Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
76
60 employees · 16 contractors · 23 on an average day Vi at Silverstone
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Continuing Care Retirement Community, Independent Living, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Scottsdale, AZ
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Vi at Silverstone
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Continuing Care Retirement Community, Independent Living, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Scottsdale, AZ
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Vi at Silverstone accepts Medicare and private pay.
Operating since 2011, VI at Silverstone in Scottsdale, AZ, offers independent living, assisted living, memory care, and skilled nursing. With several care options offered, the community can accommodate older adults whose needs could grow over time.
The home has 24 beds, placing it in the smaller community range where staff and residents can get to know one another. It is currently at 83% occupancy, with 20 beds occupied. Additionally, housing options include a villa, one-bedroom residences, and two-bedroom residences. This housing option may suit couples planning to stay together.
Staffing totals 6 hours and 16 minutes of nurse time per resident each day, representing the daily nursing time allocated per resident. Medicare and private pay are accepted, although Medicare applies to short-term skilled care after a hospital stay rather than long-term residence, while private pay means the family or resident pays directly.
Located in the North Scottsdale neighborhood, its Walk Score is 43 out of 100, making it a car-dependent setting where most errands require a car or a ride. The community’s transportation services may also benefit a resident who no longer drives and would generally need transportation for errands. Pets are also allowed so that residents may keep a small animal companion.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 4th out of 59 nursing homes we track in Arizona for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
6h 16m
This nursing home is ranked 4th out of 59 nursing homes we track in Arizona for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
6h 16mStandout metric: RN, weekends is +222% above Arizona average
1 of 6 metrics below Arizona average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 14 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
14 staff · 8.3-hour shifts
1h 54m
↑ 162% · AZ 43mThis facility: 1h 54m per resident per day, 162% above the Arizona average of 43m (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 14 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
14 staff · 8.3-hour shiftsUS average: 43m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 43m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 5 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
5 staff · 7.8-hour shifts
51m
↓ 19% · AZ 1h 2mThis facility: 51m per resident per day, 19% below the Arizona average of 1h 2m (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 5 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
5 staff · 7.8-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 28 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
28 staff · 7.1-hour shifts
3h 32m
↑ 52% · AZ 2h 19mThis facility: 3h 32m per resident per day, 52% above the Arizona average of 2h 19m (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 28 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
28 staff · 7.1-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 26m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
7m
↑ 22% · AZ 6mThis facility: 7m per resident per day, 22% above the Arizona average of 6m (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
5h 16m
↑ 46% · AZ 3h 36mThis facility: 5h 16m per resident per day, 46% above the Arizona average of 3h 36m (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 32m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 32m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
1h 42m
↑ 222% · AZ 32mThis facility: 1h 42m per resident per day, 222% above the Arizona average of 32m (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
76
60 employees · 16 contractors · 23 on an average day
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
6.9 h
↓ 19% · AZ 8.5 hThis facility: 6.9 h, 19% below the Arizona average of 8.5 h (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
14,534 staff hours this quarter
See full Arizona ranking →90% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Arizona average: 94.4% · Contractors this quarter: Respiratory Therapy Technician (4), Physical Therapy Aide (3), Qualified Social Worker (3), Physical Therapy Assistant (2), Speech Language Pathologist (2), Occupational Therapy Aide (1), Medical Director (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
40
Rank #62 / 80Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 62nd out of 80 nursing homes we track in Arizona for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Arizona facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
40
Rank #62 / 80Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 62nd out of 80 nursing homes we track in Arizona for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Arizona facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Years of operating
A community with a solid operating history and experience delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #27 / 53Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 27th out of 53 nursing homes we track in Arizona for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Arizona facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A community with a solid operating history and experience delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #27 / 53Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 27th out of 53 nursing homes we track in Arizona for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Arizona facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
15
years
Walk Score
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #36 / 82Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 36th out of 82 nursing homes we track in Arizona for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Arizona facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #36 / 82Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 36th out of 82 nursing homes we track in Arizona for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Arizona facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
43
/ 100
Residents per day (avg)
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
21
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
76
days
About This Community
StatusActive
IssuanceNovember 24, 2010
ExpirationOctober 31, 2026 Expires today
License NumberAL8222C
CMS Certification Number035281
QualificationHealth Care
Vista 360 Well-Being — Vi LivingA branded program developed by this community's operator or its partners - a named approach to programming or care, rather than an independent external certification.
