Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
219
90 employees · 129 contractors · 45 on an average day The Oaks of Orangeburg
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Home Care & Independent Living · Orangeburg, SC
ALM Inspection Grade
D
ALM's inspection grade is 65 / 100, a D — 16 points below the South Carolina average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 65 / 100, a D — 16 points below the South Carolina average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
The Oaks of Orangeburg
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Home Care & Independent Living · Orangeburg, SC
ALM Inspection Grade
D
ALM's inspection grade is 65 / 100, a D — 16 points below the South Carolina average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 65 / 100, a D — 16 points below the South Carolina average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
The Oaks of Orangeburg accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
The license at The Oaks of Orangeburg in Orangeburg, SC, is for nursing home care, assisted living, independent living, and home care. Under nursing home care, licensed nursing is what the designation requires the community to provide. In assisted living, bathing, medication, and dressing, along with other daily tasks, are helped with by staff, while the apartment remains the resident’s.
Independent living keeps the private space and drops the daily care. Home care goes out to the address a person already lives at, rather than requiring someone to move in to receive care.
The daily nursing time figure here is 3 hours and 12 minutes per resident, averaged out over all the 122 beds. The housing comes as suites, and a pet may move in with a resident.
Payment is accepted via private pay, Medicaid, and Medicare.
With four care levels licensed together, a family that anticipates needing more care in the future but is unable to predict when it will be needed has somewhere to start here.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 105th out of 118 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 12m
This nursing home is ranked 105th out of 118 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 12mStandout metric: LPN / LVN is +7% above South Carolina average
5 of 6 metrics below South Carolina average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 9 total: 6 of the facility's own employees and 3 agency contractors.
9 staff · 9.1-hour shifts
14m
↓ 65% · SC 40mThis facility: 14m per resident per day, 65% below the South Carolina average of 40m (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 9 total: 6 of the facility's own employees and 3 agency contractors.
9 staff · 9.1-hour shiftsUS average: 42m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 42m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 67 total: 24 of the facility's own employees and 43 agency contractors.
67 staff · 9.7-hour shifts
1h 10m
↑ 7% · SC 1h 5mThis facility: 1h 10m per resident per day, 7% above the South Carolina average of 1h 5m (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 67 total: 24 of the facility's own employees and 43 agency contractors.
67 staff · 9.7-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 123 total: 42 of the facility's own employees and 81 agency contractors.
123 staff · 9.5-hour shifts
1h 49m
↓ 24% · SC 2h 23mThis facility: 1h 49m per resident per day, 24% below the South Carolina average of 2h 23m (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 123 total: 42 of the facility's own employees and 81 agency contractors.
123 staff · 9.5-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 26m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
1m
↓ 89% · SC 5mThis facility: 1m per resident per day, 89% below the South Carolina average of 5m (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
2h 51m
↓ 20% · SC 3h 34mThis facility: 2h 51m per resident per day, 20% below the South Carolina average of 3h 34m (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 32m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 32m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
7m
↓ 73% · SC 24mThis facility: 7m per resident per day, 73% below the South Carolina average of 24m (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
219
90 employees · 129 contractors · 45 on an average day
219 total staff / 118 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.86 : 1
↑ 5% · SC 1.77This facility: 1.86 staff per resident, 5% above the South Carolina average of 1.77 (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
219 staff ÷ 118 residents
See full South Carolina ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
9 h
↑ 14% · SC 7.9 hThis facility: 9 h, 14% above the South Carolina average of 7.9 h (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
36,896 staff hours this quarter
See full South Carolina ranking →87.7% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
South Carolina average: 89% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (81), Licensed Practical Nurse (43), Registered Nurse (3), Medical Director (2)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
122
Rank #51 / 133Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 51st out of 133 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other South Carolina facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
122
Rank #51 / 133Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 51st out of 133 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other South Carolina facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
Occupancy rate
Occupancy higher than 95% suggests steady demand, but availability may be limited.
Rank #11 / 87Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 11th out of 87 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the South Carolina average, with its Statewide rank out of 87. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy higher than 95% suggests steady demand, but availability may be limited.
Rank #11 / 87Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 11th out of 87 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the South Carolina average, with its Statewide rank out of 87. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
95.7%
This home is often near full
Based on residents per day and 122 beds.
Higher than the South Carolina average: 89.7%
Residents per day (avg)
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
117
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
85
days
BBB Rating
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
A+
Not Accredited
How BBB ratings workAbout This Community
Resident Council
Total Employees
351
Full-Time Employees
351
Transportation
Pets Allowed
Minimum Age55 Years Old
Building Type3-story
Room Types
Suite
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
65 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
16 points below the South Carolina average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Concern
71 severity-weighted points (21 deficiencies) · 68% higher than the typical CMS-certified SC facility (median: 42)
Enforcement
Concern
$98,607 in fines · 12 enforcement actions
Persistence
Concern
31 days to fix issues · slower than the typical CMS-certified SC facility (median: 27)
Total health inspections
6
↑ 62% · SC 3.7This facility: 6, 62% above the South Carolina average of 3.7 (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
21
Rank #100 / 116Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 100th out of 116 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the South Carolina State average, with a ranking across all 116 SC facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 65% · SC 12.7This facility: 21, 65% above the South Carolina average of 12.7 (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
3.5
Rank #66 / 116Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 66th out of 116 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the South Carolina mean across 116 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 3% · SC 3.4This facility: 3.5, 3% above the South Carolina average of 3.4 (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
21 of 21 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
1
↑ 25% · SC 0.8This facility: 1, 25% above the South Carolina average of 0.8 (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · SC 0.3This facility: 0, 100% below the South Carolina average of 0.3 (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
20
↑ 72% · SC 11.6This facility: 20, 72% above the South Carolina average of 11.6 (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · SC 0.1This facility: 0, 100% below the South Carolina average of 0.1 (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Jan 13, 2026 · 8 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 6 of 21 citations · 7 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Jan 13, 2026
8 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jun 24, 2025
1 citation
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 10, 2025
2 citations
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 05, 2024
5 citations
Quality of Care critical citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jun 14, 2024
2 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Oct 07, 2022
3 citations
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 21 citations
Quality of Life & Care
6 deficiencies (29%)
Resident Rights
4 deficiencies (19%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
4 deficiencies (19%)
Pharmacy Services
3 deficiencies (14%)
Nutrition & Dietary
2 deficiencies (10%)
Infection Control
1 deficiency (5%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
1 deficiency (5%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
15 of 21 citations resulted from standard inspections; 5 of 21 resulted from complaint investigations; and 1 of 21 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
11 penalties in the past 3 years
Latest: Jan 13, 2026 · $6,162 civil money penalty
Jan 13, 2026 · $6,162 civil money penalty
Nov 5, 2024 · $13,627 civil money penalty
Feb 20, 2024 · $4,938 civil money penalty
Feb 12, 2024 · $4,938 civil money penalty
Jan 22, 2024 · $14,814 civil money penalty
Jan 8, 2024 · $4,938 civil money penalty
Jan 2, 2024 · $4,587 civil money penalty
Dec 11, 2023 · $13,762 civil money penalty
Nov 20, 2023 · $4,587 civil money penalty
Nov 13, 2023 · $4,587 civil money penalty
Oct 23, 2023 · $13,762 civil money penalty
Total fines
$90,702
↑ 222% · SC $28KThis facility: $90,702, 222% above the South Carolina average of $28,139. Average among the 98 South Carolina facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #118 / 119Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 118th out of 119 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the South Carolina average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 119 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
11
SC avg 2.03South Carolina average: 2.03. Average among the 98 South Carolina facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
SC avg 0.1South Carolina average: 0.1. Average among the 98 South Carolina facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Jan 13, 2026
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$6,162
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$6,162
Nov 5, 2024
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$13,627
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$13,627
Feb 20, 2024
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,938
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,938
Feb 12, 2024
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,938
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,938
Jan 22, 2024
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$14,814
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$14,814
Jan 8, 2024
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,938
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,938
Jan 2, 2024
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,587
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,587
Dec 11, 2023
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$13,762
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$13,762
Nov 20, 2023
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,587
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,587
Nov 13, 2023
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,587
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,587
Oct 23, 2023
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$13,762
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$13,762Fine amount comparison
This facility
$90,702
South Carolina average
$28,139
US average
$66,281
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. South Carolina and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the South Carolina average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
3
/ 5
Average
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
5.4
Score · lower is better
↓ 28% · SC 7.4This facility: 5.4, 28% below the SC average of 7.4 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
6.0
Score · lower is better
↓ 55% · SC 13.5This facility: 6.0, 55% below the SC average of 13.5 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 6 better, 4 worse, 1 near SC average
3 short-stay measures: 1 better, 2 worse
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7.1%
↓ 39% · SC 11.6This facility: 7.1, 39% below the SC average of 11.6 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7.1%
↓ 39% · SC 11.6This facility: 7.1, 39% below the SC average of 11.6 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
5.6%
↓ 53% · SC 11.8This facility: 5.6, 53% below the SC average of 11.8 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
5.6%
↓ 53% · SC 11.8This facility: 5.6, 53% below the SC average of 11.8 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
5.4%
↓ 67% · SC 16.2This facility: 5.4, 67% below the SC average of 16.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
5.4%
↓ 67% · SC 16.2This facility: 5.4, 67% below the SC average of 16.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.3%
↓ 79% · SC 1.2This facility: 0.3, 79% below the SC average of 1.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.3%
↓ 79% · SC 1.2This facility: 0.3, 79% below the SC average of 1.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.3%
↓ 29% · SC 3.2This facility: 2.3, 29% below the SC average of 3.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.3%
↓ 29% · SC 3.2This facility: 2.3, 29% below the SC average of 3.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.1%
↑ 3% · SC 4.9This facility: 5.1, 3% above the SC average of 4.9 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.1%
↑ 3% · SC 4.9This facility: 5.1, 3% above the SC average of 4.9 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.9%
↑ 13% · SC 6.1This facility: 6.9, 13% above the SC average of 6.1 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.9%
↑ 13% · SC 6.1This facility: 6.9, 13% above the SC average of 6.1 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.8%
↓ 75% · SC 3.2This facility: 0.8, 75% below the SC average of 3.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.8%
↓ 75% · SC 3.2This facility: 0.8, 75% below the SC average of 3.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
19.2%
↑ 24% · SC 15.4This facility: 19.2, 24% above the SC average of 15.4 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
19.2%
↑ 24% · SC 15.4This facility: 19.2, 24% above the SC average of 15.4 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
21.1%
↓ 77% · SC 91.8This facility: 21.1, 77% below the SC average of 91.8 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
21.1%
↓ 77% · SC 91.8This facility: 21.1, 77% below the SC average of 91.8 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
60.6%
↓ 35% · SC 92.5This facility: 60.6, 35% below the SC average of 92.5 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
60.6%
↓ 35% · SC 92.5This facility: 60.6, 35% below the SC average of 92.5 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 3 measures
Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.4%
↓ 70% · SC 1.4This facility: 0.4, 70% below the SC average of 1.4 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.4%
↓ 70% · SC 1.4This facility: 0.4, 70% below the SC average of 1.4 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
13.5%
↓ 84% · SC 81.9This facility: 13.5, 84% below the SC average of 81.9 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
13.5%
↓ 84% · SC 81.9This facility: 13.5, 84% below the SC average of 81.9 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
10.8%
↓ 86% · SC 79.0This facility: 10.8, 86% below the SC average of 79.0 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
10.8%
↓ 86% · SC 79.0This facility: 10.8, 86% below the SC average of 79.0 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
The Oaks of Orangeburg’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending September 2024, compared with 104 South Carolina nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Sep 2024
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, and more than last year
−7.4% operating margin
−5.0 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 8 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($0.2M) trims the net loss to −$0.1M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Payroll in line with South Carolina homes
62.4% payroll share of revenue
SC average 60.8%Rank #26 / 104Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 26th out of 104 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the South Carolina average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll fell $4.3M while revenue fell $6.1M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with South Carolina homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | SC median | Compared with SC homesRank in SC | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $4.9M | −$6.1M | Trend 20172024 | SC median $11.8M | Rank in SC Rank #99 / 104Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 99th out of 104 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the South Carolina average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 5% of homes | Below SC median Higher net patient revenue than 5% of SC homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $5.3M | −$6.0M | Trend 20172024 | SC median $12.9M | Rank in SC Rank #101 / 104Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 101st out of 104 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other South Carolina homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 3% of homes | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$0.4M | −$0.1M | Trend 20172024 | SC median $0.1M | Rank in SC Rank #64 / 104Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 64th out of 104 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other South Carolina homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 39% of homes | Loss, widening Resident care lost money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −7.4% | −5.0 pts | Trend 20172024 | SC median 1.2% | Rank in SC Rank #72 / 104Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 72nd out of 104 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other South Carolina homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 31% of homes | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.2M | — | Trend — | SC median $0.1M | Rank in SC Rank #40 / 100Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 40th out of 100 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other South Carolina homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 61% of homes | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$0.1M | +$0.1M | Trend — | SC median $0.3M | Rank in SC Rank #68 / 103Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 68th out of 103 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other South Carolina homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 34% of homes | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Staff spending in line with South Carolina homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | SC median | Compared with SC homesRank in SC | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $3.1M | −$4.3M | Trend 20172024 | SC median $7.4M | Rank in SC Rank #100 / 104Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 100th out of 104 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the South Carolina average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 4% of homes | Below SC median Higher payroll than 4% of SC homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 62.4% | −3.9 pts | Trend 20172024 | SC median 57.6% | Rank in SC Rank #26 / 104Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 26th out of 104 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the South Carolina average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 76% of homes | Near SC average The SC average is 60.8% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · SC benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the South Carolina payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin SC payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $20.1M | $19.7M | $19.5M | $18.6M | $9.2M | $9.3M | $11.0M | $4.9M |
| Operating expenses | $21.9M | $23.1M | $21.6M | $19.3M | $10.5M | $10.0M | $11.3M | $5.3M |
| Net patient income | −$1.8M | −$3.4M | −$2.1M | −$0.7M | −$1.4M | −$0.8M | −$0.3M | −$0.4M |
| Operating margin | −8.7% | −17.3% | −11.0% | −3.7% | −15.3% | −8.5% | −2.4% | −7.4% |
| Net income | −$0.7M | −$2.8M | −$1.6M | $1.5M | $0.8M | −$0.8M | −$0.3M | −$0.1M |
| Payroll costs | $9.0M | $7.6M | $6.9M | $7.5M | $4.0M | $5.8M | $7.3M | $3.1M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 44.7% | 38.9% | 35.4% | 40.4% | 43.3% | 62.5% | 66.3% | 62.4% |
| Beds | 122 | 99 | 122 | 122 | 122 | 122 | 122 | 122 |
| Gross revenue | $21.7M | $21.6M | $21.6M | $21.3M | $9.8M | $11.1M | $13.1M | $5.6M |
| Salaries | $8.1M | $7.4M | $6.7M | $7.1M | $3.6M | $5.1M | $6.4M | $2.7M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.9M | $0.2M | $0.2M | $0.4M | $0.3M | $0.7M | $0.9M | $0.4M |
| Contract labor | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other operating costs | $12.9M | $15.4M | $14.7M | $11.8M | $6.6M | $4.3M | $4.0M | $2.2M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $600 | $781 | $697 | $643 | $633 | $291 | $323 | $255 |
| Cost per day | $653 | $917 | $773 | $667 | $729 | $316 | $331 | $274 |
| Average length of stay | 254.2 days | 133.3 days | 168.7 days | 105.9 days | 89.3 days | 144.0 days | 86.1 days | 84.9 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
203 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
66 · 33%
Medicaid
36 · 18%
Private pay & other
101 · 50%
Resident snapshot
118 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
8 · 7%
Medicaid
86 · 73%
Private pay & other
24 · 20%
Leaving
227 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
82 · 36%
Medicaid
48 · 21%
Private pay & other
97 · 43%
Mix of rehab and long-term care
This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.
Places of interest near The Oaks of Orangeburg
4.7 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Orangeburg's city center to The Oaks of Orangeburg's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to The Oaks of Orangeburg
Add your location
Financial Assistance for
Assisted Living in South Carolina
The Oaks of Orangeburg is located in Orangeburg, South Carolina.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in South Carolina.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about The Oaks of Orangeburg
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 What neighborhood is The Oaks of Orangeburg in?
The Oaks of Orangeburg is in the Felder neighborhood of Orangeburg.
02 What is the occupancy rate at The Oaks of Orangeburg?
The Oaks of Orangeburg's occupancy is 95.7%.
03 Are pets allowed at The Oaks of Orangeburg?
Yes, The Oaks of Orangeburg allows residents to bring their pets.
04 Does The Oaks of Orangeburg operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
The Oaks of Orangeburg is registered as a for-profit in SC.
05 What is the overall rating for The Oaks of Orangeburg?
The Oaks of Orangeburg received a 1-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
06 How many beds does The Oaks of Orangeburg have?
The Oaks of Orangeburg has 122 beds.
07 Are there photos of The Oaks of Orangeburg?
Yes — there are 5 photos of The Oaks of Orangeburg in the photo gallery on this page.
Updated on
