Red Mountain Mesa
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Hospice Care, Memory Care, Palliative Care & Respite Care · Mesa, AZ
Red Mountain Mesa
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Hospice Care, Memory Care, Palliative Care & Respite Care · Mesa, AZ
Enticing seniors and guests with its beautiful and welcoming spaces, Red Mountain Mesa in East Culver Mesa, AZ goes above and beyond to provide the finest care and assistance with a wide range of care options including assisted living, memory care, palliative care, respite care, nursing care, and hospice. With maintenance and housekeeping taken care of by a kind and reliable team, seniors enjoy a hassle-free lifestyle. The community ensures seniors receive the utmost care and assistance they deserve by creating care plans tailored to their needs and preferences.
A jam-packed calendar of engaging events and enjoyable programs accompanies residents as they try new things and rediscover old interests. Have a delightful dining experience with dining options prepared based on residents’ dietary needs and tastes. Red Mountain Mesa is ideal for seniors aiming to optimize their freedom while having a trusted community by their side.
10-bed community Rank #237 / 521Bed count — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 237th out of 521 homes we track in Arizona for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Arizona facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
31 years in operation Rank #33 / 548Years in operation — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 33rd out of 548 homes we track in Arizona for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Arizona facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care.
Walk Score: 2 / 100 Rank #766 / 775Walk Score — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 766th out of 775 homes we track in Arizona for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Arizona facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
BBB Rating: A+ (Not Accredited)
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
How BBB ratings work
How BBB ratings work
About this community
Facility TypeAssisted Living Home
IssuanceJanuary 4, 1999
License NumberAL0783H
QualificationHealth Care
Red Mountain Mesa is administered by Anthony Zerilli.
Staffing
Key information about the people who lead and staff this community.
ContactLoren MacDonald (per state records, record updated Jul 2026)
Inspection History
In Arizona, the Department of Health Services, Bureau of Long Term Care Licensing performs regular onsite inspections and investigates complaints for all licensed residential and nursing facilities.
Inspection Score
A composite 0–100 score combining this facility's inspections, deficiencies, complaints, and enforcement actions relative to the Arizona state average. The score below shows how many points this facility sits above or below the typical Arizona nursing home score (the benchmark); higher is better.This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine score.
A composite 0–100 score combining this facility's inspections, deficiencies, complaints, and enforcement actions relative to the Arizona state average. The score below shows how many points this facility sits above or below the typical Arizona nursing home score (the benchmark); higher is better.This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine score.
8 points above the Arizona average for nursing homes (82/100)
Rank #77 / 290 in Arizona Inspection Score — State benchmarked This home is ranked 77th out of 290 homes we track in Arizona for inspection score. Shows this facility's inspection score compared to the Arizona average among 290 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine score. Inspection score: 90 out of 100. Letter grade A-. 8 points above the Arizona average for nursing homes (82/100)
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Arizona state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Overall vs. AZ average
1 Worse
Metrics worse than Arizona average:
• Deficiencies per inspection (11% above) 3 Better Metrics better than Arizona average:
• Total deficiencies (11% below)
• Enforcement actions (100% below)
• Total complaints (33% below)
• Deficiencies per inspection (11% above) 3 Better Metrics better than Arizona average:
• Total deficiencies (11% below)
• Enforcement actions (100% below)
• Total complaints (33% below)
Deficiencies
| This Facility | AZ Average | vs. AZ Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 8 | 9 | This facility has 11% fewer total deficiencies than a typical Arizona nursing home (8 vs. AZ avg 9).↓ 11% better Rank #183 / 400 Total deficiencies — State benchmarked This home is ranked 183rd out of 400 homes we track in Arizona for deficiencies. Shows this facility's deficiencies compared to the Arizona average among 400 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
Average deficiencies per inspection.
| 2.0 | 1.8 | This facility has 11% more deficiencies per inspection than a typical Arizona nursing home (2 vs. AZ avg 1.8).↑ 11% worse Rank #173 / 400 Deficiencies per inspection — State benchmarked This home is ranked 173rd out of 400 homes we track in Arizona for deficiencies per inspection. Shows this facility's deficiencies per inspection compared to the Arizona average among 400 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. |
|
Enforcement actions
Formal penalties or interventions imposed by Arizona regulators — directed plans of correction, civil monetary penalties, denial of payment, or appointment of temporary management.
| 0 | 0.9 | This facility has 100% fewer enforcement actions than a typical Arizona nursing home (0 vs. AZ avg 0.9).↓ 100% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | AZ Average | vs. AZ Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 4 | 5 | This facility has had 20% fewer total inspections than the Arizona average (4 vs. AZ avg 5). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 20% fewer |
Complaints & Investigations
| This Facility | AZ Average | vs. AZ Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total complaints
Formal expressions of concern made by residents, families, or staff.
| 4 | 6 | This facility has 33% fewer total complaints than a typical Arizona nursing home (4 vs. AZ avg 6).↓ 33% better Rank #350 / 486 Total complaints — State benchmarked This home is ranked 350th out of 486 homes we track in Arizona for complaint-related visits. Shows this facility's complaint-related visits compared to the Arizona average among 486 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. |
What does this home offer?
Building Type: Single-story
Transportation Services
Fitness and Recreation
Type of Rooms Available
1 / 4
Private Rooms
Places of interest near Red Mountain Mesa
8411 E Culver St, Mesa, AZ 85207
Calculate Travel Distance to Red Mountain Mesa
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Mesa
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the AZ Dept. of Health Services (ADHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest to lowest based on our ranking methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
A composite 0–100 score combining this facility's inspections, citations, complaints, and enforcement actions relative to the state average. See the benchmark below for the typical score in this state; higher is better.
This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine score.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Arizona average is: 64.5% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alta Mesa Health and Rehabilitation | NH SNF | Mesa | 70
Facility
70
AZ AVG
54
Rank
#178 / 521 |
97.1%
Facility
97.1%
AZ AVG
71.2
Rank
#2 / 55 | +36% | 3.35
Facility
3.35
AZ AVG
4.06
Rank
#42 / 59 | -39% | -17% | $0
Facility
$0
AZ AVG
$31.7k
Rank
#1 / 61 | 81
Facility
81
AZ AVG
82
Rank
#142 / 290 | 11
Facility
11
AZ AVG
23.2
Rank
#15 / 61 | 3.7
Facility
3.7
AZ AVG
3.8
Rank
#34 / 61 | - | 68 | D- |
38
Facility
38
AZ AVG
38
Rank
#385 / 775 | Alta Mesa Health And Rehabilitation | $10.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$10.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
$15.3M
Rank
#40 / 58 | $6.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$6.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
$8.6M
Rank
#40 / 58 | 57.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
57.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
64.5%
Rank
#23 / 58 | 35171 | ||||
| Citadel Post Acute | NH MC SNF | Mesa | 128
Facility
128
AZ AVG
54
Rank
#69 / 521 |
94.1%
Facility
94.1%
AZ AVG
71.2
Rank
#9 / 55 | +32% | 3.74
Facility
3.74
AZ AVG
4.06
Rank
#34 / 59 | -51% | -8% | $0
Facility
$0
AZ AVG
$31.7k
Rank
#1 / 61 | 90
Facility
90
AZ AVG
82
Rank
#77 / 290 | 5
Facility
5
AZ AVG
23.2
Rank
#4 / 61 | 1.7
Facility
1.7
AZ AVG
3.8
Rank
#2 / 61 | - | 120 | B- |
27
Facility
27
AZ AVG
38
Rank
#514 / 775 | Terry Speth | $18.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$18.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
$15.3M
Rank
#14 / 58 | $10.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$10.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
$8.6M
Rank
#13 / 58 | 55.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
55.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
64.5%
Rank
#26 / 58 | 35103 | ||||
| Mission Palms Post Acute | NH SNF | Mesa | 160
Facility
160
AZ AVG
54
Rank
#31 / 521 |
86.9%
Facility
86.9%
AZ AVG
71.2
Rank
#18 / 55 | +22% | 3.61
Facility
3.61
AZ AVG
4.06
Rank
#38 / 59 | -30% | -11% | $0
Facility
$0
AZ AVG
$31.7k
Rank
#1 / 61 | 74
Facility
74
AZ AVG
82
Rank
#200 / 290 | 19
Facility
19
AZ AVG
23.2
Rank
#25 / 61 | 2.4
Facility
2.4
AZ AVG
3.8
Rank
#12 / 61 | - | 139 | - |
43
Facility
43
AZ AVG
38
Rank
#330 / 775 | Clayton Wagner | $20.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$20.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
$15.3M
Rank
#11 / 58 | $11.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$11.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
$8.6M
Rank
#12 / 58 | 55.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
55.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
64.5%
Rank
#29 / 58 | 35071 | ||||
| Advanced Health Care of Mesa | NH SNF | Mesa | 38
Facility
38
AZ AVG
54
Rank
#220 / 521 |
96.1%
Facility
96.1%
AZ AVG
71.2
Rank
#6 / 55 | +35% | 3.84
Facility
3.84
AZ AVG
4.06
Rank
#29 / 59 | +54% | -5% | $0
Facility
$0
AZ AVG
$31.7k
Rank
#1 / 61 | 83
Facility
83
AZ AVG
82
Rank
#120 / 290 | 6
Facility
6
AZ AVG
23.2
Rank
#7 / 61 | 2.0
Facility
2.0
AZ AVG
3.8
Rank
#6 / 61 | - | 37 | - |
38
Facility
38
AZ AVG
38
Rank
#385 / 775 | New Ahc Holdings, LLC | $8.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$8.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
$15.3M
Rank
#46 / 58 | $4.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$4.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
$8.6M
Rank
#52 / 58 | 53.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
53.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
64.5%
Rank
#33 / 58 | 35266 |
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Arizona
Red Mountain Mesa is located in Mesa, Arizona.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Arizona.
Frequently Asked Questions about Red Mountain Mesa
Is Red Mountain Mesa in a walkable area?
Red Mountain Mesa has a walk score of 2. Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
What is the license number of Red Mountain Mesa?
According to AZ state health department records, Red Mountain Mesa's license number is AL0783H.
How long has Red Mountain Mesa been in business?
Red Mountain Mesa has been operating for approximately 31 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
Are pets allowed at Red Mountain Mesa?
No, Red Mountain Mesa has a no-pet policy.
Who is the administrator of Red Mountain Mesa?
Anthony Zerilli is the administrator of Red Mountain Mesa.
How many beds does Red Mountain Mesa have?
Red Mountain Mesa has 10 beds.
Has Red Mountain Mesa had any deficiencies?
Red Mountain Mesa has had 8 reported deficiencies according to records from Arizona Department of Health Services (ADHS).
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Updated on
