Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
118
103 employees · 15 contractors · 42 on an average day Twin Oaks Convalescent Center
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · Alma, GA
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Twin Oaks Convalescent Center
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · Alma, GA
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Twin Oaks Convalescent Center is a nursing home and skilled nursing community in Alma, Georgia. Skilled nursing provides licensed nursing care on site around the clock, while the nursing home setting supports residents who need ongoing clinical care. The community has 88 beds and opened in 1975.
A dedicated rehabilitation unit provides transitional and short term care for someone who needs temporary skilled nursing and rehabilitation before returning to a less intensive setting. Family training and involvement gives relatives a role in understanding and supporting a resident’s care. Total nurse staffing is 4 hours and 12 minutes per resident per day, representing the daily hands on nursing time allocated to each resident. Ms. Sherry King serves as the administrator, and Twin Oaks Convalescent Center may be a good fit for someone who needs short term rehabilitation alongside skilled nursing care.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 19th out of 176 nursing homes we track in Georgia for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 12m
This nursing home is ranked 19th out of 176 nursing homes we track in Georgia for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 12mStandout metric: LPN / LVN is +50% above Georgia average
3 of 6 metrics below Georgia average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 8 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
8 staff · 8.2-hour shifts
43m
↑ 47% · GA 29mThis facility: 43m per resident per day, 47% above the Georgia average of 29m (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 8 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
8 staff · 8.2-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 30 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
30 staff · 8.8-hour shifts
1h 24m
↑ 50% · GA 56mThis facility: 1h 24m per resident per day, 50% above the Georgia average of 56m (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 30 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
30 staff · 8.8-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 50 total: 47 of the facility's own employees and 3 agency contractors.
50 staff · 8.6-hour shifts
2h 6m
↓ 3% · GA 2h 9mThis facility: 2h 6m per resident per day, 3% below the Georgia average of 2h 9m (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 50 total: 47 of the facility's own employees and 3 agency contractors.
50 staff · 8.6-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 20m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 20m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
1m
↓ 75% · GA 3mThis facility: 1m per resident per day, 75% below the Georgia average of 3m (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
3h 27m
↑ 11% · GA 3h 6mThis facility: 3h 27m per resident per day, 11% above the Georgia average of 3h 6m (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
10m
↓ 52% · GA 20mThis facility: 10m per resident per day, 52% below the Georgia average of 20m (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 28m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 28m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
118
103 employees · 15 contractors · 42 on an average day
118 total staff / 68 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.74 : 1
↑ 25% · GA 1.39This facility: 1.74 staff per resident, 25% above the Georgia average of 1.39 (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
118 staff ÷ 68 residents
See full Georgia ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8 h
↓ 4% · GA 8.3 hThis facility: 8 h, 4% below the Georgia average of 8.3 h (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
30,818 staff hours this quarter
See full Georgia ranking →93.8% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Georgia average: 94.2% · Contractors this quarter: Speech Language Pathologist (4), Certified Nursing Assistant (3), Respiratory Therapy Technician (3), Qualified Social Worker (2), Occupational Therapy Aide (1), Physical Therapy Assistant (1), Physical Therapy Aide (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
88
Rank #141 / 216Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 141st out of 216 nursing homes we track in Georgia for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Georgia facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
88
Rank #141 / 216Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 141st out of 216 nursing homes we track in Georgia for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Georgia facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Years of operating
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #42 / 197Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 42nd out of 197 nursing homes we track in Georgia for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Georgia facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #42 / 197Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 42nd out of 197 nursing homes we track in Georgia for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Georgia facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
49
years
Walk Score
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #57 / 220Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 57th out of 220 nursing homes we track in Georgia for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Georgia facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #57 / 220Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 57th out of 220 nursing homes we track in Georgia for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Georgia facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
63
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #88 / 162Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 88th out of 162 nursing homes we track in Georgia for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Georgia average, with its Statewide rank out of 162. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #88 / 162Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 88th out of 162 nursing homes we track in Georgia for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Georgia average, with its Statewide rank out of 162. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
83%
This home usually has availability
Based on 73 residents and 88 beds. Source: state inspection report (Jun 2025)
Similar to the Georgia average: 80.7%About This Community
Facility TypeNursing Home
StatusSnf/Nf Dual Cert
IssuanceJanuary 18, 1977
CountyBacon
Twin Oaks Convalescent Center is administered by Ms. Sherry King.
Short-Term Rehab
Email
sking@bchsi.org
Pets not allowed
This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ. Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file — covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification surveys.