Vi at Silverstone is legally operated by VI At Silverstone, A VI And Plaza Companies Community, and administered by Andrew Quinn.
OwnerCc/Pdr Silverstone, L.l.c.
Valet Service
Landscaping
On-Site Care Center
Housekeeping
ConciergeListed as: 24-hour concierge
MaintenanceListed as: Building maintenance
TransportationListed as: Scheduled transportation
Pets AllowedWeight limit 30 lbs.
Dog Park
Movie Theater
Library
Swimming Pool
Beauty Salon
Spa
Fitness Center
18-Hole Putting Course
Fireplace
Guest Rooms
On-Site Garage with Valet Parking
Private Dining Room
Activities
Water Aerobics
Group Exercise Classes (Dance Cardio, Yoga)
Book Club
Curated Local Outings
Cooking Demonstrations
Wine Education and Guided Tastings
University Lectures
Personal Training
Dining & Nutrition
Sourced directly from the team at Vi at Silverstone.
Dining & Nutrition
Sourced directly from the team at Vi at Silverstone.- Private dining room for family events.
- Bistro / café on site.
- Multiple dining venues.
- Outdoor dining option.
Building TypeMid-rise
1 Bedroom Floor plans as listed by the community: Amalfi (912 sq ft) · Amalfi A (947 sq ft) · Capri (957 sq ft) · Pisa (1,097 sq ft)
Floor plans: Amalfi, Amalfi A, Capri, Pisa
912–1,097 sq ft
1 Bedroom + Den Floor plans as listed by the community: Roma (1,168 sq ft) · Parma (1,279 sq ft)
Floor plans: Roma, Parma
1,168–1,279 sq ft
2 Bedroom Floor plans as listed by the community: Napoli (1,365 sq ft) · Firenza (1,491 sq ft) · Firenza A (1,516 sq ft) · Portofino (1,601 sq ft)
Floor plans: Napoli, Firenza, Firenza A, Portofino
1,365–1,601 sq ft
2 Bedroom + Den Floor plans as listed by the community: Genoa (1,605 sq ft) · Siena (1,742 sq ft) · Venezia (1,794 sq ft) · Verona (1,815 sq ft) · Positano (2,076 sq ft) · Milano (2,162 sq ft) · Ravello (2,250 sq ft)
Floor plans: Genoa, Siena, Venezia, Verona, Positano +2 more
1,605–2,250 sq ft
Cottage / Villa
This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ. Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file — covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification surveys.
Inspection History
In Arizona, the Department of Health Services, Bureau of Long Term Care Licensing performs regular onsite inspections and investigates complaints for all licensed residential and nursing facilities.
The figures below cover inspections recorded between February 20, 2025 and July 8, 2025.
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Arizona state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Overall vs. AZ average
0 Worse
No metrics in this bucket.
1 Better
Metrics better than Arizona average:
• Total deficiencies (100% below)
• Total deficiencies (100% below)
Deficiencies
| This Facility | AZ Average | vs. AZ Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 0 | 10.0 | This facility has 100% fewer total deficiencies than a typical Arizona nursing home (0 vs. AZ avg 10).↓ 100% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | AZ Average | vs. AZ Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 2 | 5.0 | This facility has had 60% fewer total inspections than the Arizona average (2 vs. AZ avg 5). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 60% fewer |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Total health inspections
4
↓ 39% · AZ 6.6This facility: 4, 39% below the Arizona average of 6.6 (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
17
Rank #27 / 61Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 27th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Arizona for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Arizona State average, with a ranking across all 61 AZ facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 22% · AZ 21.7This facility: 17, 22% below the Arizona average of 21.7 (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
4.25
Rank #47 / 61Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 47th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Arizona for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Arizona mean across 61 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 22% · AZ 3.49This facility: 4.25, 22% above the Arizona average of 3.49 (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
17 of 17 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · AZ 0.1This facility: 0, 100% below the Arizona average of 0.1 (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · AZ 0.5This facility: 0, 100% below the Arizona average of 0.5 (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
17
↓ 19% · AZ 21This facility: 17, 19% below the Arizona average of 21 (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · AZ 0.1This facility: 0, 100% below the Arizona average of 0.1 (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: May 28, 2026 · 12 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Resident Assessment & Care Planning, 4 of 17 citations · 7 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
May 28, 2026
12 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 13, 2025
3 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 29, 2023
1 citation
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Aug 02, 2023
1 citation
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 17 citations
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
4 deficiencies (24%)
Infection Control
3 deficiencies (18%)
Quality of Life & Care
3 deficiencies (18%)
Administration
2 deficiencies (12%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
2 deficiencies (12%)
Pharmacy Services
2 deficiencies (12%)
Resident Rights
1 deficiency (6%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
15 of 17 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 1 of 17 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Aug 2023.
Total fines
$0
AZ avg $31KArizona average: $31,098. Average among the 39 Arizona facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
AZ avg 1.72Arizona average: 1.72. Average among the 39 Arizona facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
AZ avg 0.13Arizona average: 0.13. Average among the 39 Arizona facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Arizona average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
4.3
Score · lower is better
↓ 37% · AZ 6.8This facility: 4.3, 37% below the AZ average of 6.8 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
16.7
Score · lower is better
↑ 12% · AZ 14.9This facility: 16.7, 12% above the AZ average of 14.9 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.9 long-stay measures: 5 better, 3 worse, 1 near AZ average
3 short-stay measures: 3 better
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 9 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
8.7%
↓ 19% · AZ 10.7This facility: 8.7, 19% below the AZ average of 10.7 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
8.7%
↓ 19% · AZ 10.7This facility: 8.7, 19% below the AZ average of 10.7 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
24.6%
↑ 19% · AZ 20.6This facility: 24.6, 19% above the AZ average of 20.6 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
24.6%
↑ 19% · AZ 20.6This facility: 24.6, 19% above the AZ average of 20.6 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.0%
↑ 152% · AZ 1.2This facility: 3.0, 152% above the AZ average of 1.2 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.0%
↑ 152% · AZ 1.2This facility: 3.0, 152% above the AZ average of 1.2 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.5%
↓ 31% · AZ 2.1This facility: 1.5, 31% below the AZ average of 2.1 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.5%
↓ 31% · AZ 2.1This facility: 1.5, 31% below the AZ average of 2.1 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
0.8%
↓ 82% · AZ 4.4This facility: 0.8, 82% below the AZ average of 4.4 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
0.8%
↓ 82% · AZ 4.4This facility: 0.8, 82% below the AZ average of 4.4 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.3%
↑ 18% · AZ 5.3This facility: 6.3, 18% above the AZ average of 5.3 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.3%
↑ 18% · AZ 5.3This facility: 6.3, 18% above the AZ average of 5.3 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · AZ 3.9This facility: 0.0, 100% below the AZ average of 3.9 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · AZ 3.9This facility: 0.0, 100% below the AZ average of 3.9 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
4.4%
↓ 58% · AZ 10.6This facility: 4.4, 58% below the AZ average of 10.6 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
4.4%
↓ 58% · AZ 10.6This facility: 4.4, 58% below the AZ average of 10.6 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 3% · AZ 96.9This facility: 100.0, 3% above the AZ average of 96.9 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 3% · AZ 96.9This facility: 100.0, 3% above the AZ average of 96.9 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 3 measures
Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · AZ 1.2This facility: 0.0, 100% below the AZ average of 1.2 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · AZ 1.2This facility: 0.0, 100% below the AZ average of 1.2 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.3%
↑ 8% · AZ 91.8This facility: 99.3, 8% above the AZ average of 91.8 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.3%
↑ 8% · AZ 91.8This facility: 99.3, 8% above the AZ average of 91.8 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.0%
↑ 10% · AZ 87.3This facility: 96.0, 10% above the AZ average of 87.3 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.0%
↑ 10% · AZ 87.3This facility: 96.0, 10% above the AZ average of 87.3 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Vi at Silverstone’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 61 Arizona nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−215.5% operating margin
+2.0 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 8 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($33.0M) turns it into a net profit to $2.1M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends more on payroll than most Arizona homes
111.2% payroll share of revenue
AZ average 63.3%Rank #5 / 61Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 5th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Arizona for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Arizona average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.3M while revenue rose $0.2M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Arizona homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | AZ median | Compared with AZ homesRank in AZ | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $5.3M | +$0.2M | Trend 20172024 | AZ median $13.7M | Rank in AZ Rank #57 / 61Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 57th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Arizona for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Arizona average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 7% of homes | Below AZ median Higher net patient revenue than 7% of AZ homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $16.6M | +$0.6M | Trend 20172024 | AZ median — | Rank in AZ Not ranked | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$11.3M | −$0.4M | Trend 20172024 | AZ median — | Rank in AZ Not ranked | Loss, widening Resident care lost money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −215.5% | +2.0 pts | Trend 20172024 | AZ median — | Rank in AZ Not ranked | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $33.0M | — | Trend — | AZ median — | Rank in AZ Not ranked | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $2.1M | +$0.2M | Trend — | AZ median — | Rank in AZ Not ranked | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends more of revenue on staff than most Arizona homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | AZ median | Compared with AZ homesRank in AZ | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $5.9M | +$0.3M | Trend 20172024 | AZ median $7.5M | Rank in AZ Rank #46 / 61Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 46th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Arizona for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Arizona average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 25% of homes | Below AZ median Higher payroll than 25% of AZ homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 111.2% | +1.6 pts | Trend 20172024 | AZ median 55.2% | Rank in AZ Rank #5 / 61Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 5th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Arizona for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Arizona average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 93% of homes | 47.9 pts over AZ average The AZ average is 63.3% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · AZ benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Arizona payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin AZ payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $5.4M | $5.3M | $4.7M | $4.0M | $4.1M | $4.2M | $5.0M | $5.3M |
| Operating expenses | $14.5M | $13.5M | $14.1M | $14.7M | $14.7M | $15.3M | $16.0M | $16.6M |
| Net patient income | −$9.1M | −$8.2M | −$9.4M | −$10.7M | −$10.6M | −$11.0M | −$11.0M | −$11.3M |
| Operating margin | −170.3% | −153.6% | −201.9% | −265.4% | −261.4% | −262.0% | −217.5% | −215.5% |
| Net income | −$3.8M | −$2.4M | $3.0M | $1.9M | $3.2M | $0.6M | $1.9M | $2.1M |
| Payroll costs | $4.0M | $4.3M | $4.3M | $4.7M | $4.7M | $4.8M | $5.5M | $5.9M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 75.0% | 81.6% | 91.8% | 117.6% | 114.5% | 114.9% | 109.6% | 111.2% |
| Beds | 60 | 60 | 60 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 24 |
| Gross revenue | $6.9M | $6.9M | $6.3M | $5.6M | $6.0M | $6.2M | $7.4M | $7.5M |
| Salaries | $3.4M | $3.7M | $3.6M | $4.1M | $3.9M | $4.1M | $4.7M | $5.0M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.7M | $0.7M | $0.7M | $0.7M | $0.7M | $0.7M | $0.8M | $0.9M |
| Contract labor | $0.9M | $0.8M | $1.3M | $0.5M | $0.5M | $0.8M | $0.8M | $0.8M |
| Other operating costs | $10.5M | $9.2M | $9.8M | $10.0M | $10.1M | $10.4M | $10.5M | $10.8M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $711 | $710 | $757 | $650 | $644 | $627 | $686 | $718 |
| Cost per day | $1,923 | $1,800 | $2,286 | $2,373 | $2,326 | $2,268 | $2,177 | $2,265 |
| Average length of stay | 83.7 days | 63.4 days | 61.9 days | 88.5 days | 87.8 days | 72.3 days | 66.2 days | 76.4 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Arriving
95 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
70 · 74%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
25 · 26%
Leaving
96 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
60 · 63%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
36 · 38%
Mostly short-term rehab stays
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Places of interest near Vi at Silverstone
23005 N 74Th St, Scottsdale, AZ 85255 — 1.67 miles to nearest hospital (HonorHealth Scottsdale Thompson Peak Medical Center)
Calculate Travel Distance to Vi at Silverstone
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Scottsdale
