Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
150
74 employees · 76 contractors · 36 on an average day Bedford Care Center of Petal
Nursing Home, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Petal, MS
ALM Inspection Grade
B+
ALM's inspection grade is 88 / 100, a B+ — 5 points above the Mississippi average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 88 / 100, a B+ — 5 points above the Mississippi average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Bedford Care Center of Petal
Nursing Home, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Petal, MS
ALM Inspection Grade
B+
ALM's inspection grade is 88 / 100, a B+ — 5 points above the Mississippi average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 88 / 100, a B+ — 5 points above the Mississippi average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Bedford Care Center of Petal accepts Medicaid, Medicare, and private pay.
In Petal, MS, Bedford Care Center of Petal is a nursing home with skilled nursing and memory care. Skilled nursing puts licensed nursing care on the premises. Memory care brings supervision for a resident living with dementia. The combination benefits an individual who requires both cognitive assistance and continuous nursing care.
The home has 60 beds, divided into individual rooms and spaces for two residents to share. Every resident gets an average of 3 hours and 56 minutes of nursing care daily.
The charge may be billed to Medicaid, Medicare, or private pay. Medicaid is the option when a family’s funds might deplete during an extended stay, while Medicare covers short-term skilled care following a hospital discharge, not for long-term living. Private pay refers to individual finances.
Residents have the option to relax in the courtyard or on the porch, and the bistro or café available on-site is one more place to eat. The list of activities includes exercise sessions, range-of-motion exercises, gardening, arts and crafts, musical programs, and community gatherings. Charlotte Donald manages the home for Bedford Care Center-Petal LLC, its operator.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 24th out of 113 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 56m
This nursing home is ranked 24th out of 113 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 56mStandout metric: Physical therapist is +135% above Mississippi average
5 of 6 metrics below Mississippi average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 13 total: 8 of the facility's own employees and 5 agency contractors.
13 staff · 9.8-hour shifts
36m
↓ 5% · MS 38mThis facility: 36m per resident per day, 5% below the Mississippi average of 38m (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 13 total: 8 of the facility's own employees and 5 agency contractors.
13 staff · 9.8-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 27 total: 18 of the facility's own employees and 9 agency contractors.
27 staff · 9.9-hour shifts
1h 2m
↓ 4% · MS 1h 5mThis facility: 1h 2m per resident per day, 4% below the Mississippi average of 1h 5m (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 27 total: 18 of the facility's own employees and 9 agency contractors.
27 staff · 9.9-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 91 total: 45 of the facility's own employees and 46 agency contractors.
91 staff · 7.6-hour shifts
2h 18m
↓ 7% · MS 2h 29mThis facility: 2h 18m per resident per day, 7% below the Mississippi average of 2h 29m (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 91 total: 45 of the facility's own employees and 46 agency contractors.
91 staff · 7.6-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 21m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
5m
↑ 135% · MS 2mThis facility: 5m per resident per day, 135% above the Mississippi average of 2m (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
3h 12m
↓ 9% · MS 3h 31mThis facility: 3h 12m per resident per day, 9% below the Mississippi average of 3h 31m (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
10m
↓ 52% · MS 22mThis facility: 10m per resident per day, 52% below the Mississippi average of 22m (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
150
74 employees · 76 contractors · 36 on an average day
150 total staff / 51 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
2.94 : 1
↑ 84% · MS 1.60This facility: 2.94 staff per resident, 84% above the Mississippi average of 1.60 (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
150 staff ÷ 51 residents
See full Mississippi ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8.1 h
↑ 1% · MS 8 hThis facility: 8.1 h, 1% above the Mississippi average of 8 h (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
26,869 staff hours this quarter
See full Mississippi ranking →74.7% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Mississippi average: 89.5% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (46), Licensed Practical Nurse (9), Registered Nurse (5), Qualified Social Worker (5), Respiratory Therapy Technician (2), Physical Therapy Assistant (2), Medical Director (2), Speech Language Pathologist (1), Physical Therapy Aide (1), Feeding Assistant (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1), Occupational Therapy Aide (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
60
Rank #67 / 124Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 67th out of 124 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Mississippi facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
60
Rank #67 / 124Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 67th out of 124 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Mississippi facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Walk Score
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #86 / 122Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 86th out of 122 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Mississippi facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #86 / 122Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 86th out of 122 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Mississippi facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
27
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #33 / 116Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 33rd out of 116 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Mississippi average, with its Statewide rank out of 116. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #33 / 116Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 33rd out of 116 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Mississippi average, with its Statewide rank out of 116. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
91.7%
This home usually has limited availability
Based on 55 residents and 60 beds. Source: state inspection report (Jul 2026)
Higher than the Mississippi average: 86.7%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
189
days
About This Community
Facility TypeNursing Home
CountyForrest
Bedford Care Center of Petal is legally operated by Bedford Care Center-Petal LLC, and administered by Charlotte Donald.
Ownership TypeProprietary
Resident Council
Family Council
Range of Motion Exercises
Physical Therapy
Speech Therapy
Occupational Therapy
Physician Services
Nutritional Services with Certified Dietary Managers
Laundry & Linen
Courtyard
Porch
Flexible Visiting Hours
Spacious Dining and Day Rooms
Emergency Call System
Beauty Salon
Activities
Exercise Classes
Arts and Crafts
Community Events Participation
Gardening
Games
Music Programs
Dining & Nutrition
Sourced directly from the team at Bedford Care Center of Petal.
Dining & Nutrition
Sourced directly from the team at Bedford Care Center of Petal.- Bistro / café on site.
Room Types
Private Room
Semi-Private / Shared Room
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
88 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
5 points above the Mississippi average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Strong
13 severity-weighted points (6 deficiencies) · 4× lower than the typical CMS-certified MS facility (median: 50)
Enforcement
Typical
$22,198 in fines · 2 enforcement actions
Persistence
Concern
39 days to fix issues · slower than the typical CMS-certified MS facility (median: 33)
Total health inspections
4
↓ 15% · MS 4.7This facility: 4, 15% below the Mississippi average of 4.7 (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
6
Rank #7 / 114Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 7th out of 114 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Mississippi State average, with a ranking across all 114 MS facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 67% · MS 18.1This facility: 6, 67% below the Mississippi average of 18.1 (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
1.5
Rank #4 / 114Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 4th out of 114 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Mississippi mean across 114 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 61% · MS 3.83This facility: 1.5, 61% below the Mississippi average of 3.83 (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
83% corrected
5 of 6 citations corrected · 1 still open
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · MS 0.9This facility: 0, 100% below the Mississippi average of 0.9 (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · MS 1.2This facility: 0, 100% below the Mississippi average of 1.2 (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
6
↓ 62% · MS 15.7This facility: 6, 62% below the Mississippi average of 15.7 (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
83% corrected · 1 open
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · MS 0.3This facility: 0, 100% below the Mississippi average of 0.3 (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Nov 25, 2025 · 1 citation (Resident Rights, moderate), not yet corrected
Most cited category: Infection Control, 2 of 6 citations · 5 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Nov 25, 2025
1 citation
Resident Rights moderate citation
Mar 20, 2025
1 citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Oct 05, 2023
3 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Feb 04, 2021
1 citation
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 6 citations
Infection Control
2 deficiencies (33%)
Resident Rights
1 deficiency (17%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
1 deficiency (17%)
Quality of Life & Care
1 deficiency (17%)
Nutrition & Dietary
1 deficiency (17%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
5 of 6 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 1 of 6 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
2 penalties in the past 3 years
Latest: Dec 8, 2023 · $22,198 civil money penalty
Dec 8, 2023 · $22,198 civil money penalty
Dec 8, 2023 · 13-day payment denial
Total fines
$22,198
↓ 34% · MS $34KThis facility: $22,198, 34% below the Mississippi average of $33,848. Average among the 110 Mississippi facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #90 / 115Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 90th out of 115 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Mississippi average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 115 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
1
↓ 51% · MS 2.05This facility: 1, 51% below the Mississippi average of 2.05. Average among the 110 Mississippi facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
1
13 days
↑ 400% · MS 0.2This facility: 1, 400% above the Mississippi average of 0.2. Average among the 110 Mississippi facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Dec 8, 2023
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$22,198
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$22,198
Dec 8, 2023
Payment denial
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
New admissions not paid
13 days
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
New admissions not paid
13 daysFine amount comparison
This facility
$22,198
Mississippi average
$33,848
US average
$67,417
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Mississippi and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Mississippi average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
1
/ 5
Significantly below average
↓ 50% · MS 2.0This facility: 1.0, 50% below the MS average of 2.0 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
↑ 107% · MS 1.9This facility: 4.0, 107% above the MS average of 1.9 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
15.0
Score · lower is better
↑ 36% · MS 11.1This facility: 15.0, 36% above the MS average of 11.1 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
28.8
Score · lower is better
↑ 42% · MS 20.2This facility: 28.8, 42% above the MS average of 20.2 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 3 better, 7 worse, 2 near MS average, 1 without a benchmark
8 short-stay measures: 4 better, 1 worse, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
20.8%
↑ 1% · MS 20.5This facility: 20.8, 1% above the MS average of 20.5 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
20.8%
↑ 1% · MS 20.5This facility: 20.8, 1% above the MS average of 20.5 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
32.4%
↑ 65% · MS 19.6This facility: 32.4, 65% above the MS average of 19.6 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
32.4%
↑ 65% · MS 19.6This facility: 32.4, 65% above the MS average of 19.6 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
33.1%
↑ 60% · MS 20.7This facility: 33.1, 60% above the MS average of 20.7 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
33.1%
↑ 60% · MS 20.7This facility: 33.1, 60% above the MS average of 20.7 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
↓ 100% · MS 2.5This facility: 0.0, 100% below the MS average of 2.5 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
↓ 100% · MS 2.5This facility: 0.0, 100% below the MS average of 2.5 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.9%
↑ 121% · MS 3.1This facility: 6.9, 121% above the MS average of 3.1 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.9%
↑ 121% · MS 3.1This facility: 6.9, 121% above the MS average of 3.1 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.6%
↓ 43% · MS 6.3This facility: 3.6, 43% below the MS average of 6.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.6%
↓ 43% · MS 6.3This facility: 3.6, 43% below the MS average of 6.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11.5%
↑ 85% · MS 6.2This facility: 11.5, 85% above the MS average of 6.2 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11.5%
↑ 85% · MS 6.2This facility: 11.5, 85% above the MS average of 6.2 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
16.5%
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
16.5%
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
30.5%
↑ 41% · MS 21.7This facility: 30.5, 41% above the MS average of 21.7 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
30.5%
↑ 41% · MS 21.7This facility: 30.5, 41% above the MS average of 21.7 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 5% · MS 95.4This facility: 100.0, 5% above the MS average of 95.4 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 5% · MS 95.4This facility: 100.0, 5% above the MS average of 95.4 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 3% · MS 97.0This facility: 100.0, 3% above the MS average of 97.0 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 3% · MS 97.0This facility: 100.0, 3% above the MS average of 97.0 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
4.69
↑ 92% · MS 2.44This facility: 4.69, 92% above the MS average of 2.44 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
4.69
↑ 92% · MS 2.44This facility: 4.69, 92% above the MS average of 2.44 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
4.36
↑ 51% · MS 2.88This facility: 4.36, 51% above the MS average of 2.88 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
4.36
↑ 51% · MS 2.88This facility: 4.36, 51% above the MS average of 2.88 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
68.6%
↑ 28% · US 53.7This facility: 68.6, 28% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
68.6%
↑ 28% · US 53.7This facility: 68.6, 28% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
55.8%
↑ 10% · US 50.6This facility: 55.8, 10% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
55.8%
↑ 10% · US 50.6This facility: 55.8, 10% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · MS 2.5This facility: 0.0, 100% below the MS average of 2.5 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · MS 2.5This facility: 0.0, 100% below the MS average of 2.5 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
97.2%
↑ 10% · MS 88.5This facility: 97.2, 10% above the MS average of 88.5 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
97.2%
↑ 10% · MS 88.5This facility: 97.2, 10% above the MS average of 88.5 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 18% · MS 84.6This facility: 100.0, 18% above the MS average of 84.6 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 18% · MS 84.6This facility: 100.0, 18% above the MS average of 84.6 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
41.3%
↑ 48% · MS 27.9This facility: 41.3, 48% above the MS average of 27.9 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
41.3%
↑ 48% · MS 27.9This facility: 41.3, 48% above the MS average of 27.9 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
13.3%
↓ 13% · MS 15.3This facility: 13.3, 13% below the MS average of 15.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
