Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
156
131 employees · 25 contractors · 45 on an average day Pine Village
Nursing Home, Adult Day Care, Assisted Living, Independent Living, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Moundridge, KS
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Community photos aren’t available yet.
To request photos, use the contact form below.
Pine Village
Nursing Home, Adult Day Care, Assisted Living, Independent Living, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Moundridge, KS
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Pine Village accepts Medicaid, Medicare, and private pay.
Overview of Pine Village
Pine Village offers adult day care, assisted living, independent living, memory care, nursing home care, and skilled nursing in Moundridge, Kansas. Independent living provides private living with community services and no daily care, while assisted living supports daily tasks such as dressing, bathing, and medication management. Memory care provides a secured setting with supervision, and nursing home and skilled nursing care provide licensed nursing care on site around the clock.
The range of care levels may suit a resident whose needs grow over time without requiring a move to another community. Pine Village has 74 beds. Eric Schrag serves as administrator, and Memorial Home operates the community.
Medicaid, Medicare, and private pay are accepted. Medicaid can help cover a long stay when personal savings may not be enough, while Medicare covers short-term skilled care after a hospital stay rather than long-term residence; private pay is another listed payment route. Rehabilitation services can support a resident who needs therapy as part of care, and Pine Village also has a Wellness Center.
A Walk Score of 43 places the area in a car-dependent setting, so most errands require a car or a ride. A resident who no longer drives would need transportation for most errands.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 16th out of 136 nursing homes we track in Kansas for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
6h 13m
This nursing home is ranked 16th out of 136 nursing homes we track in Kansas for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
6h 13mStandout metric: LPN / LVN is +89% above Kansas average
3 of 6 metrics below Kansas average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 7 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
7 staff · 7.2-hour shifts
28m
↓ 34% · KS 43mThis facility: 28m per resident per day, 34% below the Kansas average of 43m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 7 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
7 staff · 7.2-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 21 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
21 staff · 9.6-hour shifts
1h 16m
↑ 89% · KS 40mThis facility: 1h 16m per resident per day, 89% above the Kansas average of 40m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 21 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
21 staff · 9.6-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 59 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
59 staff · 8.2-hour shifts
4h 29m
↑ 67% · KS 2h 41mThis facility: 4h 29m per resident per day, 67% above the Kansas average of 2h 41m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 59 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
59 staff · 8.2-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 20m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 20m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
1m
↓ 46% · KS 2mThis facility: 1m per resident per day, 46% below the Kansas average of 2m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
5h 18m
↑ 48% · KS 3h 35mThis facility: 5h 18m per resident per day, 48% above the Kansas average of 3h 35m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
15m
↓ 50% · KS 30mThis facility: 15m per resident per day, 50% below the Kansas average of 30m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 28m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 28m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
156
131 employees · 25 contractors · 45 on an average day
156 total staff / 66 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
2.36 : 1
↑ 7% · KS 2.22This facility: 2.36 staff per resident, 7% above the Kansas average of 2.22 (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
156 staff ÷ 66 residents
See full Kansas ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8 h
↑ 4% · KS 7.7 hThis facility: 8 h, 4% above the Kansas average of 7.7 h (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
33,277 staff hours this quarter
See full Kansas ranking →97.6% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Kansas average: 91.7% · Contractors this quarter: Speech Language Pathologist (7), Respiratory Therapy Technician (5), Qualified Social Worker (4), Physical Therapy Aide (4), Physical Therapy Assistant (2), Medical Director (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1), Occupational Therapy Aide (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
74
Rank #57 / 151Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 57th out of 151 nursing homes we track in Kansas for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Kansas facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
74
Rank #57 / 151Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 57th out of 151 nursing homes we track in Kansas for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Kansas facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Walk Score
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #100 / 162Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 100th out of 162 nursing homes we track in Kansas for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Kansas facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #100 / 162Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 100th out of 162 nursing homes we track in Kansas for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Kansas facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
43
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #44 / 143Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 44th out of 143 nursing homes we track in Kansas for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Kansas average, with its Statewide rank out of 143. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #44 / 143Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 44th out of 143 nursing homes we track in Kansas for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Kansas average, with its Statewide rank out of 143. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
89.2%
This home usually has limited availability
Based on 66 residents and 74 beds. Source: state inspection report (May 2025)
Higher than the Kansas average: 80.7%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
274
days
About This Community
Facility TypeNursing Facility | Residential Health Care Facility
StatusActive
CountyMcpherson
License Number175414
CMS Certification Number175414
Pine Village is administered by Eric Schrag.
Owner NameMemorial Home Inc
Resident Council
Family Council
Accept Medicaid
Pets not allowed
Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC)
Minimum Age62
This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ. Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file — covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification surveys.
Inspection History
In Kansas, the Department for Aging and Disability Services, Survey and Certification Commission performs the unannounced inspections required for facility licensing and federal certification.
Since 2011 · 15 years of data
These figures come from state-published data and the state inspection reports we hold on file. The period covered can vary depending on document availability.
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 105 deficiencies 40 inspections
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 105 deficiencies 40 inspections
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Kansas state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Since 2011 vs. Kansas state average
Overall vs. KS average
1 Worse
Metrics worse than Kansas average:
• Total deficiencies (4% above) 1 Better Metrics better than Kansas average:
• Deficiencies per inspection (26% below)
• Total deficiencies (4% above) 1 Better Metrics better than Kansas average:
• Deficiencies per inspection (26% below)
Deficiencies
| This Facility | KS Average | vs. KS Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 105 | 101.0 | This facility has 4% more total deficiencies than a typical Kansas nursing home (105 vs. KS avg 101).↑ 4% worse |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
Average deficiencies per inspection.
| 2.6 | 3.5 | This facility has 26% fewer deficiencies per inspection than a typical Kansas nursing home (2.6 vs. KS avg 3.5).↓ 26% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | KS Average | vs. KS Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 40 | 24.0 | This facility has had 67% more total inspections than the Kansas average (40 vs. KS avg 24). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 67% more |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Total health inspections
3
↓ 30% · KS 4.3This facility: 3, 30% below the KS average of 4.3 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
13
Rank #11 / 138Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 11th out of 138 nursing homes we track in Kansas for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Kansas State average, with a ranking across all 138 KS facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 53% · KS 27.5This facility: 13, 53% below the KS average of 27.5 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
4.33
Rank #23 / 138Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 23rd out of 138 nursing homes we track in Kansas for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Kansas mean across 138 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 32% · KS 6.37This facility: 4.33, 32% below the KS average of 6.37 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
13 of 13 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · KS 0.8This facility: 0, 100% below the KS average of 0.8 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · KS 0.8This facility: 0, 100% below the KS average of 0.8 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
13
↓ 48% · KS 25.2This facility: 13, 48% below the KS average of 25.2 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · KS 0.7This facility: 0, 100% below the KS average of 0.7 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: May 06, 2025 · 4 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 3 of 13 citations · 8 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
May 06, 2025
4 citations
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Aug 31, 2023
4 citations
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Dec 21, 2021
5 citations
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 13 citations
Quality of Life & Care
3 deficiencies (23%)
Pharmacy Services
3 deficiencies (23%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
2 deficiencies (15%)
Infection Control
1 deficiency (8%)
Resident Rights
1 deficiency (8%)
Nutrition & Dietary
1 deficiency (8%)
Administration
1 deficiency (8%)
Nursing & Physician Services
1 deficiency (8%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
9 of 13 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 4 of 13 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Aug 2023.
Total fines
$0
KS avg $40KKansas average: $40,388. Average among the 151 Kansas facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
KS avg 2.16Kansas average: 2.16. Average among the 151 Kansas facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
KS avg 0.25Kansas average: 0.25. Average among the 151 Kansas facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Kansas average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
2
/ 5
Below average
↓ 32% · KS 3.0This facility: 2.0, 32% below the KS average of 3.0 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
1
/ 5
Significantly below average
↓ 61% · KS 2.6This facility: 1.0, 61% below the KS average of 2.6 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
14.5
Score · lower is better
↑ 52% · KS 9.5This facility: 14.5, 52% above the KS average of 9.5 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
28.3
Score · lower is better
↑ 50% · KS 18.9This facility: 28.3, 50% above the KS average of 18.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 7 better, 5 worse, 1 near KS average
8 short-stay measures: 2 better, 2 worse, 1 near KS average, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
36.7%
↑ 105% · KS 17.9This facility: 36.7, 105% above the KS average of 17.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
36.7%
↑ 105% · KS 17.9This facility: 36.7, 105% above the KS average of 17.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
22.4%
↑ 38% · KS 16.2This facility: 22.4, 38% above the KS average of 16.2 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
22.4%
↑ 38% · KS 16.2This facility: 22.4, 38% above the KS average of 16.2 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
25.7%
↑ 14% · KS 22.6This facility: 25.7, 14% above the KS average of 22.6 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
25.7%
↑ 14% · KS 22.6This facility: 25.7, 14% above the KS average of 22.6 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.2%
↑ 42% · KS 2.9This facility: 4.2, 42% above the KS average of 2.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.2%
↑ 42% · KS 2.9This facility: 4.2, 42% above the KS average of 2.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
9.5%
↑ 123% · KS 4.3This facility: 9.5, 123% above the KS average of 4.3 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
9.5%
↑ 123% · KS 4.3This facility: 9.5, 123% above the KS average of 4.3 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.3%
↓ 48% · KS 4.4This facility: 2.3, 48% below the KS average of 4.4 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.3%
↓ 48% · KS 4.4This facility: 2.3, 48% below the KS average of 4.4 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.4%
↓ 71% · KS 4.9This facility: 1.4, 71% below the KS average of 4.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.4%
↓ 71% · KS 4.9This facility: 1.4, 71% below the KS average of 4.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.0%
↓ 38% · KS 6.5This facility: 4.0, 38% below the KS average of 6.5 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.0%
↓ 38% · KS 6.5This facility: 4.0, 38% below the KS average of 6.5 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.1%
↓ 33% · KS 18.1This facility: 12.1, 33% below the KS average of 18.1 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.1%
↓ 33% · KS 18.1This facility: 12.1, 33% below the KS average of 18.1 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
94.1%
↑ 2% · KS 92.1This facility: 94.1, 2% above the KS average of 92.1 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
94.1%
↑ 2% · KS 92.1This facility: 94.1, 2% above the KS average of 92.1 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 5% · KS 95.5This facility: 100.0, 5% above the KS average of 95.5 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 5% · KS 95.5This facility: 100.0, 5% above the KS average of 95.5 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.99
↓ 46% · KS 1.84This facility: 0.99, 46% below the KS average of 1.84 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.99
↓ 46% · KS 1.84This facility: 0.99, 46% below the KS average of 1.84 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.71
↓ 21% · KS 2.16This facility: 1.71, 21% below the KS average of 2.16 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.71
↓ 21% · KS 2.16This facility: 1.71, 21% below the KS average of 2.16 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
25.9%
↓ 52% · US 53.7This facility: 25.9, 52% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
25.9%
↓ 52% · US 53.7This facility: 25.9, 52% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
26.2%
↓ 48% · US 50.6This facility: 26.2, 48% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
26.2%
↓ 48% · US 50.6This facility: 26.2, 48% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
2.6%
↑ 242% · US 0.8This facility: 2.6, 242% above the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
2.6%
↑ 242% · US 0.8This facility: 2.6, 242% above the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
4.9%
↑ 166% · KS 1.9This facility: 4.9, 166% above the KS average of 1.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
4.9%
↑ 166% · KS 1.9This facility: 4.9, 166% above the KS average of 1.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
78.3%
↑ 3% · KS 76.1This facility: 78.3, 3% above the KS average of 76.1 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
78.3%
↑ 3% · KS 76.1This facility: 78.3, 3% above the KS average of 76.1 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
79.3%
↑ 8% · KS 73.8This facility: 79.3, 8% above the KS average of 73.8 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
79.3%
↑ 8% · KS 73.8This facility: 79.3, 8% above the KS average of 73.8 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
31.7%
↑ 38% · KS 23.0This facility: 31.7, 38% above the KS average of 23.0 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
31.7%
↑ 38% · KS 23.0This facility: 31.7, 38% above the KS average of 23.0 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
4.0%
↓ 66% · KS 11.7This facility: 4.0, 66% below the KS average of 11.7 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
4.0%
↓ 66% · KS 11.7This facility: 4.0, 66% below the KS average of 11.7 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Pine Village’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 139 Kansas nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, and more than last year
−2.6% operating margin
−3.0 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 7 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($0.5M) turns it into a net profit to $0.3M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends more on payroll than most Kansas homes
68.8% payroll share of revenue
KS average 57.3%Rank #14 / 139Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 14th out of 139 nursing homes we track in Kansas for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Kansas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.3M while revenue rose $0.1M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Kansas homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | KS median | Compared with KS homesRank in KS | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $9.1M | +$0.1M | Trend 20172024 | KS median $6.7M | Rank in KS Rank #50 / 139Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 50th out of 139 nursing homes we track in Kansas for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Kansas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 64% of homes | Above KS median Higher net patient revenue than 64% of KS homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $9.3M | +$0.4M | Trend 20172024 | KS median — | Rank in KS Not ranked | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$0.2M | −$0.3M | Trend 20172024 | KS median — | Rank in KS Not ranked | Loss, widening Resident care lost money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −2.6% | −3.0 pts | Trend 20172024 | KS median — | Rank in KS Not ranked | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.5M | — | Trend — | KS median — | Rank in KS Not ranked | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $0.3M | −$0.3M | Trend — | KS median — | Rank in KS Not ranked | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends more of revenue on staff than most Kansas homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | KS median | Compared with KS homesRank in KS | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $6.3M | +$0.3M | Trend 20172024 | KS median $3.6M | Rank in KS Rank #35 / 139Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 35th out of 139 nursing homes we track in Kansas for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Kansas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 75% of homes | Above KS median Higher payroll than 75% of KS homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 68.8% | +2.8 pts | Trend 20172024 | KS median 54.4% | Rank in KS Rank #14 / 139Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 14th out of 139 nursing homes we track in Kansas for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Kansas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 91% of homes | 11.5 pts over KS average The KS average is 57.3% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · KS benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Kansas payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin KS payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $6.6M | $6.9M | $7.1M | $6.5M | $7.5M | $8.6M | $9.0M | $9.1M |
| Operating expenses | $7.0M | $7.2M | $7.9M | $7.8M | $8.1M | $8.6M | $8.9M | $9.3M |
| Net patient income | −$0.3M | −$0.3M | −$0.7M | −$1.3M | −$0.6M | −$0.0M | $0.0M | −$0.2M |
| Operating margin | −5.3% | −4.6% | −10.2% | −19.9% | −8.6% | −0.4% | 0.3% | −2.6% |
| Net income | $0.0M | −$0.0M | −$0.2M | $0.3M | $0.3M | $0.1M | $0.6M | $0.3M |
| Payroll costs | $4.4M | $4.7M | $5.1M | $5.1M | $5.2M | $5.5M | $5.9M | $6.3M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 65.8% | 67.6% | 71.6% | 77.8% | 70.1% | 64.8% | 66.0% | 68.8% |
| Beds | 74 | 74 | 74 | 74 | 74 | 74 | 74 | 74 |
| Gross revenue | $7.0M | $7.1M | $7.4M | $6.9M | $7.8M | $8.4M | $8.8M | $8.9M |
| Salaries | $3.7M | $4.0M | $4.4M | $4.3M | $4.5M | $4.7M | $5.1M | $5.4M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.7M | $0.7M | $0.7M | $0.7M | $0.8M | $0.8M | $0.8M | $0.9M |
| Contract labor | $0.2M | $0.2M | $0.2M | $0.2M | $0.2M | $0.2M | $0.2M | $0.2M |
| Other operating costs | $2.6M | $2.5M | $2.8M | $2.7M | $2.9M | $3.0M | $3.0M | $3.1M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $262 | $275 | $287 | $293 | $312 | $350 | $348 | $362 |
| Cost per day | $276 | $288 | $316 | $351 | $339 | $352 | $346 | $371 |
| Average length of stay | 152.7 days | 208.5 days | 214.1 days | 259.5 days | 254.8 days | 200.0 days | 314.7 days | 273.6 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Jun 2026
Arriving
93 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
21 · 23%
Medicaid
19 · 20%
Private pay & other
53 · 57%
Resident snapshot
66 residents · Jun 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
1 · 2%
Medicaid
30 · 45%
Private pay & other
35 · 53%
Leaving
92 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
17 · 18%
Medicaid
21 · 23%
Private pay & other
54 · 59%
Mix of rehab and long-term care
This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.
Places of interest near Pine Village
0.0 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Moundridge's city center to Pine Village's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Pine Village
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around the area
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the KS Dept. for Aging & Disability Services (KDADS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HC (Home Care):
Professional care delivered in the person's own home, from companionship to skilled nursing.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
ADC (Adult Day Care):
Daytime supervision, health monitoring, and social activities for seniors who live at home.
CCRC (Continuing Care Retirement Community):
A campus with multiple care levels so residents can age in place without moving.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Kansas average is: 57.3% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brookdale Rosehill | NH AL CCRC SNF | Shawnee | 92
Facility
92
KS AVG
74
Rank
#37 / 151 |
83.6%
Facility
83.6%
KS AVG
80.7%
Rank
#85 / 143 | +4% | 4.23
Facility
4.23
KS AVG
4.87
Rank
#87 / 136 | +42% | -13% | $0
Facility
$0
KS AVG
$42.8k
Rank
#1 / 139 | 36
Facility
36
KS AVG
27.5
Rank
#103 / 138 | 9.0
Facility
9.0
KS AVG
6.4
Rank
#117 / 138 | - | 77 | A+ |
54
Facility
54
KS AVG
49
Rank
#71 / 162 | Mary Patchett | $16.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$16.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#15 / 139 | $8.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$5.1M
Rank
#16 / 139 | 53.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
53.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
57.3%
Rank
#76 / 139 | 175478 | ||||
| Claridge Court | NH IL SNF | Prairie Village (Prairie Hills) | 45
Facility
45
KS AVG
74
Rank
#108 / 151 |
84.4%
Facility
84.4%
KS AVG
80.7%
Rank
#72 / 143 | +5% | 4.95
Facility
4.95
KS AVG
4.87
Rank
#44 / 136 | +15% | +2% | $18.0k
Facility
$18.0k
KS AVG
$42.8k
Rank
#89 / 139 | 17
Facility
17
KS AVG
27.5
Rank
#27 / 138 | 5.7
Facility
5.7
KS AVG
6.4
Rank
#55 / 138 | 1 | 38 | - |
64
Facility
64
KS AVG
49
Rank
#43 / 162 | Lifespace Communities Inc | $15.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$15.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#16 / 139 | $7.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$5.1M
Rank
#25 / 139 | 47.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
47.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
57.3%
Rank
#110 / 139 | 175343 | ||||
| Pleasant View Home | NH ADC AL HC IL MC SNF | Inman | 122
Facility
122
KS AVG
74
Rank
#19 / 151 |
91.0%
Facility
91.0%
KS AVG
80.7%
Rank
#30 / 143 | +13% | 6.34
Facility
6.34
KS AVG
4.87
Rank
#5 / 136 | -28% | +30% | $0
Facility
$0
KS AVG
$42.8k
Rank
#1 / 139 | 22
Facility
22
KS AVG
27.5
Rank
#53 / 138 | 5.5
Facility
5.5
KS AVG
6.4
Rank
#50 / 138 | 1 | 111 | - |
31
Facility
31
KS AVG
49
Rank
#119 / 162 | Reno County | $11.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$11.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#29 / 139 | $6.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$6.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$5.1M
Rank
#37 / 139 | 53.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
53.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
57.3%
Rank
#77 / 139 | 175406 | ||||
| Pine Village | NH ADC AL IL MC SNF | Moundridge | 74
Facility
74
KS AVG
74
Rank
#57 / 151 |
89.2%
Facility
89.2%
KS AVG
80.7%
Rank
#44 / 143 | +11% | 6.22
Facility
6.22
KS AVG
4.87
Rank
#16 / 136 | -56% | +28% | $0
Facility
$0
KS AVG
$42.8k
Rank
#1 / 139 | 13
Facility
13
KS AVG
27.5
Rank
#11 / 138 | 4.3
Facility
4.3
KS AVG
6.4
Rank
#23 / 138 | - | 66 | - |
43
Facility
43
KS AVG
49
Rank
#100 / 162 | Memorial Home Inc | $9.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$9.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#50 / 139 | $6.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$6.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$5.1M
Rank
#35 / 139 | 68.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
68.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
57.3%
Rank
#14 / 139 | 175414 | ||||
| Diversicare of Haysville | NH HOS MC SNF | Haysville | 100
Facility
100
KS AVG
74
Rank
#29 / 151 |
100.0%
Facility
100.0%
KS AVG
80.7%
Rank
#75 / 143 | +24% | 2.96
Facility
2.96
KS AVG
4.87
Rank
#132 / 136 | +20% | -39% | $38.3k
Facility
$38.3k
KS AVG
$42.8k
Rank
#114 / 139 | 43
Facility
43
KS AVG
27.5
Rank
#112 / 138 | 7.2
Facility
7.2
KS AVG
6.4
Rank
#93 / 138 | 3 | 91 | - |
61
Facility
61
KS AVG
49
Rank
#48 / 162 | Diversicare Haysville Property LLC | $8.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#52 / 139 | $3.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$3.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$5.1M
Rank
#70 / 139 | 42.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
42.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
57.3%
Rank
#127 / 139 | 175133 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other KS nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Frequently Asked Questions about Pine Village
Who is the owner of Pine Village?
Pine Village is legally operated by Memorial Home Inc, and administered by Eric Schrag.
Is Pine Village in a walkable area?
Pine Village has a walk score of 43. Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
What is the license number of Pine Village?
According to KS state health department records, Pine Village's license number is 175414.
What is the occupancy rate at Pine Village?
Pine Village's occupancy is 89.2%.
Are pets allowed at Pine Village?
No, Pine Village has a no-pet policy.
Does Pine Village operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Pine Village is registered as a non-profit in KS.
Who is the administrator of Pine Village?
Eric Schrag is the administrator of Pine Village.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Updated on
