Primarily short stays
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Most new residents arrive under private pay (67% of admissions), and a typical private pay stay runs around 1 - 2 months.
A 124-bed nursing home in Rochester at 525 Beahan Road, Rochester Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing, focuses on short-term post-acute care and rehabilitation, with a typical stay of 84 days. Operator Michael Gestetner has configured the facility around four clinical programs: cardiac care, pain management, stroke care, and orthopedic rehabilitation. The center also offers respite care. Occupancy runs at 98%, the highest percentile locally, pointing to sustained demand.
Staffing for direct nursing is 3 hours 25 minutes per resident per day and trails the New York average by a small margin, and ranks in the middle tier statewide. This measure alone would not warrant concern, but the inspection and enforcement record paints a different operational picture. Since 2017, state regulators have conducted ten inspections and cited the facility for 29 violations, more than double the state average.
The most recent inspection in April 2024 found one deficiency involving parenteral fluid management. Six months earlier, in October 2023, inspectors identified 18 violations covering both clinical care and physical plant; ranging from activities of daily living assistance and medication labeling to electrical system maintenance, elevator safety, and building construction standards. Several were subsequently corrected.
More significantly, the facility carries eight enforcement actions on record, roughly five times the state average. These formal penalties indicate the state deemed violations serious enough to warrant intervention beyond standard citation. One critical-severity deficiency has been issued over the past five years. Federal penalties reached $9,000 in October 2023; no additional fines have been imposed in the two years since.
Resident and family complaints numbered 138 over nine years, 75% above the state baseline. Among these, 19 triggered formal complaint investigations. Two active lawsuits are currently proceeding: a negligence claim filed in 2026 and a medical malpractice case from 2021 (jury demand issued, discovery ongoing, next court date March 27, 2026). These cases remain unresolved.
On quality outcomes, the facility shows strength in preventing major falls, 0.0% incidence versus the state average of 3.0%, and maintains strong preventive care compliance for pneumococcal vaccination. However, long-stay resident mood outcomes are concerning: 27.6% report depressive symptoms, nearly 50% worse than state norms. Functional decline in self-care ability and walking capacity reflects the care challenges this population presents or the facility’s care management approach; both warrant direct discussion before admission.
Rochester Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing is oriented toward families seeking short-term post-acute rehabilitation in Rochester.
Rochester Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing is legally operated by Westgate Operations Associates, LLC (For Profit).
In New York, the Department of Health, Office of Aging and Long Term Care performs unannounced onsite inspections to monitor compliance with state and federal healthcare regulations.
This facility has 8 enforcement actions. 33% of New York nursing homes have zero, and the statewide average is 1.6.
Citations
| This Facility | NY Average | vs. NY Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total citations
| 29 | 21 | This facility has 38% more total citations than a typical New York nursing home (29 vs. NY avg 21).↑ 38% worse |
|
Health citations
| 25 | 20 | This facility has 25% more health citations than a typical New York nursing home (25 vs. NY avg 20).↑ 25% worse |
|
Life safety citations
| 4 | 4 | This facility has life safety citations in line with the New York average (4 vs. NY avg 4).— At avg |
|
Citations per inspection
| 2.9 | 2.3 | This facility has 26% more citations per inspection than a typical New York nursing home (2.9 vs. NY avg 2.3).↑ 26% worse |
Inspections
| This Facility | NY Average | vs. NY Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
| 10 | 9 | This facility has had 11% more total inspections than the New York average (10 vs. NY avg 9). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 11% more |
|
Inspections with citations
| 4 | 4 | This facility has inspections with citations in line with the New York average (4 vs. NY avg 4).— At avg |
|
Inspection citation rate
| 40% | 44% | This facility has 4 percentage points lower inspection citation rate than a typical New York nursing home (40% vs. NY avg 44%).↓ 4% better |
Complaints & Investigations
| This Facility | NY Average | vs. NY Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total complaints
| 138 | 79 | This facility has 75% more total complaints than a typical New York nursing home (138 vs. NY avg 79).↑ 75% worse |
|
Complaints per year
| 138 | 79 | This facility has 75% more complaints per year than a typical New York nursing home (138 vs. NY avg 79).↑ 75% worse |
|
Complaints per bed
| 1.14 | 0.50 | This facility has 128% more complaints per bed than a typical New York nursing home (1.14 vs. NY avg 0.5).↑ 128% worse |
|
Complaint investigations
| 19 | 15 | This facility has had 27% more complaint investigations than the New York average (19 vs. NY avg 15). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 27% more |
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
New York average 3.6
Last Health inspection on Jan 2025
New York average 18.5
New York average 5.05
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
16 of 25 citations resulted from standard inspections; 1 of 25 resulted from complaint investigations; and 8 of 25 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
New York average: 0.2
New York average: 0.2
How this facility protects residents through staff vaccination policies and immunization practices.
Percentage of facility employees vaccinated against influenza.
Summary of court-record activity tied to this facility, compiled from publicly available case dockets.
Source: State court e-filing records
Reporting period: October 1 – December 31, 2025 (Q4 2025). Source: CMS Payroll-Based Journal report.
Manages medical care and health needs.
Assists with medical care and medications.
Helps with daily care and mobility.
Total hours from contractors
4,085 contractor hours this quarter
| Certified Nursing Assistant | 74 | 0 | 74 | 22,203 | 92 | 100% | 8.6 |
| Licensed Practical Nurse | 30 | 0 | 30 | 11,222 | 92 | 100% | 8.8 |
| Registered Nurse | 11 | 0 | 11 | 2,491 | 92 | 100% | 8.3 |
| Other Dietary Services Staff | 4 | 0 | 4 | 1,673 | 92 | 100% | 7.7 |
| Respiratory Therapy Technician | 1 | 5 | 6 | 1,378 | 66 | 72% | 7.2 |
| Clinical Nurse Specialist | 5 | 0 | 5 | 1,075 | 72 | 78% | 6.5 |
| Nurse Practitioner | 4 | 0 | 4 | 932 | 70 | 76% | 9.1 |
| Speech Language Pathologist | 0 | 2 | 2 | 757 | 65 | 71% | 6.5 |
| Physical Therapy Assistant | 0 | 6 | 6 | 731 | 65 | 71% | 6.9 |
| Occupational Therapy Aide | 3 | 0 | 3 | 599 | 65 | 71% | 8 |
| Feeding Assistant | 1 | 0 | 1 | 496 | 62 | 67% | 8 |
| Administrator | 1 | 0 | 1 | 480 | 60 | 65% | 8 |
| Qualified Social Worker | 0 | 1 | 1 | 477 | 63 | 68% | 7.6 |
| Physical Therapy Aide | 0 | 1 | 1 | 455 | 62 | 67% | 7.3 |
| Other Social Services Staff | 1 | 0 | 1 | 448 | 56 | 61% | 8 |
| Dental Services Staff | 4 | 0 | 4 | 431 | 63 | 68% | 6.3 |
| Mental Health Service Worker | 1 | 0 | 1 | 408 | 51 | 55% | 8 |
| Qualified Activities Professional | 0 | 1 | 1 | 316 | 42 | 46% | 7.5 |
| Medical Director | 1 | 0 | 1 | 104 | 13 | 14% | 8 |
Includes penalties issued in 2023
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database (Data as of Jan 2026)
Penalties are imposed by CMS for violations of federal nursing home regulations.
1 penalty in the past 3 years
Oct 31, 2023 · $9K
Last updated: Jan 2026
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
26% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
67% of new residents, often for short stays.
8% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jan 2026)
Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Historical financial and operational data for Rochester Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing from 2011–2023, based on CMS SNF Cost Reports.
Key figures below are for fiscal year ending in 12/2023.
Based on CMS SNF Cost Report for fiscal year ending in 12/2023.
