Lomond Peak Nursing and Rehabilitation
Located in Ogden, Utah, Lomond Peak Nursing and Rehabilitation is a privately owned skilled nursing community, providing 24-hour skilled nursing care, short-term rehabilitation, and respite care. This 86-bed community holds a CMS 3-star overall rating and currently serves 85 residents, all under Medicaid coverage.
The community also stands out in its resident health outcomes, which are among the strongest in Utah. The high-risk clinical events composite score is 84% better than the Utah average, and its functional decline score is 71% better than the state mean, which reflects that long-stay residents are significantly less likely to experience falls with major injury, walking ability decline, daily activity dependence increase, unintended weight loss, urinary tract infections, and bowel or bladder incontinence. Both influenza and pneumococcal vaccine rates for long-stay residents are also each 100%. These outcomes carry a CMS 5-star quality measures rating, which is significantly above average, and represent a meaningful differentiator for families prioritizing safety and functional preservation.
Since 2025, only one deficiency has been recorded across two inspections, which is 93% fewer than the Utah average. The single deficiency, identified during an unannounced routine inspection on October 9, 2025, related to dietary compliance: specifically, the community was cited for not fully meeting the requirement to provide each resident with a safe, palatable, and nutritionally balanced diet. This finding has been noted as corrected. However, no fines, enforcement actions, complaint investigations, or immediate jeopardy findings appear in the available inspection record. The broader CMS health inspection history also shows 21 total citations across three inspections over four years, which is below the Utah average, with zero critical citations and only one serious citation.
On staffing, total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day come in at 2 hours 21 minutes, ranking 56th out of 58 Utah skilled nursing communities. While RN hours are 65% below the Utah average, the community maintains 41 CNAs working 100% of days, and 10 LPNs are also present every day to provide consistent hands-on daily care. The clinical team is als consist of a nurse practitioner, RN Director of Nursing, two clinical nurse specialists, and a contracted dietitian. An active Resident Council also meets regularly, offering older adults a structured voice in community policies and quality of life decisions. No federal civil money penalties have been assessed in the past three years.
Additionally, its location at the city center earns it a Walk Score of 86, the highest among all Utah skilled nursing communities in the statewide benchmark, giving residents, families, and staff convenient access to surrounding amenities, healthcare providers, and services on foot.
Lomond Peak Nursing and Rehabilitation is best suited for long-term Medicaid older adults and their families seeking an Ogden-based skilled nursing community with an exceptional track record on safety outcomes, a clean regulatory history, and a prime walkable location in Weber County. However, families are encouraged to discuss current dietary service improvements with the care team during a visit and may want to ask about RN coverage levels relative to the specific clinical needs.
Capacity and availability
About this community
Occupancy
Inspection History
In Utah, the Department of Health and Human Services, Health Facility Licensing conducts regular onsite inspections to ensure compliance with state and federal healthcare standards.
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Utah state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Since 2025 vs. Utah state average• Total deficiencies (93% below)
• Deficiencies per inspection (89% below)
• Inspections with deficiencies (50% below)
• Inspection deficiency rate (25% below)
Deficiencies
| This Facility | UT Average | vs. UT Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
| 1 | 14 | This facility has 93% fewer total deficiencies than a typical Utah nursing home (1 vs. UT avg 14).↓ 93% better |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
| 0.5 | 4.7 | This facility has 89% fewer deficiencies per inspection than a typical Utah nursing home (0.5 vs. UT avg 4.7).↓ 89% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | UT Average | vs. UT Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
| 2 | 3 | This facility has had 33% fewer total inspections than the Utah average (2 vs. UT avg 3). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 33% fewer |
|
Inspections with deficiencies
| 1 | 2 | This facility has 50% fewer inspections with deficiencies than a typical Utah nursing home (1 vs. UT avg 2).↓ 50% better |
|
Inspection deficiency rate
| 50% | 67% | This facility has 17 percentage points lower inspection deficiency rate than a typical Utah nursing home (50% vs. UT avg 67%).↓ 17% better |
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials were reported in the last 3 years.
