Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
208
98 employees · 110 contractors · 42 on an average day Amethyst Health of Brown Deer
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · Milwaukee, WI
ALM Inspection Grade
D
ALM's inspection grade is 63 / 100, a D — 18 points below the Wisconsin average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 63 / 100, a D — 18 points below the Wisconsin average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Amethyst Health of Brown Deer
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · Milwaukee, WI
ALM Inspection Grade
D
ALM's inspection grade is 63 / 100, a D — 18 points below the Wisconsin average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 63 / 100, a D — 18 points below the Wisconsin average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Amethyst Health of Brown Deer accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Amethyst Health of Brown Deer provides skilled nursing and nursing home care in Milwaukee, WI. Skilled nursing includes licensed nursing care on site around the clock, which can suit someone who needs ongoing clinical support. The community may be a good fit for a resident whose care needs require this level of nursing oversight.
There are 87 beds. Rehabilitation services are available within the care setting, so residents can receive rehabilitation without moving elsewhere for that part of their care. Transportation to appointments helps residents attend scheduled medical visits, and a salon provides salon services without requiring them to leave the community.
Payment options include Medicare for short term skilled care after a hospital stay, Medicaid for eligible residents whose savings may not cover a long stay, and private pay for families paying directly. Jensen Patrick serves as the administrator. Brown Deer Health Opco operates the community.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 98th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 54m
This nursing home is ranked 98th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 54mStandout metric: LPN / LVN is +45% above Wisconsin average
4 of 6 metrics below Wisconsin average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 39 total: 6 of the facility's own employees and 33 agency contractors.
39 staff · 8-hour shifts
34m
↓ 45% · WI 1h 1mThis facility: 34m per resident per day, 45% below the Wisconsin average of 1h 1m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 39 total: 6 of the facility's own employees and 33 agency contractors.
39 staff · 8-hour shiftsUS average: 42m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 42m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 46 total: 20 of the facility's own employees and 26 agency contractors.
46 staff · 9.1-hour shifts
57m
↑ 45% · WI 39mThis facility: 57m per resident per day, 45% above the Wisconsin average of 39m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 46 total: 20 of the facility's own employees and 26 agency contractors.
46 staff · 9.1-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 85 total: 42 of the facility's own employees and 43 agency contractors.
85 staff · 7.6-hour shifts
2h 24m
↓ 11% · WI 2h 42mThis facility: 2h 24m per resident per day, 11% below the Wisconsin average of 2h 42m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 85 total: 42 of the facility's own employees and 43 agency contractors.
85 staff · 7.6-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 26m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
5m
↑ 28% · WI 4mThis facility: 5m per resident per day, 28% above the Wisconsin average of 4m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
3h 39m
↓ 5% · WI 3h 51mThis facility: 3h 39m per resident per day, 5% below the Wisconsin average of 3h 51m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 32m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 32m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
28m
↓ 30% · WI 40mThis facility: 28m per resident per day, 30% below the Wisconsin average of 40m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
208
98 employees · 110 contractors · 42 on an average day
208 total staff / 63 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
3.30 : 1
↑ 37% · WI 2.40This facility: 3.30 staff per resident, 37% above the Wisconsin average of 2.40 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
208 staff ÷ 63 residents
See full Wisconsin ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.7 h
↑ 5% · WI 7.3 hThis facility: 7.7 h, 5% above the Wisconsin average of 7.3 h (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
29,319 staff hours this quarter
See full Wisconsin ranking →88% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Wisconsin average: 88.4% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (43), Registered Nurse (33), Licensed Practical Nurse (26), Qualified Activities Professional (3), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1), Occupational Therapy Aide (1), Medical Director (1), Clinical Nurse Specialist (1), Nurse Practitioner (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
87
Rank #76 / 197Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 76th out of 197 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Wisconsin facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
87
Rank #76 / 197Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 76th out of 197 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Wisconsin facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Walk Score
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #146 / 191Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 146th out of 191 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Wisconsin facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #146 / 191Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 146th out of 191 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Wisconsin facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
28
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #118 / 167Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 118th out of 167 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Wisconsin average, with its Statewide rank out of 167. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #118 / 167Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 118th out of 167 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Wisconsin average, with its Statewide rank out of 167. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
65.3%
This home usually has availability
Based on 56.8 residents and 87 beds. Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Lower than the Wisconsin average: 72.1%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
216
days
About This Community
Facility TypeSkilled Care
CountyMilwaukee
CMS Certification Number525498
Certification TypeTitle 18 SNF Title 19 NF
Amethyst Health of Brown Deer is administered by Jensen Patrick.
Owner NameBrown Deer Health Opco LLC
Profit StatusFor-profit
Resident Council
Short-Term Rehabilitation
Physical Therapy
Occupational Therapy
Speech Therapy
Wound CareCare for wounds such as pressure sores, surgical wounds, or ulcers, including assessment, dressing changes, and monitoring for infection.
IV Therapy
Subacute Care
Daily Living Assistance
Housekeeping
TransportationListed as: Transportation to appointments
Fax(414) 371-7548
Pets not allowed
Beauty Salon
Touring HoursMonday-Friday: 9 AM - 4 PM
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
63 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
18 points below the Wisconsin average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Concern
397 severity-weighted points (86 deficiencies) · 5× higher than the typical CMS-certified WI facility (median: 76)
Enforcement
Concern
$415,206 in fines · 7 enforcement actions
Persistence
Typical
27 days to fix issues · about the same as the typical CMS-certified WI facility (median: 27)
Total health inspections
10
↑ 61% · WI 6.2This facility: 10, 61% above the Wisconsin average of 6.2 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
86
Rank #161 / 168Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 161st out of 168 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Wisconsin State average, with a ranking across all 168 WI facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 204% · WI 28.3This facility: 86, 204% above the Wisconsin average of 28.3 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
8.6
Rank #165 / 168Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 165th out of 168 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Wisconsin mean across 168 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 103% · WI 4.24This facility: 8.6, 103% above the Wisconsin average of 4.24 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
86 of 86 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
3
↑ 233% · WI 0.9This facility: 3, 233% above the Wisconsin average of 0.9 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
4
↑ 233% · WI 1.2This facility: 4, 233% above the Wisconsin average of 1.2 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
77
↑ 198% · WI 25.8This facility: 77, 198% above the Wisconsin average of 25.8 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
2
↑ 300% · WI 0.5This facility: 2, 300% above the Wisconsin average of 0.5 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: May 20, 2026 · 4 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 33 of 86 citations · 10 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
May 20, 2026
4 citations
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 14, 2026
4 citations
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Feb 26, 2026
26 citations
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Feb 17, 2026
13 citations
Quality of Care critical citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care critical citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Dec 05, 2025
1 citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 29, 2025
1 citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 17, 2025
1 citation
Quality of Care critical citation
Corrected
Corrected
Showing the 50 most recent of 86 citations.
Top deficiency categories
Share of 86 citations
Quality of Life & Care
33 deficiencies (38%)
Pharmacy Services
12 deficiencies (14%)
Infection Control
8 deficiencies (9%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
8 deficiencies (9%)
Administration
7 deficiencies (8%)
Nursing & Physician Services
6 deficiencies (7%)
Resident Rights
5 deficiencies (6%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
4 deficiencies (5%)
Nutrition & Dietary
2 deficiencies (2%)
Environmental
1 deficiency (1%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
43 of 86 citations resulted from standard inspections; 37 of 86 resulted from complaint investigations; and 6 of 86 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
5 penalties in the past 3 years
Latest: Feb 17, 2026 · $138,450 civil money penalty
Feb 17, 2026 · $138,450 civil money penalty
Mar 17, 2025 · $176,345 civil money penalty
Oct 30, 2024 · $16,346 civil money penalty
Feb 17, 2026 · 71-day payment denial
Oct 30, 2024 · 10-day payment denial
Total fines
$331,141
↑ 210% · WI $107KThis facility: $331,141, 210% above the Wisconsin average of $106,807. Average among the 146 Wisconsin facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #161 / 168Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 161st out of 168 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Wisconsin average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 168 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
3
↑ 48% · WI 2.03This facility: 3, 48% above the Wisconsin average of 2.03. Average among the 146 Wisconsin facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
2
81 days
↑ 183% · WI 0.71This facility: 2, 183% above the Wisconsin average of 0.71. Average among the 146 Wisconsin facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Feb 17, 2026
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$138,450
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$138,450
Feb 17, 2026
Payment denial
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
New admissions not paid
71 days
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
New admissions not paid
71 days
Mar 17, 2025
