We arrange tours, appointments, and even moving support so you don’t have to
The Overall CMS Rating is scored from 1 to 5 stars and combines results from health inspections, staffing levels, and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
The Overall CMS Rating is scored from 1 to 5 stars and combines results from health inspections, staffing levels, and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Canterbury Woods operates a 50-bed skilled nursing facility at 725 Renaissance Drive in Williamsville, Erie County, New York, as part of the Episcopal Church Home and Affiliates Life Care Community network.
Founded in 1999 and structured as a continuing care retirement community, the facility accepts private-pay residents and Medicare-eligible short-term rehabilitation patients but does not accept Medicaid. The nonprofit model supports mission-driven operations under operator Shaida Behnam’s administration.
The CMS overall rating is 3 stars; health inspection rating is 4 stars; quality measures rating is 4 stars.
Current occupancy of 82% (41 of 50 beds) tracks below the New York average of 88.3%.
Staffing depth distinguishes this facility: combined nursing hours total 5 hours 6 minutes per resident per day, a 46-percent surplus over the New York state average of 3 hours 29 minutes. Registered nurse presence stands at 1 hour 7 minutes daily (72% above state average), with weekend RN coverage at 55 minutes (83% above state average). Licensed practical nurses and certified nursing aides contribute 1 hour 30 minutes and 3 hours 23 minutes per day respectively, both above state benchmarks. This staffing profile positions Canterbury Woods in the top 18 facilities statewide for adjusted nursing hours per resident per day.
Between 2021 and 2025, the facility received 8 inspections, identifying 21 total deficiencies; significantly more per inspection (2.6 vs. state average 1.4) and more per year (4.2 vs. state average 2.6).
The most recent inspection in January 2025 documented 9 health and life safety deficiencies including infection control, abuse and neglect policies, pressure ulcer management, and fire safety code compliance, all corrected by February. Over the same period, the facility received 38 complaints, 52% fewer than state average per year, with all complaint investigations finding unsubstantiated claims.
The facility reports zero federal enforcement actions and zero civil money penalties.
The walk score of 81 indicates very high neighborhood walkability.
The facility’s continuing care model, above-average staffing investment, and sustained operational focus on correction suggest capacity for short-term rehabilitation and long-term private-pay placement despite citation frequency in recent years.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Daily nursing hours per resident by staff type, reported to CMS. Higher is generally better — compare this facility to state and national averages to see where staffing stands.
This home is ranked 18th out of 388 homes in New York. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
| Staff type | Hours / Day / Resident | vs state avg |
|---|---|---|
|
Registered Nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes.
| 1h 7m per day | ▲ 72% State avg: 39m per day · National avg: 41m per day |
|
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care.
| 1h 30m per day | ▲ 23% State avg: 1h 13m per day · National avg: 52m per day |
|
Nurse Aide
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life.
| 3h 23m per day | ▲ 28% State avg: 2h 38m per day · National avg: 2h 20m per day |
|
Weekend Total Nursing
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
| 3h 59m per day | ▼ 3% State avg: 4h 5m per day · National avg: 3h 26m per day |
|
Physical Therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
| 5m per day | ■ Avg State avg: 5m per day · National avg: 4m per day |
|
Weekend RN
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
| 55m per day | ▲ 83% State avg: 30m per day · National avg: 28m per day |
Lower than the New York average: 88.3%Canterbury Woods is legally operated by Episcopal Church Home and Affiliates Life Care Community, Inc (Not for Profit).
In New York, the Department of Health, Office of Aging and Long Term Care performs unannounced onsite inspections to monitor compliance with state and federal healthcare regulations.
A composite 0–100 score combining this facility's inspections, citations, complaints, and enforcement actions relative to the New York state average. See the nursing homes benchmark below for the typical New York score; higher is better.
Near the New York average for nursing homes.
New York nursing homes benchmark: C 74/100
Inspection score: 75 out of 100. Letter grade C. Near the New York average for nursing homes.
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the New York state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Inspections
| This Facility | NY Average | vs. NY Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all routine and focused inspections. Excludes complaint investigations.
| 8 | 9 | This facility has 11% fewer total inspections than a typical New York nursing home (8 vs. NY avg 9).↓ 11% better |
|
Inspections with citations
Inspections that resulted in at least one regulatory citation.
| 5 | 4 | This facility has 25% more inspections with citations than a typical New York nursing home (5 vs. NY avg 4).↑ 25% worse |
|
Inspection citation rate
Percentage of inspections that resulted in at least one citation.
| 63% | 44% | This facility has 19 percentage points higher inspection citation rate than a typical New York nursing home (63% vs. NY avg 44%).↑ 19% worse |
Citations
| This Facility | NY Average | vs. NY Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total citations
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 21 | 13 | This facility has 62% more total citations than a typical New York nursing home (21 vs. NY avg 13).↑ 62% worse |
|
Health citations
Violations related to resident care, clinical practices, and day-to-day operations.
| 16 | 20 | This facility has 20% fewer health citations than a typical New York nursing home (16 vs. NY avg 20).↓ 20% better |
|
Life safety citations
Violations related to building safety — fire prevention, emergency egress, and similar.
| 5 | 4 | This facility has 25% more life safety citations than a typical New York nursing home (5 vs. NY avg 4).↑ 25% worse |
|
Citations per year
Average citations per year since 2021.
| 4.2 | 2.6 | This facility has 62% more citations per year than a typical New York nursing home (4.2 vs. NY avg 2.6).↑ 62% worse |
|
Citations per inspection
Average citations per inspection.
| 2.6 | 1.4 | This facility has 86% more citations per inspection than a typical New York nursing home (2.6 vs. NY avg 1.4).↑ 86% worse |
Complaints & Investigations
| This Facility | NY Average | vs. NY Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total complaints
Formal expressions of concern made by residents, families, or staff.
| 38 | 79 | This facility has 52% fewer total complaints than a typical New York nursing home (38 vs. NY avg 79).↓ 52% better |
|
Complaints per year
Average complaints per year since 2021.
| 7.6 | 15.8 | This facility has 52% fewer complaints per year than a typical New York nursing home (7.6 vs. NY avg 15.8).↓ 52% better |
|
Complaints per bed
Size-adjusted complaint rate based on occupied beds.
| 0.92 | 0.50 | This facility has 84% more complaints per bed than a typical New York nursing home (0.92 vs. NY avg 0.5).↑ 84% worse |
|
Complaint investigations
On-site investigations triggered by complaints filed with New York regulators.
| 10 | 15 | This facility has 33% fewer complaint investigations than a typical New York nursing home (10 vs. NY avg 15).↓ 33% better |
An editor-reviewed summary of the themes and findings across this facility's recent inspection reports.
New York average 3.6
Last Health inspection on Jan 2025
New York average 18.5
New York average 5.05
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
7 of 9 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 2 of 9 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
100% better than New York averageNew York average: 0.2
100% better than New York averageNew York average: 0.2
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
How this facility protects residents through staff vaccination policies and immunization practices.
Percentage of facility employees vaccinated against influenza.
Summary of court-record activity tied to this facility, compiled from publicly available case dockets.
Source: State court e-filing records
Every lawsuit on record involving this facility since the earliest filing. Long-term volume signals overall legal exposure.
5
Lawsuits still moving through the courts. Active claims can affect day-to-day operations, settlement risk, and insurance posture.
1
Cases that have been disposed of — dismissed, settled, or decided. Shows how the facility has historically resolved disputes.
4
Year of the earliest case on record. A long history with steady filings suggests persistent issues; a recent first filing means newer exposure.
2003
Most recent filing on record. Recent activity means legal disputes are still being raised against this facility.
2025
Next scheduled court appearance on record across active cases.
Apr 24, 2026Reporting period: October 1 – December 31, 2025 (Q4 2025). Source: CMS Payroll-Based Journal report.
987% better than New York average
0% compared with New York average
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Manages medical care and health needs.
All 7 RN Staff are full-time employees. No contractors work on this role.
7
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
7.3 hoursAssists with medical care and medications.
20 total: 19 full-time employees and 1 contractor.