Inspection History
In Georgia, the Department of Community Health, Healthcare Facility Regulation Division conducts unannounced inspections to ensure facilities adhere to state health and safety requirements.
Since 2017 · 9 years of data
These figures come from state-published data and the state inspection reports we hold on file. The period covered can vary depending on document availability.
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 37 deficiencies 33 inspections
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 37 deficiencies 33 inspections
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Georgia state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Since 2017 vs. Georgia state average
Overall vs. GA average
1 Worse
Metrics worse than Georgia average:
• Total deficiencies (48% above) 1 Better Metrics better than Georgia average:
• Deficiencies per inspection (15% below)
• Total deficiencies (48% above) 1 Better Metrics better than Georgia average:
• Deficiencies per inspection (15% below)
Deficiencies
| This Facility | GA Average | vs. GA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 37 | 25.0 | This facility has 48% more total deficiencies than a typical Georgia nursing home (37 vs. GA avg 25).↑ 48% worse |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
Average deficiencies per inspection.
| 1.1 | 1.3 | This facility has 15% fewer deficiencies per inspection than a typical Georgia nursing home (1.1 vs. GA avg 1.3).↓ 15% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | GA Average | vs. GA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 33 | 16.0 | This facility has had 106% more total inspections than the Georgia average (33 vs. GA avg 16). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 106% more |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Total health inspections
1
↓ 71% · GA 3.5This facility: 1, 71% below the GA average of 3.5 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
2
Rank #2 / 179Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 2nd out of 179 nursing homes we track in Georgia for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Georgia State average, with a ranking across all 179 GA facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 88% · GA 17This facility: 2, 88% below the GA average of 17 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
2
Rank #13 / 179Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 13th out of 179 nursing homes we track in Georgia for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Georgia mean across 179 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 58% · GA 4.76This facility: 2, 58% below the GA average of 4.76 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
2 of 2 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · GA 0.6This facility: 0, 100% below the GA average of 0.6 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · GA 0.5This facility: 0, 100% below the GA average of 0.5 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
2
↓ 87% · GA 15.8This facility: 2, 87% below the GA average of 15.8 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · GA 0.1This facility: 0, 100% below the GA average of 0.1 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Mar 28, 2025 · 2 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Infection Control, 1 of 2 citations · 2 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Mar 28, 2025
2 citations
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 2 citations
Infection Control
1 deficiency (50%)
Environmental
1 deficiency (50%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
All 2 citations resulted from standard inspections.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials were reported in the last 3 years.
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Georgia average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
3
/ 5
Average
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
2
/ 5
Below average
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
8.5
Score · lower is better
↓ 4% · GA 8.9This facility: 8.5, 4% below the GA average of 8.9 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
13.0
Score · lower is better
↓ 15% · GA 15.4This facility: 13.0, 15% below the GA average of 15.4 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 8 better, 5 worse
8 short-stay measures: 2 better, 3 worse, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
11.9%
↓ 22% · GA 15.3This facility: 11.9, 22% below the GA average of 15.3 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
11.9%
↓ 22% · GA 15.3This facility: 11.9, 22% below the GA average of 15.3 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
14.2%
↓ 7% · GA 15.2This facility: 14.2, 7% below the GA average of 15.2 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
14.2%
↓ 7% · GA 15.2This facility: 14.2, 7% below the GA average of 15.2 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
13.1%
↓ 17% · GA 15.8This facility: 13.1, 17% below the GA average of 15.8 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
13.1%
↓ 17% · GA 15.8This facility: 13.1, 17% below the GA average of 15.8 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.7%
↑ 50% · GA 2.5This facility: 3.7, 50% above the GA average of 2.5 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.7%
↑ 50% · GA 2.5This facility: 3.7, 50% above the GA average of 2.5 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.6%
↑ 43% · GA 3.2This facility: 4.6, 43% above the GA average of 3.2 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.6%
↑ 43% · GA 3.2This facility: 4.6, 43% above the GA average of 3.2 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.4%
↓ 22% · GA 5.6This facility: 4.4, 22% below the GA average of 5.6 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.4%
↓ 22% · GA 5.6This facility: 4.4, 22% below the GA average of 5.6 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.6%
↑ 37% · GA 5.6This facility: 7.6, 37% above the GA average of 5.6 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.6%
↑ 37% · GA 5.6This facility: 7.6, 37% above the GA average of 5.6 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.3%
↓ 53% · GA 11.3This facility: 5.3, 53% below the GA average of 11.3 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.3%
↓ 53% · GA 11.3This facility: 5.3, 53% below the GA average of 11.3 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
9.0%
↓ 55% · GA 19.9This facility: 9.0, 55% below the GA average of 19.9 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
9.0%
↓ 55% · GA 19.9This facility: 9.0, 55% below the GA average of 19.9 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 9% · GA 91.4This facility: 100.0, 9% above the GA average of 91.4 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 9% · GA 91.4This facility: 100.0, 9% above the GA average of 91.4 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 5% · GA 95.0This facility: 100.0, 5% above the GA average of 95.0 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 5% · GA 95.0This facility: 100.0, 5% above the GA average of 95.0 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.37
↑ 9% · GA 2.18This facility: 2.37, 9% above the GA average of 2.18 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.37
↑ 9% · GA 2.18This facility: 2.37, 9% above the GA average of 2.18 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
5.15
↑ 161% · GA 1.97This facility: 5.15, 161% above the GA average of 1.97 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
5.15
↑ 161% · GA 1.97This facility: 5.15, 161% above the GA average of 1.97 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
56.8%
↑ 6% · US 53.7This facility: 56.8, 6% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
56.8%
↑ 6% · US 53.7This facility: 56.8, 6% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
50.1%
↓ 1% · US 50.6This facility: 50.1, 1% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
50.1%
↓ 1% · US 50.6This facility: 50.1, 1% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
4.6%
↑ 74% · GA 2.6This facility: 4.6, 74% above the GA average of 2.6 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
4.6%
↑ 74% · GA 2.6This facility: 4.6, 74% above the GA average of 2.6 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.0%
↑ 23% · GA 80.3This facility: 99.0, 23% above the GA average of 80.3 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.0%
↑ 23% · GA 80.3This facility: 99.0, 23% above the GA average of 80.3 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.1%
↑ 21% · GA 78.4This facility: 95.1, 21% above the GA average of 78.4 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.1%
↑ 21% · GA 78.4This facility: 95.1, 21% above the GA average of 78.4 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
30.2%
↑ 25% · GA 24.2This facility: 30.2, 25% above the GA average of 24.2 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
30.2%
↑ 25% · GA 24.2This facility: 30.2, 25% above the GA average of 24.2 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
13.6%
↑ 11% · GA 12.2This facility: 13.6, 11% above the GA average of 12.2 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
13.6%
↑ 11% · GA 12.2This facility: 13.6, 11% above the GA average of 12.2 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Facility Characteristics
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jun 2026)
Total residents
68
Medicare
3
4.4% of residents
Medicaid
62
91.2% of residents
Private pay or other
3
4.4% of residents
Programs & Services
Residents Group
Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Family Member Group
Family members meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Nurse Aide Training
State-approved Nurse Aide Training and Competency Evaluation Program on-site
Active Family Council
Organized group of family members that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, resident care, and activities.
Active Resident Council
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Places of interest near Twin Oaks Convalescent Center
0.0 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Alma's city center to Twin Oaks Convalescent Center's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Twin Oaks Convalescent Center
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around the area
