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.
Places of interest near The Reserve Healthcare and Rehabilitation
1800 Eagle Landing Blvd, Hanahan, SC 29410-8517
Calculate Travel Distance to The Reserve Healthcare and Rehabilitation
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around the area
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the SC Dept. of Public Health (DPH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The South Carolina average is: 60.8% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White Oak Manor Lancaster | NH SNF | Lancaster | 132
Facility
132
SC AVG
109
Rank
#29 / 133 |
91.3%
Facility
91.3%
SC AVG
89.7%
Rank
#55 / 87 | +2% | 4.32
Facility
4.32
SC AVG
4.12
Rank
#37 / 118 | -59% | +5% | $0
Facility
$0
SC AVG
$28.4k
Rank
#1 / 119 | 7
Facility
7
SC AVG
12.7
Rank
#28 / 116 | 2.3
Facility
2.3
SC AVG
3.4
Rank
#31 / 116 | - | 121 | - |
8
Facility
8
SC AVG
33
Rank
#39 / 46 | Nhc Healthcare/Lancaster LLC | $11.9M*Fiscal year ending 09/2023These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | $8.4M*Fiscal year ending 09/2023These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 71%*Fiscal year ending 09/2023These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 425017 | ||||
| Veterans Victory House | NH SNF | Walterboro | 220
Facility
220
SC AVG
109
Rank
#3 / 133 |
86.5%
Facility
86.5%
SC AVG
89.7%
Rank
#68 / 87 | -4% | 4.62
Facility
4.62
SC AVG
4.12
Rank
#31 / 118 | +50% | +12% | $0
Facility
$0
SC AVG
$28.4k
Rank
#1 / 119 | 4
Facility
4
SC AVG
12.7
Rank
#11 / 116 | 2.0
Facility
2.0
SC AVG
3.4
Rank
#15 / 116 | - | 190 | - | - | South Carolina Department Of Veterans Affairs | $22.8MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$22.8MFiscal year ending 06/2025
SC AVG
$13.4M
Rank
#12 / 104 | $12.7MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$12.7MFiscal year ending 06/2025
SC AVG
$7.9M
Rank
#7 / 104 | 55.8%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
55.8%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
SC AVG
60.8%
Rank
#63 / 104 | 425386 | ||||
| Rock Hill Post Acute Care Center | NH SNF | Rock Hill | 99
Facility
99
SC AVG
109
Rank
#74 / 133 |
86.3%
Facility
86.3%
SC AVG
89.7%
Rank
#69 / 87 | -4% | 3.77
Facility
3.77
SC AVG
4.12
Rank
#69 / 118 | -21% | -9% | $0
Facility
$0
SC AVG
$28.4k
Rank
#1 / 119 | 7
Facility
7
SC AVG
12.7
Rank
#28 / 116 | 2.3
Facility
2.3
SC AVG
3.4
Rank
#31 / 116 | - | 85 | - | - | Rock Hill Healthcare LLC | $11.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$11.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$13.4M
Rank
#54 / 104 | $6.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$6.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$7.9M
Rank
#58 / 104 | 58.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
58.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
60.8%
Rank
#43 / 104 | 425159 | ||||
| The Palms at Florence | NH RC SNF | Florence | 163
Facility
163
SC AVG
109
Rank
#16 / 133 |
94.4%
Facility
94.4%
SC AVG
89.7%
Rank
#23 / 87 | +5% | 4.16
Facility
4.16
SC AVG
4.12
Rank
#43 / 118 | -34% | +1% | $32.9k
Facility
$32.9k
SC AVG
$28.4k
Rank
#61 / 119 | 11
Facility
11
SC AVG
12.7
Rank
#44 / 116 | 3.7
Facility
3.7
SC AVG
3.4
Rank
#59 / 116 | 2 | 154 | - | - | Commander Operator LLC | $19.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$19.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$13.4M
Rank
#15 / 104 | $8.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$7.9M
Rank
#26 / 104 | 46%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
46%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
60.8%
Rank
#97 / 104 | 425119 | ||||
| The Reserve Healthcare and Rehabilitation | NH SNF | Hanahan | 135
Facility
135
SC AVG
109
Rank
#27 / 133 |
92.6%
Facility
92.6%
SC AVG
89.7%
Rank
#40 / 87 | +3% | 3.36
Facility
3.36
SC AVG
4.12
Rank
#92 / 118 | +35% | -18% | $0
Facility
$0
SC AVG
$28.4k
Rank
#1 / 119 | - | - | - | 125 | - | - | Railroad Crossing Healthcare Inc | $13.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$13.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$13.4M
Rank
#38 / 104 | $8.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$7.9M
Rank
#27 / 104 | 61.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
61.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
60.8%
Rank
#28 / 104 | 425289 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other SC nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about The Reserve Healthcare and Rehabilitation
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Who is the owner of The Reserve Healthcare and Rehabilitation?
The Reserve Healthcare and Rehabilitation is legally operated by Railroad Crossing Healthcare Inc, and administered by Gregory Hicks, Jr.
02 What is the license number of The Reserve Healthcare and Rehabilitation?
According to SC state health department records, The Reserve Healthcare and Rehabilitation's license number is NCF-1097.
03 What is the occupancy rate at The Reserve Healthcare and Rehabilitation?
The Reserve Healthcare and Rehabilitation's occupancy is 92.6%.
04 Are pets allowed at The Reserve Healthcare and Rehabilitation?
No, The Reserve Healthcare and Rehabilitation has a no-pet policy.
05 What is the best email address for The Reserve Healthcare and Rehabilitation?
The team at The Reserve Healthcare and Rehabilitation can be reached at contact-TheReserve@ensignservices.net.
06 Does The Reserve Healthcare and Rehabilitation operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
The Reserve Healthcare and Rehabilitation is registered as a for-profit in SC.
07 Who is the administrator of The Reserve Healthcare and Rehabilitation?
Gregory Hicks, Jr. is the administrator of The Reserve Healthcare and Rehabilitation.
Updated on