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$176,345
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$176,345
Oct 30, 2024
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$16,346
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$16,346
Oct 30, 2024
Payment denial
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
New admissions not paid
10 days
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
New admissions not paid
10 daysFine amount comparison
This facility
$331,141
Wisconsin average
$106,807
US average
$66,281
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Wisconsin and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Wisconsin average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
2
/ 5
Below average
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
9.1
Score · lower is better
↑ 1% · WI 9.0This facility: 9.1, 1% above the WI average of 9.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
16.1
Score · lower is better
↓ 15% · WI 18.9This facility: 16.1, 15% below the WI average of 18.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 7 better, 2 worse, 2 near WI average
3 short-stay measures: 1 worse, 2 near WI average
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
15.0%
↓ 5% · WI 15.8This facility: 15.0, 5% below the WI average of 15.8 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
15.0%
↓ 5% · WI 15.8This facility: 15.0, 5% below the WI average of 15.8 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
18.0%
↑ 6% · WI 17.0This facility: 18.0, 6% above the WI average of 17.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
18.0%
↑ 6% · WI 17.0This facility: 18.0, 6% above the WI average of 17.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
15.4%
↓ 35% · WI 23.6This facility: 15.4, 35% below the WI average of 23.6 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
15.4%
↓ 35% · WI 23.6This facility: 15.4, 35% below the WI average of 23.6 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.0%
↓ 64% · WI 2.7This facility: 1.0, 64% below the WI average of 2.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.0%
↓ 64% · WI 2.7This facility: 1.0, 64% below the WI average of 2.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.9%
↓ 43% · WI 3.3This facility: 1.9, 43% below the WI average of 3.3 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.9%
↓ 43% · WI 3.3This facility: 1.9, 43% below the WI average of 3.3 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.0%
↑ 1% · WI 4.9This facility: 5.0, 1% above the WI average of 4.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.0%
↑ 1% · WI 4.9This facility: 5.0, 1% above the WI average of 4.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.5%
↑ 12% · WI 4.9This facility: 5.5, 12% above the WI average of 4.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.5%
↑ 12% · WI 4.9This facility: 5.5, 12% above the WI average of 4.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.1%
↓ 48% · WI 6.0This facility: 3.1, 48% below the WI average of 6.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.1%
↓ 48% · WI 6.0This facility: 3.1, 48% below the WI average of 6.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
11.3%
↓ 29% · WI 15.9This facility: 11.3, 29% below the WI average of 15.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
11.3%
↓ 29% · WI 15.9This facility: 11.3, 29% below the WI average of 15.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.6%
↑ 3% · WI 96.0This facility: 98.6, 3% above the WI average of 96.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.6%
↑ 3% · WI 96.0This facility: 98.6, 3% above the WI average of 96.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 5% · WI 95.6This facility: 100.0, 5% above the WI average of 95.6 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 5% · WI 95.6This facility: 100.0, 5% above the WI average of 95.6 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 3 measures
Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.3%
↑ 95% · WI 1.2This facility: 2.3, 95% above the WI average of 1.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.3%
↑ 95% · WI 1.2This facility: 2.3, 95% above the WI average of 1.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
83.5%
↓ 4% · WI 86.9This facility: 83.5, 4% below the WI average of 86.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
83.5%
↓ 4% · WI 86.9This facility: 83.5, 4% below the WI average of 86.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
79.2%
↓ 4% · WI 82.2This facility: 79.2, 4% below the WI average of 82.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
79.2%
↓ 4% · WI 82.2This facility: 79.2, 4% below the WI average of 82.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Amethyst Health of Brown Deer’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 164 Wisconsin nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Breaking even on care
2.9% operating margin
+16.1 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 3 of the last 8 reported years. Net income $0.3M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Payroll in line with Wisconsin homes
59.2% payroll share of revenue
WI average 58.7%Rank #61 / 164Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 61st out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Wisconsin average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.7M while revenue rose $1.8M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Wisconsin homes.
Revenue & profit
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2015 → 2024Trend | WI median | Compared with WI homesRank in WI | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $9.1M | +$1.8M | Trend 20152024 | WI median $8.3M | Rank in WI Rank #69 / 164Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 69th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Wisconsin average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 58% of homes | Above WI median Higher net patient revenue than 58% of WI homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $8.9M | +$0.6M | Trend 20152024 | WI median $8.4M | Rank in WI Rank #76 / 164Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 76th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Wisconsin homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 54% of homes | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $0.3M | +$1.2M | Trend 20152024 | WI median −$0.1M | Rank in WI Rank #55 / 164Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 55th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Wisconsin homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 67% of homes | Profit, growing Resident care made money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 2.9% | +16.1 pts | Trend 20152024 | WI median −1.0% | Rank in WI Rank #57 / 164Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 57th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Wisconsin homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 66% of homes | Thin margin A margin from 0% to 5% of revenue leaves little room for unexpected costs. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.0M | — | Trend — | WI median $0.1M | Rank in WI Rank #162 / 162Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 162nd out of 162 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Wisconsin homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 0% of homes | Adds to profit Income from outside resident care, on top of the profit from care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $0.3M | +$0.3M | Trend — | WI median $0.2M | Rank in WI Rank #77 / 164Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 77th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Wisconsin homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 53% of homes | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Staff spending in line with Wisconsin homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2015 → 2024Trend | WI median | Compared with WI homesRank in WI | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $5.4M | +$0.7M | Trend 20152024 | WI median $4.4M | Rank in WI Rank #57 / 164Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 57th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Wisconsin average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 66% of homes | Above WI median Higher payroll than 66% of WI homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 59.2% | −5.1 pts | Trend 20152024 | WI median 56.9% | Rank in WI Rank #61 / 164Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 61st out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Wisconsin average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 63% of homes | Near WI average The WI average is 58.7% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2015–2024 2 charts · WI benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income No report
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Wisconsin payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin WI payroll average No report
Year-by-year data, 2015–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2015 | 2016no report | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023no report | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $8.4M | $11.0M | $12.8M | $12.8M | $12.7M | $13.1M | $7.3M | $9.1M | ||
| Operating expenses | $15.3M | $12.5M | $14.4M | $12.6M | $14.4M | $12.7M | $8.3M | $8.9M | ||
| Net patient income | −$6.9M | −$1.5M | −$1.6M | $0.1M | −$1.7M | $0.4M | −$1.0M | $0.3M | ||
| Operating margin | −82.1% | −13.6% | −12.3% | 1.0% | −13.5% | 3.3% | −13.3% | 2.9% | ||
| Net income | −$2.8M | −$1.4M | −$1.5M | $0.2M | −$0.7M | $4.7M | −$0.1M | $0.3M | ||
| Payroll costs | $7.9M | $5.8M | $6.0M | $6.1M | $6.6M | $6.6M | $4.7M | $5.4M | ||
| Payroll share of revenue | 94.5% | 53.0% | 46.9% | 47.9% | 52.2% | 50.5% | 64.3% | 59.2% | ||
| Beds | 87 | 87 | 87 | 87 | 87 | 87 | 87 | 87 | ||
| Gross revenue | $12.4M | $16.3M | $18.8M | $18.7M | $18.8M | $20.2M | $11.3M | $9.3M | ||
| Salaries | $7.0M | $5.2M | $5.4M | $5.5M | $6.1M | $6.0M | $4.3M | $4.8M | ||
| Wage-related costs | $0.9M | $0.7M | $0.6M | $0.6M | $0.6M | $0.6M | $0.4M | $0.6M | ||
| Contract labor | — | — | — | — | — | — | $0.8M | $0.3M | ||
| Other operating costs | $7.4M | $6.7M | $8.4M | $6.5M | $7.8M | $6.1M | $3.6M | $3.5M | ||
| Net patient revenue per day | $300 | $386 | $437 | $432 | $469 | $468 | $385 | $449 | ||
| Cost per day | $546 | $439 | $490 | $428 | $533 | $453 | $436 | $436 | ||
| Average length of stay | 114.8 days | 79.3 days | 116.4 days | 97.7 days | 80.2 days | 91.5 days | 120.6 days | 215.8 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 7 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
100 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
51 · 51%
Medicaid
38 · 38%
Private pay & other
11 · 11%
Resident snapshot
63 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
13 · 21%
Medicaid
37 · 59%
Private pay & other
13 · 21%
Leaving
94 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
34 · 36%
Medicaid
53 · 56%
Private pay & other
7 · 7%
Mostly short-term rehab stays
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Places of interest near Amethyst Health of Brown Deer
9.4 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Milwaukee's city center to Amethyst Health of Brown Deer's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Amethyst Health of Brown Deer
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Milwaukee
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the WI Dept. of Health Services (DHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
Official facility name used in federal/state reporting (may differ slightly from the marketing name).
