Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
79
71 employees · 8 contractors · 31 on an average day Pruitthealth – Swainsboro
Nursing Home, Hospice Care & Skilled Nursing · Swainsboro, GA
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Community photos aren’t available yet.
To request photos, use the contact form below.
Pruitthealth – Swainsboro
Nursing Home, Hospice Care & Skilled Nursing · Swainsboro, GA
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Pruitthealth – Swainsboro accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Pruitthealth, Swainsboro is dually certified as a skilled nursing and nursing facility. In practice, that means a bed can bill Medicare during the weeks after a hospital admission and Medicaid later, without a resident moving anywhere. Private funds are the third route, for families whose situation fits neither program.
Infusion services, pharmacy, and medical supply are all named programs. So is Home Health, and Hospice & Palliative Care is on that list too, which keeps a lot of separate arrangements under one roof.
Hospice changes the shape of a week. Appointments stop filling the calendar, and what remains is comfort, company, and symptom relief.
Therapy services support recovery or hold a resident’s daily function steady. A salon operates on site, and religious services are part of the program list.
Nurses are on site at hours when a family is asleep in another county. Nursing time lands at 3 hours and 5 minutes per resident each day across 103 beds. Tracey Nelson is the administrator.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 120th out of 169 nursing homes we track in Georgia for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 5m
This nursing home is ranked 120th out of 169 nursing homes we track in Georgia for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 5mStandout metric: Registered nurse (RN) is +8% above Georgia average
5 of 6 metrics below Georgia average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 7 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
7 staff · 9.4-hour shifts
31m
↑ 8% · GA 29mThis facility: 31m per resident per day, 8% above the Georgia average of 29m (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 7 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
7 staff · 9.4-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 14 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
14 staff · 9.7-hour shifts
45m
↓ 20% · GA 56mThis facility: 45m per resident per day, 20% below the Georgia average of 56m (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 14 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
14 staff · 9.7-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 37 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
37 staff · 9.5-hour shifts
1h 48m
↓ 16% · GA 2h 9mThis facility: 1h 48m per resident per day, 16% below the Georgia average of 2h 9m (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 37 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
37 staff · 9.5-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 20m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 20m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
1m
↓ 76% · GA 3mThis facility: 1m per resident per day, 76% below the Georgia average of 3m (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
2h 23m
↓ 23% · GA 3h 6mThis facility: 2h 23m per resident per day, 23% below the Georgia average of 3h 6m (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
17m
↓ 15% · GA 20mThis facility: 17m per resident per day, 15% below the Georgia average of 20m (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 28m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 28m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
79
71 employees · 8 contractors · 31 on an average day
79 total staff / 78 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.01 : 1
↓ 29% · GA 1.43This facility: 1.01 staff per resident, 29% below the Georgia average of 1.43 (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
79 staff ÷ 78 residents
See full Georgia ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8.9 h
↑ 7% · GA 8.3 hThis facility: 8.9 h, 7% above the Georgia average of 8.3 h (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
25,078 staff hours this quarter
See full Georgia ranking →94.7% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Georgia average: 94.3% · Contractors this quarter: Respiratory Therapy Technician (2), Physical Therapy Aide (2), Physical Therapy Assistant (2), Qualified Social Worker (1), Speech Language Pathologist (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
103
Rank #95 / 206Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 95th out of 206 nursing homes we track in Georgia for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Georgia facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
103
Rank #95 / 206Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 95th out of 206 nursing homes we track in Georgia for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Georgia facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
Years of operating
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #45 / 189Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 45th out of 189 nursing homes we track in Georgia for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Georgia facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #45 / 189Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 45th out of 189 nursing homes we track in Georgia for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Georgia facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
49
years
Walk Score
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #77 / 210Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 77th out of 210 nursing homes we track in Georgia for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Georgia facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #77 / 210Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 77th out of 210 nursing homes we track in Georgia for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Georgia facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
57
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #120 / 161Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 120th out of 161 nursing homes we track in Georgia for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Georgia average, with its Statewide rank out of 161. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #120 / 161Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 120th out of 161 nursing homes we track in Georgia for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Georgia average, with its Statewide rank out of 161. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
77.3%
This home usually has availability
Based on 79.6 residents and 103 beds. Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Lower than the Georgia average: 83.6%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
181
days
About This Community
Facility TypeNursing Home
StatusSnf/Nf Dual Cert
IssuanceJuly 1, 1977
CountyEmanuel
CMS Certification Number115533
AHCA/NCAL National Quality Award — BronzeA three-tier quality program from the American Health Care Association / National Center for Assisted Living, based on the Baldrige performance-excellence framework. Bronze recognizes a documented quality commitment; Silver and Gold require demonstrated, externally reviewed outcomes and are progressively rarer.
QAPI AccreditedAn externally reviewed Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement program. QAPI is the CMS framework for systematic quality improvement; external accreditation of it indicates the community's quality processes were independently audited.
PruittHealth Fitness Program — PruittHealthA branded program developed by this community's operator or its partners - a named approach to programming or care, rather than an independent external certification.
Pruitthealth – Swainsboro is administered by Tracey Nelson.
Resident Council
Family Council
Outpatient Therapy
Physical Therapy
Occupational Therapy
Speech Therapy
IV Therapy
Wound Care ManagementClinical care for preventing, assessing, and treating wounds, including pressure injuries and surgical wounds. It can support healing and reduce complications.
Pain Management
Central Lines
Oxygen Therapy
Enteral Feeding
Infusion Services
Hospice & Palliative Care
Laundry & Linen
Pets not allowed
Beauty Salon
Plasma Screen Tv In Patient Living Areas
Sunlit Dining Area
Nautilus and Biodex Fitness EquipmentStrength-training and rehabilitation machines from Nautilus and Biodex support targeted exercise, helping older adults build strength, improve mobility, and regain independence after illness or surgery.
Volunteer Program
Chaplain/Counseling Services
Religious AffiliationYes
Room Types
Private Room
Semi-Private / Shared Room
This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ. Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file — covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification surveys.
Inspection History
In Georgia, the Department of Community Health, Healthcare Facility Regulation Division conducts unannounced inspections to ensure facilities adhere to state health and safety requirements.
Since 2017 · 9 years of data
These figures come from state-published data and the state inspection reports we hold on file. The period covered can vary depending on document availability.
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 26 deficiencies 24 inspections
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 26 deficiencies 24 inspections
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Georgia state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Since 2017 vs. Georgia state average
Overall vs. GA average
2 Worse
Metrics worse than Georgia average:
• Total deficiencies (37% above)
• Deficiencies per inspection (10% above) 0 Better No metrics in this bucket.
• Total deficiencies (37% above)
• Deficiencies per inspection (10% above) 0 Better No metrics in this bucket.
Deficiencies
| This Facility | GA Average | vs. GA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 26 | 19.0 | This facility has 37% more total deficiencies than a typical Georgia nursing home (26 vs. GA avg 19).↑ 37% worse |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
Average deficiencies per inspection.
| 1.1 | 1.0 | This facility has 10% more deficiencies per inspection than a typical Georgia nursing home (1.1 vs. GA avg 1).↑ 10% worse |
Inspections
| This Facility | GA Average | vs. GA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 24 | 16.0 | This facility has had 50% more total inspections than the Georgia average (24 vs. GA avg 16). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 50% more |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Total health inspections
2
↓ 43% · GA 3.5This facility: 2, 43% below the GA average of 3.5 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
6
Rank #17 / 170Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 17th out of 170 nursing homes we track in Georgia for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Georgia State average, with a ranking across all 170 GA facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 64% · GA 16.9This facility: 6, 64% below the GA average of 16.9 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
3
Rank #30 / 170Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 30th out of 170 nursing homes we track in Georgia for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Georgia mean across 170 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 36% · GA 4.7This facility: 3, 36% below the GA average of 4.7 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
83% corrected
5 of 6 citations corrected · 1 still open
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · GA 0.6This facility: 0, 100% below the GA average of 0.6 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
1
↑ 100% · GA 0.5This facility: 1, 100% above the GA average of 0.5 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
0% corrected · 1 open
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
5
↓ 68% · GA 15.7This facility: 5, 68% below the GA average of 15.7 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
100% corrected
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · GA 0.1This facility: 0, 100% below the GA average of 0.1 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Apr 23, 2026 · 3 citations, 2 corrected
Most cited category: Resident Rights, 2 of 6 citations · 5 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Apr 23, 2026
3 citations
Abuse/Neglect serious citation
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 06, 2025
3 citations
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 6 citations
Resident Rights
2 deficiencies (33%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
1 deficiency (17%)
Quality of Life & Care
1 deficiency (17%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
1 deficiency (17%)
Pharmacy Services
1 deficiency (17%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
2 of 6 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 4 of 6 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Oct 2023.
Total fines
$0
GA avg $35KGeorgia average: $35,339. Average among the 124 Georgia facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
GA avg 1.6Georgia average: 1.6. Average among the 124 Georgia facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
GA avg 0.35Georgia average: 0.35. Average among the 124 Georgia facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Georgia average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
3
/ 5
Average
↓ 4% · GA 3.1This facility: 3.0, 4% below the GA average of 3.1 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
1
/ 5
Significantly below average
↓ 55% · GA 2.2This facility: 1.0, 55% below the GA average of 2.2 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
3.1
Score · lower is better
↓ 64% · GA 8.5This facility: 3.1, 64% below the GA average of 8.5 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
3.7
Score · lower is better
↓ 75% · GA 14.7This facility: 3.7, 75% below the GA average of 14.7 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 9 better, 1 worse, 1 near GA average
7 short-stay measures: 2 better, 1 worse, 2 near GA average, 2 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.9%
↓ 67% · GA 14.9This facility: 4.9, 67% below the GA average of 14.9 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.9%
↓ 67% · GA 14.9This facility: 4.9, 67% below the GA average of 14.9 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
2.1%
↓ 84% · GA 13.7This facility: 2.1, 84% below the GA average of 13.7 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
2.1%
↓ 84% · GA 13.7This facility: 2.1, 84% below the GA average of 13.7 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
4.1%
↓ 73% · GA 15.4This facility: 4.1, 73% below the GA average of 15.4 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
4.1%
↓ 73% · GA 15.4This facility: 4.1, 73% below the GA average of 15.4 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.8%
↓ 23% · GA 2.4This facility: 1.8, 23% below the GA average of 2.4 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.8%
↓ 23% · GA 2.4This facility: 1.8, 23% below the GA average of 2.4 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.2%
≈ 0% · GA 3.2This facility: 3.2, level with the GA average of 3.2 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.2%
≈ 0% · GA 3.2This facility: 3.2, level with the GA average of 3.2 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.4%
↓ 37% · GA 5.4This facility: 3.4, 37% below the GA average of 5.4 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.4%
↓ 37% · GA 5.4This facility: 3.4, 37% below the GA average of 5.4 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.7%
↓ 69% · GA 5.4This facility: 1.7, 69% below the GA average of 5.4 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.7%
↓ 69% · GA 5.4This facility: 1.7, 69% below the GA average of 5.4 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.3%
↓ 72% · GA 11.7This facility: 3.3, 72% below the GA average of 11.7 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.3%
↓ 72% · GA 11.7This facility: 3.3, 72% below the GA average of 11.7 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
26.9%
↑ 36% · GA 19.8This facility: 26.9, 36% above the GA average of 19.8 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
26.9%
↑ 36% · GA 19.8This facility: 26.9, 36% above the GA average of 19.8 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.9%
↑ 8% · GA 91.7This facility: 98.9, 8% above the GA average of 91.7 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.9%
↑ 8% · GA 91.7This facility: 98.9, 8% above the GA average of 91.7 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 6% · GA 94.6This facility: 100.0, 6% above the GA average of 94.6 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 6% · GA 94.6This facility: 100.0, 6% above the GA average of 94.6 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 7 measures
Daily care & independence
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
51.7%
↑ 2% · US 50.6This facility: 51.7, 2% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
51.7%
↑ 2% · US 50.6This facility: 51.7, 2% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.2%
↓ 11% · GA 2.4This facility: 2.2, 11% below the GA average of 2.4 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.2%
↓ 11% · GA 2.4This facility: 2.2, 11% below the GA average of 2.4 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
84.0%
↑ 4% · GA 80.6This facility: 84.0, 4% above the GA average of 80.6 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
84.0%
↑ 4% · GA 80.6This facility: 84.0, 4% above the GA average of 80.6 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
76.4%
↓ 3% · GA 78.7This facility: 76.4, 3% below the GA average of 78.7 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
76.4%
↓ 3% · GA 78.7This facility: 76.4, 3% below the GA average of 78.7 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
36.1%
↑ 49% · GA 24.2This facility: 36.1, 49% above the GA average of 24.2 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
36.1%
↑ 49% · GA 24.2This facility: 36.1, 49% above the GA average of 24.2 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
10.4%
↓ 15% · GA 12.2This facility: 10.4, 15% below the GA average of 12.2 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
10.4%
↓ 15% · GA 12.2This facility: 10.4, 15% below the GA average of 12.2 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Pruitthealth – Swainsboro’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending June 2025, compared with 164 Georgia nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Jun 2025
Is it financially stable?
Breaking even on care
3.9% operating margin
−14.5 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 2 of the last 8 reported years. Net income $0.5M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Georgia homes
51.0% payroll share of revenue
GA average 56.1%Rank #89 / 164Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 89th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Georgia for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Georgia average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.9M while revenue fell $0.2M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2025 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2025 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Georgia homes.
Revenue & profit
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2025 | vs prior year | Trend 2018 → 2025Trend | GA median | Compared with GA homesRank in GA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $8.7M | −$0.2M | Trend 20182025 | GA median $10.4M | Rank in GA Rank #102 / 164Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 102nd out of 164 nursing homes we track in Georgia for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Georgia average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 38% of homes | Below GA median Higher net patient revenue than 38% of GA homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $8.4M | +$1.1M | Trend 20182025 | GA median $11.3M | Rank in GA Rank #122 / 164Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 122nd out of 164 nursing homes we track in Georgia for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Georgia homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 26% of homes | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $0.3M | −$1.3M | Trend 20182025 | GA median −$0.1M | Rank in GA Rank #50 / 164Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 50th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Georgia for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Georgia homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 70% of homes | Profit, shrinking Resident care made money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 3.9% | −14.5 pts | Trend 20182025 | GA median −1.3% | Rank in GA Rank #45 / 164Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 45th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Georgia for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Georgia homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 73% of homes | Thin margin A margin from 0% to 5% of revenue leaves little room for unexpected costs. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.1M | — | Trend — | GA median $0.1M | Rank in GA Rank #47 / 162Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 47th out of 162 nursing homes we track in Georgia for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Georgia homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 71% of homes | Adds to profit Income from outside resident care, on top of the profit from care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $0.5M | −$1.3M | Trend — | GA median $0.0M | Rank in GA Rank #51 / 164Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 51st out of 164 nursing homes we track in Georgia for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Georgia homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 69% of homes | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Georgia homes
| Metric | FY 2025 | vs prior year | Trend 2018 → 2025Trend | GA median | Compared with GA homesRank in GA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $4.5M | +$0.9M | Trend 20182025 | GA median $5.5M | Rank in GA Rank #108 / 164Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 108th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Georgia for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Georgia average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 34% of homes | Below GA median Higher payroll than 34% of GA homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 51.0% | +11.0 pts | Trend 20182025 | GA median 51.6% | Rank in GA Rank #89 / 164Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 89th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Georgia for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Georgia average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 46% of homes | 5.1 pts under GA average The GA average is 56.1% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2018–2025 2 charts · GA benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Georgia payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin GA payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2018–2025 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $6.1M | $6.3M | $6.0M | $5.1M | $6.0M | $6.7M | $8.9M | $8.7M |
| Operating expenses | $6.5M | $6.6M | $6.5M | $6.2M | $6.1M | $6.7M | $7.3M | $8.4M |
| Net patient income | −$0.5M | −$0.3M | −$0.5M | −$1.1M | −$0.0M | −$0.1M | $1.6M | $0.3M |
| Operating margin | −7.6% | −4.1% | −8.8% | −22.3% | −0.7% | −1.2% | 18.4% | 3.9% |
| Net income | −$0.4M | −$0.2M | −$0.5M | −$0.3M | $0.4M | $0.3M | $1.8M | $0.5M |
| Payroll costs | $3.0M | $3.1M | $3.2M | $2.9M | $2.9M | $3.3M | $3.6M | $4.5M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 50.0% | 49.0% | 53.9% | 56.8% | 48.4% | 49.9% | 40.0% | 51.0% |
| Beds | 103 | 103 | 103 | 103 | 103 | 103 | 103 | 103 |
| Gross revenue | $8.4M | $8.5M | $7.9M | $6.2M | $6.3M | $8.4M | $9.8M | $10.2M |
| Salaries | $2.6M | $2.6M | $2.8M | $2.5M | $2.6M | $2.9M | $3.2M | $3.9M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.5M | $0.5M | $0.5M | $0.4M | $0.3M | $0.4M | $0.4M | $0.6M |
| Contract labor | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other operating costs | $3.5M | $3.5M | $3.3M | $3.3M | $3.1M | $3.4M | $3.7M | $3.9M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $211 | $220 | $226 | $257 | $298 | $260 | $305 | $305 |
| Cost per day | $227 | $229 | $246 | $314 | $301 | $263 | $249 | $293 |
| Average length of stay | 108.4 days | 186.8 days | 187.3 days | 137.9 days | 171.0 days | 117.5 days | 179.6 days | 181.2 days |
Showing 2025–2023 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2025
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
129 admissions · FY2025
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
22 · 17%
Medicaid
17 · 13%
Private pay & other
90 · 70%
Resident snapshot
78 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
0 · 0%
Medicaid
68 · 87%
Private pay & other
10 · 13%
Leaving
158 discharges · FY2025
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
30 · 19%
Medicaid
47 · 30%
Private pay & other
81 · 51%
Primarily short stays
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Places of interest near Pruitthealth – Swainsboro
0.0 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Swainsboro's city center to Pruitthealth – Swainsboro's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Pruitthealth – Swainsboro
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around the area
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the GA Dept. of Community Health (DCH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Georgia average is: 56.1% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The William Breman Jewish Home | NH SNF | Atlanta (Buckhead) | 96
Facility
96
GA AVG
113
Rank
#125 / 206 |
91.0%
Facility
91.0%
GA AVG
83.6%
Rank
#49 / 161 | +9% | 4.73
Facility
4.73
GA AVG
3.58
Rank
#14 / 169 | -59% | +32% | $0
Facility
$0
GA AVG
$40.0k
Rank
#1 / 172 | 7
Facility
7
GA AVG
16.9
Rank
#20 / 170 | 2.3
Facility
2.3
GA AVG
4.7
Rank
#15 / 170 | - | 87 | A+ |
23
Facility
23
GA AVG
44
Rank
#164 / 210 | Jeffrey Gopen | $14.2MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$14.2MFiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
$13.5M
Rank
#53 / 164 | $8.8MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$8.8MFiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
$6.0M
Rank
#23 / 164 | 62.2%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
62.2%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
56.1%
Rank
#26 / 164 | 115022 | ||||
| Salude – the Art of Recovery | NH SNF | Suwanee | 64
Facility
64
GA AVG
113
Rank
#171 / 206 |
91.7%
Facility
91.7%
GA AVG
83.6%
Rank
#39 / 161 | +10% | 3.79
Facility
3.79
GA AVG
3.58
Rank
#43 / 169 | +33% | +6% | $0
Facility
$0
GA AVG
$40.0k
Rank
#1 / 172 | 1
Facility
1
GA AVG
16.9
Rank
#1 / 170 | 1.0
Facility
1.0
GA AVG
4.7
Rank
#1 / 170 | - | 59 | - |
43
Facility
43
GA AVG
44
Rank
#120 / 210 | Macondray Lane LP | $14.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$14.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
GA AVG
$13.5M
Rank
#48 / 164 | $5.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
GA AVG
$6.0M
Rank
#73 / 164 | 39.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
39.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
GA AVG
56.1%
Rank
#147 / 164 | 115723 | ||||
| Cedar Valley Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | NH MC SNF | Cedartown | 100
Facility
100
GA AVG
113
Rank
#99 / 206 |
85.3%
Facility
85.3%
GA AVG
83.6%
Rank
#96 / 161 | +2% | 3.78
Facility
3.78
GA AVG
3.58
Rank
#43 / 169 | +33% | +6% | $0
Facility
$0
GA AVG
$40.0k
Rank
#1 / 172 | 3
Facility
3
GA AVG
16.9
Rank
#5 / 170 | 1.0
Facility
1.0
GA AVG
4.7
Rank
#1 / 170 | - | 85 | - |
63
Facility
63
GA AVG
44
Rank
#53 / 210 | Rhonda Blankenship | $7.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
GA AVG
$13.5M
Rank
#117 / 164 | $2.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$2.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
GA AVG
$6.0M
Rank
#157 / 164 | 31.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
31.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
GA AVG
56.1%
Rank
#153 / 164 | 115436 | ||||
| Magnolia Manor of Marion County | NH AL IL MC SNF | Buena Vista | 70
Facility
70
GA AVG
113
Rank
#161 / 206 |
89.3%
Facility
89.3%
GA AVG
83.6%
Rank
#65 / 161 | +7% | 5.28
Facility
5.28
GA AVG
3.58
Rank
#8 / 169 | -2% | +47% | $0
Facility
$0
GA AVG
$40.0k
Rank
#1 / 172 | 14
Facility
14
GA AVG
16.9
Rank
#70 / 170 | 4.7
Facility
4.7
GA AVG
4.7
Rank
#87 / 170 | - | 63 | - |
50
Facility
50
GA AVG
44
Rank
#99 / 210 | Angela Watkins | $6.9MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$6.9MFiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
$13.5M
Rank
#126 / 164 | $4.4MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$4.4MFiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
$6.0M
Rank
#109 / 164 | 64.5%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
64.5%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
56.1%
Rank
#17 / 164 | 115599 | ||||
| Pruitthealth – Swainsboro | NH HOS SNF | South Swainsboro | 103
Facility
103
GA AVG
113
Rank
#95 / 206 |
77.3%
Facility
77.3%
GA AVG
83.6%
Rank
#120 / 161 | -7% | 3.08
Facility
3.08
GA AVG
3.58
Rank
#120 / 169 | +4% | -14% | $0
Facility
$0
GA AVG
$40.0k
Rank
#1 / 172 | 6
Facility
6
GA AVG
16.9
Rank
#17 / 170 | 3.0
Facility
3.0
GA AVG
4.7
Rank
#30 / 170 | 1 | 80 | - |
57
Facility
57
GA AVG
44
Rank
#77 / 210 | Tiffany Clifton | $8.7MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$8.7MFiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
$13.5M
Rank
#102 / 164 | $4.5MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$4.5MFiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
$6.0M
Rank
#108 / 164 | 51%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
51%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
56.1%
Rank
#89 / 164 | 115533 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other GA nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Pruitthealth – Swainsboro
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Is Pruitthealth – Swainsboro in a walkable area?
Pruitthealth – Swainsboro has a walk score of 57. Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
02 What is the occupancy rate at Pruitthealth – Swainsboro?
Pruitthealth – Swainsboro's occupancy is 77.3%.
03 How long has Pruitthealth – Swainsboro been in business?
Pruitthealth – Swainsboro has been operating for approximately 49 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
04 Are pets allowed at Pruitthealth – Swainsboro?
No, Pruitthealth – Swainsboro has a no-pet policy.
05 What is the best email address for Pruitthealth – Swainsboro?
The team at Pruitthealth – Swainsboro can be reached at tracey.nelson@pruitthealth.com.
06 Does Pruitthealth – Swainsboro operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Pruitthealth – Swainsboro is registered as a for-profit in GA.
07 Who is the administrator of Pruitthealth – Swainsboro?
Tracey Nelson is the administrator of Pruitthealth – Swainsboro.
Updated on
