Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
138
138 employees · 0 contractors · 54 on an average day Fiesta Park Wellness & Rehabilitation
Nursing Home, Palliative Care & Skilled Nursing · Albuquerque, NM
ALM Inspection Grade
B-
ALM's inspection grade is 82 / 100, a B- — in line with the New Mexico average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 82 / 100, a B- — in line with the New Mexico average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Community photos aren’t available yet.
To request photos, use the contact form below.
Fiesta Park Wellness & Rehabilitation
Nursing Home, Palliative Care & Skilled Nursing · Albuquerque, NM
ALM Inspection Grade
B-
ALM's inspection grade is 82 / 100, a B- — in line with the New Mexico average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 82 / 100, a B- — in line with the New Mexico average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Fiesta Park Wellness & Rehabilitation accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Overview of Fiesta Park Wellness & Rehabilitation
Fiesta Park Wellness & Rehabilitation operates a 105-bed nursing facility in Albuquerque, New Mexico, offering skilled nursing, palliative care, and respite care. Specialized palliative support addresses symptom relief, while temporary respite programs give primary family caregivers time away. Physical rehabilitation programs work alongside general medical oversight provided by a staff physician.
Daily operations run under the direction of administrator Kristina Mares. Total nurse staffing across the facility averages 3 hours and 55 minutes per resident each day. Dining services feature nutritionally balanced meals tailored to accommodate specific medical diets or religious dietary standards. Payment structures include Medicare, Medicaid, and direct private pay.
Prospective residents and their families can contact Fiesta Park Wellness & Rehabilitation to learn more about specific care programs, review accepted funding plans, and schedule an on-site visit of the area.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 19th out of 50 nursing homes we track in New Mexico for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 55m
This nursing home is ranked 19th out of 50 nursing homes we track in New Mexico for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 55mStandout metric: LPN / LVN is +63% above New Mexico average
2 of 6 metrics below New Mexico average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 6 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
6 staff · 9.6-hour shifts
23m
↓ 37% · NM 37mThis facility: 23m per resident per day, 37% below the New Mexico average of 37m (among New Mexico facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 6 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
6 staff · 9.6-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 21 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
21 staff · 8.9-hour shifts
1h 10m
↑ 63% · NM 43mThis facility: 1h 10m per resident per day, 63% above the New Mexico average of 43m (among New Mexico facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 21 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
21 staff · 8.9-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 52 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
52 staff · 9.2-hour shifts
2h 21m
↑ 5% · NM 2h 14mThis facility: 2h 21m per resident per day, 5% above the New Mexico average of 2h 14m (among New Mexico facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 52 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
52 staff · 9.2-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 21m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation. All 1 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
1 staff · 4.4-hour shifts
8m
↑ 52% · NM 5mThis facility: 8m per resident per day, 52% above the New Mexico average of 5m (among New Mexico facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation. All 1 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
1 staff · 4.4-hour shiftsUS average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
3h 29m
↑ 12% · NM 3h 7mThis facility: 3h 29m per resident per day, 12% above the New Mexico average of 3h 7m (among New Mexico facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
14m
↓ 49% · NM 28mThis facility: 14m per resident per day, 49% below the New Mexico average of 28m (among New Mexico facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
138
138 employees · 0 contractors · 54 on an average day
138 total staff / 104 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.33 : 1
↓ 14% · NM 1.55This facility: 1.33 staff per resident, 14% below the New Mexico average of 1.55 (among New Mexico facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
138 staff ÷ 104 residents
See full New Mexico ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8.7 h
↑ 1% · NM 8.6 hThis facility: 8.7 h, 1% above the New Mexico average of 8.6 h (among New Mexico facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
42,715 staff hours this quarter
See full New Mexico ranking →100% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
New Mexico average: 89.2% · No agency contractors this quarter
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
105
Rank #23 / 54Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 23rd out of 54 nursing homes we track in New Mexico for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other New Mexico facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New Mexico that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
105
Rank #23 / 54Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 23rd out of 54 nursing homes we track in New Mexico for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other New Mexico facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New Mexico that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
Walk Score
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #42 / 47Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 42nd out of 47 nursing homes we track in New Mexico for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across New Mexico facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New Mexico that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #42 / 47Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 42nd out of 47 nursing homes we track in New Mexico for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across New Mexico facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New Mexico that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
18
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy higher than 95% suggests steady demand, but availability may be limited.
Rank #1 / 43Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 1st out of 43 nursing homes we track in New Mexico for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the New Mexico average, with its Statewide rank out of 43. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New Mexico that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy higher than 95% suggests steady demand, but availability may be limited.
Rank #1 / 43Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 1st out of 43 nursing homes we track in New Mexico for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the New Mexico average, with its Statewide rank out of 43. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New Mexico that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
96.6%
This home is often near full
Based on 101.4 residents and 105 beds. Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Higher than the New Mexico average: 84.6%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
31
days
About This Community
Facility TypeNursing Home
CMS Certification Number325123
Fiesta Park Wellness & Rehabilitation is administered by Kristina Mares.
Owner NameFiesta Park Wellness & Rehabilitation
Resident Council
Doctor on Staff
Respite CareRespite care provides families and unpaid caregivers with short-term relief from caregiving duties. Care can range from a few hours to a few weeks.
Fax(505) 944-7090
Pets not allowed
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
82 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
In line with the New Mexico average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Typical
193 severity-weighted points (38 deficiencies) · 8% higher than the typical CMS-certified NM facility (median: 179)
Enforcement
Concern
3 enforcement actions · 3× more than the typical CMS-certified NM facility (median: 1) · $39,025 in fines
Persistence
Strong
19 days to fix issues · much faster than the typical CMS-certified NM facility (median: 39)
Total health inspections
7
↓ 10% · NM 7.8This facility: 7, 10% below the New Mexico average of 7.8 (among New Mexico facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
37
Rank #15 / 50Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 15th out of 50 nursing homes we track in New Mexico for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the New Mexico State average, with a ranking across all 50 NM facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New Mexico that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 26% · NM 49.9This facility: 37, 26% below the New Mexico average of 49.9 (among New Mexico facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
5.29
Rank #17 / 50Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 17th out of 50 nursing homes we track in New Mexico for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the New Mexico mean across 50 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New Mexico that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 18% · NM 6.48This facility: 5.29, 18% below the New Mexico average of 6.48 (among New Mexico facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
37 of 37 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
1
≈ 0% · NM 1This facility: 1, level with the New Mexico average of 1 (among New Mexico facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
2
↑ 100% · NM 1This facility: 2, 100% above the New Mexico average of 1 (among New Mexico facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
34
↓ 28% · NM 47.4This facility: 34, 28% below the New Mexico average of 47.4 (among New Mexico facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · NM 0.5This facility: 0, 100% below the New Mexico average of 0.5 (among New Mexico facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Jun 22, 2026 · 3 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Resident Assessment & Care Planning, 13 of 37 citations · 8 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Jun 22, 2026
3 citations
Quality of Care critical citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 20, 2026
10 citations
Abuse/Neglect serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Feb 19, 2026
3 citations
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 16, 2026
2 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
May 15, 2025
2 citations
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 16, 2025
10 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 09, 2023
7 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 37 citations
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
13 deficiencies (35%)
Resident Rights
5 deficiencies (14%)
Quality of Life & Care
5 deficiencies (14%)
Nutrition & Dietary
4 deficiencies (11%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
4 deficiencies (11%)
Pharmacy Services
3 deficiencies (8%)
Environmental
2 deficiencies (5%)
Infection Control
1 deficiency (3%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
25 of 37 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 12 of 37 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
3 penalties in the past 3 years
Latest: Jun 22, 2026 · $20,740 civil money penalty
Jun 22, 2026 · $20,740 civil money penalty
Jun 22, 2026 · $22,205 civil money penalty
Apr 20, 2026 · $9,347 civil money penalty
Total fines
$52,292
↓ 32% · NM $77KThis facility: $52,292, 32% below the New Mexico average of $77,311. Average among the 43 New Mexico facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #36 / 50Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 36th out of 50 nursing homes we track in New Mexico for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the New Mexico average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 50 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New Mexico that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
3
↑ 47% · NM 2.05This facility: 3, 47% above the New Mexico average of 2.05. Average among the 43 New Mexico facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
NM avg 0.47New Mexico average: 0.47. Average among the 43 New Mexico facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Jun 22, 2026
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$20,740
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$20,740
Jun 22, 2026
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$22,205
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$22,205
Apr 20, 2026
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$9,347
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$9,347Fine amount comparison
This facility
$52,292
New Mexico average
$77,311
US average
$66,281
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. New Mexico and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the New Mexico average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 33% · NM 3.8This facility: 5.0, 33% above the NM average of 3.8 (among NM facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
