Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
137
132 employees · 5 contractors · 46 on an average day Avamere Rehabilitation of King City
Nursing Home, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Tigard, OR
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Avamere Rehabilitation of King City
Nursing Home, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Tigard, OR
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Avamere Rehabilitation of King City accepts Medicaid, Medicare, and private pay.
Avamere Rehabilitation of King City operates a 148-bed facility in the Bull Mountain neighborhood of Tigard, Oregon, providing skilled nursing, nursing home services, and short-term respite care. Physical recovery programs take place in an on-site therapy gym, complemented by telemedicine access for remote clinical appointments.
Administrator Warren Taylor leads the facility alongside operator King City Rehab. Daily staffing records show an average of 5 hours and 5 minutes of direct nursing time per resident across the campus. Funding options cover Medicare, Medicaid, and direct private pay for eligible care stays.
Prospective individuals can reach out to Avamere Rehabilitation of King City to check current bed openings, review accepted payment plans, or arrange a facility walkthrough. Dedicated transit support is available for healthcare visits and routine daily outings.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 48th out of 77 nursing homes we track in Oregon for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 5m
This nursing home is ranked 48th out of 77 nursing homes we track in Oregon for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 5mStandout metric: Registered nurse (RN) is +35% above Oregon average
2 of 6 metrics below Oregon average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 10 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
10 staff · 7.6-hour shifts
56m
↑ 35% · OR 41mThis facility: 56m per resident per day, 35% above the Oregon average of 41m (among Oregon facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 10 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
10 staff · 7.6-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 10 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
10 staff · 8-hour shifts
30m
↓ 44% · OR 54mThis facility: 30m per resident per day, 44% below the Oregon average of 54m (among Oregon facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 10 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
10 staff · 8-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 54 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
54 staff · 7.5-hour shifts
3h 40m
↑ 9% · OR 3h 22mThis facility: 3h 40m per resident per day, 9% above the Oregon average of 3h 22m (among Oregon facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 54 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
54 staff · 7.5-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 20m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 20m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
2m
↓ 51% · OR 5mThis facility: 2m per resident per day, 51% below the Oregon average of 5m (among Oregon facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
4h 33m
↑ 4% · OR 4h 23mThis facility: 4h 33m per resident per day, 4% above the Oregon average of 4h 23m (among Oregon facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
29m
↑ 12% · OR 26mThis facility: 29m per resident per day, 12% above the Oregon average of 26m (among Oregon facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 28m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 28m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
137
132 employees · 5 contractors · 46 on an average day
137 total staff / 53 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
2.58 : 1
↑ 1% · OR 2.57This facility: 2.58 staff per resident, 1% above the Oregon average of 2.57 (among Oregon facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
137 staff ÷ 53 residents
See full Oregon ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.2 h
↓ 8% · OR 7.8 hThis facility: 7.2 h, 8% below the Oregon average of 7.8 h (among Oregon facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
30,057 staff hours this quarter
See full Oregon ranking →98.6% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Oregon average: 90.3% · Contractors this quarter: Feeding Assistant (2), Other Physician (1), Medical Director (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
148
Rank #4 / 91Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 4th out of 91 nursing homes we track in Oregon for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Oregon facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
148
Rank #4 / 91Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 4th out of 91 nursing homes we track in Oregon for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Oregon facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
Years of operating
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #26 / 81Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 26th out of 81 nursing homes we track in Oregon for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Oregon facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #26 / 81Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 26th out of 81 nursing homes we track in Oregon for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Oregon facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
25
years
Walk Score
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #77 / 95Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 77th out of 95 nursing homes we track in Oregon for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Oregon facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #77 / 95Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 77th out of 95 nursing homes we track in Oregon for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Oregon facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
35
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #68 / 70Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 68th out of 70 nursing homes we track in Oregon for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Oregon average, with its Statewide rank out of 70. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #68 / 70Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 68th out of 70 nursing homes we track in Oregon for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Oregon average, with its Statewide rank out of 70. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
40.9%
This home usually has availability
Based on 60.5 residents and 148 beds. Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Lower than the Oregon average: 72.7%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
125
days
BBB Rating
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
A+
Not Accredited
How BBB ratings workAbout This Community
Facility TypeNursing Facility
StatusActive
IssuanceDecember 1, 2000
CountyWashington
CMS Certification Number385132
Bronze Commitment to Quality Award from American Health Care Association
Avamere Rehabilitation of King City is administered by Tashina Goettel-Mcneley.