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
CCRC (Continuing Care Retirement Community):
A campus with multiple care levels so residents can age in place without moving.
|
City and state of the facility. Used for mapping and state-average comparisons.
|
Estimated monthly cost range for the facility.
|
Licensed bed capacity (maximum allowed). Not the same as how many beds are currently filled.
|
Better Business Bureau grade for the operating company. Reflects complaint handling and business practices, not clinical care quality.
|
Third-party neighborhood walkability score (0–100). Convenience/context metric, not a healthcare quality measure.
|
Housing or bed configuration options (e.g. studio, shared), often from facility-reported amenities and licensing details.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| St. Ann Health and Rehabilitation Center | NH HOS MC PC RC SNF | Milwaukee | - | 50
Facility
50
WI AVG
78
Rank
#114 / 197 | A- |
84
Facility
84
WI AVG
48
Rank
#16 / 191 | - |
| Eastcastle Place | NH AL CCRC IL MC SNF | Milwaukee (Murray Hill) | $5,134 - $7,789 | 18
Facility
18
WI AVG
78
Rank
#195 / 197 | - |
92
Facility
92
WI AVG
48
Rank
#3 / 191 | Studio / 1 Bed / 2 Bed |
| Milwaukee Catholic Home | NH AL CCRC IL MC SNF | Milwaukee (Northpoint) | $1,140 - $5,570 | 107
Facility
107
WI AVG
78
Rank
#43 / 197 | A+ |
83
Facility
83
WI AVG
48
Rank
#18 / 191 | 1 Bed / 2 Bed |
| Saint Johns on the Lake Central Tower | NH AL IL MC SNF | Milwaukee | - | 110
Facility
110
WI AVG
78
Rank
#35 / 197 | - |
87
Facility
87
WI AVG
48
Rank
#6 / 191 | - |
| Amethyst Health of Brown Deer | NH SNF | Milwaukee | - | 87
Facility
87
WI AVG
78
Rank
#76 / 197 | - |
28
Facility
28
WI AVG
48
Rank
#146 / 191 | - |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other WI nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Wisconsin
Amethyst Health of Brown Deer is located in MILWAUKEE, Wisconsin.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Wisconsin.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Amethyst Health of Brown Deer
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Who is the owner of Amethyst Health of Brown Deer?
Amethyst Health of Brown Deer is legally operated by Brown Deer Health Opco LLC, and administered by Jensen Patrick.
02 Is Amethyst Health of Brown Deer in a walkable area?
Amethyst Health of Brown Deer has a walk score of 28. Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
03 What is the occupancy rate at Amethyst Health of Brown Deer?
Amethyst Health of Brown Deer's occupancy is 65.3%.
04 Are pets allowed at Amethyst Health of Brown Deer?
No, Amethyst Health of Brown Deer has a no-pet policy.
05 What is the best email address for Amethyst Health of Brown Deer?
The team at Amethyst Health of Brown Deer can be reached at support@amethysthealthcenters.com.
06 Does Amethyst Health of Brown Deer operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Amethyst Health of Brown Deer is registered as a for-profit in WI.
07 Who is the administrator of Amethyst Health of Brown Deer?
Jensen Patrick is the administrator of Amethyst Health of Brown Deer.
Updated on