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Most new residents arrive under private pay (67% of admissions), and a typical private pay stay runs around 1 - 2 months.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
6.8 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Rochester's city center to Rochester Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Add your location
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the NY State Dept. of Health (NYSDOH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest to lowest based on our ranking methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
ADC (Adult Day Care):
Daytime supervision, health monitoring, and social activities for seniors who live at home.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The New York average is: 55.8% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edna Tina Wilson Living Center | NH HOS MC SNF | Rochester | 120
Facility
120
NY AVG
160
Rank
#405 / 736 |
98.3%
Facility
98.3%
NY AVG
90.6%
Rank
#46 / 392 | +8% | 4.67
Facility
4.67
NY AVG
3.58
Rank
#27 / 395 | -56% | +30% | $0
Facility
$0
NY AVG
$67.6k
Rank
#1 / 398 | 5
Facility
5
NY AVG
18.5
Rank
#15 / 397 | 1.7
Facility
1.7
NY AVG
5.1
Rank
#10 / 397 | - | 118 | - |
2
Facility
2
NY AVG
64
Rank
#1,142 / 1,150 | Sandra Loan | $12.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$12.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$29.2M
Rank
#312 / 383 | $11.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$11.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$15.4M
Rank
#216 / 383 | 85.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
85.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
55.8%
Rank
#16 / 382 | 335769 | ||||
| St. Ann’s Community | NH ADC AL HOS IL MC PC SNF | Rochester (East Irondequoit) | 376
Facility
376
NY AVG
160
Rank
#31 / 736 |
97.9%
Facility
97.9%
NY AVG
90.6%
Rank
#72 / 392 | +8% | 4.63
Facility
4.63
NY AVG
3.58
Rank
#32 / 395 | -33% | +29% | $55.5k
Facility
$55.5k
NY AVG
$67.6k
Rank
#356 / 398 | 12
Facility
12
NY AVG
18.5
Rank
#107 / 397 | 4.0
Facility
4.0
NY AVG
5.1
Rank
#123 / 397 | - | 368 | - |
37
Facility
37
NY AVG
64
Rank
#895 / 1,150 | Michelle Ashby | $56.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$56.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$29.2M
Rank
#34 / 383 | $51.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$51.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$15.4M
Rank
#13 / 383 | 90.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
90.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
55.8%
Rank
#12 / 382 | 335081 | ||||
| Friendly Home | NH HOS MC SNF | Rochester (City Of Rochester) | 200
Facility
200
NY AVG
160
Rank
#164 / 736 |
89.0%
Facility
89.0%
NY AVG
90.6%
Rank
#305 / 392 | -2% | 4.52
Facility
4.52
NY AVG
3.58
Rank
#40 / 395 | -89% | +26% | $0
Facility
$0
NY AVG
$67.6k
Rank
#1 / 398 | 14
Facility
14
NY AVG
18.5
Rank
#146 / 397 | 4.7
Facility
4.7
NY AVG
5.1
Rank
#189 / 397 | - | 178 | - |
17
Facility
17
NY AVG
64
Rank
#1,044 / 1,150 | Christine Johnson | $30.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$30.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$29.2M
Rank
#147 / 383 | $18.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$18.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$15.4M
Rank
#93 / 383 | 59.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
59.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
55.8%
Rank
#116 / 382 | 335476 | ||||
| Park Place Southwest | NH | Rochester | 120
Facility
120
NY AVG
160
Rank
#405 / 736 |
97.3%
Facility
97.3%
NY AVG
90.6%
Rank
#90 / 392 | +7% | 3.87
Facility
3.87
NY AVG
3.58
Rank
#85 / 395 | -38% | +8% | $12.9k
Facility
$12.9k
NY AVG
$67.6k
Rank
#324 / 398 | 11
Facility
11
NY AVG
18.5
Rank
#90 / 397 | 2.8
Facility
2.8
NY AVG
5.1
Rank
#52 / 397 | 1 | 117 | - |
75
Facility
75
NY AVG
64
Rank
#527 / 1,150 | Rachel Adonis | $14.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$14.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$29.2M
Rank
#302 / 383 | $11.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$11.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$15.4M
Rank
#212 / 383 | 79.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
79.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
55.8%
Rank
#24 / 382 | 335620 | ||||
| Rochester Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing | NH SNF | Rochester | 124
Facility
124
NY AVG
160
Rank
#393 / 736 |
98.4%
Facility
98.4%
NY AVG
90.6%
Rank
#44 / 392 | +9% | 3.47
Facility
3.47
NY AVG
3.58
Rank
#139 / 395 | -45% | -3% | $9.3k
Facility
$9.3k
NY AVG
$67.6k
Rank
#308 / 398 | 25
Facility
25
NY AVG
18.5
Rank
#314 / 397 | 6.3
Facility
6.3
NY AVG
5.1
Rank
#299 / 397 | 1 | 122 | - |
10
Facility
10
NY AVG
64
Rank
#1,084 / 1,150 | Michael Gestetner | $16.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$16.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$29.2M
Rank
#276 / 383 | $7.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$7.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$15.4M
Rank
#309 / 383 | 44.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
44.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
55.8%
Rank
#282 / 382 | 335556 |
Rochester Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing is located in Rochester, New York State.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in New York State.
Rochester Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing is legally operated by Westgate Operations Associates, LLC (For Profit).
Rochester Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing has a walk score of 10. Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
According to NY state health department records, Rochester Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing's license number is 2753302N.
Rochester Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing's occupancy is 98%.
No, Rochester Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing has a no-pet policy.
Rochester Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing is registered as a for-profit in NY.
Rochester Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing has 124 beds.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance