Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
153
149 employees · 4 contractors · 56 on an average day Maple Grove Health & Rehabilitation Center
Nursing Home, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Greensboro, NC
ALM Inspection Grade
C+
ALM's inspection grade is 78 / 100, a C+ — 4 points below the North Carolina average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 78 / 100, a C+ — 4 points below the North Carolina average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Maple Grove Health & Rehabilitation Center
Nursing Home, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Greensboro, NC
ALM Inspection Grade
C+
ALM's inspection grade is 78 / 100, a C+ — 4 points below the North Carolina average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 78 / 100, a C+ — 4 points below the North Carolina average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Maple Grove Health & Rehabilitation Center accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Maple Grove Health & Rehabilitation Center provides nursing home, memory care, and skilled nursing in Greensboro, NC. Skilled nursing means licensed nursing care is available on site around the clock, while nursing home services include both long term care and short term rehabilitation for residents recovering from an illness or rebuilding daily abilities.
Memory care offers a supervised setting for individuals with dementia. The community suits someone who needs dementia focused support or whose needs may move between rehabilitation, long term care, and memory care. With 210 beds, the community has a larger resident population. Total nurse staffing is 4 hours and 3 minutes per resident per day, representing the daily hands on nursing time available to each resident.
Payment options are Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay. Medicare applies to short term skilled care after a hospital stay, Medicaid can help cover a long stay when savings are limited, and private pay means the family funds care directly. A Walk Score of 51 places the area in the somewhat walkable range, so a resident can complete some errands on foot but may need a car or ride for others.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 48th out of 80 nursing homes we track in North Carolina for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 3m
This nursing home is ranked 48th out of 80 nursing homes we track in North Carolina for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 3mStandout metric: RN, weekends is +72% above North Carolina average
2 of 6 metrics below North Carolina average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 13 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
13 staff · 9.5-hour shifts
52m
↑ 48% · NC 35mThis facility: 52m per resident per day, 48% above the North Carolina average of 35m (among North Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 13 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
13 staff · 9.5-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 10 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
10 staff · 9.4-hour shifts
36m
↓ 31% · NC 52mThis facility: 36m per resident per day, 31% below the North Carolina average of 52m (among North Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 10 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
10 staff · 9.4-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 87 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
87 staff · 8-hour shifts
2h 35m
↑ 11% · NC 2h 19mThis facility: 2h 35m per resident per day, 11% above the North Carolina average of 2h 19m (among North Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 87 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
87 staff · 8-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 21m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
4m
↓ 13% · NC 5mThis facility: 4m per resident per day, 13% below the North Carolina average of 5m (among North Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
3h 39m
↑ 9% · NC 3h 20mThis facility: 3h 39m per resident per day, 9% above the North Carolina average of 3h 20m (among North Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
40m
↑ 72% · NC 23mThis facility: 40m per resident per day, 72% above the North Carolina average of 23m (among North Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
153
149 employees · 4 contractors · 56 on an average day
153 total staff / 98 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.56 : 1
↓ 11% · NC 1.76This facility: 1.56 staff per resident, 11% below the North Carolina average of 1.76 (among North Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
153 staff ÷ 98 residents
See full North Carolina ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8.2 h
↑ 2% · NC 8 hThis facility: 8.2 h, 2% above the North Carolina average of 8 h (among North Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
42,266 staff hours this quarter
See full North Carolina ranking →99.4% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
North Carolina average: 86.6% · Contractors this quarter: Occupational Therapy Assistant (3), Qualified Social Worker (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A large-scale community that may provide a wide range of amenities, services, and structured programs.
210
Rank #2 / 82Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 2nd out of 82 nursing homes we track in North Carolina for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other North Carolina facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in North Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A large-scale community that may provide a wide range of amenities, services, and structured programs.
210
Rank #2 / 82Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 2nd out of 82 nursing homes we track in North Carolina for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other North Carolina facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in North Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.High-capacity home · May provide extensive amenities, services and programs.