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the AZ Dept. of Health Services (ADHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
CCRC (Continuing Care Retirement Community):
A campus with multiple care levels so residents can age in place without moving.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Arizona average is: 63.3% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plaza Healthcare | NH SNF | Scottsdale (South Scottsdale) | 179
Facility
179
AZ AVG
100
Rank
#13 / 80 |
74.0%
Facility
74.0%
AZ AVG
73.3%
Rank
#29 / 56 | +1% | 3.44
Facility
3.44
AZ AVG
4.08
Rank
#42 / 59 | +109% | -16% | $0
Facility
$0
AZ AVG
$31.1k
Rank
#1 / 61 | 7
Facility
7
AZ AVG
21.7
Rank
#9 / 61 | 2.3
Facility
2.3
AZ AVG
3.5
Rank
#14 / 61 | - | 132 | - |
59
Facility
59
AZ AVG
42
Rank
#18 / 82 | Plaza Hc Holding Company, LLC | $30.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$30.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
$15.9M
Rank
#5 / 61 | $22.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$22.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#3 / 61 | 74.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
74.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
63.3%
Rank
#9 / 61 | 035084 | ||||
| Life Care Center of Scottsdale | NH SNF | Scottsdale (Central Scottsdale) | 132
Facility
132
AZ AVG
100
Rank
#18 / 80 |
44.9%
Facility
44.9%
AZ AVG
73.3%
Rank
#56 / 56 | -39% | 3.66
Facility
3.66
AZ AVG
4.08
Rank
#25 / 59 | -39% | -10% | $6.4k
Facility
$6.4k
AZ AVG
$31.1k
Rank
#51 / 61 | 15
Facility
15
AZ AVG
21.7
Rank
#24 / 61 | 3.0
Facility
3.0
AZ AVG
3.5
Rank
#26 / 61 | 1 | 59 | - |
38
Facility
38
AZ AVG
42
Rank
#44 / 82 | Cove Associates, LLC | $5.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
$15.9M
Rank
#55 / 61 | $3.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$3.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#56 / 61 | 70.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
70.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
63.3%
Rank
#12 / 61 | 035143 | ||||
| Vi at Grayhawk | NH AL CCRC IL MC SNF | Scottsdale (Grayhawk) | 84
Facility
84
AZ AVG
100
Rank
#44 / 80 | - | - | 4.93
Facility
4.93
AZ AVG
4.08
Rank
#10 / 59 | -6% | +21% | $0
Facility
$0
AZ AVG
$31.1k
Rank
#1 / 61 | 2
Facility
2
AZ AVG
21.7
Rank
#1 / 61 | 1.0
Facility
1.0
AZ AVG
3.5
Rank
#1 / 61 | - | 34 | A+ |
8
Facility
8
AZ AVG
42
Rank
#77 / 82 | Cc/Pdr-Scottsdale, L.l.c | $7.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
$15.9M
Rank
#52 / 61 | $6.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$6.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#38 / 61 | 86.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
86.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
63.3%
Rank
#7 / 61 | 035272 | ||||
| Vi at Silverstone | NH AL CCRC IL MC SNF | Scottsdale (North Scottsdale) | 40
Facility
40
AZ AVG
100
Rank
#62 / 80 | - | - | 6.27
Facility
6.27
AZ AVG
4.08
Rank
#4 / 59 | +84% | +54% | $0
Facility
$0
AZ AVG
$31.1k
Rank
#1 / 61 | 17
Facility
17
AZ AVG
21.7
Rank
#27 / 61 | 4.3
Facility
4.3
AZ AVG
3.5
Rank
#47 / 61 | - | 21 | - |
43
Facility
43
AZ AVG
42
Rank
#36 / 82 | Cc/Pdr Silverstone, L.l.c | $5.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
$15.9M
Rank
#57 / 61 | $5.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#46 / 61 | 111.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
111.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
63.3%
Rank
#5 / 61 | 035281 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other AZ nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 4 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Arizona
Vi at Silverstone is located in Scottsdale, Arizona.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Arizona.
Frequently Asked Questions about Vi at Silverstone
What neighborhood is Vi at Silverstone in?
Vi at Silverstone is in the North Scottsdale neighborhood of Scottsdale.
Who is the owner of Vi at Silverstone?
Vi at Silverstone is legally operated by VI At Silverstone, A VI And Plaza Companies Community, and administered by Andrew Quinn.
Is Vi at Silverstone in a walkable area?
Vi at Silverstone has a walk score of 43. Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
What is the license number of Vi at Silverstone?
According to AZ state health department records, Vi at Silverstone's license number is AL8222C.
When does Vi at Silverstone's license expire?
According to AZ state health department records, Vi at Silverstone's license expires on October 31, 2026.
What is the occupancy rate at Vi at Silverstone?
Vi at Silverstone's occupancy is 83.5%.
How long has Vi at Silverstone been in business?
Vi at Silverstone has been operating for approximately 15 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Updated on
