Red Mountain at Gateway
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Hospice Care, Memory Care, Palliative Care & Respite Care · Gilbert, AZ
Red Mountain at Gateway
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Hospice Care, Memory Care, Palliative Care & Respite Care · Gilbert, AZ
Located in the peaceful neighborhood of South Stuart Avenue, Gilbert, AZ, Red Mountain at Gateway goes above and beyond to provide the finest retirement experience with a wide array of care options. These include assisted living, memory care, palliative care, respite care, nursing home, and hospice. Keep peace of mind with a team of reliable and highly trained professionals taking care of household responsibilities and personal hygiene 24/7.
The community promotes a bright and friendly environment by conducting a robust calendar of engaging events and enjoyable programs. Have the finest dining experience with delicious and healthy meals catering to dietary needs and preferences. Red Mountain at Gateway is great for seniors looking to make the most out of their best years while receiving the utmost care and assistance they deserve.
10-bed community Rank #237 / 521Bed count — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 237th out of 521 homes we track in Arizona for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Arizona facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
3 years in operation Rank #434 / 548Years in operation — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 434th out of 548 homes we track in Arizona for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Arizona facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
An established community with some operational experience and growing routines.
Walk Score: 35 / 100 Rank #423 / 775Walk Score — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 423rd out of 775 homes we track in Arizona for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Arizona facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Somewhat walkable. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
About this community
Facility TypeAssisted Living Home
IssuanceFebruary 17, 2023
License NumberAL12480H
QualificationHealth Care
Red Mountain at Gateway is administered by Jeannette M Zerilli.
Inspection History
In Arizona, the Department of Health Services, Bureau of Long Term Care Licensing performs regular onsite inspections and investigates complaints for all licensed residential and nursing facilities.
Since 2023 · 3 years of data
These figures come from state-published and/or federal inspection records. The period covered can vary depending on document availability.
12 deficiencies
3 complaints
3 inspections
Inspection Score
A composite 0–100 score combining this facility's inspections, deficiencies, complaints, and enforcement actions relative to the Arizona state average. The score below shows how many points this facility sits above or below the typical Arizona nursing home score (the benchmark); higher is better.This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine score.
A composite 0–100 score combining this facility's inspections, deficiencies, complaints, and enforcement actions relative to the Arizona state average. The score below shows how many points this facility sits above or below the typical Arizona nursing home score (the benchmark); higher is better.This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine score.
3 points above the Arizona average for nursing homes (82/100)
Rank #108 / 290 in Arizona Inspection Score — State benchmarked This home is ranked 108th out of 290 homes we track in Arizona for inspection score. Shows this facility's inspection score compared to the Arizona average among 290 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine score. Inspection score: 85 out of 100. Letter grade B. 3 points above the Arizona average for nursing homes (82/100)
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Arizona state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Since 2023 vs. Arizona state average
Overall vs. AZ average
2 Worse
Metrics worse than Arizona average:
• Total deficiencies (33% above)
• Deficiencies per inspection (122% above) 3 Better Metrics better than Arizona average:
• Enforcement actions (100% below)
• Total complaints (50% below)
• Complaints per year (50% below)
• Total deficiencies (33% above)
• Deficiencies per inspection (122% above) 3 Better Metrics better than Arizona average:
• Enforcement actions (100% below)
• Total complaints (50% below)
• Complaints per year (50% below)
Deficiencies
| This Facility | AZ Average | vs. AZ Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 12 | 9 | This facility has 33% more total deficiencies than a typical Arizona nursing home (12 vs. AZ avg 9).↑ 33% worse Rank #258 / 400 Total deficiencies — State benchmarked This home is ranked 258th out of 400 homes we track in Arizona for deficiencies. Shows this facility's deficiencies compared to the Arizona average among 400 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
Average deficiencies per inspection.
| 4.0 | 1.8 | This facility has 122% more deficiencies per inspection than a typical Arizona nursing home (4 vs. AZ avg 1.8).↑ 122% worse Rank #308 / 400 Deficiencies per inspection — State benchmarked This home is ranked 308th out of 400 homes we track in Arizona for deficiencies per inspection. Shows this facility's deficiencies per inspection compared to the Arizona average among 400 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. |
|
Enforcement actions
Formal penalties or interventions imposed by Arizona regulators — directed plans of correction, civil monetary penalties, denial of payment, or appointment of temporary management.
| 0 | 0.9 | This facility has 100% fewer enforcement actions than a typical Arizona nursing home (0 vs. AZ avg 0.9).↓ 100% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | AZ Average | vs. AZ Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 3 | 5 | This facility has had 40% fewer total inspections than the Arizona average (3 vs. AZ avg 5). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 40% fewer |
Complaints & Investigations
| This Facility | AZ Average | vs. AZ Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total complaints
Formal expressions of concern made by residents, families, or staff.
| 3 | 6 | This facility has 50% fewer total complaints than a typical Arizona nursing home (3 vs. AZ avg 6).↓ 50% better Rank #320 / 486 Total complaints — State benchmarked This home is ranked 320th out of 486 homes we track in Arizona for complaint-related visits. Shows this facility's complaint-related visits compared to the Arizona average among 486 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. |
|
Complaints per year
Average complaints per year since 2023.
| 1 | 2 | This facility has 50% fewer complaints per year than a typical Arizona nursing home (1 vs. AZ avg 2).↓ 50% better |
What does this home offer?
No pets allowed
Housing Options: Private Rooms
Building Type: Single-story
Transportation Services
Fitness and Recreation
Type of Rooms Available
1 / 4
Private Rooms
Places of interest near Red Mountain at Gateway
4.3 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Gilbert's city center to Red Mountain at Gateway's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Red Mountain at Gateway
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Gilbert
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the AZ Dept. of Health Services (ADHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest to lowest based on our ranking methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
A composite 0–100 score combining this facility's inspections, citations, complaints, and enforcement actions relative to the state average. See the benchmark below for the typical score in this state; higher is better.
This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine score.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Arizona average is: 64.5% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Center at Val Vista | NH SNF | Gilbert | 96
Facility
96
AZ AVG
54
Rank
#140 / 521 |
61.5%
Facility
61.5%
AZ AVG
71.2
Rank
#38 / 55 | -14% | 3.39
Facility
3.39
AZ AVG
4.06
Rank
#42 / 59 | -65% | -17% | $0
Facility
$0
AZ AVG
$31.7k
Rank
#1 / 61 | 93
Facility
93
AZ AVG
82
Rank
#58 / 290 | 6
Facility
6
AZ AVG
23.2
Rank
#7 / 61 | 2.0
Facility
2.0
AZ AVG
3.8
Rank
#6 / 61 | - | 59 | - | - | Monte Murdock | $16.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$16.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
$15.3M
Rank
#19 / 58 | $7.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$7.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
$8.6M
Rank
#29 / 58 | 43.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
43.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
64.5%
Rank
#52 / 58 | 35291 | ||||
| Wellsprings Therapy Center of Gilbert | NH SNF | Gilbert | 32
Facility
32
AZ AVG
54
Rank
#226 / 521 |
94.7%
Facility
94.7%
AZ AVG
71.2
Rank
#8 / 55 | +33% | 3.61
Facility
3.61
AZ AVG
4.06
Rank
#38 / 59 | -14% | -11% | $0
Facility
$0
AZ AVG
$31.7k
Rank
#1 / 61 | - | 4
Facility
4
AZ AVG
23.2
Rank
#2 / 61 | 4.0
Facility
4.0
AZ AVG
3.8
Rank
#38 / 61 | - | 30 | - |
27
Facility
27
AZ AVG
38
Rank
#514 / 775 | Nick Narducci | $4.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$4.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
$15.3M
Rank
#56 / 58 | $3.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$3.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
$8.6M
Rank
#57 / 58 | 66.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
66.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
64.5%
Rank
#12 / 58 | 35285 |
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Arizona
Red Mountain at Gateway is located in Gilbert, Arizona.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Arizona.
Frequently Asked Questions about Red Mountain at Gateway
What neighborhood is Red Mountain at Gateway in?
Red Mountain at Gateway is in the Gateway Ranch neighborhood of Gilbert.
Is Red Mountain at Gateway in a walkable area?
Red Mountain at Gateway has a walk score of 35. Somewhat walkable. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
What is the license number of Red Mountain at Gateway?
According to AZ state health department records, Red Mountain at Gateway's license number is AL12480H.
How long has Red Mountain at Gateway been in business?
Red Mountain at Gateway has been operating for approximately 3 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
Are pets allowed at Red Mountain at Gateway?
No, Red Mountain at Gateway has a no-pet policy.
Who is the administrator of Red Mountain at Gateway?
Jeannette M Zerilli is the administrator of Red Mountain at Gateway.
How many beds does Red Mountain at Gateway have?
Red Mountain at Gateway has 10 beds.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Updated on