20
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
7.3 hoursHelps with daily care and mobility.
All 39 CNA Staff are full-time employees. No contractors work on this role.
39
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
7.5 hours
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Total hours from contractors
75 contractor hours this quarter
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
| Certified Nursing Assistant | 39 | 0 | 39 | 9,090 | 92 | 100% | 7.5 |
| Licensed Practical Nurse | 19 | 1 | 20 | 3,823 | 92 | 100% | 7.3 |
| Registered Nurse | 7 | 0 | 7 | 1,350 | 85 | 92% | 7.3 |
| Clinical Nurse Specialist | 3 | 0 | 3 | 829 | 67 | 73% | 7.8 |
| Respiratory Therapy Technician | 4 | 0 | 4 | 496 | 63 | 68% | 7.1 |
| Administrator | 1 | 0 | 1 | 468 | 59 | 64% | 7.9 |
| Physical Therapy Assistant | 4 | 0 | 4 | 452 | 63 | 68% | 7.2 |
| Nurse Practitioner | 1 | 0 | 1 | 392 | 49 | 53% | 8 |
| Speech Language Pathologist | 1 | 0 | 1 | 313 | 43 | 47% | 7.3 |
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials were reported in the last 3 years.
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
A composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and activities of daily living decline.
14.7
50% worse than New York averageNew York average: 9.8
A composite score based on activities of daily living decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence.
22.6
25% worse than New York averageNew York average: 18.1
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
23.1%
41% worse than New York averageNew York average: 16.4%
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
20.8%
26% worse than New York averageNew York average: 16.6%
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
23.8%
11% worse than New York averageNew York average: 21.4%
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.6%
121% worse than New York averageNew York average: 3.0%
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
10.3%
43% worse than New York averageNew York average: 7.2%
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.0%
184% worse than New York averageNew York average: 1.4%
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
12.9%
111% worse than New York averageNew York average: 6.1%
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
9.5%
48% better than New York averageNew York average: 18.1%
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
18.4%
46% worse than New York averageNew York average: 12.6%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.3%
9% better than New York averageNew York average: 91.4%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.4%
In line with New York averageNew York average: 95.2%
CMS star rating based on short-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = much above average, 1 star = much below average.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
88.2%
15% better than New York averageNew York average: 76.6%
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.6%
101% worse than New York averageNew York average: 1.3%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
85.7%
9% better than New York averageNew York average: 78.8%
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
34.8%
50% worse than New York averageNew York average: 23.2%
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
7.6%
32% better than New York averageNew York average: 11.2%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
100% better than New York averageNew York average: 0.8%
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
65.7%
22% better than New York averageNew York average: 53.7%
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
62.0%
23% better than New York averageNew York average: 50.6%
Quality measures are calculated from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. For most measures, lower percentages indicate better care quality.
23% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
77% of new residents, often for short stays.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jan 2026)
Total residents
42Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Part of a Continuing Care Retirement Community offering multiple care levels
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Historical financial and operational data for Canterbury Woods based on CMS SNF Cost Reports.
The portion of the home's budget spent on staff, including nurses, caregivers, and other employees who support care and operations.
Rank #215 / 383Payroll — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 215th out of 383 homes in New York. Shows total annual staff payroll benchmarked to the New York average. Higher payroll investment relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on cheaper contract labor.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
All remaining costs needed to run the home, such as food, utilities, building maintenance, supplies and administrative expenses.
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
0.0 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Williamsville's city center to Canterbury Woods's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Add your location
Canterbury Woods is located in Williamsville, New York.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in New York.
The legal owner and operator of Canterbury Woods is Episcopal Church Home and Affiliates Life Care Community, Inc (Not for Profit).
Canterbury Woods has a walk score of 81. Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
According to NY state health department records, Canterbury Woods's license number is 1421305N.
Canterbury Woods's occupancy is 82%.
Canterbury Woods has 50 beds.
Canterbury Woods has had 21 recently reported deficiencies.
Yes — there are 4 photos of Canterbury Woods in the photo gallery on this page.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Thank you for your interest!
Our team will be in touch shortly to help with next steps.
