Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
64
52 employees · 12 contractors · 26 on an average day San Rafael Health and Rehabilitation
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · Ferron, UT
ALM Inspection Grade
C-
ALM's inspection grade is 70 / 100, a C- — 12 points below the Utah average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 70 / 100, a C- — 12 points below the Utah average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
San Rafael Health and Rehabilitation
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · Ferron, UT
ALM Inspection Grade
C-
ALM's inspection grade is 70 / 100, a C- — 12 points below the Utah average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 70 / 100, a C- — 12 points below the Utah average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
San Rafael Health and Rehabilitation accepts Medicaid, Medicare, and private pay.
Overview of San Rafael Health and Rehabilitation
San Rafael Health and Rehabilitation is a nursing home in Ferron, UT, providing skilled nursing care and rehabilitation services. Skilled nursing means licensed nurses are on site around the clock, while rehabilitation supports recovery and functional improvement within the facility. The community may suit someone who needs ongoing nursing oversight together with rehabilitation in one setting.
There are 51 beds here. That makes San Rafael a smaller community where residents and staff can get to know one another, which may suit someone who prefers a smaller setting. Family Councils give relatives a structured way to participate in discussions connected to community life.
Payment options include Medicaid, Medicare, and private pay. Medicaid can help when a resident’s savings may not cover a long stay, while Medicare generally applies to short term skilled care after a hospital stay rather than long term residence. Private pay means the resident or family funds care directly.
Total nurse staffing is 3h 50m per resident per day. This represents the daily hands on nursing time allocated per resident.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 16th out of 68 nursing homes we track in Utah for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 50m
This nursing home is ranked 16th out of 68 nursing homes we track in Utah for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 50mStandout metric: RN, weekends is +27% above Utah average
4 of 6 metrics below Utah average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 13 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
13 staff · 9.3-hour shifts
1h 29m
↑ 25% · UT 1h 11mThis facility: 1h 29m per resident per day, 25% above the Utah average of 1h 11m (among Utah facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 13 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
13 staff · 9.3-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 1 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
1 staff · 12.1-hour shifts
9m
↓ 70% · UT 31mThis facility: 9m per resident per day, 70% below the Utah average of 31m (among Utah facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 1 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
1 staff · 12.1-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 13 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
13 staff · 9-hour shifts
2h 12m
↓ 7% · UT 2h 22mThis facility: 2h 12m per resident per day, 7% below the Utah average of 2h 22m (among Utah facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 13 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
13 staff · 9-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 20m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 20m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
2m
↓ 74% · UT 7mThis facility: 2m per resident per day, 74% below the Utah average of 7m (among Utah facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
3h 2m
↓ 14% · UT 3h 31mThis facility: 3h 2m per resident per day, 14% below the Utah average of 3h 31m (among Utah facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
1h 3m
↑ 27% · UT 50mThis facility: 1h 3m per resident per day, 27% above the Utah average of 50m (among Utah facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 28m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 28m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
64
52 employees · 12 contractors · 26 on an average day
64 total staff / 39 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.64 : 1
↓ 19% · UT 2.03This facility: 1.64 staff per resident, 19% below the Utah average of 2.03 (among Utah facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
64 staff ÷ 39 residents
See full Utah ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.8 h
↓ 1% · UT 7.9 hThis facility: 7.8 h, 1% below the Utah average of 7.9 h (among Utah facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
18,659 staff hours this quarter
See full Utah ranking →96.2% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Utah average: 94.4% · Contractors this quarter: Mental Health Service Worker (4), Speech Language Pathologist (2), Occupational Therapy Aide (1), Physical Therapy Aide (1), Respiratory Therapy Technician (1), Physical Therapy Assistant (1), Dietitian (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
51
Rank #59 / 72Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 59th out of 72 nursing homes we track in Utah for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Utah facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
51
Rank #59 / 72Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 59th out of 72 nursing homes we track in Utah for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Utah facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Years of operating
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #2 / 63Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 2nd out of 63 nursing homes we track in Utah for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Utah facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #2 / 63Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 2nd out of 63 nursing homes we track in Utah for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Utah facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
45
years
Walk Score
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #67 / 81Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 67th out of 81 nursing homes we track in Utah for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Utah facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #67 / 81Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 67th out of 81 nursing homes we track in Utah for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Utah facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
26
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #31 / 58Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 31st out of 58 nursing homes we track in Utah for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Utah average, with its Statewide rank out of 58. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #31 / 58Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 31st out of 58 nursing homes we track in Utah for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Utah average, with its Statewide rank out of 58. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
67.5%
This home usually has availability
Based on 34.4 residents and 51 beds. Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents
Lower than the Utah average: 71.4%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
245
days
About This Community
Facility TypeNursing Care Facility
StatusRegulated
IssuanceMarch 15, 1981
CountyEmery
CMS Certification Number465085
Resident Council
Accept Medicaid
Physical TherapyListed as: In-house physical therapy
Occupational TherapyListed as: In-house occupational therapy
Speech TherapyListed as: In-house speech therapy
Wound CareCare for wounds such as pressure sores, surgical wounds, or ulcers, including assessment, dressing changes, and monitoring for infection.
Respite CareRespite care provides families and unpaid caregivers with short-term relief from caregiving duties. Care can range from a few hours to a few weeks.
Pets not allowed
Activities
Arts and Crafts
Cooking Groups
Birthday Celebrations
Bingo
Card Games
Current Events Discussion
Travel Videos
Movie Night
Intergenerational Programs
Music Therapy
Pet Therapy
Sensory Programming
Reminiscence Activities
Community Outings and Van Rides
Seasonal Events
Lds Services with Relief Society and Priesthood
Non-Denominational Services
Room Types
Private Room
Semi-Private / Shared Room
In-Room Features
Cable Tv In Each Room
Wireless Internet In Each Room
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
70 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
12 points below the Utah average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Concern
214 severity-weighted points (27 deficiencies) · 3× higher than the typical CMS-certified UT facility (median: 75)
Enforcement
Concern
2 enforcement actions · 2× more than the typical CMS-certified UT facility (median: 1) · $29,347 in fines
Persistence
Strong
29 days to fix issues · faster than the typical CMS-certified UT facility (median: 40)
Total health inspections
3
↓ 12% · UT 3.4This facility: 3, 12% below the UT average of 3.4 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
27
Rank #48 / 73Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 48th out of 73 nursing homes we track in Utah for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Utah State average, with a ranking across all 73 UT facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 1% · UT 27.3This facility: 27, 1% below the UT average of 27.3 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
9
Rank #53 / 73Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 53rd out of 73 nursing homes we track in Utah for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Utah mean across 73 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 15% · UT 7.83This facility: 9, 15% above the UT average of 7.83 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
27 of 27 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
3
↑ 400% · UT 0.6This facility: 3, 400% above the UT average of 0.6 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
3
↑ 15% · UT 2.6This facility: 3, 15% above the UT average of 2.6 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
20
↓ 17% · UT 24This facility: 20, 17% below the UT average of 24 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
1
↑ 900% · UT 0.1This facility: 1, 900% above the UT average of 0.1 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Nov 15, 2024 · 14 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Resident Assessment & Care Planning, 5 of 27 citations · 9 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Nov 15, 2024
14 citations
Abuse/Neglect critical citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect critical citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect critical citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 15, 2023
3 citations
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jun 17, 2021
10 citations
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 27 citations
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
5 deficiencies (19%)
Quality of Life & Care
5 deficiencies (19%)
Pharmacy Services
5 deficiencies (19%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
4 deficiencies (15%)
Resident Rights
2 deficiencies (7%)
Administration
2 deficiencies (7%)
Nursing & Physician Services
2 deficiencies (7%)
Infection Control
1 deficiency (4%)
Nutrition & Dietary
1 deficiency (4%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
19 of 27 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 8 of 27 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
2 penalties in the past 3 years
Latest: Nov 15, 2024 · $25,929 civil money penalty
Nov 15, 2024 · $25,929 civil money penalty
Feb 6, 2024 · $3,418 civil money penalty
Total fines
$29,347
↓ 33% · UT $44KThis facility: $29,347, 33% below the Utah average of $43,577. Average among the 51 Utah facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #55 / 74Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 55th out of 74 nursing homes we track in Utah for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Utah average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 74 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
2
↑ 24% · UT 1.61This facility: 2, 24% above the Utah average of 1.61. Average among the 51 Utah facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
UT avg 0.29Utah average: 0.29. Average among the 51 Utah facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Nov 15, 2024
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$25,929
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$25,929
Feb 6, 2024
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$3,418
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$3,418Fine amount comparison
This facility
$29,347
Utah average
$43,577
US average
$67,417
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Utah and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Utah average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
3
/ 5
Average
↓ 25% · UT 4.0This facility: 3.0, 25% below the UT average of 4.0 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
11.0
Score · lower is better
↑ 54% · UT 7.1This facility: 11.0, 54% above the UT average of 7.1 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
23.7
Score · lower is better
↑ 48% · UT 16.0This facility: 23.7, 48% above the UT average of 16.0 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 6 better, 5 worse, 2 near UT average
8 short-stay measures: 1 better, 2 worse, 2 near UT average, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
22.2%
↑ 97% · UT 11.3This facility: 22.2, 97% above the UT average of 11.3 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
22.2%
↑ 97% · UT 11.3This facility: 22.2, 97% above the UT average of 11.3 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
25.4%
↑ 68% · UT 15.1This facility: 25.4, 68% above the UT average of 15.1 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
25.4%
↑ 68% · UT 15.1This facility: 25.4, 68% above the UT average of 15.1 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
23.5%
↑ 9% · UT 21.5This facility: 23.5, 9% above the UT average of 21.5 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
23.5%
↑ 9% · UT 21.5This facility: 23.5, 9% above the UT average of 21.5 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.4%
↑ 88% · UT 1.8This facility: 3.4, 88% above the UT average of 1.8 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.4%
↑ 88% · UT 1.8This facility: 3.4, 88% above the UT average of 1.8 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.7%
↓ 33% · UT 2.5This facility: 1.7, 33% below the UT average of 2.5 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.7%
↓ 33% · UT 2.5This facility: 1.7, 33% below the UT average of 2.5 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.0%
↓ 24% · UT 3.9This facility: 3.0, 24% below the UT average of 3.9 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.0%
↓ 24% · UT 3.9This facility: 3.0, 24% below the UT average of 3.9 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.7%
↓ 21% · UT 3.4This facility: 2.7, 21% below the UT average of 3.4 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.7%
↓ 21% · UT 3.4This facility: 2.7, 21% below the UT average of 3.4 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
13.8%
↓ 17% · UT 16.5This facility: 13.8, 17% below the UT average of 16.5 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
13.8%
↓ 17% · UT 16.5This facility: 13.8, 17% below the UT average of 16.5 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
33.8%
↑ 138% · UT 14.2This facility: 33.8, 138% above the UT average of 14.2 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
33.8%
↑ 138% · UT 14.2This facility: 33.8, 138% above the UT average of 14.2 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 3% · UT 97.4This facility: 100.0, 3% above the UT average of 97.4 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 3% · UT 97.4This facility: 100.0, 3% above the UT average of 97.4 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.4%
↓ 4% · UT 98.0This facility: 94.4, 4% below the UT average of 98.0 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.4%
↓ 4% · UT 98.0This facility: 94.4, 4% below the UT average of 98.0 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.86
↓ 28% · UT 1.19This facility: 0.86, 28% below the UT average of 1.19 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.86
↓ 28% · UT 1.19This facility: 0.86, 28% below the UT average of 1.19 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.39
↓ 7% · UT 1.50This facility: 1.39, 7% below the UT average of 1.50 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.39
↓ 7% · UT 1.50This facility: 1.39, 7% below the UT average of 1.50 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
24.0%
↓ 55% · US 53.7This facility: 24.0, 55% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
24.0%
↓ 55% · US 53.7This facility: 24.0, 55% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
44.4%
↓ 12% · US 50.6This facility: 44.4, 12% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
44.4%
↓ 12% · US 50.6This facility: 44.4, 12% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.6%
↑ 76% · UT 0.9This facility: 1.6, 76% above the UT average of 0.9 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.6%
↑ 76% · UT 0.9This facility: 1.6, 76% above the UT average of 0.9 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
96.9%
↑ 3% · UT 93.8This facility: 96.9, 3% above the UT average of 93.8 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
96.9%
↑ 3% · UT 93.8This facility: 96.9, 3% above the UT average of 93.8 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
91.3%
≈ 0% · UT 91.0This facility: 91.3, level with the UT average of 91.0 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
91.3%
≈ 0% · UT 91.0This facility: 91.3, level with the UT average of 91.0 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
25.1%
↑ 44% · UT 17.4This facility: 25.1, 44% above the UT average of 17.4 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
25.1%
↑ 44% · UT 17.4This facility: 25.1, 44% above the UT average of 17.4 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
5.8%
↓ 51% · UT 11.8This facility: 5.8, 51% below the UT average of 11.8 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
5.8%
↓ 51% · UT 11.8This facility: 5.8, 51% below the UT average of 11.8 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
San Rafael Health and Rehabilitation’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 70 Utah nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Profitable on care
15.7% operating margin
+15.5 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 3 of the last 8 reported years. Net income $1.0M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Utah homes
43.4% payroll share of revenue
UT average 51.2%Rank #51 / 68Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 51st out of 68 nursing homes we track in Utah for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Utah average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.4M while revenue rose $1.7M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Utah homes.
Revenue & profit
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | UT median | Compared with UT homesRank in UT | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $6.1M | +$1.7M | Trend 20172024 | UT median $8.1M | Rank in UT Rank #47 / 70Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 47th out of 70 nursing homes we track in Utah for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Utah average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 33% of homes | Below UT median Higher net patient revenue than 33% of UT homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $5.1M | +$0.7M | Trend 20172024 | UT median — | Rank in UT Not ranked | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $1.0M | +$0.9M | Trend 20172024 | UT median — | Rank in UT Not ranked | Profit, growing Resident care made money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 15.7% | +15.5 pts | Trend 20172024 | UT median — | Rank in UT Not ranked | Healthy margin More than 5% of revenue is left after operating expenses. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $1.0M | +$0.8M | Trend — | UT median — | Rank in UT Not ranked | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Utah homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | UT median | Compared with UT homesRank in UT | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $2.6M | +$0.4M | Trend 20172024 | UT median $4.2M | Rank in UT Rank #56 / 70Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 56th out of 70 nursing homes we track in Utah for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Utah average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 20% of homes | Below UT median Higher payroll than 20% of UT homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 43.4% | −6.8 pts | Trend 20172024 | UT median 49.6% | Rank in UT Rank #51 / 68Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 51st out of 68 nursing homes we track in Utah for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Utah average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 25% of homes | 7.8 pts under UT average The UT average is 51.2% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · UT benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Utah payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin UT payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $1.9M | $2.7M | $2.8M | $3.1M | $3.4M | $3.8M | $4.4M | $6.1M |
| Operating expenses | $2.3M | $2.6M | $3.0M | $3.3M | $3.9M | $4.0M | $4.4M | $5.1M |
| Net patient income | −$0.4M | $0.1M | −$0.2M | −$0.2M | −$0.5M | −$0.1M | $0.0M | $1.0M |
| Operating margin | −22.5% | 4.2% | −8.4% | −5.9% | −15.4% | −3.9% | 0.2% | 15.7% |
| Net income | $0.1M | $0.1M | −$0.2M | $0.2M | −$0.3M | −$0.1M | $0.1M | $1.0M |
| Payroll costs | $1.2M | $1.3M | $1.4M | $1.6M | $1.7M | $2.0M | $2.2M | $2.6M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 62.4% | 47.2% | 48.6% | 51.0% | 50.1% | 53.2% | 50.2% | 43.4% |
| Beds | 55 | 51 | 51 | 51 | 51 | 51 | 51 | 51 |
| Gross revenue | $1.9M | $2.2M | $2.6M | $4.2M | $5.0M | $5.2M | $5.7M | $6.9M |
| Salaries | $0.9M | $1.0M | $1.0M | $1.2M | $1.4M | $1.7M | $1.8M | $2.2M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.3M | $0.3M | $0.3M | $0.4M | $0.3M | $0.3M | $0.4M | $0.5M |
| Contract labor | — | — | $0.3M | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other operating costs | $1.1M | $1.3M | $1.7M | $1.7M | $2.2M | $1.9M | $2.2M | $2.5M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $207 | $299 | $292 | $329 | $305 | $345 | $355 | $444 |
| Cost per day | $253 | $287 | $317 | $349 | $352 | $359 | $354 | $374 |
| Average length of stay | 128.6 days | 136.2 days | 179.5 days | 177.0 days | 167.3 days | 106.2 days | 197.7 days | 245.1 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Jun 2026
Arriving
70 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
45 · 64%
Medicaid
4 · 6%
Private pay & other
21 · 30%
Resident snapshot
39 residents · Jun 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
5 · 13%
Medicaid
22 · 56%
Private pay & other
12 · 31%
Leaving
56 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
34 · 61%
Medicaid
6 · 11%
Private pay & other
16 · 29%
Mostly short-term rehab stays
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Places of interest near San Rafael Health and Rehabilitation
0.0 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Ferron's city center to San Rafael Health and Rehabilitation's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to San Rafael Health and Rehabilitation
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around the area
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the UT Dept. of Health & Human Services (DHHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Utah average is: 51.2% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| William E. Christoffersen Salt Lake Veterans Home | NH MC RC SNF | Salt Lake City (University) | 81
Facility
81
UT AVG
94
Rank
#43 / 72 | A+ |
90.7%
Facility
90.7%
UT AVG
71.4%
Rank
#11 / 58 | +27% | 5.76
Facility
5.76
UT AVG
3.82
Rank
#4 / 68 | +32% | +51% | $8.3k
Facility
$8.3k
UT AVG
$43.9k
Rank
#38 / 74 | 12
Facility
12
UT AVG
27.3
Rank
#8 / 73 | 3.0
Facility
3.0
UT AVG
7.8
Rank
#3 / 73 | 1 | 74 | - |
39
Facility
39
UT AVG
52
Rank
#56 / 81 | Avalon Va Management LLC | $13.0MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$13.0MFiscal year ending 06/2025
UT AVG
$9.5M
Rank
#17 / 70 | $7.3MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$7.3MFiscal year ending 06/2025
UT AVG
$4.7M
Rank
#12 / 70 | 55.8%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
55.8%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
UT AVG
51.2%
Rank
#21 / 68 | 465150 | ||||
| Advanced Health Care of St George | NH SNF | Saint George | 100
Facility
100
UT AVG
94
Rank
#29 / 72 | A+ |
39.9%
Facility
39.9%
UT AVG
71.4%
Rank
#52 / 58 | -44% | 4.70
Facility
4.70
UT AVG
3.82
Rank
#10 / 68 | -16% | +23% | $0
Facility
$0
UT AVG
$43.9k
Rank
#1 / 74 | 8
Facility
8
UT AVG
27.3
Rank
#3 / 73 | 4.0
Facility
4.0
UT AVG
7.8
Rank
#10 / 73 | - | 40 | - |
26
Facility
26
UT AVG
52
Rank
#67 / 81 | Jason Swigert | $7.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
UT AVG
$9.5M
Rank
#40 / 70 | $3.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$3.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
UT AVG
$4.7M
Rank
#42 / 70 | 48.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
48.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
UT AVG
51.2%
Rank
#40 / 68 | 465190 | ||||
| Pointe Meadows Health and Rehabilitation | NH MC SNF | Lehi | 99
Facility
99
UT AVG
94
Rank
#33 / 72 | A- |
84.2%
Facility
84.2%
UT AVG
71.4%
Rank
#20 / 58 | +18% | 3.52
Facility
3.52
UT AVG
3.82
Rank
#23 / 68 | -6% | -8% | $0
Facility
$0
UT AVG
$43.9k
Rank
#1 / 74 | 22
Facility
22
UT AVG
27.3
Rank
#32 / 73 | 7.3
Facility
7.3
UT AVG
7.8
Rank
#40 / 73 | - | 83 | - |
70
Facility
70
UT AVG
52
Rank
#22 / 81 | Pointe Meadow Healthcare Inc | $13.2MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$13.2MFiscal year ending 06/2025
UT AVG
$9.5M
Rank
#15 / 70 | $7.5MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$7.5MFiscal year ending 06/2025
UT AVG
$4.7M
Rank
#9 / 70 | 56.7%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
56.7%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
UT AVG
51.2%
Rank
#19 / 68 | 465188 | ||||
| Pinnacle Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | NH MC SNF | North Price | 100
Facility
100
UT AVG
94
Rank
#29 / 72 | A- |
63.4%
Facility
63.4%
UT AVG
71.4%
Rank
#46 / 58 | -11% | 3.34
Facility
3.34
UT AVG
3.82
Rank
#37 / 68 | -10% | -12% | $0
Facility
$0
UT AVG
$43.9k
Rank
#1 / 74 | 15
Facility
15
UT AVG
27.3
Rank
#13 / 73 | 5.0
Facility
5.0
UT AVG
7.8
Rank
#21 / 73 | - | 63 | - |
71
Facility
71
UT AVG
52
Rank
#18 / 81 | Price Healthcare, Inc | $8.7MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$8.7MFiscal year ending 06/2025
UT AVG
$9.5M
Rank
#33 / 70 | $4.2MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$4.2MFiscal year ending 06/2025
UT AVG
$4.7M
Rank
#37 / 70 | 47.7%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
47.7%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
UT AVG
51.2%
Rank
#43 / 68 | 465098 | ||||
| San Rafael Health and Rehabilitation | NH SNF | Ferron | 51
Facility
51
UT AVG
94
Rank
#59 / 72 | C- |
67.5%
Facility
67.5%
UT AVG
71.4%
Rank
#31 / 58 | -5% | 3.84
Facility
3.84
UT AVG
3.82
Rank
#16 / 68 | +21% | 0% | $29.3k
Facility
$29.3k
UT AVG
$43.9k
Rank
#55 / 74 | 27
Facility
27
UT AVG
27.3
Rank
#48 / 73 | 9.0
Facility
9.0
UT AVG
7.8
Rank
#53 / 73 | 6 | 34 | - |
26
Facility
26
UT AVG
52
Rank
#67 / 81 | County Of Emery | $6.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$6.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
UT AVG
$9.5M
Rank
#47 / 70 | $2.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$2.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
UT AVG
$4.7M
Rank
#56 / 70 | 43.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
43.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
UT AVG
51.2%
Rank
#51 / 68 | 465085 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other UT nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Frequently Asked Questions about San Rafael Health and Rehabilitation
Is San Rafael Health and Rehabilitation in a walkable area?
San Rafael Health and Rehabilitation has a walk score of 26. Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
What is the occupancy rate at San Rafael Health and Rehabilitation?
San Rafael Health and Rehabilitation's occupancy is 67.5%.
How long has San Rafael Health and Rehabilitation been in business?
San Rafael Health and Rehabilitation has been operating for approximately 45 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
Are pets allowed at San Rafael Health and Rehabilitation?
No, San Rafael Health and Rehabilitation has a no-pet policy.
What is the best email address for San Rafael Health and Rehabilitation?
The team at San Rafael Health and Rehabilitation can be reached at administrator@sanrafaelhealth.com.
Is San Rafael Health and Rehabilitation a government-operated facility?
San Rafael Health and Rehabilitation is a government-operated nursing facility in UT.
What is the overall rating for San Rafael Health and Rehabilitation?
San Rafael Health and Rehabilitation received a 1-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Updated on
