Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Rhoda’s Assisted Living Home
Located in Avondale, Arizona, Rhoda’s Assisted Living Home is a reliable senior living community offering excellent assisted living and memory care services. The community is designed to create a warm, supportive home-like residence that enables residents to live life to its fullest with the support of a dedicated care team. Each resident receives personalized service and care, including companion services, personal care assistance, and skilled nursing care, ensuring most of their needs are met.
With most of the chores handled by the community, residents can devote their time to their enrichment and well-being. Meal preparation is also taken care of by the team, ensuring residents always eat good and right on time. Here, residents have the tools and support they need to spend their retirement years comfortably and vibrantly.
Community insights.
About this community
Rhoda’s Assisted Living Home is administered by Husnul K Bocchino.
Inspection History
In Arizona, the Department of Health Services, Bureau of Long Term Care Licensing performs regular onsite inspections and investigates complaints for all licensed residential and nursing facilities.
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Arizona state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
• Deficiencies per inspection (6% above) 2 Better Metrics better than Arizona average:
• Total deficiencies (27% below)
• Enforcement actions (100% below)
Deficiencies
| This Facility | AZ Average | vs. AZ Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
| 8 | 11 | This facility has 27% fewer total deficiencies than a typical Arizona nursing home (8 vs. AZ avg 11).↓ 27% better Rank #270 / 486 Total deficiencies — State benchmarked This home is ranked 270th out of 486 homes we track in Arizona for deficiencies. Shows this facility's deficiencies compared to the Arizona average among 486 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
| 2.7 | 2.55 | This facility has 6% more deficiencies per inspection than a typical Arizona nursing home (2.7 vs. AZ avg 2.55).↑ 6% worse Rank #326 / 486 Deficiencies per inspection — State benchmarked This home is ranked 326th out of 486 homes we track in Arizona for deficiencies per inspection. Shows this facility's deficiencies per inspection compared to the Arizona average among 486 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. |
|
Enforcement actions
| 0 | 0.9 | This facility has 100% fewer enforcement actions than a typical Arizona nursing home (0 vs. AZ avg 0.9).↓ 100% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | AZ Average | vs. AZ Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
| 3 | 5 | This facility has had 40% fewer total inspections than the Arizona average (3 vs. AZ avg 5). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 40% fewer |
Places of interest near Rhoda’s Assisted Living Home
3.3 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Avondale's city center to Rhoda’s Assisted Living Home's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Rhoda’s Assisted Living Home
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around the area
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the AZ Dept. of Health Services (ADHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Arizona average is: 64.5% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grandview Terrace Health & Rehabilitation Center | NH AL IL MC SNF | Sun City West | 72
Facility
72
AZ AVG
100
Rank
#49 / 80 |
84.4%
Facility
84.4%
AZ AVG
73.5%
Rank
#21 / 55 | +15% | 4.98
Facility
4.98
AZ AVG
4.06
Rank
#11 / 59 | +9% | +23% | $0
Facility
$0
AZ AVG
$31.7k
Rank
#1 / 61 | 12
Facility
12
AZ AVG
23.2
Rank
#17 / 61 | 1.7
Facility
1.7
AZ AVG
3.8
Rank
#2 / 61 | - | 61 | - |
42
Facility
42
AZ AVG
42
Rank
#41 / 84 | Sun Health Grandview Terrace | $11.8MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
$11.8MFiscal year ending 06/2024
AZ AVG
$15.3M
Rank
#34 / 58 | $7.0MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
$7.0MFiscal year ending 06/2024
AZ AVG
$8.6M
Rank
#30 / 58 | 59.3%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
59.3%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
AZ AVG
64.5%
Rank
#21 / 58 | 35265 | ||||
| Legacy Rehab & Care Center | NH MC RC SNF | Bullhead City | 120
Facility
120
AZ AVG
100
Rank
#25 / 80 |
38.3%
Facility
38.3%
AZ AVG
73.5%
Rank
#52 / 55 | -48% | 3.80
Facility
3.80
AZ AVG
4.06
Rank
#29 / 59 | -48% | -6% | $0
Facility
$0
AZ AVG
$31.7k
Rank
#1 / 61 | 4
Facility
4
AZ AVG
23.2
Rank
#7 / 61 | 1.3
Facility
1.3
AZ AVG
3.8
Rank
#6 / 61 | - | 46 | A+ | - | Silver Ridge Management Inc | $7.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$7.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
$15.3M
Rank
#49 / 58 | $4.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$4.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
$8.6M
Rank
#53 / 58 | 54.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
54.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
64.5%
Rank
#30 / 58 | 35097 |
Rank badges are statewide: each nursing home is ranked against every AZ nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 2 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Frequently Asked Questions about Rhoda’s Assisted Living Home
What neighborhood is Rhoda’s Assisted Living Home in?
Rhoda’s Assisted Living Home is in the Donatela neighborhood of Avondale.
Is Rhoda’s Assisted Living Home in a walkable area?
Rhoda’s Assisted Living Home has a walk score of 4. Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
What is the license number of Rhoda’s Assisted Living Home?
According to AZ state health department records, Rhoda’s Assisted Living Home's license number is AL9839H.
When does Rhoda’s Assisted Living Home's license expire?
According to AZ state health department records, Rhoda’s Assisted Living Home's license expires on October 31, 2026.
How long has Rhoda’s Assisted Living Home been in business?
Rhoda’s Assisted Living Home has been operating for approximately 10 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
Are pets allowed at Rhoda’s Assisted Living Home?
No, Rhoda’s Assisted Living Home has a no-pet policy.
Who is the administrator of Rhoda’s Assisted Living Home?
Husnul K Bocchino is the administrator of Rhoda’s Assisted Living Home.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance





