Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
110
82 employees · 28 contractors · 48 on an average day Friendship Village of Bloomington
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Continuing Care Retirement Community, Independent Living, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Bloomington, MN
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Friendship Village of Bloomington
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Continuing Care Retirement Community, Independent Living, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Bloomington, MN
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Friendship Village of Bloomington accepts Medicare and private pay.
Overview of Friendship Village of Bloomington
Friendship Village of Bloomington offers nursing home, assisted living, continuing care retirement community, independent living, memory care, and skilled nursing in Bloomington, Minnesota. The range of care is broad. Independent living provides a private residence with community services and no daily care, while assisted living adds help with daily tasks such as dressing, bathing, and taking medication. Memory care is secured and supervised, and nursing home and skilled nursing care provide licensed nursing care on site around the clock.
Because the community offers several care levels, it may be a good fit for a resident whose needs may grow over time without leaving the community. Respite care provides a short stay when a usual caregiver needs time to travel or recover. Short term rehabilitation supports a temporary recovery stay.
Friendship Village of Bloomington has 85 beds and offers one bedroom and two bedroom housing options. A two bedroom residence may suit a couple moving together or someone who wants a companion. Total nurse staffing is 4 hours and 46 minutes per resident each day, representing the daily hands on nursing time allocated to each resident.
Medicare and private pay are accepted. Rehabilitation services are available on site, so a resident can receive rehab without arranging transportation elsewhere. The community also has a pool for swimming or water based activity. Pets are allowed, and clubs and social groups give residents organized ways to take part in shared activities.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 42nd out of 63 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 46m
This nursing home is ranked 42nd out of 63 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 46mStandout metric: Physical therapist is +74% above Minnesota average
1 of 6 metrics below Minnesota average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 16 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
16 staff · 7.8-hour shifts
1h 23m
↑ 30% · MN 1h 4mThis facility: 1h 23m per resident per day, 30% above the Minnesota average of 1h 4m (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 16 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
16 staff · 7.8-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 6 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
6 staff · 8.2-hour shifts
34m
↓ 8% · MN 37mThis facility: 34m per resident per day, 8% below the Minnesota average of 37m (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 6 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
6 staff · 8.2-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 48 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
48 staff · 7.8-hour shifts
2h 49m
↑ 10% · MN 2h 33mThis facility: 2h 49m per resident per day, 10% above the Minnesota average of 2h 33m (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 48 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
48 staff · 7.8-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 20m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 20m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
7m
↑ 74% · MN 4mThis facility: 7m per resident per day, 74% above the Minnesota average of 4m (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
4h 9m
↑ 13% · MN 3h 41mThis facility: 4h 9m per resident per day, 13% above the Minnesota average of 3h 41m (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
58m
↑ 42% · MN 41mThis facility: 58m per resident per day, 42% above the Minnesota average of 41m (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 28m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 28m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
110
82 employees · 28 contractors · 48 on an average day
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7 h
↓ 7% · MN 7.5 hThis facility: 7 h, 7% below the Minnesota average of 7.5 h (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
30,842 staff hours this quarter
See full Minnesota ranking →87.2% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Minnesota average: 90.3% · Contractors this quarter: Speech Language Pathologist (6), Respiratory Therapy Technician (6), Qualified Social Worker (6), Physical Therapy Assistant (4), Physical Therapy Aide (3), Medical Director (1), Therapeutic Recreation Specialist (1), Occupational Therapy Aide (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
85
Rank #38 / 94Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 38th out of 94 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Minnesota facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
85
Rank #38 / 94Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 38th out of 94 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Minnesota facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Years of operating
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #1 / 14Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 1st out of 14 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Minnesota facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #1 / 14Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 1st out of 14 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Minnesota facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
47
years
Walk Score
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #92 / 104Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 92nd out of 104 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Minnesota facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #92 / 104Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 92nd out of 104 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Minnesota facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
16
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #26 / 61Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 26th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Minnesota average, with its Statewide rank out of 61. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #26 / 61Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 26th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Minnesota average, with its Statewide rank out of 61. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
84.7%
This home usually has availability
Based on 72 residents and 85 beds. Source: state inspection report (Mar 2025)
Higher than the Minnesota average: 78.4%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
82
days
About This Community
Pricing & Financial Information
The below pricing was updated on
$4,410/Month
StatusApproved For Dementia Care
CountyHennepin
CMS Certification Number245229
Newsweek Best CCRC Recognition 2026
Profit StatusNonprofit
Short-Term Rehab
Medication ManagementSupport with organizing, administering, and monitoring medicines can help prevent missed or incorrect doses.
Respite CareRespite care provides families and unpaid caregivers with short-term relief from caregiving duties. Care can range from a few hours to a few weeks.
Priority Access To On-Site Health Services (Life Care)
Move-In Coordinator
Companion and Homemaker Services
MaintenanceListed as: 24/7 on-call maintenance
HousekeepingListed as: Weekly housekeeping and linen service
Laundry & Linen
Emergency Call System
24-Hour Security
TransportationListed as: Private car service/scheduled transportation
ConciergeListed as: Senior concierge/personal assistant services
Pets Allowed
Minimum Age62 Years Old
Laundry
Banking
Beauty Salon
Putting Green
Workshop
Hot Tub
Complimentary Self-Service Car Wash
Golf Simulator (40 Worldwide Courses)
Putting Green and Golf Simulator
Activities
Group Outings
Woodworking
Gardening (Resident Garden Plots)
Card Games
Clubs & Social Groups
Dining & Nutrition
Sourced directly from the team at Friendship Village of Bloomington.
Dining & Nutrition
Sourced directly from the team at Friendship Village of Bloomington.- Bistro / café on site.
- Multiple dining venues.
Building TypeMid-rise
1 Bedroom Floor plans as listed by the community: Kingsdale (1,014 sq ft) · Ramsey (1,001 sq ft) · Dover (953 sq ft)
Floor plans: Kingsdale, Ramsey, Dover
953–1,014 sq ft
2 Bedroom Floor plans as listed by the community: Hyland (1,410 sq ft) · Oxbow (1,404 sq ft)
Floor plans: Hyland, Oxbow
1,404–1,410 sq ft
In-Room Features
Washer And Dryer In Every Residence
Private Balcony (Select Units)
This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ. Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file — covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification surveys.
Inspection History
In Minnesota, the Department of Health, Health Regulation Division is the primary authority for conducting onsite inspections and reporting on the quality of care in residential facilities.
Since 2025 · 1 year of data
These figures come from state-published data and the state inspection reports we hold on file. The period covered can vary depending on document availability.
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 6 deficiencies 1 inspection
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 6 deficiencies 1 inspection
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Minnesota state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Since 2025 vs. Minnesota state average
Overall vs. MN average
0 Worse
No metrics in this bucket.
2 Better
Metrics better than Minnesota average:
• Total deficiencies (40% below)
• Deficiencies per inspection (42% below)
• Total deficiencies (40% below)
• Deficiencies per inspection (42% below)
Deficiencies
| This Facility | MN Average | vs. MN Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 6 | 10.0 | This facility has 40% fewer total deficiencies than a typical Minnesota nursing home (6 vs. MN avg 10).↓ 40% better |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
Average deficiencies per inspection.
| 6.0 | 10.3 | This facility has 42% fewer deficiencies per inspection than a typical Minnesota nursing home (6 vs. MN avg 10.3).↓ 42% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | MN Average | vs. MN Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 1 | 1.0 | This facility has total inspections in line with the Minnesota average (1 vs. MN avg 1).— At avg |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Total health inspections
3
↓ 49% · MN 5.9This facility: 3, 49% below the Minnesota average of 5.9 (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
23
Rank #27 / 66Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 27th out of 66 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Minnesota State average, with a ranking across all 66 MN facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 2% · MN 23.4This facility: 23, 2% below the Minnesota average of 23.4 (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
7.67
Rank #61 / 66Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 61st out of 66 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Minnesota mean across 66 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 96% · MN 3.92This facility: 7.67, 96% above the Minnesota average of 3.92 (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
23 of 23 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
1
↑ 43% · MN 0.7This facility: 1, 43% above the Minnesota average of 0.7 (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · MN 0.6This facility: 0, 100% below the Minnesota average of 0.6 (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
21
↓ 1% · MN 21.3This facility: 21, 1% below the Minnesota average of 21.3 (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
1
↑ 43% · MN 0.7This facility: 1, 43% above the Minnesota average of 0.7 (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: May 07, 2026 · 10 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 10 of 23 citations · 6 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
May 07, 2026
10 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 27, 2025
4 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
May 02, 2024
9 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect critical citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 23 citations
Quality of Life & Care
10 deficiencies (43%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
5 deficiencies (22%)
Infection Control
2 deficiencies (9%)
Resident Rights
2 deficiencies (9%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
2 deficiencies (9%)
Pharmacy Services
2 deficiencies (9%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
21 of 23 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 2 of 23 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Lawsuit overview for Friendship Village of Bloomington
Summary of court-record activity tied to this facility, compiled from publicly available case dockets.