Walk Score
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #23 / 111Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 23rd out of 111 nursing homes we track in North Carolina for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across North Carolina facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in North Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #23 / 111Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 23rd out of 111 nursing homes we track in North Carolina for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across North Carolina facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in North Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
51
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #68 / 72Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 68th out of 72 nursing homes we track in North Carolina for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the North Carolina average, with its Statewide rank out of 72. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in North Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #68 / 72Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 68th out of 72 nursing homes we track in North Carolina for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the North Carolina average, with its Statewide rank out of 72. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in North Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
52.9%
This home usually has availability
Based on residents per day and 210 beds.
Lower than the North Carolina average: 82.6%
Residents per day (avg)
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
111
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
248
days
About This Community
Resident Council
Occupational Therapy
Physical Therapy
Speech Therapy
Pets not allowed
Building TypeSingle-story
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
78 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
4 points below the North Carolina average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Typical
39 severity-weighted points (23 deficiencies) · 30% higher than the typical CMS-certified NC facility (median: 30)
Enforcement
Concern
$50,310 in fines · 1 enforcement action
Persistence
Concern
34 days to fix issues · slower than the typical CMS-certified NC facility (median: 24)
Total health inspections
4
↑ 3% · NC 3.9This facility: 4, 3% above the North Carolina average of 3.9 (among North Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
23
Rank #65 / 82Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 65th out of 82 nursing homes we track in North Carolina for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the North Carolina State average, with a ranking across all 82 NC facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in North Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 21% · NC 19This facility: 23, 21% above the North Carolina average of 19 (among North Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
5.75
Rank #66 / 82Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 66th out of 82 nursing homes we track in North Carolina for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the North Carolina mean across 82 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in North Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 24% · NC 4.64This facility: 5.75, 24% above the North Carolina average of 4.64 (among North Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
23 of 23 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · NC 1This facility: 0, 100% below the North Carolina average of 1 (among North Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
1
↑ 25% · NC 0.8This facility: 1, 25% above the North Carolina average of 0.8 (among North Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
19
↑ 21% · NC 15.7This facility: 19, 21% above the North Carolina average of 15.7 (among North Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
3
↑ 114% · NC 1.4This facility: 3, 114% above the North Carolina average of 1.4 (among North Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Nov 19, 2025 · 2 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 5 of 23 citations · 9 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Nov 19, 2025
2 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 06, 2024
5 citations
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Sep 01, 2023
2 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 27, 2023
14 citations
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 23 citations
Quality of Life & Care
5 deficiencies (22%)
Resident Rights
4 deficiencies (17%)
Administration
3 deficiencies (13%)
Infection Control
2 deficiencies (9%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
2 deficiencies (9%)
Nutrition & Dietary
2 deficiencies (9%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
2 deficiencies (9%)
Pharmacy Services
2 deficiencies (9%)
Nursing & Physician Services
1 deficiency (4%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
17 of 23 citations resulted from standard inspections; 4 of 23 resulted from complaint investigations; and 2 of 23 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
1 penalty in the past 3 years
Latest: Mar 6, 2024 · $50,310 civil money penalty
Mar 6, 2024 · $50,310 civil money penalty
Total fines
$50,310
↓ 22% · NC $65KThis facility: $50,310, 22% below the North Carolina average of $64,632. Average among the 235 North Carolina facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #69 / 86Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 69th out of 86 nursing homes we track in North Carolina for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the North Carolina average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 86 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in North Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
1
↓ 52% · NC 2.09This facility: 1, 52% below the North Carolina average of 2.09. Average among the 235 North Carolina facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
NC avg 0.32North Carolina average: 0.32. Average among the 235 North Carolina facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Mar 6, 2024
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$50,310
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$50,310Fine amount comparison
This facility
$50,310
North Carolina average
$64,632
US average
$67,417
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. North Carolina and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the North Carolina average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 72% · NC 2.9This facility: 5.0, 72% above the NC average of 2.9 (among NC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
6.4
Score · lower is better
↓ 35% · NC 9.9This facility: 6.4, 35% below the NC average of 9.9 (among NC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
10.9
Score · lower is better
↓ 40% · NC 18.2This facility: 10.9, 40% below the NC average of 18.2 (among NC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 10 better, 2 worse, 1 near NC average
3 short-stay measures: 1 better, 2 worse
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
8.5%
↓ 46% · NC 15.6This facility: 8.5, 46% below the NC average of 15.6 (among NC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
8.5%
↓ 46% · NC 15.6This facility: 8.5, 46% below the NC average of 15.6 (among NC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
15.2%
↓ 17% · NC 18.3This facility: 15.2, 17% below the NC average of 18.3 (among NC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
15.2%
↓ 17% · NC 18.3This facility: 15.2, 17% below the NC average of 18.3 (among NC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
9.0%
↓ 57% · NC 20.7This facility: 9.0, 57% below the NC average of 20.7 (among NC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
9.0%
↓ 57% · NC 20.7This facility: 9.0, 57% below the NC average of 20.7 (among NC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.8%
↓ 65% · NC 2.3This facility: 0.8, 65% below the NC average of 2.3 (among NC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.8%
↓ 65% · NC 2.3This facility: 0.8, 65% below the NC average of 2.3 (among NC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.7%
↓ 24% · NC 3.5This facility: 2.7, 24% below the NC average of 3.5 (among NC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.7%
↓ 24% · NC 3.5This facility: 2.7, 24% below the NC average of 3.5 (among NC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.3%
↓ 58% · NC 5.5This facility: 2.3, 58% below the NC average of 5.5 (among NC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.3%
↓ 58% · NC 5.5This facility: 2.3, 58% below the NC average of 5.5 (among NC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.5%
↓ 51% · NC 7.2This facility: 3.5, 51% below the NC average of 7.2 (among NC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.5%
↓ 51% · NC 7.2This facility: 3.5, 51% below the NC average of 7.2 (among NC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.3%
↓ 95% · NC 5.9This facility: 0.3, 95% below the NC average of 5.9 (among NC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.3%
↓ 95% · NC 5.9This facility: 0.3, 95% below the NC average of 5.9 (among NC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21.9%
↑ 56% · NC 14.0This facility: 21.9, 56% above the NC average of 14.0 (among NC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21.9%
↑ 56% · NC 14.0This facility: 21.9, 56% above the NC average of 14.0 (among NC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
68.5%
↓ 26% · NC 92.0This facility: 68.5, 26% below the NC average of 92.0 (among NC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
68.5%
↓ 26% · NC 92.0This facility: 68.5, 26% below the NC average of 92.0 (among NC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.8%
↑ 4% · NC 94.1This facility: 97.8, 4% above the NC average of 94.1 (among NC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.8%
↑ 4% · NC 94.1This facility: 97.8, 4% above the NC average of 94.1 (among NC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.86
↓ 51% · NC 1.77This facility: 0.86, 51% below the NC average of 1.77 (among NC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.86
↓ 51% · NC 1.77This facility: 0.86, 51% below the NC average of 1.77 (among NC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.20
↓ 34% · NC 1.82This facility: 1.20, 34% below the NC average of 1.82 (among NC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.20
↓ 34% · NC 1.82This facility: 1.20, 34% below the NC average of 1.82 (among NC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 3 measures
Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.0%
↓ 29% · NC 1.4This facility: 1.0, 29% below the NC average of 1.4 (among NC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.0%
↓ 29% · NC 1.4This facility: 1.0, 29% below the NC average of 1.4 (among NC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
32.4%
↓ 60% · NC 80.6This facility: 32.4, 60% below the NC average of 80.6 (among NC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
32.4%
↓ 60% · NC 80.6This facility: 32.4, 60% below the NC average of 80.6 (among NC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
58.8%
↓ 25% · NC 78.1This facility: 58.8, 25% below the NC average of 78.1 (among NC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
58.8%
↓ 25% · NC 78.1This facility: 58.8, 25% below the NC average of 78.1 (among NC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Maple Grove Health & Rehabilitation Center’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending September 2024, compared with 79 North Carolina nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Sep 2024
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−16.1% operating margin
+7.6 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 8 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($0.3M) trims the net loss to −$1.8M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most North Carolina homes
49.4% payroll share of revenue
NC average 61.1%Rank #36 / 79Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 36th out of 79 nursing homes we track in North Carolina for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the North Carolina average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in North Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $1.5M while revenue rose $1.5M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with North Carolina homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | NC median | Compared with NC homesRank in NC | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $13.1M | +$1.5M | Trend 20172024 | NC median $13.4M | Rank in NC Rank #44 / 79Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 44th out of 79 nursing homes we track in North Carolina for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the North Carolina average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in North Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 45% of homes | Below NC median Higher net patient revenue than 45% of NC homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $15.2M | +$0.9M | Trend 20172024 | NC median $14.7M | Rank in NC Rank #38 / 79Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 38th out of 79 nursing homes we track in North Carolina for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other North Carolina homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in North Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 53% of homes | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$2.1M | +$0.6M | Trend 20172024 | NC median $0.1M | Rank in NC Rank #61 / 79Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 61st out of 79 nursing homes we track in North Carolina for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other North Carolina homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in North Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 23% of homes | Loss, narrowing Resident care lost money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −16.1% | +7.6 pts | Trend 20172024 | NC median 0.5% | Rank in NC Rank #63 / 79Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 63rd out of 79 nursing homes we track in North Carolina for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other North Carolina homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in North Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 21% of homes | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.3M | — | Trend — | NC median $0.2M | Rank in NC Rank #32 / 75Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 32nd out of 75 nursing homes we track in North Carolina for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other North Carolina homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in North Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 58% of homes | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$1.8M | +$0.7M | Trend — | NC median $0.8M | Rank in NC Rank #71 / 79Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 71st out of 79 nursing homes we track in North Carolina for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other North Carolina homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in North Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 10% of homes | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most North Carolina homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | NC median | Compared with NC homesRank in NC | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $6.5M | +$1.5M | Trend 20172024 | NC median $7.0M | Rank in NC Rank #47 / 79Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 47th out of 79 nursing homes we track in North Carolina for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the North Carolina average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in North Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 41% of homes | Below NC median Higher payroll than 41% of NC homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 49.4% | +6.6 pts | Trend 20172024 | NC median 49.1% | Rank in NC Rank #36 / 79Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 36th out of 79 nursing homes we track in North Carolina for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the North Carolina average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in North Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 55% of homes | 11.7 pts under NC average The NC average is 61.1% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · NC benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the North Carolina payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin NC payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $9.1M | $8.4M | $9.1M | $13.0M | $12.7M | $11.0M | $11.6M | $13.1M |
| Operating expenses | $10.6M | $9.6M | $10.2M | $14.1M | $16.6M | $13.3M | $14.3M | $15.2M |
| Net patient income | −$1.5M | −$1.2M | −$1.1M | −$1.1M | −$3.9M | −$2.3M | −$2.7M | −$2.1M |
| Operating margin | −16.1% | −14.8% | −12.4% | −8.4% | −30.6% | −21.4% | −23.7% | −16.1% |
| Net income | −$1.0M | −$0.8M | −$0.9M | −$0.9M | −$2.6M | −$1.4M | −$2.5M | −$1.8M |
| Payroll costs | $4.0M | $3.7M | $4.3M | $4.9M | $5.6M | $4.3M | $5.0M | $6.5M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 43.5% | 44.5% | 47.7% | 37.7% | 44.5% | 39.5% | 42.8% | 49.4% |
| Beds | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 |
| Gross revenue | $12.9M | $12.1M | $12.5M | $12.4M | $12.2M | $10.4M | $11.7M | $12.6M |
| Salaries | $3.2M | $3.1M | $3.6M | $4.2M | $4.7M | $3.6M | $4.2M | $5.4M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.7M | $0.6M | $0.7M | $0.8M | $0.9M | $0.7M | $0.7M | $1.0M |
| Contract labor | $1.1M | $1.0M | $1.3M | $3.1M | $3.9M | $3.0M | $3.3M | $2.4M |
| Other operating costs | $6.6M | $5.9M | $5.9M | $9.2M | $10.9M | $9.0M | $9.4M | $8.7M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $201 | $187 | $201 | $289 | $308 | $308 | $305 | $327 |
| Cost per day | $233 | $214 | $225 | $314 | $402 | $373 | $377 | $379 |
| Average length of stay | 155.3 days | 302.7 days | 192.4 days | 125.0 days | 116.2 days | 108.6 days | 231.1 days | 247.6 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Jun 2026
Arriving
139 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
7 · 5%
Medicaid
54 · 39%
Private pay & other
78 · 56%
Resident snapshot
98 residents · Jun 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
0 · 0%
Medicaid
93 · 95%
Private pay & other
5 · 5%
Leaving
159 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
1 · 1%
Medicaid
73 · 46%
Private pay & other
85 · 53%
Mostly long-term care residents
Most residents stay for extended periods and receive ongoing daily care.
Places of interest near Maple Grove Health & Rehabilitation Center
2.8 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Greensboro's city center to Maple Grove Health & Rehabilitation Center's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Maple Grove Health & Rehabilitation Center
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Greensboro
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the NC Dept. of Health & Human Services (NCDHHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The North Carolina average is: 61.1% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maple Grove Health & Rehabilitation Center | NH MC SNF | Greensboro | 210
Facility
210
NC AVG
94
Rank
#2 / 82 | C+ |
52.9%
Facility
52.9%
NC AVG
82.6%
Rank
#68 / 72 | -36% | 4.04
Facility
4.04
NC AVG
4.01
Rank
#48 / 80 | -7% | +1% | $50.3k
Facility
$50.3k
NC AVG
$66.6k
Rank
#69 / 86 | 23
Facility
23
NC AVG
19.0
Rank
#65 / 82 | 5.8
Facility
5.8
NC AVG
4.6
Rank
#66 / 82 | 1 | 111 | - |
51
Facility
51
NC AVG
33
Rank
#23 / 111 | - | $13.1MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$13.1MFiscal year ending 09/2024
NC AVG
$17.2M
Rank
#44 / 79 | $6.5MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$6.5MFiscal year ending 09/2024
NC AVG
$9.2M
Rank
#47 / 79 | 49.4%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
49.4%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
NC AVG
61.1%
Rank
#36 / 79 | 345448 | ||||
| Maryfield Nursing Home | NH MC PC | High Point | 115
Facility
115
NC AVG
94
Rank
#24 / 82 | A |
91.4%
Facility
91.4%
NC AVG
82.6%
Rank
#21 / 72 | +11% | 4.53
Facility
4.53
NC AVG
4.01
Rank
#29 / 80 | +3% | +13% | $0
Facility
$0
NC AVG
$66.6k
Rank
#1 / 86 | 2
Facility
2
NC AVG
19.0
Rank
#5 / 82 | 1.0
Facility
1.0
NC AVG
4.6
Rank
#1 / 82 | - | 105 | - |
31
Facility
31
NC AVG
33
Rank
#49 / 111 | Maryfield, Inc | $34.8MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$34.8MFiscal year ending 09/2024
NC AVG
$17.2M
Rank
#6 / 79 | $17.1MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$17.1MFiscal year ending 09/2024
NC AVG
$9.2M
Rank
#9 / 79 | 49%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
49%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
NC AVG
61.1%
Rank
#41 / 79 | 345093 | ||||
| Heartland Living and Rehabilitation | NH RC | Greensboro | 107
Facility
107
NC AVG
94
Rank
#30 / 82 | B+ |
86.1%
Facility
86.1%
NC AVG
82.6%
Rank
#36 / 72 | +4% | 4.07
Facility
4.07
NC AVG
4.01
Rank
#41 / 80 | -80% | +2% | $0
Facility
$0
NC AVG
$66.6k
Rank
#1 / 86 | 13
Facility
13
NC AVG
19.0
Rank
#40 / 82 | 4.3
Facility
4.3
NC AVG
4.6
Rank
#47 / 82 | - | 92 | - |
39
Facility
39
NC AVG
33
Rank
#40 / 111 | Horace Wilson | $12.1MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$12.1MFiscal year ending 09/2024
NC AVG
$17.2M
Rank
#54 / 79 | $6.1MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$6.1MFiscal year ending 09/2024
NC AVG
$9.2M
Rank
#53 / 79 | 50.3%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
50.3%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
NC AVG
61.1%
Rank
#29 / 79 | 345391 | ||||
| Kindred Hospital Greensboro | NH SNF | Greensboro | 23
Facility
23
NC AVG
94
Rank
#76 / 82 | B+ |
94.8%
Facility
94.8%
NC AVG
82.6%
Rank
#7 / 72 | +15% | 2.45
Facility
2.45
NC AVG
4.01
Rank
#80 / 80 | -36% | -39% | $0
Facility
$0
NC AVG
$66.6k
Rank
#1 / 86 | 14
Facility
14
NC AVG
19.0
Rank
#41 / 82 | 7.0
Facility
7.0
NC AVG
4.6
Rank
#72 / 82 | - | 22 | - |
23
Facility
23
NC AVG
33
Rank
#71 / 111 | - | - | - | - | 345273 | ||||
| Guilford Health Care Center | NH SNF | Greensboro | 110
Facility
110
NC AVG
94
Rank
#26 / 82 | C+ |
94.1%
Facility
94.1%
NC AVG
82.6%
Rank
#10 / 72 | +14% | 3.16
Facility
3.16
NC AVG
4.01
Rank
#75 / 80 | -21% | -21% | $0
Facility
$0
NC AVG
$66.6k
Rank
#1 / 86 | 27
Facility
27
NC AVG
19.0
Rank
#67 / 82 | 6.8
Facility
6.8
NC AVG
4.6
Rank
#70 / 82 | - | 104 | - |
33
Facility
33
NC AVG
33
Rank
#46 / 111 | Guilford Holdings Ill | $14.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$14.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NC AVG
$17.2M
Rank
#31 / 79 | $7.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NC AVG
$9.2M
Rank
#41 / 79 | 47.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
47.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
NC AVG
61.1%
Rank
#46 / 79 | 345460 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other NC nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in North Carolina
Maple Grove Health & Rehabilitation Center is located in Greensboro, North Carolina.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in North Carolina.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Maple Grove Health & Rehabilitation Center
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Is Maple Grove Health & Rehabilitation Center in a walkable area?
Maple Grove Health & Rehabilitation Center has a walk score of 51. Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
02 What is the occupancy rate at Maple Grove Health & Rehabilitation Center?
Maple Grove Health & Rehabilitation Center's occupancy is 52.9%.
03 Are pets allowed at Maple Grove Health & Rehabilitation Center?
No, Maple Grove Health & Rehabilitation Center has a no-pet policy.
04 What is the best email address for Maple Grove Health & Rehabilitation Center?
The team at Maple Grove Health & Rehabilitation Center can be reached at admissions@maplegrovecare.com.
05 Does Maple Grove Health & Rehabilitation Center operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Maple Grove Health & Rehabilitation Center is registered as a for-profit.
06 What is the overall rating for Maple Grove Health & Rehabilitation Center?
Maple Grove Health & Rehabilitation Center received a 5-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
07 How many beds does Maple Grove Health & Rehabilitation Center have?
Maple Grove Health & Rehabilitation Center has 210 beds.
Updated on