Owner NameKing City Rehab, LLC
Total
148 units
Total beds
148 units
Resident Council
Accept Medicare
Short-Term Rehab
Doctor on Staff
Respite CareRespite care provides families and unpaid caregivers with short-term relief from caregiving duties. Care can range from a few hours to a few weeks.
Transportation
Email
tgoettel@avamere.com
Fax(971) 223-0410
Pets not allowed
Smoking not allowed
Wellness Center
Emergency Call System
Two inspection records, one home. The state inspects it under state rules; CMS inspects its nursing-home beds under federal rules.
Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are the state record. CMS Health Inspection History, further down, is the federal record. Each counts its own visits and findings over its own dates, so the totals are not meant to match, and nothing is counted twice.
Inspection History
In Oregon, the Department of Human Services, Aging and People with Disabilities performs unannounced surveys and regular inspections to ensure resident safety in all care settings.
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Oregon state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Overall vs. OR average
2 Worse
Metrics worse than Oregon average:
• Total deficiencies (130% above)
• Deficiencies per inspection (32% above) 0 Better No metrics in this bucket.
• Total deficiencies (130% above)
• Deficiencies per inspection (32% above) 0 Better No metrics in this bucket.
Deficiencies
| This Facility | OR Average | vs. OR Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 76 | 33.0 | This facility has 130% more total deficiencies than a typical Oregon nursing home (76 vs. OR avg 33).↑ 130% worse |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
Average deficiencies per inspection.
| 5.8 | 4.4 | This facility has 32% more deficiencies per inspection than a typical Oregon nursing home (5.8 vs. OR avg 4.4).↑ 32% worse |
Inspections
| This Facility | OR Average | vs. OR Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 13 | 8.0 | This facility has had 63% more total inspections than the Oregon average (13 vs. OR avg 8). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 63% more |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Total health inspections
6
↑ 15% · OR 5.2This facility: 6, 15% above the OR average of 5.2 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
37
Rank #52 / 80Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 52nd out of 80 nursing homes we track in Oregon for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Oregon State average, with a ranking across all 80 OR facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 10% · OR 33.7This facility: 37, 10% above the OR average of 33.7 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
6.17
Rank #45 / 80Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 45th out of 80 nursing homes we track in Oregon for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Oregon mean across 80 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 5% · OR 6.49This facility: 6.17, 5% below the OR average of 6.49 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
37 of 37 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · OR 0.4This facility: 0, 100% below the OR average of 0.4 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · OR 1This facility: 0, 100% below the OR average of 1 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
37
↑ 15% · OR 32.1This facility: 37, 15% above the OR average of 32.1 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · OR 0.3This facility: 0, 100% below the OR average of 0.3 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Aug 13, 2026 · 4 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 11 of 37 citations · 7 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Aug 13, 2026
4 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Feb 20, 2026
2 citations
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Dec 05, 2025
8 citations
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 10, 2025
1 citation
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jul 19, 2024
12 citations
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 10, 2023
10 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 37 citations
Quality of Life & Care
11 deficiencies (30%)
Resident Rights
7 deficiencies (19%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
7 deficiencies (19%)
Nursing & Physician Services
4 deficiencies (11%)
Pharmacy Services
4 deficiencies (11%)
Nutrition & Dietary
3 deficiencies (8%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
1 deficiency (3%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
25 of 37 citations resulted from standard inspections; 8 of 37 resulted from complaint investigations; and 4 of 37 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Oct 2023.
Total fines
$0
OR avg $51KOregon average: $51,286. Average among the 64 Oregon facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
OR avg 1.53Oregon average: 1.53. Average among the 64 Oregon facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
OR avg 0.09Oregon average: 0.09. Average among the 64 Oregon facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Oregon average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 49% · OR 3.4This facility: 5.0, 49% above the OR average of 3.4 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
↑ 27% · OR 3.2This facility: 4.0, 27% above the OR average of 3.2 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
4.8
Score · lower is better
↓ 45% · OR 8.7This facility: 4.8, 45% below the OR average of 8.7 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
7.2
Score · lower is better
↓ 60% · OR 17.9This facility: 7.2, 60% below the OR average of 17.9 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 6 better, 4 worse, 1 near OR average
7 short-stay measures: 1 better, 2 worse, 2 near OR average, 2 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.8%
↓ 73% · OR 14.2This facility: 3.8, 73% below the OR average of 14.2 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.8%
↓ 73% · OR 14.2This facility: 3.8, 73% below the OR average of 14.2 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
7.6%
↓ 59% · OR 18.5This facility: 7.6, 59% below the OR average of 18.5 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
7.6%
↓ 59% · OR 18.5This facility: 7.6, 59% below the OR average of 18.5 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
10.2%
↓ 51% · OR 20.9This facility: 10.2, 51% below the OR average of 20.9 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
10.2%
↓ 51% · OR 20.9This facility: 10.2, 51% below the OR average of 20.9 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.0%
↑ 48% · OR 2.0This facility: 3.0, 48% above the OR average of 2.0 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.0%
↑ 48% · OR 2.0This facility: 3.0, 48% above the OR average of 2.0 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.5%
↑ 46% · OR 2.4This facility: 3.5, 46% above the OR average of 2.4 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.5%
↑ 46% · OR 2.4This facility: 3.5, 46% above the OR average of 2.4 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.1%
↓ 28% · OR 5.6This facility: 4.1, 28% below the OR average of 5.6 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.1%
↓ 28% · OR 5.6This facility: 4.1, 28% below the OR average of 5.6 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.0%
↑ 10% · OR 4.6This facility: 5.0, 10% above the OR average of 4.6 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.0%
↑ 10% · OR 4.6This facility: 5.0, 10% above the OR average of 4.6 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
10.4%
↑ 113% · OR 4.9This facility: 10.4, 113% above the OR average of 4.9 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
10.4%
↑ 113% · OR 4.9This facility: 10.4, 113% above the OR average of 4.9 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
7.7%
↓ 46% · OR 14.4This facility: 7.7, 46% below the OR average of 14.4 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
7.7%
↓ 46% · OR 14.4This facility: 7.7, 46% below the OR average of 14.4 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
97.5%
↑ 2% · OR 95.3This facility: 97.5, 2% above the OR average of 95.3 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
97.5%
↑ 2% · OR 95.3This facility: 97.5, 2% above the OR average of 95.3 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 6% · OR 94.0This facility: 100.0, 6% above the OR average of 94.0 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 6% · OR 94.0This facility: 100.0, 6% above the OR average of 94.0 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 7 measures
Daily care & independence
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
54.7%
↑ 8% · US 50.6This facility: 54.7, 8% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
54.7%
↑ 8% · US 50.6This facility: 54.7, 8% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.6%
↑ 87% · OR 1.4This facility: 2.6, 87% above the OR average of 1.4 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.6%
↑ 87% · OR 1.4This facility: 2.6, 87% above the OR average of 1.4 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
87.9%
↑ 3% · OR 85.7This facility: 87.9, 3% above the OR average of 85.7 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
87.9%
↑ 3% · OR 85.7This facility: 87.9, 3% above the OR average of 85.7 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
74.0%
↓ 9% · OR 80.9This facility: 74.0, 9% below the OR average of 80.9 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
74.0%
↓ 9% · OR 80.9This facility: 74.0, 9% below the OR average of 80.9 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
19.6%
↓ 9% · OR 21.6This facility: 19.6, 9% below the OR average of 21.6 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
19.6%
↓ 9% · OR 21.6This facility: 19.6, 9% below the OR average of 21.6 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
15.6%
↑ 3% · OR 15.1This facility: 15.6, 3% above the OR average of 15.1 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
15.6%
↑ 3% · OR 15.1This facility: 15.6, 3% above the OR average of 15.1 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Avamere Rehabilitation of King City’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 73 Oregon nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Breaking even on care
5.0% operating margin
+4.4 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 6 of the last 8 reported years. Net income $0.8M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Payroll in line with Oregon homes
53.4% payroll share of revenue
OR average 53.4%Rank #11 / 73Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 11th out of 73 nursing homes we track in Oregon for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Oregon average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $1.2M while revenue rose $1.0M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Oregon homes.
Revenue & profit
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | OR median | Compared with OR homesRank in OR | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $12.4M | +$1.0M | Trend 20172024 | OR median $11.9M | Rank in OR Rank #33 / 73Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 33rd out of 73 nursing homes we track in Oregon for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Oregon average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 56% of homes | Above OR median Higher net patient revenue than 56% of OR homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $11.8M | +$0.5M | Trend 20172024 | OR median $11.9M | Rank in OR Rank #38 / 73Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 38th out of 73 nursing homes we track in Oregon for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Oregon homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 49% of homes | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $0.6M | +$0.6M | Trend 20172024 | OR median $0.7M | Rank in OR Rank #39 / 73Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 39th out of 73 nursing homes we track in Oregon for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Oregon homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 47% of homes | Profit, growing Resident care made money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 5.0% | +4.4 pts | Trend 20172024 | OR median 7.0% | Rank in OR Rank #43 / 73Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 43rd out of 73 nursing homes we track in Oregon for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Oregon homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 42% of homes | Thin margin A margin from 0% to 5% of revenue leaves little room for unexpected costs. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.2M | — | Trend — | OR median $0.1M | Rank in OR Rank #24 / 56Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 24th out of 56 nursing homes we track in Oregon for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Oregon homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 58% of homes | Adds to profit Income from outside resident care, on top of the profit from care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $0.8M | +$0.7M | Trend — | OR median $1.0M | Rank in OR Rank #40 / 73Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 40th out of 73 nursing homes we track in Oregon for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Oregon homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 46% of homes | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Staff spending in line with Oregon homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | OR median | Compared with OR homesRank in OR | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $6.6M | +$1.2M | Trend 20172024 | OR median $6.2M | Rank in OR Rank #31 / 73Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 31st out of 73 nursing homes we track in Oregon for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Oregon average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 58% of homes | Above OR median Higher payroll than 58% of OR homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 53.4% | +5.6 pts | Trend 20172024 | OR median 49.1% | Rank in OR Rank #11 / 73Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 11th out of 73 nursing homes we track in Oregon for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Oregon average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 86% of homes | Near OR average The OR average is 53.4% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · OR benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Oregon payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin OR payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $9.1M | $9.1M | $9.6M | $10.1M | $10.1M | $10.2M | $11.4M | $12.4M |
| Operating expenses | $8.7M | $8.8M | $9.2M | $9.7M | $10.2M | $10.4M | $11.4M | $11.8M |
| Net patient income | $0.4M | $0.3M | $0.4M | $0.4M | −$0.0M | −$0.2M | $0.1M | $0.6M |
| Operating margin | 4.0% | 3.4% | 4.5% | 3.5% | −0.3% | −1.9% | 0.6% | 5.0% |
| Net income | $0.4M | $0.4M | $0.5M | $0.7M | $0.4M | −$0.0M | $0.1M | $0.8M |
| Payroll costs | $4.1M | $4.1M | $4.2M | $4.8M | $4.6M | $4.6M | $5.5M | $6.6M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 45.2% | 44.7% | 43.6% | 47.2% | 45.2% | 45.6% | 47.8% | 53.4% |
| Beds | 148 | 148 | 148 | 148 | 148 | 148 | 148 | 148 |
| Gross revenue | $11.1M | $11.1M | $11.9M | $11.0M | $10.5M | $9.5M | $12.1M | $13.1M |
| Salaries | $3.3M | $3.3M | $3.5M | $4.0M | $3.8M | $3.8M | $4.4M | $5.3M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.8M | $0.8M | $0.7M | $0.8M | $0.8M | $0.8M | $1.0M | $1.3M |
| Contract labor | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other operating costs | $4.6M | $4.7M | $5.0M | $5.0M | $5.6M | $5.7M | $5.9M | $5.2M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $371 | $391 | $296 | $409 | $449 | $503 | $534 | $568 |
| Cost per day | $357 | $378 | $282 | $395 | $450 | $513 | $531 | $540 |
| Average length of stay | 77.9 days | 61.7 days | 73.8 days | 92.7 days | 86.5 days | 79.8 days | 95.5 days | 125.1 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
180 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
28 · 16%
Medicaid
43 · 24%
Private pay & other
109 · 61%
Resident snapshot
53 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
11 · 21%
Medicaid
42 · 79%
Private pay & other
0 · 0%
Leaving
175 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
25 · 14%
Medicaid
53 · 30%
Private pay & other
97 · 55%
Primarily long-term care, limited rehab
Most residents stay long-term, while a smaller portion are admitted for short-term rehab.
Places of interest near Avamere Rehabilitation of King City
1.8 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Tigard's city center to Avamere Rehabilitation of King City's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Avamere Rehabilitation of King City
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around the area
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the OR Dept. of Human Services (ODHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Oregon average is: 53.4% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avamere Rehabilitation of Beaverton | NH AL IL MC SNF | Beaverton (Vose) | 104
Facility
104
OR AVG
80
Rank
#19 / 91 |
69.5%
Facility
69.5%
OR AVG
72.7%
Rank
#43 / 70 | -4% | 5.37
Facility
5.37
OR AVG
5.48
Rank
#29 / 77 | +29% | -2% | $0
Facility
$0
OR AVG
$52.9k
Rank
#1 / 80 | 20
Facility
20
OR AVG
33.7
Rank
#24 / 80 | 4.0
Facility
4.0
OR AVG
6.5
Rank
#18 / 80 | - | 72 | - |
68
Facility
68
OR AVG
61
Rank
#46 / 95 | Beaverton Rehab And Specialty Care, LLC | $16.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$16.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
OR AVG
$12.5M
Rank
#10 / 73 | $8.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
OR AVG
$6.3M
Rank
#13 / 73 | 50.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
50.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
OR AVG
53.4%
Rank
#26 / 73 | 385195 | ||||
| Regency Gresham | NH RC SNF | Gresham (Powell Valley) | 128
Facility
128
OR AVG
80
Rank
#6 / 91 |
68.7%
Facility
68.7%
OR AVG
72.7%
Rank
#44 / 70 | -5% | 5.48
Facility
5.48
OR AVG
5.48
Rank
#25 / 77 | +45% | 0% | $0
Facility
$0
OR AVG
$52.9k
Rank
#1 / 80 | 21
Facility
21
OR AVG
33.7
Rank
#27 / 80 | 7.0
Facility
7.0
OR AVG
6.5
Rank
#51 / 80 | - | 88 | A+ |
21
Facility
21
OR AVG
61
Rank
#86 / 95 | David Stroud | $19.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$19.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
OR AVG
$12.5M
Rank
#6 / 73 | $10.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$10.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
OR AVG
$6.3M
Rank
#5 / 73 | 52.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
52.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
OR AVG
53.4%
Rank
#14 / 73 | 385015 | ||||
| Bend Transitional Care | NH AL IL MC RC SNF | Bend (Mountain View) | 60
Facility
60
OR AVG
80
Rank
#63 / 91 |
97.2%
Facility
97.2%
OR AVG
72.7%
Rank
#1 / 70 | +34% | 4.19
Facility
4.19
OR AVG
5.48
Rank
#77 / 77 | +114% | -24% | $0
Facility
$0
OR AVG
$52.9k
Rank
#1 / 80 | 11
Facility
11
OR AVG
33.7
Rank
#7 / 80 | 3.7
Facility
3.7
OR AVG
6.5
Rank
#13 / 80 | - | 58 | - |
70
Facility
70
OR AVG
61
Rank
#44 / 95 | Ohana Harmony House, LLC | $14.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$14.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
OR AVG
$12.5M
Rank
#27 / 73 | $7.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
OR AVG
$6.3M
Rank
#22 / 73 | 53.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
53.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
OR AVG
53.4%
Rank
#12 / 73 | 385253 | ||||
| Avamere at Three Fountains | NH SNF | Medford | 117
Facility
117
OR AVG
80
Rank
#11 / 91 |
64.6%
Facility
64.6%
OR AVG
72.7%
Rank
#51 / 70 | -11% | 5.49
Facility
5.49
OR AVG
5.48
Rank
#25 / 77 | -36% | 0% | $0
Facility
$0
OR AVG
$52.9k
Rank
#1 / 80 | 24
Facility
24
OR AVG
33.7
Rank
#32 / 80 | 6.0
Facility
6.0
OR AVG
6.5
Rank
#41 / 80 | 2 | 76 | A+ | - | Waterford Operations, LLC | $18.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$18.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
OR AVG
$12.5M
Rank
#8 / 73 | $9.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$9.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
OR AVG
$6.3M
Rank
#8 / 73 | 50.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
50.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
OR AVG
53.4%
Rank
#24 / 73 | 385126 | ||||
| Avamere Rehabilitation of King City | NH RC SNF | Tigard (Bull Mountain) | 148
Facility
148
OR AVG
80
Rank
#4 / 91 |
40.9%
Facility
40.9%
OR AVG
72.7%
Rank
#68 / 70 | -44% | 5.09
Facility
5.09
OR AVG
5.48
Rank
#48 / 77 | -24% | -7% | $0
Facility
$0
OR AVG
$52.9k
Rank
#1 / 80 | 37
Facility
37
OR AVG
33.7
Rank
#52 / 80 | 6.2
Facility
6.2
OR AVG
6.5
Rank
#45 / 80 | - | 61 | A+ |
35
Facility
35
OR AVG
61
Rank
#77 / 95 | King City Rehab, LLC | $12.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$12.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
OR AVG
$12.5M
Rank
#33 / 73 | $6.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$6.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
OR AVG
$6.3M
Rank
#31 / 73 | 53.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
53.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
OR AVG
53.4%
Rank
#11 / 73 | 385132 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other OR nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Avamere Rehabilitation of King City
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 What neighborhood is Avamere Rehabilitation of King City in?
Avamere Rehabilitation of King City is in the Bull Mountain neighborhood of Tigard.
02 Who is the owner of Avamere Rehabilitation of King City?
Avamere Rehabilitation of King City is legally operated by King City Rehab, LLC, and administered by Tashina Goettel-Mcneley.
03 Is Avamere Rehabilitation of King City in a walkable area?
Avamere Rehabilitation of King City has a walk score of 35. Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
04 What is the occupancy rate at Avamere Rehabilitation of King City?
Avamere Rehabilitation of King City's occupancy is 40.9%.
05 How long has Avamere Rehabilitation of King City been in business?
Avamere Rehabilitation of King City has been operating for approximately 25 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
06 Are pets allowed at Avamere Rehabilitation of King City?
No, Avamere Rehabilitation of King City has a no-pet policy.
07 What is the best email address for Avamere Rehabilitation of King City?
The team at Avamere Rehabilitation of King City can be reached at tgoettel@avamere.com.
Updated on