↑ 22% · NM 3.3This facility: 4.0, 22% above the NM average of 3.3 (among NM facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
6.4
Score · lower is better
↓ 2% · NM 6.5This facility: 6.4, 2% below the NM average of 6.5 (among NM facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
15.8
Score · lower is better
↑ 20% · NM 13.2This facility: 15.8, 20% above the NM average of 13.2 (among NM facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 8 better, 3 worse, 2 near NM average
8 short-stay measures: 4 better, 1 worse, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
9.0%
↓ 12% · NM 10.3This facility: 9.0, 12% below the NM average of 10.3 (among NM facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
9.0%
↓ 12% · NM 10.3This facility: 9.0, 12% below the NM average of 10.3 (among NM facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
15.3%
↑ 49% · NM 10.3This facility: 15.3, 49% above the NM average of 10.3 (among NM facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
15.3%
↑ 49% · NM 10.3This facility: 15.3, 49% above the NM average of 10.3 (among NM facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
23.1%
↑ 21% · NM 19.2This facility: 23.1, 21% above the NM average of 19.2 (among NM facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
23.1%
↑ 21% · NM 19.2This facility: 23.1, 21% above the NM average of 19.2 (among NM facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
↓ 100% · NM 1.0This facility: 0.0, 100% below the NM average of 1.0 (among NM facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
↓ 100% · NM 1.0This facility: 0.0, 100% below the NM average of 1.0 (among NM facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.5%
↓ 54% · NM 3.4This facility: 1.5, 54% below the NM average of 3.4 (among NM facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.5%
↓ 54% · NM 3.4This facility: 1.5, 54% below the NM average of 3.4 (among NM facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.7%
↓ 10% · NM 5.2This facility: 4.7, 10% below the NM average of 5.2 (among NM facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.7%
↓ 10% · NM 5.2This facility: 4.7, 10% below the NM average of 5.2 (among NM facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.3%
↓ 62% · NM 3.5This facility: 1.3, 62% below the NM average of 3.5 (among NM facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.3%
↓ 62% · NM 3.5This facility: 1.3, 62% below the NM average of 3.5 (among NM facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · NM 2.2This facility: 0.0, 100% below the NM average of 2.2 (among NM facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · NM 2.2This facility: 0.0, 100% below the NM average of 2.2 (among NM facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
4.1%
↓ 72% · NM 14.5This facility: 4.1, 72% below the NM average of 14.5 (among NM facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
4.1%
↓ 72% · NM 14.5This facility: 4.1, 72% below the NM average of 14.5 (among NM facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 4% · NM 96.1This facility: 100.0, 4% above the NM average of 96.1 (among NM facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 4% · NM 96.1This facility: 100.0, 4% above the NM average of 96.1 (among NM facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 4% · NM 95.8This facility: 100.0, 4% above the NM average of 95.8 (among NM facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 4% · NM 95.8This facility: 100.0, 4% above the NM average of 95.8 (among NM facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.76
↑ 71% · NM 1.61This facility: 2.76, 71% above the NM average of 1.61 (among NM facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.76
↑ 71% · NM 1.61This facility: 2.76, 71% above the NM average of 1.61 (among NM facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.86
↓ 30% · NM 2.64This facility: 1.86, 30% below the NM average of 2.64 (among NM facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.86
↓ 30% · NM 2.64This facility: 1.86, 30% below the NM average of 2.64 (among NM facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
56.2%
↑ 5% · US 53.7This facility: 56.2, 5% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
56.2%
↑ 5% · US 53.7This facility: 56.2, 5% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
64.5%
↑ 28% · US 50.6This facility: 64.5, 28% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
64.5%
↑ 28% · US 50.6This facility: 64.5, 28% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.6%
↓ 54% · NM 1.2This facility: 0.6, 54% below the NM average of 1.2 (among NM facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.6%
↓ 54% · NM 1.2This facility: 0.6, 54% below the NM average of 1.2 (among NM facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.0%
↑ 15% · NM 86.1This facility: 99.0, 15% above the NM average of 86.1 (among NM facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.0%
↑ 15% · NM 86.1This facility: 99.0, 15% above the NM average of 86.1 (among NM facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.5%
↑ 16% · NM 84.6This facility: 98.5, 16% above the NM average of 84.6 (among NM facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.5%
↑ 16% · NM 84.6This facility: 98.5, 16% above the NM average of 84.6 (among NM facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
22.9%
↑ 8% · NM 21.3This facility: 22.9, 8% above the NM average of 21.3 (among NM facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
22.9%
↑ 8% · NM 21.3This facility: 22.9, 8% above the NM average of 21.3 (among NM facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
14.3%
↓ 10% · NM 15.9This facility: 14.3, 10% below the NM average of 15.9 (among NM facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
14.3%
↓ 10% · NM 15.9This facility: 14.3, 10% below the NM average of 15.9 (among NM facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Fiesta Park Wellness & Rehabilitation’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 45 New Mexico nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Breaking even on care
1.6% operating margin
+5.2 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 5 of the last 8 reported years. Net income $0.3M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Payroll in line with New Mexico homes
50.1% payroll share of revenue
NM average 49.0%Rank #19 / 45Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 19th out of 45 nursing homes we track in New Mexico for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the New Mexico average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New Mexico that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll fell $0.4M while revenue rose $0.4M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with New Mexico homes.
Revenue & profit
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2015 → 2024Trend | NM median | Compared with NM homesRank in NM | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $16.8M | +$0.4M | Trend 20152024 | NM median $13.0M | Rank in NM Rank #10 / 45Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 10th out of 45 nursing homes we track in New Mexico for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the New Mexico average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New Mexico that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 80% of homes | Above NM median Higher net patient revenue than 80% of NM homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $16.5M | −$0.5M | Trend 20152024 | NM median $13.8M | Rank in NM Rank #11 / 45Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 11th out of 45 nursing homes we track in New Mexico for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other New Mexico homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New Mexico that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 77% of homes | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $0.3M | +$0.9M | Trend 20152024 | NM median −$0.3M | Rank in NM Rank #16 / 45Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 16th out of 45 nursing homes we track in New Mexico for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other New Mexico homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New Mexico that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 66% of homes | Profit, growing Resident care made money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 1.6% | +5.2 pts | Trend 20152024 | NM median −1.3% | Rank in NM Rank #16 / 45Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 16th out of 45 nursing homes we track in New Mexico for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other New Mexico homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New Mexico that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 66% of homes | Thin margin A margin from 0% to 5% of revenue leaves little room for unexpected costs. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.0M | — | Trend — | NM median $0.0M | Rank in NM Rank #24 / 42Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 24th out of 42 nursing homes we track in New Mexico for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other New Mexico homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New Mexico that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 44% of homes | Adds to profit Income from outside resident care, on top of the profit from care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $0.3M | +$0.8M | Trend — | NM median $0.1M | Rank in NM Rank #21 / 45Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 21st out of 45 nursing homes we track in New Mexico for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other New Mexico homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New Mexico that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 55% of homes | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Staff spending in line with New Mexico homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2015 → 2024Trend | NM median | Compared with NM homesRank in NM | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $8.4M | −$0.4M | Trend 20152024 | NM median $6.1M | Rank in NM Rank #6 / 45Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 6th out of 45 nursing homes we track in New Mexico for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the New Mexico average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New Mexico that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 89% of homes | Above NM median Higher payroll than 89% of NM homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 50.1% | −3.4 pts | Trend 20152024 | NM median 45.4% | Rank in NM Rank #19 / 45Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 19th out of 45 nursing homes we track in New Mexico for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the New Mexico average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New Mexico that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 59% of homes | Near NM average The NM average is 49.0% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2015–2024 2 charts · NM benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income No report
