Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
120
111 employees · 9 contractors · 54 on an average day Briarcliff Health & Rehabilitation Center
Nursing Home, Hospice Care, Memory Care, Palliative Care & Skilled Nursing · South Bend, IN
ALM Inspection Grade
C
ALM's inspection grade is 75 / 100, a C — 9 points below the Indiana average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 75 / 100, a C — 9 points below the Indiana average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Briarcliff Health & Rehabilitation Center
Nursing Home, Hospice Care, Memory Care, Palliative Care & Skilled Nursing · South Bend, IN
ALM Inspection Grade
C
ALM's inspection grade is 75 / 100, a C — 9 points below the Indiana average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 75 / 100, a C — 9 points below the Indiana average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Briarcliff Health & Rehabilitation Center accepts Medicaid, Medicare, and private pay.
Briarcliff Health & Rehabilitation Center, a 131-bed nursing home in South Bend, IN, counts five care types. They are hospice care, palliative care, memory care, nursing home care, and skilled nursing. Memory care is secured and supervised, so for a resident at risk of wandering, the locked door is a design feature rather than a house rule.
Hospice and palliative care are the two items whose success nobody measures in recovery, comfort being the point instead. Licensed nursing, on the other hand, is a standing presence and not an on-call arrangement. Short-term rehabilitation handles recovery after an illness or an injury.
That spread suits somebody needing dementia supervision, skilled nursing, or the comfort-focused end. Families fund it through Medicaid, Medicare, or private pay. The daily nursing figure per resident stands at 4 hours and 18 minutes.
Pulaski Memorial Hospital operates the community with Christopher Gill as administrator. A courtyard, a salon, and a spa are named amenities. In-house hemodialysis means a resident on dialysis can have it done here. A chapel is on the property too.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 37th out of 275 nursing homes we track in Indiana for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 18m
This nursing home is ranked 37th out of 275 nursing homes we track in Indiana for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 18mStandout metric: LPN / LVN is +66% above Indiana average
3 of 6 metrics below Indiana average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 7 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
7 staff · 9.9-hour shifts
18m
↓ 54% · IN 40mThis facility: 18m per resident per day, 54% below the Indiana average of 40m (among Indiana facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 7 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
7 staff · 9.9-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 23 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
23 staff · 9.7-hour shifts
1h 16m
↑ 66% · IN 46mThis facility: 1h 16m per resident per day, 66% above the Indiana average of 46m (among Indiana facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 23 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
23 staff · 9.7-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 64 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
64 staff · 8-hour shifts
2h 44m
↑ 20% · IN 2h 16mThis facility: 2h 44m per resident per day, 20% above the Indiana average of 2h 16m (among Indiana facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 64 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
64 staff · 8-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 21m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
0m
↓ 88% · IN 4mThis facility: 0m per resident per day, 88% below the Indiana average of 4m (among Indiana facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
3h 46m
↑ 17% · IN 3h 14mThis facility: 3h 46m per resident per day, 17% above the Indiana average of 3h 14m (among Indiana facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
9m
↓ 67% · IN 27mThis facility: 9m per resident per day, 67% below the Indiana average of 27m (among Indiana facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
120
111 employees · 9 contractors · 54 on an average day
120 total staff / 95 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.26 : 1
↓ 28% · IN 1.76This facility: 1.26 staff per resident, 28% below the Indiana average of 1.76 (among Indiana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
120 staff ÷ 95 residents
See full Indiana ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8.3 h
↑ 8% · IN 7.7 hThis facility: 8.3 h, 8% above the Indiana average of 7.7 h (among Indiana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
40,588 staff hours this quarter
See full Indiana ranking →98.7% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Indiana average: 92.2% · Contractors this quarter: Physical Therapy Aide (2), Respiratory Therapy Technician (2), Speech Language Pathologist (2), Clinical Nurse Specialist (1), Qualified Social Worker (1), Physical Therapy Assistant (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
131
Rank #86 / 276Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 86th out of 276 nursing homes we track in Indiana for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Indiana facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Indiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
131
Rank #86 / 276Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 86th out of 276 nursing homes we track in Indiana for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Indiana facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Indiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
Years of operating
A newer community that may feature more recent facilities and programs. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #137 / 246Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 137th out of 246 nursing homes we track in Indiana for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Indiana facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Indiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A newer community that may feature more recent facilities and programs. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #137 / 246Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 137th out of 246 nursing homes we track in Indiana for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Indiana facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Indiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
1
year
Walk Score
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #235 / 264Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 235th out of 264 nursing homes we track in Indiana for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Indiana facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Indiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #235 / 264Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 235th out of 264 nursing homes we track in Indiana for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Indiana facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Indiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
7
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #128 / 270Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 128th out of 270 nursing homes we track in Indiana for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Indiana average, with its Statewide rank out of 270. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Indiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #128 / 270Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 128th out of 270 nursing homes we track in Indiana for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Indiana average, with its Statewide rank out of 270. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Indiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
72.2%
This home usually has availability
Based on 94.6 residents and 131 beds. Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Higher than the Indiana average: 68%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
155
days
About This Community
Facility TypeNURSING HOME (Skilled Nursing Facility)
StatusActive
IssuanceJanuary 1, 2025
ExpirationDecember 31, 2026
License Number26-013420-1
CMS Certification Number155831
Briarcliff Health & Rehabilitation Center is legally operated by Pulaski Memorial Hospital, and administered by Christopher Gill.
