We arrange tours, appointments, and even moving support so you don’t have to
The Overall CMS Rating is scored from 1 to 5 stars and combines results from health inspections, staffing levels, and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
The Overall CMS Rating is scored from 1 to 5 stars and combines results from health inspections, staffing levels, and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Exceptional care, high-class amenities, and worthwhile activities are just some of the reasons why The Inn on Villa Lane is the ideal choice for assisted living and memory care. Nestled in a picturesque setting, The Inn provides a variety of individualized services and amenities to improve the quality of life for its inhabitants. Residents enjoy the large, comfortable individual rooms, cleverly designed common areas for gathering, and beautifully landscaped outdoor areas to enjoy privacy and freedom.
A highly skilled and caring team is on hand around-the-clock to provide tailored care plans that are specific to the needs of each patient. Daily activities and enriching programs encourage social engagement, mental stimulation, and physical well-being. On-site chefs provide wholesome meals that take dietary preferences and limits into account. If you’re looking for a place to spend your golden years, The Inn on Villa Lane is a warm and inviting assisted living community created to meet the unique needs of seniors in a tranquil and caring environment.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Daily nursing hours per resident by staff type, reported to CMS. Higher is generally better — compare this facility to state and national averages to see where staffing stands.
This home is ranked 203rd out of 346 homes in California. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
| Staff type | Hours / Day / Resident | vs state avg |
|---|---|---|
|
Weekend Total Nursing
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
| 3h 19m per day |
Higher than the California average: 72.8%The Inn on Villa Lane is legally operated by Chancellor Health Care Of California Xiv Inc,et Al, and administrated by Dorla Licausi.
In California, the Department of Social Services (for assisted living facilities) and the Department of Public Health (for nursing homes) conduct inspections to ensure resident safety and regulatory compliance.
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the California state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Citations
| This Facility | CA Average | vs. CA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total citations
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 8 | 10 | This facility has 20% fewer total citations than a typical California nursing home (8 vs. CA avg 10).↓ 20% better |
|
Serious citations (Type A)
Violations that pose an immediate risk to resident health or safety. Type A citations are the most serious and typically require prompt corrective action.
| 6 | 3 | This facility has 100% more serious citations (type a) than a typical California nursing home (6 vs. CA avg 3).↑ 100% worse |
|
Moderate citations (Type B)
Violations that do not pose an immediate risk but still represent a departure from required care or operational standards.
| 2 | 4 | This facility has 50% fewer moderate citations (type b) than a typical California nursing home (2 vs. CA avg 4).↓ 50% better |
|
Citations per year
Average citations per year since 2022.
| 2 | 2.5 | This facility has 20% fewer citations per year than a typical California nursing home (2 vs. CA avg 2.5).↓ 20% better |
|
Citations per inspection
Average citations per inspection.
| 0.3 | 3.3 | This facility has 91% fewer citations per inspection than a typical California nursing home (0.3 vs. CA avg 3.3).↓ 91% better |
Inspections & Visits
| This Facility | CA Average | vs. CA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total visits
Combined count of complaint visits, other regulatory visits, and official scheduled inspections.
| 29 | 16 | This facility has 81% more total visits than a typical California nursing home (29 vs. CA avg 16).↑ 81% worse |
|
Complaint visits
On-site visits triggered by formal complaints filed by residents, families, or staff.
| 13 | 13 | This facility has complaint visits in line with the California average (13 vs. CA avg 13).— At avg |
|
Other visits
Regulatory visits that are neither routine inspections nor complaint investigations — administrative check-ins, follow-up reviews, licensing-related visits.
| 13 | 7 | This facility has 86% more other visits than a typical California nursing home (13 vs. CA avg 7).↑ 86% worse |
|
Official inspections
Routine, scheduled inspections conducted by state regulators to evaluate whether the facility meets federal and state standards.
| 3 | 4 | This facility has 25% fewer official inspections than a typical California nursing home (3 vs. CA avg 4).↓ 25% better |
|
Complaint investigations
On-site investigations triggered by complaints filed with California regulators.
| 10 | 10 | This facility has complaint investigations in line with the California average (10 vs. CA avg 10).— At avg |
An editor-reviewed summary of the themes and findings across this facility's recent inspection reports.
This facility’s inspection record is mixed, with repeated medication errors and supervision issues but some periods of compliance. The most recent inspection on October 28, 2025, cited one deficiency for insufficient supervision leading to a resident eloping, posing an immediate health and safety risk. Previous citations include multiple medication errors resulting in two $250 fines in 2024 and 2023, substantiated complaints about resident intimidation in 2023, and several unsubstantiated allegations.
Read the full inspection reports for this facility, including detailed findings and corrective actions.
Show Inspection ReportsCalifornia average 12.5
Last Health inspection on Jul 2025
California average 50.2
California average 4.65
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
35 of 66 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 31 of 66 resulted from complaint investigations.
100% better than California averageCalifornia average: 0.4
400% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 1
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Reporting period: October 1 – December 31, 2025 (Q4 2025). Source: CMS Payroll-Based Journal report.
1182440% better than California average
0% compared with California average
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Manages medical care and health needs.
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
7.6 hoursNo contractors work on this role.
Assists with medical care and medications.
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
8.1 hoursNo contractors work on this role.
Helps with daily care and mobility.
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
7.8 hoursNo contractors work on this role.
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Total hours from contractors
40 contractor hours this quarter
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
| Certified Nursing Assistant | 63 | 0 | 63 | 24,140 | 92 | 100% | 7.8 |
| Licensed Practical Nurse | 36 | 0 | 36 | 12,819 | 92 | 100% | 8.1 |
| Registered Nurse | 12 | 0 | 12 | 5,213 | 92 | 100% | 7.6 |
| RN Director of Nursing | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1,522 | 85 | 92% | 7.5 |
| Respiratory Therapy Technician | 10 | 1 | 11 | 1,518 | 88 | 96% | 6.6 |
| Dental Services Staff | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1,394 | 68 | 74% | 7.7 |
| Other Dietary Services Staff | 4 | 0 | 4 | 1,304 | 88 | 96% | 7.1 |
| Speech Language Pathologist | 6 | 0 | 6 | 1,169 | 78 | 85% | 7 |
| Physical Therapy Assistant | 3 | 0 | 3 | 819 | 69 | 75% | 6.8 |
| Physical Therapy Aide | 3 | 0 | 3 | 732 | 84 | 91% | 6.4 |
| Nurse Practitioner | 1 | 0 | 1 | 512 | 64 | 70% | 8 |
| Dietitian | 1 | 0 | 1 | 510 | 65 | 71% | 7.8 |
| Administrator | 1 | 0 | 1 | 256 | 64 | 70% | 4 |
| Qualified Social Worker | 1 | 0 | 1 | 204 | 60 | 65% | 3.4 |
| Clinical Nurse Specialist | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1% | 4 |
Includes penalties issued in 2023
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database (Data as of Jan 2026)
45% lower than California averageCalifornia average: $55K
58% fewer fines than California averageCalifornia average: 2.4
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
100% fewer payment denials than California averageCalifornia average: 0.5
Penalties are imposed by CMS for violations of federal nursing home regulations.
1 penalty in the past 3 years
Sep 13, 2023 · $30K
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
Sep 13, 2023Last updated: Jan 2026
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
A composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and activities of daily living decline.
5.1
24% better than California averageCalifornia average: 6.6
A composite score based on activities of daily living decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence.
9.0
20% better than California averageCalifornia average: 11.3
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.9%
56% better than California averageCalifornia average: 11.1%
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
11.2%
7% better than California averageCalifornia average: 12.0%
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
11.1%
In line with California averageCalifornia average: 11.3%
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.8%
52% better than California averageCalifornia average: 1.7%
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.8%
In line with California averageCalifornia average: 5.0%
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.5%
56% better than California averageCalifornia average: 1.2%
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.7%
12% better than California averageCalifornia average: 4.2%
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.3%
22% better than California averageCalifornia average: 6.7%
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
8.2%
18% better than California averageCalifornia average: 10.1%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.7%
In line with California averageCalifornia average: 98.5%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
In line with California averageCalifornia average: 98.2%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.1%
6% better than California averageCalifornia average: 94.0%
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.1%
26% better than California averageCalifornia average: 1.5%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.4%
6% better than California averageCalifornia average: 93.2%
Quality measures are calculated from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. For most measures, lower percentages indicate better care quality.
32% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
67% of new residents, often for short stays.
1% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jan 2026)
Total residents
126Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Historical financial and operational data for The Inn on Villa Lane based on CMS SNF Cost Reports.
The portion of the home's budget spent on staff, including nurses, caregivers, and other employees who support care and operations.
Rank #79 / 347Payroll — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 79th out of 347 homes in California. Shows total annual staff payroll benchmarked to the California average. Higher payroll investment relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on cheaper contract labor.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
All remaining costs needed to run the home, such as food, utilities, building maintenance, supplies and administrative expenses.
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
1.8 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Napa's city center to The Inn on Villa Lane's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 0.13 miles to nearest hospital (Napa Valley Vintners Community Health Center)
Add your location
The Inn on Villa Lane is located in Napa, California.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in California.
The legal owner and operator of The Inn on Villa Lane is Chancellor Health Care Of California Xiv Inc,Et Al.
The Inn on Villa Lane has a walk score of 61. Moderately walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
The Inn on Villa Lane's occupancy is 90%.
Dorla Licausi is the administrator of The Inn on Villa Lane.
The Inn on Villa Lane has 86 beds.
The Inn on Villa Lane has had 8 recently reported deficiencies.
(707) 252-3333 will put you in contact with the team at The Inn on Villa Lane.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Thank you for your interest!
Our team will be in touch shortly to help with next steps.