Source: State court e-filing records
Total Cases
Every lawsuit on record involving this facility since the earliest filing. Long-term volume signals overall legal exposure.
5
Every lawsuit on record involving this facility since the earliest filing. Long-term volume signals overall legal exposure.
5
Lawsuits
Total lawsuits on record, broken down by case type. Distinguishes lawsuits from other court filings such as probate documents.
5
Employment (3)Condemnation Appeal (1)Contract (1)
Total lawsuits on record, broken down by case type. Distinguishes lawsuits from other court filings such as probate documents.
5
Employment (3)Condemnation Appeal (1)Contract (1)
Active Cases
Lawsuits still moving through the courts. Active claims can affect day-to-day operations, settlement risk, and insurance posture.
0
Lawsuits still moving through the courts. Active claims can affect day-to-day operations, settlement risk, and insurance posture.
0
Closed
Cases that have been disposed of — dismissed, settled, or decided. Shows how the facility has historically resolved disputes.
5
Cases that have been disposed of — dismissed, settled, or decided. Shows how the facility has historically resolved disputes.
5
Most Recent
Most recent filing on record. Recent activity means legal disputes are still being raised against this facility.
12/10/2014
Most recent filing on record. Recent activity means legal disputes are still being raised against this facility.
12/10/2014
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
1 penalty in the past 3 years
Latest: May 2, 2024 · $99,500 civil money penalty
May 2, 2024 · $99,500 civil money penalty
Total fines
$99,500
↑ 99% · MN $50KThis facility: $99,500, 99% above the Minnesota average of $49,948. Average among the 156 Minnesota facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #57 / 66Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 57th out of 66 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Minnesota average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 66 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
1
↓ 46% · MN 1.84This facility: 1, 46% below the Minnesota average of 1.84. Average among the 156 Minnesota facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
MN avg 0.4Minnesota average: 0.4. Average among the 156 Minnesota facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
May 2, 2024
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$99,500
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$99,500Fine amount comparison
This facility
$99,500
Minnesota average
$49,948
US average
$67,417
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Minnesota and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Minnesota average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 89% · MN 2.6This facility: 5.0, 89% above the MN average of 2.6 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
↑ 31% · MN 3.1This facility: 4.0, 31% above the MN average of 3.1 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
8.8
Score · lower is better
↓ 15% · MN 10.3This facility: 8.8, 15% below the MN average of 10.3 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
17.0
Score · lower is better
↓ 19% · MN 21.0This facility: 17.0, 19% below the MN average of 21.0 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 8 better, 2 worse, 3 near MN average
8 short-stay measures: 1 better, 3 worse, 1 near MN average, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
9.7%
↓ 47% · MN 18.2This facility: 9.7, 47% below the MN average of 18.2 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
9.7%
↓ 47% · MN 18.2This facility: 9.7, 47% below the MN average of 18.2 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
20.9%
↑ 2% · MN 20.5This facility: 20.9, 2% above the MN average of 20.5 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
20.9%
↑ 2% · MN 20.5This facility: 20.9, 2% above the MN average of 20.5 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
20.4%
↓ 17% · MN 24.5This facility: 20.4, 17% below the MN average of 24.5 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
20.4%
↓ 17% · MN 24.5This facility: 20.4, 17% below the MN average of 24.5 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
↓ 100% · MN 2.6This facility: 0.0, 100% below the MN average of 2.6 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
↓ 100% · MN 2.6This facility: 0.0, 100% below the MN average of 2.6 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.7%
↓ 7% · MN 4.0This facility: 3.7, 7% below the MN average of 4.0 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.7%
↓ 7% · MN 4.0This facility: 3.7, 7% below the MN average of 4.0 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.1%
↓ 39% · MN 5.2This facility: 3.1, 39% below the MN average of 5.2 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.1%
↓ 39% · MN 5.2This facility: 3.1, 39% below the MN average of 5.2 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.4%
↑ 57% · MN 4.1This facility: 6.4, 57% above the MN average of 4.1 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.4%
↑ 57% · MN 4.1This facility: 6.4, 57% above the MN average of 4.1 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · MN 4.1This facility: 0.0, 100% below the MN average of 4.1 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · MN 4.1This facility: 0.0, 100% below the MN average of 4.1 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
34.8%
↑ 104% · MN 17.1This facility: 34.8, 104% above the MN average of 17.1 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
34.8%
↑ 104% · MN 17.1This facility: 34.8, 104% above the MN average of 17.1 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
95.2%
↓ 2% · MN 97.4This facility: 95.2, 2% below the MN average of 97.4 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
95.2%
↓ 2% · MN 97.4This facility: 95.2, 2% below the MN average of 97.4 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
93.6%
↓ 3% · MN 96.1This facility: 93.6, 3% below the MN average of 96.1 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
93.6%
↓ 3% · MN 96.1This facility: 93.6, 3% below the MN average of 96.1 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.37
↓ 18% · MN 1.67This facility: 1.37, 18% below the MN average of 1.67 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.37
↓ 18% · MN 1.67This facility: 1.37, 18% below the MN average of 1.67 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.67
↓ 66% · MN 1.99This facility: 0.67, 66% below the MN average of 1.99 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.67
↓ 66% · MN 1.99This facility: 0.67, 66% below the MN average of 1.99 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
69.9%
↑ 30% · US 53.7This facility: 69.9, 30% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
69.9%
↑ 30% · US 53.7This facility: 69.9, 30% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
46.5%
↓ 8% · US 50.6This facility: 46.5, 8% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
46.5%
↓ 8% · US 50.6This facility: 46.5, 8% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
3.2%
↑ 310% · US 0.8This facility: 3.2, 310% above the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
3.2%
↑ 310% · US 0.8This facility: 3.2, 310% above the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.1%
↑ 69% · MN 1.9This facility: 3.1, 69% above the MN average of 1.9 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.1%
↑ 69% · MN 1.9This facility: 3.1, 69% above the MN average of 1.9 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
64.1%
↓ 27% · MN 88.1This facility: 64.1, 27% below the MN average of 88.1 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
64.1%
↓ 27% · MN 88.1This facility: 64.1, 27% below the MN average of 88.1 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
71.9%
↓ 13% · MN 82.7This facility: 71.9, 13% below the MN average of 82.7 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
71.9%
↓ 13% · MN 82.7This facility: 71.9, 13% below the MN average of 82.7 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
23.9%
↑ 3% · MN 23.1This facility: 23.9, 3% above the MN average of 23.1 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
23.9%
↑ 3% · MN 23.1This facility: 23.9, 3% above the MN average of 23.1 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
6.0%
↓ 57% · MN 14.0This facility: 6.0, 57% below the MN average of 14.0 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
6.0%
↓ 57% · MN 14.0This facility: 6.0, 57% below the MN average of 14.0 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Friendship Village of Bloomington’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 62 Minnesota nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−38.1% operating margin
+7.9 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 8 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($9.3M) trims the net loss to −$4.2M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Minnesota homes
48.8% payroll share of revenue
MN average 72.0%Rank #55 / 62Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 55th out of 62 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Minnesota average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $1.4M while revenue rose $5.7M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Minnesota homes.
Revenue & profit
Big revenue, persistent losses
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | MN median | Compared with MN homesRank in MN | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $35.5M | +$5.7M | Trend 20172024 | MN median $11.1M | Rank in MN Rank #2 / 62Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 2nd out of 62 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Minnesota average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 98% of homes | Top 2% in MN Higher net patient revenue than 98% of MN homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $49.0M | +$5.6M | Trend 20172024 | MN median — | Rank in MN Not ranked | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$13.5M | +$0.2M | Trend 20172024 | MN median — | Rank in MN Not ranked | Loss, narrowing Resident care lost money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −38.1% | +7.9 pts | Trend 20172024 | MN median — | Rank in MN Not ranked | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $9.3M | — | Trend — | MN median — | Rank in MN Not ranked | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$4.2M | +$13.6M | Trend — | MN median — | Rank in MN Not ranked | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Minnesota homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | MN median | Compared with MN homesRank in MN | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $17.3M | +$1.4M | Trend 20172024 | MN median $7.5M | Rank in MN Rank #4 / 62Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 4th out of 62 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Minnesota average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 95% of homes | Top 5% in MN by size Higher payroll than 95% of MN homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 48.8% | −4.5 pts | Trend 20172024 | MN median 58.1% | Rank in MN Rank #55 / 62Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 55th out of 62 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Minnesota average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 11% of homes | 23.2 pts under MN average The MN average is 72.0% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · MN benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Minnesota payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin MN payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $6.0M | $6.1M | $6.1M | $20.9M | $20.8M | $26.3M | $29.8M | $35.5M |
| Operating expenses | $24.2M | $25.6M | $25.8M | $25.5M | $35.2M | $39.6M | $43.5M | $49.0M |
| Net patient income | −$18.2M | −$19.5M | −$19.7M | −$4.6M | −$14.4M | −$13.3M | −$13.7M | −$13.5M |
| Operating margin | −301.3% | −319.2% | −321.9% | −22.1% | −69.0% | −50.6% | −46.0% | −38.1% |
| Net income | $3.0M | −$2.8M | $6.0M | $4.6M | −$3.4M | −$11.7M | −$17.9M | −$4.2M |
| Payroll costs | $10.1M | $10.5M | $10.8M | $10.5M | $11.4M | $14.5M | $15.9M | $17.3M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 167.8% | 171.3% | 176.9% | 50.5% | 54.6% | 55.1% | 53.3% | 48.8% |
| Beds | 119 | 119 | 119 | 66 | 66 | 66 | 66 | 66 |
| Gross revenue | $9.0M | $9.4M | $9.4M | $25.2M | $25.4M | $32.3M | $38.0M | $43.7M |
| Salaries | $8.5M | $8.7M | $9.2M | $8.9M | $9.6M | $12.6M | $14.0M | $15.4M |
| Wage-related costs | $1.6M | $1.7M | $1.6M | $1.7M | $1.7M | $1.9M | $1.9M | $2.0M |
| Contract labor | $1.0M | $0.9M | $0.9M | $0.8M | $1.4M | $1.3M | $0.6M | $1.0M |
| Other operating costs | $14.1M | $15.2M | $15.0M | $14.9M | $23.8M | $25.1M | $27.6M | $31.7M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $157 | $159 | $162 | $1,049 | $1,083 | $1,218 | $1,295 | $1,539 |
| Cost per day | $630 | $667 | $684 | $1,280 | $1,831 | $1,834 | $1,892 | $2,125 |
| Average length of stay | 56.6 days | 63.1 days | 110.8 days | 45.2 days | 51.8 days | 99.6 days | 80.4 days | 81.8 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Arriving
275 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
104 · 38%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
171 · 62%
Leaving
282 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
80 · 28%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
202 · 72%
Primarily short stays
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Places of interest near Friendship Village of Bloomington
4.7 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Bloomington's city center to Friendship Village of Bloomington's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 8.07 miles to nearest hospital (St. Francis Regional Medical Center)
