3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Offering a tranquil environment for senior living, Claremont Manor Care Center is a lush paradise surrounded by nature, granting residents peace and relaxation. Exceptional care services provided here include inpatient and outpatient therapy, short-term rehab, hospice, and 24/7 skilled nursing. An expert team collaborates closely with residents to establish personalized care plans, ensuring each person’s unique needs are met, fostering a warm and secure community.
As part of the luxurious amenities Claremont prides itself on, residents can explore independent living options, indulge in delicious restaurant-style dining, and participate in a variety of social activities. The charming village of Claremont, California, is just a few clicks away, providing convenient access to shops, restaurants, and cultural attractions, for a fulfilling and enriching retirement experience.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Daily nursing hours per resident by staff type, reported to CMS. Higher is generally better — compare this facility to state and national averages to see where staffing stands.
This home is ranked 16th out of 293 homes in California for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
| Staff type | Hours / Day / Resident | vs state avg |
|---|---|---|
|
Registered Nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes.
| 23m per day | ▼ 40% State avg: 39m per day · National avg: 41m per day |
|
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care.
| 1h 36m per day | ▲ 31% State avg: 1h 13m per day · National avg: 52m per day |
|
Nurse Aide
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life.
| 2h 41m per day | ■ Avg State avg: 2h 39m per day · National avg: 2h 21m per day |
|
Weekend Total Nursing
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
| 4h 12m per day | ▲ 3% State avg: 4h 5m per day · National avg: 3h 26m per day |
|
Physical Therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
| 4m per day | ▼ 13% State avg: 5m per day · National avg: 4m per day |
|
Weekend RN
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
| 23m per day | ▼ 24% State avg: 30m per day · National avg: 29m per day |
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Claremont Manor Care Center is legally operated by Front Porch Communities And Services, and administered by Robert Barton.
In California, the Department of Social Services (for assisted living facilities) and the Department of Public Health (for nursing homes) conduct inspections to ensure resident safety and regulatory compliance.
A composite 0–100 score combining this facility's inspections, citations, complaints, and enforcement actions relative to the California state average. The score below shows how many points this facility sits above or below the typical California nursing home score (the benchmark); higher is better.This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine score.
1 point above the California average for nursing homes (81/100)
Rank #793 / 1400 in California Inspection Score — State benchmarked This home is ranked 793rd out of 1400 homes in California for inspection score. Shows this facility's inspection score compared to the California average among 1400 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Facilities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings are based only on facilities in California that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine score. Inspection score: 82 out of 100. Letter grade B-. 1 point above the California average for nursing homes (81/100)
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the California state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Citations
| This Facility | CA Average | vs. CA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total citations
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 5 | 10 | This facility has 50% fewer total citations than a typical California nursing home (5 vs. CA avg 10).↓ 50% better |
|
Serious citations (Type A)
Citations that pose an immediate risk to resident health or safety. Type A citations are the most serious and typically require prompt corrective action.
| 3 | 3 | This facility has serious citations (type a) in line with the California average (3 vs. CA avg 3).— At avg Rank #753 / 1159 Serious citations (Type A) — State benchmarked This home is ranked 753rd out of 1159 homes in California for # of serious citations. Shows this facility's # of serious citations compared to the California average among 1159 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Facilities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings are based only on facilities in California that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking. |
|
Moderate citations (Type B)
Citations that do not pose an immediate risk but still represent a departure from required care or operational standards.
| 2 | 4 | This facility has 50% fewer moderate citations (type b) than a typical California nursing home (2 vs. CA avg 4).↓ 50% better |
|
Citations per inspection
Average citations per inspection.
| 0.2 | 3.3 | This facility has 94% fewer citations per inspection than a typical California nursing home (0.2 vs. CA avg 3.3).↓ 94% better |
Inspections & Visits
| This Facility | CA Average | vs. CA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total visits
Combined count of complaint visits, other regulatory visits, and official scheduled inspections.
| 24 | 16 | This facility has 50% more total visits than a typical California nursing home (24 vs. CA avg 16).↑ 50% worse |
|
Complaint visits
On-site visits triggered by formal complaints filed by residents, families, or staff.
| 11 | 13 | This facility has 15% fewer complaint visits than a typical California nursing home (11 vs. CA avg 13).↓ 15% better Rank #884 / 1386 Complaint visits — State benchmarked This home is ranked 884th out of 1386 homes in California for # of complaint visits. Shows this facility's # of complaint visits compared to the California average among 1386 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Facilities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings are based only on facilities in California that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking. |
|
Other visits
Regulatory visits that are neither routine inspections nor complaint investigations — administrative check-ins, follow-up reviews, licensing-related visits.
| 8 | 7 | This facility has 14% more other visits than a typical California nursing home (8 vs. CA avg 7).↑ 14% worse |
|
Official inspections
Routine, scheduled inspections conducted by state regulators to evaluate whether the facility meets federal and state standards.
| 5 | 4 | This facility has 25% more official inspections than a typical California nursing home (5 vs. CA avg 4).↑ 25% worse |
|
Complaint investigations
On-site investigations triggered by complaints filed with California regulators.
| 8 | 10 | This facility has 20% fewer complaint investigations than a typical California nursing home (8 vs. CA avg 10).↓ 20% better |
An editor-reviewed summary of the themes and findings across this facility's recent inspection reports.
State average 12.5
Last Health inspection on Jul 2025
State average 50.2
State average 4.65
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
49 of 67 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 18 of 67 resulted from complaint investigations.
100% better than State averageState average: 0.4
In line with State averageState average: 1
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Reporting period: October 1 – December 31, 2025 (Q4 2025). Source: CMS Payroll-Based Journal report.
19% more staff per resident than California average
0% compared with California average
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Manages medical care and health needs.
All 6 RN Staff are full-time employees. No contractors work on this role.
6
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
7.9 hoursAssists with medical care and medications.
No LPN Staff reported this quarter.
0
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
—Helps with daily care and mobility.
33 total: 27 full-time employees and 6 contractors.
33
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
8.2 hours
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Total hours from contractors
1,476 contractor hours this quarter
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
| Certified Nursing Assistant | 27 | 6 | 33 | 9,279 | 92 | 100% | 8.2 |
| RN Director of Nursing | 13 | 0 | 13 | 5,512 | 92 | 100% | 8.2 |
| Registered Nurse | 6 | 0 | 6 | 885 | 83 | 90% | 7.9 |
| Other Dietary Services Staff | 3 | 0 | 3 | 795 | 89 | 97% | 7.1 |
| Administrator | 1 | 1 | 2 | 592 | 64 | 70% | 4.8 |
| Dental Services Staff | 1 | 0 | 1 | 400 | 56 | 61% | 7.2 |
| Speech Language Pathologist | 0 | 3 | 3 | 373 | 63 | 68% | 5.9 |
| Physical Therapy Aide | 0 | 3 | 3 | 321 | 64 | 70% | 4.4 |
| Nurse Practitioner | 1 | 0 | 1 | 288 | 36 | 39% | 8 |
| Respiratory Therapy Technician | 0 | 3 | 3 | 252 | 75 | 82% | 3.2 |
| Clinical Nurse Specialist | 1 | 0 | 1 | 171 | 25 | 27% | 6.9 |
| Physical Therapy Assistant | 0 | 4 | 4 | 160 | 44 | 48% | 3.6 |
| Qualified Social Worker | 0 | 1 | 1 | 73 | 39 | 42% | 1.9 |
| Medical Director | 0 | 1 | 1 | 63 | 33 | 36% | 1.9 |
| Occupational Therapy Assistant | 0 | 5 | 5 | 40 | 8 | 9% | 4.5 |
| Other Physician | 0 | 2 | 2 | 18 | 13 | 14% | 1.2 |
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database (Data as of Jan 2026)
71% lower than California averageCalifornia average: $55K
58% fewer fines than California averageCalifornia average: 2.4
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
100% fewer payment denials than California averageCalifornia average: 0.5
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials were reported in the last 3 years.
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
A composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and activities of daily living decline.
11.9
80% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 6.6
A composite score based on activities of daily living decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence.
20.3
79% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 11.3
CMS star rating based on long-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = significantly above average, 1 star = significantly below average.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
13.5%
22% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 11.1%
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
26.6%
122% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 12.0%
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
20.8%
84% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 11.3%
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
100% better than California averageCalifornia average: 1.7%
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
11.7%
137% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 5.0%
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
100% better than California averageCalifornia average: 1.2%
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.9%
88% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 4.2%
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
100% better than California averageCalifornia average: 6.7%
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
16.1%
60% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 10.1%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
In line with California averageCalifornia average: 98.5%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.0%
In line with California averageCalifornia average: 98.2%
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.24
In line with California averageCalifornia average: 2.25
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.91
20% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 1.59
CMS star rating based on short-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = much above average, 1 star = much below average.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.3%
6% better than California averageCalifornia average: 94.0%
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
100% better than California averageCalifornia average: 1.5%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.1%
In line with California averageCalifornia average: 93.2%
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
20.5%
12% better than California averageCalifornia average: 23.2%
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
11.8%
5% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 11.2%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
100% better than California averageCalifornia average: 0.8%
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
52.9%
In line with California averageCalifornia average: 53.7%
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
59.5%
18% better than California averageCalifornia average: 50.6%
Quality measures are calculated from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. For most measures, lower percentages indicate better care quality.
38% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
61% of new residents, often for short stays.
1% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jan 2026)
Total residents
38Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
State-approved Nurse Aide Training and Competency Evaluation Program on-site
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Historical financial and operational data for Claremont Manor Care Center from 2012–2023, based on CMS SNF Cost Reports.
Key figures below are for fiscal year ending in 12/2023.
Based on CMS SNF Cost Report for fiscal year ending in 12/2023.
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Money the home earns outside of resident care — such as investments, grants, rentals and other non-operating sources (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It is tracked separately from net patient revenue: it is not part of that figure, and it is not included in net patient income.
Staff salaries plus wage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement — from the home's own accounting records (CMS cost report, Worksheet A). Contract or agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs.
Rank #18 / 295Payroll — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 18th out of 295 homes in California for payroll. Shows total annual staff payroll benchmarked to the California average. Higher payroll investment relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on cheaper contract labor.Facilities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings are based only on facilities in California that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Payroll as a share of revenue: staff salaries and wage-related benefits divided by net patient revenue. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay.
Rank #223 / 295Payroll % — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 223rd out of 295 homes in California for payroll %. Shows payroll as a percentage of revenue versus the California average. Well-run California facilities typically land around 56–67% — the top third Statewide. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings.Facilities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings are based only on facilities in California that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Everything it costs to run the home apart from payroll — food, utilities, supplies, maintenance, contract labor and administration. Calculated as total operating expense minus payroll (staff salaries and wage-related benefits).
The home's total operating expense for the year — all the costs of running it, salaries included (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3).
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Most new residents arrive under private pay (61% of admissions), and a typical private pay stay runs around 5 - 6 months.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
0.3 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Claremont's city center to Claremont Manor Care Center's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 1.24 miles to nearest hospital (Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare)
Add your location
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the CA Dept. of Social Services (CDSS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest to lowest based on our ranking methodology.
| Vi at Palo Alto | NH AL IL MC SNF | Palo Alto | 876
Facility
876
CA AVG
104
Rank
#1 / 1644 |
73.1%
Facility
73.1%
CA AVG
73.9
Rank
#851 / 1492 | -1% | 5.11
Facility
5.11
CA AVG
4.22
Rank
#32 / 293 | +28% | +21% | $0
Facility
$0
CA AVG
$56.5k
Rank
#1 / 298 | 90
Facility
90
CA AVG
81
Rank
#398 / 1400 | 18
Facility
18
CA AVG
50.2
Rank
#28 / 293 | 3.0
Facility
3.0
CA AVG
4.6
Rank
#55 / 293 | 1 | 640 | - |
80
Facility
80
CA AVG
57
Rank
#416 / 2087 | Cary Maslow | $15.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$15.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
$17.0M
Rank
#2 / 295 | $10.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$10.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
$7.0M
Rank
#63 / 295 | 70.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
70.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
45.2%
Rank
#295 / 295 | 555835 | ||||
| Canterbury Woods | NH AL IL SNF | Pacific Grove | 190
Facility
190
CA AVG
104
Rank
#180 / 1644 |
72.6%
Facility
72.6%
CA AVG
73.9
Rank
#865 / 1492 | -2% | 6.30
Facility
6.30
CA AVG
4.22
Rank
#8 / 293 | +10% | +49% | $0
Facility
$0
CA AVG
$56.5k
Rank
#1 / 298 | 91
Facility
91
CA AVG
81
Rank
#355 / 1400 | 26
Facility
26
CA AVG
50.2
Rank
#73 / 293 | 8.7
Facility
8.7
CA AVG
4.6
Rank
#284 / 293 | - | 138 | A+ |
81
Facility
81
CA AVG
57
Rank
#383 / 2087 | Shaida Behnam | $3.2MFiscal year ending 03/2024
Facility
$3.2MFiscal year ending 03/2024
CA AVG
$17.0M
Rank
#155 / 295 | $5.7MFiscal year ending 03/2024
Facility
$5.7MFiscal year ending 03/2024
CA AVG
$7.0M
Rank
#229 / 295 | 176.7%Fiscal year ending 03/2024
Facility
176.7%Fiscal year ending 03/2024
CA AVG
45.2%
Rank
#257 / 295 | 55303 | ||||
| Webster House | NH AL IL SNF | Palo Alto (Crescent Park) | 54
Facility
54
CA AVG
104
Rank
#1114 / 1644 |
90.7%
Facility
90.7%
CA AVG
73.9
Rank
#324 / 1492 | +23% | 4.93
Facility
4.93
CA AVG
4.22
Rank
#44 / 293 | +21% | +17% | $0
Facility
$0
CA AVG
$56.5k
Rank
#1 / 298 | 94
Facility
94
CA AVG
81
Rank
#185 / 1400 | 23
Facility
23
CA AVG
50.2
Rank
#54 / 293 | 5.8
Facility
5.8
CA AVG
4.6
Rank
#240 / 293 | - | 49 | - |
90
Facility
90
CA AVG
57
Rank
#171 / 2087 | Elvyra Abare | $10.2MFiscal year ending 03/2024
Facility
$10.2MFiscal year ending 03/2024
CA AVG
$17.0M
Rank
#139 / 295 | $7.8MFiscal year ending 03/2024
Facility
$7.8MFiscal year ending 03/2024
CA AVG
$7.0M
Rank
#144 / 295 | 76.2%Fiscal year ending 03/2024
Facility
76.2%Fiscal year ending 03/2024
CA AVG
45.2%
Rank
#155 / 295 | 555156 | ||||
| The Vineyards – California Armenian Home | NH AL IL MC RESC SNF | Fresno (Roosevelt) | 412
Facility
412
CA AVG
104
Rank
#27 / 1644 |
54.1%
Facility
54.1%
CA AVG
73.9
Rank
#1265 / 1492 | -27% | 4.63
Facility
4.63
CA AVG
4.22
Rank
#66 / 293 | +6% | +10% | $0
Facility
$0
CA AVG
$56.5k
Rank
#1 / 298 | 91
Facility
91
CA AVG
81
Rank
#355 / 1400 | 37
Facility
37
CA AVG
50.2
Rank
#129 / 293 | 6.2
Facility
6.2
CA AVG
4.6
Rank
#249 / 293 | 1 | 223 | - |
24
Facility
24
CA AVG
57
Rank
#1793 / 2087 | Lucy Grayson | $13.8MFiscal year ending 05/2024
Facility
$13.8MFiscal year ending 05/2024
CA AVG
$17.0M
Rank
#170 / 295 | $9.6MFiscal year ending 05/2024
Facility
$9.6MFiscal year ending 05/2024
CA AVG
$7.0M
Rank
#98 / 295 | 69.8%Fiscal year ending 05/2024
Facility
69.8%Fiscal year ending 05/2024
CA AVG
45.2%
Rank
#29 / 295 | 55955 | ||||
| Claremont Manor Care Center | NH AL HOS RC SNF | Claremont | 360
Facility
360
CA AVG
104
Rank
#34 / 1644 | - | - | 5.55
Facility
5.55
CA AVG
4.22
Rank
#16 / 293 | -18% | +31% | $0
Facility
$0
CA AVG
$56.5k
Rank
#1 / 298 | 82
Facility
82
CA AVG
81
Rank
#793 / 1400 | 67
Facility
67
CA AVG
50.2
Rank
#240 / 293 | 3.9
Facility
3.9
CA AVG
4.6
Rank
#137 / 293 | 1 | 38 | - |
90
Facility
90
CA AVG
57
Rank
#171 / 2087 | Diana Japenga | $13.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$13.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
$17.0M
Rank
#21 / 295 | $16.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$16.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
$7.0M
Rank
#18 / 295 | 124.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
124.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
45.2%
Rank
#223 / 295 | 555085 |
Claremont Manor Care Center is legally operated by Front Porch Communities And Services, and administered by Robert Barton.
Claremont Manor Care Center has a walk score of 90. Walker's paradise. Daily errands do not require a car, with many shops and services nearby.
Claremont Manor Care Center's occupancy is 0.0%.
Claremont Manor Care Center has been operating for approximately 13 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
No, Claremont Manor Care Center has a no-pet policy.
Claremont Manor Care Center is registered as a non-profit in CA.
Robert Barton is the administrator of Claremont Manor Care Center.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