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the GA Dept. of Community Health (DCH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Georgia average is: 54.8% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The William Breman Jewish Home | NH SNF | Atlanta (Buckhead) | 96
Facility
96
GA AVG
112
Rank
#129 / 216 |
96.9%
Facility
96.9%
GA AVG
80.7%
Rank
#8 / 162 | +20% | 4.97
Facility
4.97
GA AVG
3.55
Rank
#10 / 176 | +14% | +40% | $0
Facility
$0
GA AVG
$40.6k
Rank
#1 / 181 | 7
Facility
7
GA AVG
17.0
Rank
#22 / 179 | 2.3
Facility
2.3
GA AVG
4.8
Rank
#17 / 179 | - | 93 | A+ |
23
Facility
23
GA AVG
45
Rank
#173 / 220 | Jeffrey Gopen | $14.2MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$14.2MFiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
$12.9M
Rank
#54 / 167 | $8.8MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$8.8MFiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
$5.7M
Rank
#19 / 167 | 62.2%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
62.2%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
54.8%
Rank
#12 / 167 | 115022 | ||||
| Salude – the Art of Recovery | NH SNF | Suwanee | 64
Facility
64
GA AVG
112
Rank
#177 / 216 |
79.7%
Facility
79.7%
GA AVG
80.7%
Rank
#103 / 162 | -1% | 3.89
Facility
3.89
GA AVG
3.55
Rank
#29 / 176 | -25% | +10% | $0
Facility
$0
GA AVG
$40.6k
Rank
#1 / 181 | 1
Facility
1
GA AVG
17.0
Rank
#1 / 179 | 1.0
Facility
1.0
GA AVG
4.8
Rank
#1 / 179 | - | 51 | - |
43
Facility
43
GA AVG
45
Rank
#129 / 220 | Macondray Lane LP | $14.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$14.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
GA AVG
$12.9M
Rank
#52 / 167 | $5.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
GA AVG
$5.7M
Rank
#82 / 167 | 39.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
39.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
GA AVG
54.8%
Rank
#148 / 167 | 115723 | ||||
| Cedar Valley Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | NH MC SNF | Cedartown | 100
Facility
100
GA AVG
112
Rank
#104 / 216 |
78.0%
Facility
78.0%
GA AVG
80.7%
Rank
#108 / 162 | -3% | 3.76
Facility
3.76
GA AVG
3.55
Rank
#41 / 176 | +3% | +6% | $0
Facility
$0
GA AVG
$40.6k
Rank
#1 / 181 | 3
Facility
3
GA AVG
17.0
Rank
#6 / 179 | 1.0
Facility
1.0
GA AVG
4.8
Rank
#1 / 179 | - | 78 | - |
63
Facility
63
GA AVG
45
Rank
#57 / 220 | Rhonda Blankenship | $7.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
GA AVG
$12.9M
Rank
#122 / 167 | $2.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$2.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
GA AVG
$5.7M
Rank
#159 / 167 | 31.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
31.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
GA AVG
54.8%
Rank
#154 / 167 | 115436 | ||||
| Magnolia Manor of Marion County | NH AL IL MC SNF | Buena Vista | 70
Facility
70
GA AVG
112
Rank
#168 / 216 |
82.9%
Facility
82.9%
GA AVG
80.7%
Rank
#90 / 162 | +3% | 5.01
Facility
5.01
GA AVG
3.55
Rank
#10 / 176 | +15% | +41% | $0
Facility
$0
GA AVG
$40.6k
Rank
#1 / 181 | 14
Facility
14
GA AVG
17.0
Rank
#73 / 179 | 4.7
Facility
4.7
GA AVG
4.8
Rank
#90 / 179 | - | 58 | - |
50
Facility
50
GA AVG
45
Rank
#106 / 220 | Angela Watkins | $6.9MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$6.9MFiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
$12.9M
Rank
#142 / 167 | $4.4MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$4.4MFiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
$5.7M
Rank
#113 / 167 | 64.5%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
64.5%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
54.8%
Rank
#14 / 167 | 115599 | ||||
| Twin Oaks Convalescent Center | NH SNF | Alma | 88
Facility
88
GA AVG
112
Rank
#141 / 216 |
83.0%
Facility
83.0%
GA AVG
80.7%
Rank
#88 / 162 | +3% | 4.20
Facility
4.20
GA AVG
3.55
Rank
#19 / 176 | -22% | +19% | $0
Facility
$0
GA AVG
$40.6k
Rank
#1 / 181 | 2
Facility
2
GA AVG
17.0
Rank
#2 / 179 | 2.0
Facility
2.0
GA AVG
4.8
Rank
#13 / 179 | - | 73 | - |
63
Facility
63
GA AVG
45
Rank
#57 / 220 | - | - | - | - | 115513 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other GA nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Frequently Asked Questions about Twin Oaks Convalescent Center
Is Twin Oaks Convalescent Center in a walkable area?
Twin Oaks Convalescent Center has a walk score of 63. Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
What is the occupancy rate at Twin Oaks Convalescent Center?
Twin Oaks Convalescent Center's occupancy is 83%.
How long has Twin Oaks Convalescent Center been in business?
Twin Oaks Convalescent Center has been operating for approximately 49 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
Are pets allowed at Twin Oaks Convalescent Center?
No, Twin Oaks Convalescent Center has a no-pet policy.
What is the best email address for Twin Oaks Convalescent Center?
The team at Twin Oaks Convalescent Center can be reached at sking@bchsi.org.
Does Twin Oaks Convalescent Center operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Twin Oaks Convalescent Center is registered as a non-profit in GA.
Who is the administrator of Twin Oaks Convalescent Center?
Ms. Sherry King is the administrator of Twin Oaks Convalescent Center.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Updated on