Calculate Travel Distance to Friendship Village of Bloomington
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Bloomington
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the MN Dept. of Health, senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
CCRC (Continuing Care Retirement Community):
A campus with multiple care levels so residents can age in place without moving.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Minnesota average is: 72.0% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Presbyterian Homes of Bloomington | NH AL IL MC SNF | Bloomington (West Bloomington) | 111
Facility
111
MN AVG
88
Rank
#26 / 94 |
81.1%
Facility
81.1%
MN AVG
78.4%
Rank
#32 / 61 | +3% | 5.40
Facility
5.40
MN AVG
4.84
Rank
#16 / 63 | +16% | +12% | $0
Facility
$0
MN AVG
$55.1k
Rank
#1 / 66 | 8
Facility
8
MN AVG
23.4
Rank
#9 / 66 | 2.0
Facility
2.0
MN AVG
3.9
Rank
#6 / 66 | - | 90 | - |
37
Facility
37
MN AVG
49
Rank
#70 / 104 | Michelle Sullivan | $17.8MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$17.8MFiscal year ending 09/2024
MN AVG
$12.9M
Rank
#13 / 62 | $15.4MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$15.4MFiscal year ending 09/2024
MN AVG
$8.4M
Rank
#6 / 62 | 86.8%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
86.8%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
MN AVG
72%
Rank
#8 / 62 | 245556 | ||||
| Asst Lvg In Heritage Hall | NH AL IL MC SNF | Bloomington (West Bloomington) | 52
Facility
52
MN AVG
88
Rank
#59 / 94 | - | - | 5.24
Facility
5.24
MN AVG
4.84
Rank
#16 / 63 | +33% | +8% | $0
Facility
$0
MN AVG
$55.1k
Rank
#1 / 66 | 18
Facility
18
MN AVG
23.4
Rank
#21 / 66 | 6.0
Facility
6.0
MN AVG
3.9
Rank
#54 / 66 | - | 162 | - |
50
Facility
50
MN AVG
49
Rank
#54 / 104 | Mn Masonic Elder Services | $29.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$29.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MN AVG
$12.9M
Rank
#3 / 62 | $24.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$24.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MN AVG
$8.4M
Rank
#1 / 62 | 83.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
83.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MN AVG
72%
Rank
#9 / 62 | 245343 | ||||
| Friendship Village of Bloomington | NH AL CCRC IL MC SNF | Bloomington (West Bloomington) | 85
Facility
85
MN AVG
88
Rank
#38 / 94 |
84.7%
Facility
84.7%
MN AVG
78.4%
Rank
#26 / 61 | +8% | 4.77
Facility
4.77
MN AVG
4.84
Rank
#42 / 63 | +2% | -1% | $99.5k
Facility
$99.5k
MN AVG
$55.1k
Rank
#57 / 66 | 23
Facility
23
MN AVG
23.4
Rank
#27 / 66 | 7.7
Facility
7.7
MN AVG
3.9
Rank
#61 / 66 | 1 | 72 | - |
16
Facility
16
MN AVG
49
Rank
#92 / 104 | Jennifer Bever | $35.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$35.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MN AVG
$12.9M
Rank
#2 / 62 | $17.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$17.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MN AVG
$8.4M
Rank
#4 / 62 | 48.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
48.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MN AVG
72%
Rank
#55 / 62 | 245229 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other MN nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 3 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Minnesota
Friendship Village of Bloomington is located in Bloomington, Minnesota.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Minnesota.
Frequently Asked Questions about Friendship Village of Bloomington
What neighborhood is Friendship Village of Bloomington in?
Friendship Village of Bloomington is in the West Bloomington neighborhood of Bloomington.
Is Friendship Village of Bloomington in a walkable area?
Friendship Village of Bloomington has a walk score of 16. Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
What is the occupancy rate at Friendship Village of Bloomington?
Friendship Village of Bloomington's occupancy is 84.7%.
How long has Friendship Village of Bloomington been in business?
Friendship Village of Bloomington has been operating for approximately 47 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
Are pets allowed at Friendship Village of Bloomington?
Yes, Friendship Village of Bloomington allows residents to bring their pets.
Does Friendship Village of Bloomington operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Friendship Village of Bloomington is registered as a non-profit in MN.
What is the overall rating for Friendship Village of Bloomington?
Friendship Village of Bloomington received a 5-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Updated on