13.3%
↓ 13% · MS 15.3This facility: 13.3, 13% below the MS average of 15.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Bedford Care Center of Petal’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 108 Mississippi nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, and more than last year
−3.4% operating margin
−3.1 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 5 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($0.0M) trims the net loss to −$0.2M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Payroll in line with Mississippi homes
48.6% payroll share of revenue
MS average 49.5%Rank #43 / 108Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 43rd out of 108 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Mississippi average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.1M while revenue fell $0.0M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Mississippi homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | MS median | Compared with MS homesRank in MS | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $6.5M | −$0.0M | Trend 20172024 | MS median $8.2M | Rank in MS Rank #84 / 108Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 84th out of 108 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Mississippi average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 22% of homes | Below MS median Higher net patient revenue than 22% of MS homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $6.8M | +$0.2M | Trend 20172024 | MS median — | Rank in MS Not ranked | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$0.2M | −$0.2M | Trend 20172024 | MS median — | Rank in MS Not ranked | Loss, widening Resident care lost money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −3.4% | −3.1 pts | Trend 20172024 | MS median — | Rank in MS Not ranked | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.0M | — | Trend — | MS median — | Rank in MS Not ranked | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$0.2M | −$0.2M | Trend — | MS median — | Rank in MS Not ranked | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Staff spending in line with Mississippi homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | MS median | Compared with MS homesRank in MS | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $3.2M | +$0.1M | Trend 20172024 | MS median $4.1M | Rank in MS Rank #83 / 108Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 83rd out of 108 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Mississippi average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 23% of homes | Below MS median Higher payroll than 23% of MS homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 48.6% | +1.2 pts | Trend 20172024 | MS median 47.0% | Rank in MS Rank #43 / 108Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 43rd out of 108 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Mississippi average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 61% of homes | Near MS average The MS average is 49.5% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · MS benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Mississippi payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin MS payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $5.8M | $6.5M | $5.7M | $5.5M | $5.8M | $6.5M | $6.6M | $6.5M |
| Operating expenses | $5.5M | $6.6M | $6.0M | $5.9M | $5.8M | $6.1M | $6.6M | $6.8M |
| Net patient income | $0.3M | −$0.2M | −$0.3M | −$0.4M | $0.0M | $0.4M | −$0.0M | −$0.2M |
| Operating margin | 5.3% | −2.4% | −5.4% | −7.2% | 0.5% | 6.0% | −0.4% | −3.4% |
| Net income | $0.4M | −$0.1M | −$0.3M | −$0.2M | $0.7M | $0.5M | $0.0M | −$0.2M |
| Payroll costs | $2.5M | $2.7M | $2.8M | $2.8M | $2.8M | $2.9M | $3.1M | $3.2M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 42.8% | 41.1% | 49.2% | 51.5% | 48.1% | 44.0% | 47.4% | 48.6% |
| Beds | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 |
| Gross revenue | $6.4M | $6.5M | $6.7M | $6.6M | $6.7M | $7.4M | $8.7M | $8.0M |
| Salaries | $2.0M | $2.1M | $2.2M | $2.3M | $2.2M | $2.3M | $2.5M | $2.6M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.5M | $0.5M | $0.6M | $0.5M | $0.5M | $0.5M | $0.6M | $0.6M |
| Contract labor | $0.6M | $0.7M | $0.8M | $0.6M | $0.8M | $0.7M | $0.7M | $0.8M |
| Other operating costs | $3.0M | $4.0M | $3.2M | $3.0M | $3.0M | $3.3M | $3.5M | $3.6M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $276 | $308 | $271 | $273 | $307 | $324 | $319 | $335 |
| Cost per day | $261 | $316 | $286 | $293 | $305 | $304 | $320 | $347 |
| Average length of stay | 166.4 days | 111.7 days | 149.8 days | 250.7 days | 146.6 days | 122.8 days | 146.0 days | 189.4 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Jun 2026
Arriving
78 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
37 · 47%
Medicaid
4 · 5%
Private pay & other
37 · 47%
Resident snapshot
51 residents · Jun 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
8 · 16%
Medicaid
32 · 63%
Private pay & other
11 · 22%
Leaving
103 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
45 · 44%
Medicaid
25 · 24%
Private pay & other
33 · 32%
Mix of rehab and long-term care
This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.
Places of interest near Bedford Care Center of Petal
1.1 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Petal's city center to Bedford Care Center of Petal's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Bedford Care Center of Petal
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Hattiesburg
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the MS State Dept. of Health (MSDH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Mississippi average is: 49.5% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bedford Care Center of Petal | NH MC SNF | Petal | 60
Facility
60
MS AVG
88
Rank
#67 / 124 | B+ |
91.7%
Facility
91.7%
MS AVG
86.7%
Rank
#33 / 116 | +6% | 3.94
Facility
3.94
MS AVG
4.85
Rank
#24 / 113 | -7% | -19% | $22.2k
Facility
$22.2k
MS AVG
$32.8k
Rank
#90 / 115 | 6
Facility
6
MS AVG
18.1
Rank
#7 / 114 | 1.5
Facility
1.5
MS AVG
3.8
Rank
#4 / 114 | - | 55 | - |
27
Facility
27
MS AVG
39
Rank
#86 / 122 | Bedford Care Center-Petal LLC | $6.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$6.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
$9.0M
Rank
#84 / 108 | $3.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$3.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
$4.3M
Rank
#83 / 108 | 48.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
48.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
49.5%
Rank
#43 / 108 | 255149 | ||||
| Forrest General Hospital Skilled Nursing Unit | NH SNF | Hattiesburg (Parkhaven) | 30
Facility
30
MS AVG
88
Rank
#123 / 124 | A |
96.7%
Facility
96.7%
MS AVG
86.7%
Rank
#13 / 116 | +12% | 8.91
Facility
8.91
MS AVG
4.85
Rank
#2 / 113 | +89% | +84% | $0
Facility
$0
MS AVG
$32.8k
Rank
#1 / 115 | 2
Facility
2
MS AVG
18.1
Rank
#2 / 114 | 1.0
Facility
1.0
MS AVG
3.8
Rank
#1 / 114 | - | 29 | - |
67
Facility
67
MS AVG
39
Rank
#8 / 122 | - | - | - | - | 255335 | ||||
| Bedford Alzheimer’s Care Center | NH MC SNF | Hattiesburg | 60
Facility
60
MS AVG
88
Rank
#67 / 124 | A- |
97.0%
Facility
97.0%
MS AVG
86.7%
Rank
#10 / 116 | +12% | 6.62
Facility
6.62
MS AVG
4.85
Rank
#7 / 113 | - | +37% | $66.7k
Facility
$66.7k
MS AVG
$32.8k
Rank
#104 / 115 | 3
Facility
3
MS AVG
18.1
Rank
#4 / 114 | 1.5
Facility
1.5
MS AVG
3.8
Rank
#4 / 114 | 2 | 58 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 25A416 | ||||
| Hattiesburg Health & Rehab | NH MC SNF | Hattiesburg | 184
Facility
184
MS AVG
88
Rank
#2 / 124 | B+ |
79.3%
Facility
79.3%
MS AVG
86.7%
Rank
#98 / 116 | -9% | 4.84
Facility
4.84
MS AVG
4.85
Rank
#35 / 113 | -19% | 0% | $8.0k
Facility
$8.0k
MS AVG
$32.8k
Rank
#56 / 115 | 9
Facility
9
MS AVG
18.1
Rank
#12 / 114 | 2.3
Facility
2.3
MS AVG
3.8
Rank
#12 / 114 | 1 | 146 | - |
57
Facility
57
MS AVG
39
Rank
#20 / 122 | Tyson | $16.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$16.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
$9.0M
Rank
#4 / 108 | $9.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$9.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
$4.3M
Rank
#2 / 108 | 55.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
55.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
49.5%
Rank
#21 / 108 | 255321 | ||||
| Bedford Care Center of Hattiesburg | NH MC SNF | Hattiesburg | 100
Facility
100
MS AVG
88
Rank
#43 / 124 | A |
88.0%
Facility
88.0%
MS AVG
86.7%
Rank
#57 / 116 | +1% | 3.52
Facility
3.52
MS AVG
4.85
Rank
#91 / 113 | -23% | -27% | $0
Facility
$0
MS AVG
$32.8k
Rank
#1 / 115 | 12
Facility
12
MS AVG
18.1
Rank
#32 / 114 | 4.0
Facility
4.0
MS AVG
3.8
Rank
#70 / 114 | - | 88 | - |
54
Facility
54
MS AVG
39
Rank
#29 / 122 | Lisa Fairchild | $11.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$11.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
$9.0M
Rank
#27 / 108 | $4.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$4.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
$4.3M
Rank
#33 / 108 | 44%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
44%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
49.5%
Rank
#73 / 108 | 255158 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other MS nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Mississippi
Bedford Care Center of Petal is located in Petal, Mississippi.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Mississippi.
Frequently Asked Questions about Bedford Care Center of Petal
Who is the owner of Bedford Care Center of Petal?
Bedford Care Center of Petal is legally operated by Bedford Care Center-Petal LLC, and administered by Charlotte Donald.
Is Bedford Care Center of Petal in a walkable area?
Bedford Care Center of Petal has a walk score of 27. Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
What is the occupancy rate at Bedford Care Center of Petal?
Bedford Care Center of Petal's occupancy is 91.7%.
Are pets allowed at Bedford Care Center of Petal?
No, Bedford Care Center of Petal has a no-pet policy.
Does Bedford Care Center of Petal operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Bedford Care Center of Petal is registered as a for-profit in MS.
Who is the administrator of Bedford Care Center of Petal?
Charlotte Donald is the administrator of Bedford Care Center of Petal.
What is the overall rating for Bedford Care Center of Petal?
Bedford Care Center of Petal received a 4-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Updated on