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the New Mexico payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin NM payroll average No report
Year-by-year data, 2015–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019no report | 2020 | 2021 | 2022no report | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $11.9M | $11.9M | $11.1M | $11.4M | $8.7M | $8.6M | $16.4M | $16.8M | ||
| Operating expenses | $11.5M | $10.5M | $10.8M | $11.2M | $10.0M | $9.9M | $17.0M | $16.5M | ||
| Net patient income | $0.4M | $1.4M | $0.4M | $0.2M | −$1.3M | −$1.3M | −$0.6M | $0.3M | ||
| Operating margin | 3.7% | 12.1% | 3.5% | 1.8% | −15.1% | −14.6% | −3.6% | 1.6% | ||
| Net income | $0.5M | $1.7M | $0.4M | $0.3M | −$0.1M | −$1.0M | −$0.6M | $0.3M | ||
| Payroll costs | $3.6M | $3.6M | $3.7M | $3.9M | $3.3M | $3.5M | $8.8M | $8.4M | ||
| Payroll share of revenue | 30.3% | 30.6% | 33.3% | 34.3% | 37.9% | 40.2% | 53.5% | 50.1% | ||
| Beds | 85 | 85 | 85 | 85 | 85 | 85 | 105 | 105 | ||
| Gross revenue | $17.4M | $16.1M | $16.2M | $17.0M | $16.0M | $13.3M | $21.4M | $17.0M | ||
| Salaries | $3.2M | $3.2M | $3.3M | $3.4M | $2.8M | $2.9M | $7.7M | $7.5M | ||
| Wage-related costs | $0.4M | $0.4M | $0.4M | $0.5M | $0.5M | $0.6M | $1.1M | $0.9M | ||
| Contract labor | — | — | — | $2.3M | — | — | $0.1M | $0.1M | ||
| Other operating costs | $7.9M | $6.8M | $7.0M | $7.3M | $6.7M | $6.4M | $8.2M | $8.1M | ||
| Net patient revenue per day | $487 | $516 | $499 | $486 | $485 | $474 | $464 | $468 | ||
| Cost per day | $469 | $454 | $482 | $477 | $558 | $543 | $480 | $461 | ||
| Average length of stay | 20.8 days | 19.9 days | 18.7 days | 19.6 days | 27.4 days | 30.9 days | 31.8 days | 31.3 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 7 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
1,132 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
257 · 23%
Medicaid
51 · 5%
Private pay & other
824 · 73%
Resident snapshot
104 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
20 · 19%
Medicaid
41 · 39%
Private pay & other
43 · 41%
Leaving
1,147 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
199 · 17%
Medicaid
80 · 7%
Private pay & other
868 · 76%
Primarily short stays
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Places of interest near Fiesta Park Wellness & Rehabilitation
8.1 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Albuquerque's city center to Fiesta Park Wellness & Rehabilitation's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Fiesta Park Wellness & Rehabilitation
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Albuquerque
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the NM Dept. of Health, senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The New Mexico average is: 49.0% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Advanced Health Care of Albuquerque | NH SNF | Albuquerque | 47
Facility
47
NM AVG
103
Rank
#49 / 54 | B+ |
96.6%
Facility
96.6%
NM AVG
84.6%
Rank
#1 / 43 | +14% | 3.97
Facility
3.97
NM AVG
3.99
Rank
#18 / 50 | -17% | -1% | $39.9k
Facility
$39.9k
NM AVG
$79.2k
Rank
#33 / 50 | 15
Facility
15
NM AVG
49.9
Rank
#1 / 50 | 3.8
Facility
3.8
NM AVG
6.5
Rank
#3 / 50 | 4 | 45 | - |
62
Facility
62
NM AVG
57
Rank
#25 / 47 | New Ahc Holdings, LLC | $10.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$10.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NM AVG
$13.7M
Rank
#36 / 45 | $5.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NM AVG
$6.6M
Rank
#31 / 45 | 52.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
52.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
NM AVG
49%
Rank
#17 / 45 | 325119 | ||||
| Odelia Healthcare | NH PC SNF | Ne Albuquerque (First Plaza) | 119
Facility
119
NM AVG
103
Rank
#18 / 54 | A |
96.5%
Facility
96.5%
NM AVG
84.6%
Rank
#3 / 43 | +14% | 3.74
Facility
3.74
NM AVG
3.99
Rank
#28 / 50 | +55% | -6% | $4.1k
Facility
$4.1k
NM AVG
$79.2k
Rank
#23 / 50 | 31
Facility
31
NM AVG
49.9
Rank
#9 / 50 | 5.2
Facility
5.2
NM AVG
6.5
Rank
#15 / 50 | 1 | 115 | - |
90
Facility
90
NM AVG
57
Rank
#1 / 47 | Odelia Healthcare LLC | $19.5MFiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
$19.5MFiscal year ending 08/2025
NM AVG
$13.7M
Rank
#5 / 45 | $9.4MFiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
$9.4MFiscal year ending 08/2025
NM AVG
$6.6M
Rank
#4 / 45 | 48.5%Fiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
48.5%Fiscal year ending 08/2025
NM AVG
49%
Rank
#20 / 45 | 325060 | ||||
| Bear Canyon Rehabilitation | NH HOS MC PC RC SNF | Albuquerque (Oso Grande) | 178
Facility
178
NM AVG
103
Rank
#3 / 54 | D |
73.9%
Facility
73.9%
NM AVG
84.6%
Rank
#37 / 43 | -13% | 4.10
Facility
4.10
NM AVG
3.99
Rank
#13 / 50 | -27% | +3% | $155.5k
Facility
$155.5k
NM AVG
$79.2k
Rank
#47 / 50 | 64
Facility
64
NM AVG
49.9
Rank
#37 / 50 | 4.6
Facility
4.6
NM AVG
6.5
Rank
#8 / 50 | 5 | 132 | - |
51
Facility
51
NM AVG
57
Rank
#34 / 47 | Karen Jenkins | $19.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$19.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NM AVG
$13.7M
Rank
#4 / 45 | $8.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NM AVG
$6.6M
Rank
#8 / 45 | 41.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
41.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
NM AVG
49%
Rank
#33 / 45 | 325125 | ||||
| Albuquerque Heights Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center | NH HOS MC PC RC SNF | Albuquerque (Hodgin) | 134
Facility
134
NM AVG
103
Rank
#7 / 54 | B- |
91.0%
Facility
91.0%
NM AVG
84.6%
Rank
#18 / 43 | +8% | 4.18
Facility
4.18
NM AVG
3.99
Rank
#11 / 50 | +20% | +5% | $8.2k
Facility
$8.2k
NM AVG
$79.2k
Rank
#24 / 50 | 83
Facility
83
NM AVG
49.9
Rank
#46 / 50 | 5.5
Facility
5.5
NM AVG
6.5
Rank
#19 / 50 | 1 | 122 | A+ |
73
Facility
73
NM AVG
57
Rank
#11 / 47 | Albuquerque Heights Healthcare & Rehab Center LLC | $19.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$19.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NM AVG
$13.7M
Rank
#3 / 45 | $9.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$9.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NM AVG
$6.6M
Rank
#5 / 45 | 45.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
45.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
NM AVG
49%
Rank
#23 / 45 | 325069 | ||||
| Fiesta Park Wellness & Rehabilitation | NH PC SNF | Ne Albuquerque | 105
Facility
105
NM AVG
103
Rank
#23 / 54 | B- |
96.6%
Facility
96.6%
NM AVG
84.6%
Rank
#1 / 43 | +14% | 3.92
Facility
3.92
NM AVG
3.99
Rank
#19 / 50 | -65% | -2% | $52.3k
Facility
$52.3k
NM AVG
$79.2k
Rank
#36 / 50 | 37
Facility
37
NM AVG
49.9
Rank
#15 / 50 | 5.3
Facility
5.3
NM AVG
6.5
Rank
#17 / 50 | 3 | 101 | - |
18
Facility
18
NM AVG
57
Rank
#42 / 47 | Fiesta Park Wellness & Rehabilitation | $16.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$16.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NM AVG
$13.7M
Rank
#10 / 45 | $8.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NM AVG
$6.6M
Rank
#6 / 45 | 50.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
50.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
NM AVG
49%
Rank
#19 / 45 | 325123 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other NM nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial assistance
Get financial aid guidance Programs that may help with care and living costs in New Mexico
Fiesta Park Wellness & Rehabilitation is in NE ALBUQUERQUE, New Mexico. These programs may support different care settings or living expenses. A listing does not confirm this community participates; our concierge team can help confirm.
VA Aid and Attendance (A&A) and Housebound Benefits
VA Aid and Attendance (A&A) and Housebound Benefits
- Who it is for
- Veterans or survivors with VA pension eligibility and an Aid and Attendance or Housebound medical need
- Income limit
- 2026 · Countable income is compared with the applicable maximum annual pension rate (MAPR), which varies by dependents and benefit category. For a veteran with one dependent and Aid and Attendance, MAPR is $34,488/year.
- Asset limit
- VA pension net-worth ceiling is $163,699 from December 1, 2025 through November 30, 2026. Net worth includes countable assets plus income for VA purposes; exclusions and transfer rules apply.
Eligibility
- General
- Aid and Attendance or Housebound is an increased VA pension rate for eligible veterans or surviving spouses who meet pension and additional care/disability requirements; it is not a stand-alone state benefit.
- NM specifics
- Federal VA pension rules apply nationwide.
What it provides
- Monthly pension is based on the applicable MAPR less countable annual income; divided by 12. Maximum annual veteran Aid and Attendance rates are $29,093 without dependents and $34,488 with one dependent; actual payments may be lower.
Turquoise Care Community Benefit
Turquoise Care Community Benefit
Eligibility
- General
- Medicaid members who qualify for nursing-facility services may receive Community Benefit services to remain at home, subject to eligibility and assessment.
- NM specifics
- Turquoise Care replaced Centennial Care on July 1, 2024; Community Benefit is provided through the Medicaid managed-care program.
What it provides
- Medicaid in-home care services for members who qualify for nursing-facility services but choose to remain at home.
National Family Caregiver Support Program
National Family Caregiver Support Program
- Who it is for
- Family or informal caregivers of an older adult
Eligibility
- General
- Family caregivers of older adults receive support through the New Mexico aging network.
What it provides
- Respite care; caregiver training; information and referral assistance; and counseling.
Older Americans Act (OAA) Services
Older Americans Act (OAA) Services
- Who it is for
- Adults 60+ looking for meals, in-home help or other local aging services
- Income limit
- No financial eligibility test for Older Americans Act Title III services.
- Asset limit
- No asset limit for Older Americans Act Title III services.
Eligibility
- General
- Adults age 60+ seeking Older Americans Act Title III services through the local Area Agency on Aging.
What it provides
- Older Americans Act Title III services include nutrition; health promotion and caregiver support.
Medicare Savings Program (MSP)
Medicare Savings Program (MSP)
- Who it is for
- Medicare beneficiaries with limited income who need help with premiums or cost sharing
Eligibility
- General
- Medicare beneficiary; the state determines the applicable Medicare Savings Program. QMB helps with premiums and Medicare cost sharing; SLMB and QI generally help with Part B premiums.
- NM specifics
- QI requires annual application and is funded first-come, first-served with priority for prior recipients. QMB, SLMB and QI confer Part D Extra Help.
What it provides
- QMB pays eligible Part A/Part B premiums and Medicare deductibles and cost sharing; SLMB and QI pay Part B premiums. The exact benefit depends on the approved program.
Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP)
Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP)
- Who it is for
- Income-eligible households responsible for home heating or energy costs
Eligibility
- General
- Income-eligible households with qualifying home-energy costs; the administering agency applies household-size and program eligibility rules.
What it provides
- Assistance with eligible home energy costs through the state LIHEAP program.
Property Tax Rebate for Seniors
Property Tax Rebate for Seniors
Eligibility
- General
- New Mexico provides a Property Tax Rebate for Persons 65 or Older; eligible low-income renters can qualify as well as homeowners. Filing and income calculations follow the applicable PIT-RC instructions.
- NM specifics
- Claim through the applicable PIT-RC schedule. Refund claims are generally permitted within three years from the end of the calendar year in which the tax was due; use the eligibility rules for the claimed tax year.
What it provides
- Property-tax rebate claimed through the New Mexico personal income-tax return; qualifying renters may also claim it.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Fiesta Park Wellness & Rehabilitation
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Who is the owner of Fiesta Park Wellness & Rehabilitation?
Fiesta Park Wellness & Rehabilitation is legally operated by Fiesta Park Wellness & Rehabilitation, and administered by Kristina Mares.
02 Is Fiesta Park Wellness & Rehabilitation in a walkable area?
Fiesta Park Wellness & Rehabilitation has a walk score of 18. Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
03 What is the occupancy rate at Fiesta Park Wellness & Rehabilitation?
Fiesta Park Wellness & Rehabilitation's occupancy is 96.6%.
04 Are pets allowed at Fiesta Park Wellness & Rehabilitation?
No, Fiesta Park Wellness & Rehabilitation has a no-pet policy.
05 What is the best email address for Fiesta Park Wellness & Rehabilitation?
The team at Fiesta Park Wellness & Rehabilitation can be reached at info@fiestaparkrehab.com.
06 Does Fiesta Park Wellness & Rehabilitation operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Fiesta Park Wellness & Rehabilitation is registered as a for-profit in NM.
07 Who is the administrator of Fiesta Park Wellness & Rehabilitation?
Kristina Mares is the administrator of Fiesta Park Wellness & Rehabilitation.
Updated on