Profit StatusNonprofit
SNF/NF (Combined)
131 units
Total beds
131 units
Resident Council
Medical DirectorPaul Kaplanis
Director of NursingKIMBERLY CHRISMAN
Accept Medicaid
Accept Medicare
Short-Term Rehab
Short-Term Rehabilitation
Doctor on Staff
In House Hemodialysis
Hospice and Palliative Care
Housekeeping
Laundry & Linen
Fax(574) 400-0619
Pets not allowed
Courtyard
Beauty Salon
Spa
Cable Tv
Wi-Fi
Non-Denominational Religious Chapel
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
75 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
9 points below the Indiana average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Typical
59 severity-weighted points (20 deficiencies) · 28% higher than the typical CMS-certified IN facility (median: 46)
Enforcement
Concern
1 enforcement action · above the typical CMS-certified IN facility (median: 0) · $10,839 in fines
Persistence
Typical
28 days to fix issues · slower than the typical CMS-certified IN facility (median: 24)
Total health inspections
5
↓ 15% · IN 5.9This facility: 5, 15% below the Indiana average of 5.9 (among Indiana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
19
Rank #135 / 277Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 135th out of 277 nursing homes we track in Indiana for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Indiana State average, with a ranking across all 277 IN facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Indiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 18% · IN 23.3This facility: 19, 18% below the Indiana average of 23.3 (among Indiana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
3.8
Rank #116 / 277Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 116th out of 277 nursing homes we track in Indiana for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Indiana mean across 277 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Indiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 2% · IN 3.86This facility: 3.8, 2% below the Indiana average of 3.86 (among Indiana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
19 of 19 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · IN 0.2This facility: 0, 100% below the Indiana average of 0.2 (among Indiana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
3
↑ 500% · IN 0.5This facility: 3, 500% above the Indiana average of 0.5 (among Indiana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
16
↓ 28% · IN 22.2This facility: 16, 28% below the Indiana average of 22.2 (among Indiana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · IN 0.3This facility: 0, 100% below the Indiana average of 0.3 (among Indiana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Mar 19, 2026 · 1 citation (Quality of Care, moderate), corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 7 of 19 citations · 7 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Mar 19, 2026
1 citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Aug 08, 2025
3 citations
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Aug 12, 2024
8 citations
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 29, 2023
1 citation
Abuse/Neglect serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jul 14, 2023
6 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 19 citations
Quality of Life & Care
7 deficiencies (37%)
Nutrition & Dietary
3 deficiencies (16%)
Pharmacy Services
3 deficiencies (16%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
2 deficiencies (11%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
2 deficiencies (11%)
Infection Control
1 deficiency (5%)
Environmental
1 deficiency (5%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
17 of 19 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 2 of 19 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
1 penalty in the past 3 years
Latest: Aug 12, 2024 · $10,839 civil money penalty
Aug 12, 2024 · $10,839 civil money penalty
Total fines
$10,839
↓ 72% · IN $39KThis facility: $10,839, 72% below the Indiana average of $39,098. Average among the 106 Indiana facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #230 / 277Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 230th out of 277 nursing homes we track in Indiana for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Indiana average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 277 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Indiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
1
↓ 15% · IN 1.18This facility: 1, 15% below the Indiana average of 1.18. Average among the 106 Indiana facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
IN avg 0.35Indiana average: 0.35. Average among the 106 Indiana facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Aug 12, 2024
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$10,839
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$10,839Fine amount comparison
This facility
$10,839
Indiana average
$39,098
US average
$66,281
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Indiana and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Indiana average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 23% · IN 4.1This facility: 5.0, 23% above the IN average of 4.1 (among IN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
1
/ 5
Significantly below average
↓ 66% · IN 2.9This facility: 1.0, 66% below the IN average of 2.9 (among IN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
4.0
Score · lower is better
↓ 41% · IN 6.9This facility: 4.0, 41% below the IN average of 6.9 (among IN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
12.0
Score · lower is better
↓ 19% · IN 14.8This facility: 12.0, 19% below the IN average of 14.8 (among IN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 8 better, 3 worse, 2 near IN average
6 short-stay measures: 4 better, 1 worse, 1 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.9%
↓ 55% · IN 10.8This facility: 4.9, 55% below the IN average of 10.8 (among IN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.9%
↓ 55% · IN 10.8This facility: 4.9, 55% below the IN average of 10.8 (among IN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
5.4%
↓ 51% · IN 11.1This facility: 5.4, 51% below the IN average of 11.1 (among IN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
5.4%
↓ 51% · IN 11.1This facility: 5.4, 51% below the IN average of 11.1 (among IN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
25.7%
↑ 15% · IN 22.4This facility: 25.7, 15% above the IN average of 22.4 (among IN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
25.7%
↑ 15% · IN 22.4This facility: 25.7, 15% above the IN average of 22.4 (among IN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
↓ 100% · IN 1.1This facility: 0.0, 100% below the IN average of 1.1 (among IN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
↓ 100% · IN 1.1This facility: 0.0, 100% below the IN average of 1.1 (among IN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.4%
↑ 41% · IN 3.8This facility: 5.4, 41% above the IN average of 3.8 (among IN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.4%
↑ 41% · IN 3.8This facility: 5.4, 41% above the IN average of 3.8 (among IN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
1.9%
↓ 45% · IN 3.5This facility: 1.9, 45% below the IN average of 3.5 (among IN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
1.9%
↓ 45% · IN 3.5This facility: 1.9, 45% below the IN average of 3.5 (among IN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.5%
↓ 52% · IN 5.3This facility: 2.5, 52% below the IN average of 5.3 (among IN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.5%
↓ 52% · IN 5.3This facility: 2.5, 52% below the IN average of 5.3 (among IN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
11.4%
↓ 55% · IN 25.5This facility: 11.4, 55% below the IN average of 25.5 (among IN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
11.4%
↓ 55% · IN 25.5This facility: 11.4, 55% below the IN average of 25.5 (among IN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.1%
↓ 4% · IN 13.7This facility: 13.1, 4% below the IN average of 13.7 (among IN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.1%
↓ 4% · IN 13.7This facility: 13.1, 4% below the IN average of 13.7 (among IN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 7% · IN 93.7This facility: 100.0, 7% above the IN average of 93.7 (among IN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 7% · IN 93.7This facility: 100.0, 7% above the IN average of 93.7 (among IN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
99.0%
↑ 4% · IN 95.1This facility: 99.0, 4% above the IN average of 95.1 (among IN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
99.0%
↑ 4% · IN 95.1This facility: 99.0, 4% above the IN average of 95.1 (among IN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.17
↑ 36% · IN 1.60This facility: 2.17, 36% above the IN average of 1.60 (among IN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.17
↑ 36% · IN 1.60This facility: 2.17, 36% above the IN average of 1.60 (among IN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.32
↓ 11% · IN 1.48This facility: 1.32, 11% below the IN average of 1.48 (among IN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.32
↓ 11% · IN 1.48This facility: 1.32, 11% below the IN average of 1.48 (among IN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 6 measures
Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · IN 1.1This facility: 0.0, 100% below the IN average of 1.1 (among IN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · IN 1.1This facility: 0.0, 100% below the IN average of 1.1 (among IN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.4%
↑ 21% · IN 81.9This facility: 99.4, 21% above the IN average of 81.9 (among IN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.4%
↑ 21% · IN 81.9This facility: 99.4, 21% above the IN average of 81.9 (among IN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
90.9%
↑ 15% · IN 79.2This facility: 90.9, 15% above the IN average of 79.2 (among IN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
90.9%
↑ 15% · IN 79.2This facility: 90.9, 15% above the IN average of 79.2 (among IN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
17.4%
↓ 22% · IN 22.4This facility: 17.4, 22% below the IN average of 22.4 (among IN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
17.4%
↓ 22% · IN 22.4This facility: 17.4, 22% below the IN average of 22.4 (among IN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
17.0%
↑ 62% · IN 10.5This facility: 17.0, 62% above the IN average of 10.5 (among IN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
17.0%
↑ 62% · IN 10.5This facility: 17.0, 62% above the IN average of 10.5 (among IN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Briarcliff Health & Rehabilitation Center’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 274 Indiana nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−15.8% operating margin
+0.5 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 6 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($1.8M) turns it into a net profit to $0.2M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends more on payroll than most Indiana homes
64.1% payroll share of revenue
IN average 50.9%Rank #25 / 274Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 25th out of 274 nursing homes we track in Indiana for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Indiana average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Indiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $1.9M while revenue rose $0.7M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Indiana homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | IN median | Compared with IN homesRank in IN | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $9.7M | +$0.7M | Trend 20172024 | IN median $10.2M | Rank in IN Rank #153 / 274Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 153rd out of 274 nursing homes we track in Indiana for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Indiana average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Indiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 44% of homes | Below IN median Higher net patient revenue than 44% of IN homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $11.3M | +$0.7M | Trend 20172024 | IN median $9.8M | Rank in IN Rank #104 / 274Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 104th out of 274 nursing homes we track in Indiana for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Indiana homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Indiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 62% of homes | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$1.5M | −$0.1M | Trend 20172024 | IN median $0.3M | Rank in IN Rank #251 / 274Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 251st out of 274 nursing homes we track in Indiana for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Indiana homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Indiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 8% of homes | Loss, widening Resident care lost money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −15.8% | +0.5 pts | Trend 20172024 | IN median 3.0% | Rank in IN Rank #249 / 274Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 249th out of 274 nursing homes we track in Indiana for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Indiana homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Indiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 9% of homes | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $1.8M | — | Trend — | IN median $0.0M | Rank in IN Rank #14 / 271Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 14th out of 271 nursing homes we track in Indiana for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Indiana homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Indiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 95% of homes | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $0.2M | −$0.1M | Trend — | IN median $0.5M | Rank in IN Rank #179 / 271Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 179th out of 271 nursing homes we track in Indiana for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Indiana homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Indiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 34% of homes | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends more of revenue on staff than most Indiana homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | IN median | Compared with IN homesRank in IN | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $6.2M | +$1.9M | Trend 20172024 | IN median $5.1M | Rank in IN Rank #85 / 274Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 85th out of 274 nursing homes we track in Indiana for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Indiana average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Indiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 69% of homes | Above IN median Higher payroll than 69% of IN homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 64.1% | +16.7 pts | Trend 20172024 | IN median 49.2% | Rank in IN Rank #25 / 274Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 25th out of 274 nursing homes we track in Indiana for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Indiana average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Indiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 91% of homes | 13.2 pts over IN average The IN average is 50.9% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · IN benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Indiana payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin IN payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $3.8M | $5.4M | $7.0M | $7.0M | $7.4M | $9.8M | $9.1M | $9.7M |
| Operating expenses | $2.9M | $5.5M | $6.5M | $7.2M | $8.6M | $10.0M | $10.6M | $11.3M |
| Net patient income | $0.9M | −$0.0M | $0.4M | −$0.2M | −$1.2M | −$0.2M | −$1.5M | −$1.5M |
| Operating margin | 24.5% | −0.7% | 6.4% | −2.5% | −16.0% | −2.4% | −16.2% | −15.8% |
| Net income | $0.9M | −$0.0M | $0.5M | $0.5M | $0.3M | $0.4M | $0.4M | $0.2M |
| Payroll costs | $2.2M | $3.3M | $3.4M | $3.9M | $3.1M | $3.9M | $4.3M | $6.2M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 58.1% | 60.2% | 49.0% | 55.1% | 42.2% | 39.7% | 47.4% | 64.1% |
| Beds | 71 | 111 | 111 | 111 | 111 | 111 | 131 | 131 |
| Gross revenue | $6.4M | $7.9M | $8.1M | $9.0M | $9.6M | $12.3M | $10.8M | $11.2M |
| Salaries | $2.0M | $2.9M | $3.0M | $3.4M | $2.7M | $3.4M | $3.8M | $5.6M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.3M | $0.3M | $0.4M | $0.5M | $0.4M | $0.5M | $0.5M | $0.7M |
| Contract labor | $0.5M | $1.2M | $0.7M | $1.4M | $2.1M | $1.8M | $1.5M | $0.4M |
| Other operating costs | $0.7M | $2.2M | $3.1M | $3.3M | $5.4M | $6.1M | $6.3M | $5.0M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $287 | $267 | $302 | $321 | $354 | $314 | $300 | $310 |
| Cost per day | $217 | $269 | $282 | $329 | $410 | $322 | $349 | $359 |
| Average length of stay | 101.2 days | 183.1 days | 112.8 days | 164.4 days | 132.0 days | 201.0 days | 189.0 days | 154.7 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
210 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
26 · 12%
Medicaid
92 · 44%
Private pay & other
92 · 44%
Resident snapshot
95 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
7 · 7%
Medicaid
74 · 78%
Private pay & other
14 · 15%
Leaving
203 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
13 · 6%
Medicaid
109 · 54%
Private pay & other
81 · 40%
Mostly long-term care residents
Most residents stay for extended periods and receive ongoing daily care.
Places of interest near Briarcliff Health & Rehabilitation Center
5.2 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from South Bend's city center to Briarcliff Health & Rehabilitation Center's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Briarcliff Health & Rehabilitation Center
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around South Bend
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the IN Dept. of Health (IDOH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
ADC (Adult Day Care):
Daytime supervision, health monitoring, and social activities for seniors who live at home.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Indiana average is: 50.9% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cardinal Nursing and Rehabilitation | NH HOS RC SNF | South Bend | 144
Facility
144
IN AVG
119
Rank
#64 / 276 | A |
44.4%
Facility
44.4%
IN AVG
68%
Rank
#242 / 270 | -35% | 3.54
Facility
3.54
IN AVG
3.48
Rank
#110 / 275 | +129% | +2% | $0
Facility
$0
IN AVG
$45.5k
Rank
#1 / 277 | 13
Facility
13
IN AVG
23.3
Rank
#67 / 277 | 3.3
Facility
3.3
IN AVG
3.9
Rank
#116 / 277 | - | 64 | - |
75
Facility
75
IN AVG
44
Rank
#30 / 264 | Kathryn Lape | $8.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
IN AVG
$11.1M
Rank
#181 / 274 | $4.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$4.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
IN AVG
$5.5M
Rank
#151 / 274 | 55.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
55.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
IN AVG
50.9%
Rank
#64 / 274 | 155115 | ||||
| West Bend Nursing and Rehabilitation | NH HOS MC RC SNF | South Bend | 157
Facility
157
IN AVG
119
Rank
#53 / 276 | B+ |
42.7%
Facility
42.7%
IN AVG
68%
Rank
#247 / 270 | -37% | 3.49
Facility
3.49
IN AVG
3.48
Rank
#110 / 275 | -15% | 0% | $0
Facility
$0
IN AVG
$45.5k
Rank
#1 / 277 | 18
Facility
18
IN AVG
23.3
Rank
#123 / 277 | 4.5
Facility
4.5
IN AVG
3.9
Rank
#192 / 277 | - | 67 | - |
68
Facility
68
IN AVG
44
Rank
#56 / 264 | Emily Bailey | $7.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
IN AVG
$11.1M
Rank
#208 / 274 | $4.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$4.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
IN AVG
$5.5M
Rank
#172 / 274 | 57.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
57.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
IN AVG
50.9%
Rank
#47 / 274 | 155355 | ||||
| The Milton Home | NH AL HOS PC RC SNF | South Bend | 62
Facility
62
IN AVG
119
Rank
#245 / 276 | ? |
40.3%
Facility
40.3%
IN AVG
68%
Rank
#250 / 270 | -41% | 3.87
Facility
3.87
IN AVG
3.48
Rank
#65 / 275 | +70% | +11% | $0
Facility
$0
IN AVG
$45.5k
Rank
#1 / 277 | 15
Facility
15
IN AVG
23.3
Rank
#89 / 277 | 3.0
Facility
3.0
IN AVG
3.9
Rank
#96 / 277 | - | 25 | - |
81
Facility
81
IN AVG
44
Rank
#9 / 264 | Pulaski Memorial Hospital | $4.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$4.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
IN AVG
$11.1M
Rank
#261 / 274 | $2.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$2.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
IN AVG
$5.5M
Rank
#237 / 274 | 70.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
70.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
IN AVG
50.9%
Rank
#15 / 274 | 155738 | ||||
| Wellbrooke of South Bend | NH ADC AL MC SNF | South Bend | 129
Facility
129
IN AVG
119
Rank
#90 / 276 | ? |
40.3%
Facility
40.3%
IN AVG
68%
Rank
#250 / 270 | -41% | 3.72
Facility
3.72
IN AVG
3.48
Rank
#83 / 275 | -25% | +7% | $0
Facility
$0
IN AVG
$45.5k
Rank
#1 / 277 | 17
Facility
17
IN AVG
23.3
Rank
#110 / 277 | 3.4
Facility
3.4
IN AVG
3.9
Rank
#130 / 277 | 1 | 52 | - |
44
Facility
44
IN AVG
44
Rank
#142 / 264 | Hancock Regional Hospital | $11.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$11.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
IN AVG
$11.1M
Rank
#99 / 274 | $6.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$6.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
IN AVG
$5.5M
Rank
#72 / 274 | 55.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
55.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
IN AVG
50.9%
Rank
#66 / 274 | 155824 | ||||
| Briarcliff Health & Rehabilitation Center | NH HOS MC PC SNF | South Bend | 131
Facility
131
IN AVG
119
Rank
#86 / 276 | C |
72.2%
Facility
72.2%
IN AVG
68%
Rank
#128 / 270 | +6% | 4.31
Facility
4.31
IN AVG
3.48
Rank
#37 / 275 | -42% | +24% | $10.8k
Facility
$10.8k
IN AVG
$45.5k
Rank
#230 / 277 | 19
Facility
19
IN AVG
23.3
Rank
#135 / 277 | 3.8
Facility
3.8
IN AVG
3.9
Rank
#116 / 277 | 3 | 95 | - |
7
Facility
7
IN AVG
44
Rank
#235 / 264 | Pulaski Memorial Hospital | $9.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$9.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
IN AVG
$11.1M
Rank
#153 / 274 | $6.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$6.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
IN AVG
$5.5M
Rank
#85 / 274 | 64.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
64.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
IN AVG
50.9%
Rank
#25 / 274 | 155831 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other IN nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Indiana
Briarcliff Health & Rehabilitation Center is located in SOUTH BEND, Indiana.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Indiana.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Briarcliff Health & Rehabilitation Center
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Who is the Director of Nursing at Briarcliff Health & Rehabilitation Center?
Kimberly Chrisman is the Director of Nursing at Briarcliff Health & Rehabilitation Center.
02 Who is the owner of Briarcliff Health & Rehabilitation Center?
Briarcliff Health & Rehabilitation Center is legally operated by Pulaski Memorial Hospital, and administered by Christopher Gill.
03 Is Briarcliff Health & Rehabilitation Center in a walkable area?
Briarcliff Health & Rehabilitation Center has a walk score of 7. Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
04 What is the license number of Briarcliff Health & Rehabilitation Center?
According to IN state health department records, Briarcliff Health & Rehabilitation Center's license number is 26-013420-1.
05 When does Briarcliff Health & Rehabilitation Center's license expire?
According to IN state health department records, Briarcliff Health & Rehabilitation Center's license expires on December 31, 2026.
06 What is the occupancy rate at Briarcliff Health & Rehabilitation Center?
Briarcliff Health & Rehabilitation Center's occupancy is 72.2%.
07 How long has Briarcliff Health & Rehabilitation Center been in business?
Briarcliff Health & Rehabilitation Center has been operating for approximately 1 year, based on available licensing and registration records.
Updated on
