Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
163
146 employees · 17 contractors · 55 on an average day Fountainview Ctr for Alzheimer
Nursing Home, Hospice Care, Memory Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Atlanta, GA
ALM Inspection Grade
C-
ALM's inspection grade is 70 / 100, a C- — 14 points below the Georgia average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 70 / 100, a C- — 14 points below the Georgia average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Fountainview Ctr for Alzheimer
Nursing Home, Hospice Care, Memory Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Atlanta, GA
ALM Inspection Grade
C-
ALM's inspection grade is 70 / 100, a C- — 14 points below the Georgia average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 70 / 100, a C- — 14 points below the Georgia average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Fountainview Ctr for Alzheimer accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Overview of Fountainview Ctr for Alzheimer
Fountainview Ctr for Alzheimer provides nursing home, hospice care, memory care, respite care, and skilled nursing in Atlanta, Georgia. Memory care offers a supervised setting for people living with Alzheimer’s disease or other forms of dementia, while skilled nursing provides licensed nursing care on site around the clock. Hospice care supports residents receiving end of life care, and respite care provides a short stay when someone’s usual caregiver needs temporary relief.
This range suits a resident with Alzheimer’s or another form of dementia whose care needs require specialized support. Located in the Briarcliff Heights neighborhood, the community has 120 beds. A Walk Score of 80 means the area is very walkable, with most errands possible on foot, so a resident who no longer drives can still reach nearby destinations independently.
Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay are accepted, giving families those payment routes for an eligible stay. Total nurse staffing is 4 hours and 34 minutes per resident per day, representing the daily hands on nursing time assigned to each resident. Rehabilitation services and short term rehabilitation support recovery during a temporary stay, while the in house physician and geriatric psychiatrist provide medical and behavioral health support on site; the community also offers the “The Right Place, The Right Time, The Right Care” program. Mr Teddy Watts serves as the administrator.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 15th out of 169 nursing homes we track in Georgia for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 34m
This nursing home is ranked 15th out of 169 nursing homes we track in Georgia for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 34mStandout metric: Certified nursing assistant is +41% above Georgia average
3 of 6 metrics below Georgia average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 13 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
13 staff · 8.3-hour shifts
20m
↓ 31% · GA 29mThis facility: 20m per resident per day, 31% below the Georgia average of 29m (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 13 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
13 staff · 8.3-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 38 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
38 staff · 11.1-hour shifts
1h 11m
↑ 27% · GA 56mThis facility: 1h 11m per resident per day, 27% above the Georgia average of 56m (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 38 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
38 staff · 11.1-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 90 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
90 staff · 8.1-hour shifts
3h 2m
↑ 41% · GA 2h 9mThis facility: 3h 2m per resident per day, 41% above the Georgia average of 2h 9m (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 90 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
90 staff · 8.1-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 20m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 20m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
1m
↓ 69% · GA 3mThis facility: 1m per resident per day, 69% below the Georgia average of 3m (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
3h 55m
↑ 26% · GA 3h 6mThis facility: 3h 55m per resident per day, 26% above the Georgia average of 3h 6m (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
10m
↓ 51% · GA 20mThis facility: 10m per resident per day, 51% below the Georgia average of 20m (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 28m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 28m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
163
146 employees · 17 contractors · 55 on an average day
163 total staff / 115 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.42 : 1
↓ 1% · GA 1.43This facility: 1.42 staff per resident, 1% below the Georgia average of 1.43 (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
163 staff ÷ 115 residents
See full Georgia ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8.6 h
↑ 4% · GA 8.3 hThis facility: 8.6 h, 4% above the Georgia average of 8.3 h (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
43,032 staff hours this quarter
See full Georgia ranking →97% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Georgia average: 94.3% · Contractors this quarter: Physical Therapy Aide (5), Physical Therapy Assistant (4), Respiratory Therapy Technician (3), Qualified Social Worker (3), Speech Language Pathologist (2)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
120
Rank #68 / 206Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 68th out of 206 nursing homes we track in Georgia for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Georgia facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
120
Rank #68 / 206Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 68th out of 206 nursing homes we track in Georgia for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Georgia facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
Years of operating
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #8 / 189Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 8th out of 189 nursing homes we track in Georgia for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Georgia facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #8 / 189Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 8th out of 189 nursing homes we track in Georgia for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Georgia facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
54
years
Walk Score
Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
Rank #8 / 210Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 8th out of 210 nursing homes we track in Georgia for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Georgia facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
Rank #8 / 210Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 8th out of 210 nursing homes we track in Georgia for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Georgia facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
80
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #26 / 161Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 26th out of 161 nursing homes we track in Georgia for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Georgia average, with its Statewide rank out of 161. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #26 / 161Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 26th out of 161 nursing homes we track in Georgia for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Georgia average, with its Statewide rank out of 161. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
94.4%
This home usually has limited availability
Based on 113.3 residents and 120 beds. Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Higher than the Georgia average: 83.6%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
256
days
About This Community
Facility TypeNursing Home
StatusSnf/Nf Dual Cert
IssuanceApril 1, 1972
CountyDekalb
Fountainview Ctr for Alzheimer is administered by Mr. Teddy Watts.
Short-Term Rehab
Doctor on Staff
In-House Physician
Geriatric Psychiatrist
Respite CareRespite care provides families and unpaid caregivers with short-term relief from caregiving duties. Care can range from a few hours to a few weeks.
Email
tedd@fountainview.net
Pets not allowed
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
70 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
14 points below the Georgia average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Concern
141 severity-weighted points (14 deficiencies) · 3× higher than the typical CMS-certified GA facility (median: 51)
Enforcement
Concern
$45,465 in fines · 4 enforcement actions
Persistence
Typical
40 days to fix issues · faster than the typical CMS-certified GA facility (median: 44)
Total health inspections
4
↑ 14% · GA 3.5This facility: 4, 14% above the Georgia average of 3.5 (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
15
Rank #70 / 170Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 70th out of 170 nursing homes we track in Georgia for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Georgia State average, with a ranking across all 170 GA facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 11% · GA 16.9This facility: 15, 11% below the Georgia average of 16.9 (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
3.75
Rank #87 / 170Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 87th out of 170 nursing homes we track in Georgia for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Georgia mean across 170 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 20% · GA 4.7This facility: 3.75, 20% below the Georgia average of 4.7 (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
15 of 15 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
3
↑ 400% · GA 0.6This facility: 3, 400% above the Georgia average of 0.6 (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
1
↑ 100% · GA 0.5This facility: 1, 100% above the Georgia average of 0.5 (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
10
↓ 36% · GA 15.7This facility: 10, 36% below the Georgia average of 15.7 (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
1
↑ 900% · GA 0.1This facility: 1, 900% above the Georgia average of 0.1 (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Jul 30, 2026 · 1 citation (Infection Control, moderate), corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 4 of 15 citations · 7 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Jul 30, 2026
1 citation
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Aug 17, 2025
3 citations
Abuse/Neglect critical citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect critical citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning critical citation
Corrected
Corrected
May 16, 2025
5 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 18, 2024
6 citations
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 15 citations
Quality of Life & Care
4 deficiencies (27%)
Infection Control
3 deficiencies (20%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
3 deficiencies (20%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
2 deficiencies (13%)
Resident Rights
1 deficiency (7%)
Nutrition & Dietary
1 deficiency (7%)
Nursing & Physician Services
1 deficiency (7%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
12 of 15 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 3 of 15 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
4 penalties in the past 3 years
Latest: Aug 17, 2025 · $33,430 civil money penalty
Aug 17, 2025 · $33,430 civil money penalty
Jan 18, 2024 · $4,017 civil money penalty
Jan 18, 2024 · $8,018 civil money penalty
Jan 18, 2024 · 7-day payment denial
Total fines
$45,465
↑ 29% · GA $35KThis facility: $45,465, 29% above the Georgia average of $35,339. Average among the 124 Georgia facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #158 / 172Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 158th out of 172 nursing homes we track in Georgia for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Georgia average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 172 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
3
↑ 87% · GA 1.6This facility: 3, 87% above the Georgia average of 1.6. Average among the 124 Georgia facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
1
7 days
↑ 188% · GA 0.35This facility: 1, 188% above the Georgia average of 0.35. Average among the 124 Georgia facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Aug 17, 2025
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$33,430
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$33,430
Jan 18, 2024
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,017
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,017
Jan 18, 2024
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$8,018
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$8,018
Jan 18, 2024
Payment denial
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
New admissions not paid
7 days
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
New admissions not paid
7 daysFine amount comparison
This facility
$45,465
Georgia average
$35,339
US average
$66,281
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Georgia and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Georgia average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
2
/ 5
Below average
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
5.6
Score · lower is better
↓ 34% · GA 8.5This facility: 5.6, 34% below the GA average of 8.5 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
8.8
Score · lower is better
↓ 40% · GA 14.7This facility: 8.8, 40% below the GA average of 14.7 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 7 better, 4 worse, 2 near GA average
6 short-stay measures: 1 worse, 1 near GA average, 3 compared with US only, 1 without a benchmark
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
6.6%
↓ 56% · GA 14.9This facility: 6.6, 56% below the GA average of 14.9 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
6.6%
↓ 56% · GA 14.9This facility: 6.6, 56% below the GA average of 14.9 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
5.7%
↓ 59% · GA 13.7This facility: 5.7, 59% below the GA average of 13.7 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
5.7%
↓ 59% · GA 13.7This facility: 5.7, 59% below the GA average of 13.7 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
14.2%
↓ 8% · GA 15.4This facility: 14.2, 8% below the GA average of 15.4 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
14.2%
↓ 8% · GA 15.4This facility: 14.2, 8% below the GA average of 15.4 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
↓ 100% · GA 2.4This facility: 0.0, 100% below the GA average of 2.4 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
↓ 100% · GA 2.4This facility: 0.0, 100% below the GA average of 2.4 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.0%
↑ 24% · GA 3.2This facility: 4.0, 24% above the GA average of 3.2 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.0%
↑ 24% · GA 3.2This facility: 4.0, 24% above the GA average of 3.2 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.0%
↑ 10% · GA 5.4This facility: 6.0, 10% above the GA average of 5.4 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.0%
↑ 10% · GA 5.4This facility: 6.0, 10% above the GA average of 5.4 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.5%
↑ 2% · GA 5.4This facility: 5.5, 2% above the GA average of 5.4 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.5%
↑ 2% · GA 5.4This facility: 5.5, 2% above the GA average of 5.4 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · GA 11.7This facility: 0.0, 100% below the GA average of 11.7 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · GA 11.7This facility: 0.0, 100% below the GA average of 11.7 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
39.3%
↑ 99% · GA 19.8This facility: 39.3, 99% above the GA average of 19.8 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
39.3%
↑ 99% · GA 19.8This facility: 39.3, 99% above the GA average of 19.8 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
78.5%
↓ 14% · GA 91.7This facility: 78.5, 14% below the GA average of 91.7 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
78.5%
↓ 14% · GA 91.7This facility: 78.5, 14% below the GA average of 91.7 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.5%
↑ 1% · GA 94.6This facility: 95.5, 1% above the GA average of 94.6 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.5%
↑ 1% · GA 94.6This facility: 95.5, 1% above the GA average of 94.6 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.21
↓ 44% · GA 2.18This facility: 1.21, 44% below the GA average of 2.18 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.21
↓ 44% · GA 2.18This facility: 1.21, 44% below the GA average of 2.18 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.61
↓ 69% · GA 1.97This facility: 0.61, 69% below the GA average of 1.97 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.61
↓ 69% · GA 1.97This facility: 0.61, 69% below the GA average of 1.97 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 6 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
53.6%
≈ 0% · US 53.7This facility: 53.6, level with the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
53.6%
≈ 0% · US 53.7This facility: 53.6, level with the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
34.8%
↓ 31% · US 50.6This facility: 34.8, 31% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
34.8%
↓ 31% · US 50.6This facility: 34.8, 31% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
14.3%
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
14.3%
Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
75.6%
↓ 6% · GA 80.6This facility: 75.6, 6% below the GA average of 80.6 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
75.6%
↓ 6% · GA 80.6This facility: 75.6, 6% below the GA average of 80.6 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
80.5%
↑ 2% · GA 78.7This facility: 80.5, 2% above the GA average of 78.7 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
80.5%
↑ 2% · GA 78.7This facility: 80.5, 2% above the GA average of 78.7 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Fountainview Ctr for Alzheimer’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 164 Georgia nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Profitable on care
6.7% operating margin
+1.9 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 8 of the last 8 reported years. Net income −$0.0M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Payroll in line with Georgia homes
58.0% payroll share of revenue
GA average 56.1%Rank #44 / 164Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 44th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Georgia for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Georgia average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.4M while revenue rose $0.8M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Georgia homes.
Revenue & profit
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | GA median | Compared with GA homesRank in GA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $12.6M | +$0.8M | Trend 20172024 | GA median $10.4M | Rank in GA Rank #64 / 164Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 64th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Georgia for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Georgia average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 61% of homes | Above GA median Higher net patient revenue than 61% of GA homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $11.7M | +$0.5M | Trend 20172024 | GA median $11.3M | Rank in GA Rank #76 / 164Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 76th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Georgia for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Georgia homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 54% of homes | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $0.8M | +$0.3M | Trend 20172024 | GA median −$0.1M | Rank in GA Rank #28 / 164Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 28th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Georgia for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Georgia homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 83% of homes | Profit, growing Resident care made money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 6.7% | +1.9 pts | Trend 20172024 | GA median −1.3% | Rank in GA Rank #28 / 164Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 28th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Georgia for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Georgia homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 83% of homes | Healthy margin More than 5% of revenue is left after operating expenses. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.2M | — | Trend — | GA median $0.1M | Rank in GA Rank #36 / 162Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 36th out of 162 nursing homes we track in Georgia for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Georgia homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 78% of homes | Adds to profit Income from outside resident care, on top of the profit from care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$0.0M | +$0.3M | Trend — | GA median $0.0M | Rank in GA Rank #85 / 164Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 85th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Georgia for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Georgia homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 48% of homes | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Staff spending in line with Georgia homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | GA median | Compared with GA homesRank in GA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $7.3M | +$0.4M | Trend 20172024 | GA median $5.5M | Rank in GA Rank #51 / 164Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 51st out of 164 nursing homes we track in Georgia for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Georgia average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 69% of homes | Above GA median Higher payroll than 69% of GA homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 58.0% | −0.8 pts | Trend 20172024 | GA median 51.6% | Rank in GA Rank #44 / 164Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 44th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Georgia for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Georgia average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 74% of homes | Near GA average The GA average is 56.1% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · GA benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Georgia payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin GA payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $10.3M | $10.7M | $11.5M | $11.0M | $9.9M | $10.6M | $11.7M | $12.6M |
| Operating expenses | $9.2M | $9.8M | $10.1M | $10.3M | $9.7M | $10.1M | $11.2M | $11.7M |
| Net patient income | $1.1M | $0.9M | $1.4M | $0.7M | $0.2M | $0.4M | $0.6M | $0.8M |
| Operating margin | 10.3% | 8.7% | 12.5% | 6.7% | 2.4% | 4.2% | 4.8% | 6.7% |
| Net income | $0.6M | $0.5M | $1.0M | $0.9M | $1.5M | −$0.1M | −$0.3M | −$0.0M |
| Payroll costs | $5.7M | $6.1M | $6.1M | $6.0M | $5.5M | $6.1M | $6.9M | $7.3M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 55.3% | 56.6% | 53.1% | 54.2% | 55.5% | 57.2% | 58.8% | 58.0% |
| Beds | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 |
| Gross revenue | $12.4M | $13.0M | $13.4M | $12.7M | $11.3M | $11.7M | $13.1M | $13.5M |
| Salaries | $4.8M | $5.1M | $5.2M | $5.1M | $4.6M | $5.2M | $6.0M | $6.3M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.9M | $1.0M | $0.9M | $0.8M | $0.9M | $0.9M | $0.9M | $1.0M |
| Contract labor | $0.4M | $0.6M | $0.7M | $0.9M | $0.9M | $0.8M | $0.7M | $0.5M |
| Other operating costs | $3.5M | $3.7M | $4.0M | $4.3M | $4.2M | $4.1M | $4.3M | $4.4M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $245 | $251 | $276 | $287 | $300 | $298 | $353 | $334 |
| Cost per day | $220 | $229 | $241 | $267 | $293 | $285 | $336 | $312 |
| Average length of stay | 1,026.0 days | 460.2 days | 324.2 days | 331.2 days | 389.4 days | 755.5 days | 1,009.0 days | 255.8 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
140 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
55 · 39%
Medicaid
6 · 4%
Private pay & other
79 · 56%
Resident snapshot
115 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
6 · 5%
Medicaid
51 · 44%
Private pay & other
58 · 50%
Leaving
147 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
31 · 21%
Medicaid
23 · 16%
Private pay & other
93 · 63%
Mix of rehab and long-term care
This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.
Places of interest near Fountainview Ctr for Alzheimer
6.4 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Atlanta's city center to Fountainview Ctr for Alzheimer's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Fountainview Ctr for Alzheimer
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Atlanta
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the GA Dept. of Community Health (DCH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Georgia average is: 56.1% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The William Breman Jewish Home | NH SNF | Atlanta (Buckhead) | 96
Facility
96
GA AVG
113
Rank
#125 / 206 | A+ |
91.0%
Facility
91.0%
GA AVG
83.6%
Rank
#49 / 161 | +9% | 4.73
Facility
4.73
GA AVG
3.58
Rank
#14 / 169 | -59% | +32% | $0
Facility
$0
GA AVG
$40.0k
Rank
#1 / 172 | 7
Facility
7
GA AVG
16.9
Rank
#20 / 170 | 2.3
Facility
2.3
GA AVG
4.7
Rank
#15 / 170 | - | 87 | A+ |
23
Facility
23
GA AVG
44
Rank
#164 / 210 | Jeffrey Gopen | $14.2MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$14.2MFiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
$13.5M
Rank
#53 / 164 | $8.8MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$8.8MFiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
$6.0M
Rank
#23 / 164 | 62.2%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
62.2%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
56.1%
Rank
#26 / 164 | 115022 | ||||
| The A.G. Rhodes Wesley Woods | NH MC SNF | Atlanta (Victoria Estates) | 150
Facility
150
GA AVG
113
Rank
#46 / 206 | A- |
83.9%
Facility
83.9%
GA AVG
83.6%
Rank
#100 / 161 | 0% | 4.55
Facility
4.55
GA AVG
3.58
Rank
#15 / 169 | +9% | +27% | $8.0k
Facility
$8.0k
GA AVG
$40.0k
Rank
#124 / 172 | 13
Facility
13
GA AVG
16.9
Rank
#61 / 170 | 4.3
Facility
4.3
GA AVG
4.7
Rank
#72 / 170 | 1 | 126 | - |
46
Facility
46
GA AVG
44
Rank
#112 / 210 | Christina Phangestu | $19.7MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$19.7MFiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
$13.5M
Rank
#17 / 164 | $9.6MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$9.6MFiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
$6.0M
Rank
#19 / 164 | 48.8%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
48.8%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
56.1%
Rank
#107 / 164 | 115002 | ||||
| Pruitthealth – Virginia Park | NH HOS SNF | Atlanta (Druid Hills) | 128
Facility
128
GA AVG
113
Rank
#60 / 206 | C |
88.0%
Facility
88.0%
GA AVG
83.6%
Rank
#77 / 161 | +5% | 3.23
Facility
3.23
GA AVG
3.58
Rank
#107 / 169 | -27% | -10% | $8.8k
Facility
$8.8k
GA AVG
$40.0k
Rank
#128 / 172 | 19
Facility
19
GA AVG
16.9
Rank
#101 / 170 | 6.3
Facility
6.3
GA AVG
4.7
Rank
#131 / 170 | 4 | 113 | - |
50
Facility
50
GA AVG
44
Rank
#99 / 210 | Anthony Grant | $13.5MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$13.5MFiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
$13.5M
Rank
#58 / 164 | $7.3MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$7.3MFiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
$6.0M
Rank
#49 / 164 | 54.4%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
54.4%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
56.1%
Rank
#63 / 164 | 115531 | ||||
| Budd Terrace | NH SNF | Atlanta (Clifton Road Northeast) | 250
Facility
250
GA AVG
113
Rank
#5 / 206 | C |
89.3%
Facility
89.3%
GA AVG
83.6%
Rank
#65 / 161 | +7% | 4.14
Facility
4.14
GA AVG
3.58
Rank
#21 / 169 | +113% | +16% | $0
Facility
$0
GA AVG
$40.0k
Rank
#1 / 172 | 32
Facility
32
GA AVG
16.9
Rank
#161 / 170 | 8.0
Facility
8.0
GA AVG
4.7
Rank
#143 / 170 | - | 223 | - |
51
Facility
51
GA AVG
44
Rank
#95 / 210 | John Pulliam | $21.6MFiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
$21.6MFiscal year ending 08/2025
GA AVG
$13.5M
Rank
#9 / 164 | $11.1MFiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
$11.1MFiscal year ending 08/2025
GA AVG
$6.0M
Rank
#9 / 164 | 51.3%Fiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
51.3%Fiscal year ending 08/2025
GA AVG
56.1%
Rank
#87 / 164 | 115682 | ||||
| Fountainview Ctr for Alzheimer | NH HOS MC RC SNF | E Atlanta (Briarcliff Heights) | 120
Facility
120
GA AVG
113
Rank
#68 / 206 | C- |
94.4%
Facility
94.4%
GA AVG
83.6%
Rank
#26 / 161 | +13% | 4.56
Facility
4.56
GA AVG
3.58
Rank
#15 / 169 | -6% | +28% | $45.5k
Facility
$45.5k
GA AVG
$40.0k
Rank
#158 / 172 | 15
Facility
15
GA AVG
16.9
Rank
#70 / 170 | 3.8
Facility
3.8
GA AVG
4.7
Rank
#87 / 170 | 4 | 113 | - |
80
Facility
80
GA AVG
44
Rank
#8 / 210 | David Small | $12.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$12.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
GA AVG
$13.5M
Rank
#64 / 164 | $7.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
GA AVG
$6.0M
Rank
#51 / 164 | 58%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
58%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
GA AVG
56.1%
Rank
#44 / 164 | 115697 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other GA nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Georgia
Fountainview Ctr for Alzheimer is located in E ATLANTA, Georgia.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Georgia.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Fountainview Ctr for Alzheimer
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 What neighborhood is Fountainview Ctr for Alzheimer in?
Fountainview Ctr for Alzheimer is in the Briarcliff Heights neighborhood of ATLANTA.
02 Is Fountainview Ctr for Alzheimer in a walkable area?
Fountainview Ctr for Alzheimer has a walk score of 80. Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
03 What is the occupancy rate at Fountainview Ctr for Alzheimer?
Fountainview Ctr for Alzheimer's occupancy is 94.4%.
04 How long has Fountainview Ctr for Alzheimer been in business?
Fountainview Ctr for Alzheimer has been operating for approximately 54 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
05 Are pets allowed at Fountainview Ctr for Alzheimer?
No, Fountainview Ctr for Alzheimer has a no-pet policy.
06 What is the best email address for Fountainview Ctr for Alzheimer?
The team at Fountainview Ctr for Alzheimer can be reached at info@thefountainviewcenter.com.
07 Does Fountainview Ctr for Alzheimer operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Fountainview Ctr for Alzheimer is registered as a for-profit in GA.
Updated on
