We arrange tours, appointments, and even moving support so you don’t have to
The Overall CMS Rating is scored from 1 to 5 stars and combines results from health inspections, staffing levels, and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
The Overall CMS Rating is scored from 1 to 5 stars and combines results from health inspections, staffing levels, and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Located in Stanislaus County, Modesto, CA, Vintage Faire Residential is a dedicated senior living community that offers premiere assisted living, palliative care, respite care, and hospice services. Residents settle into fully furnished rooms with patios and large front garden area for a relaxing living space with daily housekeeping services to keep the residence spotless and comfortable at all times. The community offers residents 24-hour supervision, 7 days a week and access to an array of supportive services for a comfortable and convenient living experience.
Planned activities, social functions, and outings are regularly conducted to provide residents plenty of opportunities for meaningful engagements and making enriching experiences. Residents are always energized and nourished with three home-cooked meals daily and two scheduled snacks prepared by a hardworking team of chefs. In addition to round-the-clock supervision, there are Emergency Call Systems installed in every residence to keep residents safe and provide them immediate response during emergencies.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Daily nursing hours per resident by staff type, reported to CMS. Higher is generally better — compare this facility to state and national averages to see where staffing stands.
This home is ranked 181st out of 346 homes in California. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
| Staff type | Hours / Day / Resident | vs state avg |
|---|---|---|
|
Total Nursing (Weekend)
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
| 3h 40m per day |
Higher than the California average: 72.8%Vintage Faire Residential is legally operated by Deer Tail Senior Living, Inc., and administrated by Prithika Bandhana Singh.
In California, the Department of Social Services (for assisted living facilities) and the Department of Public Health (for nursing homes) conduct inspections to ensure resident safety and regulatory compliance.
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the California state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Citations
| This Facility | CA Average | vs. CA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total citations
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 0 | 10 | This facility has 100% fewer total citations than a typical California nursing home (0 vs. CA avg 10).↓ 100% better |
Inspections & Visits
| This Facility | CA Average | vs. CA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total visits
Combined count of complaint visits, other regulatory visits, and official scheduled inspections.
| 2 | 16 | This facility has 88% fewer total visits than a typical California nursing home (2 vs. CA avg 16).↓ 88% better |
|
Complaint visits
On-site visits triggered by formal complaints filed by residents, families, or staff.
| 0 | 13 | This facility has 100% fewer complaint visits than a typical California nursing home (0 vs. CA avg 13).↓ 100% better |
|
Other visits
Regulatory visits that are neither routine inspections nor complaint investigations — administrative check-ins, follow-up reviews, licensing-related visits.
| 2 | 7 | This facility has 71% fewer other visits than a typical California nursing home (2 vs. CA avg 7).↓ 71% better |
An editor-reviewed summary of the themes and findings across this facility's recent inspection reports.
This facility’s record is mostly clean, with no deficiencies found during the May 16, 2025 pre-licensing inspection. On August 25, 2025, inspectors issued an Order of Immediate Exclusion for one staff member due to conduct harmful to residents. No other complaints or deficiencies were substantiated, and the facility maintained compliance with safety and operational standards.
Read the full inspection reports for this facility, including detailed findings and corrective actions.
Show Inspection ReportsCalifornia average 12.5
Last Health inspection on Apr 2025
California average 50.2
California average 4.65
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
58 of 66 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 8 of 66 resulted from complaint investigations.
100% better than California averageCalifornia average: 0.4
100% better than California averageCalifornia average: 1
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Reporting period: October 1 – December 31, 2025 (Q4 2025). Source: CMS Payroll-Based Journal report.
1590809% better than California average
5% worse than California average
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Manages medical care and health needs.
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
7.7 hoursNo contractors work on this role.
Assists with medical care and medications.
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
7.6 hoursNo contractors work on this role.
Helps with daily care and mobility.
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
7.4 hoursNo contractors work on this role.
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Total hours from contractors
0 contractor hours this quarter
No contractor roles were reported this quarter.
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
| Certified Nursing Assistant | 66 | 0 | 66 | 21,528 | 92 | 100% | 7.4 |
| Licensed Practical Nurse | 23 | 0 | 23 | 8,485 | 92 | 100% | 7.6 |
| Dental Services Staff | 8 | 0 | 8 | 3,461 | 82 | 89% | 7.8 |
| Registered Nurse | 10 | 0 | 10 | 2,557 | 92 | 100% | 7.7 |
| Other Dietary Services Staff | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1,058 | 90 | 98% | 7.9 |
| Clinical Nurse Specialist | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1,048 | 66 | 72% | 8 |
| Respiratory Therapy Technician | 5 | 0 | 5 | 1,003 | 66 | 72% | 6.6 |
| Speech Language Pathologist | 4 | 0 | 4 | 975 | 76 | 83% | 5.4 |
| Qualified Social Worker | 4 | 0 | 4 | 774 | 74 | 80% | 5.3 |
| RN Director of Nursing | 2 | 0 | 2 | 697 | 57 | 62% | 8.8 |
| Dietitian | 2 | 0 | 2 | 624 | 59 | 64% | 7.8 |
| Physical Therapy Assistant | 4 | 0 | 4 | 585 | 75 | 82% | 4.3 |
| Nurse Practitioner | 1 | 0 | 1 | 528 | 66 | 72% | 8 |
| Administrator | 1 | 0 | 1 | 496 | 62 | 67% | 8 |
| Therapeutic Recreation Specialist | 1 | 0 | 1 | 241 | 53 | 58% | 4.5 |
| Physical Therapy Aide | 4 | 0 | 4 | 140 | 55 | 60% | 1.9 |
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials were reported in the last 3 years.
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
A composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and activities of daily living decline.
2.9
56% better than California averageCalifornia average: 6.6
A composite score based on activities of daily living decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence.
7.9
31% better than California averageCalifornia average: 11.3
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7.0%
37% better than California averageCalifornia average: 11.1%
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
2.4%
80% better than California averageCalifornia average: 12.0%
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
14.1%
25% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 11.3%
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.8%
52% better than California averageCalifornia average: 1.7%
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
1.9%
61% better than California averageCalifornia average: 5.0%
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.6%
30% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 1.2%
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.4%
44% better than California averageCalifornia average: 4.2%
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
14.6%
118% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 6.7%
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
10.8%
7% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 10.1%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
In line with California averageCalifornia average: 98.5%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
In line with California averageCalifornia average: 98.2%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.7%
5% better than California averageCalifornia average: 94.0%
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.3%
12% better than California averageCalifornia average: 1.5%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.4%
In line with California averageCalifornia average: 93.2%
Quality measures are calculated from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. For most measures, lower percentages indicate better care quality.
24% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
70% of new residents, often for short stays.
6% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jan 2026)
Total residents
88Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Historical financial and operational data for Vintage Faire Residential based on CMS SNF Cost Reports.
The portion of the home's budget spent on staff, including nurses, caregivers, and other employees who support care and operations.
Rank #173 / 347Payroll — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 173rd out of 347 homes in California. Shows total annual staff payroll benchmarked to the California average. Higher payroll investment relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on cheaper contract labor.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
All remaining costs needed to run the home, such as food, utilities, building maintenance, supplies and administrative expenses.
Housing Options: Studio
Building Type: Single-story
Transportation Services
Fitness and Recreation
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
4.6 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Modesto's city center to Vintage Faire Residential's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Add your location
Vintage Faire Residential is located in Modesto, California.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in California.
The legal owner and operator of Vintage Faire Residential is Deer Tail Senior Living, Inc..
Vintage Faire Residential has a walk score of 51. Moderately walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Vintage Faire Residential's occupancy is 88%.
Yes — see the floorplan options available at Vintage Faire Residential on this page.
Prithika Bandhana Singh is the administrator of Vintage Faire Residential.
Vintage Faire Residential has 49 beds.
Yes — there are 6 photos of Vintage Faire Residential in the photo gallery on this page.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Thank you for your interest!
Our team will be in touch shortly to help with next steps.
