The Inn on Villa Lane
The Inn on Villa Lane has only been open four years, but it’s already running near capacity. Ninety percent of its 86 beds are filled, 77 residents in total, which tells you something about local demand even before you look at anything else. It’s a nursing home in Napa, California, sitting at 3255 Villa Ln in a neighborhood that scores 61 on walkability. That’s moderately walkable: a few errands are doable on foot, the rest need a car.
Chancellor Health Care Of California XIV Inc runs the facility, and Dorla Licausi is the administrator on record. Respite care is available here too, which matters if a family needs a short-term stay covered rather than a permanent placement. Respite options are often the difference between a family reaching a breaking point and getting through a rough stretch.
On the regulatory side, state inspections at facilities like this one tend to center on medication management and staffing credentials, the same areas regulators look at across nursing homes generally, not something specific to this address.
What you’re left with is a young facility that’s already proven it can fill beds, staffed under named leadership, with respite care in its toolkit. For families in Napa weighing a nursing home with strong current occupancy and a straightforward operational picture, The Inn on Villa Lane gives a clear starting point.
Capacity and availability
About this community
Occupancy
The Inn on Villa Lane is legally operated by Chancellor Health Care Of California Xiv Inc, Et Al, and administered by Dorla Licausi.
Inspection History
In California, the Department of Social Services (for assisted living facilities) and the Department of Public Health (for nursing homes) conduct inspections to ensure resident safety and regulatory compliance.
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the California state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
• Serious citations (Type A) (100% above) 3 Better Metrics better than California average:
• Total citations (33% below)
• Moderate citations (Type B) (50% below)
• Citations per inspection (93% below)
Citations
| This Facility | CA Average | vs. CA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total citations
| 8 | 12 | This facility has 33% fewer total citations than a typical California nursing home (8 vs. CA avg 12).↓ 33% better |
|
Serious citations (Type A)
| 6 | 3 | This facility has 100% more serious citations (type a) than a typical California nursing home (6 vs. CA avg 3).↑ 100% worse Rank #1156 / 1433 Serious citations (Type A) — State benchmarked This home is ranked 1156th out of 1,433 homes we track in California for # of serious citations. Shows this facility's # of serious citations compared to the California average among 1433 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in California that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. |
|
Moderate citations (Type B)
| 2 | 4 | This facility has 50% fewer moderate citations (type b) than a typical California nursing home (2 vs. CA avg 4).↓ 50% better |
|
Citations per inspection
| 0.3 | 4 | This facility has 93% fewer citations per inspection than a typical California nursing home (0.3 vs. CA avg 4).↓ 93% better |
Inspections & Visits
| This Facility | CA Average | vs. CA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
| 31 | 16 | This facility has had 94% more total inspections than the California average (31 vs. CA avg 16). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 94% more |
|
Complaint visits
| 15 | 13 | This facility has had 15% more complaint visits than the California average (15 vs. CA avg 13). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 15% more Rank #1020 / 1387 Complaint visits — State benchmarked This home is ranked 1020th out of 1,387 homes we track in California for # of complaint visits. Shows this facility's # of complaint visits compared to the California average among 1387 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in California that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. |
|
Other visits
| 13 | 7 | This facility has had 86% more other visits than the California average (13 vs. CA avg 7). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 86% more |
|
Official inspections
| 3 | 4 | This facility has had 25% fewer official inspections than the California average (3 vs. CA avg 4). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 25% fewer |
|
Complaint investigations
| 10 | 10 | This facility has complaint investigations in line with the California average (10 vs. CA avg 10).— At avg |
Places of interest near The Inn on Villa Lane
1.8 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Napa's city center to The Inn on Villa Lane's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to The Inn on Villa Lane
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around the area
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the CA Dept. of Social Services (CDSS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest to lowest based on our ranking methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RESC (Residential Care):
Personal care and daily-living support in a smaller, more intimate residential setting.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
A composite 0–100 score combining this facility's inspections, citations, complaints, and enforcement actions relative to the state average. See the benchmark below for the typical score in this state; higher is better.
This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine score.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The California average is: 61.2% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vi at Palo Alto | NH AL IL MC SNF | Palo Alto | 876
Facility
876
CA AVG
103
Rank
#1 / 1,645 |
73.1%
Facility
73.1%
CA AVG
75.9
Rank
#852 / 1,452 | -4% | 5.53
Facility
5.53
CA AVG
4.22
Rank
#16 / 288 | +28% | +31% | $0
Facility
$0
CA AVG
$56.5k
Rank
#1 / 293 | 90
Facility
90
CA AVG
81
Rank
#462 / 1,474 | 18
Facility
18
CA AVG
50.2
Rank
#27 / 290 | 3.0
Facility
3.0
CA AVG
4.6
Rank
#53 / 290 | 1 | 640 | - |
80
Facility
80
CA AVG
59
Rank
#416 / 2,057 | Cary Maslow | $15.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$15.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
$15.7M
Rank
#116 / 259 | $10.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$10.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
$9.0M
Rank
#73 / 259 | 70.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
70.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
61.2%
Rank
#32 / 259 | 555835 | ||||
| Canterbury Woods | NH AL IL SNF | Pacific Grove | 190
Facility
190
CA AVG
103
Rank
#179 / 1,645 |
72.6%
Facility
72.6%
CA AVG
75.9
Rank
#868 / 1,452 | -4% | 6.10
Facility
6.10
CA AVG
4.22
Rank
#7 / 288 | +10% | +44% | $0
Facility
$0
CA AVG
$56.5k
Rank
#1 / 293 | 91
Facility
91
CA AVG
81
Rank
#409 / 1,474 | 26
Facility
26
CA AVG
50.2
Rank
#71 / 290 | 8.7
Facility
8.7
CA AVG
4.6
Rank
#281 / 290 | - | 138 | A+ |
81
Facility
81
CA AVG
59
Rank
#383 / 2,057 | Shaida Behnam | $3.2MFiscal year ending 03/2024
Facility
$3.2MFiscal year ending 03/2024
CA AVG
$15.7M
Rank
#258 / 259 | $5.7MFiscal year ending 03/2024
Facility
$5.7MFiscal year ending 03/2024
CA AVG
$9.0M
Rank
#198 / 259 | 176.7%Fiscal year ending 03/2024
Facility
176.7%Fiscal year ending 03/2024
CA AVG
61.2%
Rank
#5 / 259 | 55303 | ||||
| Webster House | NH AL IL SNF | Palo Alto (Crescent Park) | 54
Facility
54
CA AVG
103
Rank
#1,115 / 1,645 |
90.7%
Facility
90.7%
CA AVG
75.9
Rank
#320 / 1,452 | +20% | 5.52
Facility
5.52
CA AVG
4.22
Rank
#16 / 288 | +21% | +31% | $0
Facility
$0
CA AVG
$56.5k
Rank
#1 / 293 | 94
Facility
94
CA AVG
81
Rank
#213 / 1,474 | 23
Facility
23
CA AVG
50.2
Rank
#52 / 290 | 5.8
Facility
5.8
CA AVG
4.6
Rank
#238 / 290 | - | 49 | - |
90
Facility
90
CA AVG
59
Rank
#171 / 2,057 | Elvyra Abare | $10.2MFiscal year ending 03/2024
Facility
$10.2MFiscal year ending 03/2024
CA AVG
$15.7M
Rank
#197 / 259 | $7.8MFiscal year ending 03/2024
Facility
$7.8MFiscal year ending 03/2024
CA AVG
$9.0M
Rank
#144 / 259 | 76.2%Fiscal year ending 03/2024
Facility
76.2%Fiscal year ending 03/2024
CA AVG
61.2%
Rank
#22 / 259 | 555156 | ||||
| The Vineyards – California Armenian Home | NH AL IL MC RESC SNF | Fresno (Roosevelt) | 412
Facility
412
CA AVG
103
Rank
#27 / 1,645 |
54.1%
Facility
54.1%
CA AVG
75.9
Rank
#1,266 / 1,452 | -29% | 4.61
Facility
4.61
CA AVG
4.22
Rank
#71 / 288 | +6% | +9% | $0
Facility
$0
CA AVG
$56.5k
Rank
#1 / 293 | 91
Facility
91
CA AVG
81
Rank
#409 / 1,474 | 37
Facility
37
CA AVG
50.2
Rank
#128 / 290 | 6.2
Facility
6.2
CA AVG
4.6
Rank
#247 / 290 | 1 | 223 | - |
24
Facility
24
CA AVG
59
Rank
#1,796 / 2,057 | Lucy Grayson | $13.8MFiscal year ending 05/2024
Facility
$13.8MFiscal year ending 05/2024
CA AVG
$15.7M
Rank
#135 / 259 | $9.6MFiscal year ending 05/2024
Facility
$9.6MFiscal year ending 05/2024
CA AVG
$9.0M
Rank
#94 / 259 | 69.8%Fiscal year ending 05/2024
Facility
69.8%Fiscal year ending 05/2024
CA AVG
61.2%
Rank
#34 / 259 | 55955 |
Frequently Asked Questions about The Inn on Villa Lane
Who is the owner of The Inn on Villa Lane?
The Inn on Villa Lane is legally operated by Chancellor Health Care Of California Xiv Inc, Et Al, and administered by Dorla Licausi.
Is The Inn on Villa Lane in a walkable area?
The Inn on Villa Lane has a walk score of 61. Moderately walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
What is the occupancy rate at The Inn on Villa Lane?
The Inn on Villa Lane's occupancy is 90%.
How long has The Inn on Villa Lane been in business?
The Inn on Villa Lane has been operating for approximately 4 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
Are pets allowed at The Inn on Villa Lane?
No, The Inn on Villa Lane has a no-pet policy.
Who is the administrator of The Inn on Villa Lane?
Dorla Licausi is the administrator of The Inn on Villa Lane.
How many beds does The Inn on Villa Lane have?
The Inn on Villa Lane has 86 beds.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance





