(888) 927-9409
Call
(888) 927-9409
A Dream Villa
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Residential Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Sherwood Forest, CA
Exterior view of a assisted living facility Modern kitchen interior in a senior living facility Bright, spacious lounge area with comfortable seating Bright common area with comfortable seating and decor Cozy private resident room with modern decor Clean and modern bathroom with accessible features Outdoor seating area with a patio couch and coffee table

A Dream Villa

Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Residential Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Sherwood Forest, CA
17304 Parthenia St, Sherwood Forest, CA 91325 View map Calculator: See prices in your area
Calculator: See prices in your area

Overview of A Dream Villa

A Dream Villa Inc. is a passionate residential care community in Sherwood Forest, CA, that offers comprehensive care options. Dedicated to older adults’ welfare, the community promotes a healing environment where they can maintain their independence while receiving exceptional care. Light housekeeping, recreational activities, and personal care are also offered to ensure a maintenance-free living. The community strongly adheres to professional and compassionate care for residents’ welfare.

Light exercises, shopping, and many more leisure activities accompany residents, promoting an active lifestyle and social interactions. With its wide range of services, including non-medical transportation and special diet and meals, residents receive the utmost care for their unique needs. Local amenities and commercial establishments in Sherwood Forest also surround the area, ensuring accessibility and convenience. This residential care community is a good choice for older adults in California seeking high-quality care for a blissful retirement.

Facility Direct Line (747) 256-2025
Facility Direct Line (747) 256-2025

Capacity and availability

Residents per day
5
Bed community size
6-bed community Rank #1318 / 1645Bed count — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 1318th out of 1,645 homes we track in California for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other California facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in California that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
Years in operation
4 years in operation Rank #1129 / 1507Years in operation — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 1129th out of 1,507 homes we track in California for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other California facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in California that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
An established community with some operational experience and growing routines.
Walk Score
Walk Score: 38 / 100 Rank #1582 / 2057Walk Score — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 1582nd out of 2,057 homes we track in California for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across California facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in California that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Somewhat walkable. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.

About this community

Occupancy

Occupancy rate
83%
Rank #504 / 1452Occupancy rate — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 504th out of 1,452 homes we track in California for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the California average, with its Statewide rank out of 1452. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in California that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Higher than the California average: 72.8%
Occupied beds
5 / 6
Average occupied beds in California homes 87 beds

License Details

Facility TypeResidential Care Elderly
IssuanceJuly 29, 2022
CountyLos Angeles

Ownership & Operating Entity

A Dream Villa is legally operated by A Dream Villa, Inc., and administered by Azniv Ter-Arsenyan.

Contact A Dream Villa

Inspection History

In California, the Department of Social Services (for assisted living facilities) and the Department of Public Health (for nursing homes) conduct inspections to ensure resident safety and regulatory compliance.

Inspection Scorecard Info This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the California state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.

Overall vs. CA average 0 Worse No metrics in this bucket. 1 Better Metrics better than California average:
• Total citations (100% below)

Citations Info Citations are formal regulatory issues recorded during state inspections.

This FacilityCA Averagevs. CA Avg
Total citations Info Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types. 012 This facility has 100% fewer total citations than a typical California nursing home (0 vs. CA avg 12).↓ 100% better

Inspections & Visits Info State inspections evaluate whether the facility meets health and safety standards.

This FacilityCA Averagevs. CA Avg
Total inspections Info Combined count of official scheduled inspections, complaint visits and other regulatory visits. California counts each evaluation report, so one trip can count twice when it serves two purposes. 516 This facility has had 69% fewer total inspections than the California average (5 vs. CA avg 16). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 69% fewer
Complaint visits Info On-site visits triggered by formal complaints filed by residents, families, or staff. 013 This facility has had 100% fewer complaint visits than the California average (0 vs. CA avg 13). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 100% fewer Rank #1 / 1387 Complaint visits — State benchmarked This home is ranked 1st out of 1,387 homes we track in California for # of complaint visits. Shows this facility's # of complaint visits compared to the California average among 1387 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in California that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Other visits Info Regulatory visits that are neither routine inspections nor complaint investigations — administrative check-ins, follow-up reviews, licensing-related visits. 27 This facility has had 71% fewer other visits than the California average (2 vs. CA avg 7). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 71% fewer
Official inspections Info Routine, scheduled inspections conducted by state regulators to evaluate whether the facility meets federal and state standards. 34 This facility has had 25% fewer official inspections than the California average (3 vs. CA avg 4). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 25% fewer
Show Inspection Reports

This home is administered by Azniv Ter-Arsenyan.

What does this home offer?

Pets allowed icon
Pets allowed icon

No pets allowed

Housing options icon
Housing options icon

Housing Options: Private Rooms

Building type icon
Building type icon

Building Type: Single-story

Personal care icon
Personal care icon

Personal Care Assistance

Companionship icon
Companionship icon

Companionship

Meal Preparation icon

Meal Preparation

Light housekeeping icon
Light housekeeping icon

Light Housekeeping

Grocery Shopping and Errands icon

Grocery Shopping and Errands

Social and recreational activities icon
Social and recreational activities icon

Social and Recreational Activities

Places of interest near A Dream Villa

Address 17304 Parthenia St, Sherwood Forest, CA 91325

Calculate Travel Distance to A Dream Villa

Add your location

Address

Compare Nursing Homes around the area

Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the CA Dept. of Social Services (CDSS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.

Communities are listed from highest to lowest based on our ranking methodology.

The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
Care Types in This Table AL (Assisted Living): Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing. NH (Nursing Home): 24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs. SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility): Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness. MC (Memory Care): Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia. IL (Independent Living): Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care. HOS (Hospice Care): Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The California average is: 61.2% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
Vi at Palo Alto ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
NH
AL
IL
MC
SNF
Palo Alto
876
Facility 876
CA AVG 103
Rank #1 / 1,645
73.1%
Facility 73.1%
CA AVG 75.9%
Rank #852 / 1,452
-4%
5.53
Facility 5.53
CA AVG 4.22
Rank #16 / 288
 ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ +28%+31%
$0
Facility $0
CA AVG $56.5k
Rank #1 / 293
18
Facility 18
CA AVG 50.2
Rank #27 / 290
3.0
Facility 3.0
CA AVG 4.6
Rank #53 / 290
1640-
80
Facility 80
CA AVG 58
Rank #416 / 2,057
Cary Maslow
$15.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility $15.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG $15.7M
Rank #116 / 259
$10.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility $10.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG $9.0M
Rank #73 / 259
70.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility 70.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG 61.2%
Rank #32 / 259
555835
Baywood Court ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
NH
AL
HOS
IL
SNF
Castro Valley
72
Facility 72
CA AVG 103
Rank #976 / 1,645
72.2%
Facility 72.2%
CA AVG 75.9%
Rank #873 / 1,452
-5%
5.41
Facility 5.41
CA AVG 4.22
Rank #21 / 288
 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ -15%+28%
$0
Facility $0
CA AVG $56.5k
Rank #1 / 293
12
Facility 12
CA AVG 50.2
Rank #8 / 290
4.0
Facility 4.0
CA AVG 4.6
Rank #140 / 290
-52A+
25
Facility 25
CA AVG 58
Rank #1,782 / 2,057
Baywood Court
$10.6MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility $10.6MFiscal year ending 06/2024
CA AVG $15.7M
Rank #186 / 259
$13.2MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility $13.2MFiscal year ending 06/2024
CA AVG $9.0M
Rank #36 / 259
124.7%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility 124.7%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
CA AVG 61.2%
Rank #10 / 259
555855
Canterbury Woods ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
NH
AL
IL
SNF
Pacific Grove
190
Facility 190
CA AVG 103
Rank #179 / 1,645
72.6%
Facility 72.6%
CA AVG 75.9%
Rank #868 / 1,452
-4%
6.10
Facility 6.10
CA AVG 4.22
Rank #7 / 288
 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ +10%+44%
$0
Facility $0
CA AVG $56.5k
Rank #1 / 293
26
Facility 26
CA AVG 50.2
Rank #71 / 290
8.7
Facility 8.7
CA AVG 4.6
Rank #281 / 290
-138A+
81
Facility 81
CA AVG 58
Rank #383 / 2,057
Shaida Behnam
$3.2MFiscal year ending 03/2024
Facility $3.2MFiscal year ending 03/2024
CA AVG $15.7M
Rank #258 / 259
$5.7MFiscal year ending 03/2024
Facility $5.7MFiscal year ending 03/2024
CA AVG $9.0M
Rank #198 / 259
176.7%Fiscal year ending 03/2024
Facility 176.7%Fiscal year ending 03/2024
CA AVG 61.2%
Rank #5 / 259
55303
Webster House ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
NH
AL
IL
SNF
Palo Alto (Crescent Park)
54
Facility 54
CA AVG 103
Rank #1,115 / 1,645
90.7%
Facility 90.7%
CA AVG 75.9%
Rank #320 / 1,452
+20%
5.52
Facility 5.52
CA AVG 4.22
Rank #16 / 288
 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ +21%+31%
$0
Facility $0
CA AVG $56.5k
Rank #1 / 293
23
Facility 23
CA AVG 50.2
Rank #52 / 290
5.8
Facility 5.8
CA AVG 4.6
Rank #238 / 290
-49-
90
Facility 90
CA AVG 58
Rank #171 / 2,057
Elvyra Abare
$10.2MFiscal year ending 03/2024
Facility $10.2MFiscal year ending 03/2024
CA AVG $15.7M
Rank #197 / 259
$7.8MFiscal year ending 03/2024
Facility $7.8MFiscal year ending 03/2024
CA AVG $9.0M
Rank #144 / 259
76.2%Fiscal year ending 03/2024
Facility 76.2%Fiscal year ending 03/2024
CA AVG 61.2%
Rank #22 / 259
555156
Nursing Home Explorer

Frequently Asked Questions about A Dream Villa

What neighborhood is A Dream Villa in?

A Dream Villa is in the Northridge neighborhood of Sherwood Forest.

Is A Dream Villa in a walkable area?

A Dream Villa has a walk score of 38. Somewhat walkable. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.

What is the occupancy rate at A Dream Villa?

A Dream Villa's occupancy is 83%.

How long has A Dream Villa been in business?

A Dream Villa has been operating for approximately 4 years, based on available licensing and registration records.

Are pets allowed at A Dream Villa?

No, A Dream Villa has a no-pet policy.

Who is the administrator of A Dream Villa?

Azniv Ter-Arsenyan is the administrator of A Dream Villa.

How many beds does A Dream Villa have?

A Dream Villa has 6 beds.

Guides for Better Senior Living

Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area

Nursing Home Data Explorer

Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now

The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It

Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance

Updated on
Pricing
More
More Actions
Contact Contact Map Book a Tour Let's Chat