Places of interest near Lomond Peak Nursing and Rehabilitation
0.0 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Ogden's city center to Lomond Peak Nursing and Rehabilitation's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Lomond Peak Nursing and Rehabilitation
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Ogden
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the UT Dept. of Health & Human Services (DHHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest to lowest based on our ranking methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Utah average is: 49.5% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Terrace at Mt. Ogden | NH MC SNF | Ogden (South Weber) | 120
Facility
120
UT AVG
81
Rank
#31 / 189 |
71.7%
Facility
71.7%
UT AVG
71.7
Rank
#38 / 66 | 0% | 3.53
Facility
3.53
UT AVG
3.72
Rank
#29 / 69 | -35% | -5% | $0
Facility
$0
UT AVG
$52.4k
Rank
#1 / 75 | 27
Facility
27
UT AVG
27.7
Rank
#43 / 70 | 5.4
Facility
5.4
UT AVG
7.6
Rank
#24 / 70 | - | 86 | - |
41
Facility
41
UT AVG
49
Rank
#167 / 266 | Waterfall Canyon Healthcare, Inc | $10.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$10.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
UT AVG
$9.3M
Rank
#26 / 71 | $5.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$5.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
UT AVG
$4.5M
Rank
#22 / 71 | 55.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
55.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
UT AVG
49.5%
Rank
#18 / 69 | 465115 | ||||
| Crestwood Rehabilitation and Nursing | NH | Ogden | 88
Facility
88
UT AVG
81
Rank
#77 / 189 |
95.2%
Facility
95.2%
UT AVG
71.7
Rank
#7 / 66 | +33% | 2.80
Facility
2.80
UT AVG
3.72
Rank
#65 / 69 | -26% | -25% | $20.0k
Facility
$20.0k
UT AVG
$52.4k
Rank
#48 / 75 | 51
Facility
51
UT AVG
27.7
Rank
#60 / 70 | 8.5
Facility
8.5
UT AVG
7.6
Rank
#50 / 70 | 2 | 84 | - |
72
Facility
72
UT AVG
49
Rank
#45 / 266 | Crestwood Rehabilitation And Nursing LLC | $6.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$6.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
UT AVG
$9.3M
Rank
#44 / 71 | $2.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$2.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
UT AVG
$4.5M
Rank
#52 / 71 | 41.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
41.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
UT AVG
49.5%
Rank
#50 / 69 | 465083 | ||||
| South Ogden Post Acute | NH HOS RC SNF | East Ogden | 122
Facility
122
UT AVG
81
Rank
#29 / 189 |
68.5%
Facility
68.5%
UT AVG
71.7
Rank
#41 / 66 | -4% | 3.48
Facility
3.48
UT AVG
3.72
Rank
#29 / 69 | +21% | -7% | $68.9k
Facility
$68.9k
UT AVG
$52.4k
Rank
#65 / 75 | 97
Facility
97
UT AVG
27.7
Rank
#69 / 70 | 13.9
Facility
13.9
UT AVG
7.6
Rank
#62 / 70 | 25 | 84 | - |
13
Facility
13
UT AVG
49
Rank
#242 / 266 | Cascades At South Ogden Rehab LLC | $11.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$11.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
UT AVG
$9.3M
Rank
#23 / 71 | $4.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$4.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
UT AVG
$4.5M
Rank
#32 / 71 | 38.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
38.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
UT AVG
49.5%
Rank
#54 / 69 | 465117 | ||||
| Lomond Peak Nursing and Rehabilitation | NH HOS RC SNF | North Ogden | 86
Facility
86
UT AVG
81
Rank
#79 / 189 |
98.8%
Facility
98.8%
UT AVG
71.7
Rank
#4 / 66 | +38% | 2.38
Facility
2.38
UT AVG
3.72
Rank
#67 / 69 | - | -36% | $0
Facility
$0
UT AVG
$52.4k
Rank
#1 / 75 | - | - | - | 85 | - |
86
Facility
86
UT AVG
49
Rank
#9 / 266 | - | - | - | - | 46A071 |
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Utah
Lomond Peak Nursing and Rehabilitation is located in North Ogden, Utah.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Utah.
Frequently Asked Questions about Lomond Peak Nursing and Rehabilitation
Is Lomond Peak Nursing and Rehabilitation in a walkable area?
Lomond Peak Nursing and Rehabilitation has a walk score of 86. Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
When does Lomond Peak Nursing and Rehabilitation's license expire?
According to UT state health department records, Lomond Peak Nursing and Rehabilitation's license expires on November 30, 2026.
What is the occupancy rate at Lomond Peak Nursing and Rehabilitation?
Lomond Peak Nursing and Rehabilitation's occupancy is 99%.
How long has Lomond Peak Nursing and Rehabilitation been in business?
Lomond Peak Nursing and Rehabilitation has been operating for approximately 25 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
Are pets allowed at Lomond Peak Nursing and Rehabilitation?
No, Lomond Peak Nursing and Rehabilitation has a no-pet policy.
Does Lomond Peak Nursing and Rehabilitation operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Lomond Peak Nursing and Rehabilitation is registered as a for-profit in UT.
How many beds does Lomond Peak Nursing and Rehabilitation have?
Lomond Peak Nursing and Rehabilitation has 86 beds.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance





